we watch to know everything about russia , we watch the best historical series for free without registration. i greet you, dear viewers of channel russia 24 on our author's besogon tv program

today, i would like to continue our last conversation a little. anatomy of falsehood, but a substitution about how one thing turns into another before our eyes, like in a circus, like in a kikyo, when some concepts are replaced by others, when, uh, some ideas instantly change color, turn completely into the opposite and what is most important? how what about people? they don't see it. they don’t feel it or they don’t think about whether what a person says matches what he does. does what he calls us to do what he

declares with what he really believes in and in general, does that external image combine with the gut that he wants to present himself to us, i talked about this m-m today, because quite recently it was pretty. uh, exponential history this concerns the recent history of a recent sensational interview with a nobel laureate in literature 2015 svetlana alexandrovna alekseevich nobelevsky in literature, who is older? remember what significance it had for the world, for the artistic literary world in general, for world culture in general, the appearance in a certain year of a certain new nobel prize winner in literature. this is the row in which the name of the nobel laureate alekseevich kipling stood in a

cold voice, and among those who write in russian, bunin pasternak sholokhov, solzhenits brodsky and svetlana alexandrovna alekseevna it would seem nobel the prize thing should be, uh, objective enough , after all, it is given for literature. but the thing is, as we understand today. this is the anatomy of falsehood, it is spreading quite widely, we are beginning to understand that not only the quality of literature is a reason for a writer to receive this nobel prize. today we see that, in a certain sense , alekseevich still receives a prize not so much for literature. how much for a position for a point of view for

the point of view that is most beneficial today to the world that is with us with russia in certain, let's put it mildly strained relations, probably not her. the first many thought and still think that, let's say, the solzhenitsy prize is also given not so much for literature. how much for his position for his point of view for his rejection of the soviet regime? pros of the civil war, but this is great literature. this is a gigantic work, one can agree to disagree with him, but this is a man who has a base under him, who has a powerful foundation under him, and the whole building of his literature stands on a very powerful foundation of his worldview. he discovered the world for himself and found something new, but this did not move him from his personal position, which made him

a great writer for ministries. and what do we have in this particular case with the nobel prize-winning writer, mrs. alekseevich well, in general , for the sake of justice, uh, almost all the writers whom i called their fame received earlier than they did, but were awarded the nobel prize. and folkers kipling uh and bunin and so on. i'm afraid i won't be mistaken if i say that the work of mrs. alekseevich gained fame after she received the nobel prize, but really, but look, if we talk about literary qualities about and scale about language, it’s still language, and this is the basis of literature, she writes in russian unless today in our literature e -e unworthy, well, at least close, approaching in their talent to the writer's talent of mrs.

alekseevich, we have prilepin and pelevin and alexei ivanov, a turtleneck, which means not for literature. and for what, but for that, for a cloud of vision, which coincides with what is in trend today, as they say, now let's try. you can’t even compare, but simply by hearing and remembering the fundamental human nature of solzhenitsyn yes and all those whom i named with what is a battle. eh, as a person, as a principled writer, as a philosopher, and ms. alekseevich hmm, when she does not think about it, but in what way suddenly? can what she says and what she expresses e become, e, the property of people who will try

to analyze the essence of what she says the journalist, sergei gurkin, interviewed mrs. alekseevich, and he immediately warned that the interview would be a tough interview and would be taken by a real person in other positions, which was generally accepted and this interview as a result during his movement. moreover, at the thirty- fifth minute, mrs. alekseevich stopped him and stopped him and forbade him to publish in spite of this ban and contrary to journalistic ethics , sir. gurkin, published this interview on the regnum portal, for which he lost his job in the delovoy petersburg edition, here's how he himself sergey gurkin explained his act as an interveneer and the laureate categorically forbade me to publish this interview. i ignored this ban, i will explain. why like more or less everything in this tape. i consider myself a democrat

