inequality inflation and winter dissatisfaction new barriers in the form of red lines plot from austria rebuilding the world after yalta what changes await us in the materials of our program? we did not have time to look back, as the concept of wartime mobilization and nuclear deterrence turned from abstractions into something not at all abstract. but almost a mirage. it seems that life as it was at the beginning of the year, the expected trajectories have changed for the world of the country of each of us, the reversibility of events is not provided, therefore it is advisable without unnecessary understand emotions. what is the specificity of the moment and what's next in the face of acute international struggle. evaluation, not understanding, but the capabilities of the opposite side they constantly talk about

what russia is today and begin to measure this is the amount of gdp and they say that it is 2% or less of the budgets and so on, but the actual geopolitical analysis is complex. not enough, but on the russian side they are just focusing on certain advantages that russia has, of course, they do. but, nevertheless, there is an underestimation of the american capabilities of what america is capable of doing in fact today. here we have, uh, the culmination of all this in the ukrainian conflict. and what is happening is, in fact, a gradual shift. this is asymmetry, a symmetrical conflict that changes the balance of power. it changes due to the active connection. the west is doing something to almost everything today, ukraine except landing alive. all this is done by the living ukrainians, but everything else is already there, and

therefore, so to speak, this is the asymmetry that was, a certain advantage for russia, it also turns into a symmetrical one in this situation. given that there is this, this is an underestimation of both sides, this leads to an escalation. and the further, the more in terms of the degree of tension, the current military-political crisis. it is difficult to compare with something that we saw, of course, the cold war was rich in aggravations, but it lasted a long time and got used to it. express myself the correct scale, threats and dangers what they are afraid to avoid, and that the coming alluvial year 2022 was a shock, because in three decades everyone believed in eternal peace, it has practically arrived, universal interconnection is extremely beneficial for the majority.

well, yes, contradictions are growing from the socio-economic arco-political ones, but they will be resolved, however, they are resolved, alas, since this usually happens in the world of states and people, the urgent task is not to cross the red line, beyond which either the unknown, or, on the contrary, a terrible predestination. red line or the red line is a term that means the limits of patience of one of the parties about its origin, often argued by mentioning the 1928 agreement of the same name on the division of the oil industry in the middle east or recalling the red scale on the instruments of cars. this is in english in french they say about the yellow line. perhaps this came from the yellow road markings that were in france until 72. in england, the events of the

crimean war of 1854 are remembered in order to repel the attack of the russian cavalry under a balaclava commander the 93rd scottish infantry regiment ordered the soldiers to line up not in four ranks, but in two fronts of the attack. the soldiers were too wide, there were not enough, but the maneuver allowed the army to stretch out war correspondent. times. wim, the pickle described a regiment of englishmen in red coats. a thin red line, a bristling steel. and although the race was not present, during these events the expression entered the english language and became a cultural phenomenon. there is another term that means deadline or deadline. this expression came from the first ever the concentration camp of mankind, better known as anderson wilskaya prison, was organized by southerners during the american civil war, its population was three times the estimated figure of 10,000 people. the camp was surrounded by towers that created a

shootable perimeter. it's called the deadline. everyone who tried to escape sentries shot, without warning, there are stories that some could not stand the terrible conditions of detention and committed suicide. they climbed over the fence and ended up dead zone. draw red lines so that it would be impossible not to notice them. or, even more so, to ignore the special art, let's talk with our kind, comrade dmitry trenin, the real doka and in matters of international security. good afternoon. ah. well, we have entered into a major international crisis, an international military-political crisis. it seems that having forgotten the safety instructions a little , how to remember, well, generally speaking about safety, as it still existed, it was not intended for

crisis periods, and for a period of more or less calm, when it was necessary for enu, it was easy to ensure that the other side correctly calculated and read your signals. here, where conflicting in syria, for example, is an example. here is an example of such things. and now we are in a territory where there is no security, in principle, because we find danger in the territory and here, uh, red lines. uh, who drew with the russian side by the americans. well, let's just say it's not very respected. moreover, as i understand them. uh, the line their own line is to constantly move them constantly testing and moving them. in general, in the american one, here are, uh, the rule books on which the world of our red line is based.

