these are some decisions absolutely according to the decision, if it tries to implement it, it will not lead to anyone good for those who make this decision, but there are contract bloods. in addition, all contractual obligations are supply contracts. and that some decisions of a political nature that are contrary to contracts will be made, but we simply will not comply with them. and we will not deliver anything at all. if it is contrary to our interests. in this case, profitability, we will not supply gas, oil or coal. to me this communication fuel oil will not deliver anything. we will fully comply with our contractual obligations. but if someone tries to impose something on us, then i want to note those who impose something on us are not in the position today to dictate their will to us. let them come to their senses, but in the economy this is the case everywhere, including, uh, and in domestic economy. and if we return, we will not deliver anything to those, about the catish one, about whom you spoke, as i said

outside the framework, nothing. she will not be forced to do so. exactly. we will only have one thing left, just one, like in a well-known russian fairy tale, the wolf's tail is dead. it uh, they have, by the way, uh. several decisions and we see what is happening there, it means either to subsidize high prices and this is bad, because it will not change the behavior of consumers will consume, as before in conditions of shortage, they will grow, or to reduce consumption from an economic point of view is socially dangerous, can bring to the explosion is better to adhere to contractual obligations, relevant rules and civilized relations. but we, too, within the country must act in a civilized way, creating preferences. act carefully, uh steadily step by step. uh, without

any leaps, uh, come to us. we are doing just that for other purposes, and we intend to continue to do so. and i also want to ask you a question about the relationship between business and the state. you said on previous forms that the role of the state always grows during a crisis. and i will now give a few examples of 2008. remember, you probably promised to send a doctor, the owner of the mechevo was given an interview in 2020 and when you were asked about the fact that you perceive businessmen as crooks by definition, you answered with a quote under this revenge, certain reasons. last year, before the st. petersburg forum, i talked with deputy prime minister andrey lever belousov . he said that metallurgists have slammed us, based on these examples, how the state is now building relationships with big business with businessmen. no need to pull out individual phrases from the general context. e. the issues that we are

discussing, including i will not comment on what i said now, er, and if i spoke in relation to specific individual representatives, uh, the business community, uh, something, this is related to individual representatives, and not to the entire business community as a whole, and these are my dream business community. in general, russian today demonstrates its highest degree of responsibility to the country, to the motherland. before the citizens of russia, i want this, but i also want to note and thank you for it. here is the first one. by the way, many people there, uh, i told them at one time there, you know, that she runs. if there it protects its interests. uh, they had something arrested there, accounts, boats and so on, would have warned about it. it would be better if these boats were kept here, and the money would not be invested in foreign assets, but in the development of russian infrastructure. nothing would be lost. would be here at home and would

receive profits from the money invested. okay, this is a lesson for everyone. and who would have thought that they would go for this and talked about it and warned. well , just not because i'm smarter, because, because i have more information i warned and spoke about it, but many, by the way, speaking, including those sitting in this hall, realizing that there was nothing there, especially they didn’t keep it over the hill. and everyone here in the house turned out to be right. actually, it means, uh, with regard to the entrepreneur, i said, but uh, as for the fact that belousov spoke about the fact that someone slandered someone? well, yes, you can’t say anything in the woodpile, but this is only more than once, it simply speaks of the correctness of those theses about which i just said, but there are certain definite e, certain rules in economics are objectively impossible. it's just that the name cannot be neglected, but why did

the metallurgist, then, keep the price high? yes , because such a conjuncture has developed in the world markets. well, what can you do about it, and they, of course, way. e, answering e, to its employees of its enterprises in their industries, achieving maximum profit, this is done simply by the state should have responded in time to this, apply appropriate market mechanisms and tools in order to restrict exports or get back trace profits in various ways. they are market. they are well known to everyone, either with the help of customs duties, or return. this means that this is superprofit in a different way, but entrepreneurs working in this area, of course, should have known in advance what the state is intentional and can do in this sense. well, it's just necessary. it's such a thin sphere, a thin fabric. uh, interaction within

the economy, there is nothing so terrible here, everything is regulated calmly, and we will do it carefully in the future. and here, if we talk about my conditions, we created them so that they stay here and leave offshore. and now i know that they register in russian, but this is a question because they are afraid that they will take it away again or we have created normal good conditions. there is a problem. you are right, there are absolutely problems that need to be created, and above all conditions, and above all this is connected, of course, with reliability and with the rights to protect property. this is absolutely you are right. and uh, here's a significant part responsibility for the aging of the state. as for tourism. yesterday there was a presidium of the state council for tourism, which was held here in vladivostok, and i would like to ask you to more clearly define your position on visas , we have, uh, a lot of visa-free agreements with latin american countries. and with europe, uh, there are practically no. however, on the contrary, european

