Skip to main content

tv   Tipichnaya Ukraina  RUSSIA24  October 9, 2022 5:31pm-6:06pm MSK

5:31 pm
up to fifty percent of the symptoms of prostate adenoma should not distract me, so i take vitaprost. it restores the work of the prostate, helping to reduce the manifestation of adenoma. and i enjoy the life of vitaprost because it works. the vtb team will offer a solution. order a free card from vtb and get 1,000 rubles. cashback 2% for everything you are used to and payment was ordered by infinity. show your vtb card for free right now. come to vtb and everything will turn out new clothes in the store. a view in any incomprehensible situation. making a european protocol online is easier than it seems public services national project digital economy point bank for entrepreneurs and enterprises.
5:32 pm
hello. kirill vyshinsky is with you, and this is a typical ukraine program. remind me, our program is not news, we record it in advance and go out on a weekly basis. we don't compete with news releases. we talk about what made ukraine the way we know it today, a typical and, of course, a peculiar path here that little russia went through from the ussr ukraine before it ended up in current point. that's what we're interested in, we hope that it's interesting for you, and that's what we'll talk about
5:33 pm
today. the history of the referendum in ukraine is an instructive lesson for the eyes of the people, why they didn’t want to hear the expert’s opinion in kiev sweet brands of novorossia, what they sold in warsaw and paris. a referendum is a nationwide poll or vote to solve important problems of national regional or local significance . and zaporozhye passed referendums, the inhabitants of these territories made their choice in favor of unification with russia, it is high time to remember the history of the popular vote in the ukrainian lands and understand why today's decision was largely predetermined by politics in ukraine since its independence. the first
5:34 pm
regional referendum in ukraine was held back in the days of the ussr in january 1991, the inhabitants of crimea, who at that time was a region, voted for the return of the status of the autonomous republic of crimea to it, wanted to be an all-union autonomy with the right to sign a new union treaty and remain together with russia at any turn of events, but kiev recognized its autonomy only within the framework of ukraine memorable ninety-first was rich in referent in march, the all-union referendum on the preservation of the ussr was held on it, more than 70% of ukrainians voted for the union, 28 were against along with this in three regions john frankivska of lviv and ternopil, a local galician referendum was held on it, in defiance of the union, everyone asked if you want ukraine to become an independent state and independently solve all issues of internal and
5:35 pm
foreign policy. yes, 88.3% of those who voted answered, it became obvious that in the west of ukraine in the union, which means that many do not want to live together with russia. despite the results of the march referendum in support of the ussr, already in december 1991, after the adoption in the rada of the act of state independence, and hence the withdrawal from the ussr, all ukrainians were invited to vote for or against this decision against the backdrop of general euphoria and parades of sovereignty in the republics of the ussr, but it was powerful 90% of those who voted were in favor, but even then in ukraine fault lines were outlined, if the act of independence in the three regions of galina was not supported by only about one percent of those who voted, then in the donetsk lugansk and odessa regions every
5:36 pm
tenth in crimea was against it, and there was a record at all. and who said no about independence 42% of residents and 39% in sevastopol in the same ninety-first, ukrainian independence was recognized with reservations in transcarpathia at the same time as the all-ukrainian local referendum was held there. transcarpathians wanted the status of an autonomous region for the region, but under pressure from kiev the wording was changed to campaign for the future president himself, kravchuk, and instead of autonomy to vote. they issued a phrase about a special self-governing administrative territory, this status was supported by more than 70% of those who voted. however, no special law was adopted in kiev following the results of the referendum. the disdainful attitude of the authorities towards the opinions of people in the regions and the maidan chaos in the system of power launched the centrifugal processes
5:37 pm
of the territory began to separate and crimea was the first to do this in 2014 by holding a referendum on history the nationwide vote in ukraine in the story of anna efimova crimea march 16, 2014 is a date that is written in different ways in the history books of both russia and independent ukraine . over 80% of voters gave a concrete answer, the vast majority of voters supported the annexation of crimea to russia was carried out legitimately from the point of view of ukrainian laws, it is enough to say that, let's say, issues related to the organization of life sevastopol, uh, the decision was made on february 24.
