and free trade on the terms of the united states and when everything british surrendered and, in fact, by the beginning of the second world war. they already called for the united states to come, as if to europe, because they could not win their own wars. they could only lose, despite the fact that they were able to both the australians and the new delans, so to speak, well, much less, though the number, than in the first world war, to pull up, as the imperial troops, as it were , put up some indian shooters there, yes, actually was, but in fact had to go to an unprecedented effort to raise money for fighter planes in the forty-second year in the fortieth taxi. i have to apologize for the year. moreover, by the way, churchill, as it were, distinguished himself and as soon as in fact. finished world war ii, when no one wanted to touch anything. this whole system began to collapse. yes, as the president said. we took part in it americans took part all of them took part but what did the british do if we look at the map of how india was divided british they see

provoked a terrible number of conflicts that still last, they did it on purpose, that is, that is, the card was replayed so that when the british empire retreated, generally speaking, no one thought to make any claims to them so that they would fight among themselves, because that this is the forty-seventh year of the decree of parliament, his majesty yes, and already in the same year border conflicts begin. here is what they do. if only they had enough money to do so. to arm both sides of this conflict, they would have done so, but they were a weaker retreating empire, and therefore could not do it. here we are, as it were, now dealing with a retreating empire, in which part of the elite, firstly, does not want to come to terms with what is happening. and secondly, unfortunately, here we have said many times here that money is vera, the question of vera’s trust is that it really is money that gives you a piece of paper and some numbers on your smartphone

, do you believe that this is money? well, that's what armies are called. that's as long as that money see dollars and euros exist as long as someone believes in them. they have the ability to pump our neighbor's neighbor with deadly iron. borders, which we, by the way, also cut absolutely arbitrarily in the corresponding period of history. this is absolutely absolutely, but, but this war is already underway. and if we are talking about mobilization, it really should be everywhere, but this does not mean that everyone needs to be lined up. and even more so, it should not be done by the people who began to lead. here is this partial mobilization. this obviously suggests that it may not even be necessary to even remember this same headquarters, which also did not show itself very well during the great patriotic war for 2 years. you know that other people should be appointed to the institution if this one does not work. replace. we have

not only examples of failures, we have examples of success, there are examples in this field, because that is a frontier battle. after all, it was what, first of all, the economy was technologically. well, did you win it? why because there were delivered on time people? with the right structure and in our heads, so to speak, and whom they led, that we won this battle, in order to develop further success, we need to appoint such people and build such structures. moreover, these structures must be new for the twenty-first century. and we have such people. but no, well, listen, after all these very two gas pipelines were blown up this winter, you can buy the germans at a reasonable price, something i have been talking about for a long time, not only that you need to return your own, of course, to us here. and i want to see when our powerful the space satellite constellation is also big, so to speak, of course. i can't understand how non-space power ukraine

has this all the time. and we are from where they have these changes. there they do not even hide from the americans. they don't even hide. why americans are often in direct conflict, then it gives us the right to shoot down american satellites and destroy their intelligence system, because these are facts. they are learning the third law. not not they. how is that? yes, i'm in the house. i'm in space. so what, there no international treaty prohibits, but placing conventional weapons in space and shooting down satellites, as if there is no such thing, is not a simple waste. if you donate, if the americans set up here, hummers, we have the right to destroy yes, and if they set up systems, intelligence, according to which these cameras are everything, why can't we destroy these systems to the satellite. must be idiotic. this is what needs to be destroyed. here it is the third reason scouts sorry drones. flew carpenters take off,

if you transmit information to combat units that is used to strike everything, you are a legitimate chain. i will briefly conclude simply this is. in my opinion. in this case, the third reason. why is the same senator marco rubio not a window, so we are prompted to hit more, because everyone understands perfectly well that it would be most reasonable to hit these satellites. the face is the first, and the second, of course, well, as much as you can say, so to speak, throughout the so-called infrastructure of ukraine well, in the shower, as they say on february 24th. well i'm the only one i ask you to listen to oh i summarize the discussion on the use of nuclear weapons. i must say that the experience of the successful use of nuclear weapons against civilian targets. there are only in the united states of america, because the expedient from the nuclear bombing, hiroshima nagasaki, when the militaristic imperial japan

