sergey viktorovich thank you very much for your speech alexander kuznetsov, a first-year student at the faculty of international relations, would like to ask a question about the situation around the zaporozhye nuclear power plant in the face of constant provocations from the armed forces, which are shelling zaporozhye. nuclear power plants are thus bringing the world to the brink of a man-made disaster, russian diplomats are fighting disinformation, from the west, which accuses our country of shelling, the iaea will visit the territory of the nuclear power plant the other day, apu does not stop shelling the station, and this morning they tried to land troops in energodar, my question is what russia expects from the visit of magathen to the zaporozhye nuclear power plant and can we hope for the objectivity of the commission? we expect objectivity, although all the others who are somehow connected with this visit were connected with its preparation. uh,

trying to make it difficult. they clearly don't want the missions to be rich. and i made objective conclusions, i remind you. when the russian armed forces occupied this territory, the iaea turned to us with a request, the request was absolutely natural in magats have obligations under the relevant international instruments. periodically check the state of safety of nuclear power plants, one of which is zaporozhye and magadai, she said, well, they are professionals, they do not politicize their work, since now the russian armed forces are in control of the rest. they said, we are the leaders of the multitude. we would like to somehow agree with you in order to carry out the next regular necessary inspection. eh, as it should be. we

agreed on everything that is necessary. that was done during may 3 june. everything was ready. and we told them to choose a date, please come back in a day. we were told that the secret is a number of the un in the face of its security department. banned you from this trip. well, other words were found there, but the trip could not take place due to the position of the secretary. un ah. well, we generally said, let's you negotiate there yourself. uh, we did everything that was required of us, then there was some kind of pause, then the ukrainians started actively. in july, the territory of the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plants, and then we already began to demand that the mission arrive sooner, so that the secretary who banned it at the beginning of june would nevertheless

realize his responsibility. and then this discussion began, then at some stage of the un secretary by the way, i remind you that in those very weeks, mr. zelensky, denying that ukraine was shelling the station, said that if the mission was agreed, then there would be no obstacles. and for its safe conduct, i consider this a confession by and large, if he guaranteed that everything would be safe there, but subsequently events developed. so to the secretary's question - this is him, when these conversations were going on where messi could call on the secretary's question, then he was from journalists. why don't you let the mission go, then

spokesman general spokesman no, magats, it's an independent institution, they decide. we, of course, starting to get confused, turned to the gentleman, come on, and told him that he said, you decide for yourself. he says. no, i myself do not decide, the department decides. i am not exaggerating now. i am retelling this, the official correspondence, the official negotiations that took place, and in the end everything was agreed. as you know. and our president, after contacts with his western colleagues, said that security is more important to us, if they so desire . mr grossel, i called and said, i'm sorry, i can't to come today, as we agreed. i’ll check back

later, because i was urgently called to kiev , which was not the case, in general, in the process of discussing the parameters of this mission, they proceeded from the fact that an agreement was reached when the mission was over. after that, mr. throttle will go to kiev, and then he will also talk with our representatives, and, as it were, based on the results of what he saw there and after which he will report. he is in the magat and e in the security council. well, here it is. uh, ukrainian twist. here is here, as want so and doctor. yes, you agreed on everything there. well, as mr. groise, come to me in kiev, you understand such napoleonic things, they look pathetic. this is an attempt to change. these external kvn are some kind of staged effects. uh, real serious work, yes. in this case, but

on the issue of nuclear safety, absolutely irresponsible. but the mission is there today, as i understand it, you were absolutely right about the messages of our military, and the landing of two sabotage groups that were neutralized. but i think, of course, this is a very high price. and for the world community to know the truth, but if ukraine wants to achieve it that's the way it is. the image and wants to show what it is. well. i just hope this doesn't lead to disaster, we are doing everything to ensure that this station is safe, that it functions safely and that the missions there e carry out all their all their plans. they say, we don't have, uh, the mandate to determine, uh, the culprits, but of course they'll be shown. uh, all those uh traces that