5:38 pm
all this was carried out by the current corps of deputies, 49 people voted 75 deputies who were elected, as we say in ukraine , according to ukrainian laws. at the same time , the ukrainian ministry of internal affairs operated in the city, the security service of ukraine operated for the inhabitants of the peninsula. you asked two questions for the reunification of crimea with russia as a subject of the russian federation or for the restoration of the constitution of the republic of crimea of ​​1992 and for the status of crimea as part of ukraine, questionnaires were prepared on ukrainian russian and crimean tatar languages. in this case, it does not matter what nationality is, what matters most is the inner freedom of a person. here we are now getting what we have been waiting for all these decades in practice. we got it thanks to the russians. the date of the popular vote on the status of
5:39 pm
the peninsula changed several times initially. it was may 25, 2014, then the referendum was postponed, finally march, then, due to political circumstances, they moved the final date to on march 16, the results of the referendum became news number one for the world media, and the kiev authorities were well aware of the long-standing aspirations of the crimean autonomy to become part of russia, and took countermeasures during the first round. e presidential elections in ukraine in the ninety-fourth year. e summer. uh, sevastopol residents conducted a survey. uh, again, about, uh, the russian status of sevastopol, these examples they are ultimately. eh, great to the fact that the russian spring could take place in 94-95. well, alas. e.v. in general, e conflict situations between our pro-russian. and there and skillful work of the hut. uh, well, shyness and maybe not even
5:40 pm
the decisiveness of the toothless from moscow and vice versa, the stubbornness of the activity of the purposefulness of kiev led to the fact that such manifestations and even decisions of people were not implemented in practice any large-scale people's will, expression on pressing issues after the adoption of the law and ukraine on referendums, it actually turned out to be impossible in 2012, president yanukovych signed a document according to which any federalization or separation of part of the territory was excluded, in principle. and so, when they adopted this law, they did not write it down. so it's just hard to implement. here, if we try. yes, because it is necessary to collect signatures, and there, in my opinion, there are about 3 million in all regions, evenly. it is unrealistic for us citizens to do this, so political parties can do it in due time for strengthening the role of popular vote in the country. the leader of the batkivshchyna party, yulia tymoshenko, was pleased, she noted that a referendum we should take place in the country as
5:41 pm
often as sunrise and sunset. however, in reality. the authorities preferred to resolve all important issues without taking into account popular opinion. so it was with the promises of president zelensky on a referendum on the scandalous law on the sale of land to foreigners in the same way hushed up the discussion of ukraine's accession to nato, his predecessor petro poroshenko, our strategic goal is our accession to nato by the way, back in 2006, the referendum on ukraine's accession to nato her participation in the one economic space with russia, kazakhstan and belarus tried to initiate the notorious ukrainian opposition politician viktor medvedchuk collected 4 1/2 million signatures, however, president yushchenko opinion. citizens of ukraine ignored and did not move him and the decision of the kiev court in favor of holding a national referendum. the results promised to be contrary to the western course of official kiev collected signatures and did not allow
5:42 pm
to register everything, they understood that at that time the people would have definitely voted against us, however they were on ukraine and such high-profile cases when the results of referendums already held at the state level were completely ignored, so it was in 2000 under president kuchma, when the verkhovna rada decided not to take into account the results of the vote in favor of reducing the number of deputies, the abolition of parliamentary immunity and the transformation of a bicameral parliament. the issue of federalization had already become an issue by the 2000s. uh, you know , toxic enough. i emphasize when i reminded you for a reason that in donetsk, when i was 1994, the referendum on the day of the election to the supreme council, there the majority supported federalization, but with the adoption of the constitution of 1996 and kuchma’s actions in the second, when he was already in his second presidential term , then there were over uh aimed at his administration is for ukraine to be preserved and become a unitary state. according to the letter
5:43 pm
of ukrainian law, a referendum on changing the territorial structure. only the verkhovna rada has the right to appoint referendums, and self-determination in 2014 in lugansk and donetsk in kyiv was considered illegitimate by the ukrainian authorities. they prevented their holding in every possible way, blocked databases, destroyed ballots, intimidated those who voted to admonish the population of donbass, a volunteer battalion was sent to the region. dnepr fired at living people. then there was a very clear position in the donbass, a clear positioning, the overwhelming majority of the population opposed the maidan, i once again remind you that the questions of the beginning of february, raise any ukrainian company, just testifies to the fact that the majority of people already opposed the maidan, the majority, if we compare the situation with our liberated territories. e with the donbass, then uh definitely uh, the crimeans of sevastopol hmm and
5:44 pm
all these processes do not just support them, they consider the results of the last september referendums in the liberated territories in the world to be natural. of course, they traditionally do not recognize it, however, it seems that the voters themselves simply do not pay any attention to this anna esenova valery savelyev anastasia popova is a typical ukraine about the experience of referendums on the ukrainian lands and about the attitude of the central authorities towards them. we will talk with our permanent expert to historians, political scientist rostislav. ishchenko rostislav good afternoon. good afternoon rostislav. why in ukraine is unitary in its structure in the country e in the nineties there were so many referendums in the regions. that's just the ninety-first - this is the size of both the crimea and transcarpathia. in the ninety-first , it was still just being decided. eh, what will be the state? i'm because the constitution is finally adopted in
5:45 pm
the ninety-sixth year, and before that the soviet constitution was still in force, it also assumed non -package, that is, integrity, there were no uh regions of autonomous districts and the like. absolutely right. they would not know the ukrainian state at all, so even at one time the proposal was rejected call the ukrainian republic or the republic of ukraine because some said, what if there will be a monarchy or something else, it means that they simply called ukraine yes, uh, here, well, respectively, supporters federalization, they have always been in western ukraine in the east. let me remind you that chernovol , for example, the leader of ukrainian nationalists, was at one time a supporter of federalization. he proceeded from the fact that western ukraine is too weak to resist eastern and to defend the interests of western ukraine at the state level. he believed that the country should be a federal law and then, uh, the regions will have their representation on a mandatory basis at the highest legislative level.
