increase to 789 euros, i'll show you our payment for next year. this is a financial disaster for our family and we definitely can't handle it. i changed the gas supplier, but his monthly amount will also fluctuate around 500 euros. this is insanely big money. and it's just for gas, and i'd love to hear your ideas on what else can be done to help low- and middle -income families get through this crisis. -that moment i'm no longer i can keep it financially, but the answer on what to do with such gaz accounts is given by mariy agnes trakt, zimmerman, chairman of the defense committee. ukraine has been asking for this topic for a very long time, we are not nava, as free democrats, we have been demanding to be sent there for a very long time, the

chancellor was with us at a committee meeting. he answered our questions. he said that he was ready to send tanks only if the americans began to supply their tank, abrams or frenchman and khanala glue clair. we, the liberals , said that it would be better if we after consultations with our partners, let's take the first step and not wait for someone else to do it whether it's a boy, or a girl, i don't know how to determine, but if you're her right, please, but free liberal, calling supplies tanks for tanks are not such liberals, they are part of the us democratic party, of course, a democrat free of conscience democrats. but it certainly helps a lot. this is an unfortunate woman, because these are already the costs that will fall on her, that is, these are all costs. fit on the german budget. this, of course, this will eventually lead to a further drop in the standard of living in germany, so after looking at

all these, the owner of the bakery, york golden baum, came out with paranoia. i am 48 years old. i have my own business our small bakery has 10 employees. i urge you to retire what you are doing here in germany is the greatest idiocy since the end of the war you don't give a damn about small private enterprises. your statement found earlier that shoppers should walk into discount stores for their bakery. and that the bakeries had better close while today calms down shows how high the level of intelligence really is. have you really taken a shower with a hairdryer or combed your hair with a hammer? please do germany a favor. in addition,

they took with them do the same to our country. this is a favor and just go away. thank you, but this is a good german expression. yes, wash with a hairdryer and comb your hair with a hammer. so good expression alexander mikhailovich well, as i understand it, our economy is better than in germany . what the president said to us fundamentally is that he pointed out the need for initiatives. we shouldn't, uh, lull ourselves into thinking that the west is bad, but we managed to endure. the first pressure, on the contrary, is shown today, and in his speech in his discussion, that everything that is done today in the economy requires an order of magnitude more, and i am very glad that today the government understands this and is doing everything possible to mobilize the economic and economic community . well, let's take a look with you. what is the first thing you need to

do today? we stand on the eve of acceptance budget, of course, the budget is a serious document that reflects the goals and objectives. we analyze what we have and develop, but look what the forces say. he says that uh security russia's economic or financial security lies in the fact that we must live through and walk with outstretched hands. well, you know, today it looks extremely, provoking such a statement, what does it mean by a means and not to walk with an outstretched hand, we must set ourselves much more important tasks today, which include the creation of such a credit monetary policy that provides breakthrough movements to the west. we will not return to the economic model that was to be realized by all, the government, for the most part, this consciousness ensures breakthrough movements forward. we i meant that what was with the west. we will not have these relations today. so i returned to the forum in vladivostok, all the countries that were represented there want to cooperate with

russia, no one is betting back today, but with the other side to move east, to offer their economy, to offer the ruble. we must provide it with a mass of commodities , after all, what is inflation, inflation, i repeat, and so i would like to highlight two definitions of inflation, which is the definition of inflation, which is given in the law on the central bank. this is an indication that constant growth is taking place. and we need to fight this, but this is not a completely correct definition of inflation; it is a classic definition of inflation, which speaks of an imbalance between the commodity money supply and today our government is focused on solving this problem. the central bank must be involved in this work in order to avoid dual power in the country. it should be engaged not in inflation targeting, but in strengthening the ruble exchange rate and assisting the government in the implementation and preparation of a new credit on financial policy. this should be done by the one center. and this is the government. i think that the central bank has done a lot

and today it can turn on its potential and provide work. he shouldn't exist in parallel. it does not have to be independent, as written in the constitution of the bodies. today, under the current conditions, it should become an integral part of the government's financial economic policy further. if you yourself are talking about what awaits us in the near future, then first of all, this is an emphasis on our own economy, when we say that the ruble is not just a reserve currency, it is an accumulative currency, which means that it will only be if there is a necessary amount of goods that will be in demand for west, but no one will. look, today we signed an agreement with china 50% rubles 50% yuan, well, the order is fine, but we want more, but when rubles are in demand, we will never impose rubles. and when we give, then the amount of marketable products or services that will be in demand, and then our rubles are needed to buy our goods and services. but this is understandable thing dmitry there are ideas that dmitry

repeatedly promotes, that pricing is needed, that it was ruble right. we have to focus on our own moreover, if we promote our products, of course, the basis should be ruble pricing, but we are talking about something else, that today in international cooperation and thank god that the euro for today there are other forms of cooperation and other institutions, which allow us to talk about the common currency, which can be formed. i do not know what it will be, it will hardly be pure, yuan, pure rupee, pure ruble. it will be something. they are combined there, but ours will definitely be there. presence, based on our potential, primarily in the production of goods and services, when we look at the expectation of the west of the entire west as a whole, or the western countries of western europe a of the whole world in relation to russia, we see that these are colossal expectations. why are all the centers of influence that exist today, it doesn’t matter whether it concerns chips or something else, uh, uh created a fake idea in us that uh, this can be done only in a separate, taken side. yes, nothing of the sort. this is a natural reaction. e market

economics of monopolization. it was an artificial formation of a route known to corporations that specifically, but narrowed the market in order not to have a consumption market, but to produce for this market, and we are able to overcome it all on our own, but for this he repeats himself. we must move to another form of financing, without collateral. we must again fight this fake that our business is ready to be stolen before yes, it is ready to produce, and it proves with its current participation in economic processes, that he is able to do this. therefore, it is necessary to finance the economy to the maximum extent possible, based on the needs of projects, not based on budget restrictions. the budget is what we consider our income and expenses, but besides this, if anything, the state has huge opportunities, because today, the main misconception is that when we talk about long-term state, we confuse the concept of there is an external state debt, when and in our history in modern conditions. we

took money mutually from foreign countries. we take foreign currency. we paid interest there. we were obliged to return, because the two legal entities are different, when we talk about the internal process, the state cannot be indebted to itself. it's just a convenient form of debt fixing, so domestic debt can be large and can be related to the amount needed to keep the economy going. this state should by itself if it sees the need to develop some areas. it should be as much as possible so we are now each to ourselves there will be millionaires, but you just run with these millions and buy matches for them, so let's talk with you that this should not be spontaneous, but under the control of the government, because it should not be. if there is planning, if we understand, he releases. we, i do not propose to throw in an unlimited supply of money, which means that we are constantly. well , of course, we must extend the strategic directions for ourselves. well, how to raise the aviation industry without maximizing

investment in this industry and all all industries, which all of us with our friends have invested in recent months. a wild amount of money in the production of copters, that is, they are all chinese -made body armor. although we produce so much of this that it would seem enough to formulate the purchase of the entire form of the card, yes, that's all. why can't we do it ourselves, we have to invest in it. and when i call the profile discipline says, yes, we do a wild amount. formulate a single order, it turns out that here comes another strange moment of imbalance, but procopter. i think we do not, but body armor and other necessary quantities, when we talked about easy aircraft modeling. why was there in russia, when he spoke about planning, we understand that there is planning and production and consumption , an imbalance should not be allowed and this process must be controlled, but look, today we have accumulated a huge currency, again a lot of questions arise. we hear from the ministry of finance. let's translate yuanite. yes , what a nightmare, firstly, it should be the

national currency, china, when it does not allow just like a dollar, for example, quickly part with it. this this is the first second inflation. yes, it doesn’t matter if the dollar is the euro today, but who is responsible in the ministry of finance or the central bank for annual inflation, if we say 8% excuse me, multiply eight percent by eight percent. take from the projected $500 billion . how many do we have there? if we lose money , no one will be held responsible. and why don’t we massively purchase for this amount, at least now massir to purchase production equipment for the areas that we need. i generally need to restrict exports. this is ruble pricing. look, it's all possible. and do not think so that we all need money just like that, and even the europeans will sell it. there, through parallel imports, but that's not the point, it's important that we don't rely on changes today. just storing the currency of money in another currency. but this is wrong in our economy, which is not

