today, on the second day of referendums on joining russia, citizens of the dpr of the lpr. residents of the kherson and zaporozhye regions vote very actively. the donetsk people's republic has already expressed its opinion more than 370,000 people. and this means that

more than 20% of the residents of the republic of ya voted for the lpr because of the porozhye region. kherson region for about 15 years, the process of expression of people's will is controlled by russian and international observers from dozens of countries in europe and south america, they note that the voting passes without violations and as openly as possible. on the first day, no complaints were received. the vote on the entry of four regions into russia will last until september 27 inclusive. the mineral assembly and it is taking place in new york have been talking about the reform of the organization for a long time. is it possible to change the security council without russia, the red lines and the limits of the escalation of conflicts, the sovereignty and the right of us to self-determination, the conflict is laid down, he put it in more detail in the international review immediately after a short advertisement. even if the damaged liver is not worries, it’s better to take care of it in time, two active components were able to help relieve inflammation and restore liver cells liver care

with a vengeance of bcs and these are investment ideas for any situation, zero commission for the purchase of securities, favorable exchange rates, convenient application, and 27 more years of experience six past crises more than a thousand financial advisors. well, number one on the market and only three back letters with open the world of bcs investments friends, if you did not find tickets for your favorite stoloto lotteries in post offices. they are always available in stoloton brand stores and on the website. come pick up the winner and gifts. in september, only at stoloto branded points you will receive a ticket as a gift stoloto stay together. pioneers pioneers pioneers buy new furniture in stores that you will be the first to find. vtb team you have more and more

told vtb a new line of furniture. i want to launch a business to start millions of rubles with approval in 5 minutes with a reliable bank. and so will you vtb is helping with business. and why nikolai you yourself are charged for free only in megafon the tariff becomes more profitable every month for free, switch to megafon for maximum benefits on sokolov watches and jewelry, discounts from 60% on everything. choose sokolov right now on wildberries , the prospect is an opportunity to see the new in the old, and with a credit card from uralsib it’s easy to bring it to life and not think about percentages. issue a credit card for 120 days without interest and

get a year of free service, uralsib perspectives where you are. hello live international review in the studio of fyodor lukyanov today in the program of international review events of the week of the chronicles. the global strength test in new york opened to the assembly. un time to comprehend the ongoing inequality inflation and the winter of discontent new barriers in the form of red lines plots of austria the reorganization of the world after yalta what changes await us materials of our program we did not have time to look back, as the concept

of mobilization wartime nuclear deterrence turned from an abstraction into something not at all abstract. but almost a mirage. it seems that life as it was at the beginning of the year, the expected trajectories have changed for the world of the country of each of us, the reversibility of events is not provided, therefore it is advisable to sort it out without unnecessary emotions. what is the specificity of the moment and what's next in the context of an acute international struggle of misunderstanding of the possibility of the opposite side. and so on, and the actual geopolitical analysis of the complex and interesting is not enough, and on the russian side, they just focus on certain advantages that in russia there are, of course, they are. but,

nevertheless, there is also an underestimation of the american capabilities of what america is actually capable of doing today. here we have the culmination of this whole ukrainian conflict. and what is happening is, in fact, a gradual shift. these are asymmetries, a symmetrical conflict; the balance of power is changing; it is changing due to the active involvement of the west in almost everything today, what to do? ukraine, in addition to landing alive, this is all done by the forces of living ukrainians, but everything else already exists, and therefore, so to speak, this symmetry, which was, a certain advantage for russia, it also leaves the conflict turns into a symmetrical one in this situation as well. given that there is this, this is an underestimation of both sides, this leads to an escalation. and the further, the greater the degree of tension of the current military-political crisis.

it is difficult to compare with something that we saw, of course, the cold war was rich in exacerbations, but it lasted a long time and people got used to it . the real most terrible in the history of mankind and in consciousness. there was, if i may say so, the correct scale of threats and dangers, what they are afraid to avoid, and that the coming alluvial year 2022 was a shock, because in three decades everyone believed in eternal peace, it almost arrived, the universal interconnection is extremely beneficial for the majority. well, yes, contradictions are growing from socio-economic to geopolitical, but they will be resolved, however, they are resolved, alas, as this usually happens in the world of states and people on the daily task is not to go to the red line, beyond which is either the unknown, or, on the contrary, a

