will not be considered a violator in a simplified manner, existing license permits will be extended, certificates of some of such permits will be automatically extended, in addition , simplifications are established for the activities of self-regulatory organizations in the field of industrial safety in the field of protection of cultural objects in the field of appraisal activities, as well as accreditation of the national system another important question arises. how to deal with the execution of government contracts if the supplier of the enterprise is an organization due to mobilization? well, for example, when mobilizing the individual entrepreneur himself or his employees, the organization cannot ensure high- quality timely execution of the state contract, the terms of such a contract can be changed by agreement of the parties. penalties will not be collected from businessmen

and they will not be included, which is important in the register of unscrupulous suppliers. and this gives them the opportunity to enter into public contracts in the future, the rule on changing the approach will affect all public contracts that will be concluded until the end of 2023, now about grants will change the terms of grants for individual entrepreneurs who were called up for partial mobilization. yes, such conditions will be reviewed, in particular for grants for social and young entrepreneurs, which are issued by the ministry of economic development. if the entrepreneur has already received a grant for his project, then he will be able to suspend the fulfillment of obligations without any fines or investigations or return the entire amount of the grant to the recipient of the grant if he is called. participation in a special military

operation may count on easing the requirements that apply to the implementation of his grant after the completion of partial mobilization activities, grant recipients will be able to conclude an additional agreement and adjust the timing and results of their project. for example, extending the project implementation period is another important issue regarding pension provision, this issue is equally of concern to both employees and individual entrepreneurs themselves, that form pension rights. previously, it was already decided that the period of service in the armed forces. it is protected both in retirement and in seniority. now there are questions regarding the accounting for the length of service of those categories of citizens who are now forming their pension rights on preferential terms. in particular, they receive the so -called northern experience or experience, which gives

the right to early registration of a pension. the task is to maintain such favorable conditions for calculating the length of service even during the period when a citizen is undergoing military the mobilization service, the government of the russian federation is currently developing features for accounting for such length of service so that the rights of citizens are preserved. these were shots of a briefing on social and humanitarian issues, deputy minister of labor and social protection olga batalina answered questions related to partial mobilization. well, now let's return to the briefing by the official representative of the russian ministry of foreign affairs, maria zakharova, of international structures, primarily the united nations in russia, which is clearly not in a hurry to condemn malicious statements estonian minister of foreign affairs. however, in other similar situations that are not connected with russia, they react promptly and all the time pull back those who

have lost, in general, some sense of reality is double - these are standards. yes, perhaps, you can say that, in fact. this is simply what kills the modern international legal foundations - double standards have gone so far that they touched the really basic of our world order, which was based on international law. these double standards provoke corrosion international relations international relations must have an understandable, clear and transparent basis, as western partners say, the basis must be understood. based on what principles we all operate. but unfortunately, many of the mentioned organizations turn out to be simply obedient executors of the will of the collective west

; they act on the basis of their own discretion or are held hostage. well, i think there is a lot to be said on this subject, and i think that much will be said by political scientists and experts now in the future. here is another example. because it's going on in international relations today, the washington made a new attempt to use the platform of the regional organization of the western hemisphere of the organization of american states to promote its anti-russian agenda. they can unite only against us, this is what for some reason in washington is considered as the only one that is effective today. for them, a unifying agenda, it’s hard to say why, but such a choice was made, here is a specific example at the one held in the capital of peru lima the fifth-seventh of october. uh, fifty-second session. its general assembly, with the filing of the americans, was pushed through an anti-russian

statement, by the way, it does not have the status of an official document, it quote is condemning the russian special operation in ukraine end of quote. at the same time, despite being on the fact, uh hmm, the pressure that was exerted on the regionals. and despite the efforts of the white house, the initiative was not supported by the authoritative and influential states in the region, now the colon argentina brazil mexico and bolivia gonus salvador saint vincent grenadine. and dominic, taking into account not participating in the session. venezuelan cuba. nicaragua, which has already left this organization or is in the process of leaving , almost a third of the states of the posterior western hemisphere did not join the anti-russian attack, which was initiated by washington. as a matter of fact, this reflected the unwillingness of latin americans to unconditionally submit to the will of the

