what do they all know anyway? well, for what we would get out. and by the way, we do not attach importance to what is already on this, that is, on the rejection of conceptual work from understanding what is behind the words, what is the meaning? what is the point? what is the point that this is the main

technique of our opponent, and we are still, by the way, inside. uh, inside her inside this technique. i, by the way, just like that, well, the right word. i honestly think so myself. so you finally seem to understand, yes, and there is even some kind of consistency, who are we ? yes, here we suddenly seemed behind the paint, we civilization. yes, that's it, that's enough. well, after all , establishing the meaning and significance of this historical self-determination of yours is a huge job, because civilization becomes in the amount of thousands of years and has existed for a thousand years, its content is determined in a significant part by this millennium. they are no less. well, yes, somehow we have it. untimely or something, and then volodya asks, well, she says a simple situation. i even

write out complaints about the education system there. a question. what should this one say? teacher, and who trained this teacher, and who trained the one who trained this teacher, and most importantly , on the basis of what humanitarian knowledge and ideas, because they determine everything and you can scream here for a long time. but, in principle, we will go around in circles until we begin serious systematic work in this area of ​​humanitarian knowledge. philosophical knowledge of historical knowledge is not bows, it is not entertainment. otherwise, they would not have attempted on dugin. because i can argue with alexandra grich, but some of them are doing just that. and does so. at a good level, the definition

of meaning in meanings. ontology of the worldview and encroaches on it. because the way out. the fundamental systemic of this is there, we will not go through with you repeating something when we love it about ideology, but at the same time, we all know, yes, that the age of such ideologies as the secular faith, which is dogmatic, and then anyone who trying to approach her with his hand they cut off that this time is over, we will not reproduce. this, and, therefore, you need something completely completely different. what won't? well, that's what's happening in the west. yes, they go in this sense just the soviet way and anyone who uh. well, as they say, it encroaches on democracy, yes, it encroaches on the very value, well, a hand scar or

see the old difference in civilization. inquisition. works great. no, there is no difference between those who encroached then and who encroach now, this is the frame and this is the frame of your knowledge, after it , working ideologies also arise. and teachers and another generation. and as for the process and special military operation, but i thought so, and i think. this is an episode. we will have to win it, and we will win it. but the situation is different. the twentieth century has become the century of world wars or world war, moreover, the word world war is interesting, on the one hand. we all the time, as it were, strain

for the fact that well, here is a huge number of states almost the whole world, and therefore we say, a world war. but that's not why it's global. and by the way, well, in the first world war, not the whole world was, in general, strongly involved, not the whole world, she world, because it is a war for world domination. and for the first time the question of dominance over the entire living sphere was raised in the 20th century as a subject of war. not abstract. and specifically as a subject of war for world domination. now if we look at the lived 20th century and the beginning of the 21st century, sit down and ask yourself a question. and that the situation was resolved? what is the question no? about the fact that well, such domination is established or the world is organized, i understood and created

a situation that, in principle, is impossible, neither one nor the other. americans counted at the beginning the nineties, that the question was removed and world domination was established, they wrote us off, but the chinese did not consider them to be players. for a long time actually don the beginning of the tenth years. and in the ten years, for ten years now, the question of a world war, as an objective method of establishing world domination, was again raised to its full height. he didn’t go anywhere, in principle, he didn’t go anywhere, but now he has been delivered to his technical implementation. and our opponents proceed from this and nothing more. and this means that

regardless of their own. whatever the word and our victory in your achievement of goals in one sitting two. no, this is not significant now, it will be significant if we start discussing it all there. i'm still discussing all of this. the big war for world domination will continue until the situation is fundamentally resolved by mankind. and resolved. it can be in two cases, or it will be achieved and then humanity will follow one historical path, or it will not be achieved and a civilizational situation will be created, one in which there is more staging about world domination, in principle, will not be possible. here, as i understand it, is a historical