terrible predestination. the red line or red line is a term that means the limits of patience of one of the parties, and its origin is often disputed, they mention the 1928 agreement of the same name on the division of the oil industry in the middle east or recall the red scale on car instruments. this is in english in french they say about the yellow line. perhaps this came from the yellow color of the road markings, which was in france up to 72 years. in england, they recall the events of the crimean war of 1854, in order to repel the attack of the russian cavalry under a balaclava, the commander of the ninety-third scottish infantry regiment ordered the soldiers to line up not in four lines, but in two fronts of the attack; there were not enough soldiers, but the maneuver allowed the army to stretch out, war correspondent times williams, described a regiment

of englishmen in red uniforms. a thin red line on bristling steel and although ras was not present, at these events the expression entered into english has become a cultural phenomenon. there is another term that means deadline or deadline. this expression came from the first concentration camp in the history of mankind, better known as anderson wilskaya prison, organized by southerners during the american civil war, its population was three times the estimated figure of 10,000 people. the camp was surrounded by towers, which were created by shooting through the perimeter. it was called dudline for everyone who tried to run sentries fired, without warning there are stories that some could not stand the terrible conditions of detention and ended in suicide. they climbed over the fence and found themselves in a dead zone. draw

red lines so that it would be impossible not to notice them. or even more so to ignore the special art, let's talk with our kind, comrade dmitry trennin in the present doka and in matters of international security. good afternoon. well, we have entered into a major international crisis , an international military-political crisis. it seems that a little forgot the instructions for safety precautions, as it were, to remember, well, generally speaking about safety precautions, as it still existed, it was intended not for periods of crisis, but for a period of more or less calm, when it was necessary for en, just to ensure that the other side correctly calculated and read your signals. here is where the conflict in syria for example, is the premiere is here is an example of such things. now we

are in a territory where there is no safety equipment, in principle, because we find dangers in the territory and here, uh, red lines that were drawn by the russian side by the americans. well, let's just say that it is not very respected, moreover, as i understand their line. their own line is to keep moving them constantly testing and moving them. in general, in the american, here are, uh, the rule books on which the world is based our red line. no, so the only thing that can stop. uh, the united states is in this situation. this is the fear of your own fear. er, next step. that's it, there's nothing else. do fear judging all over or not? or it is skillfully hidden, because , well, i think we both have this experience in the

last month and repeatedly and informally our american colleagues said that, well, we thought. you can really pose a threat, so to speak, but in fact it is a complete bluff, therefore. why should we limit ourselves? the other day, literally, the khodja bank with a well- known past military leader said that it means they are ready to destroy the black sea fleet there if these weapons are used. what should be done? and is it possible to do something so that these vera's red lines are back, this is how they would perform. well, i think there is little, what can be done to bring them back. uh, i'm back to the idea of ​​fear again, because there's nothing else to hold our opponent back. if you can't speak seriously. i think the american strategy of strategically defeating russia a is based on the belief that russia, uh, hmm, won't use nuclear weapons. what is she either? cares

or considers that the destruction of civilization is still too high a price for maintaining its positions and here. in my opinion, there is a potentially fatal miscalculation for all mankind, because i have putin’s phrase from the eighteenth year that we don’t need a world without russia, it somehow stuck, and i constantly remember it, but i don’t think that to it is also taken seriously by many people in the united states for example. well, the whole experience. uh observation. for e. vladimir putin had to be convinced that he almost never says a word just like that, but, apparently, he is not convinced. well seen

here, probably too big. or more precisely too much temptation to use the current situation in ukraine for, if you like, a solution to the russian problem, as the german problem disappeared as a result of the second world war. from the european landscape and why not? can the russian problem disappear from the western horizon? and here, in my opinion, our colleagues took a bite of his business. and move forward towards the collision. now i will create a new situation. in the case of a favorable outcome for the organizers of the outcome of the referendums, the russian border will be officially changed and respectively. uh, those words that

our officials always say about the use of nuclear weapons, look, read the doctrine. but, if you read the doctrine based on the new frontiers, what does this mean? well, i think that , firstly, the territory of the russian federation has long been subjected to strikes, and ukrainian strikes, but a strike at the suggestion of the americans and nato, uh, with the help of weapons that were provided by the united states of the nato countries in this sense, the kherson region, nothing will happen differ from the republic of crimea from the belgorod region of kursk and possibly other regions of russia . where can ukrainian arrivals fly to? our doctrine says that nuclear weapons can be used if there is a threat to the existence of the state. uh-huh no, some kind of projectile will fly into russian

