many politicians who demonstrate a real understanding of historical processes, they know what it is connected with, but superficiality immaturity some absolutely teenage. maxims and deeds that are absolutely which demonstrates a complete absence. dialectical thinking, that is, crushed, right? well, as it were unfortunately, there are not many politicians who do not look around . for real, who are not afraid to be.

politically incorrect, who are not afraid to remind about some things. and warn about consequences number unfortunately rarely listens, as you think for a long time with the west. we have spoiled the relationship of politicians once and then i can not be a prophet, but what is clear is that the biggest illusion that the west is guided by is that the values ​​are universal youth, brought up freedom i

ask the question of freedom. from what? let's just say or is there democracy democracy, as a consequence of what? and so on, that is, it seems that this is an illusion that do as i do and everything will be fine, this is the same arrogance which is the result illiteracy wise man and wise philosophy above all requires an understanding of deeper cause-and-effect relationships. it 's very easy. for a great politician, so i have besides humility and respect and trying to understand. there is nothing

in relation to politicians to serious politicians. you worked for a long time and lived in the usa for a long time in the west. tell me, do you understand the americans? why are they so arrogant? are there two sides to ordinary americans? it's definitely hardworking. very conscientious people, he really relates to his work. another question is what kind of people are they who are rushing into politics, who are engaged in politics. there begins other processes of formation of these people, so the policy of america

does not express it. the spirit of the american nation, in general, americans first of all think about work, and for them it's something going on somewhere. i remember once in america said, you know i want to go to or not. yes. and why is it even hard to explain? why do you want to go there or not? they have a lot to learn from this point of view. is there a difference? i used to think that democracy is the rule of the people. but mr. roosevelt explained to me that democracy

is the power of an american about the arrogance of politics. and so it remains. well, now even i think it is even more difficult, because the principles are leaving. diplomatic etiquette loyalty to the word of diplomacy everything, it goes away everything becomes easily denied, especially in terms of behavior. american diplomats, yes, and not only europe. unfortunately , now it demonstrates an absolute lack of sovereignty, yes, with the exception of a few brave comrades, this is very interesting, but i think

that this is largely due to the demographics of those who choose 40 back, people who read books went to the polls, well, now less and less reading more watching. and these are other people. this is the concept of social engineering. and the longer we live the further i live i, the more i see how very well thought out manipulative engineering can create political conflicts. there, like the egyptian spring, it's straight design, how it's made. and that's social engineering. she is in in many ways forms the public opinion of entire machines, and it is difficult for him to resist. moreover, it is easy today for a person who reads little. he

easily perceives a certain idea without thinking, without subjecting it to critical analysis. this is a rather complicated process, but nothing is possible here, but you can only observe. i see, this, in my opinion, is the lady 's generation. for which even the figures of the early xx century. what is it like? i don't know how like julius caesar lenin there trotsky or someone i'm already there poincaré they just don't even think about it and it's pretty difficult process, because the shortening of memory leads to self-deception. if we talk about the united states but not about the

american people, but the prostitution, why did they decide that they can teach the whole world to teach us to teach other countries? the dominance of the most important weapon several decades of the dominance of the us dollar there is a very good book. and by watson it's called confessions of an economic hit man. this is an american who worked, the american government. using only one thing. a large loan is offered. in a small country low interest of course, they take it. and then they

begin to dictate certain actions to him and nothing can be done. this is a very serious book. i even thought of a movie about it when you did it, but it's such a complicated topic, it's a difficult question. so this was a real opportunity. now it ends. all this ends. this is a painful process and the resistance will be with a roar and a screech . this is a complex process. change the entire economic world model, this is evident, because what happens with the brix when suddenly there are huge culture, this is not the country of this culture china india south africa brazil now argentina

now there is an incredible process, where people are, where there are huge cultures of civilization. here, oops, wait. we have common interests. let's communicate arises the most powerful. the tool that i hope will put an end to the anglo-saxon model , you know, was the famous astrologer? his name was john dee john, he lived during the time of elizabeth of england , he wrote then. the queen that siberia should be seized, it was during the time of ivan terrible, then they sent the first merchants to trade

missions to ivan the terrible. well, then ivan the terrible wanted to get married, she said to elizabeth, the parliament would not allow me, and he said, you’re a woman, you still can have parliament, point out who to marry, scolded all the wonderful letter, but the meaning is that john dee signed his reports. know as agent 007. this is the sixteenth century. everything will be cut out from there, but it's still interesting. i really like your siberia. nearby is such a saga about the people who then made our country rich and great, but the very wealth that we have is the very question that constantly arises: they want to take it from us. they want to

take wealth. everyone has someone, of course. nothing can be done here. but they believe that we are not worthy of us, but i still have hope that every nation, especially such as russia well, like all others, has an instinct for self-preservation, which is very important and then it is very difficult to imagine. what kind of sacrifices can a pension be sacrificed for the sake of saving? integrity state and sovereignty, it is very difficult for us to understand how the loss of sovereignty happens unexpectedly, and in the nineties it happened for this reason.