was actually ready for surrender, raises very serious doubts, which, by the way, led to the mass death of the civilian population the second moment. it has already been designated by you russian doctrinal documents do not imply attacks with nuclear weapons. this is an extreme measure, when it is written there that there is a threat to the very existence of the state. well, just the same, american military doctrinal documents suggest that such strikes be carried out preemptively ; moreover, uh, everyone is fine. it is known that the united states of america periodically work out such decisions with an enviable frightening frequency, at least at the level of a team of staff exercises and russian cities and capitals of the allies of the russian federation are bombed in including the city of minsk, the last such scandal some time ago was made public in the american press. during the reign of the dove of peace, obama in particular, such exercises

were carried out, so this is all a very dangerous discussion. so i understand that when our western opponents deploy, and this or that native. this means something bad is about to happen. we just have to take this into account in terms of security training. there is one more point. in that in my opinion, uh, the army, which is now being strengthened, hope that it strengthened with new forces. the mobilized will go there now. volunteers must be a robust body. no matter how much you and i would like this or not want the unacceptable existence of this internal fronts in tula, i certainly do not connect. the solution of all russian problems with the beginning of some kind of repression, but we must understand that the criminal administrative disciplinary repression. it is the most important management tool. it is an essential tool for maintaining law and order and social justice. for example, if a person quit bottle lights on the mixture in the recruiting office. this is not

hooliganism, absolutely a terrorist attack. i am a completely different article. i will tell you that, having learned from the bitter experience of 2020, belarus is acting in exactly this way, and at a certain stage. we were criticized by our russian colleagues. ay-ay-ay, they put a girl who administered anonymously on a telegram channel, where proscription lists of security officials were compiled. they called for violence against them over members. families. you can’t do this, you can and should do it in situations where there are moreover, a threat to the security of the state, continuing your thought about universities. well, frankly, hmm, it looks wild at the journalism department of moscow state university , a state university that trains journalists, the guy was hunted down for supporting the police in the st. petersburg branch of the higher school of economics, you know, i studied it carefully. it was too late to wait there. i have studied this precedent carefully. eh, there's a question not about deductions should be raised. this is

a criminal qualification. they insulted him. they threatened to kill him. they made it public personal data. as a result, two people were expelled, yes, they will be restored after some time. well, you can't do that. so we did not win the war, the army, again. you correctly said. she is a worker-peasant. basically, although there is, here are kadyrov aksyonov and other people who are put forward by this harsh time. they demonstrate an example of behavior, and the rest, where russia is a very well reminded country, the son of aksyonov left. how many deputies left the russian country with e? with a high gap high social differentiation in this studio, thoughts were already voiced, and even among the prigogine people, he voiced that if this 1% of the super-rich earned, well, remember the humor, but nevertheless, remember bender sent korea millionaire like a book. yes, all modern states. acquired dishonestly, henry ford was ready to account for every song, but not from the first million, except the first. yes. uh, in this case we

understand how many of these states are pressed. well , let's still ask this elite to help in the country and the army, where they have earned. it will be right. and by the way, the same ukraine and from the point of view. e suppression, so to speak. hmm, it’s not that they are different and they don’t call for copying ukrainian bandit methods, but from the point of view of the military society, enough has been mobilized and deviation from the declared position is unacceptable there. and as for god, not that they taxed their own. sorry friedman there, in my opinion, he was going to invest a billion, but you will not save him, i immediately say that they will take it from him. that's, uh, that's why i believe there are colossal internal reserves in russia. it is just necessary that the policy of the state be decisive and consistent so that wars are won when we see step forward 2 back. well, this is unlikely to lead us to success aleksandrovich

today in your telegram channel there is very interesting material and such additional information to the nuteract, which led to the withdrawal of three lines of nord stream one and two. well, really every day. we get some additional facts there or facts that indicate that it really was a sabotage, uh, in which no one took part country in all likelihood. and several countries. well , in addition to what i have already told you at two, in my opinion, evenings, we carefully analyzed what happened on september 4 of this year on september 4 of this year, and the ses private plane at 551, which was flown by petr grizman, the head of the group company. yes, you can, by the way, show that he was flying from spain to cologne and approximately approaching curly, having already left his high echelon. going actually to the decline. it was already an altitude of approximately 3.5 and

