but it's best to check. shelling of energodar recorded another hit at the thermal power plant, which is located near the nuclear power plant, part of the iaea delegation continues to work at the station, we will tell you what is in the program of the visit today. assassination attempt on argentine vice president cristina kirsch assailant standards unknown local media speculate magalogue politics save gun

misfiring final day of knowledge forum two hundred speakers in 3 days of work in the near future at the marathon site waiting for an official representative of the russian ministry of foreign affairs minister of finance of the g7 will discuss the introduction of a ceiling price for russian oil, will they agree on the plan today and what will it cost the author of the new restrictions? the authorities of energodar are carrying out repair work, damaged on the eve of the line after another strike, a thermal power plant was especially damaged. it is located near the nuclear power plant due to a drop in power, one of the power units had to be stopped; the second one worked normally, and before that, early on thursday morning, there were several attempts to capture stations in the ministry of defense of russia, the actions of ukrainian saboteurs were associated with the visits of seven rich believe that they wanted to interfere with the work

of experts. the delegation visited the station the day before , part of the group - these are eight members of the mission. the four escorts will continue to work at the npp during the visit of the magathen delegation to the zaporizhia nuclear power plant, artillery all three times bill across the territory of the npp, the head of the local administration, alexander volga, spoke about this earlier on the air of our channel already during the arrival and location of the mgt mission at the territory of the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant during a working visit, ukrainian, of course, if the blow to the e of the thermal power plant is two direct blows to the ferry crossing, which is located, and on the territory of the tpp, this is the transition between the tpp and the dachny settlement, then further along the coastline directly, which is located in the city energodar in dachny settlements, which are located in

close proximity to apartment buildings in the city further, then in the evening after the departure of the mgt mission, but the mission staff stayed with us, of course, were in the city and heard and saw everything, when he made three more fire strikes on the territory of the city, such damages happened to us yesterday. uh. naturally, as if, uh, this confirms and discredits, first of all, everything that is being done now by the ukrainian authorities on the territory of the city and the zaporizhzhya station. in the kherson region, after the impact of the apu, a large water elevator near novaya kakhovka caught fire, as the head of the district administration said. vladimir leontiev in full the berthing structures were destroyed, the building itself on the other side of the dnieper was partially destroyed, grain was stored inside, according to leontiev, it is still impossible to assess the degree of damage. after the failure of

the offensive on the south direction in the hospital. nikolaev delivered more than 2,000 wounded morgues are also overcrowded with such a statement made by merce snegirevka, this is a city in the nikolaev region. he explained that he received information from sources familiar with the situation in medical institutions. i will remind you of the offensive attempt that began zelensky's instructions were previously reported by the russian ministry of defense, according to the military department. army. lost ukraine. as a result, about 2,000 people are part of the nikolaev region, including the snegirevsky district, is now under the control of our military. and now the footage of the destruction of the position of the long-range artillery of the enemy of the russian hurricane system, the coordinates of the howitzer battery, the m-77 were handed over to our military by intelligence. russian vehicles are leaving the shelter and firing eight high-explosive shells. then the same amount after the change of fire positions of a hurricane, capable of destroying fortified points and armored vehicles. at a distance of up to 40 km,

it is extremely difficult to cover the equipment with a retaliatory strike. these machines quickly move to the stowed position and can change up to 10 points per day. we work out everything quickly, we get the goal, we return immediately, we work out the hagreva, then we charge and move on. it just moves. respectively. we are also confidently going to victory. the president of argentina declared friday a non-working day so that the citizens of the country could peacefully express their support vice president christina kishner. there was an unsuccessful assassination attempt on her, right outside her home in buenos aires, a thirty-five-year-old brazilian citizen tried to shoot a kishner with a pistol. but he misfired, the vice president was not injured, the attacker was detained 500 meters from the crime scene for his motives. hundreds of people are now being installed, they are on duty near the house, kirchner periodically they begin to applaud in

support of the vice president. russian and chinese warships joined the strategic command and staff exercises vostok 20-22 crews met in the sea of ​​japan and greeted each other in accordance with all the rules, and then completed a number of assigned tasks, including the defense of sea lanes and assistance to ground forces on our side , the corvettes, large landing ships, and auxiliary fleet. exercise vostok 20-22 will go on land and water until september 7, military personnel from fourteen countries of the world are engaged in them. a new school for 2,000 students was opened in izhevsk. this is a modern educational complex. the building has sports playgrounds, two swimming pools for a choreography class and

