i will probably somehow continue the line that margarita outlined, maybe from the other side, because i am in many respects or practically. in general, i agree that he said, well, uh, it seems to me that there really is one of the first questions to our informational psychological state. it is very simple. on the one hand, we need to have, uh, no so to speak, and uh, develop no high expectations and a hat of indulgence, but on the other hand. uh don't need to have no parasitism on uh, panic it it all became panic. two sides of the same coin. in general, i think that, well, there is a situation that i will discuss further, here are any existing information. tools that pursue the goal of popularity in various forms

expressed yes, there from the rating in to the subscribers there and so on. here is in these circumstances. from my point of view, not entirely appropriate. this is the first second er well, it's very important to remember who you are, yes, don't forget about it and try to be professional. that's because again continues your line i'll say that i am well here, since the fourteenth year, no one has been considering me, no one has told me about this, it is not listed in any contract with me, but i consider myself in the service. well, when in the fourteenth year this happened with the donbass, it began to happen to me in the service of our state, because i understand for sure that i relaxed myself so much. once again i say, no one gives me any special contract and shoulder straps or something else to do this. here is my self-definition. here it is, maybe anyone else has it , maybe, but i'm looking at it

just like that, because i think that this is the most fundamental question, you understand, yes, you can love the motherland and you need to love it. it’s necessary but you can only serve the state, because the state is a form of existence of the motherland in no other concrete form, more definitely this is the great and abstract concept of the motherland, that in the end you still do everything for it, but it is given to you through the state and here is what you discussed about the sixteenth year and about you understand. go, you took place a complete victory, but in this sense, society it is necessary to the state and here is the society in february of the eighteenth year. well, i got a country and a homeland. and the state destroyed 17, and i said 18,

yes, but the state destroyed it. and then there was just a struggle over who could start restoring it. this is a destroyed state and war. as a result, a small war and the revival of the country of the motherland went through the restoration of the state. although all this could not have been done, therefore, i’ll say it again, this is what or do you know in the last years of the war and after the war, when the vlasovite had all this formed in ideology? they they deliberately dragged this theory through their entire ideology, we love our homeland. and the fatherland no, come on, the state was meant there, of course. well, how interesting, out of love for the motherland, you go to serve another foreign state; you supposedly love your motherland, but you serve the enemy of a foreign

state, not an abstract enemy. rita you understand this is very important, because here are those who are going to rallies there in lithuania where they are still going there. they all shout, like vlasov and dominate. eh, we love our homeland, don't interfere with us love the homeland, but the state we hate, we do not like it, but with her husband to a foreign state. and that doesn't bother anyone. it is necessary to love the motherland, but it is necessary to serve your state. is this the second thing i wanted to say? do you understand the third? i, well, yes, i served in the soviet army. here i have a private on my military id. therefore, i think that it would be good for many, many to look before writing here on social networks, well, on your military id, so the question. well, so just think a little meditate, well, in the mirror

you can watch, or you can see military tickets, well, for men, at least, many to many. well , i definitely understand. we will definitely not be able to avoid all this fate of the historical process. what process i am deeply convinced that in august 45, the united states began the first world estonian history of the war for world domination, they started it with our country the soviet union started it to drop bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki that's when the first real full-fledged world war began in the history of mankind war or war for world domination. it was different from wwii because it was wars, previous eras and 72 years since then. from this

moment of dropping the bombs from it, you can easily count the united states without ceasing, only maneuvering an unceasing war to destroy us, because with the worldview of the people that exists completely by russia due to its geography of history, no concept of world domination is possible. and for the americans and the west, this is the main concept and the main purpose of their existence. yes we tried, starting with a comrade stalin to fight for peace and we really fought for it . stalin dissolved the international to show them that we do not have our own idea of ​​world domination. khrushchev generally said that we would live. live as you wish. that's exactly the quote and

yes, just don't interfere with us and then announced a policy of peaceful existence. well, first of all, he lived and reached the helsinki act. yes, there was a quintessence. it was gorbachev's idea that he generally came to say that we are one-sided. we are leaving this war. here is the world and we will be we hope that we will now be on an equal footing agree on everything. here is one moment from this whole story. america did not even think about the fact that they would give up their main goal and the second goal of destroying us, as hindering the achievement of this main goal. and this is where we have to start. this war has been going on for 72 years to this day, the same war declared by the americans to us. for their goal of achieving world domination, how long will it last? i can't say i well, i know that it will only come in handy at

