we remember that already before the covid-19 linkage, the president had the initiative to permanently convene the un members and discuss such current issues that the diplomatic bodies are worried about. look, yellow vests are suffering in france, you could put this issue and the americans in that you could just get together and talk. yes, they are no, they are not at all, why do you understand? andrey, you just need to understand, which means that now i said that, in principle, it was

just not some kind of refinement, yes, because the guys, of course, do not want to agree to go to that, in the mainstream, keep here. yes, they do not want to understand? here i am again, how not to. here is a real lifesaver. and damn we are. vanka, probably, the moving stove herself is offended by this. you see, we don't use chopsticks. wait well, let me speak. i have already said very briefly, yes, so trump cards, you appealed to me. well, i should shut up for a minute. you understand what's the matter. you understand what is the matter of the right, the veto is valid in the event that the majority is for the majority. here after the collapse of the soviet camp in the security council, the majority is for and then one person with rights comes out and says, and i don’t care,

i have the rights of the majority. wait, listen, after the collapse of the soviet camp, the russian federation has, uh, permanently in the un security council, in addition to regular clients, a dozen more. not just 15. you see, you even know me better, therefore. the majority is almost always on the side of the americans after the collapse of the soviet camp, so he does not need to use the right wind. well , let's be here, if we're talking about something, let's talk seriously. that's where we delve into the depths and ask a question. let's be serious, the united states is rightfully fighting for commonality. no, you're the idea. the main thing is that the right of the century should be proved to the general assembly how it changes what i said to the trinidad of

tobacco and everything else, this caribbean one, it will decide whether it is reasonable or not. yes. and if we are chinese, listen, i also made it more than once. here are some warnings. the whole history of chinese. no, it helped. all right, it's time was given a job. no, the economic commission created different pressures. at first it was political, what they achieved was that the republic of china took the place of the republic of china out of the people's republic of china, and before that, until the seventy-ninth year, i remind you i sat there, the republic, china taiwan, that is , therefore, the chinese, as when all the time they indicated their position everywhere everywhere and always it was very from the point of view. we got this thanks to our people. that was it, that was it. this is what you need

talk lesh well, it's different things working here when he announced. here exhibited all exhibited. yes, he exposed himself diplomatically to enter there the west and, in general, the hegemotic powers, by the way, including the soviet union in the sixties. he thus took his position or presented himself as the leader of the third world that is, as the leader of the developing countries , let me remind you that in 2010 china considered, maybe lyosha corrected me, a large developing one kept and received assistance from the european union and from european states, you know, because exactly, because china has always had an asterisk wrongly drawn on the flag at the olympics . there you are. yeah, because our flag can't be said that way. and we said, well, okay, god was wrong with him. well, yes, well, it's still not

important. andrey is some kind of principled multi-move. so they supported the ponies since 905 of the last century against us, when we fought with them. they were placed, and then japan fired at them with the same weapon. they have been germany for a long time this is a multi-move. what did it lead to? here, well, it's true that the emotions of september 11 are also not accidental, but listen to the question to another, the question is not in them, the question is in us. and why do we expect from those that they will be our friends. let's go out because of our time most. they have a meaning, look there is the cis when do we finish for the sixth year, what is february 5th? yes, in my opinion, there is not much time left for negotiations. we don't lead. this treaty will close on its own. why let

the americans still people time to accuse us that we do the whole country they owe us afraid. they should not after accuse be afraid they wanted to come out and so they are afraid. if if they were not afraid of the checkpoint, two, they were not afraid, international politicians would fight. with uh, nato symbols would have fought in ukraine if, ​​firstly, they were not afraid, firstly, they are not afraid of us, no, nothing of us, they are not afraid. today they were afraid of us, they would not substitute in such a quantity and perhaps given equipment and everything else and their specialists. they just aren’t afraid of us, they shouldn’t be afraid under their own flag, and why do they howl to patients calculated precisely easily, for themselves, why would they risk themselves? they love operations on strangers.

now they have a whole country, which they are ready to declare, we never sent our soldiers there, that's right, because it means a star stripe under the flag. that means they're doing a false flag operation where they're sending them anyway. they are called a mercenary there a wild amount, there is also black water the past academies of all the others are few it comes out there quite well-known media faces, former commentators, they are sent there by someone back in a zinc coffin and some plastic bags there, but many of them lit up. now they are joyfully shouting, and moama givmiamo and everything else. i never knew that the main language in ukraine is now english, at least in the armed forces well, so wow. they perfectly understand what the americans are doing. they are fighting on all fronts. they are not afraid of us. but we need to make sure that they realize that they have inflicted fear on us. blow would why why? 'cause