saturated with money. we have a saturation of the money supply of 50%. unlike america 70 europe 120 china 200%. and then the government understands this and today we just need to just make sure that the central banks of the government work together, but we have problems. putin said that we have potentially 234,000 people in limbo. yes, and putin said that on the other hand. here we have laid the foundations for the growth of the people. so we need to create jobs. it’s necessary, including, moreover, mine with these investments, we will also attract the jobs of others, they will come to us, they will come to us. well, who will come to us. now i don't know hello the economy is the economy, but they are frankly strangling us. now they will choke us on the gas ceiling, although only three countries supported this idea, the majority spoke out sharply against it, or some said, if we drive a gas ceiling, then for all gas suppliers. to which the americans

were told that they would go off in this feeling. come who are you what determines, but the situation is something serious. sanctions for a long time do not sit out the problem is big, so move on. of course, you need to be tough and fast andrey, well, the sanctions will be until will not be won victory in the cold war victory in the cold war means the defeat of the enemy. as it was in the first cold war and the destruction of this enemy, his departure from the historical arena, so we must count on this, that the sanctions will be until then. as long as our enemy is alive, respectively, the united states but we are with him even the united states no nato, so when you talk even economically, when you talk about nato, you talk about american tools, because it can become impudent only when it is under the us nuclear umbrella. now , if it were you who did not have an umbrella, remove this umbrella. i don’t think i should have sent it, even if i would have sent a cartridge to

ukraine, because i would have known what was waiting for them, and insofar as there is, the united states is the american me. weapons and this creates a constant, that is, it rises half of zelensky today, absolutely, to be honest, he said we have our territories without america, we can’t return zelensky, they just understand directly, who is the boss in the house, alexander mikhailovich, you don’t attack me offended? yes, but i will tell you when the state duma starts complaining about the fact that some minister is doing something wrong there. listen, according to the constitution, you are equal to the executive branch. call this minister. oh so you call your appointee and ask native what are you doing? listen, the country is at war. do you understand or not? you see, then the people will understand you. here i am people yes, here is an ordinary one, what is called an employee, here i have a lot and i also don’t understand a lot. you know when we have. yes , there is a president and there is an executive branch. i am

i understand the ministry of foreign affairs, yes, they have. they carry out diplomatic activities, in some cases. can you criticize them for doing this? so, well, with diplomatic etiquette and much more. well, the american congress, for example, does not feel itself limited in anything. they consider themselves free to accept any any resolution declare russia a country for terrorists, and they are told, damn it, guys, you can’t do this. it will be hard for us diplomats to work there. well, the american congress is looking at this, and i am surprised by the position our thought in this sense, the same in economic policy liked the fact that we so terribly sat down there, the baltic states, latvia again, our gas is obtained. here's nothing nothing absolutely personal understand? where does our fuel and lubricants come from in ukraine? yes , of course, where else do you read the reports of the institute for the study of war in australia well, there is such an office of the

united states, it is clear that it is oriented, but now they are the last reports for the eleventh, but in ukraine there was a turning point in the war, this is the turning point, so to speak , launched an offensive, which, in fact, we constantly talked about this, it is clear that war is a complicated thing and it is difficult to trust it only to generals from this place with a completely outlined agreement, but war, perhaps, uh, the onset of the retreat of the tide ebb, but here, too, it is necessary have a clear enough goal. here every time it is for this goal should change. i think that now it’s time to talk not about some kind of decication, but from what we stand for, only the interests of the interests of only two regions, and we have these two, firstly, more regions already more regions are occupied by russian troops, they need to be encouraged, because the ultimate goal is clear that if we fight with the united states, then the ultimate goal is to defeat the enemy in this territory, and defeat the enemy in this territory. this is

only the displacement of the enemy and the destruction of the forces that are operating there now have just begun to encourage. oh, you know, there are crossings on the border there are crossings through which there will be food, fuel and lubricants, and that's it. the rest is clear that strikes on these objects. here in this audience it has been said many times that there is an operation, there is a war. yes, war, it involves a strike on individual territories, and we have no laws and rules of war established by international conventions. in this case, it is only advisory in nature, if it is possible not to strike, this possibility has disappeared. but here's something about the baltics. why can't we understand that now this reserve is considered very active for natoy for the united states, because this is the flank that hangs over russia why is this an active reserve? we are actively feeding, you understand, not to turn this asset into a liability so that the european union

, in addition to this woman who has received bills, will receive even more bills to support the balts, or they have neither electricity nor food, uh, necessary for the production of products and the like, that is, to make an asset a liability. these are small small steps that bring you closer. yes, they are tactical in nature, but they are of a very important nature. eh, or rather, a very important one is being pursued goals in terms of increasing the time on the european union someone can you explain to me that they are deceiving us the president said that only three percent goes to the poorest. the president said that ours is not given. yes, not less than a third of sports food from ukraine went strange with income. below average speaks with over 40% rich. but the president gave the exact price of 3% the poorest, to

which the americans brilliantly said, and this says the global market is correct market. that's right, we have a rich flight there, and there, therefore, everything is once and therefore the west will eat until, as it were, a historian involuntarily appears in the west soon. it's simple. well, if they don't want to honor the deal, then we have to tell the guys. well, that's how they thought. but i don’t know what erdogan is to us, so there were some considerations. no, well, in that sense, he asked well, that is, he received half of this grain. naturally, but he asks, and we do n’t know what we have, this, how to ask it, yes, they are going to build it in ukraine no, well, it’s just not a question if we switch to such system of relations, you understand that we would not interfere with this name about the house, as andrei correctly says , already recognize these nazi states as nazi states. i'm generally wary. no, it’s not necessary there, it’s not necessary to hammer, you understand? i mean, don't use the sarmatians of the

avant-garde, that's all. i just think we can use it economically. we can safely remove them completely, because involuntary associations arise. here's how historians do it. yes, the second half of the thirty-ninth, then the first half of the forty-ninth year, oh, the fortieth year. the first khalkhin-goal, yes, which was an unconditional victory, and then it kept back all the time , some militarists were in japan. yes, it constantly held them back, the second, like victory in the winter war. it led to the fact that both the german headquarters and the american, by the way, headquarters began to assess the strength of the red army that yes, she won, but the victory was of such a nature that we can now plan military operations against the soviet union, when you talking about impudence. yes, impudence is growing. we are now politically confident and tactical in terms of the economy, for many reasons, we do not want to admit that countries are fighting against us. nato that's the flag for now. no, yes, this can not be recognized.

it can be said that mercenaries volunteers are fighting against us. well, whatever. but they speak in instruments, they can say it at the official level at the official level of the war, no one has declared moreover at the official level, the same biden repeats. i will never give an american soldier in a star-striped fight for ukraine it's understandable that this works for his constituents. it is clear that this works in principle, western propaganda about how they behave, but in that they support ukraine , they win, unfortunately, unfortunately, that's fueling this counteroffensive now is what i see in the west . yes, that's why a prostitute. yes, they are almost already talking about the fact that now they have won. that's why it's really necessary not to change the character special operations. do not think i have never invaded the military realm. this is the political realm. here is the political character. so to speak, this operation

must be changed, that is, it is necessary to speak politically. remember when that's not to have any. an unconditional surrender was announced, which practically, so to speak, cut off all possibilities and negotiations and everything else, the war, acquired the irreversible nature of the victory of one side or the other. we declare unconditional surrender so that germany must mean it, nature of war - this victory will be ours. here, in this case, we are talking not just there, but the annexation of the territory about providing some kind of buffer there or something else. in my opinion. now we are talking about the survival of the country, so it is necessary to change this nature of the special operation , they say that we really liberate ukraine completely, we liberate ukraine and that we will not accept any surrender from this regime, so to speak, on the contrary, not only unconditionally. yes talk to it we will not be a regime, but only sergeevich peskov on this

topic. of course, everything that happens is any action that the military does. the prices of the military operation are reported to the supreme hijacking team. the president is in constant, one might say, round-the-clock communication with the minister of defense with all the military leaders. naturally, it cannot be otherwise, and in the course of carrying out a special military operation, a special military operation continues and will continue until the achievement of the goals that were originally set, we see in currently there is no prospect of negotiation and we continue to note the absence of any prerequisites for such negotiations. well, that's good, no prerequisites. i don't think there will be ads.

i invite you, dear friends, to our next issue of the besogon tv author's program, which will be called, if god is for us, who is against us. i hope you understand. why is our show called that? i look forward to seeing you. i hope it will be interesting. let's translate from clerical, but understandable, everything is not so

scary if there is an instruction.