no, so the only thing that can stop. uh, the united states is in this situation. this is the fear of your own fear. er, next step. that's it, there's nothing else. have fear apparently or not? or is it cleverly hidden because uh, well, i think we've both had this experience in the last month and repeatedly and informally american colleagues said that, well, we thought. you can really pose a threat, so to speak, but in fact it is a complete bluff, therefore. why should we limit ourselves? the other day, literally , the khodja bank with a well-known military leader in the past said that it means they are ready to destroy the black sea fleet there if these weapons are used. what should be done? and is it possible to do something so that these red lines of the faith return, here is how they would act. well i guess that little, what can be done to bring them back. uh, i'm back to the idea of ​​fear again, because there's

nothing else to hold our opponent back. if you can't speak seriously. i think the american strategy of strategically defeating russia a is based on the belief that russia, uh, hmm, won't use nuclear weapons. what is she either? he cares or considers that the destruction of civilization is still too high a price for maintaining his positions here. in my opinion, lies a potentially fatal miscalculation for everything humanity, because i have putin’s phrase from the eighteenth year that we don’t need a world without russia, it somehow stuck, and i constantly remember it, but i don’t think that

many people in the united states take it seriously as well, for example . well, the whole experience. uh observation. for e. vladimir putin had to be convinced that he almost never says a word just like that, but, apparently, he is not convinced. well seen here, probably too big. or rather, too much temptation to use the current situation on ukraine for well, if you want, the solution of the russian problem, as the german problem disappeared as a result of the second world war. e from the european landscape, so why not? can the russian problem disappear from the western horizon? and here, in my opinion, our colleagues

took a bite of his business. and moving forward towards the collision. now a new situation is clearly emerging. in the case of a favorable outcome for the organizers of the outcome of the referendums, the russian border will be officially changed and , accordingly, uh, those words that have always our officials say about the use of nuclear weapons. see read the doctrine. but, if you read the doctrine based on the new frontiers, what does this mean? well, i think that , firstly, the uh of the territory of the russian federation has long been subjected to blows for free by ukrainians, but a blow from the americans and nato, uh, with the help of weapons that were provided by the united states by nato countries in this sense, the kherson region, nothing will differ from the republic of crimea from the belgorod region of kursk and

possibly other regions of russia where can ukrainian arrivals fly to? our doctrine says that nuclear weapons can be used if there is a threat to the existence of the state. uh-huh no, some kind of projectile will fly into russian territory. yes, and the threat to the existence of states. here e! evaluate and decide does this or that action of the enemy threaten the existence of the state? this is the duty of the supreme commander. but i will say more in my opinion. many people in united states and europe well, europe is much less so, but in the united states . nuclear exchange of nuclear strikes in the

european theater of war that is, not only ukraine but more broadly, as something ukraine, of course, as something, in principle, is not catastrophic. and the main thing here, in my opinion, if we make nuclear weapons to turn nuclear weapons into an effective deterrent in the specific ukrainian situation , is to convince the united states that the strike will follow on us territory because an attack on the territory of ukraine, in general, will not stop anyone, an attack on the territory of europe will not be considered as critical, important, critical dangers. but hitting the united states is a different matter. but i say it again over the past few decades after the end of the cold war, the opinion has been that this is what constituted the greatest fear during the

cold war. this is an exchange of massive nuclear nuclear strikes between the nuclear superpowers of the ussr and the united states. it's history now no one will return to this, and nuclear weapons, again with it, are reduced to the level of use for e-e maximum in the theater of war, and so in the theater of operations. nuclear weapons did not immediately become a deterrent after world war ii, they were perceived as another way of conducting hostilities already in october 1945 , the us military began working on a secret plan for a totality nuclear strike. now some experts call this plan a nuclear bluff, a desire to create the illusion of a big the number of atomic bombs in the pentagon's arsenal, and in fact there were only a few of them at that time, although

after the so-called chinese volunteers entered the korean war, general macarthur demanded that 30-50 atomic bombs be dropped along the border with china, they were supposed to create a radioactive train that would isolate korea truman refused , fearing the ussr would enter the war, but publicly stated on november 30, 1950 that the use of nuclear weapons in korea might have had the opposite effect. openly expressed indignation of the uk france other states of western europe joined them. they were frightened by moscow's response to its tu-4 aircraft, a copy of the american b-29s with nuclear bombs did not reach the united states, but could easily reach london and paris on the impossibility of a retaliatory strike by the ussr, by the way, a new american plan was built nuclear war drop-shot change estimates forced the korean war on april 12, 1951.

