well, lenin came in the seventeenth at the age of 47. well , of course, but at 57 he was different there, and there is the average life expectancy. i even i even about other things lenin died at the age of 53 people. yes, yes, and gorbachev only headed the country for 57 years, but still it was a decade younger than the people around him was the old man. yes, because he was 10 years older than the members of the police, grandfather lenin was conscious. here it was anyway. come on, the old man was not because grandpa lenin was because he was 10 years older than the other members of the polyliters, well gradually, gradually, it suddenly became clear that, well, again, it’s a burden to me personally that mikhail sergeevich has lost. a very strange decision of the personnel policy, and suddenly we began to see how the power slips out of our hands, and then such a kaleidoscope and you look and you begin to not understand. where is my

homeland? it is no coincidence that on the one hand, they showed you everything that westerners are now printing, and on the other hand, here is mikhail sergeevich on december 14, 1616, in an interview, i argue nevertheless. didn't want any otherwise, so that we do not get a civil war. and everything was on the brains could represent if the split. and the struggle for power in the country is just oversaturated with weapons. nuclear case this means that gorbachev is in order to stay in power. went to that's it. people how much

ruined the destruction of everything? no, they don't allow it. and my victory is that i left power. i worry that there is no proper understanding. this or my plans for my actions in the country. both for the country and for the world, our solution is perestroika opened the road turn made. the direction of cooperation the direction of peace the preservation of peace, i now regret that i could not bring it to the end in a different way. here in the movie brother 2, perhaps, the most

accurate description of how the people reacted to this, which manifested itself in the elections of the ninety-sixth year, when gorbachev gathered a humiliating number of votes in their support. where is your country, son? i gave up gorbachev and the homeland of an american to hang out beautifully, and now your homeland two wars and crimea pissed off the russian people in the baltics surrendered the serbs in the balkans. today, the motherland is where the ass is warm, and you know it better than me. sergeevich lavrov spoke about gorbachev's reaction from the west to his death. you have seen how now these western figures, who are now glorifying the era of rapprochement between east and west after the cold war, while declaring themselves the winners in the cold war. a few days ago, they participated in another coven called the

crimean platform, during which they hysterically demanded that, as they say, crimea be returned to ukraine to stop the aggression, the occupation, and so on and so forth, very uh, you know, there are many battles of coincidences in history. it just so happened that a few days later mikhail sergeyevich, the first and last president of the soviet union , died. , how did this happen i was in ukraine he said that he was a ukrainian his wife was he his russian wife was a ukrainian said that for him there is no difference no one said that ukrainian lands. especially here, eastern ukraine has always been russian lands , mikhail sergeevich said in an open interview, and

only within the framework of the soviet union did ukraine receive elements of the state. and when the collapse of the soviet union occurred, which he was very hard going through. as you know, he recalled this in that very interview and said that the bialowieza agreements to leave the soviet union were all triumphant, that we would now take away gorbachev's power and he stressed that no one thought about crimea which is russian historically according to all laws of justice. that's when they sang in the paid halva sergeyevich world politics with the western idea. they ignore these statements of his, which by and large go. in line with the same analysis that is given in president putin's articles, this is an obvious double standard. and this is a clear desire to use the name of this person,

including after he died for their own geopolitical purposes, while the peacemaker website has already happily published photos of mikhail sergeevich, he was brought there in the sixteenth year, just for this it was crossed out with the inscription liquidate. that is, these scoundrels are ready to stomp on labor. you know. but he was the president of my country. he didn't sign her collapse no. but he did not arrest the bastards who ruined it. he decided to leave so as not to start a civil war, but the civil war was already blazing on the territory of the soviet union, we already had sumgayit, and it was already difficult for us in tajikistan. we already had vilnius, we already had tbilisi on fire. so look scary.

he was obliged to arrest the conspirators in belovezhskaya pushcha. in my opinion, a history always remains a record. the last head of the great power 290 million at the peak, yes, there was 1/6 of the land. there are 140 and 1/7 left. and the tragic nineties that were the bomb was planted. a weak-willed decision, probably a good person. indeed, one of the most beautiful love stories is the story of mikhail sergeevich without a doubt. above statesman we are waiting for new ones. how wisely did the ancients speak? and dead? or good or nothing but the truth? well

, the truth must be told and i don't understand how the president of a great country even left his post. can act in commercials. or something else, i looked at it all and thought. well, it shouldn't be. well, it just shouldn't be. i will repeat to you, now once again this advertisement for a pizza hut, by the way, pizzahad, in my opinion, has already left russia . this is gorbachev. thanks to him, we have new

opportunities. stability yes, thanks to him. there was this idea photo showed. but this is a biblical story. when did you sell? for lentil chowder primogeniture head of the world's greatest

hand 16.5 percent of world gdp in many ways second in many ways first but i'm not ready, at least not for the next nine. you can discuss gorbachev mikhail sergeevich as a person and as a politician for forty days, i knew him too well for at least 10 years from 90 since 1991 , i regularly communicated with him. why did the private setting of families fly with him abroad?

the feast in close with him was very good. i said we had friendly relations with the merts. eh, i didn't have to. if i found out that a person is a scoundrel. yes, so, here, uh, i taught my humble ones in it, i then had the opportunity to support him after this resignation, and there are living examples of this, he helped my independent newspaper very significantly in difficult times. uh, so uh i 'll talk about all this someday, but not now, so i want to. since the questions are hanging, but before there was such a

genre of comparative biography. caesars, as a rule, but we will talk, i will talk don't waste your money on neighbors. and we are just from the caesars . there is such a city, simbirsk in russia now ulyanovsk is called in the second third e of the xix century, and there, uh, was born and studied in one of the gymnasiums, either the first or the second was called uh, the boy volodya ulyanov the director of the gymnasium was a certain peter kerrinsky, and a little later alexander sasha kelinsky studied at the same gymnasium. and the trustees of the educational district of the entire simbirsk, maybe something else was included there, really a state councilor. and then this is the rank of general,

but civil, uh, so nikolai is the very ilya nikolaevichavyanov, in general, we have not studied. here is the simpersk phenomenon. this school this city gave two leaders. in russia, i know if there is anywhere else like this . that is, i wanted to say something, but i was stumped to return, and by those years it means that the first head of the interim government of prince lvov was almost forgotten there. eh, modern. e. you can at all, yes, you haven’t heard from such a person, so after all. he got russia, well, not in

a luxurious state, but all the same, the collapse of the industry of the front began, everything, and by the autumn the power falls out. everyone laughs. power falls over him and then the older graduate of this gymnasium vladimirovich ulyanov lenin takes this power. and the moment of his actual departure from the real politics of everything with the disease by the age of 22. is that the end is a burden 6 years 6.5 from 85 to the ninety- first year we get from a collapsed empire the soviet union began victory in the civil war. uh, the beginning of the renaissance of industry and so on, and our country becomes, by the way,

light than two tens of millions of people, or maybe billions of uh people living there then, in the globe. here are uh two lives here is a comparative life description of two people who gained power in russia in about one of the historical period. and one was able to do both lawyers. both received a higher education, he was, in general, an agreed stratum of the then tariffs. the role of the personality of this story, or something else, but this is the result. in one case, we see docking's passed, really until the eighties, or something, about 92 years old, who remembered him. by the time that in the usa where he lived, what is here in russia in textbooks there, yes, what was he to remember. this is so special.

a mausoleum was erected for lenin. it was a deprivation, uh, there then in the automatic transmission, but sorry, it was supported by the masses of the people, so they put up a mausoleum for lenin, and no matter who, so that this ingenious great politician builder has not yet spoken to destruction russian empire. he put a little uh hand, of course, he wanted to overthrow uh, destroy this one, stop, denounced and so on, but not him. e, the first of those who shook to the end. eh, the foundations of the foundation, destroyed for many years, and how could theoretically practically and quite practically decompose the army, as much as they could. here are

parallels comparing the historical real of our history, no abstract, no ancient greek, no roman and american, no latin american. well, i was nicholas ii, a very good man and very fond of his wife. yes, and i decided do not shed blood and did not shoot the generals who came to him and other aristocratic. bastard. say that you need to sign a resignation decree. this is an actuator alexei and he could, and pavel said even you can kill me lord, but i will still remain your emperor and nicholas ii will be a very good person. he witnessed both the destruction of a great empire and terrible tragic death of his family. here is also a historical parallel. in short, he was a good man, a very good one. very good

it's better for the government. i hope, i hope that on these days, and especially on friday, when they take place, how the farewell with mikhal sergeyevich will take place will be announced earlier on saturday. well, i heard that farewell on friday, yes read, in my opinion, on saturday these days e 2 days. e, no matter who does not belong, and these people will not come there, not with their tantrums, not with fair packs, not with provocateurs, you need to bring. i hope that it will be so, and it will be it will be worthy. let's discuss, we will continue. but what about here recent events, we talked a lot about them anyway, uh, but today 5 you are reading yes, these balts, of course, but uh, well, it’s clear that you are a bastard. well

, it’s clear that everyone is for their grandfathers and they themselves would now now have hitler appeared. they went to him again, that he was a political type, he fought against hitler and fought valiantly, but they are the ones who are now leading these, well, abbot. i say, and those who, uh, are the descendants of those who were on the side of the soviet army of the soviet union, by the way, the anti-fascist movement of that time. they often sit in prisons there, because they dare to disagree with something. so. and well, this is a duck dancing. the whole of modern europe can't surprise me with anything. here today. there they were going to limit russia altogether. uh, the level of idiocy of infantilism. uh, so russia is responding with sanctions. russia keeps using gas, as a political weapon, well, nonsense.

i answered you for hitting me. why did you answer me? how dare you answer me? well, i don’t even know the children, in my opinion, they understand, and the logic of such statements or these czech republic is also known. what position, occupied mainly during the e second world war. uh, so at this time, we can't talk about tourism from the russian federation at all, this is the position of the cell, firstly, uh. i do not quite understand what the position of the czech republic means, but its current government is good. i don't understand our uh, our passivity, we seem to be worried about this , as if we are saying that why are you doing this? well, russian citizens do not need to go. uh, this very airborne forces is going through terrible. well, the airborne forces is a

different matter in special operations. wildly worries tankers check passports to see if there is a schengen or they won’t be allowed into the czech republic or the messenger i read today that there are 12 in the toilet, or 15 estonian companies asked their government to 28 28 yes, that means that they are temporarily excluded, so that they can receive. to a resource from russia now, if i were sitting in the kremlin, but i don’t sit in the kremlin please note this shortcoming must be corrected, but i’m not from st. petersburg i studied there, yes, not only now, but from st. petersburg they sit in the kremlin, so i would said yes? eat restore command. t-34 in narva she returns the pedestal. it costs 5,000 dollars or euros

there, this is an operation of the story and immediately vrubaev back. it seems to me that the time has come for russia to take such strong or strong to symbolically well, or strong economic steps and certainly don’t worry all the time, and we will now have schengen visas in the classic, like bulgakov ’s soldiers started well. and now it's finished, i would call and say who those russian companies that act as counterparties. they have to buy from someone. i am summoned him. what do you mean you trade with them? what does it mean there is still no economic and commercial blockade? nothing should go to the nazi state of this order inside navoi, but i propose to restore order. but when they were at the time

i founded mikhail sergeevich, my late father worked as an assistant, as you know, on occasion of which from time to time. i get comments like your father ruined the ussr with gorbachev. even a well-known political scientist will not now give a surname in the nineties. i remember writing such a book, where it turned out that actually the collapse of the soviet union from gorbachev shakhnazarov interestingly, such flattering, of course, i remind you that the assistant that in the ussr that in today's russia is not

a political figure and never makes decisions. so, as they say, okay, let 's note it, but nevertheless, thanks to this, not only close, but mikhail sergeyevich recognized first, i want to express my condolences. his family, his loved ones, uh, everyone, everyone, a family. uh, secondly, uh, i must say he was a good man. he was definitely a good person. he was a charming person. he was very charismatic person, very open friendly kind of saying, in the sense in this sense to say it, uh there is no doubt about the fact that you told the truth, well, either the truth. yes, well, the truth is, in fact, to know only god and people have different truths, this is how we are arranged, we are looking for that truth that someone guesses. what god knows. and, in fact, they are really different, so you can talk about mikhal sergeevich in very different ways. eh,