territory. yes, and the threat to the existence of states. here e! evaluate and decide does this or that action of the enemy threaten the existence of the state? it is the duty of the supreme commander in chief. but i will say more in my opinion. many people in the united states and in europe. well, in europe it's much less so, but in the united states, uh, they're probably considering. nuclear exchange of nuclear strikes in the european theater of war that is, not only ukraine but wider, as something, and ukraine, of course, as something, in principle, some. and the main thing here, in my opinion, if we make nuclear weapons to turn

nuclear weapons into an effective instrument of deterrence in the specific ukrainian situation , is to convince the united states that the strike will follow on the territory of the united states because the strike on the territory of ukraine, in general, will not stop the strike on the territory of europe, will not be considered as critical critical dangers. but hitting the united states is a different matter. but i say it again over the past few decades after the end of the cold war, the opinion has been that this is what constituted the greatest fear during the cold war. this is an exchange of massive nuclear nuclear strikes between nuclear superpowers ussr by the united states. this is now already hmm history, no one will return to this, and nuclear weapons, again with it, are reduced to the level of use on e-e maximum in the theater of war, and so

in the theater of operations. nuclear weapons did not immediately become a deterrent after world war ii, they were perceived as another way of conducting hostilities already in october 1945 , the us military began working on a secret plan for a totality nuclear strike. now some experts call this plan a nuclear one. a bluff desire to create the illusion of a large number of atomic bombs in the pentagon's arsenal, but in fact there were only a few of them at that time, although after the entry into the korean war of the so-called chinese volunteers, the general. macarthur demanded that 30-50 atomic bombs be dropped on the border with china, they were supposed to create a radioactive search that would isolate korea. truman refused, fearing the ussr would enter the war, but publicly announced on november 30, 1950, that the use of

nuclear weapons in korea might have had an effect. rather the opposite. france openly expressed the indignation of great britain, france, and other states of western europe joined them. they were frightened by moscow's response to its tu-4 planes, a copy of the american b-29s with nuclear bombs did not reach the united states, but could easily reach london and paris on the impossibility of a retaliatory strike by the ussr, by the way, was built a new american nuclear war plan drop-shot change estimates forced the korean war on april 12, 1951. a large group of b-29 bombers. supported by hundreds fighters, was about to strike at the bridge over the yelujiang river, it was supplying korea from china, 36 soviet jet fighters rose in alarm in less than 20 minutes of battle. they destroyed dozens of american aircraft, without losing a single one of their own

, more than a hundred american pilots were captured in the press. the president was dubbed black thursday, and the corridor along the alley of mogs river, poured into this area, was banned. with the development of jet fighter aviation, it became clear that in a nuclear war, most likely, everyone american fortresses. they will be shot down even before they reach the combat course. in addition, by the fifty- sixth year of the ussr, their own bombers appeared capable of reaching the territory of the united states. a year later, the ussr ruled the successful test of the world's first intercontinental ballistic missile. so there is a problem for this when the russian president seeks to contain the enemy by direct or indirect references to nuclear weapons. the enemy interprets this, at least publicly

, as a threat to use nuclear weapons. moreover, the threat of the use of nuclear weapons falls into the western concept of warfare, when failures on the e, front, if during a war using only conventional weapons are compensated by the use of nuclear weapons, they attribute this doctrine to us, yes, while it is quite possible, that the blow will follow not at a specific theater of operations, but at a certain distance from it, well, it’s really logical that, if many are trying to draw analogies with the caribbean kris, which in my opinion now. absolutely incorrectly, another situation, but if you really try to return, that's uh hmm that way of escalating to solve the problem, then there must be a direct direct threat from the dual-nuclear powers. they are as mediocre as ours. but from all

that we are discussing. uh, in general, it follows that this is a funnel, from which there is no way out yet, that is, absolutely linear logic. it turns out without the terrible horror that everyone will suddenly feel in american and so on. and how is there a way out of this spiral, but i think that we are in many ways a unique case. to be honest, i can’t recall another situation that even remotely resembled the current ukrainian crisis, indeed, the funnel is drawing in not only us, but also the americans, and we are going. in general, we are on the road to a head-on collision. for us, this is an existential question, because we are talking not only about the fate of ukraine. but what is much more important for us than the fate of russia, and in the most fundamental sense of the word? in the mid

