mysteriously extinguishing the star of ukrainian politics not so long ago, ukraine was the champion in socio-political broadcasting in the post-soviet space, apart from news on national buttons, 11 information tv channels worked in the country. today the situation has changed dramatically, or rather change. she started with the coming to power of vladimir zelensky severely criticized the incumbent president and his closest associates. they did not spare his name and on the air of the channel in close to viktor medvedchuk zik 112 newsvan, and after zelensky’s conflict with the oligarch rinat akhmetov,

his media outlets ukraine and ukraine 24 began to criticize the president. in this situation, at the beginning of 2021, zelensky, with the help of the national security and defense council led a new practice of working with the media without trial and bringing specific charges against them, sanctions are imposed and this serves as a basis for disconnecting from the air or blocking. so they closed three channels of medvedchuk, zelensky explained this as a fight against russian propaganda. journalists called it censorship and repression, then they tried to block the country's largest opposition website, akhmetov's channels were dealt with without sanctions by officials of the government and zelensky's office and his deputies. they just stopped noticing these channels, although they used to go there with pleasure on talk shows. but this was not enough for re-election for a second term

. even support from the media empire oligarch kolomoisky, who was in the first company today, and tomorrow, may not be in zelensky’s office, they understood that the new elections need to be approached with their own. for this, the media created the dom channel for budget money, but with its managers it is the only one that can broadcast in russian, allegedly because it is designed for viewers of crimea and donbass and another parliamentary channel. the rada was also headed by managers from the president's office. so they killed two hares, reduced the presence of positions on it and made the channel a mouthpiece zelensky and his party. it remained to decide something with the tv channels of a direct competitor. poroshenko hoped to reach an agreement with akhmetov. with the start of a special military operation, the situation in the information field of ukraine has changed dramatically, zelensky realized that under martial law

it is possible to completely legally monopolize the entire information space of the country. today, all the largest national channels broadcast around the clock an information marathon, which is jointly done by the media holdings of kolomoisky's oligarchs. akhmetov pinchuk and itasha are managed and coordinated by managers from the president's office, poroshenko's channels were not taken into the pool, they considered that there was no point in cooperating with competitors. and after a while they are like medvedchuk's channels. just turned off from nationwide digital broadcasting. as a result , zelensky’s team achieved what previously could only be dreamed of by journalists from various alligraphic media groups working on the same channel and with the editing that is determined from the president’s office about what the television inform space of ukraine looks like today in the plot

anna efimova the russians fired rockets in the kiev region for you and your russia has already begun. to the last living russian soldier and rashist , the whistling of shells, not only on the battlefields, but also on the screens, conversations on the verge of a foul on television, a typical picture of the day over the past few months. this is how the information war looks like, but you can’t win this war, what kind of nonsense traces of ukraine’s uncompromising steps towards victory are shown everywhere russian troops are moving away from kiev because they are not regrouping, but militants allegedly broke down, besieged on azov steel, it turns out they are being evacuated. they surrender to the evacuation of the ukrainian defenders. out of tiredness , a special example does not converge from the pages of the world media. the desperate struggle

for serpent island for ukraine, in fact, without slots on the black sea, attempts to seize this territory are not only akin to suicide, but it simply does not make any sense to keep this piece of land. in the black sea. near odessa with such resources. it's still impossible, but attempts continue. i have so-called successes right there. mercury president zelensky is the final stage of the fight for the snake, our national ensign has been installed there. at the end of march, the ukrainian channel did not have the right to make their own tv product, according to zelensky's decision, they broadcast centrally within the framework. the so-called unified tv marathon is supervised by the relevant department of the president's office. u ukraine people, uh, who are responsible specifically for unifying u information, uh, they carry it out through the national security council through controlled courts and through the ministry, uh, culture, which led by an experienced television man and who turned out to be

