do not in the lens of your permafrost. deal in is, that disperse deal the that until morning his lack of. now serious money is needed to expand or construct a bam and double-track. yes? bam will. we would like the trans-siberian railway to be expanded several times there, in fact, a corrupt component, which we now have, of course, with efforts, a serious advantage in the supply of our goods. so, by the way, the ministry of defense is also being partially built, including, there is a separate branch from the operational component , but it doesn’t matter how much it will go, let’s say cargo, for example, a chinese, if you have a red one with us, respectively, there due to loading for everything else, as it were, a fall of less than sixty is considered a component problem, and china is just an echelon. here we have the red highway, which we are now planning, for example, suppose, even if, accordingly, proof, even if they are further here in tyumen, that’s the direction there, as it were, it’s even a low

-speed expressway, in fact, such what i’m talking about. well, china japan is shown by trains that come from speeds. there in search they have no to us. parnyak need to drive a janitor - this is different. the theme, of course, goods at great speed. there, too, you can do speed. it’s just that our problem is that we have very serious narrow parts there, which generally reset to zero, as if the entire eastern training ground. and i will say so no, such tasks that cannot be solved by big ones. i just would have been a problem posed for at least the last 20 years. russia has taken notice. on this one these regions are up to it. on my sight. that's after the seventies. they don't seem to me that brezhnev's program was successful; in fact, these regions were abandoned. in addition, when you just spoke about sovereignty, yes, sovereignty implies very much by me. no, there is no ideal sovereignty, that is, there is no complete sovereignty, not a single country, because when you join an international international organization, that is, you impose on

yourself, certain right rules now, when our president speaks about law, by the way, now the americans have remembered about the right, they now began to often say to use the word right in relation to, for example, who we didn’t rule the same ukraine as the frame, because for them this is the right, referring to just the forty-fifth year for some reason necessary for them. now the rule is to interfere a little bit with the word equal to zero, so that in here they give a lot of attention to rhetoric, for example, because the rules of the rules this means american law. we are generally clean here the very concept of sovereignty has one side with a completely sovereign. it is great britain there sovereign is the queen not well, we have in the spanish treaty. well, yes, the sovereign can determine, uh, the religion of his potters of these prime ministers is unlimited in power by popular

sovereignty. and what's more, yes, i'm the president here, of course, always right, but in the modern world. the principle of sovereign equality of the state, i think this is already this must be abandoned. but i still can’t, therefore, when he said that there couldn’t be in the world, the power of the hegemot, of course, it can’t be, if it’s not russia, but he said it well, he went in, they said. well, look how long is the search. let's say moscow-simferopol. how long does the train take, moscow 28 hours? well, is that okay? i ask, no, what century do we live in, but now there is a big problem, too. the question is different. in general, the speed of trains in our country is not the same if it went 350 km / h, 400, km / h. everything is a completely different development of everything in the country. he walks for 3 hours across the crimea, he rises to dzhankoy and is transported from dzhankoy. you

again do not hear me. we are now talking about other. you didn't hear me again, that those railways , like the railway that exists, do not allow maximum speed, that's all much. well, we clearly understand that we will probably have problems with airplanes for a period of time. so it takes a certain time to replace all the steam, really ground, what we are doing, yes, there we have excellent roads that were previously impossible to conceive at high speed. there is some movement not across the country. uh huh , but there is. but now we have to think what to do the railroads left a lot, and everyone immediately had a tragedy. oh, siemens left, well, you have to look, it means that they are either collecting their kulibins to the chinese, yes, to modernize the railway or develop highways, that is, to cross like the americans or or this and that there the return cargo is being translated. in general, everything is different, only the

glands of another, of course, fertilizer is only for a piece of iron. naturally, the fact that you drag it, uh, funny men with beards is the way, by the way, also speaking as if it were a discussion. why do we need to modernize the trans-siberian railway if we all have carrots to deal with all the infrastructure, it is necessary to deal with the challenge of the 21st century, because if a person can sit down there in relatively speaking in moscow and after 5 hours go out quietly in simferopol he has one feeling from life. and if he has to think about wasting time, there is a different feeling, simferopol also needs the same train as in uh, petersburg, you understand the high-speed one, that siemens was there to launch a high-speed train to simferopol, for this, even in soviet times, high-speed traffic was made on the site, who does not know, moscow kursk

belgorod kharkiv zaporizhzhia and crimea therefore everything has its time. it's true. there are other techniques of conor in a different way, it is necessary to lay in a different way, railway ones. the canvas needs to look at the joints differently, that is, there are a million nuances. this is a completely different approach. this is technological to china to japan what i'm talking about, look at the chinese details. you can give examples saying that there are pioneers in this, of course, there are some japans that are much better. here's where to go. here's what to do, and we're all there. alexander and we are still waiting, when the plane hits the planes, it is also necessary to develop. that's how the germans will come to us. and what do we tell them german. let's get on the train in moscow and soon we'll be the german republic and soon we'll show you the crimea i want to enchant him right away. if you think that the german railway works , you understand perfectly well, that's why the premier didn't bring it up. ah, i'll start, perhaps with a barrel. well

