well, a few words about the lady, sinur. murman, i ca n’t pronounce her name, patronymic the way you do. well , actually, she doesn't have a middle name. she has only a double surname. uh, the fact is that when we talk about free democrats, we should be well aware that almost all wars and all actions related to the participation of german troops. the e

german paragraph of the sphere, since 1990, took place with the silent and loud e assistance of the free democrats genscher, who was the minister of foreign affairs. he actually carries full responsibility for uh, the unleashing of the war in yugoslavia, which took a serious part in this. this and the further participation and bombing of yugoslavia, they also had direct participation and permission to participate in the bundeswehr, and in various foreign military operations. this is also a free democrat, so personally it does not surprise me at all. but when the minister of defense starts to tell something, here, you understand, of course, that the minister of defense should probably have a higher level of knowledge than krestina lambre well although here is her last statement. by the way, many of them are wrong. it is understood, including here in russia, but it sounds not in what we will supply, but rather, on the contrary. here, i completely agree with yakov to supply something, the

bundeswehr has the opportunity to supply something. this is the first question in order to make new leopards that could be delivered to ukraine, this will take years, and in order to provide their infrastructure it will take even more. i already talked about a german general who said, if you want to create a combat-ready tank division, then for this you will need 10 years, including not just the creation of tanks, but also the training of personnel in combat training and so on and so forth, so the german bundeswehr of this e cannot provide this. well, and most importantly, the fact that he sounded it in the words of the iushulian, and the lambreck sounded. er, germany, er, is ready to deliver on one condition, if this decision is taken unanimously by all countries. well, it is already clear that there is no unanimous decision by nato will, therefore, most likely, germany will speak in favor but technically. i think their capabilities are very limited and in all probability the supply of heavy weapons,

except for what has already been promised, will not be. uh, sure, hard days lately, uh, i'll tell you what. maybe now it’s trite that without the bitterness of defeat, one can hardly feel the real taste of victory, but you know, on the other hand. i caught myself thinking. in the mornings, uh, i hear all tfm. and there is, uh, a heading this day in history and here late summer, this section is dedicated to the eightieth anniversary of the battle of stalingrad. i listen sometimes irregularly, sometimes hitting sometimes not. this is where i got the idea. one day i listened to, well, such a chronicle of the day. i suddenly thought, what if i didn't know how it all ended. i would definitely think that this is our biggest defeat. that is, uh, here are the events of the day a few days, which it would seem, well, that's exactly not to leave

any reason for optimism. and in general, so to speak, they are immersed in some kind of, emotionally unstable state. to put it mildly, yes, but you just understand that this is only one of the days, that a big process is still going on, a process in which, in addition to military successes and failures, there is also a powerful moral side. it seems to me that these recent kharkov events showed me, for example, the main things, then we do not need victory at any cost, er. despite the fact that the great patriotic war, as it was sung, the famous victory in the film was needed. well, let's not beat the price. yes, we definitely do not need victory at any cost. uh, us you don’t need such a victory as, uh, the americans in iraq when there. during the first six months of the

carpet bombing operations, more than 90,000 iraqis, according to various estimates, died. in general, there is a totality, but for three or four years, half a million at the same time. they never counted civilians, and civilians at that. and we have shown that we can create unbearable conditions. yes, the last moment is not even called people. that is, this is all called treasure, roll damage, collateral damage, that is, about them even for people do not count the city and it does not count. moreover, we have shown in recent days that we, of course, can create unbearable conditions. striking infrastructure, but i just perfectly understand that half a year of hostilities have shown that we are not only starting. not only are we starting to take care of our servicemen first of all, but we are well aware that the task was left to the commanders in

