we don’t have to buy, tv channels or newspapers or official media today one blogger or one, i don’t know, instagrammer, there one rock musician or one football player can have a much more informational impact than a huge tv channel somewhere in belgium and do it well, a lot. it seems to me more subtle, because in the world today there is a huge demand for the

support of these conservative initiatives. this bullet is practically empty today, because i am an international organization that before this positioned themselves as a christian democratic conservative triceratic even they left there, because the whole narrative of the whole mainstream is leading to the left in this liberal direction. and i think if we manage to close this activity on ourselves, if we shoot it in a new way, we don’t need the money that they allocate, so that you understand the scale. this means that in the year of its creation, he received $ 18 million in 2009. they had $150 million. last year and after covid such a heavy $300 million annual budget, which is directly allocated by the us congress, they do not earn money somewhere on the market, then it is spent on what the us congress wants directly - it finances, and therefore they record such results in all countries, according to to our perimeter, spending in fact a penny for the result that they get without military

incursions without arranging sangi is coups. simply by influencing political actors inside. they create such problems for us that we then for decades they are forced to disentangle them, but you are absolutely correct, but there are several nuances. first, why there is no color revolution in america because there is no embassy of the united states . they know very well what they are doing, they immediately take countermeasures, so any of our funds. they are here at the moment close the cruelest understood to talk. they're just wheels because they know what it really is. and they don't play games. well, because i have you ever seen the president of the united states of america that , let's say, he came to the parliament of the russian federation and made a speech and said that the idol

of capitalism was defeated. america then russia on the contrary, but here, if he came to attack. we are talking about this. we are the american president, well, just the voice of the american president had no illusions. i quoted boris nikolaevich yeltsin mmm, replacing communism with capitalism and rearranging it in places, because after this humiliation. when we talk about russia, the following will be those who talked once a few years ago by the president of azerbaijan, by the way, a graduate of your institute, as i understand it. and he said very wisely, he said here, when he came to power, there was one after one people's speech and, moreover, such gigantic crowds of 10,000 20 50 100 thousand, and then we closed foreign funding and a maximum of 500 people came out. here we are in russia when we finally woke up. and when stalin end acts tough, and who are you looking at

right away? and somehow everyone was drawn to their owners, because you very accurately said that this is cr2, and treat it like that. to them. vladimir vladimirovich must be exactly the same about a number of our supposedly journalists there. yes, today the fucker said that they were already working against russia, and now they happily left for their real owners. so it is here, therefore, when we are told. oh yes, we are talking about cats. yes, as you do not understand, this is not a government organization. existing on the money of the american government is not bad well , one of the branches, let's say, so the american government is not bad . they got on pretty well. guys are great. we started talking about the economy dmitry sorry, we accidentally climbed into your territory, only the economy is good. we accidentally climbed into your various territories, by the way, by the way, saying how

japan does on the islands. just expanding the space a little differently. and by the way , you know the southeastern countries are interesting, especially the market. this is the main part of consumers there now, it is, as it were, is incommensurable with any other region, so it can be done, in principle, as if hypothetically in the middle east directly. which is the same, but you just won't have enough market capacity. you have one rule there, china has now risen. here you have oil prices, as it were, down, then, then it recovers up and down, oil prices go up. that is, no matter how large-scale it is completely different , somewhere the same, no matter how commensurate volumes are, so the problem is that we have citizens who live there in peace. that's it part of the consumption is located there, that is, if earlier, how would they be converted through production. that is, now they do not increase their consumption through consumption, that is, the return of the state of the middle class in e. in china, this is a very large one. lord use. that is, each subsequent consumer appears precisely in southeast asia, one out of two one, or rather two out of three. that's why from this point of view, as if it were very basic, as if it were a