4.000 m. e, they say that he lost something with the cabin all communication with the cockpit lost all communication further. he continued his flight. uh, after which he crashed near the ventspls, starting from ger and in general, starting from france well, he was already specifically escorted from germany, military fighter planes, which, as they say, had no connection with the cockpit and did not even see in the cockpit we couldn’t see anyone in any way , although they say they were approaching him quite close, when we checked and took this left chart overlaid on the right chart on the right on the chart we have the threads of nord stream-2, it turned out that the flight route or route of the flight of peter grizziman. it practically corresponds to this line of nord stream one and nord stream two, moreover, it practically passes by bonhorn islands. horne, right where those three explosions were. in this regard, hmm

, a question arises. and what is a griezmann spetier, and everything is very simple there, his company is directly related to the maintenance of nord stream one and nord stream two, and in what plan and how they confuse it is very hard to get this information. the first information about what they have to do with it. uh, appeared in the dutch public. she's been with us for a long time. today i checked again. it really exists, as my sources in germany give me information, indeed this company took the most serious part in the technical work to provide nord stream one and north stream two in connection with this, of course, the question is asked. and what did uh, peter griezmann, he didn’t fly alone, he flew with his family. e, who also died. what peter grizman did in this plane and corresponds to the summer theory that was presented to us in germany by the real the fact is that hmm, having lost pressure

, depressurization - depressurization of the aircraft at an altitude of 3 1/2 4.000 m does not lead to loss of consciousness, therefore, the main version that there was a cabin depressurization, and he was a loss. l consciousness as well as all members of his family and there was no connection with the family with the earth. it does not stand up to any criticism of this could not simply be by definition. there could be bad. there could be some probabilities there, but a one-time loss of consciousness at such a height. it is simply impossible for any expert to say this. e on aerodynamics on medical all these cases in connection with this, of course. hmm, it is important to understand. whether it was a depressurization or peter grisemann had other reasons to make this flight , there is an assumption, at least this is our version, that peter grizman either found out about the impending sabotage, or quite likely had a certain thing about it from the very beginning.

performance. once again, i just have to go back to this version itself and recall what i have been saying that according to data scientists to data analysts. this sabotage, these explosions, could not have been carried out, but they could have been prepared within one or even two days ; that 's how powerful she is with this concrete mantle with this mound and with uh, the seabed of soil. uh what for in order to do this thing, more technical work is needed, which, well, at least would last days, but most likely. a few weeks, therefore, there is an assumption that participated in these technical works, the respective countries that had such technical capabilities petr grizman, as the head of the company that services the eye in this, could not know about it. he had to know about it,

that is, he became an uncomfortable witness at all. indeed, i think here we are they just looked at his psychotype, this psychotype is not well , let's just say, not an action movie. this is a completely different person. this is a man who took part in carnivals. there, most likely. he was, as a leader, not dedicated to this operation and at some point when he found out about it. i assume he made this flight. or he made this flight, of course, it is happening, but to see what is happening there, it’s clear what flies there, he would not necessarily fall into the zone, the zone of action in the zone of observation of the special services, the zone of observation of the military who were there. this i remind the baltic that a few days before the explosions. us naval ships passed there, i remind you of that plane that was refueling over the northwest western end of poland over the

baltic sea, connected transponders that you were approaching bornhorm with its transport, this is true. all this was all these three events, as if they were not connected with each other. but when, uh, i consider the version of death, uh, of griezmann and his family, which, as it were, has nothing to do with it, but absolutely definitely falls on this ruta there, of course, there may be deviations from 50-100 km for a small psna aircraft that can fly at a cruising speed of up to 900 km/h. this presents no problem at all. the main thing is that he went exactly this way, that, we do not know what equipment was on this stage. we don’t know this either. and which one, since a high-level person, uh, who is really directly related to very serious, including military technologies, will never know. it can be assumed that session was also not so simple and that sesna, and look more carefully. as shown, for example, by the swedes. they tell us theirs on their websites. they showed how this plane fell, that