moment, it is quite long. i understand that this will have to live with this for our generation. perhaps our children's generation. but this is the problem that we will need to solve and , in principle, the fate of the entire human civilization will depend on it. continuing dmitry ’s thought, in fact, the world war for peace did not end, because something, apparently, could not be completed within the framework of the 21st century, that is, the escalation that we are seeing today in the world political arena, but logically largely inevitable. and dictated by the whole transformation of the system of international relations. this escalation has two components: the first component is, of course, the balance of power is changing, the

ratio between the major players is being transformed, the second component is unnatural. it was formed by our western colleagues. and what does it mean unnaturally, it is man-made and what we are seeing in many ways today in europe is a man-made crisis created by the united states of great britain created by the anglo-saxon as a whole. here uh. this unnaturalness is based on the fact that the americans are trying to cling to their e, or surna, hegemony of sensations. here is the feeling of greatness, and the fact that everything is possible and everything is permitted. and it gives rise to such bizarre, absolutely insane, caricatured, uh, views that we see in the west. this is a western caricature, it is becoming more and more ridiculous,

but what is most terrible, it is ugly, and it undermines the whole. eh, everything, the world order. this undermining will continue exactly as long as while the construction of a polycentric world order will be observed, and it will be absolutely difficult. it will not be an easy journey of the new world order, which is being formed, it is really being formed according to the dicentric world order, no matter how much an american would like it, it will be extremely difficult. and we see it already today . we see it already today, when a number of actors begin to influence the political field inside. through what through classical things that are peculiar to us from childhood through religion? component through ethnicity, component through the idea of ​​the value factor as a whole, in addition to the economy , we have been writing it off for too long, but it really exists, the idea of ​​the value factor of confrontation is significantly underestimated and

it is through it that many political states try to break and it will be conducted through it. this is the most uh, the war of the future, the world war that says here, this is a very difficult moment, because we need to be ready for it and vladimir very often they asked what to do? yes, i'm straight chernyshevsky yes, they are to blame, what should i do? well absolutely right, who is to blame what to do? well, who is to blame, let's leave the investigation. what is there to do? eh for this? e, you can say the following, well, firstly, but to realize the onset of the new world it seems to me mentally. we're not fully prepared for this very new world that's coming because the western world as we knew it was leroy's recession with shakespeare and everything . it ended a long time ago , a completely different world is coming, a world not of the west, and we are most likely not adequately prepared for this world, this is also a matter of education. o

what has been said so far is a question of a systemic order that we need to restructure. we need to rebuild our ties to expand those ties with the strange east is what we've been trying to do over the years. we need to do it with enhanced methods, yes, do it with double strength. why is it very good that seventy e representatives are gathering today. yes, uh for the army 20-22. it's fine. this is very important and holding anti-fascist. yes. e, relatively speaking, the congress. this is very, very important. and, if you like, it is necessary form. uh, this is the very future for all who are ready to be with us today shaping the future. this is not a phrase that, uh, we are deeply dissatisfied or deeply concerned about this or that factor, this is uh, when we work with various social classes of subjects.

no matter what walls are formed for us. we can break through these walls through a mass method. uh, this is when we do not worry about the uk, but, on the contrary, we wish her all the very best in quotation marks and work inside her, including this, possible, no matter how difficult it may seem. and who will do this is necessary for this, appropriate state work at the level of various ministries or some department created, if you like, but this is our striving for a gigantic one. well, vladimir and here is our desire for gigantomania, but it is not. no, very bad gigantomania. my pleasure. it's a question that i say all the time broadcasts family drugs. and who is involved in this, nobody, these decisions, who we will allocate funds for this force, nobody if you look at us, a falling pond, we have such gaps in an absolutely modern war, but for this