if they understand they can try now solve the problem in other ways. why would he theoretically risk himself? this is not called fear, but calculation no, this is called button accordion. no, nothing like that, they clearly coldly consider at the same time what they are doing now. take a hit - it’s just that they will solve for themselves the issues of europe’s economic competitor; they are destroying the slavic issue for themselves, watching how the slavs kill each other. they understand very clearly what they are doing. therefore, we also need to understand their plans well and, based on this, build our own. here unexpectedly donald trump let it slip, look. afghanistan, it was done so incompetently when it first brings out the soldiers. at first it never happened. we left, but

we would have kept the hooks. by the way, because why had to keep the bagram. i asked about it, because the answer to the democrats say that this army has already begun. when you were still president, no no no i made them a certain level of quantity, and then we had to follow many guidelines that they carried the first, what had to be done by this people, the americans equipment. we left $85 billion worth of equipment. this should never happen. we went out, we had to keep wagram located in the part of china where they produce nuclear weapons. we shouldn't have lost it, but we did. that is, he admitted on indian television that they used the base bagram to track china and for the possibility of military related to this fact, yes, but i understand that he was talking, probably, about ah berry objects in the desert, a kolbakan, where the chinese nuclear test site and hour are actually located. this is

to keep in mind, probably, flying hours after all. they drive down the road, but it's obvious that china, uh, the americans are very concerned. i would go, frankly, on the other hand, just here is the eastern economic forum, which we talked about and the speech that was very interesting after the russian president spoke, the eastern leaders spoke in accordance with the jamshu of the chairman of all chinese meetings of the people of the representatives of and e, in all their speeches and in the speech of the chinese representative and, accordingly, of india, e, malaysia, and so on, one very few interesting things appeared that you need to pay attention to, something that we talked about today is strange most of all. or about themselves, and not about the russian situation, because this must be clearly understood, because they are most concerned. and what will happen to us, but they all react very painfully. eh, because that's what is now reaching us to people from the eastern consciousness. i had there who

to the east came, to be honest, more than a century ago. we have never been under colonial dependence for real, and many countries have been under it for decades, and china, strictly speaking, uh, there for more than 150 years, if you take 1.960 years until almost the end, uh, until the forty-ninth year 1.049. and now these countries understand that when 1860 the year of graduation sounded 900, they yes, yes. yes, i understand that the opium wars yes, the founding of the prc and strictly speaking, for example, china had to pay various indemnities until 1956. you there, including the soviet union, would not advocate that this all stop, but all these countries and malaysia and indonesia, china and so on. they understand perfectly well what foreign control over your e finances is, it is the customs of life over everything and they could not get out from under

this if there were no events that took place after the second world war. this is clear. and uh, those countries got a vote. won, in fact, including strange, not the most powerful from an economic point of view, and it turned out that to the end with this voice. i am took advantage of something and can not. well, because money plays the main role. and so china began a very long race to create its own e, economic subjectivity, and these countries were originally these countries. i mean now. uh, from china big to, for example. the same e sri lanka or hmm myanmar, someone is successful, someone is unsuccessful, but they took the run to e, creation. and independence and in writing in world processes, but they will give it to the end and they didn’t give it and that’s why they understand what is happening with russia because they initially these countries began to take the course of the national revival in the nineties in

russia about the national revival in general, no one said there was such a thought. note. we had the main idea to fit into the west and become the same as, uh, like the west, roughly speaking, and when we started to cut out from there. this is a very painful process. after all, now we have, in fact, some kind of birth trauma, birth pains, and some of our eastern neighbors also perceive this, that this is a dispute between representatives of western civilization. russia the western side quarreled with the same western guys, which of them is right, it's hard to say, but when did it suddenly turn out that russia started the correct form? here are the meanings that we are not howling the west. we do not howl with culture as such, we give it with certain manifestations, including, for example, the russian president, in response to questions at the forum, she said such a word there, colonialism , anti-colonia, and so on. this is the right approach, because how often the same trump says, he

does not notice, as many of us notice, that we have the idea that one side or a group of countries can dictate the conditions of life of the economic political to other countries, and this is the column of colonialism in the thinking of the colonial system. no thinking, it remains. and here, just the eastern countries react more clearly to this, but there is another point, again, eastern economic forms, which showed this very well. here on one side are sitting, uh, businessmen, business executives, who are talking guys. here we lack certain initiatives of the state and the state in our eastern direction, and the state, many ministry let's discuss. but at the same time, there are absolute abstractions that we have left from uh there from 5-6 years ago, when we are discussing the sco brix, these huge organizations are actually correct. but when we can’t position them correctly, when all this goes