-nineties, mobilization was resorted to during the balkan conflict in the summer of 1995 alone, the ministry of internal affairs of serbia put into service about 10,000 refugees and returned them to the front in croatia and bosnia and herzegovina in 2008 against the backdrop of an escalation of the armed conflict. general mobilization was announced in south ossetia georgia, the latter, according to various estimates, involved in the combat zone from 60 to 100,000 reservists in september 2020 due to the events in nagorno- karabakh, general mobilization for the first time in history declared martial law to armenia nagorno-karabakh repeatedly. mobilization was carried out in libya, where for more than ten years two authorities have reigned, the parliament elected by the people controls the east, and

the commander of the livi, formed with the support of the un and the european union, the government of the west in january last year. the national army of caliph hafft declared jihad and general mobilization in order to resist the actions of turkey, which allowed the military to be sent to the lily, israel generally exists in conditions of partial mobilization almost from the moment of its formation in the country there is no both men and women are subject to conscription for the contract army. the backbone of the armed forces is the personnel army, but in the event of a threat, all citizens subject to mobilization must stand up due to this during the arab israeli wars, the ratio of advancing and defending forces has never even reached two to one, therefore, israel over and over again won in the confrontation with the arab states. for the united states, these are issues rather of political prestige issues of leadership issues

position in the world system of the global is so big, yes, but even if we allow, if we allow, uh, the success of russia in ukraine and the failure of the american strategy of defeating russia, this will not be fatal for the position of the united states in the world they have in that part of the world where they dominate, they have no rivals, on the contrary, i would say that the potential defeat of the united states in ukraine could lead to even greater rallying. uh those countries that president putin called tallit around the united states because i just can’t imagine myself otherwise , well then, the last question. he must be so active. eh, now, if we ignore the understandable bitterness with which we all comment on the situation, how did they grind the figures in order

to see who is now ruling us? i have us peace. eh, people have lost, therefore, a sense of reality, it is clear that there is some share here . well, such excitement, but seriously, if we talk, has something really changed in the perception of political leaders, and what was before, uh, added confidence in understanding the border? and that it only changed or that there was no big war for a long time. i think the feeling of fear has disappeared. generally speaking, the world is based on fear. about nothing else. therefore, if fear disappears, then the world is in danger. and in the west, in the united states, first of all, but also in europe , fear has disappeared, otherwise the europeans would have begun to react to the shelling of the zaporozhye nuclear

power plant. and i think the lack of fear and uh, i would add the case of the europeans, the lack responsibility for their safety, because it is completely and finally before the united states of america create a situation in which we, uh, well, there was a very famous book, uh, dedicated to the centenary of the first world war, uh, blind, with closed eyes, so to speak, uh uh, heading towards disaster. i have the impression that now, at least in europe, we see people who have closed their eyes and go, uh, in the direction of the cliff, the direction of the abyss. and it's very, very dangerous. so bring back fear, and biden knows the truth. i think biden,

well, it's hard for me to talk about abayne as a person. if we talk about the collective baidan, that is, in the white house. i think that the white house thinks that they, you know, that's how they said about clinton, that she uh, i don't know how to say smartis in russian anyway. yes, he himself is not the smartest, but the most like that, uh! well, he is a head taller than everyone, so he thinks better than anyone. yes, they have the impression that they think better than anyone in the world per head for two and sodium, and so further and so on, and russia is no match for them. speaking of red lines, by the way. how did we start this conversation? they were perhaps in a relationship between more or less equal quantities. and when, on the one hand, uh, so to speak, there are superpowers, and on the other hand, uh, the remnants of the former superpower, from the point of view of the united states

, there can be no question of any e even nominal equality. thank you, dmitry was training with us. after advertising, we will continue, and the system will form a subscriber. perspective is an opportunity to see something new in old, and with a credit card from uralsib it’s easy to bring it to life and not think about interest 120 days without interest and get a year of free service uralsib prospects, where you were 20 years ago and we will settle insurance claims online,

including through the osago application directly at the scene of an accident , alfastrakhovanie, connect to the services of the future for peace of mind in the present. did you know that you can get a loan at zero percent online and immediately think on the card, this is impossible. maybe. choose a loan on favorable terms. friends, if you did not find tickets for your favorite stoloto lotteries at post offices, they are always available in stoloton branded stores and on the website. come collect your prizes and gifts. in september, only at stoloto's branded outlets, you will receive a ticket as a gift stoloto stay together for me and you and for each cash loan with a fixed rate of 8.9 each is an opening. take a closer look at the burger king menu for everything 99 99, the vtb team will offer a solution at the school