interesting times, we live interestingly, i spoke about this for a long time, by the way, i remind you that at the very beginning of the special operation. i spoke about the risks and dangers that lie in front of us in response, i received a lot of negativity in this sense, that the grumbler is a defeatist and an alarmist. as they say, well, i think that we must first of all take a realistic look at the situation, calculate it and get away with the worst. in all cases, in my fairly long life, this is

how i always acted; i proceeded from the worst and searched. the possibilities that could lead me to success in this or that situation, it seemed to work out, so i think i’m not saying this out of loratism absolutely, and moreover, it’s today. i , uh, first of all would like, uh, not to give in to any panic in the background. we must admit the defeat that we suffered in the kharkov region, we must admit this, because defeat makes sense when you recognize it and draw conclusions from it. and if this is not done and not acknowledged, then another defeat will result, maybe a much more serious one. therefore, in this sense, i think it is necessary really look at things. it's really. e. the complex situation must be understood that we are fighting a powerful enemy in a certain i am an opponent of the war. i never hid it. and

for me, this is a great tragedy, that this war is taking place between, uh, two really close peoples on the other side. i understand that no one can stop this war, because there is some kind of historical, as it were, necessity in it. here is the need. which side she should be on, she is unknown to us, but we must achieve so that she is on our side because uh, because it is clear that no one is vladimir vladimirovich nizinsky. no western no one can stop this war. this this war can only end in the defeat of one of the parties. and i must say, for us, this is a defeat. maybe really fatal. this, too, must be understood, one must not be ashamed to say it for oneself, not to be embarrassed to speak, but to say so about the scale of the tasks facing it does not mean alarmism. you

do not mean the lack of faith in victory, listen with this point of view could be stalin in the forty-first year, when he turned to the nation to blame alarmists, when he said we lost 70 million, the population, a third of the territories. well, here it is, right. well, let me tell you, this is a serious matter. it is better to blacken it out than to under-blacken it and lose. and we have to win it definitely for me, but definitely. this war is for you in my understanding, and this war is already a war reminiscent of the soviet-finnish war, by the way, 1940, if you remember, when the soviet union asked in finland offered finland part of the territory in order to move the border away from leningrad, this war went down in history as not famous. according to the poems of our great poet tvardovsky, it really was not famous for two reasons, firstly, firstly, in its essence and form . yes, in

essence it was a war of warfare, the first company of the future great patriotic war, because as they say, it was obvious that europe under the leadership of hitler would attack the soviet union and if the border was where it is was at that moment, most likely, most likely by 90%, we lost the pancake. at the very beginning of the war, which would have been catastrophic for us, therefore, in essence, it was a defensive war part of the great patriotic war. this creature of hers was in shape. yes, it poured out that it was considered some kind of aggression on the part of the soviet union, sort of formally. the soviet union well, philane, does not want to change. why should you fuck her? yes, that is, to say how it would have flowed very, as they say, it is difficult for the red red army the army, if anyone remembers, was defeated at first, but then it must be said that it was reorganized,

the command was changed, certain efforts were made, so to speak, to arm the armed forces, the red army was, as they say, the structure was reorganized and later the red army won this battle. i believe that this one of the most important battles was in fact, the great patriotic war, because i repeat, if this had remained the border. there, most likely, we would have lost leningrad, uh, in the first month at all war. it would be a catastrophe for the soviet union which could end up with the most deplorable consequences, therefore, in this sense, analogies. here i personally suggest this taxes, therefore, i think that in this situation. well, yes, apparently, apparently, it is necessary to draw conclusions, apparently, it is necessary to draw some conclusions from the ministry of defense, the armed forces of the russian federation are clearly in my opinion not

ready for such a scale of war, but the armed forces of ukraine were ready. they have been preparing for 8 years. they have been preparing for 8 years. they are 8 years old. they pulled themselves. they have been preparing their population for this war for 8 years. we didn’t have this, but we need to switch to a slightly different mode altogether, because the situation, as they say, is really very, some kind of serious one, at least start with such trifles, how to stop. you on tv american movies it's twist, but yo-mine. well, my. well, i want to say, well, i'm not saying, russia channel one there ntv yes. well, look at all the other channels. well, this is nonsense, it's the same as films in the ussr during the great patriotic war about marita with this one featuring markings. they would spin. they had a good movie germans fun. where do i show this trophy later. here comedy yes trophy fret. yes, show me, but why are you doing this? well, it's humiliating in general, we

talk all the time. we have a small number, uh, the soldier is fighting, so these 170. here they are fighting, and the rest of the party is resting, or something, but in the form he sees this so well, it is necessary. it seems to me that this consciousness needs to be changed a little, because this, it 's just not not somehow dishonorable in relation to those, really soldiers, fighters who are fighting and who do not understand why we are really going here. i myself say so, we translate mosfilm there help everything is wonderful, but why? what ? and what can’t really be provided by the chinese to buy these drones? this is for the army. why why did we do all this in ourselves to produce in ourselves this is what a difficulty? you see, well, i see, well, because in such a war you need, first of all, iron discipline without discipline you can't do it. for this, a certain

reorganization of the armed forces not to serve for a year and not and not, as they say, at least two at least two, as it was in the soviet army and by the way, to return gold watches, by the way, they also understand what kind of army without facts. it’s generally some kind of illusion, you know, to say this, one thing is fine, but to this, because we are now saying, forgive the mobilization, yes, i suspect that it is very difficult to mobilize now. this is what a cropped division is, which in the ussr were with full command staff, i don’t think we have now there is a whole system, this is a subsystem of preparation. uh, as they say, these, that is, the cadre divisions were destroyed as part of the reform of serdyukov's comrades serdyukov, so to speak , destroyed everything the entire institute of cadre divisions 200,000 officers were fired, they started. i'm talking about it. you are probably sergey, i also served in the essence of the cropped division, that is,

the personnel composition was significantly inferior, that is, the officer corps could be quickly deployed. i think, well, actually, we need to prepare for this, because i do not exclude. what could be a direct clash with nato and they rule out. they really evaluate their situation as a situation that they are defeating that we are weaker. if this is so, then they have thoughts that but maybe now they will bring in troops and, as they say, nuclear weapons will not frighten them, because i have said many times not to. this is a complex story of nuclear weapons to fuck. it's not like that, it's just really, so i think that some kind of conclusions should be drawn in this sense from this including, probably, some forces were involved there, young commanders there, i don’t know, this is how they say. well, well, it's already obvious to everyone this is not not this this is this here we know this. well,

military experts know this. yeah, okay, why? i am 70 years old? i lived my life that i don't know something? i served in the army. i know history well, i made military pictures. i studied this case than me. more stupid than some of those who wear the general's shoulder straps, so to speak, no, you believe, why can't i express? i'm sure you need some things, so to speak, we are all interested in the fact that we will definitely win, we have no other chance, but for this we need to understand the complexity and importance of the task. the second point is underestimating the enemy. it is constantly happening and is happening now. well, you are always an american american. well, we must admit that the mortgaged talented military leader. well, you have to admit it. it’s just that you don’t even have to be strategists to see that in general he is a talented man. here, in the sense of military affairs. he comes up with interesting combinations. well, so to speak, it is necessary

admit it. and most importantly, it seems to me, well, this is my personal opinion. they are probably right, somewhere there is a grumbler and an alarmist, but in my opinion. we still need some clarity on the political solution of the ukrainian issue. well, you have to admit. in my opinion, the ukrainian people exist. is it first necessary to admit that they are in the myth, that they have some kind of andromeda nebula that exists? moreover, in this operation, he, apparently, so to speak, also, as it were, receives this myth of his own, which is necessary. here in my opinion. gotta on in the liberated territories to propose organizing an alternative ukrainian friendly state to russia, because we need to attract that part of the ukrainian people who do not want to be russian and leave for russia, but in principle are loyally friendly, but want their own country, but we need to offer them this part i have a

suspicion that many of the ukrainian armed forces, perhaps, will go over to this side, you understand, and this is a moment of controversy. i understand that not fashionable must somehow be attracted to one's side. uh, so to speak ukraine i i remember. is this also bismarck or something, when they austria the battle of sadovaya was the first battle for the unification of germany, when he defeated austria and did not take a vein, they asked him, why didn’t you take a vein? he says she is our task is not to destroy austria, but to make her fall in love with us. you see, it seems to me that without any particular, but still some kind of political prospect for the future of ukraine, too, uh, still quite difficult, so to speak, we see quite strong action in ukraine, and yet there is resistance. and including resistance at the very