tourists, it seems to me, could go here, maybe not be closed, but there with some kind of tourist curtain, but rather let them in. yes i do i share your point of view just like let's say. in the sphere. uh, we won't let anyone force any decisions on us, their hands are short, but uh, but we shouldn't do anything in this area either. the fact that sergeyevich lavrov will be angry with me for contradicting our interests, probably because it is taking away, because the foreign ministry is always acting like a mirror. eh, we spat. we, too, must respond with a spit, there and so on. uh, it means, uh, our visa was closed, and we also have to close it, everyone doesn’t need to do it, which, uh, does not meet our interests. we are interested in what young people came and taught us, yes, well, why should they close, we are interested in the business coming here and working. we have, despite all the restrictions from such a lot of businessmen who love russia and trust. you wanted to work here, didn't you? welcome please, let them

come and work. uh, do they limit them like that or do we have there, let's say, well, tutors come to teach our children. let them come and work. what's wrong here? uh, i don't know athletes, for example, children of art. why do we limit we will not. uh, uh, uh, cut these contacts. and those who do this, they are not isolating us, but themselves, but yesterday, as i understand it, at the same presidium there was a small dispute about the rostourism for renting a gas station. i did not agree with this, when the scheme will be built further, what decision was made later, everything is very simple, in fact, and everything is also a little pragmatic. but firstly, of course. e domestic tourism is extremely important and inbound tourism. it is very important for us. the vast country of our friends

colleagues here have been talking about our friend from the people's republic of china and all the rest from mongolia of treason. well, i'm not talking about uh, the countries closest to us, uh, the former republics of the soviet union, including uh, including um. uh, armenia everybody knows. well, the tourism potential of russia is colossal, but, of course, we need to do a lot in order to develop the infrastructure of domestic tourism. i won't list them all now. e these there are many tools, and we will develop them. here is yesterday's discussion. eh, very very simple. er, who should master the 10 billion rubles that are provided for by the order of tourism development programs, or the ministry of construction, or the growth of tourism. it really doesn't matter to me. well, uh, there is a logic to both menstruation, after all, uh, professional refers to such issues related to the development of

construction infrastructure, but just tourism, only 100 people work. yes, according to rostourism, it doesn’t even matter that it has 100 people. and it is important that they understand what is needed develop. and this is an important tool, and tourism growth still determines the direction of development of the industry, so it would be quite logical to direct these funds through e, growth, but in the end, the government should decide on its own. i think that a decision will be made in the near future. there is nothing so complicated here , but nikolayevich wanted to ask you. here we are talking about tourism, but now armenia is facing you. e with an influx. so to say, there are a lot of very russian labor migrants who came to armenia to work, yes, who do not agree with what is happening there in ukraine, including. e. what role do they play in the economy of armenia now, how did they fit into your society from gol before

i want to answer, even more argument came to russia, we have historically two million people. well, there is nothing new in this, that armenians in russia are happy to say that i don’t really agree, but with your assessment, in the sense that many people came simply, because they need to get paid, because they in fact, while in russia, they work abroad because of problems. e with financial transfers. then. they have just relocated to armenia and i hope that in my speech i tried to present our point of view. and, in general, i hope that this is perceived in russia as uh? movement within the eurasian

economic union but the eurasian economic union and for this it was created, to enable free movement of goods, services, labor hours, capital forces, now, we see, in reality. here is vladimir vladimirovich he spoke about this, that he warned about some future problems that might arise for those businessmen who work in the west, but i think that the eurasian economic creation for such situations arose so that the economy of our countries would be more flexible, but now it's obvious what i've already said. but to be fair, i must say that in january-february we already had high economic growth, but ah marty

, oh, there are already problems and, uh, concerns. but uh, of course, and those russians, those uh, flows, who came, uh, to armenia, they helped out a lot and help out and we are very happy and we are about this uh and uh constant contact with our russian colleagues, because there is also with vera that we can develop together now. uh, we and uh, appeared very good from the speaker. the interests of the russian regions are to work, uh, together with the armenian colleagues. well , you asked about, uh, possible sanctions. i want to draw your opinion to the next question, if theoretically armenia falls under sanctions. this is not useful for russia. therefore,

what do we offer. we propose to cooperate e, competently and use. these are the opportunities in place that have now opened up and also notice those threats that not only uh concern armenia but also the eurasian economic union of our cooperation in order to manage and how to neutralize these threats. so i really think so . those, uh our uh russian citizens who came to armenia we are very happy for them and, by the way, when uh hmm in the first half of this year at the beginning of the year. we discussed it, i drew on hmm uh attention of our russian colleagues, uh to the next one. uh, if they e relocate, if possible, so to speak, they fight in armenia, yes, but in the