a large group of b-29 bombers. with the support of hundreds of fighters, was about to strike at the bridge over the river, making jiang walk on it supplying korea from china, 36 soviet jet fighters went up in alarm in less than 20 minutes of battle. they destroyed dozens of american aircraft, without losing a single one of their own, more than a hundred american pilots were captured in the press. the president was dubbed black thursday, and the corridor along the alley of mogs river, poured into this area, was banned. with the development of jet fighter aircraft, it became clear that in a nuclear war, most likely, all american fortresses. will be shot down before how they will enter the combat course, in addition, by the fifty- sixth year of the ukrainian ssr, their own bombers appeared that could reach the territory of the united states. a year later, the ussr ruled the successful tests of the world's first

intercontinental ballistic missile. so there is a problem for this when the russian president seeks to contain the enemy by direct or indirect references to nuclear weapons. the enemy interprets this, at least publicly , as a threat to use nuclear weapons. moreover, the threat of the use of nuclear weapons falls on in the western concept of warfare, when e failure on the e, front, if in the course of a war using only conventional means of destruction is compensated by the use of nuclear weapons, they attribute this doctrine to us, yes, while it is quite possible that the blow will follow not e on a specific theater of operations, but not at a certain distance from it, well, it’s really logical

that, if so many are trying to draw analogies with the caribbean kris, which in my opinion now. completely incorrect, a different situation, but if already trying to return, that's hmm that way of escalating to solve the problem, then there must be a direct direct threat from the dual-nuclear powers. they are like this in sequence. that's all we're discussing. uh, in general, it follows that this is a funnel, from which there is no way out yet, that is, absolutely linear logic. it turns out without the terrible horror that everyone will suddenly feel in american and so on. and how is there even a way out of this spiral here? well, i think we have a unique case in many ways. i honestly can't think of another situation that even remotely reminiscent of the ukrainian current crisis, indeed, the funnel is drawing in

not only us, but also the americans, and we are going. in general, we are on the road to a head-on collision. for us, this is an existential question, because we are talking not only about the fate of ukraine. but what is much more important for us than the fate of russia, and in the most fundamental sense of the word? in the mid -nineties, mobilization was resorted to during the balkan conflict only in the summer of 1995 ministry of internal affairs of serbia deployed about 10,000 refugees and returned them to the front in croatia and bosnia-herzegovina in 2008 against the backdrop of an escalation of the armed conflict. general mobilization was announced in south ossetia georgia, the latter, according to various estimates, involved in the war zone from 60 to 100,000 reservists in september 2020 due to the events in nagorno-

karabakh, general mobilization for the first time in history declared armenia earlier martial law was introduced by nagorno-karabakh repeatedly. mobilization was carried out in libya, where for more than ten years kings, two authorities, elected by the people parliament controls the east and formed with the support of the un and the european union government west in january last year, the commander of the livi. the national army of caliph hafft declared jihad and general mobilization in order to resist the actions of turkey, which allowed the sending of the military to the lily, israel generally exists in conditions of partial mobilization almost from the moment of its formation in the country there is no contract army, calls for service are subject, both men and women backbone armed forces is the cadre army, but in the event of a threat, all citizens to be mobilized must stand up due to this during the arabs of the israeli

wars, the ratio of attacking and defending forces never even reached two to one, therefore, israel won over and over again in the confrontation with the arab states . for the united states, these are more questions of political prestige, questions of leadership, questions of position in the world system of a global so big, yes, but even if we allow, if we allow, uh, russia's success in ukraine and failure american strategy of defeating russia, this will not be fatal to the position of the united states in the world , they have no rivals in the part of the world where they dominate, on the contrary, i would say that the potential defeat of the united states in ukraine could lead to even more

cohesion. uh, those countries that president putin is called tallit around the united states because i just can not imagine myself otherwise , well then, the last question. he must be so active. but, if we ignore the understandable the bitterness with which we all comment on the situation, that how the figures were crushed, right? you look who rules us now. i am the world between us. eh, people have lost, therefore, a sense of reality, it is clear that there is some share here . well, such excitement, well, seriously, if we talk, has something really changed in the perception of political leaders, and what before, uh, added confidence in understanding the border? and what did it change only or that there was no big war for a long time? i think the feeling of fear has disappeared. generally speaking, the world is based on fear.