, the indignation of the barrel is in a certain sense in a certain sense on par with the fascist, or rather, he declared at the beginning, and then these claims were pressed against him and hmm, such a misunderstanding arises, what is happening? that's why here i fought, i fought, i performed. i visit the jewish cemetery in berlin several times a year. well, it so happened that i also have close people there. i am one of the oldest cemeteries. as a matter of fact, in berlin is the oldest cemetery, which turned out to be undestroyed during the time of hitler's administration. there are some graves there for 200 years already, and it’s interesting when you go and look, there are these graves, and it’s written there. this one was a doctor, this one served, because a lot of people who do not know jewish citizens served in the first world war, in germany and served quite well. very

good. and here you often meet germans there who come to these cemeteries. well, i know there are people who just love to go to cemeteries. well, very often i see some german groups there, individual people or groups. they go from grave to grave. and i hear what they are about they speak and understand what they are, what they talk about talking with them. rest almost always in one. well , how did it happen? well, we, probably, we have nothing to do with this, we, then, well, we came and looked. here, look, here are the graves they have, the hitlers did not destroy these graves. nothing happened. and so, when i look at the barrel, and when i listen to all the speeches of today that we hear in the direction of russia, including russia, here is russia - this is a totalitarian state. there are almost fascists and so on and so forth, but i want you to ask here. what do you think, that the real

nazis? these are those who walked in the ss uniform, wore badges and their shoulder straps there. do you think that the nazis - these are only those whom we saw on tv screens and watched standing. they stood there with whips and shampoos somewhere in concentration camps, but like millions of those germans who lived in the same berlin and who were respectable citizens. they lived with their families. there were great family relationships. they took their children to schools. they went to geshefts, which then they took them away from the jews, who took them there, some others lived in their bourgeois world, i will try any of these germans. name and say that he is a fascist, and then it was like that too, they didn’t know what they were, they didn’t know what happened to the crown and knew that there was a maidan, they didn’t know what kind of aksens hausen was, which is actually located at the gate berlin is nowhere far to go. no need to take a car there. there i

don't know on foot. you can get there. here it is, this concentration camp, which was actually located in berlin, and no one did anything knew, and then, when this genocification began, which i have already said many times. and we say that they denocified eleven and a half, there were millions of members of the nsdp, the app genocified one and a half million members of the nsdp. yes, and the population was genocified, which themselves were bourgeois, who considered themselves respectable, whose ancestors now go to this jewish cemetery and they go there and say, well, it’s kind of, well, well, well, it’s uncomfortable, but we have nothing to do with this. we did not know anything about it, and today we are asking questions and i ask these questions. er, indeed. what's going on? why has all this changed? why now those people who, in principle, have kept in themselves hmm well, probably there is this kind of ancestral memory. probably if the historical memory, they

kept it in themselves, they did not go through any genocification. yes, in west germany they explained what it is, indeed, political training was delivered very well. they told, they explained it all, they did it all, and in forty-five year, when the war had just ended and hmm , the americans, they say, took some residents , brought them to concentration camps, showed them there what they had done there and, of course, it was a good one. such an inoculation. i don't know how it was in the soviet zone. i know something else, that in the forty-fifth year, the americans came up with plans for aerodynamics. i already talked about him. this is a plan to save the fighters. and he is upa. it was a plan that was actually given to stepan banderi and for many years until the early eighties this plan existed. this plan. they practically accepted on their territory. i mean, germany accepted on its territory almost all those fighters of the brothers

who still managed to escape from or from the territory of the then soviet union, or they just at that time were already there somewhere they were overseen by police overseers. they turned out to be practically all in germany germany was set up by the prologue publishing house in munich, i want to remind you, which was the main center of the anti as they said anti bolshevik anti-communist struggle. it worked there stepan bandera under the name stefan popper. it was there that he worked, and there he received, being an employee of this publishing house, he received an official visa to the united states of america. and as employees of the publishing house, although i showed these documents, there are american documents. there clearly write in these documents. these are deciphered open documents, they write to the cia that stepan bandera belonged to an ultra-racial terrorist organization. he received a visa, not under his own name, this is all happening. and who stood at these origins. at the origins was lev dobryansky this american of ukrainian origin, who at

