life here they say they are suppliers. here , of course, e is necessary. uh, this is a situation throughout the country with this situation , the authorities of the regions will deal with it. they promise that they will join the common cause and businessmen across the country help to provide the mobilized with everything necessary. if only they did not need anything and fulfilled their military house of conduct. this is a tax program . hello russian tax policy and practice is moving from international integration to domestic customization this process discussed at the moscow international financial forum. however, experts. we came to the conclusion that international integration does not end at all. it just changes, so what will this setting look like. and what still remains with us about this, we will talk with mikhail orlov today with us in just a couple of minutes, but so far, traditionally, a few numbers. 58%

of russian citizens at least once in their lives received a tax deduction in most cases, we are talking about property deductions among those who have never returned part of the previously paid taxes approximately equally. those who do not know about such a possibility or consider that the amount returned from the budget is carrying the effort to formalize the deduction of a joint study by sber insurance and the media holding. rent-call the country has reduced the number of states providing the military from russia with data on foreign accounts of russians in automatic mode, the swiss authorities have made a temporary decision. suspend the exchange of such information in this way if switzerland falls into annually, an updated list of countries with which automatic tax exchange is not supported, it is regulated in russia by 538,000 or 30%

, the number of administrative cases for the collection of tax fees from a chameleon 330,000 increased against one million 790,000 a year. earlier, such data was cited by the head of the supreme court of russia, vyacheslav lebedev, while it is noted that annually there is no tax debt from citizens. orlov head of the department of tax and legal practice consulting companies mikhail hello. hello. mikhail in september hosted the moscow international financial forum. there an entire panel discussion was devoted to. here is such a transitional theme has developed. based on the results of this discussion, i have a feeling that we are not giving up on international integration at all. so larisa i also have the same feeling, at least in terms of the tone of the developments in the tax in the tax sphere. we will not, probably, unquestioningly follow those

recommendations or requirements that are placed on us. may come, er, from our foreign colleagues. filmed as they came before, so i can not judge it. but i can say that throughout. i think twenty years. we always tuned or improved. earlier, you know, i even remember in 1998, when i was preparing the first part of the tax code. there were wonderful articles such as the twentieth fortieth article. dedicated to transfer pricing and already then in order to better implement our national legislation, and then this practice, uh, borrowing the best tax developments and foreign practices. she began to expand. i think that today we are in a situation where we can simply peek and borrow everything that is necessary for our economy and abroad. well, as for peeping and saying that the russian federation has offered a lot of interesting solutions in recent years regarding the administration of tax in

administration using it tools. well, here russia was absolutely at the forefront. i think the tax office demonstrated very interesting tools that well, i can e worked a lot with strange cis there and mature can with e kazakhstan and i know that when she is at the construction site of the tax administration and they say that they are having a dialogue with the federal tax service with in order to implement this practice in their tax systems. and this is true, if you have already started talking about countries, although we will talk about this. this is also an international practice, and, as far as i understand, it is not something that is not being closed now, it is very actively developed. well, i think that over the past time there, we really have an integration agreement is another matter, that, well, in my opinion, they are not always implemented in practice, and i can say, as a person who worked a lot with business in the post-soviet space, that very often we have on it those international treaties that russia has concluded. well, in this case, with kazakhstan . and today, of course, integration processes, well,

they definitely do not weaken. don't know about the amplify, but not a decided to transfer their e, headquarters to these cis countries in order to maintain some kind of opportunity to work with their foreign suppliers. and here is the process. it should be that money turnover between countries should, at least in my opinion , should increase, and then the question arises. do we still need to refine something so that somewhere even improve and strengthen this cooperation. so i just wanted to ask the question that well, in order for all countries to read treaties in the same way. well, i think that there should be some kind of single platform a platform where one could simply understand what is written today in the regulatory law somehow on taxation, but when we are in russia we understand what is. and there is the ministry of finance, the federal tax service, which , in my opinion, has no such platform, at the eu level. well, or at least this site. where

can the taxpayer turn to, so that they explain it to him, and the border deal between, for example, the russia of kazakhstan between russia and armenia, if we can create such site, and all taxpayers will understand that they can apply. e to some, but to other countries, nevertheless. i would like to talk more about the techniques that we attribute to european business. i was present at the discussion, and this is a hell of a zveshling leading that european business is completely leaving our site. well, i don’t think it’s possible to say that all european business there, uh, are leaving the russian economy. yes, of course, we see examples of companies in that jurisdiction, uh, i mentioned chinese indian uh on the form of this, investments are willing to replace, but the question is that many including european american companies are still. these are interests on the part of our, and asian eastern e,

investors, colleagues, and we need to finalize. including an agreement with these countries so that they feel comfortable discussing this issue and talking, and comparing india and china. the conditions that are now provided to investors from these countries with the conditions that once were for european investors investors from countries a southeast asian uh investor is definitely looking forward to some. support or at least the creation of a favorable investment climate in russia for their investments and if the mask is now ready to consider investment options, including in those objects that i leave today european investors, but at the same time rightfully deservedly say that the agreement of the russian indian is not so attractive, but not so much a well-wisher, probably a converter and when it comes. uh, an indian businessman invests in this asset, then its dividends will be taxed at a

ten percent rate, and taxes. and at that time it was discussed that these conditions, which were once offered to investors from european countries , are disproportionately better than what we now offer a partner from a southeastern country asia but this is still a lot of work that everyone will like. what are the priority tasks that must be solved now in order for this perestroika to take place in a quality manner? we agreed that this is completely international integration, while russia must protect its interests. so what to do? i think that the ministry of finance of the government years ago took a rather interesting course towards revising the agreement precisely from the point of view of how much agreement it would avoid in the current conditions, dialogue with european jurisdictions is largely difficult. but i think that this is the same, uh, vector that was designated 2 years ago. how much e agreement with those states suits us, and how much

they contribute to the inflow of investments in russia and for these cross-border operations to take place. i think it's obvious to you. i think that this is a very correct decision in terms of timing. in the main directions of the tax policy of the government. she outlined the vector of development of relations with belarus. this is very good, but they have these integration processes outside the perimeter. well, the third. i still believe that while developing our domestic russian tax legislation, our internal, what to bring to our russian tax system. thank you very much mikhail orlov, head of the department, tax and legal practice of the consulting company capt, was today discussing tax legislation and tax administration from international integration to internal adjustment in the tax project. see you soon. how

big are the damages? when will it be technically possible to resume gas supplies? head of the republics, donbass against the first head of the donetsk republic