macroeconomic now and in 100 years will be

the question is always the definition of such budget money, you can solve this or that task, the role of the ministry of finance in this, of course, is the main one . that is, in this case, i'm not talking about the donbass donbass even so even so. well,

but it's so pure like that. here is a digression. it's just that when semyon arkadyevich began to tell where what we can do, i suddenly remembered that once there was a purely human factor. he was also really here is north korea well, really, why not, if people are ready, if they can, then you really need to use it? well, vitaly comrade caught up with me with a steinmar. i saw steinmeier a little different many years ago, when he was foreign minister for the first time, there is a cafe in berlin called einstein. i already, in my opinion, told about it. they come there in the mornings , ministers come there, deputies have breakfast well, knowledgeable people also know where you can meet someone. here once. i was sitting there with a man with whom we spoke loudly about russia, and steinmeier was sitting across the table, then he was a minister along with his secretary. well, i saw that he was listening attentively to what we were talking about at some point, when they were leaving, he leaned towards us. and he knew that we were journalists. well, that is,

there was some there, and he naturally speaks german, well, we will never have any problems with russia. and we talked about russia with russia, we will always live well. this was. well , probably, i don’t remember, it’s already 2009, when he the first time i just went around to all these to all these positions, and now such changes are taking place. here is vitaly comrade, he speaks absolutely correctly. he says, and steinmeier cheated on himself steinmeier. in the end, he apologized for cheating on his patron. i would like to remind you that steinmeier began his political career as gerhard schröder's chief of staff in lower saxony. for many years he headed his small office, the little council of people's commissars, and worked with him a lot steinmeier was his right hand, which with schroeder developed all the plans when he was still minister-president of lower saxony. he developed his plans, including the development of relations with russia. in 2007, i met schroeder and did a big interview with him, which was then attended by stein. and schroder then

said that we know that russia is our future. he didn’t even have adopted children from russia then, then they appeared. who doesn't know, i mean, he has two adopted children from russia, he doesn't just say that he loves russia this is a person who really understands what it is, and here is steinmeier steinmeier a man who betrayed his patron, because he is not only against him, he actually participates in the very coalition that opposes schroeder because he supports russia a scholz. who is this? this is also one of those close people, e.g. shredders, with whom he was in his time. this is the group that came up with the ideas for nord stream. and now all that has changed, and that's it. this has changed not in favor, but of schultz and not in in favor of steinmar, but in favor of the fact that they actually abandoned what they lived with and came to a completely new kind of life. and when i look at it, i look at it. here is today's elite political germany. you understand that the

first thing we should talk about today is the topic of betrayal, that is, the topic of betraying our own ideals when they start talking about something. well, in particular, let's say when they talk about russia as a country e dictatorial from a totalitarian state, then i understand that this for them, it is possible to create an alibi for themselves because it was they who betrayed their ideals in the first place and are leading the country, in particular germany, to a totalitarian state. it's an opportunity for them when they say it and when they throw accusations like this at russia it's not because they think that about russia about russia because it's a great way for them to create an alibi for themselves i mean accusing them therefore, i relieve myself a little of the guilt in which i really have. but today the main message is this. here is dima, what is what dima said, i can only join this to the main message, not just

destruction. well, the message of today's this war. e with russia is the destruction of history. this is, first of all, the destruction of the history of russia, the history of russia needs to be destroyed, and when the history of russia is destroyed, then we can talk about everything else, and the destruction of russia, uh, remember, i already once gave an example for the united states. history is several hundred years for russia . millennium, so the united states is certainly trying. now all the latest history fit in these 200 years. having removed those years of development of the formation of the russian state and the russian empire in general, in place of all this, here are today's years, when the united states developed and became what it has become, and therefore today's attempts to change all this in the first place. history is just an attempt to humiliate russia , to show to remove all those years that were the development and achievements of russia, to show that russia had something. and what? generally fits in

a very short period of time, and so they are trying to here are the most important points in the history of recent in the recent history of russia, they are trying to make nothing out of them. i mean, of course, the victory of the great patriotic war and the second world war, removing this from russia can turn russia into a pariah country, that they are trying to make this decision of the european parliament. these are the words, including those of scholz, who, when he congratulates ukraine on independence day, speaks about the country about the country about the countries. uh, nazi countries. well he's true, i said no nazi in a different way. well, then he equated hitler and stalin, and all these attempts today are in fact an absolutely clear -cut ideological war, with the goal of destroying the image of another country, that is, another. mm, another dominion. here is a wimer, he chooses this expression. he says we are now present in two to millions, one to a million is with us. the united states of america with new

