their achievements about their own history, i always say that you know the most significant achievement i have not yet achieved if i start to sink into memories of, uh, how much i have achieved in my life. this means that old age has come to me. and i don't want to be an old man yet. thank you for your question. here our time is up. thank you very much for the lecture and for answering the question. guys. let's thank you again. now. good luck to you. thank you, head of savings herman thank you very much dermanovsky deduction for such a wonderful lecture. thank you, thank you. well, we are now preparing to meet our next speaker. we will communicate with you because our colleague ivan has already managed to do this. here, but now we will continue the conversation. tell me how everyone is feeling. you liked the lecture. hooray guys a. where's everyone from? that's

where kamchatka was. i've already seen it? so tula udmurtia moscow moscow in fact, the whole country is represented here, and on a very large scale , even in this one patch. what lectures are you looking forward to, maybe at past marathons. here you are a young man were at the last marathon. but no, this is the first time. and as we already impress a lot, already from the first lecture of herman osich i knew it was very cool and wonderful. what are projects? i have been to previous marathons, because we are not going here for the first time, but in fact there are many. i think that if you count,

probably, 1/4 of the hall, it will be exactly. no, tell me, was there a person among you who was excellent at all our marathons. there is a little bit, but there is. that's it. that's good. what kind of topics and how it was a live broadcast of the opening of the educational marathon of social science sites opened today in four cities of russia and in lugansk knowledge is power on the eve of the start of the academic year, the all-russian marathon of social science started five sites from lugansk to kamchatka and hundreds of speakers, we are waiting for live broadcasts. at the zaporizhzhya npp, a motorcade is preparing for the visit of the iaea mission is already heading towards the power plant in energodar. what is on the program of the visit and what is the situation with shelling? 1 and only the president of the soviet union and a politician who changed history in the ninety-second year of his life,

mikhail gorbachev died. the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant is due to arrive and is still being shelled from the ukrainian side, according to the administration. zaporozhye per day. 60 ukrainian strikes were recorded here. one of them has the central entrance to the storage of radioactive waste of the ukrainian armed forces, used drones and artillery as well, according to the ria novosti agency, the russian military shot down one ukrainian drone near the zaporozhye nuclear power plant, according to the administration, zaporozhye radiation fund. now it's normal. there were no casualties. and now we are returning to the opening of the knowledge forum in moscow

, many guys. now they are watching us. this is also great, because, probably, it will allow someone to learn something new and learn something unusual. you, we are meeting for the first time or from you, someone has already been to the previous ones, that is, you were already excellent. i am glad to see a special one, because you and i are almost old friends talking about artificial intelligence. here is the question. i would ask germanosis, in short, but it's too late. will artificial intelligence ever gain the power of persuasion? will he be able to convince the person? or artificial intelligence will never get. he may even get at once, but he will never get consciousness. so today we will be with you

briefly, but how can we talk about the power of talent ability of persuasion. this is a talent that we probably all envy. wherever we need it in relationships between people, we all live or in our family. we need to convince our parents about something of our grandparents to defend our innocence. we need it in large societies. we are studying at school. at the institute at the university it is more, the society, and there , too, you need to tell something to someone and convince someone of your wire. this talent of persuasion is absolutely necessary for everyone. he is needed in trade.

it is needed in business. he is needed in such archival areas like charity. you must convince the philanthropist that it is here that he should, at the call of his heart, provide assistance. and you must do it. you must convince him. and, of course, it is necessary in politics. this is necessary for every politician who convinces his voters that he is right, convinces the voters to vote for him. for only he can lead them to a bright future and do it better than other competitors. this is necessary by the state at the state level, because in interstate relations. uh, this talent

is needed no less than a degree, the most complex interstate negotiations and bilateral and multilateral is a common practice. sometimes. they are quite complex. sometimes. they come to a dead end, but each time the parties compete in the power of persuasion, so this is such a piece of persuasive talent that we live every day, which we will face every day. yes, and in our topic today we also talked about the ability to convince in an aggressive situation. after all an aggressive situation is not only when something threatens you, when the danger is any situation that leads to an exit from the comfort zone is aggressive. that is, if you want to understand something, at least

