internet for the whole family on mts.ru has never had such a low rate as a loan from alfa-bank. from 4.5% get money today alpha-bank is the best mobile bank. hot crispy favorite meet the legendary french fries in all restaurants delicious and that's it i greet you, dear viewers of channel russia 24 on our author's besogon tv program, today's episode of ours will be devoted to a very interesting interview, in my opinion, a very original individual. this is an interview with andrey fursov. this is

the director of the center for russian studies of the moscow university of the humanities, and the interview yes but was to the newspaper culture. uh, and it seemed to me that it would be interesting for tv viewers to hear it, because , of course, not all of them. e, were able to read this newspaper and get acquainted with this text. i want to make a reservation right away and repeat it again, i read the texts. i read whether this is an interview or some information, but this information, which seems interesting to me, even if it concerns subjects, uh, in which i suppose, or someone from the audience e is not well versed, but we try to trust specialists who discuss these topics. it seems to me that andrei fursov is a specialist and his point of view. it seems interesting to me. so this is called the lot of those who do not have an ideology

picnic on the sidelines of history so the question is it is believed that it was in malta that gorbachev passed everything in quotation marks, how do you see those events? now the answer is fursov's surrender of gorbachev, in fact, the surrender of the socialist camp and the ussr took place on the second third of december 1989 in malta, the final act of a rather long process of interaction of part of the western and parts of the soviet elites, the post-war period in the west, a young and predatory faction took shape, the corporatocracy, we are talking about the bourgeoisie, secret service officials and the like, closely associated with transnational corporations and financial capital. for several decades. they

stubbornly went to power. trying to push. actually monopoly capital, it will be abbreviated as mmc and the related segment of the world. the elite strategy of the corporatocracy in relation to the ussr was fundamentally different from that of mmc groups, that is, groups, and state monopoly capital, the latter, starting from the sixties of the last century, sought to establish a dialogue with the soviet elite and found understanding in this regard. of course, both sides, especially the western ones, were not sincere either, but they strove for dialogue, and in globalist plans, corporatocracy and the place of the ussr in the brave new world. there just wasn't more. this world could not have arisen without the destruction of the ussr. and at the turn of the

seventies and eighties, representatives corporatocracy came to power in the west and launched an offensive against the ussr; here they found allies, or rather counterfeits. in the seventies, a small but very influential soviet segment of the world corporatocracy was formed in the soviet union, where they found themselves, representatives of the nomenclature of the special services of some scientific structures and large shadow companies. if the corporatists of the west sought to push the mmc out of power, then the corporatocrats in the ussr sought to push the caps out of power with the help of the west and change system, turning simply into owners, in the second half of the seventies a team was created to solve this problem, they recruited

narrow-minded conceited people, and most importantly, the corun of the first on the dirty ones , who are easy to manipulate, and in which case it was gorbachev’s team, most which was used in the dark. at the turn of 1988-89, the west intercepted the process of dismantling the socialist system and turned it into the dismantling of the ussr itself and over state formations, the core of which it and it was not for nothing that madeleine albright at that time she was the secretary of state of the united states , bush sr. saw the main merit in the fact that he led the collapse of the soviet empire. the culmination of this leadership was the december meeting in malta . after

visiting the pope, in your opinion, there is some kind of connection between these events. russophobe and soviets op john paul ii, apparently blessed humpbacks for the surrender of historical russia, which the west dreamed of for at least four centuries from the last third of the 16th century in the west, two projects were developing to establish control over russia, protestant england since the 20th century, and also the united states and the catholic holy roman empire of the habsburgs. vatican gorbachev's visit first to the pope. and then to bush sr. he very, very symbolically recorded the surrender. not just the ussr, it was the surrender of historical russia is not clear. as far as gorbachev himself understood this,

but those of his accomplices who had more close contact with the western elites and began to do this before the secretary general, for example, alexander yakovlev he gave himself excellent reports in this. after all , he said in one of his interviews that perestroika did not break the thousand-year-old paradigm of russian history. gorbachevism is the first phase of the word yeltsinism, the second beginning of the 21st century is marked by the contradiction between maintaining the neoliberal course in the economy and turning towards sovereignty in foreign policy, it is clear that this contradiction could not last long, or the question, but russia is preparing for a geopolitical revenge.