. dad will have to live together without gatherings on fridays, refuse avocados and his snowmobile road. honey, we live in the city center with a card for every day from a reliable bank. order a free card from vtb and get 1,000 rubles. cashback 2% for everything you are used to and utility bills without commission. order a free vtb card right now, switch to vtb, everything will work out. keep a close eye on the first violations of the prostate if you get up more than twice at night, and palasa is an innovative drug for the early treatment of prostate adenoma bkz investment world is an investment for any situation, zero commission on the purchase of securities, a favorable exchange rate,

a convenient application, and another 27 years of experience six past crises more than a thousand financial advisers. well, number one on the market and only three letters back. open the world of investment bcs first class did not close. buy new equipment in stores on avito, things that you will be the first to have. remember what you were told when you decided to open a business, bionic prostheses. it's very difficult, but you did not listen, because you are doing everything wrong. continue. open a free business account in alpha bank and get money for any actions on the account. it's always interesting how it all starts. now everyone will see the producers of good things

want and most importantly. new york is hosting a high-level week of the un general assembly the atmosphere is inflated, but perhaps not as much as one of joseph biden's statements might be expected. even aroused the approval of russia, the us president spoke in favor of increasing the number of permanent members of the un security council in moscow said, well, yes, and we have long been happy about the same sudden coincidence prematurely. no one is opposed to reforming the security council so that it corresponds to modern

realities, but how the current five was formed according to an understandable principle, the winners of the second world war, and now the criteria for population by size of the economy by region do not agree. and if suddenly they get into a quarrel, how to use them for these discussions, in fact, there is one question about the rule, which remains quite exclusive. no veto privileges in the un security council have only 5 permanent members, these are the winners in world war ii united states united kingdom russia france and china charter does not directly mention. veta, but it says that all decisions, except for procedural ones, should be made by consensus, when it first appeared, most countries took the side of washington on all issues. that is why, even before the end of the war, the ussr wanted to join

the un not as one state, but by all union republics roosevelt said in response to this that the united states would then allow all its states to join the un as a result, in addition to the ussr, the organization also included the ukrainian and belarusian republics of the forty-sixth to 69 years, the majority in sambeza, where in addition to five permanent members there were six more temporary ones, remained on the side of the united states to block the resolutions of this majority, the soviet union imposed 93% of all branches, by the way, the resolution, according to which un troops intervened in the korean war was accepted without the ussr after the appearance of the prc in the forty-ninth year. moscow demands that beijing be given a seat in the security council. the rest of the council members refuse and then moscow boycotted without the korean resolution adopted without taking into account the opinion of the soviets, the protests of the ussr had no effect and in august moscow returned to the

joint. however, in the sixties, the western majority fell apart as a result of decolonization , the composition of the un increased new, developing countries. they often voted against western initiatives in the seventy-first year, china took the place of taiwan, and the composition of the security council expanded to 10 temporary members as a result, in the seventieth to ninety-first years, the united states imposed 56% of the light and the soviet union is less than any of the western powers after the end of the cold war in the security council came a short period of harmony from may 1990 to may 1993 right, the veto was not used not a single time. while this is the longest period in the history of the un, weta is a valuable invention of the second half of the last century, designed to replace the world war before in the face of actions unacceptable to some of the

great powers that used force after the forty- fifth year, it became possible to declare disagreement and the rest took it as a red light. true, there is an opinion that the system did not work because everyone suddenly began to respect international law. it's just that the permanent members of the security council quickly became the owners of atomic weapons and it was not the un charter that stopped them, but the fear of inadvertently provoking a nuclear power. now the fear has diminished, and the former balance of power and restraint that is associated with it is gone. the league of nations emerged in 1919 after the first world war, it was supposed to promote peace and security, taking into account interests of the entente and its allies, 63 countries became its members, but nevertheless, it was based on the principle of maintaining