is, there was a plane crash, as the experts told me, so the plane does not fall into the water there were some kind of incomprehensible loops there, it seems that the plane was evading pursuit, so this is also another question nobody. the corpses were not found on the wreckage of this plane, no one knows anything, that is, how it would have disappeared, there is this version. let's let's count, so the version is dreaming. she is naval vessels in the united states of america with the possibility of technical capabilities with less submarines, a tanker that flew there at night at the same time, if we compare all this and all this is analytics, then we must conclude that, because what happened at sp e, at least three or four countries took part. and i will deliberately do so without naming these countries, but we understand that these are the countries that are in the zone of precisely this no one believes that russia blew up unequivocally

no one believes, germany relates to this, i will even say, so even these recent skirmishes between the minister of health and the minister of defense. they are not related to statements, lauterbach. they are connected , uh, specifically with the fact that germany is now trying to somehow move away from all this. and of course, from this version, they definitely start from the version of russia's participation, but now we will have a guest who wrote a brilliant post about who is behind these explosions now advertising, because we will talk with him with the director of the information department of sadness of the russian ministry of foreign affairs vladimir and zakharova moril. there they received a lot of requests that we go out more often, well, we will try. in the west, they are trying to declare us a pariah country. let's look at this story a

little differently. this is an attempt to hear recreate. through painting, the entire panorama of the great country is artistic fantasy.

let's translate from clerical, but understandable, everything is not so scary if there is an instruction. european countries one after another call russian ambassadors to present protest honey in connection with the referendum and now new regions of russia in poland, exactly to the point that they tried to lure our representative to their side

and promised support if he condemned the position of the russian authorities. how to relate to such impudence, we will discuss with the director of the press information department of the russian foreign ministry moril vladimir vladimirovich, your excellency. nice to see you in the studio. mutually that's why you vladimir rudolfovich play along with the nato countries. this is what you will call, but european the european side is us yes, we are eurasia but one part of us. and by the way, those foundations that are the basis of our culture. i don't know even the parts. european, what are you talking about, it has nothing to do with it. well , maybe only geographically to europe, but not mental, ideological and political. what are they european? what kind of european civilization is this, which came out of antiquity from

ancient greece, ancient rome, some kind of christian civilization. these barbarians understand the most natural barbarians who demolish monuments pollute their own history. they make the history of their other children real mankurts, that is, people without memory, and now also without sex. these are people who supply weapons, as if to their friend , the ward, whom they themselves tamed only in order to flood the region of that very europe with blood. what's this? european civilization no, it betrays everything very strongly. this civilization is not european. this is a little like american civilization, which mastered the territory of north america, burning out the indigenous

population, destroying a culture, by the way, a thousand-year-old many thousand-year-old, planting by the power of their rights that they did not have, inventing new orders and rules, passing them off as civilization , this is what is now characteristic of those countries and their behavior , which you call european, which, in fact, have lost their entire europeanness. this is where it is written in some such diplomatic anals that the host country calls the ambassador of a sovereign state. and offered interaction at a time when this very host country is actually a party to the conflict, supplying weapons to that state, and this is not even a state, but a regime that is openly engaged in practically

terrorist activities against our country. this is what you said was it happened to our rescuer in poland, i remind you. this is the same mr. andreev who lays flowers at the monuments of our defenders of the liberator of this very europe, was doused with some kind of liquid paint and red, which was attacked. this is not some kind of performance. this is a real attack, and to whom now cowardly and meanly looking, as if over each other's shoulder, they offered some kind of interaction. to whom did they offer a person who is really going to such a peak in the midst of this frenzy to lay flowers at the monument to the wars of his liberators, or what? or do they not understand yet? who are russian diplomats? what is the russian diplomatic

service? they probably mixed up, they apparently give out the basics of the specialty and profession, which really laid down the ability to negotiate. the lack of patriotism and national pride should not be confused, but they are confused, because they have long forgotten how to do any diplomacy. everything is mixed up with them, but i think that, of course, we will talk about something else. you see, it's a fan call. uh, summoning our ambassadors, uh, chargé d'affaires and so on, the flash mob is real. i thought maybe they would share a secret. who among them nord stream, so to speak, failed, and i don’t know, blew it up, well, who committed sabotage, but no, you see about international law decided to talk. here you know what i want to say. now, probably, very many who read this news think, but they can’t all be wrong like that in france,