grassroots level, so it seems to me that all these moments are important. well, in general, they finished their how do they say this speech or what is it? rather, thoughts are like that right away, well, they are not right away, and i'm talking about this, too, like everyone else. i think, we think a lot and it is clear that we need to do it. understand the scope of this task. and it seems to me that we also talked about this a lot all the time, the desire to pretend that, in general, nothing is happening. in general, this is what it is, but it seems to me that this is already working against us. our people understand, everyone reads everything, everyone is concerned. by the way, everyone is asking everyone, in fact , everyone is hurt by this matter. this is a serious thing. this is a serious thing. we must trust our people, and as they say. he, i see. he's set. he wants and understandably victory, but he wants

certainty in this meaning. there, 170,000 fight to support your idea. we have more than a million in strength in the army. that is, it’s enough, maybe it’s just the army to decide, that is, i don’t know how to switch to a regime there, like they have it is called wartime from peacetime, that is, the collarbone is completely, because 200,000 people, of course, are ukrainians to stretch 2,000 km. they managed to create an advantage, they say they had eight-timers there, and here, by the way, we also say narrowed. yes, and although the nato members directly say what they planned to do, they do not deny the possibility of being laid down, but it’s just that they still participate in something else. but here we know, for example, his last name, but the last name of the people who performed brilliantly, yes, they checked the operation, for example, they took mariupol lieutenant general sieva. e hero of russia here is his last time. there they tried to slander, but he brilliant and the brilliant boss

carried out an operation in mariupol, with fewer people solved the task. therefore, you very accurately say that there are many people who want us. i repeatedly turned to say, let's give the phone. i'm not saying that mobilization is needed, an artist is needed, he says, moreover, i believe that it is just now and needs to be led by people who know how to possess accounting specialties. let's phone here is a common phone number across the country. call your military registration specialty. get retrained there. you will be ready in 2-3 months. more precisely, even here. i just became just the simplest, like, like really needed. volunteers are needed, so to speak, people who want to serve. do you see advertisements anywhere? this one has no social, i apologize for infection in the military registration and enlistment offices. so to speak, the papers are pasted somewhere along the poles, not on television. not on the radio, not in the central press. no, nothing about it, as if

in fact, no one needs military personnel, as if there are so many of them, yes, so to speak, motivation is through the roof. everything is clear, so that does not mean that the population is not worried. listen. eh, this means the goal is not to disturb. in the end, it will e result in the fact that the anxiety will be such that it will not seem enough to anyone at all. no, don’t even turn on a single channel, where there is at least a word there they show other news, where is at least a word about yes? come, as it were, come, so to speak, yes, sign up and so on and so forth you we need. we need you. such and such, so to speak, for someone, such and such things. we guarantee the rest before the notes are glued somewhere there or something, for example, in the kaluga region. it was just work directly with the population. i heard this from the place of people, that is, they, of course, are probably doing the right thing, that they give such advertisements on television, and concretely , military registration and enlistment offices work, they say they work quite professionally. call, the chechen republic is not working, and they are preparing here ramzan

akhmanovich is big, well done, but again, karen georgich, he said, yes, they pumped up the population there for 8 years, of course, and we still have n’t resolved the main ideological issues. all school textbooks were rewritten there. and what about us, there was no preparation for school, but anyway, we are obliged to win. this question is really the existence of our great country and people who are ready to take up arms to go to a large number of really large numbers of media. and i wanted to say the main question. will galkin return or not? and what will happen to vanya urgant is the main question, like, yes, this is a special military operation, and so on and so forth. well, that's me, so i would like to say to him, by the way, to your words vladimir regarding what you said, yes, to become attached. and what does profile mean, deputy prime minister, did you mean the mantra? yes , as he says, here we are, we have all these means of protection being produced, uh, in the required quantity in huge quantities. honestly,

no one. i don't want anyone here, that's not the thing now all, well, a huge number of people are involved in charity work a lot of preliminary funds. i, too, had to create a charitable foundation, but i can say if it's true that a lot of this is being produced, but open, i ask you, a store with russian uniforms. because almost 90% of what people now have to look for chinese or foreign production, where it's all that you produce. well, show me put it in some kind of open access. in the end. i don't know and why you don't have a connection with the military. if there is really a need for what is, as it were , but it is, as it were, not there. and we are forced, as it were, to pay money to chinese manufacturers, who are all sorts of rubbish here, so to speak, in a huge amount of tears. well, i don’t understand, there are some absurd situations that arise. as far as i can understand these absurd situations arise for one reason, someone who has to report the truth to the top does not report it

for no other reasons. you can't be because each so to speak holds on to his place. and here in this logic the absurd situation turns out. one says i do everything. he says that we have everything, but it turns out that in fact this fifth tenth is not enough and they begin to collect it by the bottom of the barrel, so to speak, and it’s okay if they collect their own, they have to buy from the chinese. in the same ones, someone else has other things, but this is an absurd situation. this is an absurd situation. if indeed all this is enough. i don't know, open a free sale or something, or some kind of licensed sale or so on and so forth, well, it's normal, these absurd situations must, as it were, yes, uh, and be resolved. that's the thing, regardless of who is there, what they have to say, and a single correctional center, including now about this kharkov situation, as it were. well , of course, absolutely. this is a serious failure. call it regrouping. whatever you want, if, by the way, if this is a regrouping in the donetsk direction, then demonstrate success in the donetsk direction, then, so to speak,

demonstrate. but what, as it were, in the form of compensation, or why do all this? this failure is more than half a year - this is the first serious success. and moreover, it is, all the more so, as if painful, because this is about the impending counteroffensive of the ukrainian army. uh, in the kharkiv direction, they talked for several months. everyone said, everyone said the ukrainian media western media wrote even when they later, as it were , analyzed the failure of the ukrainian troops in the kherson nikolaev direction, they said, no, this is now the first part and now there will be a second part of everyone was talking about it, as it were, yes, it was clear that there is september 8 as a key date. uh, a meeting of these ramstein people who are coordinating the ukrainian, so to speak, there is a company on september 11, then, uh, so to speak, the election day in the russian federation and the day that, like, as they first wanted, then the referendum was clear that here these symbolic dates. can they use? well, it seems to me, yes, after all, the main goal was, kherson and zaporizhzhya

with these hyped media symbols, kherson big, like a regional center, the situation at the zaporizhzhya npp, this thing is very media understandable for i think that the main thing is that this was the goal and they started it long before that was indicated. yes, in order to be able to do this, take it and then unwind and file it obviously. yes, and here there was success, they were able to repel it, then plan b came into action, as it were, yes, then some kind of success is needed. where it can be reached in the kharkov direction, there is, as it were, a wooded area. it was easier there. now they now they lost a wild number of people, for the sake of this movie maxim do not worry expand. yes, because it is clear that you understand all these words that we spent here, we wore glue, and raisins and that's it. the rest is compared to zaporozhye kherson. this is about nothing, because it’s like all of us are experts, to be honest, how else would i think about 4 months ago to ask some one what raisins are, they will tell you that it’s in such rolls that such

dried berries are found, and now all right experts were glue, as if there were 26,000 people living there, they were pecking. yes seriously no, raisins are a serious place in our zaporozhye a and zaporizhzhya npp kherson, but this is not comparable. there is no situation. you know this, so to speak, just some kind of catastrophic or something in the area. it will inflate the designation of the degree with the internet, because there was so much noise there was glue, glue, that it was so much as if we had really passed, donetsk simferopol sevastopol rostov-on-don. it's not like we brought the minimum. well, you know, how would it be about how unpleasant you go to this ramzan akhmatovich said that we would return everything, and it was your decision to return there. yes, it should be like, well, it shouldn't. with all due respect to kadyrov, no matter how he should say it, and we all the time hear what he said.

residents of the dacha village of markonievo, like all normal

people, want to spend evenings with their families watching tv with electricity. songs from the bottom of my heart to all good evening i'm here at dawn, everyone is watching ruf so, not everyone has run yet.