everyone is sitting very comfortably now. but if you really want to hear from those who are standing here, you must force yourself to understand what they are talking about. it means you are stepping out of your comfort zone. and here, of course. e, here, for example, my task is to convince you that this is interesting what i say and what to some extent it will help you become more knowledgeable uh more experienced. and maybe at least somehow sometime use what i say in my life. and all the speakers who are standing here, to varying degrees , master the art of convincing someone to a greater extent, someone to a lesser extent, but everyone sincerely wants to share their knowledge with you with all their hearts. but is it necessary to be is it necessary to have

the gift and talent to convince, is it necessary to be born with this? both i knew both completely uneducated people who were absolutely uneducated. well-read, who knew little. but who in direct communication could make you want to believe him and do what he wants. and at the same time, there is a huge number of highly educated , delicately educated people? which you will never experience trust here is some kind of god's providence and often, it is difficult to

explain from what it all stems. but you can always learn to convince less, what is needed for this . and this, probably, probably, concerns all the incarnations that i said, whether or not for an individual, be it a big one, be it a society, then a politician always needs to thoroughly understand the topic. that is, to have knowledge, social science to have knowledge, and a thorough one only showing their awareness. you can show. do not show the feeling of being right without proving your knowledge. you cannot convince anyone. you need to have logic. and the ability to formulate because without

this you will not be able to bring your or your opponent or your interlocutor or partner to let him down to the moment when he should understand your rightness and when he wants to trust you. uh, there are schoolchildren here. yes, there are students here . here's an essay, write an essay, and not on a computer, not a summary. yes, what is on the internet? try to write as much as possible , the more you write, the better you will develop logical chains. this is how it works. if you write a little, try to formulate a little, you will do it badly. without this, it is impossible to convince someone of something. well , of course, of course. convince someone without at least

a little bit of charisma to convince someone without a little bit of adventurism in the good sense of the word. impossible, therefore always try try to do everything brightly with pressure and proactive it will always help you. and the talent to convince, like everything in our world, can be used not only for good for good. do you know talented scammers? you know, for sure, many of you have received phone calls, bank hooligans, bank scammers and so on, and all of you know you all are warned by your parents that you should not enter a pin code. there is no need to tell anyone that

no one calls from banks, but many of you still once fell for it. these people they know how to convince. this is also a talent. this is a talent that is not used for a good purpose in a criminal purpose, but, unfortunately, they possess this talent absolutely meticulously. my daughter got a daughter. she got caught last year. how many told her so on. here, and she says, it was like hypnosis. she didn’t even understand anything, how she began to call her pins and so on, and from two cards were withdrawn. that is, she was absolutely aware of her and i. and the bank representatives told her a lot and in detail what needs to be done to secure herself digitally, but sometimes knowledge wins over the power of persuasion. this is such a, uh, such a paradoxical paradoxical

thing. well, by the way, the security service of the security services of banks, then very quickly reacted to the appeal and managed to return all the money. i don’t know if these, uh, not good or good talented people were caught there or not caught, but the money was returned, so i urge you to beware of those who use the power of persuasion. uh, outside of benign purposes, this also happens. what else is needed in order to convince someone you need to have an internal lever, a positional lever, you need to have something that will allow your opponent or interlocutor to understand that if he gets this something, if he does this something, then he will feel better. he will become smarter, he will become healthier, but this is something you

should have, you should always have it. think it might to be in english in english it is called such a word, it is very, very voluminous , it is probably impossible to translate it into russian unambiguously. more what is needed in order to convince and this applies to people and states and politics. strength strength internal strength attributes of strength that show that you are strong willingness to act from a position of strength there is a famous saying reminds us, by the way, of our president. it belongs, either to the same