a gym. schoolchildren will be able to visit a theater and music studio, a design laboratory, fashion and culinary arts workshops. and children will also be taught how to separate waste collection, the educational complex was built according to the national project housing and urban environment, residents of a growing microdistrict. they waited for the opening of the educational institution for several years. it is important not only that we passed this school, it is also important that we have already started the second school on the stock exchange, the so-called green school. she will also very modern because here. well, already this school does not satisfy the demand of everyone who wants it. the area is growing faster than we will have social infrastructure. although for 5 years we have done a lot of three kindergartens, a school in a polyclinic. and now there is a live broadcast from the charge hall, where the

social science marathon takes place. you woke up. you are cheerful and cheerful, i look, charge me with your energy, please. i really need it now. thank you very much. ah. i finally see you in person, because the last time we talked, in my opinion, in may, it was just online communication, because the schedule did not allow, and it's great that we have the opportunity to combine the best. eh, what have you tried? and what mankind has invented. you see, we can meet with you in person. but when suddenly the situation suddenly changes, we have to help modern technologies. and now the same amazing opportunity that you have, and now you were told with whom with what

fantastic people you will communicate today. not only this number of people have it, but even a huge huge audience, which is located in different parts of our planet. can connect. and this same opportunity will be duplicated when the video of all speeches and all answers to questions. and by the way , the questions themselves will be saved on the portal on the website and will become part of world history, so i think this is a great combination and excellent command of new technologies, combined with what is traditional and invaluable personal communication for us. today we have very an interesting topic, it is formulated so playfully, but in fact a serious night you won’t spend how to see, the main thing, even if it is hidden. you know i'll do as i do. i usually do this for a certain amount of time. well, probably

people, or i’ll dedicate to what kind of brief it wo n’t even be a speech, but to such remarks, and then we will communicate with you interactively agree. great, because i think, in fact, what is not less important, huh? what speech is your questions? because if we are talking about truth and truth, then it is impossible, but to see and hear without reverse communication without dialogue, because any speaker, the most outstanding, the most high-ranking, the most hyped, he may not see the whole situation, and we are already starting to communicate on a given topic. he may not see the whole situation and only thanks to questions only thanks to such a dialogue are there opportunities to hear different points of view and

the ability to express different points of view and it is possible to achieve integrity of perception to find the truth to get close, maybe to compare facts to it, it's a really really good way to figure out what's the truth, what's the truth, where we're at, and so on. this is what is actually important when we ask ourselves and others a question. we correctly assess the situation. well, perhaps the most important thing in this case is to determine. and why do we need it for what? if this part of our profession, well, for example, a historian, a journalist, a teacher, again, the history of some kind of humanitarian discipline, a public

figure, publicist people who should own the situation, because they relay the point of view to a large number of audiences, it is unconditional. this moment of momentary understanding of what is happening is extremely important , again why, because we are communicating with a huge audience. but there is another category of people who are not connected with the fact that they convey the point of view to a large number of damascus people, they want to figure it out themselves, and here the question arises. is it necessary to draw a conclusion and is it possible to draw a conclusion on a global scale? here is now her minute or it is worth giving some time to not being professionals in the areas mentioned,

i repeat once again, there journalists are public figures, but i don’t know political scientists. now if we are talking about political or socio-political information. maybe it makes sense to give yourself a little more time just to work with the sources. the second point is to give yourself the opportunity to make sure that the first emotions from the perception of this or that news of this or that event may give way to your knowledge. should we let go of emotions? of course not, by no means, otherwise at some point we will all be replaced by artificial intelligence. and everyone will be replaced by a man, an amazing phenomenon of man. there is everything mind intellect, as well as feelings and emotions , and only in their combination. it is possible in my opinion. and