eurasian economic union, the likelihood that they will return to russia from armenia is many times greater than they are if they work, for example, in france or in the united states because people are leaving here very now. uh, and uh , it used to be that a lot of russian tourists came on vacation. uh, to armenia i’m going on vacation now, uh, they’re coming to russia, and this too, to see friends and relatives. and it wasn't just before you came to yerevan. everything is very cheap. and now the prices have gone up. well, that's another question. yes, that's a different question. and we also have a rather big problem with real estate, because prices for real estate in

armenia are growing and prices for rented apartments are also growing, this is a problem, but this creates new opportunities, because uh. a year already, if i'm not mistaken, already 13% growth in construction in armenia , and this is uh, and i thought that uh, this is russian business is also interested in investing in this area. and by the way, i want to say that and something else is very important in the context. here are the possible economic problems that, despite the fact that we are cooperating very closely with the russian federation in this context. now the international rating agencies are raising uh, hmm uh, or uh, confirming the good ratings of the republic of armenia, i also want to draw the attention of the russians. e businessmen, what, uh, armenia is making great progress in the ranking of uh

countries, uh, free economy and i must say, that in this context we have, but new ones have appeared. fight and we hope that we will get into these in this ranking, the best ten on a global scale. i think that, indeed, there are very good opportunities here for economic closeness and cooperation between russia and the army. it was still at a high level for us, despite the fact that russia has always been, uh, the number one trading economic partner of the republic of armenia for the last thirty years, but now it is still important that there is an opportunity to change and the quality of this uh, uh this is economic

cooperation. thank you let's take the opportunity to find out how people in russia perceive those who leave for armenia vladimir vladimirovich how we treat such migrants. uh, we welcome everything that is good for russian business, if the conditions are right, so now people are working expediently, mostly it people. yeah, uh, and it's better for them to work quietly. there for god's sake after work. i fully agree with nikolaevich. really. eh, armenia is not a stranger. the country is all nearby for us, we can work in yerevan and come, uh, and actually live in moscow, uh, so, uh, nothing interferes. many already returned understood? what's nothing like that? nothing terrible is happening here, even taking into account this sanctions aggression against some countries, everything works with respect to russia, everything functions stably. well, if someone likes to work in armenia, please, just

like, say, the head will not be very offended by me. we are in a normalization trend. if someone likes to live in baku let them live in baku and in kazakhstan they created very good people there, they created a financial zone, but of course, everything that is connected with the countries of the eurasian economic community. it's easier for us to regulate, it's easier for people to work. this is an obvious thing. i will ask one more question, which concerns those who live in the far east and elsewhere. ah, the seas. uh, our country to you vladimirovich at the end of the year, in my opinion, should lie on the table. uh, second uh, someone's investment bill. there on the crab on the harvest of the crab and uh, a very big concern for the business in the field, that small medium enterprises. they simply cannot and will not be able to fulfill this law. that's what you say, so about this, well, yesterday we spoke in detail about this with the governor. e, oleg

nikolaevich. uh, there are problems exist. yes? what is it? this one eh? this is 20% of the total quota that is allocated for the catch, bioresources, fish, crab, and it is directed to the construction of ships. this is the so-called quota podkil and or e, fish processing plants on land on the shore of e, in this is a necessary measure, related to the aging of fishing boats, uh, and. it operates effectively and has already concluded, in my opinion, over 100 contracts. e for the construction of factories and for the construction of ships. uh, many have already been implemented and enterprises and ships have been built. uh, built already launched. er, so that works in the direction we want. but there is, of course, a problem, which lies in the fact that some enterprises are small, having taken on these obligations, having received someone near

kiel for the construction of factories. in connection with the vision these sanctions, about which we spoke, cannot timely fulfill their obligations due to the violation of logistics supplies and, if not the fulfillment of obligations from , uh, from their foreign partners, of course, the government must take this into account. i am here we are heard now a lot of talk about the international agenda about energy security, in general about the new security structure, the day before, the report of the itf appeared on what is happening at the zaporozhye nuclear power plant, the report does not say who shells are indicated in the report. uh, the damage that you noticed uh some comment. you trust this report. yes, i certainly trust this miracle. e. mgt is a very responsible

international organization and the leader is a very professional person, they are, of course , under pressure from the countries where they work, including the united states of european countries, and can not directly say that the shelling comes from ukrainian territory. well, these are obvious things. we control the station. there are our military personnel. why are we shooting on our own, or what, nonsense? just a dog in another way is impossible to say. eh, when i say my western partner. well, what did we sit with you? well, yes, it is, as it were, as if it does not fit with common sense. this is the first. the second there are fragments. these himorians are lying around and another. uh, other western weapons . eh, whether they create these threats or not, of course they do, of course they do . i saw in the report it is said that, uh, it is necessary to consider it necessary to remove there, uh, military equipment from the territory sanctions, but there is no military equipment on the territory of the station. uh-huh it's basically, uh, employees. the ministry of internal affairs