colt, or someone says, it's some actor said. i'm there for sure this, probably, to install impossible, but sayings you surely know that a kind word revolver. you can achieve more than just a kind word. therefore to convince to convince without force. eh, well, sometimes it works out, but still, with the manifestation of this pressure, it’s always good. watering politicians are those who use, uh, the power of persuasion and try by any means to get the talent of persuasion for their political career, without this it is impossible to build someone who has a natural talent. someone is trying to get it just for populism, because that for the purpose of populism in politics. this is the power of persuasion. uh, obsessed with trying to capture the emotional moment in speeches,

obsessed with oratory, this kind of hybrid phenomenon is also very widely used , uh, well, it lives all the time, see many parties, many leaders of political parties in all countries of the world. uh, especially now that's a little modern europe they come to power for a very short period. they are very rarely re-elected because they promise a lot of things, but even at the moment when they promise a campaign, they know that they will not be able to fulfill most of it. this is populism. but there is a party on the contrary. they exist in our country and in other countries of the world. uh, parties that try to base their promises on the achievements that have already been made by parties that emphasize their responsibility to a party

that says that even uh, leaving the political arena. we will still be responsible for all our steps, this is the force persuasive, obsessed with e on responsibility, it has much more promising plans in terms of the political future. well, since to the conclusion. i want to read to you in conclusion of this confusing speech. i want to read you a little, uh, try to show you. uh, this is the power of persuasion and oratorical power, when it is all crazy and everything, when all this is called, when all this is called to make people not to force, invite people to believe and become

in solidarity with the ideas of those politicians who perform. i read so first of all. let me state my firm conviction that the only thing we should be afraid of. it is that fear, it is fear itself. nameless, unreasonable , unjustified horror that paralyzes the necessary efforts to turn a retreat into an offensive. who do you think said it? stepping out of your comfort zone? try to think with these words. this has been said recently. no, it was said long ago in 1933. this is what franklip roosevelt said in

his innovative speech. then in america and the great recession was almost everywhere in the world. gdp fell by half over 35% unemployment went through the roof. people had nothing to eat, they had nowhere to work and nowhere to live. and here is the transfer of this emotion, it was designed to convince people that you need to get out of this zone, not comfort, but you need to do something to get out of this crisis. this is roosevelt, then it's very cool. here are the wordings. read on a little bit difficult hard. i have nothing to offer but blood. toil of tears and sweat is our policy you ask what is our

purpose? i can answer in one word, victory victory at any cost, victory despite all the horror. victory no matter how long and difficult the path is, for without victory it is impossible to survive bravo forty year churchill speech in parliament you feel the territory you feel the territory this uplifting rhetoric, right? it is eternal, especially now. especially for us. the same churchill, by the way, also very convincingly spoke in the forty-sixth year with his famous fulton speech, he prepared it for 3 years. by the way, he prepared it for 3 years, when slava

the great patriotic war or, in the understanding of churchill, the second world war? he already wrote a speech about how to declare the iron curtain then it was fultan. he announced the iron curtain. it is very interesting and always. i think it's very good to know. there were many such speeches, but, probably, the most famous comrade citizens, brothers and sisters, soldiers of our army, the fleet, i appeal to you. i, my friends, are in serious danger over our homeland, victory will be ours. bravo , bravo, the beginning of the war, stalin, he spoke many times in time of war, but you see what spiritualization. what is the energy in these words to all the many millions

of people in our country? it's brilliant. just from my point of view. this is where the power of persuasion lies, this is the very talent that cannot always be explained. come on, we're still from a foreign country. in the long history of the world, only a few generations. was given the role of protecting freedom in the hour of maximum danger. i will not shy away from this responsibility, i welcome it, and therefore do not ask what your country can do for you. ask what you can do for your country? bravo kennedy it's not alice, you define everything there, no? bravo

great kennedy is 61 years old and the opening speech and said, then these beautiful words. do you know what? the danger, where in communism is in you and me. that's what he said, then he spoke beautifully about us. and he also lives this message, he is now alive and he is alive for us. and of course, what is closest to me and what i admire the most. the cold war ended, but it did not end with the conclusion peace. understandable and transparent agreements on the observance of existing or on the creation of new rules and standards gave the impression that the so -called winners in the cold war decided to put the squeeze on the situation and reshape the whole world exclusively