the moment when we deprive the opportunity, united states to wage this war. what kind of existence will they not agree to? and nothing else should come from this. you see, maybe it sounds somehow abstract, but i am deeply convinced that exactly this determines everything. this knowledge determines everything. at the same time, i understand that probably the beginning of the 2000s. we began to lose this hope for a peaceful existence very actively, probably in the fourteenth year. in the fifteenth it was clear that this was absolutely impossible , but we live in reality. we start from they still remember such a bottom, here are the same

nineties hmm and we really act in a situation. well. the reality of the reality of the resources of the reality of the possibilities and therefore this does not mean that, well, somehow we should be afraid of something there. that's where the whole nato is. no, you just need to understand. yes , the whole nato has always had the opportunity to collapse, we have no. here they want one thing, they want us to either become slaves, and whoever does not agree, you must die. this is not a poetic metaphor. this is the crux of the matter. and here the pike is returning alone your thesis about ukraine i think that for the most part they are not talking about ukrainian power, and well, power, of course, in quotation marks. yes , there is a big control clique in this one. and

for sure, and who completely shares everyone? nationalist nazi ideology. here they are all on the side of the united states in this sense, they are not part of the ukrainian people, about which we say that we are one people, and this also needs to be understood. yes, because, well, those who serve the united states there for money for self-interest for more something and are complicit in the american goal of our destruction. they are not part of the same people with us and cannot be. at the same time, many in this territory are indeed so, but do not distinguish and share this, we simply cannot continue it is impossible, because it is accepted

as reality. well, just like you know, when we say a civil war, probably, well , uh, was there, for example, a war and a battle with them, the vlasovites, a civil one. no, of course, it’s true, even if we turn to the civil war, which in our history is called civil. i always ask myself an interesting civil war. that's when most of the white fronts were in full supply, and so to speak, target designation of the entente. i don't want us to start it somehow, well, to live and understand, because the border between uh, our strangers, from my point of view, historically runs somewhere here. yes, well, in this sense, how i started the topic ended, yes, you need to love the motherland, but you need to serve your state,

otherwise you will go to serve another and then one and the same same way. well, you know the last thing, volodya, i have a lot in my head. there are a lot of tips. now, but i sincerely feel strongly that let them stay there in my head. i'm not going to release them. thank you, well, except for everything away there is already a war and we need diplomatic armor. now they are there for three years, i did not say. well, we have someone to tell her, she's doing well, but we had specialists. yes, we are correct. we have, i 'll say, some ebony nations, er, indeed. so to say, the americans have not been satisfied for a long time. uh, the essence of the organization of the exchange of nations initially, as it was conceived and began from the fact that for a long time already the americans among the americans and the american establishment, it was customary to replace the principles that the principles, he, which were laid down in

the charter. he has long ceased to suit them. charter. naturally, a replacement was invented, an order based on rules that allow them to manipulate, so to speak, their own actions and everything that they want to do, therefore, this was the first step that they plan to fulfill, but naturally. uh, taking into account the fact that russian citizens practically no longer work in the un secretariat. long time secretary. it is filled with anyone, but not our representatives. this also allows them. uh, completely uh, manipulate uh, various actions to provide visas not to rearrange the invitation on time, and so on and so forth we see that our minister of foreign affairs, unfortunately, cannot get to the assembly session well , was this really conceivable before, when was originally conceived by explanatory nations. i believe that they support the fact that the country that bombarded hiroshima, so to speak, and the nasaks

should not have allowed this country to host the headquarters of such a serious organization on its territory. and when we dig a little and find out what, uh? uh, the land was provided by the rockefellers, but that also raises some questions for us. as for the current situation in the young nations, naturally the americans are extremely interested in reforming it in such a way that they feel comfortable and continue to turn their affairs of interest only to them and the fact that the united nations was already invented to replace the united nations, the summit was invented by democracy. this also inspires us to certain thoughts that it cannot suit the americans in its present form. therefore, it is possible that organizations will be organized after some period of time. the same situation can be expected that happened with the cast nation,