about nothing else. therefore, if fear disappears, then the world is in danger. and in the west, in the united states, first of all, but also in europe , fear has disappeared, otherwise the europeans would have begun to react to the shelling of the zaporozhye nuclear power plant. and i think that the lack of fear and uh, i would add the case of the europeans, the lack of responsibility for their safety, because it is completely and completely in front of the united states of america create a situation in which we, uh, well, there was a very famous book, uh, dedicated to centenary of the first world war. uh, blind, eyes closed, so to speak, uh, going to

meet the catastrophe. i have the impression that now, at least in europe, we see people who have closed their eyes and go, uh, in the direction of the cliff, the direction of the abyss. and it's very, very accurate. so bring back the fear and biden knows the truth. i think biden, well, it's hard for me to speak charm, as in a person. if we talk about the collective baidan, that is, in the white house. i think the white house thinks they well, you know, that's how they said about clinton that she was. i don't know how to say it in russian anyway. here he became a smatterer. he himself is not that the smartest, but the most like that, uh! well, he is a head taller than everyone, so he thinks better than anyone. yes, they have the impression that they think better than anyone in the world per head for two and sodium, and so on

and so on, and russia is uneven for them, by the way, speaking about the red lines. how did we start this conversation? they were perhaps in a relationship between more or less equal quantities. and when s on the one hand, uh, so to speak, there are superpowers, and on the other hand, uh, the remnants of the former superpower from the point of view of the united states there can be no talk of any e even nominal equality. thank you, dmitry was training with us. after the advertisement we will continue, and the system forming the un dot

bank for entrepreneurs and enterprises this apartment is probably very expensive thanks to avito, the mortgage rate is six tenths of a percent lower, so it was even enough for a child, no wife, but there are discounts by type buy apartments and get a discount on your mortgage, even come at the reduced city rate. you can have a loyalty program for profit and comfort

gazpromneft stop for those who do not stop open a free account for business in alpha-bank for any actions on the account choose how to spend your holidays. now choose four nuggets or two strips for only 39 rubles. only in the application it’s delicious and the point everything experts will find, we guarantee the quality m profitable video smartphone technopark 8c for 8.99 rubles. m.video first openers buy new clothes in stores at

avito things you will be the first to have. here is wonderful wonderful wonderful a. now fix this pose. keep holding great. and now change i can't constantine if the fixed rate for each no longer change the cash loan. a rate of 8.9% each is an opening. new york hosts high- level week of the un general assembly the atmosphere is overwhelmed, but perhaps not as much as one of joseph biden's statements might be expected. even provoked the approval of russia, the president of the united states spoke out

for the increase in the number of permanent members of the un security council in moscow said, well, yes, and we have long been about the same to rejoice at the sudden coincidence prematurely. no one is opposed to reforming the security council so that it matches modern realities, but how the current five was formed according to an understandable principle, the winners of the second world war, and now the criteria for the population in terms of the size of the economy by region do not agree. and if they suddenly get into a quarrel, how to use them for these discussions, in fact, there is one question about veta law, which remains quite exclusive with a strategy that only 5 permanent members have in the un security council, these are the winners in world war ii usa great britain russia france and china, the charter does not directly mention the century, but it says that all decisions,

except for procedural ones, must be taken by consensus when it first appeared, most countries sided with washington on all issues. that is why, even before the end of the war, the ussr wanted to join the un not as one state, but as all allied republics separately, roosevelt said in response to this that the united states would then allow all its states to join the un as a result, in addition to the ussr, the organization also included the ukrainian and belarusian republics of the forty-sixth to sixty- ninth years, the majority, where in addition to five permanent members there were six more temporary remained on the side of the united states in order to block the resolutions of this majority, the soviet union imposed 93% of all branches, by the way, the resolution according to which the un troops intervened in the korean war was adopted without the ussr after the appearance of the prc in forty

