this is not a matter of politics, but simply the arrangement of states in such a way that people do not suffer, enjoy life, and so what they are doing this time, we can and are ready to supply them. to do this, even go for and so to speak, e hmm, some easing of the sanctions regime, but then through them so that it goes to the same africa asia and this is no , well, what is it called? or that they don't know about it in paris in berlin in rome in madrid no they don't know in brussels yes of course they do. and a question, by the way, to journalists who provide, as well as information background. well, how can you deal with this issue. well, it's a shame, after all, to hush up such a problem, it's a shame to hold conference banquets and receptions. the main theme of which

is to contribute to the fight against hunger on the african continent, humanitarian assistance to those in need at the same time not to notice this impossible heinous behavior of western countries in relation to those about whom they care so much, such a situation must be dealt with immediately. it's not even a question of commerce. we are not even talking about it now. you same question just really humanity. that's also impossible. again, this is not a question of respect for international law. we all understood everything a long time ago, that is, there is no international law for the west. no they are. as a matter of fact, they openly spoke about this, and i emphasize that they are now relying on certain rules. and we have long understood that there is no truly liberal economy, which is based on self-regulation. and on the laws

of economics, the elasticity of supply and demand is also long gone for the west. we understood all this. everything this is a different matter and the question is another question is what is valid if food and fertilizer do not reach. for those who really need them. this can lead to big problems. and why do they not reach, because they are blocked by the west with sanctions, threats, legally, physically, and so on in different ways. what needs to be done to correct the situation for this we continue to interact with the general secret of the conference, he is on trade and development rbc greenspan with its team on all issues of the implementation of the memorandum in the thirty-seventh 9th of september. the first face-to-face russian military consultations were held in geneva with the participation

of representatives of the relevant departments of the company. the result of these efforts should be practically progress in the normalization of russian exports. in this regard, we note the secretary general's statement that unhindered access for our fertilizers and foodstuffs to world markets has not yet been secured. the task of ensuring global food security remains unfulfilled for its part. again, we confirm our readiness to deliver for export before the end of the year. 30 million tons of grain and over 20 million tons of fertilizers. i want these figures to be distributed to the countries of asia and africa so that they know about russia's readiness to supply food. this will certainly help achieve sustainable price stabilization on world markets, which is of key importance for food-buying countries and guarantee future harvests, because we are talking about fertilizers not only about what is today, but what will happen next year in a year and so further.

guarantee all future harvest in the state agricultural producers who depend on these fertilizers. we proceed from the premise that issues such as the threat of famine and the prevention of a global food crisis should not be politicized or supplied with any preconditions. we know that the west does not do this, but still, there are limits to western cynicism, and we must point this out to them. well, by the way, to the question of the cynicism of law and everything that is happening, after all, in order to create these excesses of lawlessness. here in particular. so i said, and the mines on which the civilians of donbass are undermined i said manipulations with food a and this topic, uh, the west is here in order to do all this. they need the essentials. one condition is

informational support exactly this is that condition. in which the west feels absolute permissiveness. in these areas , they need and they clearly speak about it, and we see it, to prevent it through their actions. the dissemination of truthful factual information is done to ensure that the world information has become just one-color, so that the information is presented only one-sided, so that it is a road. only with one-way traffic, so that there is only one center, dissemination of information without feedback without the possibility of connecting other voices. and here is a specific

example for you, belonging to the american it-monopoly of the western social network, they continue to obediently fulfill their will. eh, their owners. they are simply clearing the global digital space of any alternative to the broadcast from washington . official points of view , russian accounts and resources are mainly subjected to censorship. well, everyone is well aware of the genocide of russian media resources and journalists in the information space that washington arranged. well, now , uh, they have already encroached on state official resources, diplomatic accounts, accounts of russian departments of our foreign institutions, are leading a kind of anti-rating of digital russophobes youtube video hosting, i remind you that it belongs to google corporation through the efforts of the administration this site. without explaining the reasons recently, two, by the way, our briefings were deleted, in which, as always, the official position of the ministry of foreign affairs on a wide