february to minimize losses among the civilian population. she has a far-reaching plan, because what do we need to live with these people and it is clear that ukrainian nationalism. of course, it certainly did not begin with the ukrainian language, that ukrainian nationalism is a political mechanism. yes, which has an implementation mechanism. or rather, the mechanism for making political decisions, which is the implementation mechanism. sbu vsu and so on. and we are on the task of destroying this mechanism for making a political decision, but for sure, there will be people of ukraine who consider themselves ukrainians, residents of ukraine, citizens of ukraine with which you will definitely have to live, uh, build relationships with them. and this is also a very important important thing that we take into account now, like fighting . what did those events show, of course, uh, so, returning, uh, to the great patriotic war, it was hard to imagine that somewhere in moscow, uh, it doesn’t matter. in what uh studio there, or

just to put it that way, in some office would they discuss the publications of bioht, yes, the main organ. e, nsd, of that time, but we live in a different time and there is practically no such boundary for the flow of information. on the other side there is that side is hard put little interest. we still take care of ourselves there , yes. and of course, it is important for us that people live in this largely virtual world. yes, and it is important for us that for those who follow how this event develops, some kind of general picture develops, and it is important that this picture is not only dry statistics that outlines, for example, kanashki, but that it is all the same there was a picture with an understanding of how to develop it all. i know how to say sayin there do think what's in uh. naturally the defense really lacks meta sergeevich peskov , that is, a person who not only freely

communicates with journalists, but draws some conclusions, but not at all, or maybe he doesn’t say something to make it clear. it seems to me that i would like the ministry of defense to have such a format of a person. i'm not suggesting calling on dmitry peskov really. i'm here at the department of defense. this is when nikas is clear because it does not concern his sphere. yes, yes, it’s clear that there are specifics, but uh, appeals to the administration president. no, i'll just say. look here. uh, well, like probably most civilians, the term regrouping evokes certain emotions, and the lieutenant general, the gurulev, is a very experienced person. he says, well, that's what it's called in military language. that is. that is what the military calls it. well, it's just that when the military speak their own language, you also need someone to speak human. well, let's say it in civilian terms. yes, a translator needs a person

who simply creates a picture, i don’t set out, dry language regrouping. yes, laying it out helps people understand what's going on helps. well , you know, as it were, here, to be honest, i’ll tell you another parallel, because, when levitan c vodka, you could even feel it in the timbre of his voice, but he didn’t write them. no, he didn't write them, of course, but it's very important just to let people know sometimes, so that people sometimes hear something even in intonation. i mean, yeah, it's a tough time right now. yes, uh, there are serious miscalculations, there are no people who do not make mistakes, but uh it's one day, and the battle big and all. these are lengths and it will definitely end. it is clear to everyone. we are present here than in our victory but people should not lose

optimism for some moments, or at least realize that they are still on some solid ground, uh, understanding the process, and not just getting today's everything were stalinist drug addicts. e no i mean that possessed nerves and optimism. and there is no connection. just imagine on what dream, but solovyov suggested that they came out. so it's okay to know my namesake. uh was a lawyer, er man, so to speak, but a good exposure is a good school, and i think, and i repeat, that it seems to me, it seems to me, yes, and a diplomat. it seems to me that, of course, it is very important that such a figure appear, which, uh, and then, in the end, could journalists, because it is also important, more precisely, it was talked about a lot, including with people in uniform, of course, yes at the last round table. we yes-yes-yes, of course we do not have enough. yes

, among other things, there are not enough, some structures, but which would be explained to civilians, in general, what happens is the tactics of the strategy within the framework of what is accessible and possible, well, well, just explain what and how is happening, by the way, in the time of levitan after all , everything was for the sake of the receivers were seized. only plates, of course, but you went through the explanations of the newspaper, that is, people listened to levitan's report and then read the reports from the front. they read about the heroism of our people e28 panfilov. yes, i will repeat. this is what was not shot then, then there was a problem in the lack of information itself, so we remember perfectly well. i have been for me for a long time it’s hard to understand, i entered the museum in my native dnepropetrovsk and they told me that under yes, the organization was engaged in distributing leaflets, just with bureau reports . i could not understand what the level of heroism was, and then, when i began to deal with information, i realized that a person is in an information vacuum, he is devoid of any serious mountains. yes,