judas from the conclusions of the word, in the ukrainian version alexander tkachenko in 2020 the ministry of culture and information policy alexander tkachenko has rich experience behind him 30 years of work in journalism before his appointment to the post, for a long time he directed the channel one plus one kolomoisky . and as they say, he did a lot to incite hatred towards opponents of coup d'etat , moreover, since 2014, tkachenko has advocated a ban on russian content on ukrainian television, and after being elected to the verkhovna rada as a measure to counter russian propaganda, he called for the closure of online cinemas and anonymous telegram channels. however, in their aspirations. he was not alone, his colleague, a deputy from the same ruling party, the servant of the people, maryana, the bezugla , suggested, for example, to special vigilant viewers, to write denunciations against journalists. whose plots contained , in her opinion, statements that were non-triotic and diverged from the general line of the party; the audience wants to hear what she wants to happen now

segmentation. there, according to age, according to social status, according to the level of interest, but in general, some kind of global agenda. basically, there is a request for a person to know. let him get the answers he wants, and sometimes he will model what he wants to hear, so that it would be better. well, waiting from the miracle of a fairy tale to the start of full-scale hostilities in ukraine , volodymyr zelensky actively broadcast a miracle and a fairy tale in his social networks. the head of state ran around the fountain, took pictures of shawarma and posted a detailed video report on how he buys coffee and sandwiches. but the problems of the country were not solved at the same time. and i’ll come for you, happily yak at first did not refuse from his habit of blogging the president, as an experienced medical worker, to be in trend. he changed his style, became more brutal, changed into khaki and slightly reworked the presentation of content on the air nezalezhno zelensky is now one of the main newsmakers of ukrainians. ukrainians are all our signs today buff for

a simple day. we are definitely parash for the benefit of all. now personal freedom in the media space. the head of state only got more, he is the most influential oligarch of the country rinat akhmetov, refusing the license of all his media outlets, simply presented president zelensky with his own media business media game ukraine, which owns, among other things, the largest national tv channels ukraine and ukraine 24, allegedly due to unwillingness fall under sanctions because he sent the loot of the law on oligarchs that akhmetov is giving away his channel. this means that he has already withdrawn all his assets from ukraine, but channel. you can't have your bbc cnns and all the other riff-raff there, yes, so of course he just gives it away. there, as unnecessary , only one thing is dropped and left in conditions when the media are engaged in propaganda around the clock in the interests of the current government from a useful asset and instrument of influence. they turn into ballast for the oligarchs. the main tv channels of ukraine

are chronically unprofitable and now pay for fakes about the beating of babies in the body of a former ambusman. lyudmila denisova. apparently. zelensky himself will have to this woman and the children and parents of their children raped and men and old people stop at nothing in their fictions. lyudmila denisova went so far too far that she returned to her as a boomerang. in may, the verkhovna rada, with a scandal, removed the ombudsman who had climbed in from office. as a result of a journalistic investigation, it turned out that all the high-profile accusations of denis were also against the russian army. a pure lie for the production of fake officials organized a dubious psychological help hotline. where, allegedly, more than a thousand victims turned, denisova herself called their stuffing of work on the information front and the reasons for their dismissal sincerely. another odious person, adviser to the office of the president of ukraine, aleksey arrestovich, nicknamed lucy, who stuck with him during his acting career, did not understand his statement, they disassemble it into quotes on the

internet, they joke that you can endlessly do three things, look at the fire, water and listen to the mariupol arrest, mariupol is not . yes, that’s all, until may 6, briefings on the successes of the ukrainian army with the participation of arrestees were regularly published in the telegram channel of zelensky’s office. however, then he radar disappeared. even among ardent supporters , the number of those who are ready to believe him is significantly reduced. the national idea of ​​ukraine is one central national affairs of ukraine is to lie to yourself and others as much as possible. because if the truth is told, it will collapse, everything is likely, following this logic, the largest news agency in ukraine, unian, began to attract. as experts in astrologers and psychics , predictions of future victories, vsu and forecasts about the imminent liberation of cities began to appear in the news feed with enviable regularity. i. in general, this is even can't be called a word propaganda anna efimova valeriy savelyev anastasia popova tipi ukraine about

