the emission may be a sign of prostatitis. try vitaprost tablets. vitaprost restores the functioning of the prostate, and not just eliminates the symptoms. and you enjoy the life of vitaprost, because there has never been a loan in alpha bank from four and a half percent. get money today alpha-bank is the best mobile bank. experts and analysts are discussing the results of the nobel peace prize and the winners, let me remind you, were an organization recognized as foreign and liquidated in russia a memorial, an activity funded by the eu and the us alisa bialiatsky, chairman of the not registered in belarus human rights center spring, which was created in lithuania well and the ukrainian centers for civil liberties. however, in

kiev, offended by the entourage of the ukrainian president , they hoped that it was he who would receive the peace prize. some western agencies also predicted a laureate for him and called him one of the favorites. true, what such beliefs were based on is completely incomprehensible, because neither the words nor the action of zelensky to the world has nothing to do with it. so the day before, a frankly aggressive statement was made not for the nobel peace prize anastasia yefimova will continue judging by the frankly caustic tone of advisers, kiev is again disappointed in the nobel peace prize for vladimir zelensky, they hoped they believed, but were left with nothing. see what the hell the nobel committee, following the example of the un, also broke the history of the 20th century. it will end completely soon, but ukraine does not seem to like the results of the 20th century at all , and therefore they are ready to do everything to 21

ended. much ahead of schedule, after all, on the eve of the solemn ceremony in oslo from kiev , the failed peace prize winner vladimir zelensky called for no more, no less for preventive nuclear strikes on russia, so that he knows what nato should do to exclude the possibility of russia using nuclear weapons. but what is important, i once again appeal to the international community, as it was before february 24, preventive strikes, so that they know what will happen to them if applied, they, on the contrary, will wait. but blows from russia and then speak. oh, you are so, well, get from us from this, apparently. even there, any arguments about a nuclear war were somewhat taken aback, an unacceptable unthinkable thesis that seems understandable everywhere except kiev there, although a press secretary urgently came to the aid of his president and in an ironic manner dissonant with reality. i began to explain to my colleagues. you've

gone a little too far with your nuclear hysteria. and now you see nuclear strikes even where there are none. the president spoke about the period until 24 february. then it was necessary to take preventive measures in order not to allow russia to unleash a war, let me remind you that the only measure that was then discussed was preventive sanctions to blackmail the world with explosions at nuclear power plants and strongly hint at the use of nuclear weapons only the terrorist country russia from ukraine allows such calls. you will never hear. well, what if such a statement? the world has already heard the countries of ukraine, in particular, we heard the munich security conference last february, when volodymyr zelensky directly promised to start developing nuclear weapons, because the world allegedly does not want to help him. and now, in parallel with the arguments about preventive nuclear strikes. he asks for support. this time around, the atms long-range missile systems that the allied forces would like to use to strike russian

territory, including crimea, ukrainian officials are renewing their requests for more weapons, including advanced systems. such as the us army tactical missile system or these acms representatives said congress and us president biden. until now, he refused to provide ukraine with these cms that would be capable of reaching russian territory . the reasons why the united states is at least not yet ready to satisfy kiev's bloodthirsty desires for this wall street magazine is not at all pacifist, as the source of the publication in congress claims washington is trying to sit on two chairs and support ukraine and not to go into direct conflict with russia, which, however, looks rather hypocritical of doubts on whose side today the collective west has been playing for a long time no one can pass over in silence the reckless action of the kiev regime, which is aimed at creating the

risks of using various types of weapons and mass destruction during a special military operation. very disturbing facts have come to light, including the presence of illegal military biological programs in laboratories created by the pentagon, including experiments to create banned chemicals , but the most dangerous e. incessant strikes on the zaporozhye nuclear power plant, and yesterday zelensky called on his western masters to inflict a preemptive nuclear strike on russia, thereby this figure, in fact, presented to the whole world another evidence of the threats that come from the kiev regime and to neutralize, which the special military operation was launched. he didn’t pull back, much more eloquent than the postponed

decision on the supply of long-range systems, joe biden’s statement about the risk of nuclear armageddon. already quoted. it seems that everything. only after all, the american president spoke exclusively about alleged threats emanating from russia clarify that the threat to the planet is the kiev servant of the american people. biden. apparently , anastasia efimova simply forgot to lead, by the way, this year the anniversary of the caribbean crisis, the essence of which was that the measures turned out to be on the verge of a nuclear catastrophe, then the united states of the ussr eventually found a mutually beneficial way out of the situation, that experience can be applied to today's events. we will discuss with mikhail gusman, first deputy general director of the news agency tass and the author of a documentary film about anatoly dobrynin, an outstanding diplomat of the ussr ambassador to the united states, and a. his role is that the world was kept