driver of growth, here are the relationships, there have always been enough. it may be noted. here they are, paradoxically we have until a certain time. there were very different directions of relations. we ordered, for example, accordingly, by the way , even the helicopter carriers tried the same thing in daewoo, respectively, in south korea we naturally had negotiating positions. until now, there are energy companies, for example, in the same japan that will play, they refused to use any ceilings there, because, as it were, this is the only way for them to get normal energy carriers. here are a number of other features. that is, we have always had a kind of multidirectionality, that is, how we interact with india with china despite the fact that they have a military conflict. now the current ones are in pakistan, as it were, in a frozen form, by the way, before certain military operations took place there. that's why, as if this region has always been important for us, accordingly, there is, in fact, a separate profile for the deputy prime minister. you are the remaining regional, by the way, saying, here, although before were. that's why he constantly lives there, by the way, and accordingly, they have a time difference there. therefore, it was originally set, as if there were very large components of time, they just said that the president rarely came, as if to forums only the eastern form, they went there only now, when, as it were, they already started in

full there. the presence here is considered to be the pf of st. petersburg - this is just the western territory, as it were, here and, accordingly, the eastern , here are the two main forums with us. well, right there there are all sorts of little things. there in russia it calls and all that. here, an interesting situation lies in the fact that, as it were, as far as this system is generally, in principle, unified. well, naturally, the most interesting thing arises. we are on the seventh of september. this one is somehow responsible for the future. here we all look at the seventh of september on september 7 in 2 days every other day, or rather, what will be correct, respectively, will be a minute of the seventh. oh sorry ahead. this is my kind of timings, in short, the ninth of september. that's friday, what will happen on friday us, respectively, will be directly with the emergency ministerial meeting. energy. they are all that the european commission has now rolled out will be weakly laminated. that is, they, of course, will formalize this in some kind of agreement, because you need to understand what is there, what happens first and the price of gas. and now we have dough, as if we all know very well that two main directions work. this is a turkish stream. it is, accordingly, the balkan stream, and now the

whole thing is flowing through ukraine. this is approximately accordingly, as we have already said, there are 80, there are 3 million barrels 8.3 million cubic meters per day, and so there it is the cheapest gas, in principle, most of the countries that receive it are not very happy with some restrictions from above. why because as a result they will lose these volumes that are now going on who opposes? the czech republic , by the way, only chairs ours with the european union, by the way, it is she who holds the council and she has convened an emergency meeting, respectively, and they are already opposed to accordingly, some of the channels were on top, and the ceilings why? because now negotiations with gazprom are leading to the restoration of gas supplies, if, accordingly, they break off again, and this is how, as a result, they will not even have options, how would, from where and what else to get this gas second hungary hungary calmly, it turns out in connection with billions sits on the balkan stream. why is there now to put some kind of limiter. that's because, as it were, she already has the cheapest energy source in terms of gas. here's the same

concerns all others germany opposes. france is in favor because in france, respectively, part of the nuclear component, it does not receive gas directly, and for germany the only way. then, somehow, to recover is to receive equally cheap energy sources, because there will be no cheap gas. therefore, germany is behind their backs, as if these partners are opposing this, and bloomberg and reuters are already wang, that is, the layouts there, as it were, are falling apart , about which this indicates that there is an element of populism terry the european commission is an organization that is not connected with countries and rolls out proposals that the economy really wants very much. why they don’t want to do lng separately there, so the restriction on st. petersburg is a great idea. here are the gas carriers that come from the usa, they, respectively, want to supply gas there via a well, russian gas was not made at 50 euros per megawatt per hour, but now at the current rate it is somewhere around 524.520, but one, but one dollar per 1,000 km . here they are, this is their ceiling that they want to put up, as it appears. so, accordingly, if the same ceilings are approximately for lng, gas will not go there at all now, the cost of lng is more than 2,000, the difference

between lng in the european union, and in the oasis is about $ 500, gas will not go there at such prices, which putin said today that the zelensky market has become a premium market. he, he, respectively, will pull the entire fleet there, respectively, as a result, there will be a problem with a deficit. it understands everything very well, but the european commission keeps throwing this idea in, you understand that no one will support it. nor norway more. putin said that they are stupid. this is an idea, he directly remembered how zadornov this is a populist idea, in fact, on the contrary, the economy rows a little. why because as a result you create a situation in which often, and you will be cut off really cheap gas here, and you will meet the winter in more difficult economic conditions from this point of view, the second very important point. this is actually a superstructure on electricity, firstly, respectively, also an idea that was not discussed with anyone at all, because the european union regulator came out. yes think head exactly. but in confidence for what will you have production after that? why is it that the problem is not that you have expensive electricity, the problem is that you have expensive raw materials from which it is produced? you also have