germany, spain, where else in the baltic states they called in poland well, in many nato countries well, they can’t all be wrong like that. yes , they can't make mistakes, they don't make mistakes. they just lie. this is a cynical one hundred percent lie their concern for international law, let's talk about it. now. i think it's about time. what argument do they not recognize the referenda that took place, but in the very regions that have now become part of our country. they say that the wrong referendums were held wrong. and you can ask after all how many years they asked. and how it should be, and how, from their point of view , the people's will should take place, after all, they endlessly talked about being great specialists in democracy, how many times we asked them a direct question during bilateral negotiations, or even

publicly addressed. and how many times have we put this question on international platforms? please, show me, or if you work out a draft of the norm, which we will all then adopt by agreeing on how this should happen, no, fine. that's not how referendums are held. nobody knows how. though. we have seen every attempt. within these countries of people is a community of ethnic groups or people who have fought for many years for at least some respect for their own. what did they run into? they came across only one thing no, not that they were not allowed to hold a referendum, and not even that let's say there was some kind of political game, that's all . you know, an anachronism having long ago created directly criminal prosecution and real persecution. all those who asked the question of whether it is possible to somehow talk about our rights in this or that region?

no, you can't, it's impossible. it's not like that. okay. at the same time, the referendum on england's exit from the uk was normal, and the scottish referendum suited them with the result. therefore, legitimacy was recognized, and catalan was recognized not only as illegal persecuted. why on his colleagues? criminal return as a punishment. ok then. well, this is the most difficult question, how to conduct a referendum? well , let's say that such a term is cognito, that is, the norm has not yet been developed. and for some reason no one wants to answer the question. and as it should, although on the other hand, then do not say that these referendums were not held in such a way, since there are no norms. okay, let's ask the question in a different way then, and how it was. here's how it was with similar complex issues in which you nato countries felt the victory

of international law and fully agreed with this situation, but there were some precedents. but you know you need saxon law - this is the law of precedent absolutely. that is, people constantly refer to some norm already fixed in practice. well, let's once again, and so to speak , urgent about the fact that for the west it is topic number one, and in the space, by the way, speaking of the same europe, kosovo, after all, is a story overgrown with fiction. they have been dealing with the topic of kosovo for many months now. and by the way, saying all the balkans in manual mode again washington brussels, which does not lead coast guards with belgrade in such a way that it is necessary to take everything into their own hands in a tougher way, but we remember the famous phrase, uh, victoria nuland, which i think you can just write in golden letters above the state department what she wants to do with the european union , because she doesn’t quite like him or likes him, but not in the way

she would like, but let’s remember, how there was a terrible tragedy in the nineties, a beam, and next to it is a bathhouse. from kosovo kosovo has a huge number of people who are affiliated with in the bath. this is to the question of not interfering in elections. yes, what kind of elections does albania simply occupy with its own hands? moderation modeling and all kinds, but i don’t know insinuations and staging, which could only have been and which led to terrible tragedies that we see a series of self-confessions of kosovo in the early nineties. well, just directly in the ninetieth year about supposedly independence, what they just didn’t do there, they came up with some kind of statements. after they called themselves independent. they said they would there is no referendum, comrades. wait on the contrary, first the will is expressed, and then announced. well, god bless him in the nineties, a terrible story that

ended in wars. remember for many years that then the nato bombings and then 2008. naturally, it ends with the fact that this same entity, with the help of its western curators , declares itself supposedly independent in 2008 immediately after that. serbia is going to the general assembly, where we will talk to you again today with a request to give a legal assessment of the legality of this step and general assembly adopts resolution 63/3 in this resolution. she appeals to the international court of justice in the hague. here is the most beloved the hague, on which everyone now refers about and the devil once again, please take it out. the decision is an advisory opinion, as to whether the unilateral e, this declaration