why information on ukrainian television looks like this today. we'll talk to our permanent expert, uh, alexander vasiliev, historian and political scientist. sasha good afternoon. hello , since 2014 a lot has changed in ukrainian television, especially in the presentation of information. what is the essence of these processes and the meaning in those times before the war. yes, we remember very well how, in the studio of the talk show yes, ukrainians could sit nationalist and communist. yes, they could be there, in extreme cases, there could be grabbing each other's downloads as part of the genre, so to speak, features of these kind of talk shows. yes, but no more than that, and indeed there was some kind of pluralism on different channels. there were these different shows that politicians and acting ministers came to. that is, all this looked like a really very realistic environment, but since 2014 exactly half of the political aspect. turned away from television as the main source of information for the population

as before, yes, for millions of people, this part of the political spectrum was simply cut off and a complete consensus was established there, which was tied to the recognition of the maidan, so to speak, the democratic revolution of the revolution of dignity. uh, recognition of the whole set. uh, the ideology of ukrainian nationalism. yes and so on and so on and so on. that is, that's all, then she took off. uh, the slogans of freedom of speech, of course, and then yes, we all remember these turbulent processes, when certain tv channels tried opposition politicians there. eh, how can i still rebuild from here of this pogrom that took place in the media environment in the fourteenth year, and we see what happened before the resettlement, that even those remnants, so to speak , of freedom of speech, which, by inertia and after the maidan, were preserved in some form. yes, zelensky simply began to defend the information field in the wildest way. that is, here, uh, as if a realistic picture, it collapses even more in recent months. uh, at first it was

a specially military operation, because and we know what is there on all channels, yes, there is one marathon and how the information turned out to be completely centralized, uh, and it, of course, became much easier to manage this, but information. well , it is obvious that this is an effort of president zelensky's office in which a huge number of people who came from this television business perfectly understand its laws, know how he is configured. a. what is the role of zelensky himself in this process, also a man from tv? yes, this is a very interesting story here, because zelensky is a man from tv and uh, at the same time he is still not an information man. yes, and he is, well, an entertaining artist, but a genre. and if we remember the first steps, again in this direction, then, and zelensky was positioned as a person who, thanks to this background of his, can communicate directly with over the head media yes, because he was given this control over the media to the office

of the president, far from immediately. it was painstaking work, a serious struggle for formation. here is this single agenda, but so far it has not been. yes, here zelensky went out, as if to the people, uh, recording some we remember, yes, the videos are there, however, later, when they began, uh, political problems are we remember that they had to. uh, yes, this is a very jealous and, uh, branched media community in kiev. they were forced to respect. there, not everything was complementary from them. in fact, there were poroshenko’s, so to speak, those who tried there, fucking scandals, yes, yes, that is, it’s like such a struggle, but until today. here we see how this line continues, that it is regular, and zelensky’s speeches there are almost daily yes, at the end of the day, but they have become. uh, just let's say it exists focus. this common common media field, well, i want to return to

form from the content of ukrainian television. uh, after all, all over the world television is, after all, uh, the preservation of some kind of cultural norm and even ukrainian television . uh, with some glitzisms groundhog, but lately, when you watch ukrainian television. it seems that the language of tv presenters just turns into a raincoat, well, language from the lowest level. why is this happening? yes there really is such a fashionable word. yes, toxicity. it is so emotionally exaggerated. it is so downgraded culturally, that is, such dehumanization. and their opponent there, one might say, is not even so much an opponent, that is, that’s the vocabulary, yes, and then the pitch that e became. a new uh, well, or something, such a new norm in ukraine yes, it is taken as a

