depends on the skill of the operator. here are the shots of the destruction of the militants of the ukrainian formations under a coal ball, a projectile dropped from a drone hits the target accurately and endurance is the key to the success of the event grigory vdovin boris maksudov ruslan ikerov andrey rudenko and oleg bondarenko news from the dpr in kherson and in addition, destroyed several attack drones that could be used for attacks on civilian infrastructure. so what as for the situation on the ground , the enemy has practically not taken any serious offensive actions in recent days, since previous sorties cost him serious losses . russian assault aviation is working on clusters of opponents in the kherson region, the american howitzer m-3 seven was hit, which fired counter-battery fire at our artillery, the contour-battery fight is very serious we have

to constantly change firing positions, the firing mission immediately with interactive fire, the manner is different here. moreover, often the goal of ukrainian militants is not only combat vehicles, artillery, and command posts. our doctors are trying to remove special markings on ambulances so as not to become a target for the enemy, we often have to cover up the crosses , because for a long distance it is very well traced through the optics and the enemy, unfortunately, unfortunately, not by any geneva conventions, by some moral norms do not bend, and therefore sometimes we lose, first of all, with sanitary equipment that should help, and not kill for almost a week, kiev made attempts to break through the defenses of our troops on nikolaev krivoy rog. not sparing people and equipment on the chevrons of the liquidated militants, one can estimate the number of forces that kiev threw into the offensive in the kryvyi rih direction, here and 24, the mechanized brigade fifty-seventh motorized infantry, the fifteenth,

separate mountain assault battalion could not do without the nazis from the right sector and american mercenaries tactics in all cases was the same two three tank columns, with the support of light nature, ukrainian militants. at maximum speed, our anti-tank unit tried to wedge into our defenses, respectively, inflict defeat. after undermining the first two vehicles, the enemy refuses to do this and, accordingly, decrease into a grouping. yeah, if the same attacks start in the same direction, monstrous losses, confirmed, among other things, by the militants themselves, who do not hesitate to post videos of broken columns on social networks, kyiv has not taken any action for several days now. such a further attack on the territory of the kherson region mikhailandronic alexander malyshev lead now a short advertisement and that's what we'll talk about after it. the united states scares the whole world with

nuclear armageddon, and calls russia and china the main threats, but that actually artificially warms up the topic of nuclear war, where is washington aiming with its accusations and its missiles, and how can it be contained? open a free business account in alpha bank and get money for any account actions. the first buyer of new clothes in stores on avito, for vicki, children are great. and for me tenoten is peace tenoten we are the

masters of our lives. what is it like? with a profit of up to 60%, vika flew for 7 hours with a transfer and just wanted to check in as soon as possible and checked in, because she booked a hotel with a guarantee

of settling tutu will definitely be. where to stay. vladimir putin today held a meeting in st. petersburg with the general director of magat rafael grossi, during the talks, the president of russia noted that the nuclear energy sector is our days are becoming overly politicized and urged not to allow this, but the head of state also touched upon the situation around the zaporozhye nuclear power plant, which , according to putin, should be discussed in the format of an open dialogue. of course, we see that today there are elements of excessive dangerous politicization of everything connected with nuclear activity. well, we very much hope that thanks to your efforts we will be able to reduce all these areas on this account and, uh, bring this area back to normal. for our activities cooperation, despite all the turbulence of the complex processes that

are taking place on the world stage, the worldview is very glad to see you and with pleasure. let's discuss all the questions that are of mutual interest to us. or maybe even cause some anxiety. well, we also have, for example, everything related to the situation around the zaporozhye power plant there. in any case, we are open to this dialogue and rejoice in today, just stipulate. from our conversation today, they are extremely important. after all , there are topics that have a direct relation to physical thermal safety, and regarding zaporizhzhya and if i made efforts to avoid a nuclear accident, howl, which could later be detrimental to the theory of the region zaporozhye nuclear power plant

