what is the current situation? what is the mood of the inhabitants of these shelling of the antonovsky bridge, including shelling is far from the first time. what impression it makes and what kind of reaction it causes, including, first of all, the command of the armed forces of ukraine and the official kiev regime, they correctly said that donetsk luhansk region has become accustomed to over all these 8 years. uh, to experience these shellings for yourself, and the kherson region quietly got used to it. i have more and more people in power in the city of kherson asking when we will hold this referendum, when we join russia and when we become a full-fledged subject of the russian federation , because people are not just tired, they don’t understand how, in fact, the inhabitants understand the ukrainian nazis in the face of these terrorist organizations that call themselves today. i don't know with private armies or armies of the armed forces, but these are ordinary terrorists who strike, as we said, exclusively at the civilian population. please tell me just will the

repair work continue, how in general, how much suffered? antonovsky bridge, work will continue today, antonovsky bridge, uh. i'm not saying that he suffered there at the grossmey writes that she collapsed collapsed again. but you probably remember that he got engaged a month and a half ago two , just as the ukrainian nazis were constantly advancing. here is what is actually happening. this is how you correctly noticed the remote indication that supposedly there is still some kind of group of nazis representing this incomprehensible reich, or how to say it correctly european partners who are in every possible way under e, burn, throw up funds to unite the secrets , but once again i will explain with just such headings that the stubborn ones report to their western partners supposedly. uh, the successful military operations that they are conducting against once again we are talking about the civilian population of the kherson region. what are these nazis counting on, talking about the fact that i live here. the same ukrainians are the same people, we do not

know, we once again to you all. we speak as residents of the kherson region, then the kranazis do not count not a single human life. and it doesn't matter. the children of the elderly are civilians, and with such malice, you know, joy, they declare all those problems that today, first of all, the civilian population of the kherson region is experiencing. thank you very much kirill sergeevich thank you for quickly joining our broadcast and talking about what is happening right now. i think that not only in the kherson region, but also the inhabitants of zaporizhzhya probably experience about the same feelings when they are shelled from the sides of the regular ukrainian army of the country of nationalist battalions, which, on the one hand, also seem to say that ukrainian citizens live in these territories, and on the other hand they shoot. they constantly sometimes shoot accurately and in general, even, unfortunately, the presence of such strategically significant objects as the zaporozhye nuclear power plant does not stop them, they have been shooting at it all the last days and experts have been talking a lot, including

an international potential danger and such strikes, which it would seem should be obvious to everyone, but apparently, or not obvious to the kiev regime , or vice versa, is the very desired goal, which one so wants to achieve in order to completely destabilize the situation. mikhail ulyanov is with us. the representative of the russian federation at international organizations in wine is constantly in touch. hello. mikhail ivanovich , hear me. mikha ivanovich, here we are last week, if my memory serves me, at the end of last week we were talking about the fact that the delegation the iaea is expected at the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant is expected in early september, according to reports. please tell me if it will not be, firstly, too late, given that the shelling is constantly taking place, they are intensifying, and what are the chances that the mgt delegation will indeed end up in the energy bar. but we are in favor of such a trip taking place as soon as possible , but there are objective limitations here,

it requires proper preparation of logistical organizational even diplomatic in some to some extent, this requires a certain amount of time. therefore, earlier, from the very end of august and the first parts left in september, it will be possible to make a visit, but i think that it will still take place this time. if anything, in june in june it was ready, but external political factors intervened and the mission was blocked. now i hope this doesn't happen. yes, i really wish this didn't really happen. that's why we're asking this question, because it's really not the first time. this attempt is made if the delegation will still reach the place. what do you think from a technical point of view on the security of this facility, how will it affect? will it affect at all? well guess it's clear that carrying out a

mission. mm, the ukrainians will be forced to stop shelling and i hope not to resume, nor will resume them after the completion of the missions. although no one can guarantee this, in addition, the ukrainian side is spreading many deliberately false statements about the state of affairs at the station that the appearance of international affairs officers there is bad, but will allow them to make sure that in fact the situation is under control. if you suddenly discover any shortcomings, then i think that the russian side and the local ukrainian operating personnel will eliminate these shortcomings, perhaps there will be additional supplies of some equipment that is currently lacking there, that is, the effect. i think it will be in general, how great an effect it will be, time will tell that it is necessary to create a

demilitarized zone around the nuclear power plant zaporozhye nuclear power plant, but it obviously hints one way or another that russian troops should leave from there, it is the russian military who are now ensuring the security of the station, but this is quite obvious, judging by what ukraine is doing if there are no russian troops there. who business, in general, can reach disaster. as he wants, apparently the kiev regime. you talked about the fact that mgt is unlikely to support this idea from the land of the realized zone, but above all, because it is outside. in general , the powers of the organization. how do you assess this idea, the un secretary general topic, we believe that the implementation this idea would make the station even more vulnerable , there is no need for this. all this on the basis of, uh, all that is needed to ensure safety at the nuclear power plant is for the ukrainians to stop their shelling. you , mikhail ivanovich, as far as i know, the

