in ukraine, they decided to find out how humanitarian aid ends up on store shelves, the theft seems to have reached such proportions that the national anti-corruption bureau could not turn a blind eye to it. anastasia ivanova will tell how the investigation is progressing help that people never saw, at least in the usual sense, the freelance agent of the anti-gravity bureau of ukraine writes everything that was collected in kiev and for outside the square turned out to be on the shelves of chain stores, that is, medicines, food and hygiene products, which, in theory, should be free for residents, zaporizhzhya simply sold. the situation in some ways for the ukrainian thieves is even better than usual, because now everything is

written off war for war. everything in the gray zone is incomprehensible . the rest to consider - it is absolutely impossible. incidentally, i think that e is. uh, those interested are abroad, and ukraine in these cases, maybe some deliveries do not even reach the borders, according to the same anti-corruption committee, the entire top of the administration is suspected of stealing, zaporozhye under the control regime of zelensky is, first of all, the governor alexander starukh, his deputy zlata nekrasova, this couple was already engaged in the distribution of 1,000 tons of unitary cargo from poland, after which polish goods appeared in zaporozhye stores. now no patriotic can now be photo officials the local residents help, they demand serious punishment for them. the scheme is absolutely clear to everyone, it’s

just that from the beginning to the end its meaning, and the big head of the rp moves his people to bread positions in these positions. people begin to work realizing that under the word work, of course , corruption. after that, you bring the suitcases to your master, your patron. and i hope it is a new increase, that is, the absolute scheme known to everyone, which has already been working throughout the history of ukraine, continues to work, as we see under any authority. the so-called patron is none other than andriy yermak, it was the head of zelensky’s office who made the old woman the head of the administration of the zaporozhye region in a corruption scheme, as reportedly, the local deputy viktor shcherbina was also involved, and against this background, what a mockery looks like the pictures on his page with the distribution of some packages to local to residents, the secretary of the zaporozhye ukrainian city council anatoly courses, who was also recorded in the ranks of corrupt officials, posted a refutation. well, we are not to blame. it's all bluff and intrigues of political

opponents of strength, type of deputies, all deputies, who from the very morning, almost in their pajamas, ran around the city council with a telephone and sniffed out something in the corners, trying to find some compromising findings in the hut. you can write distorted information in your social networks and resources controlled by you and your friends as much as you like. well , now there is a live broadcast from mgimo where russian foreign minister sergey lavrov address students to the knowledge of the day, which really has already become just a routine start of the school year, and in the afternoon, when important events are held, when schoolchildren come after the holidays, students meet each other, share their impressions with stories. well, in principle, they talk about what is happening in the country. uh, after the holidays, such

conversations always. very interesting. i remember it very well when i was returning from construction teams, when anton vasilyevich and i studied at the university and vividly discussed the events that took place while you were somewhere there, which means that you mastered the siberian distances with a pick or rested, and in some some college camp and today of course, the event that everyone is discussing when returning from vacations is connected with what is happening around ukraine. and to be honest, with the hybrid war that the collective west unleashed without shyness. openly rudely aggressively against our country, when i realized that his plans to turn ukraine into anti-russian organization

on ukrainian territory. darma for the military deterrence of the russian federation failed, and when he realized that our patience is not endless and that for many years, starting with the munich speech president putin in 2007, we warned them of the acceptability of actions to advance nato to the east in complete disregard for the assurances of promises that were made by the leadership of the soviet union and the consequences of the russian federation, and in complete disregard for the legitimate interests of our security about the refusal of the west to fulfill its obligation not to strengthen the security of nato countries at the expense of security of the russian federation when we warned against pandering to neo-nazism in ukraine for many years, when we called for letting

infringement of the russian language instead of stopping these illegal, contrary to all conventions tendencies. the west silently indulged the fact that, as a result, the russian language is now legally prohibited in ukraine in the field of education , mass media, and culture, and when our warnings about inadmissibility. in fact, agreement with the coup d'etat in the fourteenth year they are the permissibility of supporting the regime, which, having proclaimed russophobic slogans , began to bomb the russian population on its own territory. and when it finally succeeded to reach the minsk agreements in february of the fifteenth year. and uh, these agreements opened the way to reaching an agreement and closing the problem. and here is the problem, about which i