5:46 pm
easier to fight for your self. that's it later. it turned out that western ukraine successfully suppresses eastern and then they lost interest in federalization. on the contrary, he woke up in the east, but initially there were not many supporters in a unitary state. rather, it was the state executive branch that supported the unitary state. because they are easier to manage. yes, but the local authorities were trying all the time to get as much authority as possible. by the way, this is understandable, even from the point of view of commercialization, there was a struggle over who would control the main financial flows. the most scandalous referendum in ukraine was held in 2000 , 29 million. people came to the polling station and voted for a number of questions, including answering in the affirmative to the question of whether the country needs a second chamber, where the interests of the regions could just be represented, and they could be resolved somehow harmonize. and yet . ah, central government. as a result, e did not
5:47 pm
approve the results of this referendum, that is, people expressed their will, the direct form of the birth of power was implemented, but there was no result, why did this happen? well, because the executive power in the person of kuchma did not have the will to put pressure. but the fact is that that referendum was also, uh, a referendum of direct action, that is, uh, its decision. uh, the rada was obliged to implement the constitution, which means, but uh, the supreme rada, since then there was already a serious position. after all, this is a referendum. just assumed the federalization of the country. well, the first step is not precisely federalization, because it was supposed to create the second chamber of parliament in the upper house, which represented the regions means, and this is exactly what it is. eh, as a matter of fact. uh, a federal state in a unitary is not necessary. uh, the second chamber doesn't need
5:48 pm
representation from the legions. here and uh, since at this time already supporters, the future looking for a puppy. this means the ukrainian functionalists, which means their american friends, were preparing to seize all power. that federalization did not interest them, they were just interested in a unitary structure. means, which allowed to get the presidency get almost all the power in their hands. this means that they subsequently isolated themselves, so this one is at the level. here is the decision of this referendum. they were seriously sabotaged. and in the end , a few votes were not enough to finally approve it, while parliament. he simply fell into a constitutional conflict, on the one hand, the rada is obliged to comment on the decision of the referendum, and on the other hand, each deputy votes independently in accordance with his conscience. and as she
5:49 pm
tells him, and it is impossible to influence in any way. here they did not vote that now heaps was the option to enter the presidential specified to enter. e to approve the results of the referendum. so, well, let's say, dissolve the rada in connection with this, start the next elections already there for a two-cameral parliament in accordance with the deprivation of the referendum. i think that, of course, there would be a fairly major political scandal, a major political crisis, but in the end, then they would be happy to submit, then the americans did not yet have this weight in the ukraine of the state. yes it certainly was in an interesting state it one of the few preserving its integrity. yes , it was one of the few constitutional events carried out during his lifetime with the participation of medvedchuk, which really went absolutely to the benefit of the state, and were almost implemented. if this
5:50 pm
event had been implemented, then, most likely, all the other maidans would have happened and a civil war would not have happened. wouldn't be under it. uh, then sufficient uh political base. let's get back to the referendum. can we say that the processes that were men in 2014 and the crimean referendum today received a logical continuation. and what could be next? well, yes, they got a logical offer, because the crimean referendum was the first demonstration of the united states, which means that russia is ready to resist in ukraine, well, there were no military operations in crimea, in fact there was none, but the army was and it can be said lucky, because that the crimean operation was really, brilliantly planned. brilliant held. this was the first demonstration by the united states that everything itself did not go to a different line. there were even attempts from kiev to create a mechanism. uh, interactions of life together. the free
5:51 pm
economic zone is what was discussed in the rada enough at the beginning at the beginning the united states did not come to a ready-made one, they did not have a ready- made political solution in half a year. they decided to push further while connecting four more areas. this is the answer to the united states. this is now the russian territory from the russian territory of russia cannot leave, so now the geopolitical landscape has changed that in the long term, people who voted for joining russia will get to join russia, they will live in russia. on the whole, it is clear that the choice in favor of russia is a choice and in favor of a better life is also simple, because russia is much more powerful and much more prosperous state. she is able to provide, unlike ukraine well, yes, she is able to provide. e to your people. uh, it hurts better living conditions and in the end. russia is independent of the state. she doesn't fight for american interests, but if fighting for their