costs rising. at this point, instead of taking the cost of raw materials to limit the price at which the funds are in rice, you are, as it were, put on top of the settings. by the way, we went through all this with us that when we regulated, the prices were the same, that is, we delay these prices, and then, accordingly, inflation knocks out. just like a lid on top. why because all your costs have increased? when you calculated the gas carriers, you considered that the cost of renting tract plants has doubled. you generally learned this in the course, there you are 30%, at least 40%. and these are all costs, they will always grow in winter. it will be even more expensive and the same goes for electricity. let's deal with green energy accordingly, a great story to tell, you know what decision was made to limit electricity, to whom these restrictions are applied in non-gas generation, because gas generation suffer losses to renewable energy and coal. well, if there is a cheap renewal of electricity, why because it is expensive, it subsidizes it very strongly, due to this it becomes profitable and they often say solar winds, guys. you are, of course, dependent on gas. we are of course dependent on gas, and our whole

future is counting on you to someday appropriately take over and inherit this world, but no need to develop now. now , of course, please take away your profits. so instead of this, you are doing, no matter what, no matter how, don’t invest, and what kind of problems will arise in the economic component as a result, because you are creating such a superstructure from above. you thus de-motivate to the production of electricity in general and ask for a distant one. eh, as a question of the soviet era, is it good for us or not? well, let's say, they are sitting on a bench, two old jews are counting. this is true, but the main question is any transmission to us from this, whether it’s good or not for us, firstly, it will be important, what will happen on friday with a high degree of probability, there will be a split, because it will happen, not that it’s all the same. well, okay, before that. they are selling the meeting here, in fact, there will be the main ones for the sake of dismantling, and here is the most

interesting moment, how they will come out with this component. here's what will happen to the pg - it's generally incomprehensible that overhang pipeline gas is also not completely. it's clear, actually, because uh, there are a lot of contradictions on this issue, what is there it is not clear there, everything is clear. they, to be honest, they said that everything in metallurgy is black , by the way, now we will have non-ferrous charge. chemistry. that's it, now they were holding demonstrations, they say scholz, stop looking through the hole. let's better nord stream is now stopped 50% of all aluminum plants in the european union 50% of all zinc. well, what we said, in principle, it is happening. it just happens, as it were, more forced. but we'll say more there. here, it's just not leave, the fact of the matter is that everyone's reality may be different. but the economy of all, as it were. well, it is. and there is nothing. well, how would the salary than people. this is to the question that the european commission, as if ralph sent further escalation, but this seems to be clearly a very serious blow. it's like a very serious aggravate

situation on ben just in another suddenly something. and what will happen as a result, when everyone understands that how prices will rise in such under such schemes? that is, as if the basic what scenario, that is, cut off, as it were , deliveries to the ukrainian direction, by the way, and, accordingly, to the turkish direction. yes, they ask zelensky for no russian gas, so that nowhere is excellent. this leads to europe saying, well, thank you, first of all, we support you. and now we also take unemployment and transits. i remind you, therefore, from this point of view, how would it be such a hard scenario in general, because the volumes even through lng, if they are still bordering on lng supply, then this there will certainly be originality. it is an excellent option from the very beginning, it is clear why this is rushing, and even in these decisions of the european commission it is said how to deal with it. everything is very simple, but they offer a little consumption from the electric power industry by 10-15%. to reduce all consumption in front of everyone. well, macron also said this yesterday, well, that energy that you do not consume is an important part of this paragraph. they also want to agree

on peak consumption for another 5% separately. what is peak pip? power consumption or peak load peak the load falls in the morning and in the evening, respectively, this is approximately from 7:00 am to 10 am in our time. this is the same, respectively, from 17:00 to 21:00. accordingly, this is just the load. well, at night, it is considered, as it were, correspondingly low consumption, so the tariffs are different there, and so, what is the peculiarity, especially what is, and now imagine for a second. this is the base scenario. that is, it will actually be much worse if you are forced to citizens of the european union in the morning and in the evening to limit yourself to energy consumption will be lockdowns, that is, you will limit the consumption of people, and people go beyond the way of life. now, if they tell you in the morning that you won’t be able to work, the kettle itself is an energy-intensive appliance in the kitchen. here. and, by the way, the most not heating, it turns out microwave so to understand. that's why. from the point of view, as it were, this important, energy-intensive component turns out to be a bathroom hair dryer. that's why i said in the kitchen. here, therefore, as it were, uh, because fen-wans lead, then to such expenses, a funeral. this is if the water