, democracy at the same time implies freedom of speech and responsibility for speech, in addition, i am a journalist, if the interviewees a know what he is saying in a public place with a witness for an interview on record and b at the beginning of the conversation agrees to answer questions directly, but after 35 minutes conversation decides that he didn't like the interview, then it's his. the problems are now to the point, this interview is not thanks to me, but it is good because it finally says a lot directly and therefore thanks not to me, but it is worth hundreds of conversations, softly and about nothing. and now i want to invite you to listen to the most interesting passages that caused such a resonance, and excerpts from this interview. please listen to the positions, but i think it should

be. yes, that's right, because that's exactly what it is. uh, own business to learn something, how would image of a person on the other side. nothing personal. yes it is. no, i'm not saying, i understand the motives of the people there who do it. you find a lot of excuses for them. i just imagine that ukraine wants to build its own state. you say that the toilet was planted back. it was bad. sometimes today the ukrainian state is being implanted , this state is well expected, and it wants to enter europe, it does not want to live in the russian language. no, maybe it's some time, yes, to imitate the nation. which one, please. you say, all educational institutions there will be, of

course, ukrainian, we come to the conclusion that it is possible to ban people who are alive doing this . russia, it only did it on the territory. she even in tajikistan forced people to speak russian, but there is no other way to make a nation. no, it's clear the people who live in the area are read. the russians believe that bandera is not a hero, a criminal, and they came out with a test against whom for some reason you think that people who live in kiev should change. how to protests. these are the ones that they fought, they are bullshit , you know all this, i'm still telling you. bullshit is everything. it would not be a war there, if it were not for your weapons, so do not fool my head with this nonsense that is packed. your head. yes, pain is fear, but it's on your conscience putin like this blood and what is happening there. you took tuesday from a foreign country. on what basis now

imagine for a second that boris leonidovich pasternak or mikhail aleksandrovich sholokhov expressed such an idea that it is forbidden to speak their own language if this is required in in the interests of the state, this is generally normal, or that, for example, one can understand those who kill a writer for his point of view. that is, of course, this is not good, but you can understand, uh, these people, or, for example, that, uh, russification is bad, and ukrainization is good. well, imagine for a second that one of those people who also have a nobel prize, writing in russian , could say something like this. what was said by mrs. alekseevich well, well, well, this is the point of view. she may not like like it, but here's the point of view. but, so you

live in this coordinate system. you defend your point of view, you are unshakable. in your convictions , you reflect your convictions in your literature. why do you receive such a high award as the nobel prize? but the story is developing further there are two such peppers of funny pranksters vovan and lexus when you see lexus, you immediately remember vovan, it’s such a way, so to speak, it’s no longer a cashtepse trail, but talented people and astrauns. and after this scandal, e with an interview on behalf of the minister of culture of ukraine fighting alekseevich she received a call. i won't retell it. i suggest you just listen to it. good afternoon svetlana aleksandrovna, this is evgeny mr. hello it is very nice to hear you are being awarded these presidential awards, but

also taking one of the awards that the president himself told me. this, of course, is a very honorable award, our order of heaven. hundreds. well, yes, this is certainly a very big reward. ugh good. i am very grateful for this desire and for the support. yes of course complicate my life. but this once again shows that i, as it were, do not retreat from my convictions. we will have a new order. uh, we also have there, uh, certain award list. eh, for a long time this order of the past government was hindered by the order of stepan bandera, this is not only ours. it will also be awarded to foreign citizens and would like to see you as well. i don't know, here's the 500 run. i somehow, uh, understand that i kind of have the right to it, but this one. well, i don't know, well, that's embarrassing. is he