mentioned, but not poroshenko nor zelensky they are about it. now they say they were not going to fulfill any agreements, despite their approval. if it's safety he's a west. in general, well , either he was silent, or somewhere silently rejoiced that this is how we annoy the russian federation well to create such a thing right on its borders anti-russian. the state, when they finally realized that all these years our conversations were not empty persuasions and requests, but reflected the fundamental interests of our state. right now, you see, they are hysterical and are trying with their unprecedented aggression and unprecedented malice to compensate for their own inability. but

to be honest, their own unwillingness to conduct business on this planet on the basis of equality of mutual respect and on the basis of compliance with the principles of international law, first of all became. it is where the principle of sovereign equality of the state is enshrined. that is why what is happening now is not at all about the interests of the ukrainian people. this is about preventing, as they consider , the preservation of russia as an independent force in the international arena, but the history of our state has also known more serious stages, when our role our place in the international arena was called from our other partners, so to speak, how ironic we are call the desire to weaken russia, i am convinced that this will not work, as it is not

no one has succeeded in the past, but the conclusions that we are now drawing, they relate specifically to international architecture, as ours sees it. uh, the western neighborhood, which, in general, is openly heading for the rejection of international law and the imposition of its own rules. they say so, the world order must be established. according to our rules , they announced isolation in russia as one of such rules ; sanctions do more harm to themselves. and their author, uh, inflation, rising prices, especially for energy.

ah, it is the middle class population that suffers, first of all, eh. but uh, this is russophobic. uh obsession, it manifests itself and even in such conditions literally. today i read what mrs. anna lena berberg of the german foreign minister said yesterday. yes, our citizens are suffering, but they will have to suffer. not because we will support ukraine no matter what fantastic recognition. just a fantastic confession, just like that in the vein, as they say the talk that is going on about the need to hold early elections in a number of european countries, but in general, of course, the western liter is guided by the logic of yesterday and yesterday. ah, odnopal from almost said

same-sex unipolar world, but promote e contrary to the objective trends e of historical development, which dictates. as a matter of fact, the recognition of the real emergence of the strengthening of new centers, and the economic development and financial power and political influence of the centers that have self-esteem, who want to defend their legitimate interest. to respect the traditions of their centuries-old civilizations, many millennials do not want to be sheared under the same brush of liberal values. and you know, when the european union is now thinking about how it should be and whether individual countries have the right to develop, as they consider it necessary, taking into account their history in their

traditions, and when they come from the center of brussels and from those capitals that want to unify everything and everyone declare. no guys. you have no such right to be must, otherwise we will punish you. and the vice-chancellor minister of economy of germany, mr. habib , recently said that it is necessary to do away with national interests in europe. this is also very significant. and the countries that are located on, uh, the eurasian continent of latin america in africa , they see all this and this prospect does not suit them at all. they begin to understand very well what kind of rule the west is trying to impose. all of us, all of us, and they want to return to the roots to that very sovereign equality. states on which the un charter is based and which

implies respect for the civilizational diversity of the modern world is based on confessional diversity. and so we are by no means alone. we are not isolated. rather, they are trying to isolate us. but these attempts are doomed to failure, and 80% of the states have not joined the western sanctions, despite absolutely. shameless pressure blackmail threats including uh, personal threats uh, personally to certain politicians and we continue to actively cooperate within the framework of the united nations where, by the way, a group of friends was created in defense of the un charter, and its ranks are already multiplying two dozen members. and, of course, we are working in the post-soviet space within the framework of the csto of the

eurasian economic union and the cis, of course, the shanghai cooperation organization is a very promising new poverty, and in the eurasian context, but it is on a global level. this is the brix , which, like the sco, is attracting more and more strange people who are asking for the status of an observer partner, and more and more are applying for a full-fledged a member of this unity for them the future, just as the future for e, work in this and other frameworks to overcome those discriminatory ones. the approaches that the west demonstrate in the context of the financial and economic architecture are more and more states. uh, they understand that they are practically taking measures to reduce dependence on the international monetary financial system, how they