of independence is in line with the right to remind you, they also have on the table, e, there was a resolution of the security council that was mandatory for implementation, where it was said. and so to speak, respect for territorial integrity federal republic and yugoslavia, what do you think in a year and a half? why did i take a paper to give you a quote exactly in a year and a half, the tenth year on july 22? the international court of justice issued an advisory opinion. by a majority of 10 votes in favor to four, it was decided that the declaration of independence, kosovo is a quote from february 17, 2008, did not violate general international law. and then there is an explanation, since international law does not contain a ban on declaring independence. wow, that is how, but the most

interesting further we talked about this a lot, but you know everything, no matter how uninteresting the most interesting further washington officially recommended the court to agree with the accepted one. as a result, the conclusion, since the principle of territorial integrity. a direct quotation does not exclude the emergence of new states on the territory of existing states. and i'll tell you straight. that's how, because , well, by law, and now let's go back a couple of years from now, that we are all these so to speak, e omniscient exclusively and they said that international law is there for you, and they will all live and impose world orders, touched on the rules. that is , when they hit a dead end. right application

when they have already played so much in manipulating the norms and inconsistency of their actions with the laws. they realized that it was necessary to reboot all this and came up with a new one that would now be wrong, and the rules were good for several years. we live in a state of upholding international legal norms. we refer to it and tells us, no no, now the rules. i say, but somewhere you can read someone voted for them. what international organization produces them. he says no no, forget to go ahead. rules, that is, rules , are what is adopted by the fact of practice. that's from life from the earth, what do you think, as soon as life prompted a decision, they immediately returned to international law. i want to remind you of another story in 1955, the tsarist region takes away their

france and goes to germany, but you know how many such examples there are from the inside, and i tell you now about lies, i will tell them. after all, they are after the fourteenth year after the referendum. and krymsky what did they tell us? why couldn't they recognize him ? why? well, you, by the way, it was publicly. well, when i saw it for the first time, i heard it behind closed doors during the negotiations. i went cold, they said you don't compare the crimean referendum with the absence of a referendum in kosovo. although no one can really compare, because there was nothing in your situation. don't compare. now attention argument the nato argument of the nato countries of the european union and the united states of america because kosovo fought for many years to gain independence,

and crimea did not fight. wait well, but if this was your argument for many years on the non- recognition of the results of the referendum in the crimea and now something you haven’t seen, when donbass has been bleeding all these years, crimea is taken for 15 years. sorry, of course, they had a different argument to fight. well, why are you vladimir longer, it's a struggle. also different, sometimes there is a correct figurative. here with point of view of nato washington brussels crimea fought wrongly with the wrong methods and the wrong people. another thing is 3 years, fought another thing that kosovo fought with weapons in hand. they did say. well , of course, he put it aside with a weapon in his hands, and this was also an argument, by the way, it sounded in the public plane. it boiled down to the fact that the recognition of kosovo

by the nato countries was necessary in order to stop the bloodshed and give people a chance for a peaceful life. sergey viktorovich because all their lives they have been engaged in falsehood and staging, because it is their credo because it is their handwriting. you know how bandits thieves criminals are recognized by fingerprints. that's exactly the same for such prints. we recognize nato based on this, who blew up. nord stream is one of the nord stream 2 pro-resolutions i will say not at the security councils sambles. now we are all being warned and frightened from being actively discussed by everyone that now there will be a resolution of the un general assembly condemning russia or there with non-recognition of

referendums and so on. and what will it become part of international law. you know, probably, there will be all this, probably, well, we see, read the materials and hear, what they say here is only a small nuance that i would like everyone to remember when they gather in the hall, where on the snot. and even before that, there was a security council resolution that was mandatory for execution, part of which was the minsk agreements. and now, over the past few months, facts have been revealed that were voiced directly by the authors, that is, participants in those events. the development of the minsk agreements they declared openly that they did not intend to comply with this resolution. this is also a factor of international law that must be taken into account. this is a forgery , a real forgery, on a state-wide global

scale, therefore, to all those who doubt that there may somehow still be some kind of international legal, well, some kind of gap in the inconsistency inconsistency. yes, of course there is. here in this endless forgery and manipulation of international law, of course. there is a concept of the law of applied practice. that is, the norm the situations are similar or even identical, but the art of a lawyer is new - new circumstances, by the way, speaking eloquence, but for the conviction of the same jurors all this can play a role. well , probably once they are when it becomes a system, and civilians become hostages about nord stream, 2. what else is needed? remember how we were told about navalny's violins you are in britain in london you did it because you could do it and you