ninth year. moscow demands that beijing be given a seat in the security council. the rest of the council members refuse, and then moscow is boycotted without the korean resolution being adopted without taking into account the opinion of the soviets. the protests of the ussr had no effect and in august moscow returned to the security council. however, in the sixties, the western majority fell apart as a result of decolonization, the composition of the un increased new, developing countries. they often voted against western initiatives in the seventy-first year, china takes the place of taiwan and the composition of the security council expands to 10 temporary members as a result of 1970 to 1991 the us imposed 56% light and the soviet union less than any of the western powers after the end of the cold war there was a short period of harmony in the security council from may 1990 to may 1993 right century used not a single time so far this

longest period in the history of the un weta is a valuable invention of the second half of the last century , designed to replace the world war before in the face of actions unacceptable to some of the great, powers that used force after the forty-fifth year it became possible to declare disagreement and the rest accepted it as a red light. true , there is an opinion that the system did not work because everyone suddenly began to respect international law. it's just that the permanent members of the security council quickly became the owners of atomic weapons and it was not the un charter that stopped them, but the fear of inadvertently provoking a nuclear power. now the fear has diminished, and the former balance of power and restraint that is associated with it is gone. the league of nations was founded in 1919

a year after the first world war, it was supposed to contribute to peace and security, taking into account the interests of the entente and its allies, 63 countries became its members, but nevertheless, it was based on the principle of preserving the new world order by the winners of the first world war. the charter of the league of nations declared the need to limit armaments and proclaimed the principle of mutual guarantee of the territorial integrity of the participating countries, but the organization did not fulfill its purpose in 1933 germany and japan announced their withdrawal from the league of nations and in the thirty-seventh, their example was followed italy the league of nations did not react to hitler's anschluss. austria or the partition of czechoslovakia well, the ussr also expelled its ranks for the war with finland. the league the nation replaced the un about, the creation of which in february forty-fifth was agreed in yalta by roosevelt churchill and stalin , 3 months later, representatives of 50 states

gathered in san francisco for a conference that lasted 2 month. and now i am obliged and it is a great honor for me to announce the vote on the approval of the charter of the united nations it was then that the main organs of the un were created the general assembly and the security council, the economic and social trusteeship council, the international court of justice and the secret, the conference participants prepared, adopted the charter, in addition, it included its own peacekeeping forces, which the league of nations did not have, these are un military contingents from the units of the participating countries that subordinate organizations to ensure security. they can use coercion, it can be peacekeeping, a show of force, or a blockade for 70 years. of its existence peacekeeping forces conducted about 40 operations, but

he was unable to oppose anything to the american invasion of yugoslavia or iraq. were norms related to spheres of influence, what was it called? this has always been practically the case at the yalta conference as well. it was no longer formally indicated, but it was also there. and this also prevented the possibility of waging war. so, of course, there were norms of non-interference in the internal affairs of sovereignty, so on this basis there were certain e, and compromises and cooperation were built and we remember how it was in the cold war, especially when the most dangerous periods were positive since the sixties and especially in the seventies, there was already space for cooperation and on strategic issues a factor of economic interdependence arose. russia has become more and more dependent on europe

, respectively, on russia, and this is what created the fact that sociologists describe the state of the late modern everything, as they say in force. the contradictions of the universe, but there is a certain understanding of how to act and how not to act and these are the conditions they created reinforced a kind. this right of veto, about which we are talking, this informal side is the formal legal one, and the informal one is this understanding. e among the great powers, how to behave towards each other and how to behave towards the defeated powers, and then it all collapsed, the cold war was still such a symmetrical order. this symmetry was held first at the end of the second world war, then nuclear symmetry arose. and after says that during the crisis, so to speak, there was a clear feeling that we had a symmetrical military