should have seen and now they can. because two remained there, and there, uh, the national guard stands guarding just the perimeter and the inside of the base of this very station. that's all, but they fixed a couple of cars there. there, it is the russian guard that is guarding the station, ensuring that it is safe. if you want, you can bring anyone there even tomorrow, including a large group of journalists, including european or american journalists. let him look, yes, and you can see where, uh, the shells are flying along the energy gift, right from the opposite side of the reservoir. we know where and uh, well, our equipment, including military equipment, which, uh, provides counter-battery combat, but it does not find it at the station. it's moved out of the station's perimeter quite far, but uh, the ukrainian side is

creating threats. uh, security breaches. nuclear safety, why are they doing this? to be honest, i don’t really understand, just to draw attention to my situation, or something, create an additional crisis. this, by the way, speaking, we don’t often talk about it, but we don’t even try to hide it . uh, nuclear power plants close to our facilities. well, that is, they are purposefully working in this direction. uh, why uh what 's the point of creating threats for the whole of europe, i honestly don't really understand, but they do it. uh, and i asked yesterday for the head of rosatom or khachev. uh, uh, uh, to uh rossa there nevertheless, he presented additional proposals for ensuring security, because there is still the main threat. even this is not a reactor. and

storage. the vanilla has been worked out, but at the same time, the head of european diplomacy, jose barrel, if possible, i’ll read the quote now, i found this translation right now. today we are meeting within the framework of accession negotiations with representatives of ukraine, so far we do not have a concrete plan. how to defeat fascist russia and its fascist regime and what is it? it has something to do with atomic no power plant. yes, it has none. it's just that he gave such a description, he is a great specialist in this area. uh, so we saw calls calls. uh, heads of european diplomacy to defeat russia on the battlefield, a strange diplomatic setup. if he were a minister, er, some kind of defense from outside. one could understand this rhetoric. and for e the chief

diplomat and the european union it sounds. uh, it sounds really weird coming out of his mouth. here. well, god be with him. ah, god be his judge. let him say what he wants as far as fascist regimes are concerned, well, you know what to say. uh, if only he lived in the thirties. he's a spaniard. yes, spanish. if only he lived in the thirties in spain and heard in the weather report. the well-known sacramental phrase over all of spain cloudless skies as you know, it was a signal for the start of a coup d'état on the part of general franco, he would have taken up arms, and on whose side was the democratically elected government of spain of that time or the other side of the fetters chistov in my opinion, he would be on the side of the putist, because today he

supports just the same path of the clean on the territory of ukraine. the primary source of power of today's government is the state translation of 2014 , he supports them, and then he would have been on the side of the nazis, for sure. that's who is on the side of the nazis. uh, it's the first second today. he supports the active ukrainian government just like the whole of europe. i have discussed these topics many times. e with european partners, and we always point to the neo-nazi trace in in power today's government, kyiv and they answer me all the time. well, all sorts of neo-nazis. you have yes there is, but neither in our country nor in other civilized countries are these nazis erected. and extreme nationalists of the nazi persuasion the enemy to the rank

of national heroes, that's the difference, and in ukraine they do just that, if the gentleman who was mentioned, god bless him, would understand. who is bandera shushkevich shushkevich there and so on, so to speak, neo-nazis who shot russians and jews poles and, er, german the occupiers are shifting this dirty work. basically on them they destroyed people there. now, if he proceeded from these considerations, he would understand where real nazism flourishes and where it is supported at the state level. we must give him the opportunity to look real in the eye and then listen, if she has even a shred of conscience, he must draw the right conclusions. uh, at the same time, the events that were then in ukraine

there, the volyn massacre, are also the tragedies of many families. now we too are facing tragedy. uh, at the beginning of march i stopped communicating with my friend who lives in kiev. he stopped communicating with me. sergeevich peskov told us in an interview that his wife had also cut off all ties with her childhood friends. here is how to deal with these tragedies, how to establish relations between ordinary people and ordinary ukrainians. you know in ukraine for a long time. uh, in fact, the power fell into the hands of these uh extreme nationalists and neo-nazis, and they just carry it out. total terror and many people they are simply afraid to even open their mouths and say what they think is actually still going on there. here we are sometimes critical of, uh, some of