were left as a result of the ukrainian bombing of the ukrainian shelling and hmm, at our insistence, the mission should have, uh, ballistics experts. so hopefully we learn something. or rather, we know all this, but i hope that the world communities will also have such an opportunity. good afternoon, nika tikhonova, first-year student, faculty of olinguistics and intercultural communication, sergey viktorovich the expulsion of our e-diplomats unreasonable sanctions. cancel shared history. uh, despite this hmm do you see in the future the conditions for the normalization of

relations and if so, in what time frame thank you already. these are the terms of the normal, we have drawn conclusions for ourselves , conclusions that are based on long, long ones. uh, the years after the cold war. and when did we try to promote in every possible way in relation to the west? here, in practice, those slogans that the west itself offered us are running out. here, or rather, well, in the midst of perestroika in the soviet union, then after how the soviet union ceased to exist universal human values ​​common space economic humanitarian security space from the atlantic to the pacific ocean. the indivisibility of security no one will strengthen

his security at the expense of the security of others, no military union in europe should dominate and claim dominance. we tried everything to be fair. we uh developed and compiled and implemented. eh, in practice. uh, an unprecedented network of mechanisms to cooperate with the european union themselves twice a year annual meetings of the members of the government of the russian federation with the members of the european commission four common spaces, for which four road maps were adopted and implemented with an eye to introducing common by and large european norms into our daily lives , and agreements on 20 sectors from human rights to ecology, e-business, space technology,

uh, you can’t list everything, it occupied a separate place. uh, the visa-free dialogue that ended the signing at the first stage in 2007 of an agreement on a simplified procedure for issuing visas, which now the european union wants to either suspend or cancel, and the dialogue continued. uh hmm with an eye on the transition to a full visa-free regime, and everything was ready. in the thirteenth year in the thirteenth year before uh of those events that took place in ukraine, er, and which served as a pretext for the west to interrupt all our channels of interaction, but in the thirteenth year, when everything was ready for the transition to a visa-free regime between russia and this transition was blocked

by the european union due to openly declared political motives on the part of primarily the baltic countries, uh, i'm not sure, but, in my opinion, more so, but the motives that they presented. when considering this issue in the european union, there were the following yes, in terms of technology, biometric visas were also envisaged, and a number of missions were envisaged. uh, moreover, a number of missions were concluded with all eu countries, as preparation for this visa-free regime, but on political considerations. we baltics don't want russia to get a visa-free regime before ukraine gets it, georgia and moldova, that's all. that's all. uh, values, there is equality and so on impartiality, much more, but nonetheless. i say we have learned lessons. uh, for a long time , and every time our partners behaved not very, uh,

correctly and went from the fact that, well, we will somehow talk with them, they will draw conclusions and yet we will move in the direction of those slogans that they put forward, which approved, but not happened. now we no longer have any illusions, nor contract ability. ah, europeans. she 's obvious, like the americans. as a matter of fact, they cut off without exception the channel, about which i have just mentioned all forms of interaction, and we can no longer rely on given. here's what they're doing just about the sanctions. we ca n't rely on them anymore. e in terms of key technologies for our security to ensure food security, yes, and in general, accelerated development our society. we do not completely cut off e -contacts, but we will cover them and exclusively on a mutually beneficial basis. now it's a leftover

. somewhere, something is being done. well, for the future, but first it must pass. this is, uh , hysteria on our, uh, western flank. uh, they are still far from it, although sound voices are beginning to break through their dispute on russophobes. well, when if they stop, but i hope that when, ah, it should still happen, we will be ready to listen to what they will come to us with, but, uh, to build our life, our politics in the hope that in a year, two or three, even four or five, everything will return. therefore, you don’t need to finish how to deal with it. here is the creation of alternative formats for solving the problems of our development. this unpromising illusory. i

believe position. uh, so it's up to our partners when they mature. let's be ready to listen to them at this stage. i can’t say anything more, and, probably, there is no need to designate anything else. good afternoon dear sergey viktorovich my name is dmitry chukov i am a student international institute of energy policy and diplomacy mgimo, first of all, i would like to thank you for such an interesting lecture, and also ask the following question, given such a turbulent and rapidly changing situation in the international arena. what would you advise us, novice international specialists to focus on, which languages ​​and regions should become a priority for us in the medium term thank you. well, yes, we, of course, are