potential, including especially the nuclear area, and then it collapsed and now, apart from nuclear symmetry. no, feelings. in any case, there is definitely no feeling on the american side that the symmetrical order is an asymmetric rivalry. the former insurance war has also disappeared somewhere. time has passed, and uh, there is no such fear, there is no more the old ideological antagonism. but this is what is not. this is not a cold war. in this sense, and what is today is this, that we have this rivalry, rivalry of powers , first of all, to make the world order such that would meet our interests and preferences, first of all, and the planet does not play in this either. already previous roles. the topic of the abolition of the right century or the demolition of one of its owners, namely russia, pops up regularly. this is not possible without actually

dismantling the system. un nuclear deterrent. of course it's not going anywhere. but as we discussed today, its effectiveness has decreased compared to the cold war, and the attempt set a precedent for punishing a nuclear superpower. it will also change the world disposition, it is better not to experiment further. it is the most representative assembly of the political subjects of the planet for three quarters of a century, the number of member countries has grown almost four times, the collapse of the empire and the self-determination of peoples had an explosive nature . where there are boundaries, there is potential conflict. change of boundaries. the question is always explosive, sometimes they agree on lovingly. but this exception to the rule border disputes cause sharp contradictions are usually military. land

borders in the form of straight lines were often drawn by the british and french colonialists in the deserts of north africa, the demarcation was not carried out. yes, and the lines themselves are conditional, a different situation in british india in 1947, in its place, the indian union of pakistan arose and later bangladesh was divided on religious grounds, and referendums were to be held in the disputed territories. ultimately. this led to conflicts. the most famous around the camera even before the end of the first world war became. it is clear that the ottoman empire is losing its possessions in the middle east in may 1916, a secret agreement appeared with the agsa, pico great britain received the territories where now the cancer is located jordan israel france departed the north-eastern part of turkey northern cancer, syria ivana russia should have gone to the

turkish straits. for the revolution of the seventeenth year, she withdrew from the war. the promise of british intelligence agent thomas edward lawrence to create an arab state in exchange for the support of british troops. not even mentioned in europe an example of the establishment of borders is the curzon line, a dismantling line between poland and the ero of the ussr, which was proposed by the british foreign secretary in 1920. she did not fully take into account the limits of the ethnic settlement of ukrainians and to the west of it. there are several ukrainian regions of the border left. often passed not only in countries, but also in cities after the second world war it was divided, berlin after the collapse of the ussr on the territory of estonia turned out to be half of the city of narva the russian part is called ivangorod and the authorities in belgium, the netherlands peacefully divided the town of borem , both belgian and dutch

municipal services operate there. and it is only by signs that one can understand who owns the territory. the border was often redrawn, sometimes radically, however, there have been shifts in this issue in the era of international institutions for changing borders. moreover , a very correct installation began to be considered unacceptable by force. but institutions, as it turned out , are not eternally tied to their time, and the essence of politics is unchanged, especially since the 20th century laid in fact, an insoluble contradiction, the very concept of sovereignty, the concept of sovereignty, is ambiguous ; the first meaning is when one ethnic group forms a national state and this is the principle of national self-determination and international law considers it as a legitimate principle of territorial integrity on the other hand. one nation is not in the ethnic sense in the civil sense, one territory, which is indivisible in the 20th century. the emphasis

shifted first to one side, then to the other side between the world wars, the principle dominated self-determination. after 1945 the point of view prevailed. if we recognize everyone who wants to decide for herself, the world will be extremely unstable, that is, territorial integrity is more important. now it has again swung in favor of recognizing the claim to self-determination, despite the dangerous precariousness of such a world, but i repeat, the principle of sovereignty does not give a clear understanding of how to act, everything depends very much on the circumstances. and that means a careful degree, unpredictable, including he staged it, clearly, but there is still the will of the people. iota is necessary this is a very difficult question. if you respond to all manifestations of the will of the people, the level of instability will increase sharply in many countries, there is a minority with areas of residence that overlap . the world community is all states.