our citizens, who, uh, perceive our actions to protect donbass in their own way. and there they are shot in the street, killed without trial or investigation. those who have a different opinion than those in power, who hold them there, are simply physically destroyed. there is a difference, we understand what is happening there or not, yes, we must understand, therefore i assure you there are a huge number of people in ukraine, who hate this regime. and, of course, we must rely on these people who understand what is happening and are ready to fight. with this. they just can’t be under the yoke of the nazi regime for some reason. uh, so, well, what can you do, but uh, i assure you there are many such people and we must maintain relations with them. we will do this and we are sure that the future of russian and

ukrainian relations is exactly that. uh, behind this part of ukrainian society, but then we must explain to them how we come there. values, we must explain with what we come there, with what values, what we carry. yes, they will explain to you. come to us and ask the ukrainians who live in the donbass what values ​​they protect. the motherland does not protect its identity, its history and its people. i am like a journalist. now i can't ask. uh, let's say corporate matters. uh, on the fifth day ivan safronov was sentenced for treason 22 years, this is the longest term under this article in recent years, for sure, and then take away the license new newspaper and manages for relatives of the laureate, in general, at the beginning of february, about thirty media outlets in russia closed or suspended their work, and many journalists went abroad to latvia, for example, and

now they work from there from latvia, in your opinion, is such an increase in pressure on the media justified and er, is this not a manifestation of that multipolar or unipolar world that we are talking about, you mentioned the nobel laureate. e peace, well he 's very happy that our citizen got the nobel peace prize, but in my opinion the nobel committee he is to a great extent. how did this dvuyuvat the significance of e, without the valuable significance of the nobel? prizes in this area of ​​humanitarian, well, you remember, i treat all my colleagues well, despite all the disagreements, let's say with our american partners. we had a business relationship with president obama for which he was given a nobel harm, but he never spoke about it, but you just force me to say it. what did he do in the field of peace protecting the world,

i mean, uh, the fighting in some regions of the world that was carried out when he was president. well, what are we talking about, now they gave our citizen. we know many such cases, when decisions are taken solely under the influence of the current politics of the tour. it does not do honor to those who make these decisions, but nonetheless. we will rejoice for those of our citizens who are now directly receiving this for those who have left and are working there with the territory. e other countries. i'm sure they're glad they can leave. they have always been here working against our country. well, now under the guise of what is what something threatens them here gladly moved there on the same salary that they received when they were here. yes, it's just that the current situation forces, uh, to determine their position for everyone who has some kind of position. well, here they are, they decided to go abroad to the nearest

centers of anti-russian work there. well , let them work. uh, our task is to explain to the vast majority of the citizens of the russian federation the position of the russian federation, the position of the russian leadership, our actions, which aimed at protecting the interests of the russian people and the multinational people of the russian federation as a whole. we act solely on the basis of these considerations. and we see that the vast majority of citizens are on our side, and 22 years is a very severe sentence for 122 years, then this is a journalist. he received this term, this sentence, as far as i understand, i don’t know the details there , only that he was not only a journalist. he was also an adviser. e the head of roskosmos, uh, and earned e not only by journalistic activities, but by collecting the appropriate

material and handed them over, at the disposal of one of the western intelligence services. uh, counterintelligence has been working on him for several years. uh, fixie- sat on the channels of his communication with those who paid him for this information closed secret information money fixed everything for later in the course of investigative actions. e arrested not only him, but also the means of communication that he used, the court counted. this is proven and accepted, the appropriate judgment, as far as it is fair in terms of e term, which he received for committed. i do not presume to judge here. here the attorney general has it, if he thinks it is uh, excessive too severe punishment, the prosecutor can always protest, uh lawyers. uh, the defendant convict can be submitted, the relevant documents, by a higher court. i will ask the last poll. and we will

finish and i still want to find the far east to finish. and last year you were also asked about your relationship with the far east, but now the situation has changed. here you are now rethought. eh, there is no attitude towards the far east and the people who live here, in this sense, nothing has changed. on the contrary, i believe that this is our chinese friend. dumb said so. she said that the far east is of great interest for russia and for russia's neighbors in the asian region. we are very glad that our positions coincide, our colleague from myanmar spoke about this and e. nikolayevich spoke about this and our colleague from mongolia, but the most important thing for us is that that the far east is along with the artic, the regions beyond which the future of russia is unquestionably

here are not only resources here. here, uh, the way out. e, c. e to the m-th region of the world, which is actively and at a very good pace, and we have begun to raise. uh, the far east, not because they were preparing some kind of special war operation. uh, in the donbass it was even a long time to live. this is a strategic choice, based on the development trend of the world economy and, accordingly, on the birth of new centers of power in the world, based on the fact that us hmm very good good friendship, high level of relationship. china has developed with our neighbors here in the region as a whole, and everything here is on the rise. so what do we need pages from this, on the contrary, we need to be in trend, we need to develop. here is everything that contributes to the development of