this should be the strategy and tactics of the army. i'm not talking about how the chechens are the national guard. you see, it says 36 hours, but it turned out, but it turned out that there were 60 guys who

kept on his authority for 36 hours. we create good news good news. even follow the strategy tactics so to speak, yes the whole company. and here, but, as it were, on the issue of the question, how would it be now constructive and conclusions after all, strange as it may seem. i would say it's a failure. yes, as it were, maybe the fact that this happened is even useful. why because it is so obvious that hang noodles on your ears about the fact that everything it’s wonderful to say so, yes, that everything is actually becoming at our maz. if there are no failures, you can, as it were, report to the top that this is such a strategy we have tactics, well, once and when there is a failure, it exposes all these things and forces smart people to make serious radical decisions to change and think about what is generally so say to do. and what is not necessary at night, when something else flew that is the best thing today? same day uh, special military operations require a radical rethink. it's quite obvious, but

that, in general, the whole, as it were, the whole mechanism for building really life in the country requires a search for a more optimal model of support, as it were. here are their delivered. this is also obvious, starting there cinema and culture and ending. uh, ending with the military. here they are, you won’t let me lie, but you hardly remember, but nevertheless, back in the month of march. i remember. so my first trip was just to the border, so to speak, of the belgorod region and in the kharkov direction. i talked with people who were in these parts that went there back in march. so i said here, listen, the border regions should go into real martial law, because back then, guys told me so to speak. listen, we are driving, our convoy comes in, and on the sides there are some kind of incomprehensible filth, so to speak, and they take pictures on these very phones, but they can’t do anything, because according to the law they don’t violate anything. but you think something has changed no no, no, nothing has changed, because how is there peaceful life and at the same time after that we got. the shelling and attack of saboteurs there need to be created not for some

reinforcements. you see, we type, we introduce the plan for hurricanes. there you need to set a line, a defense line of defense in case something happens does not happen. i hope it doesn't happen and well let it be. there should be a line of defense and all decent regions should live in a different regime, maybe with limited mobile communications with limited internet and everything else, otherwise i was told then. yes, no, well, it's too unnecessary. it's not my idea, friends. mine told me about it the military, who left the battlefield. they told me nothing about this - officials, not experts, political scientists, bloggers, shogers, and so on, but those guys who came out of the battle, in fact, so far the situation has not radically changed these conclusions. must make me any doubt. if this is a failure, including a plus, most likely, of course, this question is worth it, as it were, before the concept of the military is here. here, too. we talked about where the cropped parts disappeared, right? in fact, here's the whole military reform that began under serdyukov,

it turned out to be ineffective or not effective enough, they started it then, but in the end, uh, these talks about a small compact army, which, so to speak, are both there and at the same time, and they turned out to be untenable, this concept needs to be rethought. here we are now seeing a problem, as if in ukraine, but imagine a simple thing. well, i would say again, so to speak, yes, i fantasize about the russian federation, our homeland is attacked by conventional means of weapons from several sides at once, so hold on, there and so on 50.000 from kaliningrad to primorye, we can handle it in this case. yes, we have nuclear weapons. this is a serious thing for sure. it allows us to be sure that what is the enemy if he attacks with nuclear weapons, but ukraine shows us how to create a situation in which the use of nuclear weapons is impossible. here you are then, so to speak, to your compact army. get it right on four. doubts immediately arise in five directions, which means that a rethinking of the entire concept of the military

organization in russia as a whole is required. because when we we have seen enough films about american special forces and decided that special forces decide everything, my friends, this is about another war. special forces solve a point problem. and we have the impression that many things have become, in fact, the result. we have been constantly watching hollywood for centuries, special forces, there special forces themselves are all sorts of tricky things and stuff, and ordinary war does not require special forces special forces for this, few special forces do not take the city, special forces do not hold the front line. special forces solve special tasks. americans can afford such a war. yes and not always, because they are on their world island. they can solve precise problems. and in our country, any hostilities take place practically at our home. we have long borders in the world at home , you understand, and this obviously poses other problems. so to say, others in terms of level, which means i don’t know the equipment there fortification and so on, again, i’m on them. i am aware that i’m not a specialist, although

it’s also like, well, something about the military yes, but honestly word, but it doesn't matter. how many years 20 no. no, two plus eight, so to speak, 10. yes, but whatever the meaning the meaning is not in this, the meaning is, the meaning is to say so, yes, what do i say again, if there were only successes, none of us would open our mouths, we would sit in our place and talk about his political science. well, since we are in such a situation, we have to talk about these things. this requires a lot of rethinking. needless to say, many things were not well planned. wrong to say so e reported incorrectly analyzed and so on and what are these e, astrologers soothsayers cash desk fortune tellers. as if yes, they passed it off as reality. this is a big question, a big question, because in addition to everything else, it’s like my specialization in the working space has gone out of hand all these years, it’s bad, and it seems to me that this, among other things, formed the basis for an incorrect assessment of the situation in ukraine. by the way, i don't agree. in this case, i supported something, i don’t support something, i don’t agree

that we should apply some kind of alternative to ukraine, such an alternative was offered to it, since ninety one. all post-soviet existence was a proposal for such an alternative. we gave you a state that you did not have an economy, there was no e, so to speak. yes, he tells me since it was not. now we ask you only one thing, do not create problems for us with the security of the lord, the ukrainians did not have you as a people. we gave you the feeling that you are a people. but instead of using it, they became a military base, so it would be possible to build a neutral state of ukrainians, it would have been possible if there had been no america if there had been no nato bloc, the presence of a nato bloc would not allow us to build any neutral ukrainian state at all, this is absolutely out of the question. well , all these all ukraine are alternative states of alternative states of the dpr lpr - these are alternative states. we offer the same things. the same options were offered for others, in fact, there were such options. although here is my personal opinion. i spoke about these issues many times in

2014 and so on. the left bank of ukraine became would be an alternative ukraine well, there were also a lot of arguments. but yanukovych is there, that is, well, of course, we had to take it by the balls and let him breathe. the problem was that they could not be found, it was necessary to grow or attach some, so to speak, yes gold. yes, listen, they are showing america there, they are not yet stitching the tax like that, yes, so how could it be done. well, that's important. here's what to do now is important to rethink these things and move on and move on. but what else do i want to say. with all this with all this this is absolutely clear. listen, don't spread snot. i would like to say a huge number of people. now, if there had been a telegram in the forty-first year, we would definitely have lost the great patriotic war, in general 100%. all these messengers. mixed networks all these videos. all this is a small pile, in which there is 30% misinformation, 30%, so to speak, just stupid hatred, and 30% chatter. they take out the brains of a huge number of people and without problems. that's the size of the problem. this

size, i tell you again there was glue with all my so to speak, too, bitterness about this . this is not rostov-on-don. and neither belgorod nor voronezh yes, if you do not pay attention to this attention to this problem and pretend that nothing happened, then it will come to rostov-on-don . this is true, but my word of honor so to speak, be men. here are many of those who have now raised a wild hysteria. yes, including patriotic people, as it were, listen to the forty- first year about which he likes to remember everything. here in the forty-first year they put it against the wall and nobody i wonder why it's panicking because you're an ultra-patriot or because you're a traitor or because you're scared you spread panic, it's panic that destroys, so here are many of those who are used to write something all the time. this whole subculture is something happened. i don't know yet what i should urgently write urgently on emotions. but in a good way, yes, so to speak for a man it would be how important it is. heard, find out, gather information. step away from the situation.

move away from her. think, calm down and think and and then with make a decision in general, you need to write something. or don't. you need to say something or you don’t have to, unfortunately, many even very good guys, like, yes, they are addicted to it, like a drug, constant writing reading, writing reading, writing reading, they need all the time. here they are the first to throw out something like that, they create, so to speak, in this way, absolutely mess, which sometimes is of the most destructive nature. look, you don't have to write anything. if you 're really serious about it, it's all from situations. maybe you need to keep quiet at this moment, maybe he will say something in two or three days in a week. maybe something like this absolutely does not mean that she soak what is happening again i say, this is an outright failure. it is necessary to draw conclusions from it to inflate it to the level, so to speak, a catastrophe is just as evil, as it is not to draw conclusions from it, and the last thing i wanted to say about the economy. yes, listen. again, on your own programs, i remember a long time ago, as it were, yes, i'm talking about ukraine. let's try

economic sanctions. well, let's not bring things to war. let's turn something on. to put it this way in terms of the economy, maybe we will at least try to do it, but we still don’t do it. i would like to draw your attention to the fact that we still do not have any sanctions against those who have not been imposed. we did not impose sanctions. we, at best , we, at best, invent that we have leaked, so to speak, we don’t introduce any valves on this very one, in fact, yes, no political separate sanctions have not yet been introduced. we kind of answer, they enter, we answer there, yes, look, we continue to trade with countries with which it is not necessary to trade. here it is a simple thing. we are talking about latvia here, wait on principle. we say we say europe will now be winter. well see many a lot of what we do. we allow them to go through that winter more gently, we create its milder conditions. we continue to trade, we will

maintain logistics at a time when we are under pressure in full program. we continue to create conditions for them so that they go through this crisis more gently, and i believe that these are completely unacceptable people, incomprehensible, these people incomprehensibly support words. this series is serious. i will ask him again a question to ukraine yes, why will i ask the question of electricity in the baltic states again. why did gas go to latvia again? i'm just not going to ask who is to blame for us all comrade taught. the main thing is what to do. and so. let's be tougher and the last phrase itself. no need to get carried away and another geopolitical fantasy. first congressional elections. the united states will not change anything, the second europe will survive the winter, of course, it will survive, the third. there are no conflicts zelen for false , as it were, but it is not worth taking into account. it's all bullshit to be distracted by these things and hope to make some kind of