ideally, they should have clear and stable criteria for recognizing the right to self-determination and are always needed. diplomatic efforts. well, yes, it is an extremely difficult political task how and when to respond to people's requests when something is not clear. refer to international law lawyers will say and they will do it right, but what if it bumps into a wall of great-power ambitions, when, from the point of view of the theory of realism in international relations, international law primarily ends where the question of the balance of power begins, for example, we are talking about a large country that violates whose is sovereignty. take, for example, the american invasion of iraq under a fictitious pretext and where there was international law, when it became clear that through the security council he could not carry out the operation by the united states just they said that they would act on their own, because it was their law. the right, of course, is not

good for the leading powers, and therefore they are such that they limit the use of force, respect someone else's sovereignty and do not violate it. whose rights? i hope that the emergence of a multipolar world will help restore international law, because there will be more balance, the annexation of territories, in theory, should also comply with international legal norms, but in reality, what is international law when it comes to real policy and specific goals? who can punish israel for the annexation of the dutch heights or morocco for the annexation, western sahara the syrian dutch heights went to israel during the six-day war of the sixty-seventh year, together with east jerusalem, in july of the eightieth, the knesset passed a law according to which the city was declared the single and indivisible capital of israel a year later the israeli parliament annexed the dutch heights. both

decisions were not accepted by the un security council conflict over western sahara over the duration is not much inferior to the arabs of israel in the mid-seventies, after the departure of the spanish colonialists, the struggle for the independence of the region was led by the front, the palisario supported algeria fighting. they continued until the ninety- first year and stopped only after he sent frontalio fighters there on a peacekeeping mission, proclaimed an independent state, a saharan, arab democratic republic. he does not recognize sander and neither the garden nor the annexation of the prefabricated territory. kingdom of morocco control approximately 80% of the western sahara territory the rest of the palisario front donald trump signed a declaration recognizing the dutch heights as part of israel in march 2019 . this happened during his meeting at the white house with israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu.

this step was condemned by the government of all arab states. russia and the european union held mass protest demonstrations throughout the region, but no serious political and economic steps were taken against the united states by the arabs. a year later, trump signed a declaration of recognition sovereignty hassle, over western sahara everything went almost unnoticed. but a year later, the sovereignty of the kingdom over western sahara was recognized by 18 more countries, including the emirates and jordan . when we hear accusations from experts that the recognition of some territories. this is something unheard of. we just smile because we know how many violations there are. the same kind was on the part of those who now accuse others of violations being introduced, the next thought. if you acted like israel or morocco, that is, you took away something that belongs to another and are able to hold. it is under control for a long

time. then it’s normal, israel is under the patronage of the united states morocco under the patronage of france so that everything turns out to be possible and the point is not in international law, but in the alignment of forces and interests to regulate world politics. to the state of a well-oiled mechanism. no one can neither right nor force, anarchy is the natural state of the world environment. any historian of international relations will confirm the question of how this can be treated in the spirit of the libusters, seize the moment, but can you increase your prudence by understanding? real risks it would be better if the second one in europe , russian gas turned out to be very economically worrying, and played an important role. european dependence drawing bulgaria kristaya komarnitsky for the sega newspaper hello, my name is olov and the man says and i am dependent

on russian gas. hello aries meet the rest dave repair the theme of the game of thrones does not let american artists go on the house it says europe and on the pipe. clear nord stream, winter is coming. glad to see the energy crisis from pakistan. come on, don't be lazy, one man says to another. yes it will light, inflation written on a giant stone michael ramirez ordinary us hardships on the eve of the midterm elections good news, man says gasoline prices fell slightly chinese english-language newspaper china daily, and some features of the application of sanctions matryoshka, understandable and familiar image, but in europe apparently . walks hard. about weekdays one of the most prosperous european countries in austria, a report by julia hitl, our

life will become so expensive that we will not be able to access what we had before, we will not be able to pay the bills, we won't be able to buy our own groceries. is it right that the boiling point of the people began to take to the streets the other day across austria there were mass demonstrations demanding a reduction in prices by the organizers. this time the unions. they say that they gathered about 30,000 citizens for the rally. i have a family of five last year we spent almost 3,000 kw, which cost us 1,400 euros together with gas. in september, we received a letter from our energy supplier that now we will have to pay twice as much. and this, of course, is not very good news. life in austria before it could not be called cheap, but