when you say, maybe he could arrest this agreement there from bialowieza. i couldn't. he already is as well as nicholas could not arrest those generals who came, because no one was already subordinate to him at that time, when the belovezhskaya agreements were signed, everyone was subordinate to yeltsin. and no one followed his orders, so there are historical circumstances that, so to speak, over the years, as if they go away, we forget that in general, in general, direct responsibility for the collapse of the ussr lies with boris nikolayevich, who since the eighty-ninth year, by the way, not so long ago i read the article of the late burbules literally shortly before his death, where he frankly. since 89, our team has been aimed at, as they say, withdraw the russian federation from the composition and composition of the ussr that is, it would have been supported in the eighty-ninth year, it was still

subordinate to the kgb, still subordinate, but already it, well, already it, but this is another. guo made no mistakes. i also say it’s necessary, how would they support him, and i must say that in the ninetieth year, when it was e, the supreme soviet of the russian federation voted for the sovereignty of russia, by the way, here is leonid ivanovich will not allow, probably, to lie very many members of the communist party , they voted then, which was almost unanimous belt. that's when the police, and then they became the communist party a lot of people. many people love this today. so far, no. no, they would not say, they wrote the architect through historical dzhigans in the same years. well, well, in a different way, but then there were already friends of the russian federation, i mean. that yeltsin supported a huge number of our citizens in the same way as gorbachev at the beginning , millions of demonstrations were in support of

yeltsin said this, and he led the country to collapse, but e, in my opinion, well, this is how i feel about history, this is my opinion. and as they say, whoever doesn’t like agrees who doesn’t, but in my opinion, to blame gorbachev or even yeltsin for the collapse, so to speak, that’s the great ussr that i love loved and will love and appreciate very much. well, it's like blaming it. e was such an emperor, honorius, the last emperor of the roman empire. that's the same as blaming ambition for the collapse of the roman empire. nobody remembers this arrogance. there is historical circumstances that occur in addition to, in addition to the will of historical figures. i don't believe. and in all cases, this idea of ​​being a historical figure is not acceptable. it fundamentally changes the course of history. it can influence the course of history

in the event that it falls on the correctness in the direction of such people there are in history. they seem to remain, but mountains. fell into a situation where the soviet union in my opinion, with all my love for the soviet union, he, in principle, was already objectively doomed in this configuration, and a market economy was needed. and everyone understood this, and to say this, reforms were needed. how to do it? no one knew and gorbachev did not know, but this process was irreversible. it was historically inevitable, therefore, sprinkle ashes on your head and moreover, i absolutely do not agree that the soviet soviet union fulfilled its great mission in this world and, by the way, the communist party of the soviet union it fulfilled this mission because the main mission of the soviet union was quickly modernize the country, what was done to win war with the west to defeat the west and restore the

country in that model already further. it was impossible to exist otherwise, and it was necessary to change it, it was necessary to change it as well as the national republic is already obvious. they sooner or later. they had to leave the soviet union, so to speak, those who are now trying to prove the opposite. well, try to drive back. here in the soviet union there is central asia. i'm not even talking about fishing. well, these are the countries, who someone wants, and someone from the russians wants it today here to bring it back. eh, so to speak to us a configuration. here it does not interfere. russia remains a great country-empire as before, but in my opinion. as they say, that period has passed, so the problem is mikhail sergeevich’s trouble, that is, such a trouble. well, like him, so he, unfortunately, will remain in history as the last leader of the great country, and

nothing can be done about it. here. there's nothing you can do about it. here it is, as they say, do not throw away the stories so that his supporters do not talk about what he gave there, then he really had a lot of freedom. there is the movement of glasnost, other and so on, all many things. vaughn, he really did a good job, so to speak he stopped the cold war, but history is a cruel thing honorius remained the emperor, the last emperor of the roman empire, and no one remembers him anymore, so i, for example, do not agree that this is the era of mikhail sergeyevich this era this era which is post-soviet hmm, so to speak , a period, but it continues with her, by the way, our current president, vladimir vladimirovich, he is part of this era, and it has not yet ended. she continues. and maybe, by the way, let's hope that just our president will become one of the main persons in general of this era, and the fate of

mikhail sergeevich as a politi? in this sense, in my opinion, it still remains, uh, remains a politician who was present and could not do anything about it, just like nicholas ii, you say nicholas ii is torture to arrest and shoot nicholas ii did not disdain to shoot when he could say sunday suppression in the revolution of 905 of the year. he was not absolutely an angel in that sense. so to speak, the glyansk execution, we know all this from soviet textbooks, but this is a fact, but at that moment the country was already in a state where nothing could be done about it. this is the system of the russian empire came to a state where it had to be transformed into something new. here she is right, vitaly, that is, she says it was transformed in an unexpected way into the soviet union, that is, into a new state. but that state is

gone, and nicholas ii, no matter how he says it, all the same remained, uh, in history, as a loser in the king. yes, all the same, he remained in history as the last king. eh, the tragic fate of him, of course, and of his family, but he remained in this way, therefore, in this sense, i, uh, do not think that we need today, so to speak, of course, a moment. admitted, in my opinion, and yeltsin is a fundamental mistake. in my opinion, they did not consist in the fact that the soviet union collapsed, but in the fact that neither mikhail sergeevich nor boris nikolayevich created the conditions for russia to emerge from this collapse in the best condition in the best condition. this i agree. since he did not sign , uh, the agreement with nato, and not the expansion, did not sign this paper as well as the yeltsinization, the dissolution of the rope into a responsible yeltsin could well, so to speak

, set a condition, at least crimea, and maybe the donbass could then take and put conditions in the baltic countries. they would go for it at that time to leave the russian bases in tallinn in riga and there would be no nato and leave. as they say, control over the railway at that moment they would have gone for it all. he didn't. here's what. speaking of which, i think, uh, those fundamental mistakes that mikhail sergeevich and boris nikolaevich made in this sense, but uh, on the other hand, they were products of their time and those people who both experienced this lesson which one you need to, as they say, uh, because thanks to this we now know for sure that you can’t trust the west, and we didn’t know this in the nineties in the eighties we really we really it this is not what you were at all such a mass phenomenon of the soviet

a person who believed that yes, enough is enough, we must live. this cold war must be stopped. okay? it was not that gorbachev was because of this everyone was against it. it was the natural desire of the people. and, by the way, there is no need to be ashamed of this desire, because in fact. this is the right desire to end the cold war to create conditions in europe for co what to stop? as they say, uh, endless rivalry were the right ideas, but unfortunately, now this experience shows that you can’t trust and what he says correctly is that the baltic republics , this one i read, the defenses of lithuania well, they gave you an example of independence and gave everything, oh, which they did not fight. and now he calls this man a criminal, he calls gorbachev a criminal, a man who was one of all along with yeltsin. actually yeltsin. the first

admitted, as far as i remember formally, but formally. yes, informally. he first recognized he recognized when he became president of russia he recognized, this is the 89th first thing he did he recognized the baltic mountain ash of independence in the baltic republics. it was he who generally admitted it even gorbachev tried. something there to twist something could not do anything. well, in general, you understand the attitude, here. break into advertising, but feed with all the love, and when the people? was he in a position that the authorities listened to him, that the people of imperial russia or what? i wanted nicholas ii not to exist or the soviet union, remember the people of the ussr how they voted, they voted so that the soviet union would remain a hairline wording, incomprehensible in new form. it's all there, too, a little volodya well , it's turned upside down, of course, firstly, part of the soviet people did not vote, part of the republics did not vote. this is also a fact, then it is, as

they say, on the one hand. they voted for the preservation of the soviet union on the other hand they voted in ukraine for an independent ukraine why do i lead so when we give an argument whether the people want it or not, it's for the politician? this is of course very important, but we must lead. i don't say lead the chief, the lesson that was learned from this is that in russia the power can be any but weak. sophie can be anyone but weak, and when we talk about the fact that we did not know that the west was a deceiver, the question is to all the institutions that worked, when we talk about why gorbachev did not succeed because which policy gorbachev was politely speaking, don't think the most. and why was she thoughtful, because until the last moment he did not understand what he wanted to do. there was no specific plan laid out clearly clear there was no theory of what he wants to do. this is also a very serious question. and when he deprived the communist

party of the soviet union of the status that was laid down in the constitution, then, of course, instantly the entire structure of the soviet union went limp and collapsed. he decided too. well, you remembered how he decided. it was yeltsin's ultimatum; he could not do anything right away . this is a weak power, when yeltsin was a weak person, it was more honest then in the eighty-seventh year to say, i tried. i can't do anything. i'm retiring. she is near. we have the chinese took the islam party was strong. and why was she not strong, she was strong on him , because he worked, collected for some time. watched relied on the people as well here, because mao zedong did the cultural revolution before that and did the purge of the party we could and tried to make the faction tried to choose. why re-gang four enrolled again, so you

think it's so easy to purge the headquarters of such a country. well, wait for the scale. china it was exactly a different situation was the fact the facts remain a fact, the great soviet union was a fact, it does not exist, and so far this is all that we see. these are the consequences of the collapse, this is what is called here. after that, we will live with this feeling all the time, failure today is easy and transfer it to our youth. this is better than russia, of course, but in order for russia to become all the time we instill this feeling that we are losers from the west , they emphasize this to us all the time. you are losers, we were so lucky that the soviet union collapsed, there is the russian federation, we must talk about this the russian federation is our motherland, we must preserve it. we must be some kind of positive and where

all the time to wake up your head with ashes, well, guys, it’s impossible all the time, where the border of our motherland ends, as it was said, vladimir vladimirovich putin at the russian geographical society , the borders of russia do not end. please, i felt that you want to rush into battle right away. well, i want to be there, how much i have worked with mikhail sergeevich for the last 20 years, here is our last common book. i want to show you give in the nineteenth year. she left, after that he was sick. everyone writes there. somewhat abstractly of his illness. but the bottom line is that he continued to be conscious all these years. but as they say, we have gathered today

on the day when, as it is customary to speak in russia about the dead, either it’s good, or you add nothing, i don’t add anything other than rights. this is an accurate quote, therefore. there is we increasingly-??? stop on personality. and what did he do? i want to refer to the old tradition of putin giving putin an assessment. for she was unexpected to me and noted that he was a great statesman and statesman who had a huge impact on the course of world history, he did not actually decipher. in his time, from the external point of view of foreign policy, he made actions that few people did before him and after him. i mean the end

of the cold war. i mean, a transition to destruction that has improved people's lives. it is no coincidence that he was given the nobel prize, unlike some other presidents. i mean in the usa who were given more fighting. but what did he do? besides, what did he do? influence on the course of world history in the external plan, i recall, under him the war in afghanistan was stopped, which claimed more than 15,000 of our soldiers in 10 years in 10 years, right? i don't think they really have to. it was a political decision. all decisions are political at the top yes, but not all of them are forced. finally, he took another step, which almost does not notice today do not talk about it. he went on he went

to china in order to see good relations with china and today's good relations between russia and china including if his contribution. we can talk a lot about foreign policy gorbachev of course like any other person. but as i said, he is already highlighting what is having an impact today on the course of history. in particular, gorbachev managed to achieve those peace treaties that today hold back the arms race, the race that can lead to destruction, much has been and is being said today in connection with the military operation. what is possible, the use of nuclear weapons, replacing it sounded so strange. this is after thirty years of the use of nuclear weapons, and

not only that, they said that these are nuclear weapons. it came out, an order was given to put it on combat duty. it means that there is a huge step back. what is the reason? the reason is that relations , compared to the gorbachev era, have deteriorated sharply between the two large countries, i mean russia and the united states. well, in general, the whole west is east. this is what concerns the external, now the internal policy makes sense to decipher. and why suddenly they worsened all the promises that were given, gorbachev west is not emissions. now a few words about gorbachev's internal politics, but you all probably remember, i think that your age allows you to do this, how you met mikhail gorbachev who