when it simply ceased to exist, because there was a big war. well, as far as the americans are concerned, it is natural that we see that and during the first world war and in the second world war , during the period of time when all of europe was at war , the americans were able to drag, as they say, nuts from the fire, to them. it was also beneficial that now this european security crisis has occurred on the territory of ukraine, of course, it is artificial , man-made, because it has been planned for a long time . it was planned for a long time, if earlier in the doctrinal documents and nato and, uh, american uh, a little bit, so to speak, the fact that who is a strategic adversary, now, of course, a reflection of the fact that the americans and nato countries are planning to inflict a strategic defeat on russia. it hasn't been hidden for a long time. this is their primary goal, this is what they are guided by.

why do they orientate themselves to this, but because, of course, we also read the scientific literature, where it was said that russia has too many minerals and all sorts of other interesting things that it should share with. and so, of course, in this situation, the americans have long wanted to somehow somehow. e s russia to enter into such a crisis crisis period. when to try to somehow apply. uh, serious damage to our country. well , naturally, over the past 8 years , such an anti-gos anti-russia has been created on the territory of ukraine, a place where the americans could well turn around and conduct a covert struggle. against our country, and the fact that only during the biden administration was delivered weapons worth 15 billion dollars to the united states of america, this figure also says something about the fact that we are not fighting with ukraine a s e with the collective west, in particular with the

state. returning to information work. i would like to say just a few words at the eastern economic forum, and there, on one of the panels, maria zakharova , well-known to us, was present, and there they were very seriously discussing this issue that it is necessary to devote serious phenomena to information work, because in such conditions which we are now without it is absolutely impossible. and i think that mm what was shown to us blinkin's statement about russia, and so on. i consider this statement by blinkin as an attempt to deprive the russian people and its individual representatives of faith in themselves, faith in their country, faith in their army. but i think that this is a completely groundless statement and does not have any basis, i am sure that our grandfathers, who in

the forty-first year, according to various calculations, passed along the red. sidi went to the front, even then, in that terrible situation, they believed in themselves and did not lose hope that victory would be ours. andrey, well i have a slightly different approach to the united nations about which i now understand, it was a report. as a matter of fact, linda thomas greenfield yes, who nominated six princes, which, in fact, is not discussed now that the united states intends to reform the united nations organization, i would not agree that it was created, how and when it was created. here is such a plan for the americans, uh, there is no way to subdue uh destroy russia, the americans always have a plan fit fit into the design of the world that they saw, i did not say that they were planning and now they are not talking about you. now. i'm not talking about you here dmitry said that they immediately had the idea to destroy russia yes, such ideas, at

least in the thirty-ninth year. they didn't put it on in 1942, when roosevel came up with this idea of ​​four cops, which he founded this idea. ah, grounds. jonah is the four policemen the world divided. okay, but the united states just ended up there, uh, well, even geographical position of the quarter overseer. i'm not saying that it was impossible not to place 2/3 of the world's gold reserves of 45% of industry on the territory of the united states. right now the united states is the highest contributor to un funding of about 12 billion. yes, they are paying china is paying. despite the fact that it is considered the first economy in the world, it pays only two. no already 12 already 12 seemed to be two, yes, russia 500 million. yes, russia is not 500 million. i approximately think that with greenfield because, because not changes until the proportion is changed. they were to be discussed at the baseon. they didn't change everything for the united states. in principle, both

reform issues. it was staged in the forty-fifth year almost one reformulil. this is the sixty-third resolution of 1991. but when was the composition expanded? permanent members from 11 to 15 and more, such a democratization was introduced, when the regions themselves could already now regional organizations appoint member states, because until the sixty- third year, usually members from a certain group chosen by agreement. this is the five permanent members of the un. that is, it has never been a democratic organization. it was aimed at leading the world. a definite different thing that this leadership did not work out is that the united states ignited the cold war and decided that in this cold war they would defeat the soviet union. this changed, turned it from a platform from a world government in quotation marks into a platform for sorting out the first 30 branches that were