actually remain a man and draw the right conclusion. therefore, in no case should we give up our emotions, our feelings, someone calls our feelings. uh, it's intuition someone calls it someone's inner voice calls it, by the way, speaking, including conscience, but at the same time you can’t do it in such a way that emotions overwhelm you completely, so that you rely only on emotional perception. there is such a concept, it is now very popular as emotional intelligence. have you heard, perhaps? what is it? it seems that there is a word intelligence, but at the same time it is also emotional, when it acts on a person by, and not by conveying to him factual information, into which it can burst. e, taking into account the comparison of sources data, and, perhaps, some archival materials

or operational information, but affects his perception precisely through his emotions. resolution of sound picture a good infographic of the correct color scheme of the desired palette, which implies the inclusion of new, and some computer technologies or, including psychological works, uh, makes information not so much factual as very uh, so pleasant and convenient for transferring to another person without using his analytical skills right or wrong, and so and so, as everything in our lives. it all depends on the goals and objectives of use, how a knife can be killed with a knife, but with a knife. it can be done. an operation that will allow a person to survive and live for many years. it's exactly the

same here. unfortunately, many people use such a technique as manipulation during the delivery of the formation of the information flow, relying on such an emotional, and intelligence, as they say, on your perception, not only on yours, but also on your perception, and dramatic music, a selection of dramatic e, exciting shots. it is not a fact that, by the way, speaking of documentaries, it can even be artistic , bright, capacious such propaganda words, they can captivate you, they can form your opinion in one direction or the other. this may be a call not to remain indifferent to someone else. how does this experience help to answer. ah support, i

don't know, it could be a fundraiser for a child's treatment. it may be a call to protect, uh, some person, or it may not stay indifferent to some environmental problem, for example. or maybe a completely different story, or maybe the story of your inner destruction. when you, as it were, doubt arises when you are called to take part of some kind. well, including, but illegal illegal activities affect not only your intellect, but your consciousness. how much for your feelings and emotions, that is, a flame of passion arises in you, again, we ask ourselves questions good or bad, it all depends on the situation. what do how to understand? acting in this way, receiving such information, how to recognize it?

does it benefit or harm, good or evil? just again, we remember to give ourselves the opportunity, firstly, there is such a russian concept to cool down more calmly. think before you out of the beautiful, again a russian expression. measure seven times, cut once. it is this expression not only applicable to some of our active actions. this is a great way to perceive information seven times over it, think about it seven times, how so you all have a phone, you all have a computer, any kind of device, an operational possibility, or you yourself go, uh, into either this is the internet, or this is some kind of internet, or even

call those people who can do this or check there are books. there are guides. there are libraries. you can always rely on at least two to three sources in order to verify that information. the materials that you receive now are not talking about specialized areas. we are not talking about specialists now, who, in principle, in a different way and cannot work. yes, and never a doctor, never an engineer will perceive primary information without checking it either through their own knowledge and skills or through specialized literature. we are now talking about such mass consumption, because every day you are confronted with information of a completely different nature. culture. sports science politics, social activities, ecology, education, by the way, and you. naturally. here, including

in the framework of our today's meeting , you ask yourself questions. how to understand? as understand? after all, all this affects the feelings of emotions and most importantly, check, and you can check my words, how categorically we are told about this. add exclamation marks underscores bold and thus. we , as it were, perceive, perceive this information , we must perceive it absolutely categorically without variation, as the ultimate truth. well can you check? this is the first. this is the first such block e answer to this question. analyze the operation, including on your feelings of emotion feelings and your experience look for sources to double-check and, most importantly, do not forget to reflect.

this topic interests you. if you understand that this news will excite you, then it should be of interest to you. and if you are interested in it, you have already read something on this subject. do you know what source you can turn to? the second second block of the answer to the question posed during today's our meeting regarding how not to get caught, how i made sure that we were taken this, of course, er, well, i call it. this is for myself collecting sources checking sources and collecting them. what does it mean? look at me. i think that many of you read some information feeds, many of you subscribe to some information feeds, and rely on, maybe, the channel accounts of some

specific people. these can be public figures, journalists, people who are popular in one environment or another, people who you like. check them out. i'm absolutely serious now. you have a unique opportunity. it's just that it's very easy to double-check it; there's nothing complicated about it. no. i talk and tell about this little professional secret, and to those guys who have chosen public relations journalism, generally info-information as their main activity. see some forecast. you see some kind of analysis, which, again, is of interest to you, which you consider important and useful. and or which will be useful to you. what do you think of the future from the screenshot? copy, save with the date and with the name of the source and when this or that event