on the brink of war as a result of the caribbean crisis, and mikhail solomonovich good evening. you are far from russia, we know it was hard to get to the internet. we thank you for taking the time and opportunity to answer our questions. and here is what i would like to ask you at the beginning. and why did you come up with the idea to create this film at one time? did you foresee the current situation? well, to be honest, this is a 2019 movie , then november 16th turned 90 years old. i would say to the great russian soviet diplomat anatolyevich dobrynin, who, uh, for almost 24 years, was the ambassador of the soviet union to the salty states under six american presidents and five general sections of the cpsu. to

work on a film about him. and i had the honor of doing a big big trick with him, when i was already, uh, in retired. in general, in the past, he had a long life almost , until the age of ninety-one, and even was in a completely instant form until the last day. and i talked a lot with him, we talked to him under the camera and i really wanted to make a film about him, but when i delved into the topic of his activities. yes, i realized that e caribbean crisis, which came literally. e, fell on the very first month of his work in the united states - this is 1062. it is literally a few months before october. uh, arrived uh your job. that's it, uh, the crisis and it's absolutely. well unique role in overcoming this crisis. e, made me reconsider, so to speak, our scripted plans and make a film about him

precisely through the prism of solving this crisis, a film about how, uh, despite the incredibly difficult situation at a time when it seemed that the world was inevitably rolling into a world war. uh, to the nuclear apocalypse. when a literally day after day a nuclear catastrophe was approaching. uh, as a result of these almost round-the-clock negotiations conducted by dobrynin a. with your interlocutor, a here it is important to say that president kennedy entrusted this subtle matter of this most complex negotiation. uh, there are no guests, i say, not the minister of defense. and the chief trusted us most of all to his own brother at that time, minister of justice robert kennedy. and it was precisely in the dialogue of these two, representatives of their countries, except for the states and anatoly dobrynin , the soviet ambassador, washington, literally. it

would seem that in a few hours, i don’t know, maybe a political solution was found before a possible war. there are dozens of books about this now. this is history. uh, became the property of millions of millions of people and very , many many immediately return to it in this and today they remembered it. well, today it’s completely here, because the crisis itself is determined by uh with two weeks, uh from october 12 to 26. october uh 1962, uh, when such a peculiar thing is possible, as the anniversary is coming that week, because uh always when the world is in a difficult situation, when complex processes are taking place, some analogies are going on in the head, you understand some episodes, but i must say that the main outcome of this crisis. uh sixty-

second year of the caribbean thirtieth is commonly called in that two great countries were able to find a solution. look out to apologize. let last minute. let literally. uh, what is called on the flag, but could find a way out. and this way out, uh, can serve as an example of the fact that it is always necessary to look for agreements. it is necessary to consider the search for mutually emerging solutions, it is necessary to find a compromise. no matter how difficult it would be to make its participants mikhail salamanj, and still, there are opponents of this analogy. they say that it is not the 1960s that the american establishment, which is not capable of contracting at all, but the level of the american intellectual elite has fallen sharply. well, not all, of course, but still. uh, those who at least now officially represent american politics, if you are talking to anyone in washington, dc what do you think, on the

one hand? i agree with that? and it is never possible to find at least exact taxes. but uh, what can you say? you know, when i was preparing the film talked, including not only with russian diplomats but with soviet diplomats, but with the past of the present. i talked there, and i also look at than anton in the current russian ambassador to the united states. but this is connected with the american e, diplomats and political of those years. i even managed to go out of life with a low defense. uh, that time by robert that yes, then the american hawks are trusted by the president of such people. decisive action, that is, in fact, it is pushing to press the nuclear button, but not

we will reveal that around the soviet leader there were also quite tough people who firmly stood on the fact that we should not retreat, because , well, it will be different, so to speak, but it was the same. i believe the wisdom of both leaders and nikita khrushchev and kennedy's retirement that they were able to, er, so to speak, despite any pressure from any side after all. it will take its own people, who negotiated in them, before dobrynin and kennedy, although there were negotiations on other tracks, still try to find a solution, it was found, because after all, actually dude, what is the problem with the fact that the united states of america was stationed in turkey that easily reached the territory. e-e of the soviet union up to moscow could reach 25. these were placed soviet missiles with nuclear charges. that