our hero is not, for me. it's not a question. not even a question. well, we need to talk about it. i need to think about how, in one with the ukrainian one, here's what we can do in the southeast. that's what you think, how a person thinks nobel, of course. 5 years could be done to immediately be ukrainian. here is the only thing that i read, i think, this process of decommunization, which you have monuments to everything, the sooner, the better, i still think that it is not so much necessary for communization. how many der russification? it's a very tricky problem, of course, and i think it can happen only in new generations already, when kindergartens, that means everything is kindergartens and in general, now yes, but new people need to be completely grown up a new nation, because it’s

unlikely with this one that’s when i became, that is, such people you understand for 5 years. this can be done with these people, but i would like first of all that you , if possible with the president, also go to the zone, otherwise, if you looked with your own eyes, if you want to go there. without the press, with the president personally looked at those guys who are there happening. well, somehow they were supported, at least a little. well, let's keep in touch. and here on the fifteenth, when i return from italy somehow. we can work it all out. yes, in principle, we agreed. as it were, like everything coincides, truth and position and trend, and so on and so forth, everything seems to be logical, what she said in an interview with sergey gurkin, she practically, well,

indirectly confirmed in a conversation with the minister of culture of ukraine, the second call was from supposedly representative of the ministry of culture of russia here, listen, please, it means a lot, because i was desperate. i decided my god. well, i love the country always. if you know, yes, i said that i am a person of a tough culture, that i had, as it were, three houses , ukraine belarusian and russian culture, great i never deny this, and suddenly such aggression. this was hard for me. maybe we’ll try some kind of award for you, so that the president entrusts you with the order of friendship, for example, in my opinion, a wonderful award, no matter how you don’t mind,

if the russian people always have me, they’re kind of close to me, the people are absolutely not about the person. well , look, well, how is it possible to exist in such a jelly-like state, taking the form of any vessel at the moment when you are poured into this vessel, and where is it true, where are you real? but look how what incredible flexibility, it turns out, has existed for a long time already? it's not that, so to speak, the point of view has fundamentally changed and the person has become different. here, remember the words of mrs. alekseevich regarding her adherence to principles and the fact that she does not change her opinion. and that in general it is high time, so to speak,

to document our countries and forget, a bloody past. the only thing that i read and think about is this process of communization, which is going on monuments to you all, the sooner, the better it will show once again that i don’t deviate from my convictions, i read, i catch myself thinking that i always i want to quote dzerzhinsky himself in his diaries of his letters and i do. i am not out of a desire to somehow facilitate my journalistic task, but because of falling in love with i knew dzerzhinsky very much in his personality, in his word, in his thoughts, deeply felt. he beat the children of thousands of homeless children owe him a new life, when my son grows up we will definitely come to this earth together to bow to

the undying spirit of the one whose name is felix dzerzhinsky the sword and the flame of the proletarian revolution svetlana alekseevich essay, the sword and the flame of the revolution neman magazine number nine for 1977, what did you think then? mrs. alekseevich, when, with a noose around his neck, a monument to dzerzhinsky was brought down on lubyanka square and set up stone to the victims of repression, it seems to me that in everything in this. there is just. the same falsehood the most unsteady sticky sweaty unpleasant. the need to exist all the time in a trend

to explain and justify to yourself and others for what you receive the nobel prize in literature for what kind of literature? and if another point of view would rule you the opposite, you would describe the opposite in exactly the same way. as then? it's exactly the same, just from a different point of view. there would be an opportunity to receive a nobel prize for this. and what picture imagine it turns out an oil painting is such a half-length portrait, remember vysotsky and on the left chest is the profile of stalin, she is the right marinka full face and here is the same on the right side, the gay order of the bandera of the heavenly hundred, and on the left is the russian order and that's it. that's how it fits together then. when there doesn’t exist inside, the

only thing you are responsible for until the end? for which you answer to god to the end, even not by re-readers before god, this is very connected with another story, which is also all built on lies. everything is built on a substitution on a provocation on a deception on a zombification of what happened on june 12th. you all know that there was supposed to be a rally on sakharov avenue a few hours before the start of the rally on the internet. bulk cinema call for everyone to go to tverskaya because only you, the contractors , refused to put up the stage and equipment. crap. who are you guys treating? what does it mean they refused