there is a legislator who must be adopted, relevant legislative acts. for this, it must be carried out. eh, the relevant work, what you were talking about, including the issue of concentrating us, you are doing not only that we relay something there and deal with them, but it’s about ourselves, it’s about the st. petersburg moscow living rooms, it’s about , citizens of russia as a whole. that's how we understand where we're going. yes, we heard a number of words about civilization , about justice, and everything else. what does it mean, what does it mean from the point of view of a person, what does it mean from the point of view of the whole society. and most importantly, if i have gold. sorry, well, you're an eminent expert on turkey so, well, i can't imagine . erdogan's head-turning noggano is worried about his ottoman empire, he immediately restores the sultan, which means he turned his head to the west. now we start it around to the east. we can already stop. in that. we can already see yourself. here, initially, look at

yourself, otherwise the zadra in trousers ran after the komsomol, they quote demyan, the poor are now running. so it’s enough already to swing the shuttle back and forth, running around, that’s just the point and finishing, just now it’s very important to say what you just noted. enough to look into entering, what is there towards the west yes, into the economy towards the east, we must already go inside ourselves to engage in self-creation, if you like, yes, this very service and understand what we are going to and then it will be clearer to us how it is relay to the outside world and work with various social classes and ideological any sections of society abroad. and this, probably, is the key task that the whole current situation exposes us to take care of ourselves, while i will now say, in general, the thought is scary, for which i will tear everyone and sundry. well, maybe even purely structurally, if you look at how our state is organized, ask a question. and we

are ready for the modern challenge. no. so, maybe we need to make some movements and inside the structure of our own organization recently here. well, well, you just understand, what awaits us. you just understand, while we have it. right now, well, completely new systems of training specialists, work with youth, have been de facto christened. work with personnel. it works. why not transfer these new approaches to the government structure of the state, the formation of ideas, that is, to break down to achieve success. i really want to go ahead. i am not distracted from the idea of ​​creating an announcement about the creation of an anti-western coalitions. not in the sense that we want to destroy the west. the west wants us, which is nothing, and we want to not give them such an opportunity and defeat them on their e, field, and not on ours, and another example of the minister

will announce this, in my opinion. this us well, but returning. right now there is an administrative system. eh, so. sometimes, just from the name, the understanding of the essence of what is happening changes and hmm , a kind of transportation, if, uh, the leaders of sevastopol and the republic of crimea in the voronezh region of the kurdish region. eh, what else is there belgorod region from the governor? by presidential decree, they will become governors-general temporarily. it doesn't cost anything. this decision is one piece of paper only, but many can answer, the second has cooled down. and why do we actually have a prefrontal strip? why hasn't a temporary federal prefrontal district been created out of these

subjects of the federation, or why are we still calling these southern and eastern regions ukraine? why don't we call the former ukraine why don't we call novorossiya? this is our summary all the time. that's all the lyrical province started. e, and. you can speak widely tavria without specifying, that is, such things. well, the last much is dissatisfaction, including today it sounded. i don’t know of modern russia any such outstanding brilliant artist , writer, artist, who, for his genius and what he created, can be allowed to say anything about russia and, e.g., about the actions of our army, when there will be one second such. finally , the punished, not on the internet, is collecting that there the

pensioner wrote these above laws, and they have all friends. no, i agree with you. raised only 100%. the hand opened its dirty. mouth allowed himself to say nasty things. she is charming, answering according to the law, but if you began to say great things, then just at andrei konchalovsky 's 85th birthday, he was congratulated by the president and the wisest man. andrey sergeevich said very correct words. the hegemony of the united states is leaving. well, yes, you can see it. leaving the united states was primarily in the hegemony of the dollar after the war. how do you know the dollar. just got everywhere. it seemed

that it is already impossible to get rid of it, but it is already ending in this sense. took on absolutely heroic. valiant role all who tried to saddle or eliminate the dominance of the dollar pauly victims of saddam hussein in this sense no more. a sworn enemy of a comp

realist than our president. and what is the place in russia in this new world? russia is an original country, no matter how they try to bring it to a common denominator, nothing will work. now we will continue advertising with a new line-up.

soon, what this day will remember in history let's tell right now hello august 22, 1485 in the center of england in the county of leicestershire , the battle of boswar field took place, the last major battle of the thirty-year civil war.