built it and how they control it. west, more and more states are in practice reducing their dependence on the dollar from western technologies, western-controlled logistics chains and creating, in general, their own, but mechanisms that will not be subject to any kind of dictatorship or any kind of abuse. so this is a group of countries that wants democracy to be more than an empty phrase. and not as a tool that the west uses as a slogan to interfere in the internal affairs of sovereign countries, imposing on them the western vision of how this or that country needs to organize its life, but more and more the country wants to see democracy in the international arena, where everyone is equal, where everyone respects each other. the west so categorically refuses to discuss

democratizing international relations instead by promoting their concept of a rule-based order on western rules. here are the goals of our foreign policy in this situation remain unchanged - to ensure our national security, in a reliable way. this is the creation of the most favorable conditions for our development of socio-economic development to improve the well-being of our citizens. this is, what is especially important in the current conditions is the strengthening of sovereignty from our country. and this of course, the need to defend our fundamental interests in the international arena, to defend the honor and dignity of our citizens, our compatriots who live in other countries, and, of course, there are many discussions about patriotism now. and what is

it? and how should this patriotism manifest itself in modern conditions. i think that patriotism is in any era. uh means by and large the ability of a person. uh, know your country, love your country and live by the interests of your country, and i am convinced that the deeper students are students. well students. in this case, in the process of teaching our history about the topic, they will be interested in the events that determined the plowed events in our development, which determined the future path of russia in all its guises. the more we will see that patriotism, which is not leavened, not artificial, which simply naturally comes to a person in the process of learning

the history of his own country. and by the way, i know that in my opinion, there are foreign students. yes , they did, i want to greet you too. want to emphasize that some countries are trying to isolate us, or isolation will not happen to force us to isolate ourselves. i just explained. for what reasons, and most to isolate. we're not going to either. we west will close will spend. e nights, not discussing who to give a schengen visa. how many times at the entrance to the schengen zone do you ask a person for whom he is there for the reds or for the whites whose crimea is there they want to ask three times already so that the person is certainly not mistaken, but this is ridiculous, you understand, these are people

pitiful. in general, by and large, but we will not isolate ourselves with me. i, for example, here we have not discussed this yet, but i think that in response. we don't need to close ourselves to these schengen walls, which they are now trying to build there. we do not need to reciprocate and punish collectively to punish citizens of european countries. we have favorite characters that are already marked e on ours in our sanctions lists and i don't see them. when they say, suddenly someone said, i don’t remember here in europe, then we, in my opinion, are a minister luxembourg what if we can't punish 140 million people. but he said this when the mainstream in europe was precisely aimed at punishing those same ones. well, we are a little more than all the citizens of the russian federation, we, i think, should not

go, so there are already ways to answer, but stupidity for stupidity, but of course, no one canceled reciprocity. purposefully used against the organizers and executors of such anti-russian sanctions, and foreign students. i think mgimo is also in other universities. there are a lot of them too. this a great opportunity for them to get to know the russian federation and in our citizens it is necessary to learn their country's history, it is limitless, you can always find something new, but for foreigners. this i think the more interesting the more. you learn about us er, the stronger. i think there will be prospects for the development of the world along the right path, and along the path of seeking agreement, finding a

balance of interests, and not along the path of building sovereignty under the command. the rest we are for equality we are for friendship by and large in the very its wide application, and we want, uh, you to know better about us, learn about our life. this will contribute to the development of relations between our countries. i am convinced that these words of mine will be interpreted by many. e in europe as a desire to recruit someone, but i am sure that all normal people about such a majority perfectly understand what we are talking about. once again, i congratulate you on the holiday and i am ready to answer questions. please, to the right, we are sergey viktorovich

thank you very much for your speech alexander kuznetsov the first year student of the faculty of international relations would like to ask a question about the situation around the zaporizhzhya npp in the context of constant provocations from the apu, which is shelling zaporozhye. nuclear power plants are thereby bringing the world to the brink of a man-made disaster, russian diplomats are fighting disinformation from the west, which accuses our country of shelling, the iaea will visit the territory of the nuclear power plant the other day, apu does not stop shelling the station, and this morning they tried to land troops in energodar, my question is what russia expects from the visit of magathen to the zaporozhye npp and can we hope for the objectivity of the commission? we expect precisely objectivity, although all the rest who are somehow connected with this visit are connected.