basis, but culture, well, i don’t know the most such lumpenized of some urban marginal strata, and this is largely due to the fact that this media class, especially the people who came with zelensky yes, as it were, already on the second wave of renewal. yes, they are, as it were, like guys from the people, which means that they communicate with these people in the same language in the language of the street. yes, in this way, but trying, well, to be closer to him, that is, so that their propaganda, but penetrates deeper and deeper, without restraining himself in any way and causing e. well, it's certain. here is the delight of those who consume such content sounds unity, bad vocabulary, and so on and so forth. if it can imagine allow. ah, well, people who are newsmakers, yes, that is, there are politicians, and some famous people, then, of course, journalists after there are ministers or the president cursed on the air. yes? naturally, nothing else is holding back. these people themselves even today these people already speak the channels, yes, they run the channel,

and, uh, these are their former skills, yes, which concerned, well, enough of the ear-shaped segment of politics, they are now doing. this is the new norm. thanks sasha it was very interesting. in ukraine like to assign to large cities. title of the capital. there is such a specific form of regional patriotism. its residents consider lviv to be the ukrainian cultural capital. since the time of the russian empire, odessans have called their city the southern palmyra, donetsk is the main city of the dpr was the capital of ukrainian industry, dnepropetrovsk, if you believe its inhabitants, is not the first, but not the last financial capital of ukraine and of course, kiev is the current administrative capital of the country. but kharkiv is the first soviet capital of ukraine the city officially bore this title in the ussr from 1919 to the

thirty-fourth year, and then once again became the capital for a short period of liberation from the nazis in the spring of 43, if we also count the status of the capital until the somewhat krivoy rog republic in 1918, then, kharkov three times, capital city. actually, the reasons for pride in kharkov are not limited to titles and titles, it was here that it was opened in 1805. the first university in the south of russia was founded a little earlier in 1789, the first in little russia, a permanent theater in the thirties of the xx century, kharkov became the third after moscow and leningrad were the industrial center of the ussr before the war. here they produced 40% of all machines and mechanisms in ukraine. 1932 in kharkov, for the first time in the country, the atomic nucleus was split, and finally, the kharkov house of industry, the first soviet

skyscraper. with such a level of engineering and technical intellectual and administrative thought in kharkiv, a special type of local elite was formed, politicians emerged from it during the years of independence with serious ambitions for the all-ukrainian level story by olga mokhova in january 2007, the attention of residents of eastern ukraine was riveted to the news from the kharkiv region, here at the vezma district hospital. doctors fought for the life of the deputy of the verkhovna rada yevgeny kushnarev, who was wounded during the hunt , they could not be saved, the official version of the investigation of the murder by negligence gave rise to many doubts and is somewhat shrouded in mystery. why might this be? and so by chance, because i know some of the participants. and they know well. yes, and on the other hand, such political alignments in the future in the near future,

that everything can be, because in ukraine somehow you know everything happened by chance the political career of evgeny kushnarev started even before the declaration of independence of ukraine inclined to keep up with the times, he became one of the founders in kharkov at the very end of the eighties democratic platform of the cpsu on the wave of struggle against the old command of the administrative system. kushnarius is first elected by the supreme soviet of the ussr and then becomes the chairman of the kharkov city ​​council. kushnarev was a good mayor. oh, kharkov was quite a junk city, it was difficult. then, because the budgets were pennies compared to the current budget, and he was naturally elected president of the association of mayors of ukrainian cities at the beginning of the 2000s, kharkiv region. they manage to revive the region in 4.5 years; the region takes a leading position

in many respects, and the city of kharkov becomes the center of russian-ukrainian cooperation in 2001 here to participate in the economic presidents putin and kuchma come to the business forum and in 2003 the belgorod region of russia and the kharkov region of ukraine create the slobozhanchina euroregion. before him, all sorts of euroregions and everything else were invented, but it was he who was able to implement them and push them through at the national level so that these relations between russia and ukraine were clothed in some form. let the form of euroregion. let any format that would simplify the options for cooperation yevgeny kushnarev was the head presidential administration and first deputy chairman of the people's democratic party of ukraine and even created his own party, but for truly public politicians. after the orange revolution, he became 200 in the presidential elections. this year, kushnaryov supported the candidacy of viktor yanukovych and eventually entered the list of the party of regions, to be honest, i will say. here he was in the party of