into abstraction, then i read interesting uh, reviews on social networks of chinese and indians, since indians write in english, they don’t heard, for example, ask you and brix that they wanted to hear how these tools can serve as an amplification. yes, it may be, we hope it will not fall apart. well, its influence will weaken, that with the excellent brix we bring gravity there, as we propose, again, we propose to hold another conference. at the meeting, many come forward and talk about the development of relations with the eastern countries, including, uh, with china, uh, primarily with numbers. you spent so many meetings attended them. listen to people where are you from? actually, we already, uh, we need efficiency. we also need to call the kpi of this whole thing. it is an extremely interesting panel that is taking place, and i participated there, as rectors of leading universities are participating. uh, the far east and the largest university is located there, the famous yes. e. pacific

university in khabarovsk blagoveshchensk that is, these are such pillars of training for the far east , not only there are those that will work. china is also preparing transport workers engineers, then there is an intellectual here, and they are all cool people, to be honest. they admit that we don’t have this eastern component of personnel training, personnel, the main ones are being trained in moscow, and with respect for moscow , you have to turn to the east. this is not even an economic question, this question is primarily psychological and emotionality, we will have to live with this and we must understand that the inertia that people have in their heads of many people. eh, here. journalists to e politicians from economists to businessmen, here it will have to be overcome and finally the question has been raised and, er,

in my opinion. now we are now moving in the right direction perfectly. i agree with the question about bam about the transsib. how much have we talked about it? eh, because after all, there are also problems in the fact that we do not have enough bandwidth, not only throughput. we are now sending our goods to the east, and basically it turns out that without axle load we cannot build up. that is, we can no longer load the wagons, otherwise we will destroy everything, we cannot speed up the passage, but because there is a certain schedule. and when they talked about it five or six years ago, no one reacts to it. and now, hmm , you know, i wanted to say, by the way, that the official announcement has already passed. uh, the russian ambassador to china, andreyevich denisov, is leaving his position; he was accepted, uh, everything is in order. for the chinese state, they're here wondering what they noted. firstly, it was accepted by an interesting tit - this is secretary of the port committee of the chinese mead so that he

never receives anyone. this man. well, he 's busy with other things. the child of the legend man is absolutely a legendary man who speaks chinese, er, better than some chinese. this is true, and this is not the case, no one has american ambassadors. it's uh diesel, awesome, and he says he's a man who can tell jokes in chinese and the chinese can laugh to show it so that 's what the chinese said at that time? dense stay at your post. uh, our product turnover in adults is 50%, and i remind you that it was also when we had both a fall uh, and there was uh, that is, i was on the floor, there in 2018 the nineteenth year there were falls that were very difficult. here we have increased turnover. with china, it was clear that we would increase either . we need to build up transport routes, we had to build them up. uh, training specialists, and we didn't do that. and this is when my opinion says that we are always lagging behind in many ways. why is china so concerned. and this is understandable. he

perfectly understands that in taiwan. so the conflict between taiwan and china will be exactly the same as russia ukraine is now, that's one to one for sure. in the same way, taiwan imbues weapons in exactly the same way. the question will be. uh, then now china will be spread rot on all positions related to the violation of human rights, all this will be, therefore, china is concerned. we have everything right, but learn a joint exercise with china there with mongolia, but the main problem is that if now we will not learn to fit into the eastern context, we will still be considered in the eastern states as a kind of native, as an alien element, as a country that, e.g., collaborated with the west, generally trained specialists in the west and other languages. we had western and see all the textbooks. they were targeting the western model. here we are now, as it were, really offended. we unfolded, like history. we

know the history of the west but practically do not know the history of the east absolutely in the process of learning even in schools. yes, and look, even when we read the pro-russian eastern direction is white, the russian far east is mainly described there. well, what about khabarov, dezhnev, and so on, but most of all it is described, how beautifully she fought in the west, how did she move there? and to the east, by chance, some cossacks came and suddenly we have an increase there. and now, it turns out that these are not just many of the largest russian companies that are now starting to work in the eastern direction and russian and going beyond the eastern frontiers. they almost don't understand. how did it form, russian far east legion show chairman of all chinese people's congress representatives speaking at the forum says an interesting phrase. e, we are ready to support and cooperate in every possible way in the development of the russian far east, and this is good. everything sounds like everything has been said for the first time before

china well, in recent years he told me about this, but then he says that we had plans outlined, that is, a subtle hint that, in fact , this has already happened, where were you guys? what is the question here and here is the main task now, if we we want to get a normal political economic educational technological coalition. as the countries of the east are very contradictory, we will have to noticeably rebuild everything. here we are we will not be able to simply take the same matrices to lead the west to the east from education to technology. and here is the main point. the most important thing now is to overcome this inertia that many people have in their heads. step by step to a great idea, i will not speak chinese, but this, in my opinion, is one of the deeds and the road. i am i won't say dali starts with the first step. this is all right, right? nevertheless, i will return to

the public discussion with which we started. moreover, it also affects the belarusian society. and we are in the same information space . for all the emotionality of the different points of view that are expressed and the sharpness , one moment is sometimes very important that should not be missed, practically none of those who participate in this discussion about recent events questions the purpose of the special military operation. no one says that everything let's agree, no one says. why is this here? this is very important all the same, because the enemy would probably have counted on a different reaction than that in russia with different political points of view, this patriotic consensus exists - this is a fundamental point. what are people discussing? our military, the fate of those who are in the liberated territories of refugees

