the day before, he said that yes, he fires badly, but i don’t blame either ukraine or russia, that is, he introduced a new definition into the international concept. yes, that the nuclear power plant is shelling itself, at least, yes, based on his statement, and about the fact that it is necessary to withdraw all military personnel and military equipment from the station, allegedly to avoid deployment. there other military forces military equipment in the area. but you know, it's not even hypocrisy. and it's not even stupid . well, i don't know the ultimate cynicism. he he is not deeper man understand that and not the first year in international uh, politics. yes, especially geopolitics, and they are well aware that there are cases of war equipment and military personnel being withdrawn from a nuclear power plant. she will not only remain defenseless. she will be right there. uh, damaged. i won't say destroyed. yes, but uh, terrible things will happen there, because without air defense, yes, uh, it’s safe for russia without those guys who defend today and

bow low. uh, nuclear plant safety . eh, you see if he says one militarization, i support him, i warmly support him, only the demetrization of the post -ukrainian space. as a matter of fact, this is one of the goals of a special military operation, but the demetization that he voices. it's easy to give. uh, you know the fucking monkey. excuse the grenade, not just the grenade. yes, a nuclear grenade. this will end very badly. for all of us we don't want to live in constant fear in constant terror and the only solution is here. well, remember, we talked on the air. i talked about what i don't expect anything good from a security site. it is that if we come to some specifics and get to the vote, then this vote will definitely be blocked by the united states and other characters there, grunting at them, so the principle here is very simple. we only have to release. the territory from which the

threat rushes from which deadly projectiles fly. yes , i don’t know rockets, drones, and so on in the nuclear power plant and in general in the territory of energodar, which can already be called long-suffering. yes, here i am i constantly keep my finger on the pulse and from different parts of the city they report where something arrived, where something happened, and so on today, energodar e, in fact, has become the front line of not just the russian world. yes , the foremost of all, uh, responsible, sane and sane humanity. in relation to these terrorists, who are already visible, i don’t know why from narcotic substances, because of the loss of any conscience of reference points. uh, leading us to just a global catastrophe, without exaggeration. you see, i'm not talking about radioactive waste, where, well about 173 there are only containers, if i'm not mistaken, and they have about 4,000 worked out. i don't know, this is a colossal amount of

fissile substances, that is, radioactive substances, uh, the defeat of which can simply lead to irreparable. i'm not talking about the power units themselves, but about the fact that there are constant damage to power lines of 750 kw yes, and in principle, that after the ukrainian space is under control . zelensky is already facing a problem with the electricity of doubt. no, they led that the load at the nuclear power plant is minimal , the output is minimal, that is, there is a mode of preserving what is. yes, so that nothing happens and if until recently the territories under the control of zelensky were received daily. well, it was understandable. i will say in rubles only 60 million rubles. electricity. yes, that's energy at such a cost, there 65 even reached 70 , then soon they will not receive anything, because naturally, we will save the atom. they dance to conserve, yes, and remove those loads,

what are the liberated territories? well, i mean, i don't know what they're up to. of course, i know what they are after. they seek the opportunity to stop the offensive and liberate the post of the ukrainian space. well, by doing so, they once again shoot themselves in the head, but the truth is that there are no brains in the head, so the vital organs will not enter, i apparently. but vladimir ilyich, here the general director of mt da rafaelse promised to intensify discussions with russia, ukraine and the un for a trip of experts to the zaporizhzhya npp we know that the russian side is ready to accept the imt experts for this mission. at the same time, our post predreon doubted that the kiev authorities, uh, she has something, she has at least some interest in this. here's what you have to say about this. why may it be unprofitable for kiev that the experts of the mgt mission still come to the nuclear power plant and see everything with their own eyes. well, the answer is obvious. the thing is, we personally. well, i'm not an expert in this

