i know that you have decided to pay attention to the october revolution of 1917 and are even going to shoot a series of signs. i belong to a generation of people who should have studied history. we were taught the history of the ussr a short course of the vkpb. then there was perestroika, we studied, we thought. some of us welcomed the changes, some not, but of my generation. the last generation of people who studied really, of course, there are historians who today make an extremely interesting analysis of events, but among artists. at dramaturgy in particular. there is no work that

would convince me of a deep analysis of what is happening. when i studied at the conservatory at the school at the school where the great october socialist revolution during perestroika, it turned into a bolshevik coup. it was the great october socialist revolution or the bolshevik coup, do you want to understand this? here actually. i'd like to try and figure this out. with all possible, using my knowledge and what i was able to learn from the works of very smart people today, therefore, if our new generation does not do this, then the next generation. it's just going to be interesting to appear a different

kind. evaluation of character is a causal relationship, as one indian sage said, in order to judge a person you need to get into his shoes and go his way. i am trying to walk the path in the boots of nicholas ii with the shoes of vladimir ilyich lenin to understand the human personality so that it becomes intimate. well, as i tried to do, let's say so. sculptures are, of course, important, but they not the main thing, the main thing. how did he sleep, how did he go to his superiors to his father or some duke? like he? he cheated to get a budget

for his sculpture and so on. same here, of course, it's more complicated. because there are many characters. but i want the viewer himself. evaluated, but in the theater as i understand it, you decided to pay attention to shakespeare well, yes, you know. great great authors and something that they have in common? whether it’s about shakespeare chekhov stringberg, even berthold, they first have some kind of mystery, that is, something infinite that should remain so endless, but to feel that there is something for the audience. you can try, when you grope for the essence

, you can't say otherwise, what's the point? and you pull this string, and it suddenly starts to vibrate , as if the author comes to life. it seems to me that the viewer begins to feel. something that is not you and not the artists, some breath of these, everyone has their own world of this great author, but they all have one task. they are trying to understand why we live, we are not trying to answer. this is a search, but not an answer andrey sergeevich do you usually have your favorite films? favorite movie. the one that just finished, then you realize that you were wrong. but at the moment i'm interested. those searches that began

sasiklyatinoy. 65 and continued in the white nights of the postman and dear comrades. that is unnecessary things. unnecessary trifle as anton pavlovich said , people drink tea, talk about the weather, and at this time their lives are crumbling. here they show me how they collapse and drink tea. it's quite interesting and difficult. tell about the course of life, not they are an entertaining story. the viewer must think. the viewer has to come and go and say great.

and then he may even have great difficulty telling the story of a life richer than any imagination, going back to the beginning. i will ask, and you would be interested in making a film about this time about our time. in general, there are no boring stories. this is just a boring story. another question is cinematography is not the cheap process it requires. money and when there are no people who believe you. whether it's television or the ministry of culture or something? my last picture would not take place,

if it wasn't. alisher usmanov who gives money for a painting he would like to see, this is his curiosity, this is not a sponsor. this is a patron. these are different things. therefore, for me, alisher usmanov is like a medici orange. we don't know how we will feel about this time, in 5 days 10 years. just like in the ninetieth year or in the ninety- first. we hardly treated this event in the same way as we did 10 years later. 2001 needs time to make sense. it's getting harder and harder to reflect on the reasons for our lives. what for? why

we live? it's very complex. any artist thinks about it, but not everyone manages to ask this question. i'm not talking about the answer.

the protection system is strengthened by continuous shooting around the perimeter are conducted by drones. what is the situation at the zaporozhye nuclear power plant where, according to the ministry of defense, kiev is preparing a provocation as well as the consequences of a night shelling, energodar special fire regime

in 63 regions of russia per day, the area of ​​​​fires increased by 7,000 hectares outbreaks in yakutia, komi , nizhny novgorod, ryazan, vladimir regions russia as stated in the fsb for money? he transmitted information that could be used against the security of russia, a powerful water tornado in the west of crimea , eyewitnesses managed to film the revelry of the elements, we will talk about the consequences and where else on the black sea coast there is a storm warning hit the territory of the zaporizhzhya tpp, this was stated by the administration in the region, a thermal plant is important for stable operation in the zaporozhye nuclear power plant, shelling of energodar also protruded, releasing more