for themselves to suit their interests. and if the established system of international relations of international law, the system of checks and balances, prevented the achievement of this goal, then it was immediately declared worthless to be obsolete and subject to immediate sleep. putin well, of course, putin munich is valdai this is valdai 14 year munich speech you need to read it all, you understand, here i advise you just from time to time when questions arise, what is going on to read putin's munich speech read munich because with such a force of persuasion, for me it's cooler than nothing no, i'm just inviting you to do it. that's just the question. here they appear before you ask someone. open

putin's munich speech, it's not about confrontation. he warned he called to political wisdom their opponents. we couldn't convince. but we could not convince, but not because we do not have the talents of persuasion. putin has a wonderful talent for persuasion. too bloodthirsty unfriendly were the listeners of this speech. and in conclusion maybe it will be a little long, but still. you can not play and manipulate words. in international law, in international affairs, each term must be understandable, transparent, must have a uniform understanding, uniformly, understood criteria, we are all different and this must be treated. with respect, no one is obliged to adapt to one model of development recognized somehow once and for all. the only correct one. we all know that after

the end of the cold war. everyone knows this in the world, a single center of domination has arisen. and then those who were at the top of this pyramid were tempted to think that if they are so strong and exceptional, then they know best what to do. and therefore, one does not need to reckon with the un, which often, instead of automatically authorizing to legitimize the desired decision, only hinders, as we say, gets underfoot. do you have any idea what you've done now? this is also putin, this is putin who spoke at the united nations general assembly for the fifteenth year. and this is a performance. i also ask you to add it to the favorites and this is what you need to re-read to understand the essence of what is happening now in the world and the essence of all our efforts. on this i

want to shut up. more precisely, do not be silent all the same. yes , without your help. i will not cope for the lecture of our speaker. so, i already see the hands of friends, volunteers please help us and pass the microphones. here , please introduce yourself, and your question is dmitry sergeevich dmitry sergeevich my name is samsonova elizaveta i am a representative of the pskov region at this educational marathon and, starting from life experience, convictions are often based on manipulation on the game with fear, feelings of guilt, but don’t you think that this is dishonest, and in general e is fraught with bad consequences. well, er, the criteria of honesty and dishonesty are hardly applicable here. we are all with you we face manipulation when trying to convince

someone, most often those who have some unscrupulous urges face manipulations, but on the other hand. well, let's just say harmless manipulation. they have been and will always be, so treat this with understanding. uh, for every persuasion power there is a persuasion circuit power. use them. thank you thank you. good morning. my name is anna kostyakova, i'm from the peter the great st. petersburg technical university, dmitry sergeevich. i have such a question. is it true that there really are so-called negotiators who can convince even terrorists to surrender, or is it just like in the movies , and if such a profile is among your acquaintances, it’s true, there really are professional negotiators. they are in all our power departments. these are really people who

understand the subtlety of human nature in human psychology. and these are really people who uh can stop a person from some reckless move or who can help to prevent tragedy is the heroic people. no one knows them by sight, but they are all heroes. thank you , hello, dmitry sergeevich, my name is milana, i am a representative of the republic of karelia and my question is that they say that one person has less chance. uh to convince someone of the theme of the collective. that is, if you want to learn how to convince, then you need to adhere to the opinion of the

majority. no, i don't agree with this. it depends on the charisma of the person. it depends on the degree of responsibility of the person. after all, you are using to convince me in the most-most such difficult situations. look now. hmm, we've been burning a lot lately. yes, we have natural fires, which, by the way, this year were much less emotional there. yes, who could smell the smoke in the center of moscow, but there were much fewer fires, after all, the effectiveness of the fight against these fires with this natural phenomenon. uh, the necessary measures are being taken, but i remember when putin was prime minister. that was also the year when there were fires, and he arrived, he arrived in strength. this there was such a big force enough that it