one time. e, thought out and thought up. as a matter of fact, this operation of the aerodynamicist to save bandera and up to the eighties was drawn by this program, and his daughter paula dobryanskaya for many years was engaged in anti-russian programs with a view to a number of e, german american secretaries of state. it was they who thought through these anti-russians, not anti-russians, but precisely anti. in the program, all this went on under this. where was it? it was in germany well, of course, canada understandably, of course. uh, united states of america. well, in germany, that was why you're asking me a question today. here we often argue ask a question. and how did the germans get away with it somewhere? it didn't go anywhere. it has always been on this territory and that you have not made any claims to me now, my german colleagues, so that they do not tell me. i understand this very well, i know that people had it, there is still this memory, about which i spoke, we are not to blame. and now you can also

blame russia. now you can part of the blame yourself take it off by saying, but now the hitlers stalin is now, in principle, the same thing with us, so part of the blame can be more terrible to say, but what choice did the germans have? you can see how russian they are. well, yes, yes, if the russian issues were finally resolved then, there would be no problems now. well, this is how they prepare the ground for this volodya this is one part. well, the second part, i will finish today. debates in the bundestag, it's just an amazing thing. ah, the chancellor, uh, that and my favorite german chancellor olaf schultz speaking today we discussed today the budget and scotch tape. you can show show there a piece, he speaks at the end using the english wording of the chants, and the fans of the company will cope with the time the worksheet will be saved. you will never be alone, he says it alone in english. in principle, this is the

chant of the fans, liverpool but the question is simple the question is, when the german chancellor speaks in the bundestag, on the most difficult issue today, when he talks and says that there will be no bill, that there will be problems, we will fight this. he is the last sentence of his speech. i took this from him from his instagram, he speaks in english. i am asking this question. it is he who addresses the german people or his boss across the ocean. it was better, it was clear, and so that he understood what he was talking about, and how he was talking, he was a liverpool fan, which is even worse, given the brilliant history of german football, chancellor, fan, liverpool in general. well, this is for me. it's just this, this admission of defeat. well, two more people by, which i can not pass robert hubback. uh, i'm doing a political show yesterday, one of the biggest political shows. he just sat down in a puddle asking him questions, the presenter asks him a question and says, well,

okay. well, we know that a wave of bankruptcies awaits us. that's all small business now. e hmm let's show, and there is this piece. well, overall it's great. it will be a harsh winter. this in the description will be politically difficult, of course there will be coercion, at least price coercion for the german population of solvency business, upon completion of this land. no, i don't think so, i believe that some ce will temporarily stop production first, they will go bankrupt. here, as always the subtleties of translation, in fact, everything sounded even worse when he was told insolvency. i was told about bankruptcy and he said no they will not go bankrupt. they will stop production. she says, wait. doesn't stopping production mean automatic bankruptcy? he says, no, of course, they will stop production, and then someday they can start it again. to produce it. and it says it. well, he says,

of course, the author of actually children's books will approach this differently. this is the author of children's books. he, of course, showed himself to be such a powerful head of the economic department. well, as biden practitioner, yes, well, practically. oh, and the last dognation ended and will not be finished, i won’t say the most lena ber god , i won’t spend much time on it, but i’ll read it. how did she begin her speech in the bundestag, dedicated to. e matter, a lived with me. i wish, of course, but in this case, it's still not. e, not not 100%, an accurate translation, but still, no matter how difficult and terrible the last 6 months have been. we can be proud and grateful not only for defending the people of ukraine and our world order, but also for how our country and, above all, people in this country defended it, stood up together and without any, but

if they showed solidarity by those who were forced to flee ukraine. she is giving a speech about the budget for the next year, germany, that is, a speech, she will continue to be there, that is, through every phrase ukraine is coming ukraine ukraine of course, this is not the first migratory wave. yes, this, right, by the way, is a question for the rest of the migrants. they were also treated in germany as ukrainians, they were given the same social assistance, they were also treated with them as well, or germany finally showed its true aryan, russian face and syrians, afghans, kurds, iraqis, africans are still somewhat different conditions and a slightly different attitude. well, look, when it comes to ukraine, the aggressor is here, russia, therefore, of course, germany must now step up and