5:52 pm
own interests. thank you very much for an interesting story. there are two brands in the south of novorossia, which are known far beyond the borders of this region. these are kherson watermelons, both had poplar cherries, both became protected by geographical trademarks, melons began to be engaged in this region in the middle of the 19th century. under the scorching sun, the kherson steppes caused so many watermelons that they were taken to all major cities of the russian empire, st. petersburg. to moscow odessa warsaw watermelon. kherson is not only a regional brand, but also a separate variety. and if the residents of astrakhan are ready to argue about whose berries are tastier with kherson residents, then scientists are 100% sure that kherson watermelons get sick less. melitopol sweet cherry is also a separate variety, it was brought to the ussr at a local
5:53 pm
experimental station. another widely known one was also created here. sweet berries valery chkalov on sandy soil near melitopol, sweet cherries have been grown since the end of the 19th century, and already at the beginning of the 20th century they were imported to paris, where sellers melitopol sweet cherry had its own brand store? about what the agriculture of the black sea lands of novorossia is famous for in the story of olga mokhovaya watermelon our kherson simply delicious catalog such from 8 to 15 kg or in russian watermelons in those years. here , only a few tars collected huge crops; the tradition of growing gourds in the northern
5:54 pm
the black sea coast is kept at the highest level and to this day the region is ideal for this place. first of all, these are positive sums of temperatures, somewhere a warm period further this soil is rich soil, plus everything is water. plus, these are human hands - this is the mind. well, and, of course, hearts, because farming. only those who are devoted to people can do this. where did the watermelon come from in the kherson steppes from western europe of the ottoman empire or from the crimean tatars, unknown for certain in russian official documents, it was first mentioned in 1796 year in connection with the watermelon riot of sailors who seized the trade carts in nikolaev, the active agricultural development of the northern black sea region began in the second half of the 18th century from the moment these lands became part of the russian empire by peoples of all kinds, all
5:55 pm
settlers. traditions rushed here, and agriculture, which they were already familiar with. these were greeks, armenians, moldavians, germans, representatives of the balkan peoples, the bulk of the settlers were peasants from russian provinces, too, more than ever. e don cossack army to say professed the principle of no extradition from the don. eh, also potemkin actually professed the same principle in relation to those serfs who moved to the territory. e, novorossiya, who resorted here to the northern black sea coast, were ready to develop these territories to plow these lands by the middle of the 19th century in the kherson province with garden and melon crops annually. planted up to 50,000 acres of land by the beginning of the 20th century from kherson and odessa after harvesting in august september sent daily to the rest of russia and for export from 140 to 250 wagons of watermelons
5:56 pm
and melons. during the soviet years, kherson breeders worked closely with colleagues from astrakhan, recognized as the russian watermelon capital at that time, varieties were created that were resistant to major diseases. so they were supposed to give marketable products in a certain amount no less than that defined there. e harvest and of course they had to be kept and above all. they should have been tasty if the breeding variety kherson among the watermelons there is none, the cake variety melitopol cherry is known in the middle of the 20th century, and more than one melitopol black earlier. red and dessert ones were bred. at the local experimental horticulture station named after sidorenko, several dozen varieties come from here. in 2019. ukraine occupied the sixth place in the world in terms of production of melitopol sweet cherries in it. the fourth part of ukraine is one of the main players, in general, cherries do mainly. ah, unique
5:57 pm
climatic features. the main region is tavria and this is primarily zaporozhye kherson nikolaev odessa region, but to be honest, in the dnepropetrovsk region, by and large, the same cherries are no less. well, uh, yes, and in poltava in sumy throughout a decent territory until the thirties of the last century, all varieties grown in the soviet union of sweet cherries were foreign ; the city of andrey korvatsky, and already at the beginning of the twentieth century, the melitopol cherry flaunted at exhibitions in paris to france bird cherry. as the europeans called it, it was the melitopol sweet cherry that was delivered in large wooden barrels in a special sweet brine. well, literally the size of a small apricot, it probably makes a huge impression, of course. this is a large black cherry. well, calculations again. uh,
5:58 pm
along roadsides and in yards, anywhere, actually the culture is quite unpretentious. painting from cherries fair cherry boulevard elections of the cherry queen annually in june in melitopol held a cherry festival in 2020, this melitopol fruit received the title of a geographical brand, and in 2022, local farmers resumed its deliveries to the crimea, which were stopped 8 years ago olga mokhova anastasia popova valeriy savelyev typical, ukraine that's all we wanted to talk about. kirill vyshinsky was with you today. see you soon.