, are sometimes naively, sometimes emotionally offered their own recipes for resolving the issue, and this emotional outburst. it is also very important, and as margarita simonovna rightly said, it needs to be heard, and it seems to me that it is partly heard about many parallels with historical moments that have already been drawn. often the great patriotic war is remembered, but in fact, we are experiencing for the first time such a big war in the conditions of this information society. although even before we have stereotypical thinking, not only about asian history, about our own, we perceive many of our historical wars, which seem to be just a symbol of such invincible spirit, as one continuous success there russian-turkish, and there were very difficult moments. take that, which ended with a bunch of kainarji peace and the annexation of the south, all this, where the fighting is now taking place , was there too. many different things, when rumyantsev and suvorov fought here, they recalled the war

of the twelfth year. it took place under incredible public pressure. the change of barclay de tolle to kutuzov was caused by the pressure of public opinion. who was then moscow st. petersburg the nobility and the battle of borodino were given under the pressure of public opinion. it 's just, uh, you need to present these moments of your history, including more clearly and concretely. of course we can't by any means. uh, there's military stuff involved here , but at the same time, there are some indicator factors that just need to be fixed. yes , the west has put a lot of its mercenary equipment on ukraine. but they also talk about it , lingz has not started to work at full capacity, and here we need to work ahead of the curve. that is, look perfect forms of supply support for the army, including do not deny private initiatives that have now arisen, just to say - says - and let's whom, as they stick. no, but we didn't. they

have a different system, not a one-party system. here, in general, a lot of other things are different. russia is a country of victorious capitalism. and it is necessary to use these capitalist forms of public-private partnership, no matter how much someone likes it. i'll give an example. there was a zimgor in russia, when shells arose in great britain, a crisis in in the fifteenth year, they simply took and nationalized almost the entire defense industry de facto. including canceling supply contracts. they have their own weapons, other countries. this is one example obviously. you need to change about your ways and means of communication with society i will give an example. you are saying in vain that, as it were, someone in society is almost hysterical. yesterday, the day of moscow, i walked the streets of moscow and i will say that everything is fine. you will rarely find posters somewhere that reflect the theme and your own. yes, they already have. uh, there's posters in

regions with our heroes. well, for example, i was in the zaporizhia region and the luhansk people's republic where at every step it is written we are together with russia. if we say that the same visual agitation, we have all over russia well, we probably exaggerate. probably rightly people are outraged when the respected band leningrad in these circumstances at the bottom of moscow sings a song. uh, moscow, for whom do your bells ring and there is a sequel, probably rightly people have a question about this, because the method of communication not only of the authorities and society, but also of each leader of public opinion and society, must be matched with the fact that a special military operation is underway. a question was raised here . why was it a commercial concert? it just happened yesterday, but not here. i'm just a city of moscow, we can recall the negative examples of the same world war i, which led to a deplorable ending, despite the brusilovsky breakthrough and so on, when funded by

the same zimgor, but if anyone is interested, let will look, there is no time in detail explains what it is? this is kabbalah, how a specially organized organization in restaurants of the rich wrote off bills, allegedly in support of the army. this is impossible. here is commercial, and here the state does not exist, commercial or the state. it is now all common russian russian e about the un and why resolutions are being introduced or not worn there on yellow vests, what do the americans endure? yes, they rely on the coalition. yes, trinidad is baga, yes there is belize, yes, there are many more, but they rely to some kind of coalition. they checked the intervention in grenada, relying on kolis that they had a strong barbados there. they needed this is their style, and now russia has a problem with the coalition? yes, there is, belarus, but we know that this problem cannot be postponed until later, who, together with russia, on the basis of what program, where these kpi are absolutely correct csto. i cis other forms. that's

what will happen now, yes, uh, so the very other forms of which russia, uh, can count on its allies, who are these allies? we have repeatedly we ask this question because it is impossible to resist the collective west without leaning on it. well, for a certain union, these are obvious things, and there are countries that are ready to be in this union, while for others, it is necessary to clearly and clearly formulate a program of what they will expect, which, uh, means someone will understand. there is simply no such thing as moscow's policy from some statements. this is a clear, understandable economic ideological military-political component. well, we're right, let's say now there are countries here that just their current statehood. save owe to russia, this is kazakhstan kyrgyzstan tajikistan at least.

residents of the dacha village of markonievo, like all normal people, want to spend evenings watching tv with their families. but the constant interruptions in electricity cause them just anger . here's how it happens look. songs from the bottom of my heart good evening everyone