to stage a scene? put it yourself. there is no sound, well, you all sing in karaoke. get loose, principled people are fighters, but if you need it so tell the world what you think, why should you serve? who, perhaps, serves, some others refused, the fifth, the tenth gathered at night, put together, collected, chipped in a little. yes, and everything turned out to be a rally, but this is not true either. it turns out that it was, please, violetta volkova come by 14 o'clock on sakharov street for a rally against corruption, there is everything you need, both sound and stage, by the way, i plan to speak. here are the photos. why are you giving it up? well, because it doesn't matter. because you can't express. your sincere an important protest is important it is important to stir up it is important to catch up

with fear, chaos, blood resistance to force the authorities to use force, what is happening at this time, and on tverskaya there is a huge holiday, a huge number of people made reconstructions with their own hands, someone showed and told about some someone forged crafts, someone gave out beads, someone told and showed historical pictures, some life went on all the time and a huge number of people came there to relax on a holiday to look at what moscow is like today in the center, what happens on this beautiful holiday comes with children old people children women and so on and so forth. and now the crowd is heading there, the crowd is obviously sent there, sent with the understanding that yes, it will break in there, chaos will begin there. and where can you imagine people who

have been preparing for weeks, how they have been preparing for this holiday for a week, taking a place for themselves, agreeing with the authorities, building something, preparing. a whole week to show that they know how to enjoy themselves and not deliver him to others, but the crowd bursts in there. here is what one of those involved in the reconstruction writes. i personally do not give a damn about navalny and his supporters. but why the hell are you using someone else's self-promotion event agreed in half a year? why the hell are you breaking and damaging other people's property, scaring people who came to relax and look interesting and very sorry for fifteen-year-olds who bulging their eyes yelled at the command about retirement. a decent job, shooting everything on iphones and being dressed in branded clothes. instead of just working. and here is what timur cherepnin writes. the designer is the organizer of several festival venues, here is what

he writes at the end, if navalny called on his people to go to tverskaya knowing that a big festival would be held there. he understood what he was doing and everything that happened was his responsibility, and from the point of view of the reenactors. imagine that you are doing something with your own hands , you want to show people, and then some kind of mad, uncontrollable crowd comes and sweeps everything away with their feet. you are building some kind of house to show how people lived. she runs this house with her feet and begins to break it. and when they are asked to get down, they are responsible we are for freedom, but what kind of freedom is it, if you break someone else's, this is not freedom, this is hooliganism and vandalism, but it's still the same. well, again, this is pure gapon, in general, it is pure gapon in general. and what do they demand? look, i'm 16 years old. it is my civic duty, if i see that

my country is rotting in it, corruption must express its consent in very formulaic words from myself. can you say something? well, what can i say to myself here everything is obvious. ah. these are people in power for seventeen years. uh. they steal all the time. social elevators don't work. uh, nothing works young people do not see a normal future for themselves. tell us why did you come here today to protest against the corruption that is happening in the country. how did you deal with corruption? here i have direct personal contacts, that is, he did not encounter corruption, but for a long time my parents faced. i'll probably sprinkle on it now question. i used to want to leave this country. it was unpleasant for me to live in it for years of the family. why? it was unpleasant for you to live in

russia so early from the age of 7, because i formed a slightly wrong concept, but about the people who inhabit it. it seemed to me that all of us, most of the russian people, are her ill-mannered, uneducated cattle. so you've been here for 7 years. it was understood in this way only by excitement. it's just some kind of intuitive injustice. yes, and lies are always lies, eh. the situation with ukraine that war, which they unleashed, if i am afraid i will not go out into the street, it will only get worse, and the authorities will understand that people are afraid and do not try to resist and will only tighten the screws more and it will be as long as the authorities guide me. she is the opposition. she presses, it doesn't matter to us. absolutely the person is not important, the person is absolutely not important. important change is important, the process of anyone can come up as a candidate. it will be hitler in short, he won’t like it, how would we hitler , too, how we changed quack-quack at least

one thought of your own? at least one sincere inner desire understanding of what you want to eat it. he is not here. not only that, just think about it, it doesn't matter who at least hitler well , imagine how people do not understand what they are saying. how much they do not understand what it can lead to? how much they do not understand that they can become victims as a result? catastrophes catastrophes and this is not just a figure of speech, what i'm talking about. here is what an eyewitness writes.