proclaimed the idea of ​​perestroika. what is the essence of this idea of ​​restructuring. it's simple enough you don't need to write. there, in this regard, he proposed to return to the leninist line of socialism. the last years of life what it is about is about the transition from war communism. in a policy that made it possible to feed the people to get them out of the civil war, and in this respect, gorbachev went along this path , participated as a communist. he stated that the democratization of the party was needed and put forward the idea of ​​the so-called social democratization of social democracy. as such, i also participated in his activities in the future and helped towards the end of the last century. he began to create a social democratic party. which did not

last long, but the enthusiasm was a large number of people rising to be in this party was why he wanted it? oh, because next russia could not develop without solving the problem of bureaucracy, without solving the problem of improving people's lives and solving the problem of culture with its special wounds, which were, and so on. he eliminated these special frames, and in this, too, he deserved it. and where to do it, the culture of the standard of living, if he prepared everything, and where the result can be all the nineties - this was not the result. we use these results, which he accepted. i am also talking about the accessibility of culture and what results do you use for it? i have to interrupt all the time to respect, but we don't have university lectures. this is the same thing people say to each other. i think i believe you i hope i'm telling you, not all

university lecturers lecture on paper, but there is this live dialogue. we ourselves lived at that time. we came out of the time of gorbachev into the poverty of a civil war. in short, let me still prove to the end the loss of statehood, he was met at the pastor's sixth year that i said the vote. along the road black and white grass mariupol amputated the words over the skeletons dolphins and cows smoke, burnt unspoken words. let freedom ring all the bells, mariupol, the city of masha without a hand, death is killed , a new way is marked for us mary to be now not deceived. who is a culture is a chorus one grandmother

sings another. i am also a grandmother, i took it and sang, how can i roll. where the slopes are otutyuzhina. we drove the enemies away, finally the katyusha came ashore to look at the seversky donetsk

we watch educational programs and documentaries to explore the world for free without registration.

so i want to say about the last days so that there is no ambiguity. here we again apply the aryan vision to the analysis of actions. gorbachev and in general the whole soviet history of history, in general, history is the result of the activity of people, the result of the struggle of these people. if we look from this point of view, we will see that by the end of the eighties a situation had developed history, these are primarily the so-called liberals, who were headed by, oddly enough, yeltsin being a senior dogmatist in political life and philosophical terms. the second force, which also showed itself at the very end, so to speak, of history. these were supporters of the gkchp. these were not ordinary people. it was the vice president. it was the environment.

these were the people who headed the kgb and so on, what they proposed, they offered to go back. and finally, those who were consolidated with the hunchback. this third, so to speak, was strength. what they stood for they stood for saving the union by reforming it for this and passed referendum in order to start talking about this referendum, not more than 70 percent voted for the preservation of the union. unfortunately, other republics did not take this hell to a sufficient degree. i mean our fraternal republics of belarus and ukraine, they opposed and when belovezhskaya sit so to speak, when yeltsin arrived and told kravchuk, putting two documents on the table , one document, this is the preservation of the union that will be reformed by gorbachev's plan what they agreed upon, after a long more controversy about it

the book will be written city and the second plan, which he pulled out, then to the words of gorbachev do you sign this agreement to preserve the union by reforming the union kravchuk answered no, never. it was the head of ukraine at that time of ukraine, i thank the second, and not the chervin treaty, and he says, but we write out such an agreement, and the creation of the cis without the soviet union and they solved this problem within literally one day, use it was destroyed by specific people, of course, this is a certain part people, how kravchuk became the leader sergeevich was a joke in ukraine, who began a mediocre personnel policy in the regions. and that led to wild problems that were you

talking on your line. what was it like to shoot everyone, the state leader differs from the private one in that he has a vision, has to assemble a team. the team in key positions should have been people not only personally devoted to gorbachev, but who were like-minded with him . here are the specs him as a leader that the bialowieza inmates reported that they had signed an agreement on destruction. the union is not gorbachev, but bush yes, the head of the american, so to speak. uh, what happened from 85 to 1991, that in 6 years from universal love of support and from a side that, politely speaking, was not begging from hunger on the

street, did not fall in 85. we have become a country that was ready to take gorbachev out of the office. we turned into a country where there were already bandits, where the national outskirts were on fire, where the standard of living has fallen enormously where unemployment has already gone. it was all during the reign of gorbachev no, not only during the implementation of gorbachev. it exists today. today we are talking about responsibility. gorbachev that we attribute to gorbachev those conflicts that were destroyed were destroyed in a peaceful way. how to peacefully negotiate or change the peaceful way. this is yours in a peaceful way, these are the paratroopers in tbilisi in a peaceful way. this is when gorbachev gave the order to the guys in vilnius to take the tower, and then he refused them. terek judges, but they are the same by age there are adults in the position. i know my position, where is my homeland. we talked to you this morning, of course, you

expressed it very much to shoot, but already to shoot. here is your position, yes, and the position will not vote for this position. our people always vote for this position, because if well , what do you propose to do with state traitors, what do you propose to do with a traitor? well, you are the head of state. change who well in this case the herbs that are gathered in belovezhskaya pushcha to say gorbachev if the people who were in his inner circle who raised boris nikolayevich who went to belovezhskaya pushcha, talked with gorbachev and said that they would just consult on how best to reform the union , that's all, but who pulled boris nikolayevich into big politics soviet union well, it was too late. so it was before. but i remember this boris

nikolaevich who was brought in, who was raised. gorbachev did the same. in short, i was going to be out of the lens, but if i didn't say that, of course not gorbachev succeeded in doing everything; there were many mistakes . first of all, in the implementation and change in the status of the party, its possibilities failed to do so. this is also his mistake; mistakes were also connected with the activities of the prime minister. i mean ryzhkov, uh, with whom they had a very good relationship, and then they parted, because ryzhkov was against taking part of the money from the military sphere to throw it on consumer goods, which was so lacking in our society about the youth was with you i do not agree. they just wanted it and in the end one more thing that they wanted the military-industrial complex to do before, but in our country they began to make instead of tanks from a double boiler, and who needed them, but this is already the stage to do under yeltsin,

so you no, don’t they understand the additives that these ideas were and which proved to be very popular. i remember yuri, an outstanding economist, who did not find a common language with mikhail sergeevich and, like the previous projects, which, so to speak, jewish were not implemented first, because, so to speak, he did not reflect real needs, but the last as they say, he already late, i mean, and who decided that abalkin's project did not reflect real needs. i say that he gave birth, but it was already too late. no. no, i'm talking about balkin. and who decided? what abalkin did not reflect was not education. i, you said that the first one was not resolved, because it was not in the yavlin project. of course, that's why i just make the last thought, i want to say again

, of course, we must express our condolences to everyone. yes, we are discussing this thing, and i am absolutely sure that gorbachev's time will come. we will remember with only with nostalgia, but also with a desire to change our society in such a way that everything humanistic and everything reasonable would be implemented in our country borisovich and where was the humanistic? well, we all lived then, what kind of humanistic gopniks on the humanistic street? it was a completely different life, you know, now, if only i could barely restrain myself while i listened, even if you say that your friend, who was here karen, georgievich shakhnazarov, wanted, in the words of a black lord, as best, but he was prevented or failed karen talked about another historical process that led to this and did not depend, on the contrary, you expressed two completely different

approaches from people, but i will tell you honestly. i don't want to discuss. yes, but finished the korans. come on, please. why say this all the time, just now you need to say it. god forbid as you said , gorbachevism will return. god forbid, today the west , which dreams of the same weak leadership of the country, will lead to further expansion. that is why today it is very important to talk about this and about the lessons gorbachev, which i also met in my early twenties. we all believe. we believe the head of the party, the head of the state is colossal, because perestroika needed a competent setting up of the party, well , you understand, uh, soft, well, you understand, this is not leading a small enterprise or in a family, somewhere it can do something, but break up the family. at best, you were called to the leadership of the country, and when i read gorbachev already in the

ninety-ninth year, his lecture to the american university in turkey where he directly writes my goal was for the purpose of my life was the destruction of communism, of which you speak, in the ninety- nine year. i did not interrupt you with the resolution of communism - this is what i dedicated, and it is precisely my position in the party that allowed me to do this, which gives me reason to speak. these are his words. these are not my big words, which was published in soviet russia. yes, you know. first of all, slovenia is in a magazine, and there is no fake in it, because i personally talked with anatoly lukyanov. here you are you remember dan fiona, you remember that you need to recruit a team, remember stalin in this way. here he arrived, and anatoly lukyanov, who wrote about this and personally told me, here he personally told me densiopin, when he left, gorbachev said he was a traitor, he urged him not to disperse it in any

case to follow the path of gorbachev. forbidden to eat any he is a traitor for me. today i spoke with my senior comrades. so i say zyugan andrei big very serious wrote down. we are youth, we are not access. you know yakovlev restricted access to them, well, the architect at the ruins, which zyuganov wrote then. these two words characterize everything that you just said about the architect, well, he wanted ruins, but he ruined it. how are you? how are you? no. wait. now wait, and who didn’t like this idea at all, when i interrupt you, they reformat. i will tell you, as a young man, who today i am retelling to you. we are talking to him. he says, you understand leonid here is dante the divine comedy is not in vain that the ninth circle removes the most traitor

the last circle and now, based on my logic, when i say that this person said that my goal was the collapse of communism, he used all the possibilities of the party leadership for this. he is a traitor, but i never told sergeevich this, which means i remember another polyakov, far never nikolaevich. i remember this submistor to me, the last one of the last to leave was viktor nikolaevich polyakov , who was one of my teachers. he was the general director of avtovaz and then became a minister. and here they immediately invited chinese and he made candy out of cops. how much the engine worked in china in india means that, if not a betrayal, the removal of 100 members of the central committee of all ministers, shevardnadze’s invitation to yakovlev bakatino, who really betrayed here in general, and i can continue these people who recently died recently died, what

does this mean uh , bookmarks there the american embassy. what's this? how can you know this? yes? a good man, yes, he wanted the best. well, they didn’t give him, how did they not give it to you? stalin how do you like it not allowed. so you cleaned out this fifth column, otherwise it would have been in the forty-first year, you might be joking. or maybe you're not joking, that you should do everything that you offer it. and if this had not been done , where would we be in the forty-first year, if you are the fifth column, then if a person came, he changes the team, he brings the team of traitors , it means that the americans take the bureau and give it back. he betrayed the interests of the people. that's what i hoped. i also thought, well yes, yes, i am a young graduate student. well, yes, it is necessary to change something uninteresting. there, i'm even one of those who elected from several candidates for avtovazim, and then i did it in order to somehow revive the organization, i joined the party. yes, you know, there was such an upsurge at the

beginning, but when we evaluate now, this person, i realized, the role of a person who heads the state is not for me. what does he mean by weak? what does it mean he could or could not, of course, he was obliged to prevent the collapse of the country. since this country will fall into his hands. yes, now you can say, uh, your statements there others. well, i had another dikov there, for example, anatolyevich, who worked with him in stavropol when he was still the first person. he then told me in the nineties, he told me , then he led the crowd eating. he spoke everything. well, that's a weak leader. he was weak. he came, reformed everything, reformed everything, ruined everything, four kondropals. andropol learned to work. they can do it, but you understand. then he supported the leader, which walked as a system of state power, soviet power eliminates here you can make a short pause. just nothing at all. so you said that he tried to use lenin's precepts and return to lenin, but i want to draw your attention to the fact that one of lenin's main ideas was

a certain status of the party, which de facto was an order, but you also say, we are talking deer. lenin from the wording was even tougher than the party, that it should be party building. lenin paid the most important attention. mikhail sergeevich politely speaks of these questions, he did not behave according to politely polite people say to leninsky, rather, less rice has been driven out by such people as chaykin bondaré. there it is too. andrew is unknown. they were not heard . well, you see, he also gave friends. he betrayed the allies of honor, with whom he hugged him, he was also seated. where he was sitting under hitler in the same cell, even in the same prison, this khon, then drochitkov, or there this cheushevsky all the rest and ruzilsky. and so, and now we are talking about russophobia millions of people, millions of people who worked, got this very russophobia. he