plans is completely pointless, it can work as a factor, but count on it. yes, we do not work with these facts, including the factors do not work what i can say, the following is counting on the will of the people of courage talent. well, let's focus on the goal and taking into account everything that we see, draw the right conclusions in the shortest possible time. in particular, for this kharkov company. what is the name of the regrouping of troops? yes , the military say that this is called a regrouping of troops. well, let's regroup then. give the result and we will gladly name the heroes. uh, first of all, what is your trouble identifying. enough in the army of one or another type of weapon. why is there a discussion about this at all? there is a federation council there are houses in

each of them has a security commission in each commission should be under the armaments commission in all countries, and it gets what i am from the army from the ministry of defense. how many are supplied of what kinds and does it define it as parliamentary? parliamentary control of power, if there is a division of power, and it determines enough at the level, if it sees that it does not sufficiently understand the issue before the executive branch, it does not report to the people. yes yes yes or no? that is, if it works, you should not have enough question. in an army of one kind or another or not? are there bulletproof vests or not? and what kind of ceramic or ceramic it is, the commission

itself must find out and report. within the bounds of secrecy what is, why and heart reveal reports to you every year? such and such a percentage of weapons in modern non-modern ones there is something else. no , it’s impossible for your commission on spoiling, as far as i know, good military generals commanded the districts. battle generals, they understand this, what is it? how hard is it for me to explain? i don't want to this is flattery, how can it be that you do not know or have an opinion of this in armenia? well, as a rule, we help my army, and the voluntary and corps of the dpr of the lpr are all who volunteer. they also fight. they are also within the competence of these parliamentary ones. each person with a steering wheel, as

demir said, is personal, he is under their parliamentary control, sometimes exists for this. the first is the law, he makes the laws the second. he controls the power of parliamentary control in this his sense of everything else is already. deal with what happened and that their how to treat it in the first place. again, a remark, if people search the internet, if they are ready to listen, for any message, it means that they lack information. so the one who has to, who gives them information, doesn't give them enough information for them to believe it. and if the non-genus is then still different, and if there is no information and the mother, then they are serving anyone , because the people know, and therefore the information should meet the needs of no.

the desire for the need of the population to know what is happening, especially there, especially at this moment and you need to be built in such a way that they believe it, and they would first of all tell this information. they are what someone writes on the internet again. this is how it works. well, i'm speaking from experience. i am not speaking on the basis of something that is theoretically knowledge and excellent, while you used to say that if the fog of war and that a number of information should not come in something of your dissatisfaction, any information passes military censorship, well, it happens, well, just an important addition, because without this we have no one to say that no one says so that the correspondent, so that everything is reported, we will not go through censorship. it is forbidden every frame every word

every message should be. as for what happened, but if you look deeply, first. return do not know what kind of army you have? do you know that you have 12 armies? 12 armies, someone here said, framing, 12 armies you have one tank shock and plus one, a corps, which is almost an army. this is a huge force, there is no such thing in any country. these armies are designed to fight and 12 armies in russia they were created, they were created they armed themselves to resist nato because every army is built in order to resist the main enemy, which is against which you have to fight. and with all the claims

that we have, we can pull out the military budget. less than ten percent of the american and on this military budget, russia succeeded out of thin air. well, what happened in 2000, i don’t know, can you imagine what what what kind of disaster was in the army. to create superbly strategic nuclear forces that are superior to the us managed to create those types of weapons which are superior to almost all that are. with this miserable money despite everything that was, despite everything that was in these 20-odd years, despite those ministers of defense who were, despite the corruption that was and is still there. although it has decreased, but it is. for this money to create such an army, which is

a miracle. you should be proud of this. because we once had a minister of defense, a former team man. he said that our problem is that we do not turn into an army that has a state. at i tried all the time to have an army in the state, but the state had to build the economy, then it was necessary to build it. the industry had to be developed. and your state is poor in international mans? with all the claims , with all the wishes, yes, so that everything that is needed in the army is great. reality was it possible to create such an army out of this reality in 22 years? how is it today? i think no one but russia it will.

therefore, having fair wishes, it is still a classic. enough respect what happened at the front? very few people know what war is. what is pain? even fewer people were in battles, especially in commanders. in armavir armored personnel carriers, when is the situation there inhuman? don't you know anything? complete uncertainty you get dozens of reports per minute you have to evaluate them. you don't know what's happening to your troops, frenzied tension nervous dynamics? there is no such huge thing, nowhere ever, so that there are no mistakes. i have seen

such errors. i have seen dozens of such errors. and at us in all the battles there were mistakes that excellent commanders make, but they accepted what to do? this is a war of complete uncertainty. and it doesn't have to be like that. it is natural to judge sharply even those officers of the generals who made mistakes. it's not an automatic. there are no perfect people. no ideal military is not a computer, he is a living person. he was tired, he had not slept for three days. why hadn't he slept for three days? he may be wrong. and when he finds an error, if he finds problems, and

what was really? in certain areas your command did not calculate that the ukrainian units there could create numerical and fire superiority and considered that those units that cost them enough, because there is no real threat from the ukrainian side, an erroneous decision. they made a mistake they made a mistake the ukrainian army managed to concentrate more military forces in two or three sectors than expected, using its numerical military superiority to them. managed to break through these. what was the team to do? there are several dozen fighters there, how many hours do they have

fight have weapons? and the help is not suitable, because they did not have time to organize themselves, they were not ready, they were ready, because they took into account what to do. another hour the cartridges will run out and then it is necessary to withdraw people. and so they retreated. with all those cases of heroism and everything, but there is a limit when you can resist superior fire. if you are an opponent when you don't know where the blows come from? the fact that they did not organize themselves in time did not prepare the possibility of transferring reinforcements at the right time. yes, this is a mistake. do not calculate the front big. they didn’t do what they needed, then they need the attention of a mobile tank unit

that could be used to transfer to the desired area during the reinforcements of the war - this has been several months. she is not maneuvering no maneuvering. so they decided that it was not necessary, because there was not enough strength. you never know how the army determined the forces. not an army, she said that we don’t need any more, there are troops. it's already been said by other authorities that you don't use more than you have. and with the fact that it was so they distributed. we'll have to revise it, but in those places where it was possible ukrainian troops break through positions. so what? what is the problem during battles, when the enemy breaks through the front, is not that new units of new divisions will break into this breakthrough and then they will

crush it. and here this is not the case ukrainians have brought new units, they have happiness only to break through and advance. well, send there, and who should i? that is, the miscalculation was not in that. that ukrainian troops will not attack in this place with superior forces, but from a military point of view? it 's decided meaning. you will lay down your troops, you break through the front. and then what do you have no one to send there? so what is the military meaning of this? you kill your soldiers. it turned out that it was the creation to take this step and distribute it to all the

peacefulness of its population for the ukrainian command enough they are ready to put thousands of their soldiers. and they put them down. but this does not give any military success. on the newspaper page, right? what they put in the kherson region, well, they penetrated. they went there for 10 kilometers later, well, there is no place. they have troops to send no, everything they had they put into the strait of the breakthrough. almost the same now near kharkov when is kharkov a secondary front of the third degree? they don't have troops to send across this gap to attack the russian troops in the north, who are just in the donbass. that is , the irresponsibility of the ukrainian

military command was not taken into account here. mistake, right? mistake i remember before the yom kippur war once we had a thesis at the school of officers in intelligence before graduation. how how did the egyptians start the war was for a year? and there, when they planned, i suggested, i say, but they came out. there were so many paratroopers, so many ten battalions. they should land them not on the initial course, which was then the commander of intelligence, the head of the rank of the case of the division in which he said this could not be. i say why say? they don’t throw out a landing force if the troops cannot approach it within 24 hours, because they have all the ammunition for 24 hours, if the troops do not

approach, then they will be destroyed. says no army does this egyptian, the army is will do. they don't care about their soldiers. and their paratroopers died. they were shot down by tanks, but they went for it. that is, there is the same mistake in military tactics - you do not do this. you don't throw soldiers into hell without having some sort of success they can. that is, they did not take into account the degree and inhumanity of irresponsibility in relation to their army to their soldiers. contrary to all that they say, but russian. so now the problem is gone, what's the problem? in those places revision in those places where such the danger of creating an advantage will be strengthened and strengthened. these

places will add people, add mobile mobile units that can be transferred, if necessary, to one sector or another, and assemble a whole offensive for a new attack, which will be soon. very soon, and it will be completely different than it was planned by the russian army and it is still going on. that's where they're in big trouble. so calmer and more balanced and with more respect, treat these soldiers.