now undergoing such a restructuring on the march. uh, in connection with the ugly decisions of our western colleagues in e, the expulsion of dozens of our diplomats. and uh, at the same time we understand that objectively, due to what i am now describing the amount of work in the western direction. he just cringed, and besides the fact that the west itself blocked all, er, tools and mechanisms overnight. under the number of this uh, our diplomat is simply denied any contact. they're asking for a meeting to discuss, at least, even the functioning of the diplomatic missions, because , uh, we're having trouble financing the bank. western refuse to serve our e, diplomatic missions and cultural centers and

branches of our companies. we naturally take similar measures here and refuse service reply by the embassies of the respective countries. and at least such and such issues need to be discussed so that the diplomatic staff who are called upon, well, to maintain at least some kind of communication line work under normal conditions, even on these issues, uh, they refuse, uh, you write to us in the reception, - he says, in writing to you we will answer in writing. well if it's their choice, then so be it. there will be e in similar conditions and the diplomats of their countries will not stimulate otherwise. eh, these e our interlocutors to a normal conversation. and we now yes, we have somewhere. hmm, one and a half hundred, probably, diplomats. that won't let me lie. igor before. said left a hundred and fifty approximately. more more and

about the same number of administrative and technical personnel, well, about 90% of the diplomatic staff. we've already refocused. they gave the go-ahead for employment, either in the central office, or in embassies, on the territory of friendly countries, but because objectively work is now work, there will be more times the west has sharply reduced the volume of communications. well, we won't be knocking on those doors. uh, even more so, of course, i have already explained, uh, we have made fundamental conclusions. they are the reliability of the west as partners, and therefore we will now develop cooperation at an accelerated pace with other countries that do not join the sanctions, which perfectly understand what is happening in the world, which do not want to. be dependent on

the west is a centric system, including financial economics and who want to secure their own development. this will be achieved through e-e building up ties, including with the russian federation a. first of all, of course, the cis asia africa latin middle east uh about languages, well, as i understand it, uh, the university has plans to continue. uh, not an extension, yes, teaching foreign languages ​​to him is a recognized leader a in this in this respect. of course, we have an interest in the chinese language in arabic bengali vietnamese burmese are all countries that show accelerated

development rates mention indonesian malay so gali mention hebrew along with arabic. we have, despite some roughness in relations with israel , we have the current government of israel. which, of course, there is a strategic interest in developing ties with this country, where already under 2 million of our compatriots live. we have a good foundation. economic technological in culture in health care. here, uh, uh, african swahil languages, afrikans. uh, ahmar husky there. yes, and, of course, languages ​​in the direction of the cis countries are also important for us, and i heard that they teach here some kind of kyrgyz

kazakh uzbek yes, turkmen is also very important. but we are interested in continuing to teach european languages, after all, these languages ​​are spoken not only by those politicians who have somewhat lost touch with reality with the interests of their own people, but also cultural figures, science, art, uh, public public organizations with which we are interested to keep in touch and well, the classic classic four english french german spanish i also proceed from the fact that we will not cancel the culture of these great civilizations, we will show an example of respect for other people's traditions. uh,

unlike, again, those temporary workers who are now in power in western countries in some western countries. good afternoon dear sergey viktorovich thank you for your presentation. my name is evi viktoria korsukova, i have a branch of odintsovo, faculty of international law, the next question, taking into account the upcoming accession of finland and sweden to nato, how much will the threat of threats from the north atlantic alliance increase for russia? for us, this is the solution. e, to be honest, it was not a surprise, because recently, even in the west, in political science circles, in the relevant print

media, a lot of materials have appeared on social networks, which confirm that this process has been preparing for a long time, and the evidence of which is the active participation of both sweden and finland in nato military exercises as invited guests in recent years. we are in contact. here in these last years from helsinki with stockholm. well, they delicately posed this question and were interested. that's the fact that you are now participating in all these exercises on a regular basis, does this mean that you are moving a little bit away from neutrality. especially, that all these teachings developed against the background of the concept. uh general mobility that was promoted between the eu and nato and the meaning that is so