there he destroyed the wall in germany, and here he built it in the russian world, he built it, he made all these decisions, including for friends and allies. he is a traitor traitor personally friends to please there, maybe it's the englishwomen or like george in which he in malta baker wrote in malta when he unexpectedly did not expect. he said, well, we will liquidate the warsaw pact. oge we can’t ask for something. this is baker talking, it's not me talking, but germany's groupings in germany are an open field kick people out, you know, and now, when they try to tell me today, come on, yes, it’s a good prehistoric process, so, uh karen yes, it ’s predestined like this was not predetermined, please give you an example of china much weaker china but it survived on new ridge, including the communist party, will now hold the twentieth congress. uh, october sixteenth. for example, that time, honestly, speak to the point that the example of the

same lenin what is predetermined? father wrote alexander iii means that he has no weak will. god mind did not give better it would be to gather. let him sit, then, well, this is not an excuse. there, nikolashka, there alexander the third decided. and here the country put forward it. and here it is for you her e for thursday. now we will agree to the fact that the yeltsin center was created. let's create gorbachev in the center. these days we must speak precisely, and therefore say, that this is such a shame and such a system that we must avoid the authorities that would bring such people and ruin russia for us, which today is in front of us on serious tests are serious test and we will now well, a good person. well, it didn’t work out. the empire should have cost, for which you say the goal of my whole life was the destruction of communism, an unbearable dictatorship over people, just to achieve it. this goal. i used my position in the party in the

country when going to the collapsed era left the kremlin or some journalists. they said it was a guess. please i will quite right, did not cry finished with cunism in europe in the american color to turkey to get involved. dawn number 2499, i'll tell you this. here is my little experience shows that the purest fake, firstly, because this is not gorbachev's style, it is in my opinion. these are pure falsehoods. he spoke, he spoke, but he did it, you know, once you understand the cpsu from the constitution, you do it without even talking. i'm talking about something else. well, simply, of course, i never spoke this phrase. this is a completely obvious fake and source. we will not be very much for the fact that he is he of the kopey constitution, they say, well, not a word. action i told you about actions, where fake is fake, maybe it's fake, but i'm telling you not to belittle. i'm just

telling you, honest all the actions that gorbachev did in addition to please. well, what kind of freedom? that's what you will do with this freedom, so he gave us freedom. he gave us all the shops can in these shops a million people. here, look, as he said, yes, the freedom necessary to live in society, it is impossible to be free from society, when they say that he gave us freedom, they understand everything is just the possibility of traveling, which we now have west is taken. well, that's why there's freedom, but when for me, when a prisedovich spoke with such a person about opening. i didn't hear you either. look , borisovich spoke about opening the archives. and as a result, a wild lie and slander went completely. heroes of the soviet era were so desecrated, when they threw our history into the trash, they

trampled on it, humiliated it, when they killed the ideology in the country, they raised a generation of mankurts, they raised the comprador plastic not only of the bourgeoisie to serve them, therefore, i say, deceive the intelligentsia young people, then it was easy, why they use it now, and bulky all the rest are privileges. that's it, everything today the whole of barvikha has already been given there. you are your followers, everything, then distributed. we also came with sincere ones, we think, well, yes, i told you to one muratov, who was there to feed komsomolskaya pravda and we came up with this experiment. but how to wake up? well, we didn’t think that all of russia in the caucasus would be washed with blood by five warriors. central asia means the baltics, maybe we forgot the nineties years, when a million people left each year, who is responsible for this? after all? this cannot be said. well, he did not succeed, but millions. these years have passed away , because they were deprived of even the books they had accumulated. well, how does a person live, how can he

support his children? here i am, and so it was in 2000 , well, the nineties. i also have two children young wife. i left. everything avtovaz was given to a private berezovsky appeared there. well, i found myself, yes , opportunities, but these people did not find millions, they died, well, from grief to the point that they could not the nineties that your gorbachev brought and i consider him a traitor and no other word. unfortunately, i can’t find a good one for him. russian traditions are still in this day in russian tradition. yes, maybe in the russian tradition, but this does not concern a person, but this, well, is not a person who brought only grief to his country and specific people in the nineties - these are the years of yeltsin but did not appear. yes, but i allowed him, it’s boris that can be brought to light, whom stalin could not allow. why did he always have a team? why is he, i often cite the example of a man-minister, he installed the energy sector yes, the portal has been 30 years old, and then he dies from a heart attack while

transporting factories there beyond the urals yes, because he found these people found, and this one found shevardnadze and i’ll curse bakatin, that means everyone else, but this betrayal this same picked up people to give further, to butter up this smell, to get this house in west germany yes, it's generally this disgrace is the same as a pizza hut. this is also some kind of house we donated a night there in germany. so, on this, everything about this should be noted that gorbachevsk died. well, yes, that is, it is his choice. i would like i would like to say about him, in short, i did not know the words, personally, i would like to say good things about him, but i have such words today. and then let me finish, and viktor alekseevich kaznacheev, who was the first secretary of the pyatigorsk city committee, then the first secretary of the stavropol city committee, then

the second secretary of the region. koma worked with mikhail sergeevich a few days later. after e the appointment of mikhail sergeevich as general secretary in the eighty- fifth year, in a private conversation, she said, all right, guys of the unions, the end, maximum 5 years. he was wrong for 1 year, but already in the nineties it was clear that the e was falling apart. and we are discussing not dead. we are discussing a political figure, so it is so important to talk about it today and in all previous years it was discussed, in fact, many books have been written about gorbachev and his entourage, and those who want to understand this, of course, can easily do this and memoir literature those people, uh, who worked with him. well, for example, leonid vadim shebarshin wrote the memoirs of many journalists pavel vashchanov, who

worked with yeltsin, but also wrote about the gorbachev era, but there is amazing historical research, for example, the untimely departed alexander vladimirovich ostrovsky st. petersburg historian wrote two amazing books of stupidity or treason. and who appointed gorbachev but there everything is spelled out very clearly on a huge number of documents, alexander wrote very deeply. interesting football will there is serious scientific non-journalistic non- journalist literature. very serious. uh, historical, but a few years ago. my colleagues and i won a grant to form a portal of russian civilization in space and time and in the global context. by the way, on the eve of the first of september. this is very important. e, a recommendation for all teachers and students, including there was a section on statesmen of russian history from all historical eras. well, it was necessary to write an overview article that would give uh

this part and i ran into a big problem. uh, and that's how i formally got out of it. a statesman is the leader of the country, who represents it inside and out. naturally. this is the president, the prime minister, the monarch , if you like, but the substantive concept of a statesman is much more complicated, because in this sense, statesmen who do not live on short-term political tasks, but think about the strategic development of their country, their personal corporate party interests. he must leave and above just put e. it is not the preservation of the motherland in history, that is, but a politician is a person who solves specific political problems, but an outstanding statesman. he looks through

history into the future. yes, that's exactly the strategic vision for saving their homeland, their country and people. here is the formal point of view of mikhail sergeevich, of course, this is a statesman. but the substantive point of view, he is a politician who, unfortunately, in many respects turned out to be exposed. like this, uh, small personal the interest of incompetence. why did he actually gather such dullness around him, uh, that revit ivanovich spoke about, but at the same time, it must be said that, of course, gorbachev was not, for all his functionality, uh, that the secretary general had. that's huge leverage. after all, everything was decided. eh, the last ones, as it were, were set by the general secretary. and he really found himself in a situation, and when they destroyed they destroyed, uh, the soviet union - this is a powerful layer of the soviet nomenclature. this is part of the state security service - this is shadow

capital and, of course, western intelligence services in particular. and if we talk about this, then one of the american intelligence officers compared our late soviet society with swiss cheese, because there were already a lot of intelligence services that worked, there were more holes than the cheese itself. but i wanted to talk about something else, that is, but, of course, about something else right after a short pause, tell me. every human being is born with five souls and every floor is a bird from all sides of me now. vyat, you need, but i don't know. who will protect her.

you are my strong warrior here to him. doesn't matter. daddy's heart soon

it so happened that for some time, really, for a short time, i

worked for the gorbachev foundation for about three months. the fact is that i studied in graduate school at the super closed institute of social sciences under the central committee of the cpsu yes, and on the basis of this institute after the ninety-first year fund was created. gorbachev did it. yes, here now is the financial academy. it is located this is a giant complex of buildings where illegal immigrants were trained, where representatives of people's democratic movements were trained, and so on, but they put me in because they reformed this structure, they put me in jail to sort out letters that came from mikhail sergeyevich, and huge bales brought letters. we had to not only sort them, but also read and e.g. as a result, hmm letters from abroad , of course, germany took the first place later, and there were quite a lot of letters from japan. apparently

this is due to the hope for the kuril islands and so on and the united states of america well, the rest of eastern europe and so on are mostly laudatory, moreover, i have i was amazed that people even invested in financial checks. we handed over these checks to the underage, that they didn’t send money, and the other part of the letters is from the country. but here are the letters. every time i came out sick just because of this room where i read the letters, because it was the scream. uh, the horror of pain, a tear, people listed their suffering, and what gorbachev brought to, the curse is natural, and so on. these are two different worlds, then i felt it as a young girl. and today i clearly understood this when i watched the news feed, like uh, western media remembered gorbachev and how, accordingly,

people reacted in the comments in the patriotic family. in general, our society has long passed a moral assessment of gorbachev. but why else did the gorbachev foundation remember, and why did i leave from there as a result to graduate school at mgimo ? which was in this institute of social sciences. mikhail sergeevich didn't need her, but what struck me most was that i didn't i could continue to work there, er, on my own problems, because in iona there was a unique special library in general. where progressively is all the literature that only the magician came out abroad, including magazines and so on. naturally. we went there, there on receipt more, there all these people fly around the soviet union, which is tass and so on, including classified information. i did not go there, and it was possible to read it, using later dissertations to a large extent. here is where my first

dissertation was made on such materials. i am i come once. uh, girls down there in the basement library. he says, lena is still closing, says tomorrow we will no longer give out anything. i say, where does it move? i say maybe it's time. she says, no, we don't know at all where it will be reformed. i say that there will also be a huge library room here, and here there will be a museum of mikhail sergeevich's gifts, that is, a chic and super-scientific place. i don't know where to do it then they said that the library was foreign literature. she'll either go to the gible. there, for sure , half was stolen, but the main thing is that you need to create your own gift museum in a way that you will admire. naturally, it was impossible to continue scientific activity in these conditions. i wrote a statement of my own free will, eh, but, uh, it's important, uh, let's not just say it, yes. e, my fate, but it is the fate of the country, about which we have already talked a lot here when we were gorbachev's

general secretary, my grandmother, who lived in the city of chirchik, the uzbek ssr came, as always to the market and on it at the entrance there was a huge inscription russian pigs. get out. this is also, uh, such personal memories of gorbachev, or uh, when we talk today about what was lost there, let's say in eastern europe and the baltics, then, this too. uh, a consequence of mikhail sergeyevich gorbachev's international politics. therefore, you need to understand that indeed our president vladimir vladimirovich quite clearly said that this man played a colossal historical role, and we are talking about in this colossal historical role. he changed the world certainly, he changed it, but in what context? what are we from this? today we have received as a result what we must complete and correct. or rather, gorbachev's mistakes

due to the death of our guys during his own due to the shelling of civilians, the death of children. tomorrow , september 1, is an amazing holiday. i always start from the first class waited and still. i'm happy to. and i'm looking forward to this day with trepidation. and i'm even afraid to think what the ukrahunta can do on september 1st. how can she behave in relations between children's institutions that are located in donetsk and other settlements that are located in the territories controlled by russian troops, allied forces, and this, unfortunately, is also a consequence of those ill-conceived things that were done under mikhail sergeyevich, therefore, as i said, our society has long gave a moral assessment of the activities of mikhail sergeevich it is necessary that now the authorities also give a moral and legal assessment of this activity between

borisovich and leonid ivanovich about whether there was this phrase is said. i did not find a direct video from istanbul, so to speak, but this question was asked to mikhail sergeevich while participating in the program with vladimir vladimirovich pozner on channel one. i hope our colleagues will not be offended if we show this small fragment. my name is olga dear mikhail sergeevich you. member of the cpsu for 21 years and they made a rapid party career and always talked about commercials for ss and you are your statement that the cpsu became the initiator of perestroika, however, in 1999 at an american university in in istanbul, you said that the goal of your whole life was the destruction of communism, if not dictatorship over people. here's how you came to this and do you think that what happened in our country in 917 was a bloody and senseless experiment. the most

important question for all of us at irkutsk university was the election campaign . presidential associate professor, came out of asking the question you said this in such and such a year. i have already mentioned. you said in such and such a year, yes you said it. in such and such a year they said it, well, so. somehow your position is unclear. yes, my position has changed. but tell us, you are an associate professor. you should know, you are asking a smart question, a very logical one. i respect it. before the revolution, lenin also said that the proletariat would fight for power with the help of e-democracy. and all power will govern with the help of democracy. did you speak with lenin, do you agree with you?

