the war was an invasion of the city of bendery on june 19 , 1992, by military formations precisely from the side of moldova and in order to stop the massacre, uh, the killing of civilians by the children of the elderly, and so on, in order to save lives and, by and large, the advancing side, uh, the moldovan military who were thrown to the slaughter. uh, it was russia who intervened and after the peace agreement, peacekeeping forces were introduced. then they became tripartite by agreement, in addition to the peacekeepers, russia participates in the peacekeeper. transnistria participates peacekeepers and moldova also had observers from ukraine 12 military officers, but after uh february 24, the ukrainian military withdrew from the territory of re- transnistria for 30 years, of course, peacekeeping. uh, the format, the process ordered its

effectiveness on the shores, nistra e did not allow the escalation of the conflict and peace was kept on, our land, of course, after the well-known events of the end of february of this year and the start of hostilities on the territory of ukraine, uh, the geopolitical situation has changed changes in the end. and, of course, it all affects, and in that including us. what about provocations? yes, uh, for a given period of time, here is march and in principle, april may, uh, eight terrorist attacks were committed against transnistria, uh, acts of terrorist attempts to strike at the territory of transnistria uh. here are some crimes solved, some crimes are being solved, but, nevertheless,

sooner or later we will call all the customers and executive executors for any terrorist act. conclusion asked anton the question uh, west you know, i don't see that uh, here hmm anyway, i don’t even see it in words. uh, what about western structures, uh, western states, there, uh, the osce missions, including uh, were interested in escalating the conflict in words. so i meet and uh saved britain and today i met with the word of the united states of america before that i met hmm uh, the special representative of the current head of the osce in europe uh, before that i met with the minister of foreign affairs. poland, mr. avral, who chairs the osce, you know, everyone is talking by and large about the world and not that, in principle, does not want the expansion of the conflict in ukraine and guarantees peace in

the territory of transnistria, however, here we have taken place with these tourist terrorist attacks and terrorist acts that go against, as it were, the promises of peace in words . uh, that's why the measures are on a delicate topic, and it is categorically impossible to interfere, uh, i will explain in the conflict in transnistria. why, if suddenly god forbid yes, there will be some kind of paramilitary operation against transnistria e. 220,000 russian citizens live here federation with domestics. here are the russian peacekeepers e. well, of course, russia , as i understand it, will protect. e their citizens living here on the shores are strangely civilians . oh, of course, in this conflict. maybe, theoretically, it will already be involved, and practically also moldova. and theoretically, and, uh, romania and other

nato countries, therefore. here, a conflict is possible during escalation. that is precisely the tension and conflict of the war, and here pridnestrovie is already in direct conflict between the russian federation and nato. that is in fact, drawing other states into the irbita of the conflict between ukraine and russia is the way, in a bushy account , to a world cataclysm in a world war. if we are to tell and remember the wars of the first world war, then it was precisely the involvement of other states that led. uh, the cascalation of the conflict called the first world war ii. this is unacceptable here, so this thought is important and i am trying my, uh, meetings, which are really a lot to convey that we should all be interested in peace in the world and here on peresnostrovsky land and it is precisely the peacekeepers of russia that play a very important role in guaranteeing peace. in transnistria, not only in transnistria, by the way , everyone understands this, in fact everyone

understands. even those who allah desires the withdrawal of the peacekeepers. from the territory of transnistria even those who vote the parliamentary ensemble of the councils of europe on march 15 to recognize russia as an aggressor. uh, and uh , that russia occupied transnistria in 1992 even they understand that it is russia russian peacekeepers keep the peace here in this, e, and in transnistria and in the global region as a whole. and by the way, speaking about the two documents, this is the peace agreement on july 21, 1992 , signed by the presidents of both moldova and russia and the vote of the moldovan delegation. recognition of russia as an aggressor. just imagine two documents that absolutely exclude each other, but nevertheless, these two documents exist in time not in space and

moldova votes for recognizing russia as an aggressor. the one that stopped the war and stopped the aggressor, the aggressor, then they vote for recognition russian peacekeeper the aggressor is the same time. uh, well, keeping the agreement on the twenty-first people in the second year. uh, i don't know, it's not even breaking through it's some. an unhealthy thinking conflict, that is, it is impossible to imagine and set the document together, but nonetheless. this is a fact of today. please tell me, if we talk about the economic blockade of transnistria by moldova in your opinion. could it be that aggravating? uh, the relationship between different banks is not scary, what will unfreeze uh, conflict hypothetically is this possible and uh, what and who needs to do to allow this