will take place, the one in question. or when it's over just time is enough time. it may be several months, half a year, depending on the situation, it may be a year, come back to this news, come back to this assessment. and compare what was said with the situation in which you find yourself, who are, well, to this historical moment in which you are now and much will become clear to you that will listen to your personal trust. and what is not, what has self-discredited itself? what has been confirmed? this is, in general, a very simple task and in fact quite effective and this applies as sources of information. so, as a matter of fact, the speakers are the people that you rely on in many ways, it's not so much you know checking them out it's more. checking you on

what sources do you draw on and what kind of speaker? you trust, but i would like more confirmation of my words. i say again, we are now talking not about professional areas of work, because for people who are engaged, but specialized in their areas for them, as a rule, this is not the question of people who are engaged in a wide sense of foreign policy history of international relations. for example, yes, like a huge number of my colleagues, but i know what source. to work whom to trust ah, they can already say e sparrow shot, and we are well aware that there are ah documents archives, e how to work with certain sources, and we are well aware that e appear here there is such an expression amazing story, the most unpredictable thing. it would seem,

as such, that the future can only be unpredictable, because we do not know it from stories. all clear. she already was. well, it seems to me that they show, especially the last ones. hmm well, not even a decade of a decade, this expression e not only has the right to exist, but it has fully justified itself, because new documents are being opened, because the truth is largely coming out after some time. and if earlier, in order to find out, and what actually happened, humanity was required. well, sometimes not like decades, centuries just passed because there were no mass media, because archives were not kept on such a scale mm. yes, because in general, mankind has not asked, but globally such questions that are being asked now then today, as a

rule, in order to understand. and what was inside some dramatic events, you only need to wait a couple of weeks, yes, it can take longer, therefore, half a year, but as a rule, here we have become a witness to the fact that for several years it was there 20 years ago those events that were falsified or who were part of some big production or dramatization, a the truth about them comes out in a few years, that is, for several years. now everything has escalated. everything is getting faster now. how can i give you specific examples? well, perhaps in history. the most striking example of such a verification of uh information is when they globally tried to manipulate us, and that was history. uh, the attacks and occupations of iraq and the wars against this country and

the wars within this country from the side of nato-centric from the side first of all, the united states of america here on january 31, 2003, well, almost 20 years ago, and the then president of the united states of america and the prime minister of britain, it was george w. bush and tony blair meets at a private meeting at the white house. they sign a secret protocol. the so-called manning protocol , and it was named after david meing's chief adviser. tony blader on foreign affairs in the protocol clearly indicated the next joint steps of washington and london on march 10, 2003 to start a war in iraq to legitimize the invasion of a new one, all people have already been promoted in any way i’ll say a case, that is, to give it legitimacy

to bring a legal basis for it, as it was written there in this document, to twist the arms of the united nations in exactly 5 days, the secretary of state of the united states of america, colin paul , brings a test tube with white powder to a meeting of the un security council. he claims that in iraq by that time there are tens of thousands of such test tubes and all anthrax and other biological agents are accused at the meeting of the security council by the american side of baghdad and directly the head of rakam huseynov development and storage. weapons of mass destruction , and after another 3 weeks, they blair officially declares that britain is ready to go to the end in march, 10 days later than the deadline signed and prescribed

in the protocol, the invasion of the cynical name operation begins, iraqi freedom, which led to the destruction of the statehood of this country , and as we know, then decades later used by terrorist elements to create a global tourism international which went down in history as isis and, in fact, the beginning of jihad against, but in general, humanity, as it was announced, again, of course, no weapons of mass destruction in iraq were ever found. it just wasn't there . as a matter of fact, they didn’t look for it, it was all a cover operation. it could be called that, but in fact it was a global manipulation. on a global scale, which was committed in order to capture a sovereign state and subdue not just the state and people, but

first of all its resources, its capabilities, its potential, which is quite large, a prosperous richest state, then. we remember for many years how colin powell, who recently left this world, repented that it was a terrible mistake. he called it that they took advantage of him, that he was promoted for this, but it was already then that they did it completely at the level of two states, then they led all the others who joined the iraqi coalition, giving people weapons, money and so on . the result is deplorable i'm talking about him i have already said that they are constantly talking about it, not just the destruction of statehood. not just the occupation of the country hundreds of thousands. just think about this number of hundreds of thousands, and many non-governmental