did it normally before no, no other rational explanation, who else could do it with a high degree of probability. what sounded? as highley-lightly so, i return their portrait as well. you did it because you have the opportunity to do it, because historically you did it all the time, not just what you did, but you did it all the time and as you said. but at the same time, you also quoted the americans, who, by and large , directly admitted this, wrote a wonderful post, where they simply didn’t leave a stone unturned from the blinkin’s mission, because it’s like rejoiced mr. blinkin. this, of course, was simply amazing, that is, the criminal could not hide the joy of his crime. and this is also

the described case of a criminal. you remember always pulling on the crime scene, and also very often the criminals of the murderer come to see the funeral of those they killed. this, unfortunately, is a fact described both in psychiatry and in forensic and forensic psychiatry in judicial practice in law enforcement practice. but this is about them. it ’s not so much about them that everyone was convinced for years that it was their national security is affected, which is a factor threatening the national. security and spoke, by the way, speaking in unison. it's not just washington they say it was said in washington it was said, london said it, warsaw and it was said by all three baltic capitals, it's a collective history is a collective responsibility. they convinced everyone for some reason that this is a thing that is not needed, because it

should not be. who said it? under obama, his administration said it was the democrats, it would turn out. yes, you understand very well, they have different systems, some came to say one thing, and then these come to cancel everything in it. we also passed, but look here. what constancy is somewhat more than one administration of the democrats, and then yes of the republicans, and then one administration of the republicans tru- another democrats, then comes another team. e republicans and then come another team of democrats. that is, the whole palette, moreover, even the previous team of republicans. she, by the way, was, so to speak, led. well, anyway, not a system person not from pre-republican party that is, he was so-so . in general, one can say that they came from the outside, that is, the whole set of their political stalk.

he spoke only one thing nord stream nord stream one and two. must be rather than threaten the national security of the united states and now you look correctly said can not hide the joy who first. poland congratulates, the united states of america thanks them and says, when they just pushed sikorsky to the wall and said, that is, this recognition is a terrorist attack , and i will explain. why are you so on that sikorsky says by deleting, the previous tweet says that this is his personal opinion, and he named those who could do this because he had a reason had a motive. now why are you happy and why are these situations connected at all? i don't know if you had programs or not. it seems to me that this should be a separate program, and gas, the energy security of europe and ukraine as the entry point to this issue of the united

states of america, it’s easy to decompose in stages, how this story developed with us, that at least a year sovereign ukraine was normal from the point of view concluding gas deals. you will invite representatives of gazprom here. they will tell you - we followed the whole country until december 31st. well, you understand, we had a good tradition, these are films by eldar ryazanov yes, and films, but about the conclusion of a gas deal between russia and ukraine , this was the entry point for the united states. years. they tried to do it in different ways, both through corrupt ukrainian politicians and officials, and from no less corrupt european ones, but officials didn’t work out. europe held on and then they just went the bloody way of sabotage, but maybe

the last moment is very important. why else is it connected, because again the same prints. remember what explosions did with crimea, the threat of explosions of power plants, mining of power plants , blocking water to crimea, remember the overlap. all this is qualified by international law as an act of terrorism, and now the same trace is interesting that there are no questions. who are we dealing with the westerners quite funny released the cover of the magazine, but such a mocker should be noted with a nadbaiden, answering a question. who did this? they showed the following, of course, it was biden. he just forgot. this is a replica of the famous sculpture la la well, this is for you, of course. and you forgive me, you know. not everyone here remembers his sons. oh well, now at the same time and reminded. thank you

very much, maria vladimirovna, we will return to this studio in a few minutes and continue our conversation with the new line-up. dear friends, while our main issue is being prepared free tv programs on global topics, about which we are used to talking, i suggest you talk outside the brackets on somewhat abstract topics, but which we are generally a wave of. i hope you might be interested too. i 'm looking forward to you. see you.

we watch to explore the world of educational programs and documentaries we watch for free without registration.

including the strategic is now very pleasing to foreigners. it seems that ukraine can achieve its military goals.