which does not fall, in short, in the sense is the following, well, is that this is a very serious load. and all this is visible, that is, an objective reality. it can be easily seen, we take sociology, we take rating data, if there was aggregation, if there was a complete mobilization around the leaders, they had ratings, they would have been different, respectively, they would now be high average ideal media ratings. despite the fact that there are also parliamentary republics, we treat all presidential france stand. everyone has. they, respectively, have a solidarity drop of more than 30%, that is, this means that the economy does not work, they begin to choose an honest boss for themselves. to be honest, all problems will be solved, as if at first it will be necessary to chip in for transit, because approximately the cost of transit per year is, respectively, from 3 billion. and that this universal one will not go for less? the question is different. it will be necessary to search somewhere else from above for these 3 days. well, why? well, zelensky is much cheaper, but the cost of pumping a gas pipeline will be pumped who needs. he will carefully explain to the european union how they should continue to live. you just need to understand that here

in a t-shirt to go to save money on costumes to carry stupidity. you just have to understand, some people do n't fully understand yet. so far, the north counter is disabled with germany, respectively, it is connected, as if it were a blow, as if serious. and when the bounty is turned off - this is a means, a hub that is located in austria yes, it controls very much with it, italy is next, as it were, for titanium, therefore, from this point of view, it would be central if it is the direction, as it were, will be beaten, this will be serious gas, therefore, from this point of view, of course , the most interesting events. here are five of course. well, we don't have a program on friday. so we'll find out on sunday. what will end friday advertising. get ready for the heart of the form of

what is happening now in the east of vladivostok , because, in principle, this is the idea that the pacific ocean will be the mediterranean at the beginning of the 20th- 21st century. this idea roamed the americans at the end of the nineteenth century john hay, as secretary of state, put forward this term and the united states actively developed this space. naturally, the fact that this development concerned, sometimes military. here are two hot wars. they are korea korea vietnam and the fact that since the eighties any american administration, including, by the way, ronald, has been talking about what exactly the pacific ocean is. uh, using the oceanic principle of building a geopolitical for the united states , the main thing will unfold e, well, it will be the center of gravity of the world economy in the 21st century in the 20th century at the end of the 20th-20th century, she spoke about this

hillary clinton was set up for this by the bush administration and the fact that now russia has turned there, and in this i see, in this, i see the full merit of our president. i am not treating vladimir vladimirovich putin here because he is among our leadership. i'm so roughly rough estimates. we have always had a percentage of 20 people who spoke about the asian direction, that is, the eastern direction and 80% in all ministries, all the business of those who believed that russia is a european country and the main thing is for us to build these relations with europe european union in the nineties we simply wanted to be part of europe, i mean part of organized europe, part of the european union we would join nato, if, of course, we were called there and stalin asked for a different purpose. he perfectly understood when i would enter there. i justify it all. eat from the inside eat from the inside. no, no, uh, from the inside you are now, for example, denying

the european ambassador. you invite him there, he put it in that place, and we ask him about the european european union, he gets scared, but i don’t i know invite, and the european went, but come to us for the transfer. tomorrow, here it is, you will find out, being on the side of staying, you speak the language. on friday, he was invited to a friday night shibatz. here, so that he explains the position of the european union . i don’t think that the european union, i disagree with dima here, that this is a victim, here’s the last ba. they will have to go to the bottom with an unfurled flag, which, in fact, they actually do. well, as a victim, you know? they're there that's heroically i don't know, i don't know how it is a hell of a bun americans, because the sweet deal of the united states had a concept about the european union in general of