no, tell me, no, then tell me, why did lenin say in the twenty-first year? before or justifying the need for the introduction of a new economic policy. he said we allowed error. we went the wrong way. and we must radically change the point of view on socialism. this you will deny no. so, tell me, then now answer me. why do you allow lenin? everything? and damn it to me, it should be noted that gorbachev no thanks, no thanks, gorbachev reacted as if choosing everything that he did not say. he said that it was not right to be in turkey to send a lecture there. that is, it does not mean, that is, mikhail sergeevich no reacted the way you directly answered the question

no the point of view changed thank you and that’s it published therefore. he confirms what he said is a fact, and everything else is a lyric. '86 at the professional meeting we have the service of the ministry of the interior. i expressed my opinion that the actions that gorbachev is carrying out give me an impression. he wants to compare communist power to the parquet of power and drastically weaken and lower the role. it was strange, we hear. but it was evident from his actions. his

closest associate whom he brought is one of his people. corrupt scumbag who rarely can find, the current tragic position of the chest on his account. it's because of him because of his politics. he invaded georgia in this catastrophe. everyone else is after him. a man of genius was at the head of the two countries and both countries. the first soviet must be said, we are gorbachev from the very beginning. we had a goal to dismantle. soviet power. but we expected it to take 12 years. we are not to blame that everything collapsed after 6 years. well, he set a goal. that is, it’s not only because

he said that he was happy, it’s what gorbachev did and something that here confirmed quite calmly. i look at his activities at what he did from the outside. what is the duty of the head of state, what did he do and what are the results ? what did he do? here they spoke with enthusiasm. he got better. relations with the west of detente, due to which he expected all the interests of the soviet union did not leave a single stone unturned without even entrusted to him voluntarily as a gift. of course, this is how peace can be achieved. any country

that surrenders, it surrendered. yes, she is hostility. he brought the soviet army to the handle. what did they do with the soviet army with officers and soldiers, leaving them hungry in the field without anything? what blow did he deal with the army? and he did not unite germany, this is a delusion. there was no unification of germany; there was the destruction of the gdr and the absorption of the gdr into the federal republic of germany. germany, and still people in eastern germany feel like second-class people in this

germany, they are still despicable osts. do more than a percent of management positions in all companies in east germany from the west do not trust them? and angela merkel is an exception, that is, and there was nothing to be done. he did not defend the interests of russia, he simply gave them away, he did not even sell them. he gave it away, threw it away, it didn't matter. he was afraid of blood, he covered the soviet union with blood. i know that, we worked in these places. we saw that there happening. from tajikistan to transnistria, all the conflicts that today on the territory of the former soviet union began in his period with his devouring. when he was approached in baku

tense situation? what to do, it doesn't matter, he had an important conversation with margaret the wheelbarrow. and he didn’t care about people , he didn’t care about the russian people , the soviet people. their interests did not draw him, the head of the country does not care about the people. he did not believe in these people. why did he go west, he did not believe that the people of the soviet union were the people of russia he has the strength to solve his problems himself, then he gave everything to the west. you will solve our problems. how can such a person at all? how can you evaluate it? board, i remember, i came to the soviet union in 88. i was shocked. i left in sixty- nine. i could not imagine that a store in moscow could look like this, that the country was brought to

starvation, who brought it? mikhail sergeevich and the army and the state, and then he says to me they came and told me. who are you? are you the head of the country? or you are an academic professor who received a message whether you have power or not, power, he was incapable of governing. he didn't know what management was, he didn't have any ideas. except for one of my own, i am as a person. and my place on the world stage is outside of russia, and therefore today if you look at who praises him the most, the more they are enemies of russia, the more they hate russia

, the more praise, only they. none of the people who care about russia inside russia will not say a kind word. and the chinese comrades are right. nevertheless, it began with his visit, because the students approved by this man's visit said, we will take to the streets. and the authorities will not dare to disperse us. but she didn’t listen to you, because the republic of china was more important to them. to offend comrade gorbachev, they came to tanki square and they saved china. and at that time he gave his advice, he, who ruined his country, came to china . give them advice too. so why be surprised how they with what contempt they treat him with no

less than they treated some sergeyevich well , there their scores were met with gorbachev. yes i met. i had a conversation with her at 2:00 in 1986 in 1986. i came back, but it's interesting to speak, what do you understand now? i can tell what i saw, born in the city of moscow, the soviet union at an early age, realizing that being a jew, he wants to live in israel, having obtained official permission from the soviet country to leave the soviet union, who left for israel

, served in the israeli army, fought valiantly. yes, those who served the structure related to secret intelligence services intelligence in intelligence, onslaught, yes, the rank of our lieutenant general, who since the eighties has been actively engaged in the fact that he took jews out of the hot spots that arose through the fault of gorbachev so that they would not be among the victims there, while he has been retired for a long time and expresses his point of view, which is not i like many in israel i like many in russia i don’t like many in america, but with my life i have earned the right to tell the truth, regardless of the rank of title and statehood, therefore kedmi receives a pension from the state, israel for which he fought and tells the truth. it took 2 hours for what he sees and what he knows very well after a conversation with him,

you understand why the jews were not allowed out of the soviet union, here are the communists because they did not let them out, and i tell everyone, why should normally good people who have been educated are not allowed. why should they release them? here, on the contrary, there was a whole lot in the region pursued and driven out by the germans. there spaniards jews. those are the ones you condemn. what are you condemning? it was necessary to keep such people in the ussr, they tried not to managed. i forced them to issue me an apology that it took them too long to make sure that it was better for the soviet union to give. but after this conversation, i asked him for 2 hours. he spoke for 2 hours. i came to israel and they asked me, well, what is your impression, what was i saying, i 'm sorry to translate what i said, i don't

understand how such a nonentity was allowed to rule the empire. how is such a person? became the head of the state narcissistic 2 hours. he told me in 1986 how his loves the people, as now in the elections. he will win them. how is he right? and all the time it was the speech of a narcissist. and i saw i knew great what was happening on the street. who absolutely does not understand. in what country does he live among what people does he live? what is the international position and this man was supposed to rule the country, he did not destroy the soviet union destroyed the soviet union , he did not fulfill his task. he did not complete his tasks. saved and all of his non-conception bukkat, what

he said on the first day when he came to the kgb i came to destroy this organization, he told everyone. as a general and an officer, i came to destroy the security service and well, glory. god failed him. he did a lot of damage. well, the same as schwarzene. so it’s impossible to say anything good about gorbachev based on the results and his actions. but now i want something completely different. it's coming these days. uh, the mgt delegation is already arriving. and why and why did russia call them? and why does russia need it, what

result are they waiting for? it might look like as if scattered, despite the fact that there are russian troops are helpless to solve the security problem. this is how it looks all over the world that magata will solve this problem. they don't talk about this issue. of course not, so why did they bring them. why were they allowed to enter, what do they want from them? they can provide a solution. god forbid, but it's close , let's say, right? remove your troops. we'll decide here. this will be the best indicator of russia's helplessness even in these territories. and the last thing i want to say. how can you carry out

in the country a referendum without holding a denocification? how could we already hold elections in germany without decification? how can a referendum be held in any region in ukraine without denocification for at least a year or two. after it begins , a referendum can be held, otherwise it is useless . it is very easy to brainwash people. and those who have been brainwashed for 30+ years, especially 8 years. now you want to hold a referendum among them. and who needs it who recognizes no one and never only in order to formally hold. insofar as it

insists that international law is higher than the rules of which, that our country constantly defends the position that international law is higher than between the rules that are invented in the west, therefore, of course, referendums should be held and unconditionally. so to speak, the founder is that these areas these regions will pass. under your sovereignty, whether your russian sovereignty or sovereignty with will, the influence of the local population they recognize as it was done in kosovo. it is the western public or does not recognize who lives by the rules, as it is known that the gentleman makes the rules if he loses these rules to me. it is the americans who follow us. as a matter of fact, we really don't give a damn, we're defending the right. in the end, to work backwards in order to

satisfy the desire of washington, london, paris, it’s already necessary to completely give a damn about it. for us, the opinion of those people who are now more important are located in beijing, delhi and other capitals of states friendly to us. therefore, i think that this should be carried out and the mission of the devil too, that it should be from us every day, that the observation mission will assess the true situation. where are the shots coming from anyway? i am also sure that the one who arrives there will not evaluate it that way. the task is solely to monitor compliance with the protocol. that is, they kind of see poorly, they don’t let them out there, but if not only for one day russia fulfilled the conditions, she showed what she had here there is nothing to hide, and we will do it there by inviting westerners, as for gorbachev, who evaluates here, in general, a political leader is always

evaluated in the historical context to which he exists, but now he says empty, we will try constantly. well, let them try, because even then, in which the state turned out to be, we will talk more about this state. well, that is a year, yes. here is the death of mikhail sergeevich gorbachev on the one hand, yes, well, exactly in 4 months. this is what we would if if the soviet union had not collapsed, we would have celebrated the creation. you held 30 december 22 and third. yes, i can imagine what the soviet union would be like before this anniversary, and the fact is that there may not be guilt here, even resentment. and i don’t consider gorbachev a traitor; i’ll count a person who found himself in a situation where his position suppressed him, that is, not a little hat, he did not correspond to the position he occupied. it's absolutely perfect.

residents of the holiday village of markonievo, like all normal people, want to spend evenings in a circle families watching tv. but the constant power outages cause a fair risk anger that's how it happens look? good evening everyone. here we look at everyone's hands. so, not everyone ran yet.