values ​​and again a history in which they are trying to fit everything that they have created that's new, and the other is russia, china, several other countries with different histories and other time periods. and here it is today. it seems to me that it is very important to understand, and from this point of view. we can really understand and appreciate what they are pursuing their main goals. this is the destruction of history. this is dehumanization. uh, russia well, and china by the way, including this, uh, the presentation of russians as people who do not honor agreements. i mean, now the last claims. it's like country killer in the end as a terrorist country. and why do they need it? because against this background they can very easily assert themselves as the creators of modern history. then everything else can be turned into dust. here are their main goals, they still have one more argument. i liked the proposal today by the head of the central bank, elvira nabiullina, but

they are 300 billion of us. well, actually, we can see that there are various ones in zero units, but in pieces of iron. yes, we can look at this amount and just get a symmetrical answer for this amount. well, it's high time, but it's very when you hear this head of the central bank, you understand that this option is already being deeply studied and read. the main thing from her would not be expected. so that's the trouble, that now many people say the exact opposite of what they said before, it's better to let vital change in this direction. much has been said today, very correctly, about a long-term war of attrition, and which the west is trying to impose on russia and this is largely connected with this, only now money is being allocated to ukraine yes, we are talking about this was already touched upon a little today as part of the conversation about the fact that 2 billion, we hear 3 billion grants, they are already being allocated more than once. she is there for a year and a half to two ahead. but i think

that here, of course there is another deep. hidden. the reason for it is related to some excitement about what will happen in the medium term, so this money needs to be allocated right now for the long term, because further problems may begin in various areas of the military sphere, including us, i think today, a certain part of the audience was not so frightened a little when they compared, well, such a total collective military budget of nato countries there is a trillion trillion with kopecks of dollars. and here is the russian military budget. well, it seems to me, it still seems to me that this is not so, so there is no need to compare, because yes, from this trillion there is the lion's share. this, of course, is the american budget of 840 billion dollars, but it is spent in general on everything for the entire global dominance of america in the world. that's 700 bases. thirty countries of the world is a vision of a huge the number of special operations in so many countries that we have not even heard of and i think we do not know the exact number where they conduct these special operations. yes, it's true, and they spent on ukraine. well, about 52-54 billion dollars, almost all this money has already been spent. these are also very large sums. yes, if we add

european money to them - this is a personal amount. this is probably more than the russian military budget at face value, but still not a trillion dollars. yes, and even though such large sums allocated. we see how the pentagon constantly complains about the lack of money. we've run out of stock. we urgently need to find new suppliers in order to replenish our stocks. and a lot of talk about the problems of the russian pc is more than sensible. in my opinion, but of course, there are somewhat similar problems, for example, in the american pc, how much we hear the statement that well, there, for the same stingers, the same jivelins, in order to make up for them, we need 3 -4-5 years ahead. that is it perspective. there, twenty-twenty-seven , twenty-eight. that is, there are serious problems there, of course. 35 problems escalated unexpectedly, because as it turned out, 400 for every 35 need 400 kg of earth metals, which used to be supplied from china. now they are supplied to a lesser extent, because china is cutting into trade wars. again, there are problems here, of course. in my opinion, of course, we shouldn’t underestimate our enemy, but we shouldn’t overestimate him either, but there are problems and there are

their opinion in the economy, well, first of all, of course, it is relevant for europe due to the fact that they will have winter, but i think that the greatest excitement is caused by possible political destabilization in the west and in europe as a whole. we are now seeing this with the fall of some governments in the us in particular, but today we have already touched on the topic, the upcoming midterm congressional elections do not fly to ah. true, one should not expect any miracles from the fact that the republicans there, perhaps, will win, come to power, and so on, but at the same time, yes, we observe rather curious processes. well, literally today. well, yesterday it turns out that the leader of the republicans, you all know the mako sword, but refused to support the allocation of new amounts to ukraine. there, 12-13 billion dollars, why he refused, because, in his opinion, it is necessary to conduct an audit first. how the previous sums were spent, what part was stolen, what went after all for real weapons, which went to ukraine, that is, it is clear that this question is the republicans after a possible victory. will be used in elections as a basis for an attempt to impeach byton, and here the situation gets a little more complicated. why , how the baidn will have to bow to the