5:59 pm
where once the russian flag is raised, it should not go down. preventive war against russia suicide for fear of death russia an icy desert where a dashing man walks russia - it is a riddle wrapped in a mystery and placed inside a puzzle. the russians don't come across as warlike, but don't step on their feet. there are no experts on russia, only different levels of incompetence. to be an honest prince of perm, maybe i'm not a man. soul
6:00 pm
trouble will come for you. don't go for the stone. no, it belongs to me. i will kill them all. the heart of parma at 18:00, in moscow and
6:01 pm
in simferopol, on the crimean bridge, car traffic was launched at that moment, deputy prime minister marat announced this on two lanes out of four khusnullin on the road part. lighting was adjusted, new markings were applied and the barrier fence was restored. while the bridge is allowed to pass only for passenger cars, the path for them was opened a few hours after yesterday's emergency , initially only reverse traffic was this movement. now it is already possible to move along two lanes at once, as for heavy trucks, and ferries are now transporting them between the peninsula and the mainland. allied forces repelled the offensive of the armed forces in the okopyansk direction today about this the ministry of defense reported. and emphasizing that the ukrainian units were reinforced by foreign mercenaries, the military department notes that they
6:02 pm
made several attempts to attack, but they were all prevented . belogorovka. lugansk people's republic disputed birch bark, yakovlevka solidarity. artyomovsk and zaitsev of the donetsk people's republic destroyed over 120 ukrainian military personnel, three tanks, seven armored combat vehicles and 11 vehicles in the zaporozhye direction, the enemy made unsuccessful attempts to advance. all attacks by units of russian troops were repelled on the positions of russian troops in the areas of settlements in the oktyabrskaya donetsk people's republic. formation of military personnel of the armed forces of ukraine, two tanks, five armored combat vehicles and six vehicles with high-precision weapons of the russian aerospace forces, there were strikes on
6:03 pm
points of temporary deployment of units foreign mercenaries, a foreign region on the island, and a special forces brigade bars of the ministry of internal affairs of ukraine near the city, zaporozhye, in chisinau, another anti-government rally was organized by its opposition party shorts, according to estimates that about 60,000 people gathered for the action, the participants call for the resignation of president maia sandu and the cabinet of ministers and demands increased financial assistance to teachers, doctors, students and pensioners. all citizens of moldova are required to compensate for the high cost gas electricity prices, which rose from last year seven times the protests. moldavian, the opposition has been holding since mid- september. he promises even more massive rallies if the authorities do not comply with the demands of the demonstrators. the chinese ambassador to the united states thanked elon musk for his proposal to make taiwan a special administrative region of the people's republic of china, the diplomat noted on his twitter that the principle of one country two systems is key for beijing, he also
6:04 pm
stressed that after reunification, taiwan will be able to enjoy a high degree of autonomy as a special administrative region recall that status issues, the island's american businessman commented on friday, in his opinion, the current situation is likely to end in conflict. in order to avoid it, beijing should act following the example of hong kong and macau, belgrade also made an offer to join the eu in exchange for acceptance with the un. what serbian president aleksandar vučić himself said, this initiative was prepared by representatives of germany and france, but the head the states of exchange rejected it contrary to the constitution in his speech. vujicic also recalled the events, or rather the behind-the-scenes conversation of the ninety- ninth year, then, according to him, bill clinton demanded that budapest conduct a ground operation against his native country. as for the body? now i’ll tell you something that you didn’t know in 1999 , hungary was supposed to
6:05 pm
attack serbia with ground forces, which was confirmed to me by hungarian prime minister viktor orban and allowed to tell the public about it from him by american president bill clinton demanded, like the british, that they attack the republic of serbia in the north, that we stretch our forces to vojvodina. what viktor orban refused , he was under great pressure and german chancellor gerhard schroeder helped him cope with this after advertising all of russia 24 will continue anton krasovsky's documentary referendum. often difficult urination can be a sign of prostatitis. try vitaprost tablets. vitaprost restores the function of the prostate, and not just eliminates the symptoms, and you enjoy life vitaprost, because it works. in any strange situation

6 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on