but they are talking about schwartz, i will not say corrupt not corrupt, but how can you appoint ministers of foreign affairs in the most difficult conditions, when you lead turning events in you between world politics there is a person who does not know a single foreign language a person who does not

have experience working with foreign delegations from foreign powers. how can such a person be appointed? you only in one case, if you yourself take this role, that is, you are the head of state. you want to be the chief diplomat. then, probably, it is possible, but gorbachev did not have this experience, therefore, if he absolutely agrees, it was capitulation in the cold war - this is war. now, i keep proving that all the time. you see , a hot war, it ends, either victory or defeat is a cold war. maybe without shooting without guns without planes without missiles, but this is also war. she too. ends with either victory or defeat gorbachev led the country to defeat. it was not by chance that he capitulated in china, immediately appeared there, the first headline came out after the collapse of the soviet union, the suicide of the ussr, that is, the soviet union, having the ability to resist this

resistance . what kind of relations were there between the ministry of foreign affairs and the military under gorbachev, because they saw that the ministry of foreign affairs was losing these positions. he surrenders everything, as a result, the military suffers , the country's defense capability suffers, when we had an advantage in a whole class of weapons in medium and shorter range missiles, and we just like that for this class to be destroyed with us with an advantage and for the united states, which did not have such an advantage and maintaining in parallel with this, sea-based, which we did not have, but which allowed the americans to attack our territory, given the geography of russia, what is the great diplomatic here. this is a victory. are you giving away what's in what? you have moreover, gorbachev's advantage yes, he was received

in the west, yes, of course, margaret loved him very much , margaret thatcher, who called him hunchbacked , loved to tap on the shoulder. yes, here is ours, but an ordinary concept that every statesman understands, if you surrender your position just like that, then they will not talk to you that you have surrendered your position. and here we are back to you something good. what if you retreated, then we will talk with you about the position that gorbachev entered into, he should have understood this, because he was a statesman. i was at that time a young teacher in the ninety-fifth year. oh, eighty-five. excuse me, i began to work as a teacher at the military-political academy of the department of the international working communist movement of international relations. me. naturally, as mgushnika sent to the ninth faculty. this is a faculty for foreigners. i had bands on one side. these were hungarians and gdrovians, but on the other hand. these were representatives of nicaragu and other countries

third world. and now, how difficult it was to explain to them the position of the new political thinking, when the germans and hungarians looked and tried to get only one thing from me. what are you, here we are slowly handing over? or how and it was necessary to spin, because the statement of gorbachev that he made they went against all those installations that were previously united by the socialist camp, or we launch reforms there, they pass there. they know that they are undergoing reforms in their countries that clearly lead away from socialism. they are military people. they brought oath. what are they supposed to protect? this can be explained to civilians from the same yeltsin , he then headed the city committee of parties, yes, in the eighty- fifth year, well, we, as a military, as an organized public, were put in the water and put on the front rows, when

yeltsin spoke, say, he couldn’t at all. there boin came and explained the international situation. and yeltsin said, well, yes, like this, but gorbachev could not catch on with this man either. it 's just that i feel like i was so passionate about myself. slav well, or so i did not understand the country, and the fact that he did not understand the country. well, excuse me for one of the first decrees that dealt a blow, in general, to his charisma about alcohol about alcohol. yes, when a man came here, you know, how kind of saltykov yes , we were waiting for bloody deeds from him, he ate chizhik, he came and now he began to talk about how economic it was at first. here was the charismatic leader of yeltsin, he even outwardly copied all 30 secretaries. he also took everyone off. no, well, honestly, the alcohol of a person, a charismatic leader came. he did not understand that his

advisers did not understand what would happen next, a country with vast experience with centuries of experience in moonshine jam, would not find a way out. she found only more sugar, then the cigarettes disappeared, and that was it. this hit him with the power that when a rubber glove on a golden braga, hello gorbachev, or something like that, that is, they pulled on a rubber glove and when the braga was already inflated. it's this gold rubber glove. hello gorbachev, when the first word came, when he spoke, here we have thieves. yes, this is the people so to speak him, indeed. we have not heard this from the high stands. i was a member of the cpsu in 1979 . we never heard it. suddenly the leader comes who speaks and begins to tell the truth. naturally, you are drawn to it for another era of prehistoric material, suddenly after that, so

to speak, it begins to issue decrees. maybe this is good. well, when this is good, then it turns into an exhaustion of power, a fall in the authority of power, it becomes so much, well, from the outside it already seems that we have received another weak weak lida then, every time at every stage, he began to confirm this, who was in charge. excuse me . that's right. well, yes. let's get to kucherov in everything a bunch, with which everything is connected with what is connected for our people, putin will be drenched in the toilet and a fighter. right and so, when we saw a leader who speaks the truth, speaks sharply and who can fly on the fighter of the predecessors of our all leaders, starting with brezhnev, from whom i saw suddenly a man comes who can fly in a fighter, and not who barely speaks, well then, i didn’t know it yet, it

’s being implemented with you more carelessly already at a certain age. like you, i grew up with brezhnev. you can say hello. you say khrushchen they filmed fought and fought prowess than is available in the car. i drove like leonidovich did not see the hatred of the country by car. and when there was a conscious age, it is strong. yes i briefly i did not participate in the content of the discussion. uh, gorbachev as a politician? well, here comes the diktomia. a good man, and therefore, not for the first time in russian history. well it happens in life on smaller ones. i have been friends with gennady, eduard burbulis, mentioned here and who also passed away this summer, from the moment

of his resignation and until the families were friends. uh, until his last day. every year we met a lot, drank, spruce, and so on, a wonderful person, was a great friend, comrade, caring. everything for you was ready to do two topics that we never discussed yeltsin and the belavezha agreements, because you understood that we would immediately quarrel friendship would end. this is what i'm talking about. your good man friend. a very handy man well-read when he gets the power. and if some idea sits in his head, it often turns, remaining a good person for you, into a completely, completely different country. this must be understood, and in this case the same fork existed.

vgtrk war correspondent yevgeny pavlovny, zhen good evening, in direct contact with the studio. what is happening we are worried all the counter-offensives, especially now it is impossible to read what the ukrainian side writes, they forbade at least someone to take a step left step to the right no military correspondents, no civilians, so that they don’t write, and we still perceive freedom and military correspondents as chroniclers of the great era, then indeed the main topic now is a special military operation - these are certainly attempts to counter-offensive actions of the armed forces of ukraine as in the south section of the line of contact, and in the northern section. and the front. let's talk about everything in order, indeed, over the past three days, the formation of the kiev regime, they are trying go rather on the offensive in order to recapture the previously lost territories kherson. and the zaporozhye

regions, they are not doing very well. although there are certain local successes, but to take advantage of these local successes , the formation of the kiev regime. it is unlikely that they will be able to. i will explain why. the fact is that, despite the difficult situation of the armed forces of ukraine, with the help of the countries of the north atlantic alliance, well, what is called the entire nato world, and the formation of the kiev regime managed to transfer by force and funds to the south of the zone of the special military operation for the past month with the help of western high-precision missile systems, and the air forces have been attacking the logistics lines of the russian armed forces in the south. and also, and from the warehouses of battles and food, it was clear that this was preparation for a certain attackers. in general, perhaps this is the first such offensive in recent history, which was announced several months before. condists

of the kiev regime, so the factors of surprise, of course, did not work out. moreover, probably no one and didn't put it. uh, in kiev, such an understandable tactic was not invented in kiev after but attacks on e, logistics lines e, massive artillery preparation and infantry forward with the support of a tank. well, here is the terrain in the kherson region, for example, such that it is possible to advance along the steppe. extremely difficult without loss. and these losses appeared in the ministry of defense of the russian federation says that there are thousands of them, but the kiev regime is losing its personal composition, our estimates. well, much more modest, but at the same time, it’s clear that those battalion tactical groups that went ahead on e, kherson and in general, but in the m-th ukrainian segment. this is loudly called the battle for kherson, but, in fact, they lost their combat capability in two sections of the battle line, sopri. singing managed to

organize some local success for enemy units and formations. but, most likely, this success will end with large, and even huge losses, the armed forces of ukraine were involved in an attempt to organize the coverage of part of our grouping in the northeast. and hmm, this is the southern zone a and as a result, they actually ended up in the fire the bag is now under massive fire damage by artillery weapons of the armed forces of ukraine, but in fact, parts of the formation of the ukrainian army were under heavy fire, and what they will do in this sense is further unclear. well, they took lozovoe there, they took a few more settlements. for example, units of the russian army unit have not advanced further than holgin, and the volga, for example, has not been able to defend this line for three days . it is clear that he is advancing in the forehead of the armed forces of ukraine. the battle for

kherson although it is too early to let down. the results can turn into another defeat with grave consequences, with tragic consequences for the personnel. although the kiev regime does not stop this circumstance in any way, and there are enough examples since 2014, well, there is such a version that supposedly all the actions of the formation of the kiev regime in the south are such a diversionary maneuver that is very expensive, but to prepare an offensive in the kharkov region there, too, by the way, the formation of the kiev regime was able to concentrate certain forces, according to our data, up to two battalions of tactical groups with the support of tanks of units. but even there, the formation of regimes is already suffering losses as a result of the fire destruction of the russian army. tactics. it 's clear there too. this is the use of artillery as well.

hummers to strike at the rear, and after that, an attempt to attack with armored vehicles with infantry support on foot, but there are three circumstances that the ukrainian army is not allowed to act effectively here volodya is such a circumstance that western military advisers are, well, good theoreticians, but do not take into account the ukrainian reality. the fact is that the armed forces of ukraine lack neither tactical training nor the quality of combat control in order to implement the plans outlined by western curators, while absolutely variegated armored vehicles and wheeled and tracked vehicles mixed with soviet equipment, which ukraine got after the collapse of the soviet union western weapons systems are modern, which are naturally difficult to repair. and in general all this logistics is complex western -made artillery, which is difficult to maintain and deliver ammunition. nato is extremely difficult to the front line. all in all. circumstances make

counteroffensive attempts truly suicidal, and kiev still enjoys the fact that it managed to block the information space and data on losses for all the months that for these special military operations the dead are carefully hidden and recorded as missing. well, by doing so, they are trying to maintain some stability in a deeply heated ukrainian society. but, in fact, against the backdrop of these counter-offensives, the situation in the donbass has faded into the background. although fierce hostilities continue here, as before, in the bakhmut region, and in the donetsk region , our other groups are working there in the donetsk region. well , here it is. it is known that success is developing, which was ensured by the release of sand near donetsk and units and formations of the first corps of the donetsk people's republic, with the support of the allied artillery forces, in the first place. ah, go ahead

slowly hard, but they go forward, developing success in the direction of pervomaisky in marinka. the fighting continues. well, in general, these attempts at counter -offensive actions became possible. and i mean the attempts of counter-offensive actions of the enemy became possible, because the formation of the kiev regime with the support of western countries managed to restrain and reduce the pace of the offensive hmm russian forces and forces. uh, allied, i mean the corps of donetsk and luhansk here in the donbass because, and it’s clear that a kiev the regime did everything possible, covered itself with civilian mines, and the sands of residential quarters organize points in residential e areas where people are not evacuated only in order to slow down the pace of the offensive in the donbass in order to try to organize, well, pr bloody pr on a

counteroffensive in the south and perhaps on the territory of the kharkiv region, in general, the main thing is that it is clear and 3 days after the start of the offensive of the formations of the kiev regime, this is that the original plan of the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine well, we we mean that the intention of western advisers. it was thwarted. the armed forces failed to take advantage not of the surprise factor, but could not take advantage of it, but the fact that they concentrated reserves in order to fulfill at least the initial tasks of the counteroffensive were stopped, suffer huge losses and, in fact, are stuck. hmm, now in this sense a more advantageous position, just the armed forces of the russian federation and allied forces that operate in the southern direction. well, at least i can draw such conclusions. i am getting married. thank you very much brilliant deep scan. well, of course, it's exciting, but war

is the business of serious men, so that our men are very serious. you heard yevgeny like karas and proud correspondent of the military correspondent corps brilliant schools of the all-russian state television and radio broadcasting company mikhail borisovich develops the topic. uh, what's going on at the fronts? i spoke to our experts. they say that it's good that they kind of flooded, because they finally got up, finally went and now they are dragging them in and were very worried that they would not be able to drag them into fire bags. now they seem to be in them dive in and there really are those videos that appear. well, they are terribly dismantled. you know, i've been interrogated over the past few days by different people from different channels and by different people. well, i say, you understand, it’s very good that this happened, because in fact now these are the few and so lacking means of defeating armored vehicles from it. everything else. they themselves deliver

to recycling sites, so the more. the longer it will last, the better. but it's really amazing here, without going into fantasy. what are the goals persecuted by the kiev regime, because, and the factors of surprise do not need to talk about this offensive, they know and are preparing for it, indeed the second month is almost 2 months. uh, acute disadvantage. uh, they are in their means of the enemy, who admits that he is eight nine 10 times inferior to ours. it was repeatedly understood that during the attack on kherson in the steppes. this will remain the main factor in the remedy for his defeat. they use the means of his defeat. he is now a cowshed was bombed in the kursk region, in the colony. at makeevka hit. diesel, before that, in the 90th colony in kherson for the civilian sector of private development in nova kakhovka that is, it turns out they do n’t have enough of their funds, but they use them for other purposes, thank you. god bless them. thank you but now the trouble is happening that

is happening to such a hand from an incomprehensible place, growing specialists, having started hostilities, starting some kind of operation, they do not have the courage of political will or simply the brains to stop it, making sure during the first day that goals are not that has not been achieved. they cannot be reached, because advancing for a dry rate of 5-6 km , followed by a retreat almost to the starting positions , is, well, by no means a success. instead, new new reinforcements are not thrown. before leaving, i looked here, again, their information and foreign information was again thrown into sukhoi headquarters by two battalion groups of infantry and about 20 more tanks, because in the morning they lost everything from 12 tanks. in the same direction. everything is shot. so that's the point, the enemies are forced to say that the russians are still from 20 to 40.000 every day is easy to spend. i mean, this is not great. that is, it turns out that now in the air in the air. well, according to my estimates