organizations, by the way, western ones, believe that even more than a million victims among the civilian population are only civilians, that is, people who represent the armed forces. in general, no one here does not include in these statistics. we are now talking only about civilians. and in principle, there were no official statistics. this one of the examples of how, at that time , the mass media were brought in by world public organizations, and people who were even professionals in their field, who professionally dealt with issues, but i don’t know. preventing the use of weapons of mass destruction by biosecurity issues and so on and so forth. i remember very well. and then i was just starting my work in this direction of foreign policy very well.

i remember trying. these were very active attempts people, including those in the west, resist this global manipulation. you know what it came down to, they even, uh, scientists and american scientists. uh, public figures, journalists went , went to iraq, went to the region in order to just physically be in this place and not let this crime, which was based on global deception, be committed. it was understandable. and by the way, uh, when they spoke in this protocol about the need to carve out the hands of the united nations. it was about, and this is all now already a documented fact, that they constantly brought there a draft resolution condemning cancer and demanding to start a military operation against this country and every time, despite the fact that there was not a human information company in

support for this american british position. each time under wild pressure, being in the permanent members of the security councils in the first place. it was russia, it was also china. it was. by the way, at that moment at that moment and france did not allow this lawlessness to pass and blocked the drafts of these resolutions as soon as we were not named, then, by the way, this was one of the first examples of that. how the culture of cancellation was applied in relation to the country, but then you don’t know who america was then trying to cancel. whose culture france tried to block because france was a member of nato and had to a priori support any, uh, any adventure that she was offered to make. well, it's like euro-atlantic solidarity. it's like, nato family, how is it that a nato country does not

support what the largest nato countries, the usa and britain, offer to do; france then had its own voice in its independent foreign policy. and most importantly, she relied on the knowledge that this was a falsification and did not support this adventure. you know what the united states of america went to then because i came there to work after literally 2 years. all this developed in 2003 in an active phase. arrived in 2005. you won't believe in english, well in this a lot practically. i think everyone knows english french fries sounds like french fries french fries got to the point where they say no you can't call french fries anymore, france is bad. let's, let's cancel it. eh, cancelled. everything was cancelled ; french cinema was canceled; french films were canceled, and the french were

mocked in talk shows on television endlessly, and with whimsical jokes , endless materials about what kind of country it is, what kind of people it is, and so on. well i think they would have canceled, uh, a lot of french culture if they knew, but there's a little bit of a problem with that too, so uh, it's basically just pop culture by culture. there were attempts of such a plan, but there were several years later, in the first place it became. it is clear that there is no weapon of mass destruction, because those who occupied this country simply did not present it. secondly, it became clear what are the true reasons for being there, and swimming in the use of natural resources, and the use a springboard for guidance, as they put it in quotation marks , is order in the middle east north

africa region, and the most complex region has many interests. well, as a matter of fact, simply, the materials that came to light are archival documents about how these decisions were made and what was at their basis, what was at their basis, and now the question is who was the person who gave the world the opportunity to get acquainted with these truthful materials . someone knows julian sansh correctly. created a website portal and by and large. it became even more than just information resources. this was a real discovery, a breakthrough in the world and journalism and mass. information and journalism in general, he told the world globally the history of this and anti-iraq adventure. what was done to him? we also use the manipulations of the western community in

his collusion, but i can’t say, i can’t even think of a word that is better to use and if one thing, all anti-legal invented stories were used in order to first start an information campaign against him. why persecution then come up with non-existent cases. he was accused of the most terrible crimes. uh, some completely absurd, and then just driven, and on the territory he was forced to ask , uh, to shelter him in the territory of britain in the embassy of another country, where he spent several years. just being, and the territory of this embassy house in the apartment. and going out to the balcony just breathe, and then it. you probably remember these shots, don't remember. they just carried you out of this house, when they finally decided to