information is e. this is a huge support, especially in a crisis situation, but here ukraine is an information bubble. yes quite right, but an excess of information and i repeat. sometimes very it is important that someone create some kind of picture of the world from this of these scattered pieces of information and show the most important thing after all. how the process is developing in this regard, the champion, allegedly still tells, they say, this information is very important to say. and you said, he says, no, military censorship, of course, is necessary, that is, from the very beginning. yes, but that’s all, through military censorship , people used to read and listen more, but now they somehow like to write more. you understand with the advent of social networks, not being specialists. they already evaluate everything in advance i have the impression that the success in the kharkov direction came as a surprise not only to the allied forces, but also to the ukrainian army. i still remain of my opinion,

i believe that when planning the counteroffensive , they still planned to deliver the main blow to the kherson region. this is correct from a political point of view for them. it would be much more successful in the kherson direction would be politically more significant, because, firstly, we are talking about in an integral region, the regional center is the north crimean canal, and you can continue this indefinitely, because from a political point of view, the capture of two dozen forces or three dozen. everything, it is incomparable with the success that could have been in the kherson direction, therefore they did not succeed in the kherson direction, and obviously this is a failure of the counteroffensive. initially, when they planned, this is a counteroffensive, as far as i know, in the direction of kherson. they planned about 15,000 people, and on the kharkov order nine, but when it all didn’t work out there, they apparently worked out plan b, which, for

some reason unknown to me, but nevertheless, a certain success. they here they managed to, uh, achieve. i uh, listening to vasil, he raised this topic here in relation to the arrival, blinkin. no one knows whether he brought zelensky's information about the negotiations there, or he didn't bring it, but from a political point of view. i believe that this may well be true, because it is in the interests of the united states of america. why do i think so, because these are a month and a half. this is a very dangerous period. u for the united states of america we're on the eve of the elections in the united states of america and uh if the situation in ukraine changes dramatically, and i see how the stakes in this special military operation rise when it goes to a whole new level. yes, i mean attacks on their infrastructure, of course. it's scary, because one and a half months in these conditions. this is a very long time. and

we still let's not forget the threats uh resumption of the offensive in the kiev direction. i just imagine a picture of the world for the americans, if on the eve of the elections, russian troops are standing near kiev, and for a while everything that was they will already forget. if the troops stand near kiev, therefore, they will ask, wait, dear friend. and where did you spend more than 50 billion dollars there to support ukraine like, uh, the russians got to kiev, how is this how to understand this? this will have very serious, in my opinion, political consequences, so the very idea, perhaps the resumption of negotiations. it seems to me from this point of view. she is the americans. very, very much you, because we know what negotiations are. remember, minsk is one or two. it's not that they came and sat down at the negotiating table and signed everything. and tomorrow everything was done. this is a long process. er, it's a lengthy process. by the way, you can calmly go through the autumn-winter period, by the way. why not? well, let's sit down at the negotiating table.

let's agree on how we will negotiate and come every day to turkey or somewhere else to sit down at the negotiating table to sign something about something to discuss we will freeze the conflict we will not shoot we will survive the winter, and then when the elections in the states are over when the winter is over we will resume hostilities and we will continue to do what we love. it seems to me that the idea of ​​the americans is precisely this: do russia need negotiations or not? this is the business of the russian federation well, it seems to me that at the moment there are simply no subjects at all in order to sit down at the negotiating table, and something could be concrete. uh, how specifically, let's say so, to agree on strikes on infrastructure. you know me, here i am today monitoring ukrainian television. i think it's for them in general. well, that's a very serious cold shower. yesterday was euphoria the day before yesterday. there they rejoiced at their success. there are armies of everything else that happened to you ukrainian infrastructure. i think it's