taken out. those were beta soviet union uh-huh but un decision, you understand now greenfield again says 29 years after the ninety-first year, what does this mean? and russian diplomacy tells me we don’t put forward questions that they would vibrate, you know, yellow vests are speaking in france. listen. let's bring it to the security council to consider the brutality of the french police against citizens. well, they are bringing the issue of xinjiang on human rights. let's introduce human rights in france as they are respected in the twentieth year. we had about 20 reasons to to ask americans what they are doing, what is going on in american cities. we also do not introduce this, proceeding from the fact that we recognize that we still have diplomacy, if we still have diplomacy, if we defend the principle of international law, i will answer with a margarita. why we do not fight is the principle of the laws and rules of war,

fixed in the hague geneva conferences. e convention, if we comply with them, then hitting infrastructure facilities is, if possible , prohibited. that is, avoid as much as possible. strikes on cultural heritage sites of educational institutions. well, in hospitals there are only roads and so on. andrey, she knows about this, but she rejects this. this she rejects. now she rejects the law of the international they say, this is the rule guys. here the rules we have mean one thing for me, we, and we oath of international law, gave this one, the people, in general, the only one that, please forgive me, let's work it out. i'm just saying that either we accept that current international law is not works. and we constantly say it doesn't work, the united states breaks the rules. rules this means it is a synonym for a synonym for american law, in fact the

american rules, because the extraterritorial principle. i'm sorry. truth. marshall's plan is the main principle of its operation. this reality is not american jurisdiction in the administration. this principle of extraterritoriality is still being applied to local courts. and now this is being transformed into rules, but in the last few weeks, it’s literally mid-august, and i'm seeing a very interesting thing and thomas greenfield er, the woman captures the idea correctly. she says, and we protect mustafon. that is, we protect. uh, international law maybe, and it's only now that the americans are moving on. well, now it will pass. uh, haute couture week. oh, well, in general, the general assembly will be held in a diplomat. have that one there and they'll give it up again. well, for now, at least, they insist on protecting the principles laid down in the charter of territorial integrity, sovereignty, peace security. that's what she pawned it. she

said no, not a single side, which of course would not violate, that is, which there is no claim, but now that's enough. you understand american diplomacy here and there, on the one hand. they perfectly understand one thing. volodya in the global south, the rules do not apply. they would like to be based on law they perfectly understand what is profitable at the moment, of course, they forget what happened 2 seconds ago in rhetoric and the concept of law appeared again the concept of these six principles that they are making agreed upon, they are now playing an ingenious combination. i talked about this and that they understand that nato has an advantage in terms of numerical strength and in conventional weapons compared to russia. well, it’s just that we have one investment resource in terms of quantity, so everyone has come out

perfectly, so what are they doing now. yes, they really fight in ukraine with all their practically, what they already have, including manpower, called mercenaries, realizing that, well, we don’t we will use strategic weapons, like. well, no, no, they think so, they think so. well they will because the russians said there are red lines, a red line is a red line. but they did at the end. we are right now this one, the ukrainian cretin declares that rammstein said that everything we can put the question to you. can we not be afraid of anything, we will try to destroy russia, that is, the americans, purely clearly play their game. well, that's why you have to break in, break the united states for the united states always play for a move, of course, we know how to move. we have a checker, forward, a checker back , you understand, as a rule, because in the big game, so to speak. well, rossi never played. we

are a continental power. we simply cannot play such a big multi-way game because of our geographical position, the united states is a sea power that has been for a long time. and even now, if we are excluded from the equation, they are generally safe in essence, because now there is no other power, except for russia, which could destroy, which is why americans always play multi-move. now he says there is such a power, and next to pull out an umbrella next to a comrade, kim, who we now have. yes? let's comrade comrades after the thirtieth year. this is a non-marconian family, where every day there are arguments about what they will watch today. let's take a look at them and find out how they deal with it . quietly someone is in favor of watching

cartoons tomorrow today we watch 4 minutes of news, then a series 3 minutes before advertising, where no one ever swears. because each of them has hand watch app that you can watch anywhere on anything. and most importantly, whatever. i also have a look. it's always interesting how it all starts. now everyone will see the producers of good things they want and most importantly, but it is best

to check.

we remember that already before the onset of covid-19, the president had the initiative to permanently convene members of the un and discuss such current issues that the diplomatic bodies are worried about. listen, the yellow vests are suffering in france, you could put this question and the americans in i just needed to get together and talk. no, they are here, look. andrey, you just need to understand, which means