energy sector, so i'm not making any loud statements, but we have a lot of questions, because what happened at the zaporozhye nuclear power plant throughout. uh, the last at least 8 years. uh, these are all kinds of experiments that should not be a nuclear power plant - this is not a place for experiments, a nuclear power plant is an important strategic hmm a strategically important infrastructure facility, uh, providing the generation of an enormous amount of electricity and not only that, an object that carries , uh, a potential threat of disaster technogenic origin. or, god forbid, an emergency situation, so the place of experiments should be either in labs or uh, at school or university yes. if you want to deal with them, but we understand that the task was set by all the poroshenko regimes, and especially by the zelensky regime, that it was necessary to go for dirty bombs. i will remind you back in the fifteenth year. the same turchinov boasted that they were engaged in, er, searches, right? and developments to ensure

that their regime, yes , has its own dirty bomb in the new space, and they will be able to threaten russia with it later. thank you very much vladimir valerievich thank you for the detailed answers member of the head council of the administration of the zaporozhye region, vladimir rogov was in touch with us, and now alexander lavrov, editor-in-chief of the atom-info portal, alexander alexandrovich, is in touch with the fifth studio on the phone hello, good afternoon. good afternoon. please tell me, in the context of what is happening around the zaporizhzhya npp, how great is the danger from a technical point of view, what is called a nuclear disaster of this very one that everyone is talking about. this is , firstly, secondly, why is there no adequate international reaction, indeed what is happening adequately called, perhaps, it is difficult and experts say political scientists say. listen attention, well, according to today's data, that is, still say that there is a risk of a serious disaster. it's too early, that is, until some serious serious damage was done to the infrastructure of the station. 17 is a bit of

a concern. uh, the moment that shelling is being carried out next to the dry storage of spent nuclear fuel, which is much less protected than a nuclear power unit. and this really backfire , then the whole to the release of radioactive substances over the reaction of the international community, but i only know that the rich international atomic energy agency. it has indeed been expressing concern for a long time in connection with the ongoing iaea director general , mr. georgia, he is ready to go there personally at the head of a group of experts to assess on the spot. what kind of damage did the station get and what necessary actions need to be taken to help this station, but as far as we can understand, that is, the author is all sorts of very concerned about this situation, but apparently there are some political obstacles either from ukraine that did not call and its allies, which still does not allow organizing. here is a nuclear catastrophe to kiev

why is he hitting, uh, directly on nuclear facilities. yes, and this is a completely clear choice of targets, and terrible dwellings can occur and this is not even for a specialist, i understand. i understand, i understand, but this question does not technically ask a psychiatrist. it seems to me or politics, but definitely not to me, i don't know why from a technical point of view. why does the kiev regime need such a catastrophe, but the only thing i can say is, of course, it is better to turn to people. here is a military expert who is in charge of military policy. well, as far as i can understand what is happening, it can be called a radiation attack by ukraine in the zaporozhye region, not a nuclear one, sort of, smart. what are the consequences? what kind of response ? this, too, can lead. but let the military say that. thank you very much, alexander yes thank you, oleksandr uvarov

, the editor-in-chief of the atom info portal, was in touch with us, we discussed the situation around the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant in the context of the shelling of this plant armed with informing ukraine, this was the fifth studio. see you.

the un de-factor recognized the shelling of the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant for kiev, however, it is the responsibility to teach, what is again assigned to moscow, whether the iaea specialists will go to the power plant, which the head of the agencies said with the fire of the nationalists, civilians in the donetsk region and the nearest settlements, arrivals regularly during the day, several more people were injured, there are dead,

and they still continue to mine the streets with petals at homestead plots in blagoveshchensk, under the threat of flooding and abundant rains, the level of the amur river is growing, but in siberia, from the rains, so far they only dream in the region rage forest fires. the russian air force is celebrating its professional holiday, our pilots are some of the best in the world, and today, on combat duty, they successfully perform tasks during a special military operation, the settlements of the dpr are again under attack by the troops of the kiev regime. in the morning, the nationalists fired more than 30 shells and opened fire on makiivka yasynovato and gorlovka, as well as on novobakhmutovka and donetsk, militants are firing from large-caliber artillery, including because of the guns and delivered by nato, but now