is, in cuba there is a long story. now i'm 10 can see. maybe this film is ours, which is practically in crisis, but uh, nonetheless. uh, as these solutions did not say, when literally. at the last moment, the conditions for the withdrawal of soviet missiles from cuba. she is worth it, zabrynin suggested a conclusion turkish missiles e american from turkey then uh robert realized that this was also a chance. and he said that dobrynin will suit you right away, although, in principle, he was answering at that moment. uh, i don't know, top management's decision. i took such courage. it was strongly political boldly all from the outside. she even agreed with the president. yes damn immediately unsubscribed. uh, the encryption to moscow received the consent of khrushchev's personal leaders and literally a few hours later actually

happened. here is an example of how the hardest you need an adult in search of a compromise in search of solutions. and michael’s night itself is clear that there is an experience that history gives us, but there is a current reality, which, of course, no matter how it is something, at least similar to the caribbean crisis, has a lot of its own nuances. do you think we have 2 minutes left? i understand that the question is not for 2 minutes, however, how do you see the current compromise? well, first of all. uh, since we are talking in the context of uh analogues, most likely a crisis. it seems to me, fundamentally categorically impossible any speculation any colloquial. eh, any, especially waving even theoretically the possibility of a nuclear conflict in the modern world is not and can

not be a place for a nuclear conflict for a nuclear attack. whatever country you are, even a conversational topic, even uh, absolutely such fantasy assumptions of it. in my opinion. even now it has been excluded that it cannot be in rhetoric, much less in any practice, the verdict of this process. yes, mikhailandwich. and those fantasy fantasy conversations. they go for a long time a lot in specialized american magazines. you know this very well, but scenarios for the use of tactical nuclear weapons are being considered. they talk before nuclear winter. it's not so scary. actually, the climate. eh, will survive from the earth. and we have a chance, that is, they say that in a nuclear war you can win. can a nuclear war be won? how do you think? well, good luck to the hunters for such speculations, they may have been and may still be, but here i still think, i want to repeat. what and by the way, yes i agree, uh, with

the fact that literally today e, said the general. e, the secretary, sir, says yarysh through the mouth of his representative, which necessarily categorically rejects even the self the possibility of speculating conversations on this topic. i'm sorry, i'll interrupt you. uh, because we have a very tight air time, really. it's hard to disagree with you. it is necessary to note all the conversations on this topic. let me remind you that we spoke with mikhail gusman, the first deputy general director of the tass news agency, we will continue the international topic britain is one of the the main parties in the ongoing conflict in ukraine, including in order to resolve their internal problems. true, this has not yet been done , on the contrary, anti-russian sanctions have brought britain to the brink of a political crisis. true, recently british politicians

seem to be trying to smooth things over. what is this about? the new cabinet of ministers of the kingdom frightened international investors for their own, too, with their determination to do well for the english people, a number of economic initiatives aimed at to reduce the financial time of the population, let me remind you that it was proposed to freeze electricity bills for the population. but the prices for the business of industrial and government institutions, most likely, will not be limited. well, in any case, this is not yet in the plans of the british government, while the new economic development plan includes a reduction in the base income tax rate. uh, and the increase in corporate tax, on the contrary, is planned to be canceled all this according to the minister of finance, like a quarter for some reason should reduce inflation and cause economic growth. all these recipes have long been known. they are part of the arsenal of liberal reforms, starting with the

example of british minister margaret thatcher in the early eighties of the last century. that is, the middle class and the poor will pay for everything , dissatisfaction was caused by tax cuts for the rich, for example, the income tax on nurse teachers will increase. stunningly unfair that this conservative government is raising taxes on our nurses and teachers, at the same time, providing large enterprises and banks with tax breaks. in addition to growing popular discontent, the new government achieved other successes, for example, a record fall in the pound to its lowest level since 1971, so the list of times until it can find the key to overcoming the economic difficulties of great britain by its actions as prime minister. already led to a record drop in ratings, thorim. yes, and in the most conservative party, voices are heard louder and louder, calling whether the

strass, well, come to your senses and be more realistic. today we talked with andrey kelin, ambassador of russia to great britain, the first thing that the ambassador drew attention to is the fact that the conservative party, whose representatives are strass, is clearly dissatisfied with her proposal? a congress of the conservative party was held here, and from sunday to wednesday, the situation was difficult , i must say, e, in general, it became obvious that the plan was not accepted. indeed, firstly, the conservatives who were there themselves believed little in him, and secondly, of course, he struck many. here it's a twist when listraz canceled one of the key positions. so, regarding the reduction of e, the rate of taxation for those who have super-high incomes over 150 pounds. and so, uh, trying to explain it somehow. eh, the explanation did not