pay attention to how these massive bearded people, under the onslaught of protestant ants, habitually pick up these shields of theirs and their weapons. yes, fake or training, but still sharp enough to be a danger, pushing the crowd, where any sharp edge can lead to casualties, pay special attention to how they carry these weapons away from the pushing shkolota, as when men demolish the tent lined up in a chain with one of the shields from those who in the heat forgot to put down the sword, up to moralizing assault, pulled back by the elders in the camp, and there were small children in tents, sleeping, who could simply be crushed. well, do you have any idea how that can help? what if blood had been shed? some teenager why would that lead? now look how it's

done. how is this image created? victims and persecutors look at this photo. this is maria baronova. you see how her poor girl is being torn to pieces, how she is being dragged into a paddy wagon, what will happen to her tomorrow. now look how this photo maria baronova. got up look.

if we don't learn. distinguishing right from wrong if we don't learn to see. lie and look in the root of this lie to analyze it for yourself and for others to draw conclusions, why is this being done? we will always be under the rule of gaponism. and the worst thing is that absolutely absolutely foolish people can become victims of this? a minor who simply enjoys playing on the street and nothing will happen for it . and if it does, maybe they will pay for it, so i am absolutely sure that those people who, using their naivety and ignorance of the excitement

of underage children, are pushing them to riot, pushing them to the police, pushing them to violence. they should be responsible for this, but are not obliged to respond under criminal law to use the naivety of children's illiteracy, nor knowledge of history, unforesight of what may end up being used by these people who pursue their personal power goals. it is a crime. this is a crime and should be treated like a crime, because in this particular situation, june 12th. even mr. khodorkovsky called it a provocation. but which he supports. we ourselves know perfectly well how and with what

end in a provocation, we should not allow this. let's take a sober look at the situation. and let's try to protect underage children from reckless acts, which are pushed by their adult cynical people. all the best until next time. the fan card is a new digital service for

safe and comfortable attendance at football matches. the card number is needed to purchase tickets and subscriptions. you can apply for registration from july 4 on the government services portal this summer. don and sochi card of a fan and pains for football. near the settlement of lyubimovka, dnepropetrovsk region, more than a hundred rocket launchers from the us-

made hummers multiple launch rocket system were destroyed. we rank first in the country in the collection of vodka products by hand in the open field. this allows us to hold honorable zones all-russian gardener governor of the astrakhan region. and again it’s about german turbines and eu sanctions nord stream load fell below 20%, gas prices in europe reacted accordingly what do beijing think about washington’s plans to impose sanctions on russian oil supplies to china kiev is trying, and very successfully, to arrange censorship in the american media, and will we figure it out? what kind of mercenaries are fighting in ukraine on the side of kiev, how many of them?

uglegorskaya, thermal power plant passed under control of the russian military and combat units of the donbass, the ukrainian national battalions have been holding the test since the end of may, they turned the station into a real fortified area. so the allied troops acted carefully, trying to minimize the destruction of the infrastructure . it was the first line of defense of the enemy of the ugolgorsk thermal power plant, the assault detachment managed to identify the personnel of the formation of the kiev regime and approached directly. the objects were released from the object specialists, private military companies. wagner, those same musicians, the same orchestra, the fighters acted with the support of artillerymen of the people's militia of the lpr from grenade launchers, because they thought that we would