burned to the ground, and he communicated, he communicated with the inhabitants of this village, which naturally were. in the most difficult condition, in the most difficult, they lost everything, they lost their housing documents. uh, schools for kids. uh food clothes today. and putin is one putin is one. uh, he convinced them that in literally 2 months everything would stand, and he did it. but in order to have this power of persuasion, one must not only figure out what we are implementing? what is not? you still need to have a background in terms of trust. and here is putin. this run is a well-earned and very very strong one. people know that if he speaks, he does it. in such a situation, a person can be alone, that is, it was not necessary to bring in a thousand builders, a team and builders . thank you again. hello, dmitry sergeevich my

name is shorokhov daniil i am a student of the kutafin moscow state university of law. ah. you know, i have a long-standing dream of a personal meeting with the head of our state, and my question is directly, in fact, connected with the uh blabah of the state. here and hmm you know mine question. even, probably, much sadder, because it touches. uh, a very significant figure in our history. this is mikhail sergeevich gorbachev , who, unfortunately, passed away this night . so i would like to know my question, but it is related to how it has changed, in general, the science itself is a belief, maybe there are some specific examples, uh, similarities, uh? based on the examples of

persuading uh in the confrontations that we have now and were then during the cold war, that is, there may be some differences, or similarities. uh, after all, as you know, mikhail sergeevich us, in fact, in many ways. a-a showed his power of persuasion, and during the cold war and just like now, our president shows his power of persuasion in this aggressive environment. thanks to. ah well, mikhail sergeevich gorbachev, who really passed away yesterday, is a statesman who will forever remain in the history of our country. many argue, that's the role he played, but that he was an extraordinary person. a unique person is definitely known, remembered and will be

remember all over the world is also a lot of controversy. take , for example, the end of the cold war. yes gorbachev gave impetus to the cold war. i wanted to believe that it would end. and a romantic eternal romantic period will come, between the new soviet union. and the world and the west, the collective west, as we call it? this romanticism did not justify any romantic romantic period and the honeymoon century did not work out. uh, the bloodthirstiness of our opponents proved to

be good, that we realized it in time and understood the president. this morning i sent a telegram of condolences to the family and friends of mikhail sergeevich, this is really a great loss for all of us as far as the power of persuasion is concerned. history does not accept the subjunctive mood, therefore, to talk about, but if it were so then today it would be different, and if it were like that, then today it would be impossible according to the third, we can only and must know our history in detail and everyone should have your own point of view about what was good, what a was bad, and what was unsuccessful, but in any if so, this is our history, which we are proud of and will always be proud of, because it is a

great story. in addition to communicating with those guys who are present, we have in the hall. there is also an online large audience and the guys ask their questions. here come on, if we display one of them on the screen. do you agree with this expression of conviction - this is not the beginning, but the crown of all knowledge. well, rather agree than no, rather agree, because that's how we talked to you, to try to convince someone. well, mostly except for some uh, unique e manifestations still need to have knowledge. you need to thoroughly understand what you want to convince your opponent, therefore, yes , knowledge is here. primarily. thank you, thank you. and now let's ask the next questions of the audience, please. please give me a microphone right here, but let's have a young man already with a microphone, and

then we'll move here okay? hello dmitry sergeevich my name is zagar ivan igorevich i am a third-year student of the moscow polytechnic university, and i came to you in the past in september, i requested that my parents be awarded the order of parental glory, and i am very grateful to you that you fulfilled my request and my parents. the president awarded it , the president of the president performed it , gratitude to you for carrying it yes, and for the fact that in june the awarding of the order took place, and in may there was an award by the president with such parents. you can be proud. let's all pat. e. from us you have a gift book from our family. here is my mother, mother , a yoga teacher, so we invite you, visit first. thank you so much. i won't

donate. i don't like fucking, but my wife does. well, you can do it right. thank you very much dmitry sergeevich have a nice day. thank you. we will now return to the hall. let's now one more question from online. he leaves empty-handed. i am ready to come every time, and we are happy to. let's give one more question from online to children, it is much easier to agree with each other than for adults in children's diplomacy. there is a future for people's diplomacy , children's diplomacy for representatives of culture. uh, humanitarian, there is a future, there must be a future and indeed. eh, children, not getting along, with each other is easier, easier to know faster.