still everyone could afford to pay for housing and communal services and other basic services, without serious damage to wallets. now with this difficulty, in order to somehow reduce costs, robert has to control electricity consumption. i don’t want to overpay for what i don’t use, so i always unplug the tv and kettle at night. it is clear that you can’t turn off the refrigerator, but, for example, the same router for the internet at night it is quite possible to de-energize, in addition, we almost never use a dryer, and we only look at shirts on the websites of power engineers write how not to spoil your mood with another electricity bill. for example, when cooking, use the residual heat of the oven and stove or wash clothes at a low temperature for politicians, the agenda has been replenished with one more topic, but it must be correctly connected by the rest. every second woman. in austria, part-time work. this means she has less income. and if she brings up alone

children, which means she can't pay for their school, extended day. she just can't afford it. for the current government, popular unrest is not at all, by the way, in october the country will hold presidential elections and the percentage of dissatisfied may grow. it is not surprising that they decided to support citizens financially, but i heard that entrepreneurs will receive material assistance from the government. but so far i have not dealt with this issue. each adult received 500 euros, each child 250 euros, in addition, additional bonuses were given for payment for electricity, but the protesters believe that this is still not enough. even entrepreneurs support them in this. i have a lot of appliances that work day and night, these are showcases and refrigerators, so as not to lose income. i 'll have to raise food prices, but i ca n't double them. in that case, no one wants to. just the other day the government decided to freeze electricity prices from me. the cost of 1 kw will be even less

than before 10 cents. but this is with one important condition when consuming no more than 2900 kw per year. if this figure turns out to be higher, then the calculation will take place at market prices with this situation, the increase in prices for electricity products, literally everything plus the accumulated fatigue from covid. all this led to the fact that the usually restrained austrians gradually begin to realize the scale of what is happening and conduct a not very restrained conversation with each other, the question is that it is not clear what to prepare for until the end, even more incomprehensible how far. all this can go yulia title dmitry romanov specially for international review vienna austria an alarming program turned out in the spirit of the time. well, at least let's sum up life, affirming the lines of the soviet poet valentin berestov, no, the word peace will remain. it is unlikely that when people will not know the war, after all, what everyone used to call the world will simply call it life. rather, see you in the

international review. remember what you were told when you decided to open a business, custom jewelry. yes, who will buy it, but you did not listen, because you're doing it all wrong. continue. open a free business account in alpha bank and get money for any actions on the mortgage account 60% lower. so it was enough even for children to buy apartments and get a discount on a mortgage. even at a reasonable rate, there are people who always want more than just life, but life with a plus , plus more than a kilometer. plus more power

updated fuel ectoplus from lukoil more pluses more efficiency burn filling a bunch of applications for loans in banks. compare will help fill out just one application for a loan and get approval on the best terms, and the largest banks in comparison. if credit then compare choose better burger king to the menu all over 99 99 20 years ago. our whole family became clients of alpha insurance and moved to another planet, we save money by buying casco for 2,000 rubles. and we get cashback with real money, and we pay in parts according to the alfastrakhovanie subscription connect to the services of the

future for peace of mind in the present first percent. issue a credit card for 120 days without interest and get a year of free service. uralsib perspectives where you are. began

i am very glad that such a wonderful person appeared in my life. you will see the kitchen, even here they could not pick up their textbooks , partly we left a lot of us, we are young and the future of the city is behind us. the couples have already begun to remain cheerful and cheerful, strong guys even during the hostilities.

is it most important for soldiers at the front to feel that they have not been forgotten? here i come to the front line to them. i don't see. he is not afraid, so we are together and this is the most important thing in what we do and anyone can do it. you don't need to know how to play the violin to do this. it is very important. if i am an artist, i should be here where the heart beats now, where the fate of the entire world order is decided. who can never choose. what do they watch tv shows today.

and again serials where no one ever swears? after all, each of them has long had a watch.ru application, which you can watch anywhere and on anything.

the first day of the referendum on accession to russia in the donbass kherson and zaporozhye regions has ended, let me remind you that voting will last until september 27 on the last day will be held at polling stations. in the meantime, for security reasons, members of the election commissions come from afar or collect ballots in the adjacent territories. the ukrainian military, meanwhile, are trying in every possible way to interfere with the expression of will and continue to