united states of america and then americans to organize a solidarity judgment of our country and past referendums. on the site oak actually failed in this regard, we cannot fail to note that the incitement to such steps is carried out by the state, which has on its account its vast experience of interfering in the affairs of other countries, including the military. latin america and the region in general remembers and knows what i am talking about, the results of these actions are known to all and very sad loss of life, destruction. latin america is definitely no exception. in this case, the opposite is true. this is the rule of how the usa operates and what is part or the essence of their logic. i would like to remind you that countries the region has already been burned once. and on this platform, i mean the organization of american states, following the format of us interests when they were simply

used against the legitimate government. venezuela remember yes, how was the place? in the organization in the nineteenth year was illegally transferred to the representative of the self-proclaimed so -called president juan guido, and even then the united states of america played a key role in this. but after washington's unsuccessful attempts to overthrow the official authorities in coraxi, his presence in the american organization the state looks more like just nonsense, but now the truth is washington has other interests. now, all of a sudden, well, something happened in the energy markets in the global energy sector , because, well, suddenly he sharply admitted that the government was in the crucian of the official power of venezuela and everyone who was then forced to bend under pressure from the united states just remained fools. but the

same rule needs to be learned once, because this is a rule, because they always act in this way in their own interests, force others to abandon their national indigenous interests from traditions from from the future sometimes, and then when the washington wind changes, it turns out. that only the united states of america has interests, although now the removal of the pseudo-representative e from participation did not take place on procedural points , it is obvious to everyone that this is only a matter of time, and in fact, the realities of the day speak about this, it seems that this circumstance is well understood even in washington, it is not by chance that the americans. considered for good. just don't shine the worlds. juan guaydon forum advised them to refrain from trips to the general assembly. that is, they they simply throw everyone and those who were forced to recognize the guido, and now those who are the team of the guido too. this is the first time this is the first time it has

always been like this everywhere. what happened at the site of the organization of american states indicates how much the interests of the united states and the states of latin america diverge, for which it is not russophobic hysteria that comes to the fore today, but pragmatic issues of energy food security of migration, the fight against drug trafficking, but counteraction pandemic recovery from its effects on these tracks. we are ready for constructive cooperation with the regionals, which was confirmed by russian foreign minister sergei lavrov in his recent interview with the arguments and facts weekly, we will definitely place the link in the text of today's briefing in this interview. uh, head of the russian foreign ministry. stressed the following: we do not put latin americans in front of a choice with whom to cooperate. we stand for pragmatic and dialogic relations with the countries of latin america.

america and the caribbean in all areas of mutual interest. well , what is happening around ukraine now is absolutely. a logical conclusion, traditional for the west, first of all, the anglo-saxons from the anglo-saxons, just their next company, which they ingloriously carried out like this. we have talked about various historical examples many times, but today it seems to me a good reason to recall one more. although i say it again, this is a single example of what they do regularly exactly, because it is in these days. just over 20 years ago, namely on october 7, the american

-nato military company enduring freedom started. here, where would you think, i am now addressing not those who, uh, are a specialist in international relations, maybe those who are, but simply a representative of a wide audience, where do you think, now, in 20 years, of course, they have succeeded, where is the region of indestructible freedom now? here in afghanistan it is the declared goal of the united states and nato was the destruction of terrorism under the slogan retribution for the terrorist attacks in new york 11 september 2001. that is, for the terrorist attacks that take place on the territory of the united states of america, they carry out retaliation operations that last more than 20 years. well, 20 years. their closest

allies in a similar behavior, they absolutely justify even without understanding the right or not, and we are denied to defend our territory, even when for many years, listening to threats. and by the way , reflecting attempts to carry out terrorist attacks, there were. how well you yourself know, based on the statements of our special services, there were quite a few. and we chose the path of peace negotiations for an international legal solution to existing problems. we are now denied that we can defend ourselves from those who carry out such actions on our territory. well, back to the experience, the enjoyment of enduring liberties by the united states. america in afghanistan is over. this was not an operation. it

was a twenty-year-old bathing, which ended at the end of august 21 with a frantic flight of american and nato military skunks, where at that time they had already come to power, or shameful outcome, washington's longest-running military campaign is clearly the experiment of several administrations in their understanding of forcible planting. the word of democracy in afghanistan has failed the problem of terrorism has not been resolved continues to be a very acute side is in an economic humanitarian crisis. and why well , because they were destroyed for 20 years. here i really like it. i think we'll talk more about that today, uh, let's talk. i like how now the representatives of the baltic countries germany poland started and started shout that you have no right to build a bridge on territory that does not belong to you. well, about the territories that belong to us, but we are not going to start, after all, the referendum should have been