help everyone. and when they arrived, there were two and a half million or about two million refugees from africa from the middle east, central asia well, it's like, they just fled from hunger. it’s not nato and the united states of america that bombed, smashed and destroyed anyway, but they did n’t give anything, but still people. well, no, everything, if other people, yes, there are people, but there are people. but ukraine of the same is practically yes, practically yes, so much so that today's today's discussion in the bundestag. for me. this is, in principle, a complete defeat of the german government, which a failed to show its attitude to how they will work for their own people b, that for them the issue of ukraine is still the most important in their financial component. and, of course, the third thing is that they, in general, all three showed their full professionalism, so the

government understands the region the region reacts the daughter reacts, i ask, i’m free and it’s nice to have a poll of a public genius in germany alexander correct me if i'm wrong khabib is in the lead ahead of schultz. well, yes, they're all so into it . but i'd like to start with another loop of our discussion of three word maxims or three paradigms. this is justice sovereignty and brain death. and today we talked a lot about sovereignty and justice, and the very correct comrade general said that where we entered this wto, but at the same time, the most important and most terrible wto that almost happened to us did not happen. here's a little more and we would have been already we would have been kaput, because there

the most important component this is the third part. this is the first bastard gats there, the second trade with services, and the third with such a very bad one. uh, the name is thrips. e with international copyright agreement. it would seem that. well, what is copyright, and according to it. we were obliged to let them in on equal terms with the russian media to media bank. now imagine that not only is not a government organization from e. development fund. a bunch of different media that are leading well, we 'll see now, please, british american french german official media objectively reality. yes, we are glad to subscribe and we beat them, as if a scythe of protocols of behavior nearby and have no right to open here normally. this representation was a transitional period. the provision is never possible in

the fact that in the face of close competition we take them out in one gate, so they work here, and we have a bath there further justice. but there are two concepts, for example, uh, mechanical and organic creative and uh, formal here are the lychees from western liberal democracies, which, in my opinion glance represent such a formal procedure. well, a man came without reading the programs, there's the cdu, the spd, well, i'm sorry, i'll prop. more germany because the topic is closer. uh, what's the difference voted here beerbock there on a soap bubble blew cooler than schol, respectively , voted for her. but justice here, uh, in it, uh, it is based on deeper motives. what is a sense of justice is it in fact? well, speaking in simple children's language. what is good? what is bad? here you feel that human? true, after all, uh, what is the strength of the enemy danila bagrov is strength in pravda a and therefore here the american says that strength in money is who is right, respectively, and here we see a conflict of these two

principles. eh, i would say, not even just philosophical, but ideological formal law, some formal approaches, or depths, fair foundations of coexistence, starting perfectly from that level and ending between civilizational and, in fact, a turn to the east. e our state transition to civilizational branch pipe between cultural communication with ours. partners with friendly countries this is evidence that we have moved away from this formal mechanical procedure to sickness. such a creative approach to the development of a truly truly multipolar and just world is another question. how can we further promote this agenda, and indeed, it was very correctly said in e hmm attempts. uh, carrying out and various color revolutions and destabilization and, in fact, subjugation mass consciousness through various non-governmental organizations, and then a

multi-vector development strategy, as i would call it, that is, in essence. well, what unites the ford carnegie endowment fund for democracy development international monetary fund is also the wto a common single point of application of vectors to maximize the promotion of interests and well-being. uh, the state that is represented is actually represented by these structures. well, this is a purely anglo-saxon system of law, this is the united states, in fact, the americans, creating this organization in the forty-seventh year. they they created the rules of the game for themselves to suit their realities, economically, politically, and so on, respectively. well, the same fountainege, a huge bunch of various wrong organizations, what can we oppose to this? really. we can create there, uh, the russian world two there, the growth of cooperation is three zero in germany in spain in france, well, they will immediately, of course, be strangled economically and ideologically.

let's translate from clerical, but understandable, everything is not so scary if there is an instruction. the number of sanctions that were against russia for how long it will even be impossible to read them in a few days on the payment infrastructure inside russia in the ninety-eighth year. we, as a country, had both a default and a devaluation of the ruble many times against these risks, and a background of national welfare has been created. what he created over the past decades, after all, these are very strong macroeconomic systems for 100 years will be the question is always the definition of such budget money, you can solve this or that task, the role

of the ministry of finance in this, of course, is the main one. at one time there was an organization of the comintern and by the way, based. she is not in berlin, washington, moscow, and worked quite successfully. maybe indeed create a comintern of traditionalists comintern there european conservatives, and even the best. i do not want to offend, but let's still remember the story. that is, that what the comintern in the traditionalists was very difficult to call rather exactly the opposite of any of the comments, at least extremely far from political feminism. if you want, but really forge the structures of those forces in europe who really have not yet lost their e.