order by the winners of the first world new world. the charter of the league of nations declared the need to limit armaments and proclaimed the principle of mutual guarantee of the territorial integrity of the participating countries, but the organization did not fulfill its purpose in 1933 germany and japan announced their withdrawal from the league of nations and in the thirty-seventh italy followed their example. the league of nations did not respond to hitler's, anschluss of austria or partition czechoslovakia well, the ussr also expelled its ranks for the war with finland. the league the nation replaced the un about, the creation of which in february forty-fifth was agreed in yalta by roosevelt churchill and stalin , 3 months later, representatives of fifty states gathered in san francisco for a conference that lasted 2 months. and now i am obliged and it is a great honor for me to announce a vote on the approval of the charter

of the united nations it was then that the main organs of the un were created, the general assembly and the security council trusteeship council the international court of justice and the secret participants of the conference prepared and adopted a charter. in addition, the un received its own peacekeeping forces, which the league of nations did not have. these are the un military contingents from the units of the participating countries, which are subordinate to the organization to ensure security. they can use coercion, it can be peacekeeping, a show of force, or a blockade for 70 years. during its existence, the peacekeeping forces conducted about 40 operations, but it could not oppose anything american invasion of yugoslavia or iraq. were norms related to spheres of influence, what was it called? this was practically always the case at the

yalta conference. it was more informal, but it was also and it also prevented the possibility of war. and of course, there were norms of non-interference in the internal affairs of sovereignty, and on this basis there were certain e, and compromises and cooperation were built and we remember how it was during the cold war, especially when the most dangerous periods since the 1960s and especially in the 1970s, space for cooperation has already emerged and on strategic issues a factor of economic interdependence has emerged. russia has become more and more dependent on europe, respectively, here on russia, and this has created the fact that sociologists are described by the state of late modern everything, as they say, all the contradictions of the universe are in force, but there is a certain understanding of how to act and how not to act, and

these are conditions they created reinforced kind. this right of veto, about which we are talking, this informal side is the formal legal one, and the informal one is this understanding. e among the great powers, how to behave towards each other and how to behave towards the defeated powers, and then it all collapsed, the cold war was still such a symmetrical order. this symmetry was held first at the end of the second world war, then nuclear symmetry arose. and after he says that the crisis had a clear feeling that us symmetrical military potentials, including especially the nuclear area, and then it collapsed and now except for nuclear symmetry. no, feelings. in any case, there is definitely no feeling on the american side that the symmetrical order is an asymmetric rivalry. the former insurance

war has also disappeared somewhere. time has passed, and uh, there is no such fear, there is no more the old ideological antagonism. but this is what is not. this is not a cold war. in this sense, and what we have today is that we have rivalry, rivalry of powers first of all for making the world order such that would meet our interests and preferences, first of all, and the planet does not play in this either. already previous roles. the topic of the abolition of the right century or the demolition of one of its owners, namely russia, pops up regularly. this is not possible without actually dismantling the system. un nuclear deterrent. of course it's not going anywhere. but as we discussed today, its effectiveness has decreased compared to the cold war, and an attempt to create a precedent for punishing nuclear

superpowers. it will also change the world disposition, it is better not to experiment further. it is the most representative assembly of the political subjects of the planet for three quarters of a century, the number of member countries has grown almost four times, the collapse of the empire and the self-determination of peoples had an explosive nature . and where there are borders, there is a potential conflict of changing borders. the question is always explosive, sometimes they agree on lovingly. but this exception to the rule border disputes cause sharp contradictions are usually military. land borders in the form of straight lines were often drawn by the british and french colonialists in the deserts of north africa, the demarcation was not carried out. yes, and the lines themselves are conditional, a different situation

in british india in 1947, in its place, the indian union of pakistan arose and later bangladesh was divided on religious grounds, and referendums were to be held in the disputed territories. ultimately. this led to conflicts. the most famous around the camera was even before the end of the first world war. it is clear that the ottoman empire is losing its possessions in the middle east in may 1916, a secret agreement appeared with the agsa. pico great britain received the territories where the jordanian israel france is now located and the north-eastern part of turkey, the northern cancer, syria ivana russia were to go to the turkish straits. following the revolution of the seventeenth year, she withdrew from the war. the promise of british intelligence agent thomas edward lawrence to create an arab state in exchange for the support of british troops. not even mentioned in europe