in general terms was that the territory of the eu countries that are not members of nato was accessible without any uh difficulties for nato military equipment, uh on an ongoing basis . well , you understand that it expands a lot. e. nato's ability to carry out its expansion, including in the east, so that we have seen how rapprochement with nato is happening, but how abruptly and the swedes of the efins announced that they want to fully enter and join the north vlatian alliance, uh, it was, of course, a little unexpected, given that, well, at least with finland with the finnish leadership. uh, on different levels. we had very trusting good

relations, which allowed us to raise any concerns in the field of security frankly, without embarrassment, uh, and uh contacts, we had military contacts and left sweden with finland and security issues were discussed and no insurmountable e problems e from our two northern neighbors, but we have not heard. e. well, now, apparently, some kind of latent work to prepare them for such a drastic decision was carried out. yes, it will change, of course, the geopolitical situation. uh, well, here there are options if membership is limited to just membership and further, in fact, participation in various events that has already begun. this is one story. if

military bases are deployed on the territory of these countries. uh, now they argue that there are different military bases, there are military bases light and real military bases. eh, well, there won't be any difference. although, of course, hmm, you will have to see what specific military resources will be deployed, if such bases, uh, our neighbors decide to create. or rather, if they decide to create these bases for them and are convinced that the main thing is that the americans will want to preside over this word. they are here to create additional additional material base to contain the russian federation there, hardly anyone will listen to finland, sweden. especially depending on how all of this is materializing of course we will make decisions to strengthen our capabilities in the northwest of the russian federation in any

case, the line of contact with nato, uh, will drastically increase by more than 1,000 km. now i don't remember the exact number. well, of course, it must be taken into account. ah, the statement of such activists. uh, the baltics in the baltics, in my opinion, this is the latvian minister. uh, defense or foreign affairs said that now that finland and sweden will eventually be in nato, uh, it must be done so that the baltic sea became nato's inland sea and blocked any possibility for the russian federation to use this water area. well, here is mr macron, he diagnosed nato a couple of years ago with brain cancer. i think you can contact the french doctors here. thank you hello

, my name is duvanova, maria i am studying at the international institute of energy policy and diplomacy in the direction of international business and international energy cooperation dear sergey viktorovich tell me is it possible military-political alliance of both russia and china to establish a new world order. thanks for this question. often given to any russian-chinese summit, it is preceded by discussions about what this means how it will all end. well, we do not hide from the world community. as our china develops, our relations with the people's republic of china, and we beijing do this transparently openly, our relations have reached. the highest quality level in the

history of communication between our countries and, uh, president putin chairman xi jinping. uh, it was at some stage a couple of years ago that they turned to the topic that you just touched on and in the statement it was adopted there at the highest level, in my opinion, there is not a day in 2000 or 2021, or in the twentieth there is not in twenty in the first year, it is said that russian- chinese relations have reached a fundamentally new level, which, in its quality, surpasses the classical military alliances of past eras. here's a conclusion from this. our military interaction is very close, if we are talking about military cooperation. we regularly conduct

exercises of all branches of the military and naval and strategic aviation anti-terrorist ground exercises. both bilateral and within the framework of the shanghai cooperation organization. uh, now east 20-22, chinese military personnel are participating in these military maneuvers, and we will not be with the people's republic of china and develop our unprecedented relations of a fundamentally new quality against anyone, this is also said in the documents approved at the highest level and putin hangs sentin. we will promote a positive agenda, first of all, and on the development of ties on the eurasian continent. we have. structure here eurasian economic

union which has a cooperation agreement with china we have a bilateral agreement with the people's republic of china on how we will use our bilateral ties to promote eurasian integration with the participation of the eurasian economic union with the participation of the sco with the participation of all others countries that are located on this common geopolitical this is exactly what president putin had in mind when he formulated his vision of the formation of a large eurasian partnership, and china, as you know, is promoting its project of one belt, one road, which is now harmonized with the multilateral structures i mentioned on the eurasian continent. so we are already aiming