a cold shower for them. and this frightens the zelensky regime very much, why? first, he has nothing to oppose to this. that is, he, well, cannot really protect the infrastructure. yes, and secondly, he understands what economic and, most importantly, political consequences within ukraine can be behind all this. we are entering the autumn-winter period. i represent cities with a population of one million. i'm just putting the success of ukraine at stake 20 30 40 50 villages and one, the city of kharkov with a million population, which is simply frozen without electricity. well, you know, the price of the issue, it is somehow well, not incommensurable, and for zemsky it is, of course, a challenge. 'cause there's nothing to do about it, maybe i think he understands it, i see how much he. well, such uh, some kind of nervous. well , although the puppets, you know, they are all nervous, because someone is constantly pulling them. but it seems to me that he is in this situation, especially nerva, because he understands the consequences and the

worst thing for them is that they still don’t speak in the public sphere . well, how can all this be read between the lines, if with such ease the russians move to a new level of conduct and their own and begin to bomb the infrastructure, then in the next next transition. could be center shots decision-making is also bad for them, and they are also afraid of it, because everything is happening too dynamically, you understand, yesterday there was one event today with a macron, and a conversation with a macron. it seems to me that the idea of ​​​​talking with macron was to give the kiev regime some kind of guarantee of their safety. it seems to me, because i don’t see what the macro zelensky can talk about with them all over. dim turned to macron with a request that a in the evening strikes at the decision-making center, at least in the city of kyiv so that they would not touch. they are like this, listen, every time we discuss , johnson arrived, uh, arrived. she is lena berburg,

someone else arrived there, they are not just like that. you understand how the visit of such high-ranking officials is organized, until there is a guarantee of the safety of their movement on the territory of ukraine by this railway, no one will go anywhere from there. you know what's the matter, no one will come out. if there were no guarantees, and they would not be sure that the caliber would not fly not a single person on the territory of ukraine would have stopped by somewhere, but today they don’t travel restlessly calmly, so i say again, no one came. uh, no, no today, it's not because i'm saying it again here i am actually it's a very serious blow, and i think they're very serious about it. eh, how would they react. understanding that this is, well, this is a completely different level of warfare and we can’t oppose anything to this, you know, i want to connect today. first, two facts. the first fact is that that yesterday the work of the zaporizhzhya nuclear

power plant arrived, all six power units are not working, they are frozen, and the cooling process begins. e these er, all six blocks. what does it mean? this means that ukraine has lost the mind of 22-25% of all electricity, all generations, and ukraine and then at night or already today continued. e. well, especially the impact at night on the infrastructure, but simply on the shopping center in kharkiv- kharkov, these are two events in one - this is already 22% plus more exponents that ukraine loses electricity. system throughout the entire state next god forbid events. they were blows. there were strikes in other regions as well. if these strikes continue, especially under this one, this will, accordingly, further decrease what

is called the generation of ukraine, you understand every day, or god forbid, every day ukraine will lose the supply of generation to a certain number of millions. uh, megawatts, definitely. this is not only taking parts there, the city of kharkov with a million population or the whole or part of the region of the south, but this can capture even further and the second consequence in order to provide these regions. it is necessary to transfer the generation to the west from the center of ukraine, this is a colossal work or colossal costs, and it seems to me that it is possible, zelensky or the one who advises him by showing these calculations. e, and. well , at least i would do it if it were my competence, to see what we are already losing and what we can lose tomorrow, what we can lose, the day after tomorrow, this is not human resources, but it threatens, uh, an energy catastrophe state on the eve of more seasons, winter has not yet begun. this is the first event that

these facts are linked and the second event has not yet arrived, but it may be this week. i listened carefully once more to, uh, your president's statement in vladivostok regarding the grain deal. we discussed this, and then we talked about erdogan's reaction. and this week, we all know, sco leaders, including others, are meeting in samarkand. uh, including president erdogan will come there, and imagine for a second, and the agreement between putin erdogan was not announced and the essence of the transaction will change or change drastically. for example, they will decide to kill this one. and it can be physically done that all the grain that comes with, well, with ukraine, it goes only to africa, as putin said. here is a mineral fertilizer and we are ready to transfer such mineral fertilizers to african countries for free. here you can also do it . why am i saying that not only is the initiative