an example of the establishment of borders is the curzon line, a demarcation line between poland and the ero of the ussr, which was proposed by the british foreign secretary in 1920. she did not fully take into account the limits of the ethnic settlement of ukrainians and to the west of it. there are several ukrainian regions of the border left. often passed not only in countries, but also in cities after the second world war it was divided, berlin after the collapse of the ussr on the territory of estonia turned out to be half of the city of narva the russian part is called ivangorod and the authorities in belgium, the netherlands peacefully divided the town of borem , both belgian and dutch municipal services operate there. and it is only by signs that one can understand who owns the territory. the border was often redrawn, sometimes radically, however, there have been shifts in this issue in the era of

international institutions for changing borders. moreover , a very correct installation began to be considered unacceptable by force. but institutions, as it turned out , are not eternally tied to their time, and the essence of politics is unchanged, especially since the 20th century laid in fact, an insoluble contradiction, the very concept of sovereignty the concept of sovereignty is ambiguous ; the first meaning is when one ethnic group forms a national state and this is the principle of national self-determination and international law considers it as a legitimate principle of territorial integrity on the other hand. one nation is not in the ethnic sense in the civil sense, one territory, which is indivisible in the 20th century. the emphasis shifted first to one side, then to the other side between the world wars, the principle dominated self-determination. after 1945, the point of view prevailed. if we recognize everyone who wants to decide for herself, the world will be extremely unstable, that

is, territorial integrity is more important. now it has swung again in favor of recognizing the claim to self-determination, despite the dangerous precariousness of such a world, but i repeat the principle of sovereignty does not give a clear understanding of how to act, everything depends very much on the circumstances. and that means, to a large extent, unpredictable, including he put it, clearly, but there is still the will of the people. iota is necessary respect. this is a very difficult question. if you respond to all manifestations of the will of the people, the level of instability will increase sharply in many countries, there is a minority with areas of residence that overlap. the world community is all states. ideally, they should have clear and stable criteria for recognizing the right to self-determination and always. for an active diplomatic effort, well yes, it is an extremely difficult political task how and when to respond to people's requests when something is

not clear. refer to international law lawyers will say and they will do it right, but what if it bumps into a wall of great-power ambitions, when, from the point of view of the theory of realism in international relations, international law primarily ends where the question of the balance of power begins, for example, we are talking about a large country that violates whose is sovereignty. take, for example, the american invasion of iraq under a fictitious pretext and where there was international law, when it became clear that through the security council he could not carry out the operation by the united states just they said that they would act on their own, because it was their law. the law, of course, is not good enough for leading powers, and therefore they are such that they limit the use of force, respect someone else's sovereignty and violate anyone's rights. i hope that the emergence of a multipolar world will help restore international law, because there

will be more balance, the annexation of territories, in theory, should also comply with international legal norms, but in reality, what is international law when it comes to real policy and specific goals? who can punish israel for the nexia of the dutch heights or morocco for the annexation, western sahara the syrian dutch heights went to israel during the six-day war of the sixty-seventh year, along with east jerusalem, in july of the eightieth, the knesset passed a law according to which the city was declared the single and indivisible capital of israel a year later the israeli parliament annexed the dutch heights. both decisions were not accepted by the un security council conflict over western sahara over the duration is not much inferior to the arabs of israel in the mid-seventies, after the departure of the spanish colonialists, the struggle for the independence of the region was led by the front, the palisario supported

algeria fighting. they continued until the ninety- first year and stopped only after he sent a peacekeeping mission there, the fighters of the front, the polis yells, proclaimed an independent state, the sahara, the arab democratic republic of sandra, he does not recognize and does not sadri, nor the annexation of the national team. kingdom of morocco they control approximately 80% of western sahara and the rest of the front, donald trump's palisario signed a declaration recognizing the dutch heights as part of israel in march 2019. this happened during his meeting at the white house with israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu. this step was condemned by the government of all arab states . russia and the european union held mass protest demonstrations throughout the region, but there were no serious political and economic steps against the united states by the arabs, and a year later trump

signed a declaration recognizing the sovereignty of moroka. on western sahara. everything went almost unnoticed. but a year later, the sovereignty of the kingdom over western sahara was recognized by 18 more countries, including the emirates of jordan. when we experts hear accusations that the recognition of some territories. this is something unheard of. we just smile because we know how many violations there are. the same kind was on the part of those who now accuse others of violations of the following thought is introduced. if you acted like israel or morocco, that is, you took away something that belongs to another and are able to hold. it is under control for a long time. then it’s normal, israel is under the patronage of the united states morocco under the patronage of france so that everything turns out to be possible and the point is not in international law, but in the alignment of forces and interests to regulate world politics.