the european communities. they then recognized them as an enemy by the european communities themselves precisely in economic terms, without emphasizing the military component of europe from this. but as for the european communities, before the european sauce. union they were called the european economic community. tolls drove offended yes, yes, what did he want to do there, the war began and so now there is a systematic destruction of the european union of the european union when they should be disintegrated - either the european union will be weakened or integrated, and the barrel, you know what he answered putin began to cackle, - he says, i say anti-fascist here, but he himself is afraid. he sent peter to the camp, firstly, the barelnik qualified the russian regime as a fascist, we enter into a parliamentary exchange of views, on monday a member of the question he referred to a statement made, moreover, by the speaker. first they sent us a printout of the

transcript. you came, you didn’t send, it was important that life is a statement of social activity, and the entire track record of the barrel if this house of night he is aloof, he has always opposed the franco regimes, participated in the anti-franco struggle and the defense of democracy and human rights. he was a member of the socialist party and was actively involved in spain's transition to a franck dictatorship and democracy, any statements of which claims to the contrary categorically. so you betrayed your past? ladies how is it? you are a barrel, oh, there is no borelvar, and all the baryls. we love the barrel of oil, this one is not for us i like the forty-seventh year of birth, that the year 36

already happened normally under the frank regime, and frank is still with us. well, i won't go into details about the italoiberian form of fascism, yes, but we defeated nazism. stop talking about fascism. how can you, you forgot the history of the frank family remembered by the jews who converted to christianity. uh-huh yes, you call them crows. so there is no type. in general, i’m zelensky, for example, you can’t talk about christening uprooting. in his section, in general, i just wanted to say that this is our movement here is our current leadership of the president. after all , he really insisted on the construction of eastern siberia, the pacific ocean in 2003-2005, then, er, the force of siberia is interesting. now, if we

had launched it then in december of the nineteenth year, after all. yes, to go further, well, in other words, they constantly emphasize this eastern policy, the development of siberia, a distant temple of movement to the east. still, it will lead to what we will consider equal in rights, like russia really being, uh, a participant in those processes, because when we talk about how russia is viewed in the pacific. here from the same southeast asia southeast asia this is a strange osian. here is vasian us. so they consider yes an important partner, but on the other hand they say that well, as a matter of fact, here is the intensity of your connection. what is with us, including, by the way, not only economic political. well, it’s right here, in principle, ours is this one, well, really speaking, may 5, yes lately. yes? no, we just now she stopped now. yes she found, at least when we are now playing for

balance. china has china what is the economic forum boau. they also hold an economic forum, so to speak, unite the region. we have our own, if we have, but one belt one way chinese project for the consolidation of the eurasian space, the great eurasian partnership, which putin put forward in the sixteenth year. yes, it needs to be filled with content, but by itself this idea exists, so in order to resist the west, and here there are two ways one way defensive it must be created. it is different to attack one's own space - this is to impose sanctions. and they must be done both. i don't like it. the fact is that it is necessary to strengthen both the defense and carry out the offensive, because i, frankly, it turns out then why? well, well, if you drop it for some reason, well, we are building our own space. this strengthens our our our position. that's really someone counted. how many

people should live there. but it's just yes, because what is the cost of living for a person on this territory gave that there should be about 500 million. well, this is generally a russian empire from 20 million. that is, in fact, therefore, the euroses , really, then here are all our arrays, as shown on the map. that's what it is beyond the arctic circle for permanent life. not particularly suitable. well, it’s 200 km from the trans-siberian railway to the south in 2007, i understand something further, but here what is the problem about, that is, today putin spoke about aviation, yes, an increase in the number. yes, that is, if you look, then the diversity of people and the need, then solve economic problems. well, this is a service, but very expensive. therefore , it is not

by chance that the migration program needs to be protected here, there was a cosmodrome with it, respectively, a scientific town, and aviation enterprises appeared. that is, you need to look at it, so that there are such keys that yes, there is, and what about him, because there are a large number of shortcomings. that is, you remember the seventies, the creation of these huge e, somehow industrial it's m-m techs, but fuel complexes right? yes, yes, yes and where did it go because of the people implementing the program despite the fact that despite the fact that we had oil dollars flowing, yes, and the eastern part of our new birthplaces. i agree with the speed at which trains run in china and, say, in japan. at what speed trains run in russia, there are nuances about themselves, there are continuous traffic jams near the caribbean, they

cost a train, that there is also to build a high-speed highway, when we even have lens permafrost on this.