how many are there? more than one of their cavalry will trample the rest. people heart of parma soon

and one more thing about this lady from germany, your words, yes to god's ears. my words are just my experience and that's it this lady from germany she doesn't know what the bundeswehr is. there are no tanks. they can scrape together less than 200 tanks. if he makes a frantic effort to restore their combat capability, there are no more. and which of the two? oh, the lambord, which is not, well, no, well, there are no tanks, even if everyone went inside correctly and correctly correctly.

without technicians, well, he fights a tank in one day of fighting. after that, they must be dealt with, otherwise he will not he will go, otherwise he will not shoot, that is, it is impossible to create this entire base. it takes time, it takes about six months at least with tankers. i know we had tanks among them on others. i know what it's called. therefore , there are no tanks in europe, neither the french, nor the british have the united states, and now the united states will be built now. two huge armies ukrainian and polish they will

arrange them for several years in 5 years. they want to create a huge tank army there, armed with the latest tanks. for two reasons, others are not capable of using the latest artillery and large air forces on modern american aircraft, and the second will give money to the vc. and you need to understand what the west is striving for now. quickly opposite, which you are fighting, she has a limited economic potential, a limited face potential, and a limited military-industrial complex potential. here the entire military-industrial complex of the united states and all financial capacities will replace both ukraine and poland with what the country needs for the war. they will only say

let's go soldier. we don't want our soldiers. we will take the poles, we will take the ukrainians. we will form combat-ready divisions on the most modern weapons from them. it will be a huge fist against russia from the east. to threaten russia from the east and keep russia if this fist fails to break from intervention, when will the main war of the united states begin? how much time do we have, and 5-7 minutes, how much time do we have ? does russia have time? i will say so. here it would be correct. what is the difference between special your military operation. a special military operation it can be ended, whenever by ordinary agreement, the war ends with surrender, the goal of the

war is defeat, the enemy's arm is the destruction of the enemy's combat capability. if for sure, then up to a decade, a special military operation. her goals are limited. we have time until america creates these two armored vehicles already signed contracts for 150 tanks 5 years they want to create. and how much time is it decided by the russian military leadership, and in our country, uh, is there a goal for the leadership destroy? to defeat the ukrainian army and to never have the territory of ukraine a threat to russia or reach some kind of intermediate agreement for an agreement, a special operation is needed to destroy the enemy, a war is needed. dmitry i about 5 minutes was funny. yes, i will

try to make the picture a little wider, because it is clear that, of course, we are most worried about what is happening in our southwestern direction. here, uh, the picture, however, is much wider. in my opinion. ah, and then, by the way, speaking these here, this is a small deviation from the baclia, which for me personally is also very tragic precisely because of the fact that the liberated territory of the liberated people was left, but, nevertheless, it would become even smaller, despite the fact that, of course you need to pay attention to this. well, first of all, the doors of the brand are still gender-based recognition of the presence of the ukrainian people, a big mistake that existed in our soviet history. we ukrainianized by force the russian people who were there. you see, i was as a small child with me, i was visiting kiev, outweighed russian inscriptions, kiev, kiev, no one spoke at sea, outweighed the nato ones, and television began to talk about years of praise, this is all a marxist did. well, that

is, there is no ukrainian people ukrainian people. no, you will be told any story, any historian will tell you that it does not exist. it can be called it can be called the ukrainian folk medical written the nationality of ukraine in this column, its nationality was not even in tsarist russia. i am mark well? there are little ones. there are such little people, indeed. who are the little russians, shorter than a certain territory, moreover, you understand that as soon as recognition begins, but let's recognize, it will be possible to capitalize with it. actively. it is interesting to eat finns. yes, there is coverding, so to speak, appropriate. you don’t, as he said, there he is, but what we definitely don’t have. this is the correct view of the matter. listen to the story just recently was and how who the very, very latest story was that as soon as

we started to say to them back under soviet rule guys and you are a whole people with us, so to speak, the national leninist policy and these same nationalists, by the way, ukrainian ones immediately crawled into the regional committees, and they ruled the ball in the communist party of this very means, respectively, ukraine approximately the same situation took place in belarus. and here are the black and white and yellow-block flags. where did these peoples come from, all the flags of collaborators, the first and second world wars to recognize the existence. thank you i refuse. well, what about politicians? i agree with sergey alexandrovich here. the only thing that is not necessary, of course, is to overclock everything via internet channels and so on. well, you know what's the matter. here it is often referred to. here is the great patriotic war situation. in my opinion, completely different, but the great patriotic war. solo-inford, the bureau rarely informed clearly when information about the most terrible failures was left by the soviet troops for a day, the city of kharkov was left first in the forty-first year, then, when the catastrophe began under

kharkov, forty, the second also reported the money. and therefore, strictly speaking, rumors. that's when it was possible to pursue all these paneers. well, because the sable forms the bureau with all that, the most severe military censorship. informed the people as they told the truth. this is about this situation, the soviet troops did not regroup in the kharkov region not in the forty-first not in the forty-second year our troops left, the city of kharkov says, and then there was victory but after all, uh, with whom we are waging war, and what's happening? i am i understand that the ukrainian direction is one of the directions of this big war of the big cold war can be called a geopolitical technological economic war? and here, of course, our adversary is not the united states in the united states in different configurations participated in our history. it 's a combined scent. this is really this is a configuration with its own ideology, which, by the way, in the united states,

far from everyone shares this with their idea of ​​the economy. by the way, that's why processors in memory is produced in one place for it in another. so here are the resists in the third, between the water division of labor, it was not the americans who came up with this. although maybe they are on the passport. some of them were the americans who came up with the global bosses, for whom the guys from oklahoma or the guys from near london well, this is rubbish, the most important thing is their power. here is our main enemy, therefore, if the united west falls apart. this will be a complete analogue of the collapse of the soviet bloc in the 90s and the collapse of the soviet union, so russia has survived. but as can it fall apart? i think that this is what sergei alexandrovich said that europe will survive the winter. i also think it will survive, but in the twenty-third year the question that there is no single west as a single policy will become very serious. for example, a an order came to set a ceiling on the purchase of russian oil. and

some even british authors referred to the fact that putin’s ultimatum was that i would not sell his oil anymore, but i think that’s not the point, they perfectly understood that after a rather long period living together a single currency a single harmonization of one european bureaucracy. they realized that they have different balances, they cannot set a single ceiling on oil. so they would put themselves in step, they ordered the authorities to do it, but they realized that they had a discord at every level. they can radically establish this ceiling because, on the one hand, they need to limit oil consumption, and on the other hand , they still need to subsidize a certain level of this consumption, and in each country this level turned out to be different during this winter in the twenty- third year. this difference is getting bigger and bigger and bigger, and in the end, everything that is happening in our southwestern direction is being done at the expense of the destruction of europe. europe is not aimed at destroying prices. if you do not agree with this concept, simply its resources are burned in the same way as they are burned. unfortunately, the russian people who are on the front just got their brains pumped like that, and we know

examples from history that you understand with these brains, no one else saw, so to speak, the germans from the frg than the east germans. it was possible, of course, to recognize the existence, so to speak, the existence, so to speak, of the west german and east german people, but so this war, which is now being waged in all areas of the economy, production technology, logistics. and yes, and a special military operation is called a war. well, military operations are underway. i think that it is necessary to approach this very simply in the modern world, there is nothing for conscripts and amateurs to do. it's only this foul last hope. go back to the soviet system of the army, so to speak, which, from a particle, ruined the course of the afghan company. this should all be done by professionals. yes, there is no need to panic , you need to understand that the miscalculations that were made in so many areas. for example, in the field of

civil aircraft buildings, the engines of the structure. and including during the kharkiv campaign of this very company of a special military operation - these are miscalculations, from which conclusions should be drawn by professionals. and if the professionals allowed mistake, negligence or something else or is in its place, professional conclusions must be drawn. and on each site is carried out exclusively professionally. i think it 's professionalism. that's what it is. the most important task for us now. well, ha. by the way, i suggested you me, sorry. i somehow together, and the ukrainian language is the ukrainian language traveled, whoever has ukrainian limbs, he designed to a large extent. let's be honest, including, as it were, even words in the southern russian dialect, by the way, put it in textbooks for a very long time. to the dacha, well, are you talking nonsense? well, as