austrian foreign ministry summoned you, wrote about this to the media because of some of your statements in favor of your position on ukraine , please tell us what was discussed. and uh, exactly what was said to you. the entire content of the conversation, i probably can’t, but in a nutshell austria was confirmed that they are for freedom of speech, but they have their red lines in that formational realm and there are fears that one of my latest tweets. those red lines. crossed. in response, i explained the situation in detail. on saturday night, president zelensky posted a tweet expressing his appreciation for the us president's promise to make additional arms shipments. in the same place, he expressed the hope that these supplies would help, as he wrote, to defeat the russians old songs weapons weapons weapons no diplomacy literally the day before zelensky categorically stated that there will be no negotiations. well, in practice, this

means the right to prolong the prologation of the current situation, including the humanitarian consequences of zavyansky's message and gave his commentary, i emphasize the comments of no mercy to the ukrainian population. i mean that zelensky's line is something further humanitarian suffering. you can agree to disagree with my words, but during treatment they are allowed to interpret them somehow differently, while ukrainian propaganda tried to pull my words out of context and present them almost like a call for merciless action against the ukrainian population, of course. this is a false statement. a completely shameless attempt carries over my words. and uh, make the most of it for propaganda purposes by those who

spread such false claims. i think they perfectly understand what they are offering to dirty methods, but, apparently, they believe that in the information war all means are good. by the way, with the austrians, i suggested that they carefully read the content of my account in a tweet or in the last several years to make sure there is not a single negative word about the ukrainian people, and there are actions of the ukrainian authorities, but nothing bad ever for the people. i did not speak and could not say, because neither chauvinism, nor xenophobia suffer, and of course, i consider such accusations to be simply insulting. at the end of the conversation, i asked rather the austrians, if they still have questions, there were no questions to ask them. by the way, she grayed out

the upcoming conversation on saturday that it would take place on sunday, the austrians following the results of the meetings did not begin to give any messages, from which i conclude that the austrian country considers this issue closed to him, his conscience is no longer going to. i, too, uh, i guess i wo n't be pointlessly buoyed up by responding to them anymore on this subject. but it turns out that this story was somehow blown up by the austrian media the austrian media appeared decently on saturday when my tweet got a lot of attention. uh, i was contacted by a correspondent, one of the leading austrian the gazeturia likewise asked how things really are and gave a completely objective analysis. and

one more interesting point on my tweets, not only on this one, but also on several others in ukraine, uh. hmm twitter followers twitter users have asked the administration of the social network to block in accordance with the applicable procedure, conducted an investigation and informed the complainers. and i found no reason to delete my answers on social networks. you are no longer rare. here you are now they mentioned the austrian media, which appeared to be very correct in this situation , which, i must say, is very pleasantly surprising, because , unfortunately, on the part of the western media in general, we see the maximum bias. i'm being very humble. not by uh in your address, in general today the tone is european, in particular the austrian press in relation to the events in ukraine, what is it like if we are talking about the shelling of the zaporozhye station yes, returning to the beginning of our conversation,

we see the british, for example , when they write about what it means the station is being shelled, but never. and no one writes about the fact that ukraine is shelling, they always write that just there are shelling - it's dangerous. well, in general , potentially, of course, russia, as always, is to blame for the austrian press. is this the case and how , by the way, does it react to these shellings, including in international organizations. at home, i can’t say about the austrian press, because i don’t speak german because of the austrian press, i don’t follow it much, but you in english the press does just that. as you say, they are even worse about shelling. uh, it doesn’t say at all that it doesn’t mention the responsibility of the ukrainian side. it’s just that they don’t exist, including in statements at the state level in joint collective statements of western countries very often there is not a single mention of these shellings at all, which in fact encourages the

ukrainian side to continue this practice very solidly, very irresponsibly, but such we have partners. my last question. do you think just the visit of the iaea delegation to the station and some official conclusions, well, which, well, obviously, after the work of the mission should be announced, can change this situation. maybe this is an expert word in this case, at least to be heard and break through this information blockade. to be honest, i really hope so. uh, it must be borne in mind that, strictly speaking, they are rich in the task of the agency and its secret is not included in the identification of those responsible for this or that situation. well, that's the reality. uh, in due time in organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons in western countries had to hold a separate contradictory. the convention is the conclusion of a surgical decision, endowing certain structures of this organization with the so-called attributive

functions of tolstoy, becoming tom who, who is guilty of this or that incident, is not rich, directly, probably, pointing to the ukrainian side of the agency, it may be difficult, but he himself the fact of being there familiarization of the situation on the spot, including the study of e, defense against explosions etc. apparently, much can be said and i hope that there will be a corresponding influence on further actions. thank you very much for being our guests today and indeed. we, too, very much hope that the work will not take place much gt will still take place on the territory of the zaporozhye station, especially since the zaporizhzhya administration says that they are ready to provide. all the data that she has to date, but on objective control, which will allow experts to draw their conclusions is another matter. will these conclusions be presented in public field will see very soon thanks to you for your attention.

the identity of the established fsb was told, who prepared and carried out the murder of darya dugina, who was called the organizer of my executor, where is the killer now ? what else did the president say in his address to citizens in