our contacts with this region of the world. we, er, so decided many years ago, he is very pleased that we made such a choice, and we are pleased with the result. they may be modest so far, but they exist, because the most important task here, as i said, is not allow up to the population, on the contrary, make this region. uh, uh, chair seat for citizens. e.i. look here for the first time in recent history. we are seeing a migration influx in the far east . this happened for the first time in 2021. there is even natural coal of the population here, but it is less than the national average. but this is the main aggregator of what is being done, and in principle, apparently, it is being done in the right direction. we still have a lot to do. we still have not done a lot, but we will definitely, like this way further, great to you. thank you. i want to thank all our guests. and

vladimir vladimirovich, you as the host, say the final word. well, i didn't uh prepare any final words. i just want to thank the audience. uh, carefully, uh, and i want to thank our friends who, uh, made it possible, despite the current affairs. uh, in their countries. went down to dedicate uh, time uh to a visit to russia uh, and. eh, definitely. i don't have it in it . without any doubts. we still have a bilateral meeting with some colleagues. i am already met, and some will see you. now we'll let you down. uh, let's outline the results of what has been done in bilateral relations lately . for the future, this will certainly benefit our bilateral relations and our cooperation. here, uh, the strategically important region of the far east for russia. thank you very much. everything is big. thank you, we're done with this. economic

forum, the central event of the current meeting, of course, lasted for about 3.5 hours, which in general is not surprising, of course. the main thing is speech of the russian president. but there are also foreign guests, representatives of four states at once, in person in the hall. here on the russian island , three more sent their video greetings on the way to a multipolar world. this is how the theme and the plenary session itself were formulated. and in general, the topic of the forum this year is obvious that modern times are changing, and those who do not want to understand this will face the harsh and cruel reality

, first of all, because they lose contact not only with it, but also with their own citizens. separation western elites, the interests of their own citizens are increasing, so the level of industrial development in europe, the quality of life of people, socio-economic stability, all this is thrown into the furnace of the sanctions furnace, they are spent at the behest of you from washington in the name of the notorious euro-atlantic unity, but in fact they are sacrificed for the sake of maintaining the dictatorship united states in world affairs. back in the spring, many foreign corporations raced to announce their withdrawal from russia, believing that it was our country will suffer from this more than others, but now we see how, one after another, manufacturing jobs are closed in europe itself and one of the key reasons. this, of course, is a break in business ties with

russia. the competitiveness of european enterprises is declining because the authorities themselves and the eu are actually depriving them of affordable raw materials , energy resources and sales markets. the situation is actually paradoxical, trying to keep their own and their dictates in essence, what he was talking about. today is the head of state. western countries act de facto to the detriment of their own citizens, hiding behind the interests of that very golden billion. in fact, it does a lot of damage to itself. in this situation, the reckless steps of the united states of britain and the european union, which are obsessed with illusory political ideas, have led, and the well-being of their own citizens, and even more so people outside the so-called golden billion. they generally push into the background, which will inevitably

lead western countries into a dead end of economic and social crisis, turn into unpredictable consequences for the whole world. russia sovereign states. we will always protect our national interests by pursuing our own policy and value the same qualities in partners who have been demonstrating for many years . reliability and responsibility are included in trade , investment and other cooperation, bearing in mind, of course, our colleagues and the countries of the asia-pacific region the absolute majority of the asia-pacific states do not accept the destructive logic of sanctions here in the center of business relations. there are principles of mutual the benefits of cooperation are the accumulation of the potentials of the economies for the benefit of the citizens of our countries, and this is the huge competitive advantage of the region as a guarantee of its dynamic long-term development, the pace of which for a long time has

consistently exceeded the general world. what is happening now in the world is, of course, including the battle for resources and western countries, which say that russia needs to be allegedly divided into several parts so that it cannot appropriate all its own wealth - this is in in general, in fact, a direct announcement of this very battle for resources, however. whatever the plans of western countries, the country of russia, as our president said today, is ready to fully provide for itself and, in fact, this is the only country in the world. well, or or one of the very many who can afford such a luxury. russia is perhaps the only country in the world that is able to fully provide itself with natural resources. and the far east plays a significant role here in oil and natural gas. coal metals, forest water

bioresources. for all these positions, the region is the most important supplier, both on the domestic and e- market, and for our foreign partners. we rely on prudent, economically smart, development of russia's natural resources on the basis of the most stringent environmental standards and the extracted raw materials. first of all, we will use for a deep redistribution within the country to strengthen the sovereignty of our country the provision of industrial safety to increase the income of citizens and the development of regions. we have already protected the mining sector, raw materials from hostile actions. now only a company in russian jurisdiction has the right to develop our natural resources. a prudent approach is, in general, probably. the key thing that is important to focus on now in the context of the sanctions imposed against russia cannot be