board it and capture it. now he is already many months in prison, where, in fact, they mock him and destroy him as a person , a tragic story, but he made a breakthrough, he answered today's question of our today's topic. is it possible to make sure that we are not taken yes, sometimes at the cost of our own well-being and our own lives. but it's worth it. it's worth it, he showed how global information manipulation provocations can be. and what terrible consequences this can lead to, he entered his name, and this is not pride. this is not self-love. this is the real sacrifice of man for the sake of mankind. here he showed us everything. this is one

example, there is a second example from our today's reality, but regarding how the issue was manipulated, a very specific and extremely simple question for eight years. as you probably remember, the kiev regime told us. and by the way, saying all this to do more, but relying on western patrons, so to speak, that they are doing everything in order to fulfill the minsk agreements, let me remind you of the minsk agreements. it was a set of measures that allowed and made it possible to resolve the situation in ukraine peacefully through an absolutely clear roadmap , plans, program. call it what you want, the implementation, which would allow peace with internal political instruments with external assistance to prevent the degradation of the situation. here in kiev they kept saying that they are doing everything to ensure that the minsk package of documents is, but implemented. and they block him. here

today. we record the constant revelations of people who are not just public figures journalists and publicists, but real politicians who are standing by real ones. and so to speak, the decision-making levers of many over the years, uh, in ukraine, who officially declare that immediately after the president of ukraine signed the minsk package of measures , a decision was made not to implement it first and the second is preparing for war. from poroshenko, who openly stated this, this is not some secret data, this is not some kind. listening results. these are not even some materials obtained by journalists and so on or merged by someone no. this is his direct speech to danilov, who is the leader.

and with the nbu, which, literally this week, made a statement regarding the plans for the implementation of the minsk agreements. there was no kiev regime, and they immediately understood that a power scenario lay ahead. that's all. we have been talking about this for many years. we talked about the fact that we are doing everything in order to prevent the degradation of this situation, and then we use a forceful scenario, realizing that it was a real chance not only for ukraine and, probably, not so much for ukraine a first of all for europe yes, and for, probably, the whole world. as a real opportunity to use the peaceful political negotiation toolkit to

resolve the most difficult situation, but there were other plans, so to the question of how difficult it really is, but to separate the wheat from the chaff. and what kind of primary tools can and should be used from my point of view, and i am ready to answer your questions for this. let me take a seat in our hall to help. thank you marina vladimirovna, take a seat. guys, already preparing their questions, let me start the first one and ask myself. uh, now world politics is becoming more and more a woman. here i will quote valentina ivanovna matvienko the world. tired of brutal male politics, the era of soft power is coming. here, do you think women are more in line with compromises, and how does this apply to women diplomats? i

don't want to seem like a bore. ah, but still i like to look at the root of the problem. do you understand b what uh, well, really the problem of this modern approach to the problem of male and female, and we talked about it just at that forum, which was created on the initiative. and valentina ivanovna matvienko e. forum women's forum, which is held in st. petersburg is not the first time. uh, women from all over the world are gathering, who are not just their lives, their fates, their own efforts. proved that they can change lives. for the better, these are politicians and public figures. uh,

leaders of parliaments, ministers, leaders, by the way, speaking countries political parties. by the way, i remember very well when this initiative appeared. it appeared just after the first so-called approach of the western regimes to the projectile called isolating russia after the fourteenth year. and so valentina ivanovna suggested like this at once, she says to isolate russia yes, you will never succeed, and she came up with and organized this women's forum and women from all over the world began to come to our country. speak on the most relevant topic simply in an open microphone without any attempt at censorship at all and so on to speak on all topics to the whole world, and this has become one of the and one of the most authoritative women's forums. and in general, poly-socio-political forms, so at the

forum that took place in the fall of 21, that is, well, almost a year ago. didn't give a word. and quite unexpectedly, because i performed at other panel sections, but somehow they didn’t plan, my performance was not announced at the plenary. and when they give you the word suddenly, and then you will always talk about the most important, that's what you think is important, i repeat, then, because this is really part of the answer to your questions. you know, when they used to say, and they divided it into male and female. clear. here are men, here are women, when they used to talk about equality, that a woman should have the same number of rights, it was also clear. what it is. but this means that wages should be the same as well, in general, without compulsory housing at positions, that is, necessarily fixing. how many