work out, but the people did not believe. and what we have now, uh, is a very low level of trust, both in the country, and among conservatives, such a low level of trust aside from the new government. and for example, or passion 14% of everything. and even jones was not like that. and even among conservatives. eh, this is somewhere no more than 30%, now you said in favor. eh, plans, used once this is very revealing, because only recently, and she came a-a to the leadership of the party and the government. eh, still with a pretty decent chance. so such a rapid fall shows a reversal and, of course, a prospective crisis in relation to it. and mrs. taras clearly lacks a creative approach to solving acute economic problems on her part and clearly copied approaches to solving them from her well-known the predecessor of margaret thatcher, who, back in the early eighties, i will remind you again about this, but

took exactly the same set of measures, that is, once again, the maximum reduction in social payments, the transfer of tax time to the middle class and the release of big business from unnecessary social obligations. we are talking about a reduction in payments to the social insurance system, corporate investments and corporate investments of a large corporation are not planned to be increased by taxes, whether this is margaret thatcher's plan or something others? i can’t say now, but it’s absolutely certain that the experts didn’t believe in this plan, they did n’t believe it, and investors also say this now, and the investors are leaving britain and the amount of those who are called is colossal. i don't want to speculate. i've heard a few options here for the amount that's gone already from the uk but also an indicator of the fact that fitch has already downgraded the forecast as well. uh, then the stander lowered the forecast. but,

as far as i understand, now everyone is waiting for the same thing to be done to him, that is, the country ceases to be attractive because there is no explanation of what they are going to do completely incomprehensible. where will the funding for all these come from? what actually compensates? these measures again print money in the country without this double-digit inflation, and it is increasing, but apparently all this is due to borrowing. it all looked attractive. e for the possibility of wide circles. uh, there, like average and, as it were, not rich conservatives, when there was a discussion, which of them would be, and from the buses, the prime minister, then a more famous figure, of course, was she passionate against the background of all the other applicants, but now , when it came to practice, and when the first mini-budget was presented, and there are a lot of others in it and a lot is hidden, since even we will go. e, the minister of finance, did not dare to open,

and what the budget will consist of, and this will be announced only on november 23, and before that, respect is still quite large. well, apparently, the minister. yes , november 23 is trying to find funds in order to close these very holes. well, it must be said that there were other suggestions. how to change the crisis situation in the british economy? but her competitor had alternatives less often than bags, when he really, which person, who passed the ministry of finance and others, or rather, really understands finance well, is well versed in how city a works and that, in general, an alternative is needed aside the plan was like that, eh, but now it seems to be pushed back. eh, everyone will be watching. but what, what promotes the list of times, and she has 2 years, but on e, until the next election, although many say that in general, the figures are gradually becoming

toxic for the party and, uh, it cannot be ruled out that the choice will already be made, uh, by the conservatives with others, but by the leadership of the party, but everyone is offering to see what will come of it in the coming months, how they will survive the winter. uh, large articles appeared today that there will be rolling blackouts for 3 hours a day, somewhere like that, otherwise the power industry from the outside cannot cope. eh, so what you just need to be patient to take? so this was the news? i alexander koreyevsky say goodbye to you. uh, soon see you on our channel in a few minutes will continue my colleague, georgy podgorny such a low rate has not yet been a loan in the

alpha bank from 4.5 percent. get money today alpha-bank is the best mobile bank. faster frequent difficulty urinating can be a sign of prostatitis. try vitaprost tablets. vitaprost restores the functioning of the

prostate, and not just eliminates the symptoms. and you are enjoying the life of vitaprost, because bcs knows how to make money work in a difficult situation this summer. profitability of our autofollowing strategies accounted for up to nineteen percent. open the world of investments bcs bought my snow leopard something new ordered filter plugs and off the beaten track on avito listen to how a large selection of new parts purrs. a bank in three minutes in two clicks on one call to arrange a treasure at eight and five percent per annum sovcombank is closer to people tasty and 100% natural, because they are made from high- quality milk with any and care magnet buy cheaper alfa bank for any actions on the

account . st. petersburg hosts an informal summit leaders of the cis countries vladimir putin assesses the relationship between the participants as a true strategic partnership will tell and show the key statements. on civilians again the blows were reported from the american