going to russia, this is unambiguous, how ukraine will still lose, you understand the sales market, this this is not it. this is from the will of zelensky from the will of the leadership. ukraine does not depend on anything in this situation. it's just that either the grain goes to africa or it doesn't go anywhere. and these one and a half to two million tons that we want to sell, and for someone they are simply restored. and these, i even keep quiet. i can only imagine what putin and uh, the leader of china will talk about one meeting of this. if you show a ukrainian that putin is with erdogan, putin is with the leader of china and zelensky is sitting, the president of ukraine is talking to us all over the world. which the whole kind of banner? well, look at the whole world, look at the leader of india, pakistan and so on, everyone gathers in uzbekistan where this whole world is, so it seems to me that i will

repeat myself, maybe the mistake today is the leaders of ukraine, first of all, the president, which states i won't negotiate with russia this is uh, i would like to help ukraine i want to help her, but i can't understand the logic here, i have only two events, that is, one fact, said another possibility event further events will i'm not talking about the front. i'm not talking about attacks. i'm not talking about rocket attacks. i'm just saying for now that this is so. and how uh hmm what kind of situation do they want to see in ukraine, that is, it seems to me that in a better situation than the one that was here on saturday, we will no longer have ukraine for negotiations. and why do we need now? we will not go to pull off or say such statements here, not negotiations. it seems to me that now you need to make every effort. remember once zelensky said, he and the ass rimsky was also invited by the prime minister of israel, whom

only he did not want to see as an intermediary in order to negotiate with putin, and in conclusion, the function of a macron, it is the president of france, after all, it seems to me that he should not be discounted. after all, he still calls and vladimir vladimirovich talks to him. and how could he be a negotiator if he took one of the parties, he can be a negotiator to the other, in no way can he be a negotiator between russia and the united states of america if he is married to one of the parties is the neutral side. wait, wait, wait, you can't say that, you know, well, look, the name is erdogan, despite the goalkeeper and that one has more reason to rush. well, at least a strong claim, but offers a platform for you the right thing, that's this situation. yes, uh, what? and how about what the negotiations ended negotiations

on establishing peace limiting hostilities vladimirovich vladimir vladimirovich why raise the stakes of the human world? uh, well, in groups to the roman , he still had some kind of economy. wait, hold on there’s nothing at all, as he gets into negotiations, they won’t give him a penny of money. by the way, he has the goal of others, you understand? you yourself say at the biden, the elections are bidens, the elections go to another. eh, the king will say, let's talk, of course, these negotiations are in the interests. bayda will not decide the essence of this. the plate is absolutely a tactical task they are rigorous. wait dear gentlemen, it is not necessary that there are winners in a military conflict; not everyone can necessarily be a winner. these are not new warriors in the world now. this is not the way

necessarily. what name what war war. well , listen to the united states of america shame shame they have lost, and we have not lost. well, ukraine will wipe itself off, and everything will be fine february president of the russian federation vladimirovich putin clearly formulated the goals and objectives of the special military operation today dmitry sergeevich peskov nikolai platonovich patrushev confirmed all the goals and objectives of the special military operation will be met see you tomorrow.

i invite you, dear friends, to our next

edition of the author's besogon tv program which will be called if god is for us, who is against us. i hope you understand. why are our shows called like that? i'm looking forward to seeing you. i hope it will be interesting. let's translate from clerical, but understandable, everything is not so

scary if there is an instruction.

in the heart of parma soon hello and the main legal events of the day will be told by the correspondents of the program vesti duty and i am maxim banditry. we've had at least 14 raids on jewelry stores, st. petersburg.