at the unification of states, and not opposition. to whomever of them, but of course, when uh, the americans nato declare this region of its own fiefdom, this is what ended, among other things , the nato summit in madrid when it was stated that security in the euro-atlantic region and in india in the pacific region is indivisible and therefore nato should be obliged to have global responsibility when it is announced that it will be necessary to build up its military presence in this region , including the surroundings. uh, the people's republic of china and our shores. and when it’s not only the anglo-saxons, who have been hunting in this region for a long time. with their warships, but already the french, and here

the germans have recently announced that they are sending their fleet to hold back china, that's where the danger escalates, when the military military alliance e, proclaimed its goal to protect the territory of its members. it has already lost the meaning of existence. first there was the soviet union and the warsaw pact. they disappeared, then they came up with afghanistan; now they fled from afghanistan a year ago, russia appeared as a threat that the alliance should consolidate, but here they also understand that little has been achieved, so they decided now declare along with russia as a immediate threat china is a long-term strategic threat and here you are, these are the very rules on which they want to base the world order the rules

that say that globally in the economic sphere we will determine ah who has the ability to access to the resources that we control to dollars to euros to the resources of the world bank, where they have the majority, and where the executive directorate conducts, of course, western policy in the resources of the international monetary fund, and in the sphere security. uh, globalization means nato domination. you already know, i would say agony, because this plan will not come true. and if the americans and their satellites insist on such an approach to the development of cooperation or to the development of relations in the asia-pacific region, then they will drive themselves into a corner again, the way out of which a

and maybe, e is determined by some aggressive circles in the west , uh, only only military conflict. there are people who understand this, but very many take this, er, so easily, and most importantly, europe has completely submitted to this whole american plan, but has lost its independence and is doing everything that washington tells us, but we, together with the people's republic of china, are fine. we see these dangers. we will not let ourselves be provoked, and we will advance an agenda that will obviously be much more attractive to all countries in the region than the confrontations that the reserves impose. thank you hello, my name is polina voronina

i am a first-year student of the faculty of international relations sergey viktorovich. i have a question for you in the context of building up the economic and political potential of the countries of the east, as well as the current geopolitical situation, the turn to the east has become of particular importance for russia. in this regard. let me know your opinion. what will be the priorities of our country in the dialogue with such a significant partner as india to the east. he 's a little bit. hmm, this term will be misleading, because we never the soviet union, and especially after it appeared on the map of the russian federation as independent states, never tried, er, to do something in the eastern direction to the detriment of the

western direction. we tried our best. this is how our coat of arms tells us to look both to the west and to the east to develop relations with both europe and asia, uh, including east asia, south asia, and the endostan peninsula, but when europe cut off, uh, almost all, uh, channels of cooperation , leaving only some economic ties, then simply by virtue of the laws of physics, the east direction, uh became in absolute numbers, of course it grew. come on, but relatively it began to dominate in the external economic trade and other relations of our country, and india has always occupied, uh, one of the

key places. this is one of our priorities, and let me remind you that our relations with india would now be described as a particularly privileged strategic partnership many years ago. we agreed to call it a strategic partnership. then our indian friends. we have said little of this in our strategic partnerships with many. let's call it privileged strategic partnership, but even this turned out to be insufficient and, at the suggestion of indian friends in the territory, it is called a particularly privileged strategic partnership. uh, we have very close cooperation with india in the field of energy. and russian companies are working in india. indian companies are working with us in siberia and the far east very close and especially confidential military-technical cooperation, including

the production of e, corresponding modern weapons on indian territory. and we have, of course, uh, branching links along the lines of the agricultural sector, and along the lines of uh processes that we are now trying to uh develop together uh in the so-called so-called green transition. uh, nuclear power plants are one of the flagships of our strategic partnership. and where is he kulam, uh, and now practically substantive negotiations are already underway on preparing a site for another nuclear power plant, which will also be a few blocks. well, you can't list everything. it's really an attitude that rapidly developing and which rest on a very solid foundation. friendship, uh, since the days of

india's struggle for independence, and it is significant that now you know, when the west says, we must force the whole world to stop cooperating with russia and impose sanctions. and well, they did it. uh, quietly, they rush about and now they are proud to publicly declare that we demanded from such and such countries that they impose sanctions against russia, otherwise it will be bad for them from the point of view. uh, well, just not even diplomacy, but from the point of view of common sense makes no sense if, uh, such rogant public statements are made about people like india china turkey egypt indonesia when they are publicly threatened? really no one understands that the strangeness of such with such such not new such civilizations