said to have any effect on the country's economy, despite the fact that the peak of all possible negative scenarios, as the russian president stressed today, has already passed , however, it is clear that immobilization is necessary of all available resources and the search for new ways, including transport routes in the conditions of a break in the logistics chains we are used to, of course, the northern sea route is also becoming one of the strategically significant projects for the country. it is also planned to further develop the matter not only in the passage of ships in the arctic , or simply connect where the end points are connected to each other so that in each port along the route, ship servicing and processing are carried out. and the traffic schedule was rhythmic and predictable reliable in this case, all points of

the route and all regions of the northern sea route will benefit from the operation of the logistics corridor, this is what we should strive for the government has already approved a plan for the development of the northern sea route until 2035, it is planned to allocate one and eight tenths of a trillion rubles from various sources for its implementation, according to the forecast the cargo traffic of this corridor can grow from the current 35 million tons to the target of 2220 million tons. of course, the key issue is the cargo base, both for transportation from the far east and to reverse direction. to do this, it is necessary to offer an economically justified competitive tariff, and i ask the governments to carefully work out these issues. in general, the president’s speech at the eastern economic forum this year was emphatically focused on the domestic market; it was about the development of the russian regions of the far

east, first of all, as a strategically significant current situation, but even if it was about foreign states, then only in connection with the opportunities russian topics the very opportunities that they are trying to limit and when, in fact, as the president emphasized more than once, it is impossible to limit. but where in this whole scheme, ukraine asked the moderators and i know that literally nothing was said about it in the opening speech of the president. well, the president reminded that ukraine is not part of the asia-pacific region, which is the main focus today. and, of course, he stressed that with the start of a special military operation. our side has lost nothing and will not lose. i am sure that we have not lost anything and will not lose anything in terms of acquisition, i can say that the main acquisition is the strengthening of

our sovereignty. and this is the inevitable result of what is happening now. yes, of course there is definitely polarization, but i think both in the world and within the country. i believe that this will only benefit, because everything that is harmful and everything that prevents us from moving forward is unnecessary. e will be rejected. we will gain momentum the pace of development. uh, because modern development can be basic only on sovereignty, all our steps in this direction, aimed at strengthening sovereignty, we have not started anything in terms of military operations, but are only trying to finish. uh, russia, after repeated attempts to resolve this issue peacefully, decided to respond in the same way. mirroring how our potential enemy acted by force of arms, we did it deliberately. uh, all our actions are aimed at

helping the people who live there in the donbass , this is our duty and we will fulfill it to the end. rejected using the words of the president obviously, it is worth considering a number of international agreements, primarily with western countries, which themselves hastened to violate these agreements, and not only did it, but continue to do so, especially when it comes to the so -called grain deal. let me remind you that the western countries talked a lot about the fact that in connection with the allegedly aggressive actions of russia, in connection with the conduct of a special military operation, a number of poor countries of the world. he may suffer , may actually face hunger, and in this connections urged russia to allow the withdrawal of ukrainian grain on ships through the black sea ports, which russia did only with bad luck, as it turned out that the exported grain to the same countries in africa, for example, which are really at risk

of facing hunger, does not end up at all in european markets. what we see is another brazen deception and it's not about us. this is a deception of the public international public deception. e hmm partners in africa in other countries that are in dire need of food. it's simple swindle boorish and arrogant attitude. uh, to those partners, for the sake of which all this is allegedly done. just cheated, you know? i spoke with uh, one of the leaders of the european state , about a month ago and mentioned that out of 21 ships, only two were sent to developing countries, but now there are already 80 ships. and the amount of e- food in the developing country is not increasing. but it's just not even know how to qualify it. this is, indeed, how the

colonialists were once so the name inside, and remained colonizers. they think, first of all, they do not care about their own skin. they want to hide behind interesting developing countries, but they do everything solely in their own interests. well , do western countries think and once again quote the president about their own skin when they continue to observe the shelling of the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant the iaea published a report on the results of a visit to the nuclear power plant in it, if roughly summarized, we are talking about the need to stop shelling to ensure safety strategically significant and potentially dangerous for the whole europe of the object, but at the same time, the experts did not say a word about who exactly was shelling the station. i absolutely trust this report. e, megate, a very responsible, international organization and leader is a very professional person. they are of course under pressure.