, there are already 10% of the available armored vehicles. they were destroyed there in less than three days in 60 hours. aircraft, well, somewhere around 20-25 percent of those that are still able to take to the air, if a few more days have passed the disposal of those fighters who prepared nato members for them . some of the nato fighters are there, according to our ministry of defense. here god knows, probably, well, at least i look, they beautifully equipped. here they are, they have skills, at least actions in groups. he, too, is that they operate in the steppe, but here forgive me already, that this tone. then there is a separate mountain assault brigade. it's absolutely certain she 's being beaten right now. but this is the elite, which has been running around in the donbass for all eight years, that is, they are really hitting the best part and knocking out the equipment that well, look, now something like 200 armored vehicles have been destroyed. yes, poland

delivered the only 232 tanks of all countries. and this the heaviest weapons that were delivered by all the rest combined, that is, almost all deliveries from. probably, i am sure that tomorrow this figure will be surpassed. that is, here is the volume of the work that they themselves brought to us on a silver platter, and you will lose it. they really need to be picked up. the pace of systems on the shoulders to pick up hope will let down the personnel enough to allow the enemy to go forward on the shoulders. i looked there all sorts of odessa sites and so on, well, there's just trouble, that is, they say we won't expect watermelons from kherson but the ambulance , one by one, one at the same time, the ambulance donating blood is everywhere, because the loss is really colossal, but he said that there were 100 people. yes, they lost everything. there is generally something darker there, that is, for now. and

the main thing is that the westerners, given that they have not started in such cases, they sometimes have mad tantrums in support. it means that something is not going according to plan. well , i looked at the maps published by western sources. they are very careful. and besides here little progress. in the sense they do n’t talk about anything, this kind of advance looks like a drag in the fire bear, which, well, in these directions there are up to ten directions on the entire front. here they tried to advance, they had local successes, they are called settlements, but all this surprised that there were sound voices, because she lena berberg said that she didn’t care how the german voters were treated and, most importantly, that she promised the ukrainians and she was in front of them , that is, it became clear that linberg was preparing for to the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine if he cares about ukraine's interests much more than germany . but, i don't know, we have it in german. well, high-ranking representatives. i ’ll say it again now, they’ll offend me, i’ll say this to the german armed forces and who said that,

in general, you need to understand who we are dealing with and so that you don’t think the russian armies are very powerful and may well work on two fronts. if necessary, well, it’s clear that they understand something, that they misunderstood something not about our army, and they greatly overrated. but although that they before valued. here is tucker carlson asking questions. i think it 's brilliant. and here is what the inspector general of the bundeswehr, general eberhan, said, a large number of different ones, maybe tied to ukraine at the moment. but even so, we should not underestimate the potential of the russian ground forces to open the second theater of operations. he also added that most of the russian fleet was involved not in ukraine, and the air force has significant potential, which poses a threat even for us, in addition, speaking of the shortcomings of the russian army, he mentioned a huge one. stockpiles of weapons to take into account consider the german general russia is quite capable of expanding the conflict. and so

kirk carlson asks a red question. well, where and what do we supply? according to the statement, the incident stocks of weapons. where did they go? they were sent to a corrupt ukrainian oligarch. i came up with a simple example of the number of stocks left now at the start of 5 mm, which are used by an inconveniently low one of the representatives of the pentagon for this year only model ukrainian government more than 800,000 such shells. where did they go. we have no idea , 'cause we don't track it. naturally. most of the structures were sold to stabilize other countries. but this finally hit the bottom in this whole story. so this is a statement by pentagon officials that this is not the level at which american troops will be ready to fight a man in the pentagon. he that, this threat was the readiness of our country.

is it by chance? so vladimir vladimirovich well, yes, they of course, i watch the western media write, of course, about this kherson counteroffensive, but really very cautious ones are already wondering. and what will happen if kherson is not returned? will this count as a win? putin is naive. they think we'll just iron them and stop there. er , regarding. well, here the military analysis is doing to return home to odessa. i hope she promised us to eventually cover that clearing, so we're all waiting for this moment. here, as for the analysis here, uh, dan is such that there is nothing special to add here in a military situation? yes, i want to firstly remind you that today is the day of mourning in the donbass today for 4 years. yes, uh, the anniversary of the villainous murder of the terrorist act in the center of donetsk

when alexander zakharchenko died the leader of the dpr, uh , again, of course, even in this situation , the inhabitants of donbass and the already liberated territories of ukraine honor the memory of the deceased hero. er, i mean, they thought they killed him, they immortalized his name forever. this name will be in the history books. donbass will always be russia and russia i hope yes, but the name of the killers, uh, will be cursed forever. and in general, they will wipe their feet on them, and everyone in a row, including their allies, and in this regard, by the way, there is also a contrast about how we are preparing for the first of september. we remember, yes, poroshenko's plan to order their children to sit in basements. our children will go to schools. now, even in mariupol, they have already restored what yevgeny told the ballet this morning, yes, he says, we thought we would hold a line on the first of september. we will not give this word. what do you think, with our

correspondents spend on the liberated territory near khimir, where they will really tell about the world to these kids, the first first -graders, and so on, the first calls will be made, i will look at plans for september 1 in ukrainian schools. well , it's mostly online, but nevertheless, it means that the plans announced will take into account, uh, children, the term rashism. and, that is, you understand, we are the lessons of the world, they are going to spend five minutes of hatred. and who will conduct? well, but no, zelensky's wife will be. yes, easily lord, i want the way he is subtle connoisseur. and to show this short video so that they don’t ask about us, then he came. well, yes. here, look what eva braun says. we can return to our dreams, firstly, nothing has been canceled. therefore, there is such a wonderful expression that i love no one will stop the idea of ​​time, which time is right. go, you've come a long time ago. whose idea do you think it is? vladimirovich is

great. you know, this was said by an ideologue of ukrainian nazism, an accomplice of hitler, whose name is inscribed in bloody letters in the history of polish jewish russian ukrainian people war criminal stepan bander, and now this woman is quoting bandera. yes. this favorite phrase, so that there is no doubt, what kind of family rules in ukraine is not in this regard. they already, in my opinion, do not even hide anything, when everyone is already quoting bandera. and uh in the background. bandera is produced there, some speeches and so on. so, there are no more illusions in this regard. even those who hoped that zelensky and not bandera would never join this.

and the last yes about i understand that time that's not a lot. yes, that's why the morning is still very far away in this regard. yes, now the plan to close the bulgakov museum has been announced again, in kiev or

ukraine, yes. yes, and, how the museum did not try , the museum staff from the fourteenth year posted a poster, i remember who supports it. uh, donetsk separatists are forbidden here for entry, they supported the ukrainian one, and they already tried so hard, but everything bulgakov should be banned, well, the ukrainian nazis are hated by nationalists. bulgakov once i remember there alone. yes, one specialist, there ukrainian nationalist wrote an article. eh, about me , about my book, or is there a history of the donetsk republic , there was such a headline, and kornilov is bulgakov today. it offended me greatly to offend. vladimir vladimirovich do you understand? and now it doesn't matter how they did not curry favor with these employees. in fact, the museum is unique, a wonderful museum, one of the most popular museums in kiev was tourists. and not only russian ones. he is bulgakov, who is popular both in poland and in europe,

pouring blood into a psychic about what, well zelenskaya difficult financial situation. he rents out his villa in italy. well, yes, russians, but, but they took this one to write, of course, crushed diesel fortes with damas. russia mothers, maybe it's of course, kopeysk maybe it's a good russian said that good russians can not be rented out so they saw in che who they want instead of the bulgakov museum. there are unique. in fact, wonderful exhibits want to make a museum of the great ukrainian composer. koshiti very much so i tried, of course, to understand what he was for sure. maybe we

can't play a couple of melodies, so that's the point. i'm thinking, in fact , in kiev there is a small museum of this very god, no one goes there. and they want to close the most popular one now. maybe we'll find some music to eat anyway. hardly understand. and why ? because he lived there for a year and two in this house. well, you know, remember the house of turbines, it's a few apartments. the profitable house was, respectively, so he lived there bulgakov lived there with his family for 13 years, yes, and he really described it in his works this house. well, that's all for the sake of fighting everything russian, of course, they will go for it by itself. thank you, and vladimirovich raised the topic. yes, that is, compare 4 years, firstly, as one day, and that there is no alexander zakharchenko, yes, that is, this is a coincidence, when almost

on the same day, yes, that is, he dies, the heroic alexander zakharchenko dies dies having lived in full , that president is the only president of the soviet union who led the country to that state, because of which zakharchenko actually died and many in donbass perished because of this, because the last romantic, but a wonderful person is the soul of the soul of the company. yes, for some reason, he turned out to be the person who managed to squander, the state in which we were born, which is a huge legacy that he inherited, and you know, when in the ninety-sixth year. he again decided to go to the post of president , yes, that is, in my opinion, there was a figure of 0.5%, but even then they explained to him who he was and how valuable his contribution to the history of our state was. and really need to forgive to leave with god, as it were, yes, that is, but the conclusions, because he is a good person, but he made concessions. to all our adversaries. it is not these things that are unacceptable, and now our children need

to understand and know that this is an illusion that was being formed at that moment; it is unacceptable now, that is, we are now soberly looking at all these things that america was not going to ever love americans by americans. we never intended to be friends. they always collect. they entered our territory on ours no our people on ours intelligence. yes, that is, well, they were never going to be on equal terms with us, and the main thing is that gorbachev allowed him even entering into some kind of friendly relations. he surrendered interest from his state , surrendered interests in germany, surrendered the interests of eastern europe, surrendered the interests of the agreement to the west. we get to reap its fruits today, but that's not the point now. yes, that is, this is this performance, which i simply could not miss. and we mentioned here evgeny smartly told everything, gave away the whole situation. on the battlefield, and americans are americans, when they look at this whole thing, they they they what are they talking about? this is probing. it's just probing. that is, the americans have a headset. they are waiting. they say, now

they will probe it later. how they will give it, how they will break through. yes, how they will rush, yes, and there are 2 months before the elections, so it 's time, that is, faster faster come on, come on, come on, yes, that is, any kind of victims? what thousands? what's the difference? yes put these ukrainians. no matter how many thousands, it doesn’t matter, that is, if only our ministry of defense says about 1.700, and in these positions, wait, but they pulled marinka away from avdiivka. yes? and how many losses are there today? how many losses today? well, this is on and on along our line is close to the line, i mean. e, seversk a. artyom, there are so many losses on this one today, so now ukraine pays, in full and pays in real blood, so the ukrainian people see it. unfortunately, i don't think so far. well, then you have to count and you have to, but squeal with bloody tears today. ukraine is the state who is ready to do anything, she is ready to sacrifice her people, she is ready, and to mock our people, so i have said many times in this studio that this is gentlemanship. in my