republicans, whom he right now calls the semi-fascists of the ultramagician and so on. ah, who at the same time will try to be extremists who will try to impeach him. it is quite possible, but at the same time, somehow, in parallel , turn money from them, perhaps they will still eat the money there, but after bucking a little and so on, but the point is that this will appear some complications plus the choice of the twenty-second year - this is, of course, the dress rehearsal of the twenty- fourth year of the presidential election. a lot we talked about what a-a possible political crisis in the west. well, of course. and, perhaps, it is in the context that if the us administration in washington changes its approach, including ukraine, it will be somewhat different, but the article with which we discussed today, i liked it because it is somewhat synonymous. uh, well a new national defense being developed us strategy, that is, it is there, what is it about, first of all, we need to fight on two fronts, and we are from china and russia at the same time, but this is actually one front, that is, if we are, well, in the usa

they say this, if the usa does not defeat russia, then they will not be able to defeat china, and only by defeating russia will we defeat china in general, such a rather curious one. uh, such a mental somersault. well, uh, he's basically behind a lot of the decisions that are being made in washington right now, and on the other side of the republicans. they have slightly different approach. yes, and they, well, in the context in which we see it now, that is, at the level of analysts from the hoover institution, for example, who will occupy the positions of possible future republican administrations. there i know a trump at a distance of the fortieth. and if he is a dage, they are trying to play some kind of realism to say that well, let's again crank out that old strategy of a brush, heat, that is, try to pit russia against china while somehow temporarily, having reconciled russia and so further, but maybe if the republicans really come into office in 24, which is january 25, they'll try to arrange. well, some temporary respite to say that well, now we will somehow make up a little bit temporarily let's save face, then we will refocus on china and we will try to play russia out of china somehow i

think that it is worth preparing for this of course, you should never relax. if this happens, that's but such a scenario, in my opinion more than likely. and uh, too, well, in many ways, it will probably break the current strategy of war of attrition, which is planned for many years to come. well, at least 2 years and a half years. i think that it will last, but then everything will depend on how, of course, the political situation in the west destabilizes, how much the elites change. i think that this question is still open, that is, but i suggest not to wait for something to change and destabilize. well if so, but we must navigate to another for the worst option. e. on the development of this scenario. uh, today's amazing broadcast actually didn't dispute you, perhaps because there was no economist. yes, otherwise they would be laughing. you would have entered into a discussion with us. eh, this is a paradoxical situation. not everyone is aware of it. the fact is that the

confidence in our victory and in our correctness is really gigantic, but this commitment must be answered with real achievements, because when you are sure that we must win, you are sure that our cause is just how every day it repeats everything, and then you see some notes or do they tell, what would it be? well, in the sense that someone does not release these drones, then you don’t understand. and how so you are right. we must, we can, but this does not happen, and this and therefore social tension can arise not because the masses of the people oppose the military operation. because the masses will say. why is she so inactive? why is there no such victory? why is there no progress? uh, that's the flip side of this loyalty in my opinion. she is not quite aware of some of our people, and it seems to me that she has become the time not to wait. uh, that

someone will carry a humanitarian cargo there or something the reformer needs to the president, since you are the institution to send a letter. please tell me, what can you do here is your institution in order to help solve this functional problem? well, at least soon again yes, there is a war against us, we must defeat the west, but it’s not necessary to arrange everything for everyone, but, probably, the whole nation is interested in this victory and not like that, so that individual people send humanitarian hmm or just military orders to fulfill it, and i'm sure that these e, people will find what to say, find what to write without any tentors and will not demand gigantic money for this. uh, so that they are paid now advertising pushme will continue in the new composition. always wondering where it all starts?

now you will see everything. so, i will answer immediately to everyone who is nervous, we will wait for the official announcements of the ministry of defense. a special military operation i will say again. it 's a hard man's work our heroes do that can. everything is not just a front line, sometimes one side moves, sometimes the other is important, how it all ends. let's sum

up, because when we see the end of this whole operation, in addition to what everything is going to what we know. now this is a local offensive, successes in the kharkov region, what do we know? now what the zapostniks say is the colossal losses in the kherson direction, the coquettish silence of the terrible losses that they had glue in the area. this is what we know for sure, what we know for sure absolutely heroically our fighters, like the national guard of the ministry of defense, are the absolute heroes of the dpr lpr. guys, conscripts, who are men who stand, that we still know that at the same time, normal life is normal in the country. and it wouldn't hurt to get back together a little. and it would not hurt to turn on the regime already, realizing that nato is fighting with us with all its might, so get together and act tough. and by the way, pay attention to

ukraine, not a single word. not a single word that any blogger can afford to say strict information control everything is rolled up in asphalt, checking phones. god forbid, they are subscribed to russian telegram channels. right there in the hut we have absolute freedom. what gives room for panic and for the cycle to work? i want to remind you harder, if stalin was serious, who called for shooting at alarmists, but you still need to pay special attention. we must also clearly understand, not bringing true information from the field. at all levels of government this is a crime for which alexander must also be punished. as i understand it, only from the territory. yes, just arrived today. i was on a train from rostov yesterday. uh, we were there under carbon for several days, i have