regions very, well, complex, i would say, that is, the donetsk ones, as they were called. in general, he was perceived with caution. uh, and he's in in general, e feared for quite a long time, and participation, therefore, uh, in this structure in november 2004, after the second round of presidential elections in ukraine , viktor yanukovych is gaining a little more than 49% of the vote, and his opponent viktor yushchenko 46.5 for the first time in independent ukraine clearly contradictions appear between the southeast and west of the country, several western ukrainian cities and regions recognize yushchenko as president in kiev, in his support they organize a multi-day mass rally. maidan in. at the same time, yanukovych's supporters gather in severodonetsk, luhansk region, the first all-ukrainian congress. we wanted deputies of all levels, we wanted a federal structure of the state, we wanted, uh, not to touch our history, and we wanted

the russian language to be a second state , these are quite legal requirements, but we were not heard and ukraine went according to a completely different scenario nationalism in a multinational state . he won, so we have what we have now, then 3,500 delegates from 15 regions of ukraine went to severodonetsk and the project for the creation of a southeastern ukrainian autonomous republic it was assumed that 10 regions of the country could enter there, no need to test our patience. for any attack. we have a worthy response up to the most extreme measures, and i want to remind the burning heads under the orange banners from kharkov to kiev 480 km, and to the border with russia 40 after these events. the truth is useless as a result, my pro-government media, which did not bring the term separatism into the lexicon of ukrainian politics, from now on call everyone separatists. who

defends the interests of the russian-speaking population in the main actors of the organizers of the severodonetsk congress start criminal cases kushnarev for a short time, it turns out he was actively engaged in arrest, kiev, and then they had to find this one to blame. well, then, given the brightness and given the radicalism of kushnarev's statements. he, of course, hit. it was precisely in this format that he was the person who was conveniently labeled, who was convenient to initiate criminal cases and say that he wants ukraine to collapse. in 2006, he survived an assassination attempt during the election campaign, having entered parliament number 11 of the list of parties of the regions, evgeny kushnarev becomes its main speaker. he takes part in the development of the basic law of ukraine , offers to expand the circle of issues for an all-ukrainian referendum, declares that the issue of joining the country to international military-political blocs should be considered on the basis of a plebiscide. if, uh, then under the raisins,

eh, kushnarev's life was not cut short, then i think he had all the prospects. uh, in order to grow into such an independent political figure and uh, to support the party of regions, so to speak, ideology, the unexpected death of yevgeny kushnarev in 2007 was one of a series of strange departures from life and bright ukrainian politicians. in 2004 , the minister of transport and communications georgiy kirpa committed suicide, and in 2005 he was stuck. former interior minister yuriy kravchenko olga mokhova anastasia popova valery savelyev typical ukraine that's all we wanted to tell. kirill vyshinsky was with you today. good luck to you. not people are watching

the premiere. words of another answer i don't have a catcher, but all the series watch now for free without registering in the

application or on the site. from whom was the backbone of nationalist groups going to be young people? this is the ultras nazi hook, the idea of ​​the nation, as the henchmen of nitrogen say. the mistreatment of the change by the population, yes, it's a common crime that closes people in the drama theater, and then they undermine the framework. this drama theater did not fall. it was undermined, apparently. you charge was laid right here the ceiling. you see, at what time from below it is enough separation from below at the legs they shot.

model of total domination the so-called golden billion is unfairly changing the world, although from this those who robbed other peoples or not those who can truly develop speech on the forum strong ideas for the new age will tell. let's go there, guys. we not only can we destroy. we can steal them reservists. dnr called fire to themselves.