range of topical foreign affairs was stated. physical issues are the position of our country and, by the way, there was free communication between journalists, if anything, how does youtube and google relate to the issue of censorship, by the way, western journalists ask questions. you cut them out too. it can be assumed that someone simply does not want our approaches to be presented in the public domain. it's not even a guess. it is a fact. they simply will not allow, the dissemination of such information will not allow the west to do all these atrocities. and simply afraid that their own audience will be able to get acquainted with the argument bypassing the censorship of western media news agencies and on a regular basis. they just cover it all up . that, if not to say more, probably pointwise not just deliberately distort many issues in the modern western paradigm, the principle of freedom of information obviously works only in one direction. they have the right to

disseminate information. all the rest have the right only to perceive it, even it is impossible to refuse it. also, youtube again, like a month earlier , without giving any explanation of the reasons, gave a number of videos to the social account of the russian embassy in the uk under the blow of western understanding . . alexander gusarov russian tv channels are fine. yes. you see a russian diplomat gives interviews to russian tv channels and everything is removed from youtube from american youtube, twitter, as before , openly sided with the kiev regime, with western sponsors turning a blind eye to the bacchanalia arranged in the english-speaking segment. this network is organized by groups of ukrainian troll bots and so on. all in the classics i do not see, i do not hear. this means that this is not the case, with strict censorship, but are subjected to our foreign institutions that honestly bring information to users cases of blocking the publication of russian

posts on the account of the russian embassy in nepal in romania have become more frequent , as they say, ours have been suspended. just with the wish to at least inform about the formal reasons for such decisions, we still have not received an answer. i have a question you m-m. how would you think that we can not answer. not mirrored. we can, of course we can. if we have already spoken about this and taken appropriate steps , gross attempts to limit information work, to deprive russian suburban institutions global audience of credible sources. such a policy of american corporations violates all those principles, and this is freedom of speech freedom of information dissemination, which is not always lobbied in the first place by themselves. and it is shown that they stick to it all only in words. in fact, strict control, it resembles the worst totalitarian practices, an attempt to limit any point of view that is alternative to the western mainstream on its part. we would like to draw

your attention to other online platforms. here, subscribe to the official resources of the ministry foreign affairs of russia, our embassies are simply on other sites, the entire range of published information and videos are available on the official website of the ministry of foreign affairs in our accounts in the telegram services rutube vkontakte odnoklassniki or other legal platforms. all links are there, and there is a section on the website of the ministry called uh, the ministry of foreign affairs in social networks, all official accounts go there, subscribe follow us. well, of course. one of the most important elements. that this western lawlessness is historical falsification. they are part of the informational informational confrontation, but how sophisticated they have become. i honestly can say with delight i watched how every year in lithuania and ukraine, russophobes inflate and exalt an episode of one of the wars between the

moscow and lithuanian principalities, it was called the battle of the osh. why with delight, because you know such cynical stupidity, beating on themselves, well, it was difficult to expect from them. so vilnius on the occasion of not a round anniversary, not a round date of the 514th anniversary, the battle was organized international conference. she was called together in the fight against moscow's imperialism then and now then when well, just wondering. in the 16th century , imperialism, you are sure, maybe then marxism was right away with communism, but listen to such a pseudo-historical swing, even from lithuania it was impossible to expect, but they coped with the impossible task they could handle. i just remember exactly which empire in the 16th century. it was

proclaimed by peter i only 200 years later, we heard about peter i, he cut down your window. but that's impossible. well, this is some kind of wild, wild, eh anticulture. anti-historical undermining of everything that is connected with common sense who was the headliner at this kind of historical conference dedicated to the battle longer, which performed 514 years. that's who it was necessary to invite from international experts such world historians who could clearly tell everything how it was 514 years ago. well, your imagination is not enough, but in lithuania it was enough. adviser to the office of the president of ukraine oleksii arrestovich