female male positions should there be, that it should be 50 to 50, but there should be a really fair attitude and an orientation towards professional skills, and not dominance, for example, one sex, and so on, everything was quite simple and a woman who, with her work, with her business their responsibility, their love, their profession, but they proved that what was left for someone else, maybe, uh, so to speak, it’s questionable what, well, really this is equality obviously. yes take doctors teachers, take well , whatever you want. look anyway. clear. yes, how big is the role of women in a in society in its development and so on. that was enough. it just wasn't easy for the women who dedicated their lives to standing up for those rights. and for the audience, in general, everything was simple and clear, and

today, what, and you try to answer your own question. how many sexes or so-called genders? well, for example, i don't know in france in the usa in canada there are not two of them now, we have two men and women. and there are 80. we will now answer this question regarding the role of a woman in politics. are we supposed to talk more? please tell me, is this gender number, 57. or how? or do we mean genders from five to 63? you understand why we have come here, you understand that the problem is already on a different level today, that the world, alas, under the influence of these very, implementers or activists of liberal dictatorships, has come to blur, and in many ways to destroy the

basic concepts for you and me and this is a relative question. uh, the topic of our announced today meetings and how to make sure that you are not held after all? you look how juicy. with what fantastic agitation and with what material resources we are told that there are genders, yes, but there are at least 80 of them, or even more. it's real, this is what scientific symposiums are devoted to, we now put in quotation marks a huge number of works devoted to this. but what is the most important thing for those who doubt this or those who defend a different point of view, arguing that after all genders, maybe i don’t know how many, but sex 2 they are subjected to colossal persecution. this is the question of how not to allow ourselves to be manipulated, there is definitely something that is still hidden from us, something that science has not even come

close to, and we must be open to new knowledge and so on, but we must distinguish when there is an attack on the fundamental principles that are part of our, i do not know the cultural code of the civilizational code that what distinguishes us people there from animals. i do not know this phenomenon of nature and so on. here, so that it doesn't could encroach again i am open to all e new research. i hmm i believe that a you know what to say. oh, well, again. let's look at history. how many people who discovered something new in this world, how much did they suffer? and, by the way, they sacrificed, including their own. with them, or their fates were simply knocked together, because they tried to tell the world that well, i don’t know either the earth revolves around the sun in the sense that the sun does not

revolve around the earth but what is everything on the contrary that the earth is not flat? well, a lot that people discovered, yes and uh, no of course, we should we should use science, but we should not allow it. which, unfortunately , is now a world trend in western totalitarian regimes, liberal dictatorships , dehumanization and answering briefly to your questions, but we, of course, still need to start now with the main preservation of our identity, our e our e, really the achievements of our civilization and not let the concept of human perception be imposed on us. dividing it into tens of hundreds of some strange subspecies, a and pitting us on this occasion, all people, of course, are different. everyone has their own destiny. everyone

has their own peculiarity, everyone goes their own way. temptation, ups, downs, accomplishments, and so on, but you can’t destroy the basic ones. there is a man and there is a woman. and how they manage their destiny is their business, because everyone has their own destiny. thank you , let's go to the hall with our guests. i'm sure there are questions, please help maria sergeevna my name is yaroslav will come, and while vladimirovna was sick , oh, i'm sorry. i'm just worried. sorry that sergey viktorovich my father, but this is only if professionally vladimir yuryevich forgive me, please, my name is yaroslav czech i'm from

tvir, school number 35, and i think many in this room are familiar with your poems, including because the song on your verses were performed by such stars as valeria zara nargiz and how do you decide who the song is suitable for? oh what, thank you very much. i don't call poetry. these are still such texts or some lines that come. ah, poetry is the lot of poets. i have never been a poet i didn't even feel that close. these are my emotions. eh, work enough. we know e with such emotional intensity, to put it mildly, but these emotions. you must a keep it everywhere. you have no right in many respects to express emotional evaluations. don't know that you shouldn't speak with your soul and heart. well, you still, but you say no to yourself, you say, or

sometimes even you are instructed to speak with your answer, and voicing the position of the state, therefore, this is emotionality. and well, in many ways, even suppressed and come. i think it looks like this sometimes some kind of poetic lines, and sometimes a song is obtained from them. and how do i get acquainted uh or how? it turns out our creativity, and i think that this creativity with this or that, but singers or the same creative people, but it happens in different ways . just our casual acquaintance. oh, i heard you write something? oh, and i know you sing oh , but, by the way, there are absolutely some amazing ones, someone even called mystical meetings. as we, for example, had with max fadeev quite by chance did not know each other just defended phrases exchanged some links. and suddenly there were songs. by the way