units there for me very close as because we are just with them. uh, just saw how they stormed. mariupol is just about how you say, donetsk fighters are those who are heroically not easy. here they are, i can say that it’s 60-70 km from ugoldar to donetsk, and i went with me, there is a man. he says i haven't been home for half a year, i haven't been home for half a year, i haven't seen my children, i haven't seen my wife. didn't see anyone. that's just even elementary e he by no means did he say any weakness of anything. but i just understand, my eyes don’t burn very much, that is, well, i probably need to think about the command, maybe a rotation. well, at least a week-long vacation should be even in these difficult conditions, because of course. titanic work to do, as for donetsk? of course, of course, this is donetsk, this is a special battalion. uh, more precisely, a separate special-purpose battalion, guys. heroic, of course, as far as it's concerned. that's what you say, who are against their own, firstly. uh,

already buzzing. here are those, uh, those exchanges that were with the basics. they are literally now all there outside the territory, because here is a coal miner. pavlovka is just 2 km, where we were from the village of nikolsky and where it was, where is st. nicholas st. nicholas in. uh, the vasilyevsky convent, which has been located all these days, it’s just there that i wonder, the abbot showed the north side, where it is completely north side, exactly, uh, to the side, where u stand, pavlovsk, here to ukraine yes and here here this, please, these shots. this is the north side and completely shelled and before shelling from this cathedral, but i want to say, why we came up immediately drones flew in, and you can hear them, there and on the site, he says running. this is how we got here . here under these under these sheds to at least, uh, avoid these uh unnecessary

shelling, because look what they did to the temple. this is not the abbot, it just shows, but he told one amazing story when his yoke flew here hail. you see, he shows a rocket there, just sticking out, hailstones flew in and the abbess stood. down here, and the vacuum knocked out, uh, the lowered temple doors that were locked. the abbot turned out to be inside not scratching anything, this is an amazing thing, which really is. this is what they showed, but what am i talking about? i asked. they are orthodox people, it seems like yes, and what does he say? why? what is justified by the fact that it is cynical to shoot an orthodox church? well, he says, there is nothing sacred there, because even, by the way, brought this trophy a small one who is fighting yes , aidar’s attack aircraft all red are all the attributes there regarding ukraine or death e we are there ukraine above all all this is present, so we

must understand who we are fighting there, then further minefields, when their e , sappers worked so at 20 m, and the length and 100 e-e 1.5 m wide 70 anti-personnel meters. installation density. this speaks of how why. here i know when it is necessary to clear one’s brains ; everyone needs to go there periodically, because the one who reads telegram channels on the couch, you probably know the conversations there. well, why not take it there? slavyansk why can not the keyboard. but even here it’s elementary pavlovka there, 3 km to it there is to go through minefields, this is to go through shelling. it 's really hard, so in this case, uh, the work is hard. we have, and absolutely, or rather, the personnel of the ukrainian army. he is very equipped has everyone practically has a night.

uh, night vision device what exactly? unfortunately, we do not have, therefore, returning to our indeed, the industry of our economy must provide our fighters with precisely this first necessity, therefore, uh, that's how you say, we have, yes, without any failures , failures should be taught. and if we suppose we have a failure, we need to draw conclusions and coordinated, 10, which will, uh, guess next time and not allow such things, so here we are returning from there. and by the way, a very important point, just if the last time when we were in mariupol we were just liberating mariupol was a military city, donetsk was relatively peaceful now everything has completely changed to the sea, even though it has already been destroyed there. but he is peaceful, he goes there, trade is something else. but donetsk unfortunately, it became a front-line shelling. i spent the night there for 2 days, for

2 days there is a cannonade, water. no, this is a difficult story, but nevertheless, they are heroic people and they, of course, have confidence, but they need to be helped by the whole world. here comes the news of the authorities of the region of the kharkiv region , a reserve connection of the armed forces along the entire line is coming contact, fighting continues. so it's hard work. let's wait for the results. sight 516 level 0 charge full tube 125 charged gun for 300 yes fly leaflets

movement through the minefield now tanchik will pass. let's translate from clerical, but understandable, everything is not so

scary if there is an instruction. let's take a look at them and find out how they

cope with it. today we are watching 4 minutes of cartoons that you can watch anywhere on anything. and most importantly, whatever. i have too.

zakhar well, i read your telegram channel without excerpt i'm watching what's going on surprised i caught you. do you come here often? yes, it often happens, and just in this direction i have one of the most active areas of work there, because i have a humanitarian center there.