have self-respect and uh, just insulting to hear, but such demands. yes, and in general, and if it were in a closed mode, it’s still the absence of any decency, and then when a great state declares that they must do something, according to a pointer from somewhere across the ocean. well, i can only imagine. what damage does it do. uh, long-term relationship damage. and with those who are engaged in such dictations, india does not want to join the sanctions of the indian leaders, including his colleague. foreign affairs publicly rejected any attempt. e connect them to the restriction on the purchase of russian energy. they have clearly stated that they

will follow their own interests. and just recently, literally today, an article appeared by one, but an indian e, political scientist and economist, which explains why india will not join the us sanctions and explains this not only to economic interests by economic calculation, but also to the common history of russia and the deep respect that exists in india regarding this role that our country has played in power supply independence of india and in the development of its independent economy so that we are very satisfied with these relations, president putin and prime minister modi met this year, they will still have the opportunity to talk. during

upcoming events, including this month will be the shanghai cooperation organization summit. well, i will definitely talk to my colleague in the near future, including at the un general assembly sergeevich you have already worked in good faith for 2 hours of professorships academically. how much time now i do everything for free in the country for two questions. okay let's go please. hello sergey viktorovich my name is ilya syskakov. i am a student of the faculty of international economic relations. if now moved from the mesopotamia of the indo and ganges to the shores, then we can notice that more and more often certain attacks began to sound from the side of ukraine and moldova towards transnistria, then from the east. periodically announces some plans to capture treasures

of ammunition and even prisoners for exchange with russia, then the west increases spending on the army. at the same time , almost all the population raises tariffs. can russia, in connection with these facts, somehow guarantee the security of transnistria and, by fulfilling the question, what can russia do? answer if there is an attack on this peaceful unrecognized transnistrian republic thank you about where moldova is going where i want to remind you once again of where i started and uh, that for many, many years we patiently consistently explained to the west about our red lines to everyone. it 's good. they famously explained about the unacceptability of what is happening not somewhere far away, but right on our borders, when the russian language was infringed on russian culture, and russian journalists,

including uh, were killed when they promoted nato close to our borders. and romania is a member of nato more a member of nato and have already actively looked at both moldova and ukraine in recent years, we told them that it is not acceptable to involve our closest neighbors in war games. and uh, by the way, in ukraine, we attracted attention. west for many years, as an example of what we are told, there is no russophobia, there is no nazism, but under poroshenko, his prime minister called the inhabitants of donbass not people, zelensky himself called them individuals individuals last year, when he asked. this is how you feel about the people who are

now in the donbass then the barley agreements should have been implemented, he said, well, you know, there are people who have relatives and added, by the way, that if someone in ukraine feels russian, then for the sake of their children and grandchildren. let him go to the russian federation, this was last september, a year ago, we attracted attention. there is no reaction from the west to this, no sign that they consider it something unacceptable. ah, and uh in this regard. here you see, we have a question, when our many years of appeals about direct threats to our security directly on our borders were ignored, then he was asked. what did you guys do? here you are what interests defended in iraq in libya, uh there, that in your

compatriots fellow tribesmen, someone offended they banned english french german languages ​​there. there was nothing like it, so here, when this is not because i want to say that they did, and we do. these are fundamentally different things. we can't get a fair response to our concerns about threats on our borders, and they can do whatever they want without any persuasion without any years of explanation, when it suddenly occurred to them that something was wrong in iraq or something was wrong in libya so they destroyed two prosperous countries, because they did not like what they call the regime there in both iraq and libya, but the result is completely opposite. maybe

someone will see democracy there, but so far there is only devastation and civil war and the prospects are very good. very disturbing. and this is impunity, it characterizes. i made such a small excursion in history. this is impunity, it also characterizes the attitude of the west to a number of other processes and, accordingly, brings impunity to those clients who completely fell under the west and carry out all its instructions and the west understands this and uses them in its own interests. here. uh, zelensky has now turned into just such a noteworthy russophobe every day some completely, uh, inadequate statements do, but because everything is permitted to him. this is not the first case, in our space for many years