to the state of a well-oiled mechanism. no one can neither right nor force, anarchy is the natural state of the world environment. any historian of international relations will confirm the question of how this can be treated in the spirit of the league of siers catch moment, but you can increase the prudence of understanding? sheer risks the second would be better in europe , russian gas turned out to be very economically worrying, and played an important role. european addiction drawing of bulgaria by nakrista komarnicki for the newspaper sega hello, my name is olaf and this is a man and i am addicted to russian gas. hi aries , the rest of the davemand theme of the game of thrones does not let go of american artists . europe is written on the house and on the pipe. it's clear nord stream

winter is a close look at the energy crisis from pakistan come on come on don't be lazy, says one man to another. let there be light, inflation is written on a giant stone michael ramirez about the economic difficulties of the united states on the eve of the midterm elections good news, a man says gasoline prices fell slightly chinese english-language newspaper china delly, and some features of the application of sanctions are a nested doll , understandable and familiar image, but in europe as it appears. difficult about everyday life one of the most prosperous european countries in austria, a report by julia hitl, our life will become so dear that we what we had before will not be available, we will not be able to pay bills, we will not be able to buy

food for ourselves. is it right that the boiling point of the people began to take to the streets the other day across austria there were mass demonstrations demanding a reduction in prices by the organizers. this time the unions. they say that they gathered about 30,000 citizens for the rally. i have a family of five last year we spent almost 3,000 kw, which cost us 1,400 euros together with gas. in september we received a letter from our energy supplier that now we have to pay twice as much. and this, of course, is not very good news. life in austria before it could not be called cheap, but still everyone could afford to pay for housing and communal services and other basic services, without serious damage to wallets. now with this difficulty, in order to somehow reduce costs, robert has to control electricity consumption. i don’t want to overpay for what i don’t use, so i

always unplug the tv and kettle at night. it is clear that you can’t turn off the refrigerator, but, for example, the same router for the internet at night, it is quite possible to turn off the power, in addition, we almost never use a dryer, and we only use shirts on the sites of power engineers write how not to spoil your mood with another electricity bill. for example, when cooking, use the residual heat of the oven and stove or wash clothes at a low temperature for politicians, the agenda has been replenished with one more topic, but it must be correctly connected by the rest. every second woman. in austria, part-time work. and that means her income is less. and if she's raising kids alone, that means she can't pay for them to school, extended day. she just can't afford it. for the current government, popular unrest is not at all, by the way, in october the country will hold presidential elections and the percentage of dissatisfied may grow. it is not surprising that they decided to

support citizens financially, but i heard that entrepreneurs will receive material assistance from the government. but so far i have not dealt with this issue. each adult received 500 euros each child 250 each. in addition, they gave out additional bonuses for paying for electricity, but the protesters believe that this is still not enough. even entrepreneurs support them in this. i have a lot of appliances that work day and night, these are showcases and refrigerators, so as not to lose income. i 'll have to raise food prices, but i ca n't double them. in that case, no one wants to. just the other day the government decided to freeze electricity prices from me. the cost of 1 kw will be even less, than before 10 cents. but this is with one important condition when consuming no more than 2900 kw per year. if this figure turns out to be higher, then the calculation will take place at market prices with this situation, the increase in prices for electricity products, literally everything plus the accumulated fatigue from

covid. all this led to the fact that the usually restrained austrians gradually begin to realize the scale of what is happening and conduct a not very restrained conversation with each other, the question is that it is not clear what to prepare for until the end, even more unclear how far. all this can go yulia title dmitry romanov specially for international review vienna austria an alarming program turned out in the spirit of the times. well, at least let's sum up life, affirming the lines of the soviet poet valentin berestov, no, the word peace will remain. it is unlikely that when people will not know the war, after all, what everyone used to call the world will simply call it life. rather, see you in the international review.

residents of the dacha village of markonievo, like all normal people, want to spend evenings watching tv with their families. with electricity causes risk fair anger that's how it happens look? songs from the bottom of my heart good evening everyone so, not everyone has run yet.

turnout high violation no second day of referendums in the donbass in the liberated territories, how everything goes, and what international observers say kiev is trying with all its might to disrupt the referendum in the donbass by wooing the frontier people made their choice under rocket fire, but the violence of the strike and five settlements of the dpr including donetsk