the bear will not give up its taiga to anyone. these are the words president. putin's answer. i do not have the feeling that russia is preparing for a geopolitical revenge crimean victoria is certainly an achievement, especially against the background of a quarter of a century of geopolitical retreat, but victoria is forced. this is a pre-emptive reaction to the actions of the enemy of another option. russia simply didn’t have otherwise, the loss of face would be added to the geopolitical defeat, the whole world, including its closest neighbors, would understand that russia can be wiped off its feet at the same time, crimea is just a point won in a lost russia almost a quarter of a century-old party for ukraine, we were unable to create in ukraine a real pro-russian force of true allies of russia, did not contribute, to put it mildly

, to the emergence in ukraine of mass strata oriented towards russia and the russian world. but the americans of the west as a whole have succeeded in creating anti-russian orcs. these are such evil barbarians among the granazis in the spread of russophobia. zombies of the population this is a very important issue. i have already spoken about this and many people think about it. and we did not deal with ukraine yanukovych, who, as it were, is, so to speak, and to some extent our great ally. just doing robbery. and it was a criminal, by and large, power, but nothing else nearby. we did not bring up and as a result everything, the time that we thought, well, where all the relatives will go, we all know, then, give it here. eh, fat. the burner, conversations, half

of the surname in russia ends in hell, and so on, nothing goes anywhere. they won't get away. all the same, they were together nothing like that for more than 20 years, there was a detailed, calm, neat, but daily job. it led to the fact that even two generations were brought up, consider people who will never turn to russia unless something happens. a pleasant cataclysm that will convince them that this path was wrong, in principle, the wrong one, we read further bear will not give up his taiga to anyone, a wonderful phrase, but words must be followed by deeds, the assertion of full sovereignty requires not only a great-power course in foreign policy, but also the establishment of sovereignty in the economic sphere, first of all financial banking and information, we

have banks directly, banks registered with the tax service of the united states of america, in fact, subsidiaries of branches of the federal reserve system. speculation on the stock exchange how many people with dual citizenship, oh, that we don't know there work work whether it 's inside or outside, but this work is going on, it's still the world system economic financial world. this means that influence, and influence is possible - this, unfortunately, as we see, is not yet in our favor. it is not enough. it looks like economic sovereignty, as far as the media is concerned, the situation in this area today is better than 5-7 years ago during the ukrainian crisis, the state-oriented media suppressed the five-column for the first time in the history of the russian federation and nevertheless. we perfectly

see that the pro-western media, whose point of view almost completely coincides with the point of view of the us state department, but, in fact, is its implementation in our information space. they are still very active. and this means that until the end sovereignty in this area is not provided. pay attention to how the anglo-saxons are fighting, they didn’t give a damn about information sovereignty , they didn’t give a damn about external decency, the last example is the action of the british. against ours, who simply proposed to change the editorial policy under the threat of shutdown. but what the correct russia today allows itself cannot be compared with what, for example, echo of moscow or rain allows you? i'm not talking about the fact that the battle for sovereignty for great power oligarchic financial dependent commodity the system cannot win this important battle for

sovereignty for being a great power, the financially oligarchic, resource-dependent system cannot win once clinton said that the us would allow russia to be, but would not allow it to be a great power. the revenge of russia is the return of great power status, which is impossible on an oligarchic raw material basis. what tasks have to be solved putin is asked historical parallels to defeat no nomads and khazars, like svyatoslav come up with a messianic idea like vasily iii moscow hold the third rome oprichny how ivan the terrible crush the fifth column to create an alternative western way of life based on the idea of ​​social justice, like joseph stalin answer messianic ideas are not invented.

they are born in the struggle during the crisis, the nomads and the khazars, if i understand correctly, the globalists are their allies, or rather their agents in russia are the winner, indeed. it can only be something, like neoprichinina. it is also the conditions for creating a new socio-economic structure based on the principles of social justice, first of all. a fair distribution of the national product is necessary. and it is necessary to start with the constitution on the one hand. it is necessary to bring the reality in accordance with a number of its provisions, for example, that russia is a social state is very important. on the other hand, to remove those provisions that yeltsin's khalui concocted under the dictation of american consultants, for example, and to accept