such permissiveness was used by estonia and latvia, which frankly refused to fulfill their obligations to eliminate the shameful stateless institution. and all our appeals, both directly and through the european union and through the osce. uh, as we say, how they destroy russian education against a wall, demolish monuments, desecrate the graves of the liberators of europe, and nothing gets away with impunity, which they feel because the west told them. let's do everything you can, now they are trying on the same ideal of democracy, and which is allowed to do everything from, uh, the current leaders. uh, the republic of moldova hmm unfortunately, we see how malleable and the leadership in the gut of this kind of

flirting from the west and the provocative nature of the planting. there russophobia is obvious. is that how it was done? and in ukraine, that's the way it is. transnistria we have always stood for solving the problems of national minorities as part of the agreements on granting broad autonomy to moldova, just as in ukraine in the donbass, we supported an agreement on granting a special status. none of the ukrainian leaders have this special status. i didn’t even want to discuss it, despite the fact that there was a relevant requirement of the un security website and now the moldovan leaders are trying to get away from those agreements that were and which assumed agreement. ah, special autonomy, gagauzia, by the way, also has offline status. but what about our

interests. our peacekeepers are located there, there are our military groups, which are guarded by europe's largest warehouse of ammunition in sausage. and everyone should understand that any actions that will endanger the security of our military personnel will be considered, in accordance with international law, as an attack on the russian federation. how was it, how was it in south ossetia when our peacekeepers were attacked and retreated? thanks for the most interesting presentation. my name is markelova may. i am a student first-year student of the international faculty of law. i would like to ask a question related to the field and sports. how do you think? what is the likelihood that the international sports community, including

the uefa international olympic committee and others, will allow the participation of athletes from russia and in general. what attempts are being made together with him by sports to resolve this issue. i believe that many leaders of international sports federations and i am especially disappointed with the position of thomas bach as chairman of the international the olympic committee has discredited the principles on which sports movements are based, including the olympic movement, when the chairman could. as he did several times over the past six months, he says that we will decide on the participation of russian and belarusian athletes in our events. later, depending on how the political situation develops. this is a direct disregard for the principles of the charter, which

include the inadmissibility of introducing any political uh considerations political moments in the development of sports e, sports movement of sports federations, believe it? you know, if you look at it this way in retrospect, take the world economy dominated by the dollar, and even the euro is not very good there yet. can compete with it and the americans do not want to change this system. uh, to expand the possibilities for other currencies, but to be used by world trade, because this will objectively undermine, uh, the dominant position of the dollar, so they don’t want to see competitors, and when they announce sanctions against the russian federation in this

case, in particular, read western statistics, well, 90% of hardships, but america falls on europe, yes, their gasoline prices have risen there. they just absolutely, uh, don't see anything when gas prices go up. this is for them. the main thing is the measure of the effectiveness of the rulers, but, in absolute terms, compared to europe , there is nothing more than that, when they force it, it was a live broadcast of a meeting with sergey lavrov with students. the ministry of defense of russia spoke about kiev's attempts to disrupt the arrival of a worker groups of magadai at the zaporozhye nuclear power plant, ukrainian artillery fired at the territory of the station and the meeting place of the delegation with russian specialists. in the area of ​​the settlement. vasilievka four shells exploded at a distance of 400 m. from the first power unit at 6:20 in the morning,

two sabotage groups landed on the coast of the kakhovka reservoir to the northeast of the zaporozhye nuclear power plant. so, about 60 people arrived in seven speedboats . they were blocked by the fighters of the national guard, who are guarding the station, then to reinforce a military unit approached, the saboteurs were being destroyed. with the help of helicopters. another landing attempt to capture the station was near the village of v vodny around 7 o'clock in the morning. here, tactical landing forces came up on two self-propelled bazhs from nicolas barges were sunk. in addition, the ministry of defense reported an attack using drones, according to the department, on the eve of the upu. or three kamikaze drones on the territory of the nuclear power plant, all drones were neutralized, two of them fell on the roof of the victims' training center, and the destruction no, the ministry of defense added that despite the attempts of the kiev