defrosting of the conflict. but anton is any kind of aggression, perhaps not only military aggression. aggression can be humanitarian aggression, it can be economic and, uh, a complete economic blockade , that's a complete complete economic blockade of course not, today it is a fact. well, a complete economic blockade is, of course, even if the conflict escalates naturally. uh, to possible uh and collisions. that is, it must be excluded. completely and we are working on it, although the moldovan country. there are questions today. uh, but nevertheless there is a contact of political representatives, there are other contacts and plus one. and here, uh, in the context of the absence of real meetings in the five plus two format, to a whole new level in leaving the speech in the 1 + 1 format. and we should date. we must speak. uh, the way to the object of the

conflict is understandable is the lack of negotiations, just if we look, uh, any conflicts, they started with the fact that they ended with the mountain pass and naturally, i am an ardent supporter of the continuation of the dialogue. e with moldova e in a case! these negotiations, including the problems of the economy, which we will try to solve with our moldovan colleagues, but it’s all difficult, but nevertheless, those who are going will master the road and we must go along this road expert diplomats follow the road of negotiations are discussing this topic. what could be the consequences? i want to draw this question for you. what could be the consequences if chisinau withdraws from that very agreement, and the principles of peaceful settlement of the armed conflict in transnistria, an agreement that was concluded 30 years ago. e. can this become a prerequisite for the outbreak of hostilities? you know, it's even

scary to discuss this possibility, although, of course, there is a way out of the peace agreement - this is a 100% step towards a war of escalation of the conflict. please comment on the reasoning in the world press. they are about an alleged threat from pridnestrovie from pridnestrovie against ukraine, in your opinion, where can the roots of this rhetoric be, who can benefit from it. you you know, in my opinion, it is beneficial to those hmm, the first one is to whom it is beneficial to discredit the russian peacekeepers of the russian military and the second. who wants to involve, uh, transnistria, moldova. perhaps romania has a conflict that is, uh, in ukraine, you understand? hey, who's behind this? what structures? what institutions? what faces? well, probably it is already necessary to

analyze and express certain political figures, but nevertheless there are many sober-minded people who absolutely do not want to. e retraction of precisely our region of our territorial space. this conflict does not want to expand into the european territory of this conflict, so all these statements are strokes. dangerous transnistria does not pose a threat not to moldova not to ukraine just transnistria is not even able to be the guarantor of peace here in the region of the guarantor of peace, we are, so we are traditionally. uh, we will continue our peacekeeping activities and call everyone to peace at various venues vladimir nikolaevich please tell us about the situation regarding removal and disposal of ammunition a lot about it. they say ammunition. where are 20,000 tons still in soviet times in transnistria. here are the statistics given. and you said in open

areas that this is russia's business because the warehouses are in charge. actually our country. and what else is important in the liquidation of these warehouses? dantun, well 3 years ago just in the month of august. uh, i had a meeting here on the territory of transnistria in the city of bendery, uh, sergei kouretovich shoigu with the minister of defense of the russian federation where he represented. uh, a very high delegation and just a question is one of the questions. it was just a matter of disposing of these ammunition. uh, sausage village, and we came to a common understanding that, of course, these ammunition should be disposed of, that is, there is an agreement in principle , and russia also has transnistria well, that's the question, which means, in principle, we are ready to help provide all kinds of assistance , but other

questions arise. how by way of removal by on-site disposal, if on-site disposal is necessary build some relevant modules, er proms? its good to dispose of this type of ammunition, if you export yes, you need to provide logistics, and so on and so on and so on. in principle, i was just waiting for, uh, from the russian federation, maybe this and other, so to speak, uh, other side of hmm methodology. uh, hmm, we, as local authorities, are interested in the following aspects. this is man-made e, safety and environmental safety in the disposal of these ammunition. naturally, when we see e disposal plans. and how way, so to speak, it will be executed. uh, then, of course, we will ask questions about ensuring technogenic environmental safety. uh, well, well-known events of geopolitics have taken place.