respected and the will of the people, but we still built it. and you, nato members, did not even build on foreign territories that do not belong to you. you destroyed everything, afghanistan is an example of this, and then you just took it and stole it. all the money in this country, well, just because, because, apparently you need them more, or what? i understand that debt usa 31 trillion dollars is not sure that the money of afghanistan of the afghan people will help a lot, but on the other hand, this gesture will really help to understand the whole essence of what is happening with the so -called democracy in the west despite the fact that the full responsibility for the current situation in afghanistan lies washington first. well, of course, nato as a whole, but washington is in charge there, the americans are evading post-conflut obligations to this restoration of this state, moreover, completely and the country west continue to block the afghan avars,

solving local government resources to rebuild the economy to ensure the security of the fight against terrorism. we strongly urge westerners to completely unblock the accounts of the central bank of afghanistan as soon as possible. we believe that such half- measures as the creation of an afghan, rostov fund from newly stolen funds. okay, let's keep calling them frozen. hmm, frozen flats or frozen steals , of course, all these half-measures are hypocritical , they are not enough for a full-scale reconstruction . afghan infrastructure economy. there we already consider it unacceptable to link the provision of humanitarian assistance to any political conditions. and here, too, in the context of the situation around ukraine on october 7. was attacked by the russian embassy in moldova, maliciously fired fireworks at our diplomatic mission, fortunately, the members of their

families who were on the territory did not suffer any damage. embassy building. all this happened, with the direct connivance of the moldavian carabinieri guarding the complex. they did not stop in a timely manner the actions of the assailant called to the scene by the staff. the ministry of internal affairs of moldova arrived. only an hour later, the security information service of the republic did not react at all. could they do it themselves without a design from above, of course not, in fact the russian embassy sent the moldovan side, but before the protest with the demand to investigate the incident while treating the perpetrators to account and allowing similar situations in the future. we hope that they will hear us in chisinau, but, apparently, they take an example from their elders, and comrades, but such, and shares pass. and in the united states in relation to our diplomatic missions in canada and countries, by the way, the european union. the situation, of course, in

particular with the aforementioned hmm incidents in moldova , outrageous almost from the very beginning of the special war operation in ukraine , anti-russian actions are not allowed to take place in the building of the russian embassy in moldova, but to carry out the normal activities of the embassy. recently . they are accompanied by attempts to openly intimidate our employees, the moldovan authorities do not intervene in the situation. just withdrew into a response to repeated demands to comply with the vienna convention on diplomatic relations in 1961 , according to which the host state is obliged to prevent violations of the peace, such as representation and insult. eh, in any form. us. they say that everything possible is being done. and for what, in order for this to continue. meanwhile , the ugly tricks at our embassy in chisinau continue and i would like to hope that the moldovan side will still find an opportunity to fulfill its international legal obligations or sign, in the end, that he can

not do this or does not want to. it simply does not feel like a connection with any conventions, but an obligation to ensure the functioning of the security of the russian diplomatic mission. chisinau has. e. that's exactly what russia is doing with respect to the moldovan embassy in moscow and er, i would like to move on to answering your questions. is the magazine of international life with us? hello maria vladimirovna hello literally. yesterday. we archean turku demanded to remove the russian consulate from the city, how could you comment on this speech? well, this is a new attempt by russophobic-minded finnish politicians to earn cheap popularity for themselves by provoking another confrontational step towards russia, a.s. quite predictable consequences, of course, let's see how this will be

reacted to such ideas in the ministry of foreign affairs, finland, the practical implementation of such initiatives, of course, will entail, and immediate response from the russian federation. i think that the finnish side e should not have any illusions in this, so we will follow the development. helsinki must be aware of the fact that the practical implementation of such so-called initiatives will entail immediate retaliatory measures, and once again illusions on the part of our country. it should n't be here. thank you. you have already touched on this topic a little, and yet, i would like to hear your comment, as the british minister for security affairs, in fact, tugenthat called strikes on ukrainian cities war crimes. here, how would you comment on such a statement.