those countries where they work, including, uh, the united states of european countries, and cannot directly say that the shelling is coming from ukrainian territory. well, those are obvious things. we control stations. our soldiers are standing there. why are we shooting ourselves? what the fuck? just a dog in another way is impossible to say. they even tried to carry out e, terrorist active territory of the russian federation by undermining e lines of high-voltage e power transmission. e, close to our e-e nuclear power facilities. well, that is, they are purposefully working in this direction. uh, why uh what 's the point of creating threats for the whole of europe, i honestly don't really understand, but they do it. can europe not understand who exactly is shelling the zaporozhye nuclear power plant ? potentially, this very europe is threatened in this way, well, it’s unlikely that they can not know in europe that the grain that is exported from the black sea

ports goes exactly to the european market, and not at all to the population of poor countries, about which europe supposedly cares so much, of course europe is also well aware of this, but at the same time, the head of euro-diplomacy, borel, calls russia a quotation of a fascist state. this can hardly be considered a diplomatic formulation. and that's putting it mildly. if only he lived in his thirties in spain and would have heard in the weather report. the well-known sacramental phrase over all of spain cloudless skies as you know, it was a signal to start a coup d'état on the part of general franco, he would take up arms, and on whose side was the democratically elected government of spain of that time or foreigners, in my opinion, he would be on the side of the

putists, because today he supports just the same putschists on the territory of ukraine, the primary source of power of today's government state translation of 2014 he supports them, and then he would be on the side of the fascists for sure, that's who is on the side of the fascists. a barrel with the history of general franco well, in general, modern europe history prefers political expediency, and international law has long been its own conditional international rules written by themselves, which, if necessary, can be violated, if you act on your own, but let others follow these very rules no way. right now, many people are saying that russia is violating international right. and i think that this is absolutely not true in the course of the kosovo

crisis international court of justice. he made a decision, according to which if some part of the territory of a part of the country wants to declare its independence , this part is not obliged to ask permission from the central government of its country . this right we have declared our independence, and every other party has the right to know them, we have recognized, if we recognize them, we can conclude an international treaty with them, and friendship, cooperation, mutual assistance. of course, we have concluded that the treaty was ratified by the parliament of the russian federation and their parliaments. and there certain obligations lie on the russian side to provide them with assistance, including in the event of aggression in this case. crese from the kiev regime, which is essentially illegitimate, because it is based on a coup d'etat as the primary source of power. u today in ukraine but

continue the conversation of legitimacy, how legitimate are the accusations against russia, which, according to western countries, allegedly uses its energy resources, in particular gas, as a kind of weapon, allegedly to blackmail the whole continent, there is a lot of talk about this now, they write a lot. we all remember the calls to lower the temperature of our own homes in order to annoy the russian leader or to wash a little less often, and sometimes not to wash at all so that russia could in no way be stronger than ukraine, this sounds absurd above all, because it is europe by its own actions. in fact, it cuts itself off from energy resources. north stream. one is now practically closed, but everyone is talking. that means russia is being used. uh, so this weapon is energy nonsense, another one. and nonsense. what

weapons we use, we substitute as many as our partners need. how much, how much they put an application, how much we fulfill the contract for the maintenance of these units manufactured by simite, gazprom would have to conclude a system not from the siemens central office a with daughter in the uk that put gazprom under sanctions. and to repair these turbines, er, it means that we agreed in canada at the plant, sementsev, canada, what have we to do with it? canada took it, in the end , at the request of numerous germany, it gave it to germany. and under an agreement with the daughter of siemens great britain, turbines should be sent directly to st. petersburg. logistics has changed . changes must be made to the contract. the british daughter of sims does not even respond to requests from gazprom

to be photographed against the background of this turbine, but give the documents, in the end. it is curious that in this situation, when a number of our former western partners are no longer playing on the edge, even beyond the brink of a foul, moscow continues to strictly follow all signed contracts, however, if the former partners do not want to do this, but in this case the russian president has a proverb . supply contracts. and that some decisions of a political nature that contradict the contracts will be made, but we simply will not fulfill them. and we won't ship anything at all. if this is contrary to our interests, in this case economically, we will not supply gas, oil, coal, or experimental fuel oil, we will not represent anything, we will fully fulfill our contractual obligations. but if someone tries to impose something on us, then i want to note those who impose something on us are not in the position

today to dictate their will to us. let them change their minds, but in the economy this is the case everywhere , including in domestic economy. only one thing, as in the well-known russian fairy tale, to condemn a wolf's tail as dead. another good russian proverb is to shift from a sick head to a healthy one, this, apparently, is exactly what former partners are doing today . quite obviously, trying to shift the wine and somehow justify themselves to their own citizens of discontent, which in the current situation is obviously growing and will only be higher with the advent of winter and low temperatures. however, this, of course, is by no means blackmail from the outside. moscow black and white, as if the speeches at today's session were reversed, including the nobel peace prize and its laureates. so the prizes are, as the president noted, often very poly