literature, absolutely set the task of russian let's do it. and so to speak, set the task. a year later, we will make the north russian language there, the ural and far eastern dorofeevs in secret. approximately this is how the italian language appeared, there was a whole institute that was engaged in refining the sound, but listen, if we are, if we are now like this on this occasion, then i can say so that, as of entry, there and ukraine into russia, and by the way, speaking from the ussr into the ussr, this so-called language was spoken by an absolute minority of the population, which is now in the territory in modern it or not, but in the fact that it was imposed artificial, as it were, but now, if you name was hebrew, in general there are constructed languages, the question is not in this. me simply are or not. but when we

say no to ukrainians from the outside, but you will agree, in my opinion, this is not very correct. from the outside. why so wait it's water nationalism? so simple you can't just you can't you can't why do this? i don't want to label now. i'm completely different. well listen, well let's state the truth, of course here, in my opinion, not professional. i am not a philologist. well, of course, languages ​​have their richest literary traditions, when there were no petrarchs. i am aware of my richest tradition. that's right , he has some sort of literary one. well , okay. i’ll tell you myself now that shevchenko is a kobzar and what was written on the cover, but nevertheless, the language still exists, but it was ruled even when what he himself wrote, again, they denied it. the state level would have been for

discussion, we did not deny this before, we resigned ourselves to artificiality. now you weren't against it. just now, when we are being listened to, i just want to understand, well valentina ivan matvienko and what should i say? i'm not all ukrainian, but a ukrainian rodiono-miroshnik, which is not a ukrainian, a ukrainian. listen, when we resettled ourselves, some people wrote that they were elves, this is a constitutional right, this is a constitutional right. let's still be correct, they have ears of a different shape. those who have ears related to the country have the same ears, if the ukrainian dialect of the russian language suits you, no, because well, i'll explain why, because it's not very correct, let's leave it to a philologist. well, let's say, polite, they say, it's not at all correct. and this is an ideal option, both from the standpoint of great russian chauvinism. lost a lot of friends. another one works, yes, who settled down the following will say. the mustache of a belarusian will say, and we also do not have a language. and

if you look longer, so to speak, you know, and actually polish. if you look at the dialect too. and if you look, that is, yes, serbian , then something developed from staroslav. well, therefore, listen, there are no questions to comrade stalin, he was comrade socialism to exhibit knowledge was linguistics, you know. i wanted to make the question of language clear. it's not about chauvinism at all. here the point is precisely the issue in the great russian civilization, which has always had a lot of nationality in a different way. are we ukrainian and the culture of the ukrainian language and the ukrainian part of a large russian civilization, of course, of course, is, but they do it, on the contrary, the statement about the presence of the ukrainian people is not so. understand the prisoners who were taken in the first days, so to speak, of special special military operations. what were their last names? there, at least 90% ended, they were turned over by the petrovs, sidorov, and like that of

course, of course, nothing and that’s it, with this stuff, this time actually started, because in fact. and there is no question which is not in russian chauvinism, here the question is in ukrainian nationalism. let's first encourage the bolsheviks, and then we don't have the nazis at first. here, turn. as soon as they began to return, bender was even more addicted to it, but it should be noted that at first all the same astroven, says this topic, the active development of the problem. all this problem is only one in the center of ukrainian statehood put the idea that ukraine is the meaning of her life, the struggle with russia . that's perfect. if it takes away everything else can be taken well. want there language there, anything. the main thing is to speak french. yes, i would not like us to start this discussion at all, because it is absolutely not about anything. for me, it is absolutely destructive; it will not lead to anything good, except for

opposing one against the other, and so we are already standing. so excuse me, i don’t have a birth certificate in two languages ​​anymore. the ukrainian language is now the ukrainian language, it’s melodic. his language and who will tell me, another here just doesn't understand anything. i'm not defending ukraine now. i'm just saying, come on, we won't come from war to back to war of zyuks, put that aside. let everyone speak the language he likes. it has nothing to do with nationalism. nationalism is a little different. but when dima i'm sorry, we start talking like this, then we imagine that there is a text of 30 million that are left. well, if they speak ukrainian, then they are all bandera. well, what about man? well, you're about. why so it is simply not necessary to distort what he offered to all the peoples of russia so to speak. just do not just raise this topic in context. completely different matter. this is serious. we are now talking, in fact, the war is this war. we are speakers, we

are talking about the war, they initially planted a bomb with this very ukrainian language , they said nothing about the language. i said that it is different, which means that there is some kind of special statehood there, which is a bomb. ready-made statehood is generally separate. this is generally a separate issue. you are one language and several states in history. i just know that it's very easy, as a person who knows what the fifth count is, like a couple of other people who are in this studio. i know very well what a painful feeling it is when they begin to, uh, think of you as someone else. you are now not a ukrainian in ukraine tell me, i lived in ukraine for 20 years of my life and from there went into the army. i know what ukrainian anti-semitism is. i know what ukrainian nationalism is. and you tell me about it please don't tell. well, i don’t want you and we now to arrange a fight against the ukrainian language out of this. well it's complete. let 's not want this topic, i don't want it, because for me

it smells of nationalism. that's it, i've said my word. now i want to say something else, to join what sergey said that karen georgievich said about hollywood films. well, i know that i don’t watch russian channels there, except for solovyov life and rtr and russia, so it’s hard for me to say, but when i i watch from vodka and watch videos that come from the fronts and hear the hollywood audio track. i have a feeling of deep resistance, that is, the video that delivers from there where the blood of the crixtons explosions gnash. and all this is accompanied by some kind of hollywood man, then it turns into cartoons and those people who watch, of course we say, why do people panic in them, of course there will be panic, because they watch they don’t have the feeling that this is reality they feel like it's all made up reality shows some stormtrooper that goes there comes in some peak around the gap and at this

time boom-boom-boom-boom hollywood music goes on, what kind of nonsense is this, who does this kind of thing ? serious people write this and imagine serious channels, behind which, including kura, you want to make a beautiful picture or you want to present and show what is really happening since 2014, the topic of my speeches in the bundeswehr. they changed, they began to ask me to ask, to talk about what is happening in ukraine and i at the very first lecture, i brought a film there. in my opinion, i have already talked about this, where specifically a person’s leg is torn off as a result of a rupture, there blood is injected into him with promedol, all this is happening there. donbass everything, i showed it. when i showed it to the bundeswehr. they were horrified, i then followed the lecture. i asked. and why is it so frightening - you are military, but no one showed us this. that is, those films that were shown to us and that were made to us. these were educational films. e, for the most part created. uh, some instructors

who believed that the psyche of the military in this way. and you can’t, you can’t inflict any damage. and this i just mean that when a person, including a military man, does not see and does not understand what is happening, this is again about hollywood, then we distort this picture in people's heads, a completely different feeling is created. and i just think that this is what we sergey said there, a million, telegram-telegram-channels. this, of course, is not bad, probably, but i reviewed some part of these videos there, it is almost all the same thing goes with music. everything comes with some idiotic comments instead of showing some dry chronicle and about the video. now. i will turn to the germans and to german affairs. he posted a picture here recently. remember the first time there was a berba. uh, in ukraine, in my opinion, it was the first time. and now she stands in horror, how would she have such a sad face, she stands in the background. e of a car that was

blown up by a russian mine, either with less, or with a shell. well, in general, such a picture, in general, when we carefully analyzed this picture, which went all over the german press, we found that it turns out that she is standing in the background of a car that has a driver's door, it's not hers, it's the door that was taken from the passenger seat and it is presented as a driver's seat. that is, this is a 100% fake, which was used by the german media, among other things, in order to talk about the atrocities about the russian army. and hmm, i don’t mean that the germans create it. and this is all being done. i'm just to the point that, unfortunately, i i saw here a lot of channels, a lot of organizations that are engaged in exposing these fakes. well, it seems to me that such fakes, in which the minister of foreign affairs of another country is involved, should be dealt with not at the level of telegram channels, but at the level. relevant organizations that can recognize it and can see it. where there are arguments every day about what

they'll be watching today, let's drop in on them and find out how they deal with it. quietly someone is in favor of watching cartoons tomorrow today we are watching news, then the series 3 minutes before the commercial, where no one ever swears. after all, everyone has a watch application that you can watch anywhere on anything. and most importantly, whatever. i also have a look. it is always interesting how it

all begins now you will see everything. manufacturers of good things want and but it is best to check.

well, a few words about the lady, sonurman. i can't pronounce her name the way you do. well , actually, she doesn't have a middle name. she has only a double surname. uh, the thing is, when we are talking about free democrats, then we must be well aware that virtually all wars and all actions involving the german.