international law over russian. how that international law is chosen, when it is beneficial to a certain circle in the west, just like that, so calmly, there is no solution. yes, what the difference, we'll figure it out, the main thing is to impose a fight and the world eats it, and smacking it like that, however, it's much easier to say. what to do means a serious and dangerous struggle that requires political will and the identification of group interests with a common national colossally important postulate of the identification of group interests with a common national question you wrote that in order to win the world game, new knowledge and creative special forces are needed, but the drama is that we have no vision of the future. we are offered to revive

the past or the ussr two or orthodoxy autocracy nationality or christian islamic eurasian socialism without e, judicial interest. so what is the russian interest, the answer i had was not creative, but intellectual special forces, the word creative i can’t stand the spirit. everything suddenly became creative, creative manager, creative director. even the creative class has appeared so office plankton calls itself that we do not have an image of the future and, as a result, a strategy to achieve it. no wonder we don't have an ideology to ban it even in the constitution it is written, and the united states has it, and china has it, and they also have it, and other successful states have it without ideology. impossible to articulate. not development goals, nor images of the future are the lot of those who have no ideologies a picnic on the

sidelines of history, not a single project turned to the past nothing will work , neither the ussr nor the russian empire can be restored it is amazing but our power, apparently due to the initial social kinship. he is trying to establish continuity precisely with the russian empire , accents of the ifp, a complex of monarchism, and februaryism white guardism and opposing it to the soviet period. but tsarist russia was a dead end. the ussr solved such tasks that the autocracy could not even think of, we were born to make a fairy tale was her advice. and the principle, unlike the russian empire, for the last 50 years of its existence, the soviet union did not depend on anyone, it was not just a state from the center of an alternative

world system to capitalism, it is free for someone to choose the image of the future, consisting of lieutenants golitsyns, but this is a defeatist strategy, however, the ussr for all his victories. this is also the past, a new model of historical russia is needed, the time of the empire has passed, but the time of the national state has also passed. they can not resist the global totalitarianism of transnational companies and closed supranational groups of world coordination and management. we need new forms of something like empire-like formations with a population of at least 300 million people economic self-sufficiency in the current technological order, with all the conventionality of this term, the core of the military-industrial complex army fleet

secret services and a really reformed science empire-like education should combine hierarchical institutional and network principles, organizations and grow in territorial enclaves scattered around the world. this is the new world order, alternative to both anglo-saxon capitalism and the psycho-informational totalitarianism of the globalists, which is replacing it. it is a mistake to oppose the eurasian model to the globalists, as the regional world games are won on the world stage. the question is, the global battle for eurasia is coming. she is is already in full swing, if with regard to the syrian crisis one could say with words from

gaidar's boys and boys, as if the wind smells, either smoke from fires, or funerals from explosions, then the ukrainian crisis. it will also come from there, trouble, from where they did not expect, but there are a lot of us because of the black mountains, damned bourgeois, bullets are already whistling again, shells are already exploding again. and the nations are bad guys. set up with vodka surrender their country and there is no need for illusions. having occupied ukraine and using it as a bridgehead, they attacked us, they attacked russia. bandera ukraine-a us colony is a battering ram. from the west against russia, konstantin leontiev once said that the czech republic is a weapon that the slavs recaptured from the germans and directed against the amazing world. today, at the right time, he says that ukry is

a weapon that the west recaptured from the russian world and directed against it, so that the slavs would kill the slavs with porridge brewed on our western border. she is littered with her family on her head and our geopolitical adversary will try to tie up the ukrainian front. from the middle east, creating an intermediate caucasian, from which the line can to reach out to central asia, the last great hunt of the era of capitalism is coming and our task is to change places with the hunters, turning it into a cruelly cruel game. yes, don’t wake up, dashing, while it’s quiet. the taiga is a harsh bear in it and

the prosecutor and the executor of the sentence, this is the point of view of andrei fursov. i personally respect this person very much, i read his works quite a lot, and it seems to me that he is one of those who do not try to please the majority like the authorities. and here is the real one, and the patriot in the wonderful sense of this words that understands that only the truth. can be the basis of victory because if you do not know the truth do not tell the truth does not feel the truth do not formulate the truth. and this can lead to the fact that you will forget that you have already lied and get confused in the end. it seems to me that with all the controversy, this point of view is certain. she has

one thing in her. true, true andrey i really hope that we have many such people who have the truth, which they express for the benefit of our present and future at the next meeting. thank you

it's always interesting how it all starts. now everyone will see the manufacturers of good things want and

head, but it's best to check. allied forces withdrawn from the red estuary for more benefits