opinion, it is completely inappropriate now. uh, zelensky is frank in his appeals. he says, and we will strike at lugansk, we will strike at simferopol, we will strike at sevastopol, near donetsk, we will do all this. that is, and there to the russian allied troops, the inhabitants of these territories with a horse-drawn resident. there will be no place, because we we will do whatever we want. we will use sabotage, we will use terrorism. we will use all methods, so in my opinion. and when, again, all sorts of johnsons wander around kiev with them. this is wrong when communication centers in ukraine continue to work and for some reason we bypass them. this is also wrong. but we can say these symbolic things as much as we like, that this does not affect anyone, but this is wrong if the logic of the war when from the decision-making center, which is here we are here is saved. immunity, and here is the killing of people's children, when donetsk is stripped far and wide, when every day there, and oh, people die, dozens of people get injured, kiev for some reason is under

some kind of aura, because that i don’t call for killing people, but zelensky and kuleba reznikov yes, they are direct participants in the war, they are direct culprits, they are frank targets for all these things, so this cannot be allowed, that is, civilians are civil and this is not civil they are direct participants in all events. and you know what happens today. right now, data on the energy gift for today arrived 23 arrivals in the area of ​​​​the station 23 arrivals, maybe the figure will be checked and corrected in some direction mtt megat is going there. today , the dilemma must be left as to who they are, a political organization, or they are independent experts on peaceful nuclear issues. yes, that is, they will now have to choose. that's when they arrive, that is, they will see ukrainian shelling. they will see that ukraine today. frankly, they are trying to use the peaceful atom as a dirty bomb. they will see it. they will be able to say this to the whole world, and then a question will arise, that is, there will be a dilemma. does russia, china, india need another

state there, which can look freely and openly at what is happening in reality, to be in the organization that today someone is manipulating, who is starting to play, but in the interests of others who come to kiev gets tsu and is now going in that direction in that side in order to come and what and what will be the statement of what kind will be the assessment. i really hope that someone in this organization will have an attempt to maintain their status. at least there rhinomas are not biased, but i'm afraid that here the percentages will not be quite equal or the organization, which as they say. yes, i am writing for peaceful people there for peaceful use there, and ukraine has already shot a video today. this is generally, of course, the spanish slot when if not if but, when they no longer have the question of whether the worst is coming. yes, that's how they will take people out. well, that is, in principle, they took all the old chronicles that were filmed at the chernobyl nuclear power plant, when people were taken out. here they tried. it's called the buzzword cosplay.

well, it would be better not to start, because, firstly , it became clear that they were absolutely not ready. if god forbid, this will happen, that is, it is obvious that they will violate everything. this is if at all something will be carried out, but they generally expect them to be promised this rides potassium. yes, here a magic pill that should, in theory, save everyone. but if you go in, just not even being an expert here to read. yes, here is a description of the action of this medicine, it does not save. it does not save at all, but acts only on the thyroid gland. and everything else, but no, people will die. and of course, in this situation. so that 's how the mission is. now everyone is worried that, it turns out most of all, that the missions of the rich did not allocate some kind of special pass, and she must pass here is a security pass, but the general grounds kata that's how all people are. yes pass all the circles of hell that ordinary people go through, who once every day go through this control. that's the only thing that worries everyone and is still not clear, really. will they get there, because

ukraine may not reach the power plant itself. yes, ukraine can arrange anything. can they tell? no, sorry, you know that my life is more precious to me. i'd rather go back home. i'll sign for you, i'll write everything you want, only yes take us back, please, so i'm amazed, of course, this one here's all the carelessness. why because, if someone is still in europe, yes, that ukraine will shoot at the moment when the wind blows on crimea or russia, that is, yes, the wind can change at any moment guys. they also decided fans. everything there is a whole movement. yes, we’ll buy these fans and they go back to russia, but at the same time, it ’s good, besides me, there’s zaporizhzhya at the power station in ukraine, which is much closer to europe and it’s not like a fan there anymore. yes, there the wing will no longer help. bye then even about it. no one thinks, and the fact that there will be nuclear nuclear blackmail has been talked about a very long time since the fourteenth year and you know in this situation, of course. the only thing i want to say is thank you. yes, this is for the budapest

memorandum, because if god forbid they still have nuclear weapons - that's me. i don't even know what it is now. well, except that in the nineties the crocodile was one of the leaders. on the gray market for weapons. you know, that's his name coming back. i think it's still the main theme of the day today, in spite of everything, of course, i am very disappointed that today the entire information space was not crammed with krylov. mikhail sergeevich gorbachev. i believe that this is absolutely unfair, because today is the memorial day of alexander yes zakharchenko, so you are such an attention to a person who should be evaluated. first of all, not western leaders, yes, who today are pushing each other with their elbows. yes, there are all sorts of used beer, they competed in eloquence. yes, and have a drink. namely, we are the ones who survived, it's all all these consequences. yes , because we lost a huge number of people as a result. this is the collapse of the soviet union. yes , no one remembered today, except for us. what, what happened after that, it was, transnistria, abkhazia, chechnya, ossetia, tajikistan, and karabakh, and that

's what we have, what and what we have now, these are also the consequences of this and now i'll close the circle . i really hope that the circle is closed and you know what. i hope next year. yes , this is the day, that is, someone somewhere. maybe be, remember there that's back, when he died, you last night right? it's just that there are people who remain a wikipedia line. and there are people who remain. we are always in the memory and hearts of people. well, i will try to summarize what the ukrainian viewers heard today about the events that developed, er, in the direction of kherson. so this is an attack. first of all, it was successful, which means that ukraine is liberating. uh, one settlement after another, the enemy of panic flees there are no losses from the ukrainian side, and the battles are being fought on the outskirts, kherson, you know how i want to tell you. today i

tried on different television channels, at least, well, maybe, i think, well, i would be nice, i know ukraine, usually someone is at least, well, at least half a word, the truth will say somewhere, you know what struck me on all television platforms poroshenko is beginning to end with everyone else rhetoric is the same straight word, and this led me to one thought that we are not fully, in general, assessing the level of influence of western intelligence services on the ukrainian information space, when we accused zelensky that he wants to usurp power and has built this information vertical. we were wrong. this is not a zelensky shot. it seems to me that it was precisely the western curators who built this information vertical in order to push through this commentary everything that they need and what they need to feed the ukrainian people. that's exactly how it happens. that is, well, today somewhere even on alternative squares. you know, today i tried to find it on facebook and

i think, well, i know a number of politicians who, one way or another, otherwise, well, they don't like zelensky well, they don't like him, by definition they never love him. but even in this situation, they didn’t try to tell me a word a word of the truth, what actually happened there now by uh, the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant does not bother you with the fact that the russian federation took control of, uh, the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant in early march and there were no problems. well, there was no shelling of anything. we were talking about shelling at the zaporozhye nuclear power plant just a month ago, which means it’s for someone need. i wouldn't focus on the iaea conclusions there, that's all, of course. this is completely clear to me. i already gave an example. if emnosti international published a report, they were thrashed there and they had to make excuses, if the pope of rome e would say condolences on the death of dasha dugin, they kicked him like a slop bucket, then i don’t expect anything from the rich. this

is absolutely obvious to me, but it seems to me that it is not by chance that this is happening around the nuclear power plant. i think this is the beginning of a big attack on the russian rosatom this is the beginning of a big attack on russian hair. i think there will be an attempt. due to the fact that the world leader still likes it, is it for someone or not? there will be an attempt by the americans, primarily their westone house company, which has repeatedly tried to replace e with its own, so to speak, with its own fuel. politics. it seems incredible today. yes, but by some mechanisms, try to squeeze russia out of this huge market, where it is actually the leader. this is not just how it all started. not because someone wanted something there, so to speak, e wanted

or from a military point of view. this also does not represent. it must be converted into something concrete. it seems to me that they took exactly this direction, well, let's see how events will develop and well, let's finish the logic of, uh, informational informational first of all the events in ukraine ended uh, the next one after when zelensky said that any goal is sevastopol or either in other cities? this is our legitimate target and we will attack. uh, representatives of the office of the president mykhailo podolyak, but said that the ukrainians will be next, and forced to mandatory evacuation, wait for mandatory evacuation, these will be people in crimea, that is, people in crimea should prepare for the fact that ukrainians hmm i don’t know there railroad bus ukrainian authorities will organize. and, but really, this is the movement, and how to

oblige the crimeans to leave, crimea why? because the next one was given an opening, because the next operations? crimea will be natural, we will lead you, and then we will rest, so look, we haven’t taken it yet. these. i'm not just talking, but what kind of arrest officers or others like him? i'm talking about the president of ukraine and i'm talking about a representative of the president's office. this is personal life. this is a public statement by the ukrainian authorities to crimea to prepare for a mandatory evacuation in order to chatting stopped there and i want to finish with bad information, because, well, this is not information. this is a fact my friend is coming. tomorrow she went to school in kiev for her child in one building. so there to see what, yes, just like she sent me a photo, photo, uh, there on

my telegram channel, if possible, publish it. where does the ad say what? about that, warning the children to let them, let's say, here's a doorknob and a grenade is tied to the door and ukrainian. uh, call dear parents. prepare your kids for what the grenades are can be in uh, unexpected places and this ad. well, it's not an ad, it's like that. i even it is rather not not advertising. this is an information campaign to all the schools in kiev, she told me to be located. and yes, you see a grenade. it may not be enough, of course. and so i want to say that here are children, children in school and they will be, uh, and parents. parents of children should teach not only that,

this publication happened for the money of enis. there is naturally an emergency in the ministry of education. why do i say that this position is not only the ukrainian authorities, this position and unicef. children, kyiv. children. tomorrow they will go to schools, they will be taught. uh, what, but about safety. and how will parents tell their children who is putting these grenades? here, now look, there was one vladimir vladimirovich. now the kiev children are slowly starting to live just like the rest of them in this place. it's me, i don't want to say how many, unfortunately, children were blown up on the petals. i don't know, but how many yes, no, now you need to understand when these are, so that you don't speak out there. and here now ukrainian bastards covered the city with

petals. and who undermines them, quietly. i want to say yesterday. well, that is the 31st. now you are already the first in gorlovka today our correspondent told. he spoke, he had tears on the air . and your shells were thrown. the girl 's small hand was torn off a few centimeters left and there is no high temperature and it turned out to be bad at all, that still fragments of the stomach hit, but they did the operation. and so my mother tells and it is clear that she did not fully understand. here, just here when zelensky next turns to the people of ukraine, he just needs to understand why this bastard will be judged. and why will there be a tribunal and all these chatterboxes will be there? here

for these children for these babies. they have been killing them for 8 years and now they continue. oh, vasilyevich, zakharchenko said. may you kill us. we dead will come to you and will kill you, he said, he is a ukrainian nazi. we are not afraid of death. we are not afraid, tornado. she’s just already switching to children, what is it like to kill children for 8 years, not you, personally in no way case. you were against from the very beginning the ukrainian government 8 years of children being killed by the nazis. the bastards don't give a damn about this and his wife bandera quotes. therefore, i do not need to tell about the jewish zelensky non-jew. he's on the bandwagon, see you tomorrow.

it's always interesting how it all starts. now you will see everything manufacturers of good things want and most importantly. but it's best to check.

along the black-and-white grass road, mariupol amputated words over the skeletons of dolphins and cows , smoke, burnt unspoken words. let freedom all the bells will ring, mariupol the city of masha without a hand, death is killed, a new path is marked for us, mary now cannot be deceived. what is culture? this chorus is one grandmother singing another. i, too, a grandmother, i took it and sang, how can i katyusha where the slopes are. and now we drove the enemies away, finally katyusha came ashore to look at the seversky donets

we look to learn about the world of educational

programs and watch documentaries for free without registration.

1 and the only president of the soviet union mikhail gorbachev will be buried on september 3 forgiveness will take place in the hall of columns of the house of unions, and there is no dispute

about his role in the history of zenait kurbatov , not a single person in russia who forced perestroika at a conscious age who would remain indifferent to the departure of mikhail gorbachev about the first and last president of a huge country. they say that a tragic figure is a man who gave freedom to our people and at the same time he is fiercely criticized, in particular, for the fact that mikhail sergeevich was making concessions to the west.