, bring back the memory. and although max fadeev is not listed there. eh, as the author of music, but without him this song would not exist, it's not only an arrangement of it and generally inspire- he inspired it to become, really hmm the song that became, but hmm and there are uh, more like this , for example, we recently released, and the song that was performed by lusich botino, and she struck me with her timbre. i didn't know her, i was personally allowed to listen. i say oh what a fantastic voice. uh, it would be interesting, and now a song called junseong has come out, uh, it is the first english-language song in english. and the june song it is called the song of june, and i am very grateful to her, i am grateful to lucy for the fact that she performed it like that, and performed it. yes, you can imagine, we

met her personally only when she had already recorded a demo of her and instantly somehow. here we met. we all lit up. we understood each other, we came up with it, we immediately came up with it, the clip launched it all and it happens like that, but sometimes you know you can, if you let me. literally, i will say, a really very interesting story. hey, how did the song come about? i loved you too much, and she appeared based on the real story of not just a real character, but the singer am lyuba uspenskaya, who lived a very dramatic moment in her family with her daughter, a and told once about it on television. i didn’t hear it myself, but my mother did, and suddenly i come home, and my mother, who doesn’t watch talk shows, usually has other interests. she is an art historian. she is a person who is devoted to the kultura channel is literally in tears and begins to tell me

how she switched the channel and heard a dramatic story, and how she struck her precisely in the context of the relationship between mother and daughter, and it struck me. this is already in turn. so literally through a. it 's not there for money. i brought. here are the lines i sent. they are loved to be spoken. here is my mom. but this is how she took your pain, and after a couple of days, lyuba sent a recorded song. it even happens like this. thank you and let's have one more question from hall volunteers. please help with microphones good afternoon maria vladimirovna my name is kemer i came from the republic of tuva, uh. i would like to ask you. but you once said that in the process of a dispute, truth appears. so, and i said, i quoted, in general this is not my statement. i would like to ask you

if this applies to diplomacy? diplomacy a-a, use ah dialogue to resolve conflicts. that is, if you and your partner with partners, these can be friends. and by the way, saying no, friends and allies and in in general, initially, located on the other side, but of this or that problem, and people of the organization are sometimes countries. a-and you can be different, if you initially do not have contradictions and you do not need to. as a matter of fact, uh, some kind of problem-solving methodology . is everything ok. you hmm with different people, but in this case the same. look for some questions. but when you have history

leads you into a situation of contradictions. that's when diplomacy is one of the methods. this is certainly a discussion of the problem, so to speak, exchange of arguments bringing facts, and this is certainly a sport and the search for common ground. that is, when you understand that you will still look at this situation differently, but at the expense of finding common ground. you can start it, for example, by solving damage minimization or shifting the center of gravity to some other nuances that can get you out. eh, so to speak towards the light, so this part of diplomacy is certainly in many ways. this is her main component in some situations, maybe the main component, but

it certainly is. thank you and music to you one more question from the audience. uh, volunteers can blitz, please, your time allows, there will be a blitz. let's take a few. let's go guys then. uh, then the microphone. please pass on and introduce maria vladimirovna hello. my name is vladislav borsenkov and i am a fourth-year student in the field of international relations at lugansk state pedagogical university. maria vladimir you are now called a diplomat. e blogger say a in the blogosphere also use the same rules that she negotiates and meetings and also arising from this issue. what trends would you name in public diplomacy. thank you. here you answer your second part of the question is the answer to your first part of the question as new forms develop. what communication informing work with the public, and bringing with any

information. forms of information exchange, they are different and now today for many years. uh, there is such a form as a don’t know social networks, and posts uh materials in the form of short comments, or rather such a m-m more voluminous point of view, which is expressed. as you say in blogging. and this is just a form of work, but it came one way or another, firstly, in connection with the development of this part, which is called social media, many people call newere. social networks new media and second, anyway. well , let professional traditional journalists not be offended by me for a shift somewhere not completely for a shift, but in development.