is currently operating in energy saving mode. for her own needs about this to our channel. today. in the evening rinat korcha, advisor to the general director of the rosenergo concern, said that he also denied the information that the nuclear power plant is powered by the russian energy system. well i can it is absolutely responsible to state that the information about the supply of the zaporizhzhya affeled station to the russian energy system does not correspond to reality. the power supply of the station for the so-called own needs is currently carried out along the dnieper line. zaporozhye station, like any other dark station. this is a very complex mechanism, which, in fact, does not allow us to give out what we want, and there is a lot of work ahead. the topic of nuclear war should not be artificially

heated up, the call of the russian minister foreign affairs of sergei lavrov, in a long interview for the 60 minutes program, the diplomat spoke about a possible world conflict using weapons of mass destruction, the foreign minister noted that this issue had been resolved for russia. since the nuclear policy of our country is exclusively defensive in nature. if it depends on us , the president has repeatedly said that we provide for our nuclear doctrine exclusively in response to measures that are designed to prevent the destruction of the russian federation as a result of direct nuclear strikes or strikes by other types of weapons that threaten the very existence of the russian state. minister. he also noted that western countries are constantly speculating on the topic of some preparation of moscow for nuclear provocations. as evgeny lavrov emphasized, the authors of such stuffing should be aware

of their responsibility. at the same time, if the russian nuclear doctrine excludes any ambiguous interpretations of the possibility of preventive strikes in other countries, the situation is different, moreover, if you carefully study the legislation of some states of the nuclear club. you can find a lot of alarming details, a comparative analysis was carried out by boris ivanin. nuclear weapons, as you know, are not a means of warfare, but, on the contrary, a deterrent. except the united states stopped holding back in 2018. the pentagon unveiled a new nuclear doctrine. it says that russia is one of the main threats, so the united states will continue to develop its nuclear line. it is the name of intercontinental missiles and submarines and bombers that carry nuclear warheads. but most importantly, washington intends to develop low-yield nuclear warheads, and such charges frighten even former american officials. former us assistant secretary of state thomas countryman now fears that this threatens to

turn into a new arms race and, moreover , can lead to a nuclear missile war, even during local conflicts, by the way, the russian foreign ministry warned about this and now experts continue to speak. as you yourself understand, when you use nuclear weapons, whether for tactical purposes or for some local purposes, you do not control this process. now it can be tactical, and then it can be anything, so the concept itself was vicious, but it was born on a wave of such permissiveness over the past 20-25 years america has completely forgotten how to fulfill its international obligations formally washington signed a treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, but in words the states criticized the treaty proposed in the united nations organization for its complete prohibition, as not meeting the current agenda among other potential threats. this means that the goals of the pentagon are also considering north korea and pakistan, which have nuclear weapons, but in total there are less than

a dozen countries in the nuclear club, these are the main participants, if you add up the number of warheads that nato countries have at their disposal, that is, not only the united states but also following in their formats britain and that will turn out quite well, a figure comparable to russia is more than 6,000 units. here are just approaches to the use of these units, fundamentally different and great britain france uh, reserve the right there is virtually no use of nuclear weapons, hindering the start of the use of nuclear weapons by the first in this sense as well. uh, this also poses a threat to russia, and the iron lady was about as warlike. margaret thatcher is the future prime minister of the united kingdom. she sent letters to commanders of submarines carrying nuclear warheads containing only the word fire. it was an order in case of a nuclear war, but then everything you need to know about the position of the anglo-saxons, that britain and the usa everyone knows, as they say two us non-standard if the us decides to use nuclear weapons, as they say, nothing

will help you, especially since the united states of america prefers remotely, what is called the use of its force resource. i understand that if the united states of america there, uh, reacted to the appearance of relatively speaking russian military bases in mexico yes, but when they begin to play very actively against our country again in ukraine, but this is something very serious. in my opinion, the consequences russia has long shown enviable restraint, following the concept of a retaliatory or response to a counter strike, but in 2020 the policy of nuclear deterrence was updated in a presidential decree, the conditions under which moscow can use nuclear weapons preemptively are clearly spelled out. this is the chapter, the third paragraph 19 in detail you can read on the kremlin website but here are two main points. the first is if the enemy carries strikes that will disrupt the possibility of retaliatory nuclear attacks, or the second. if there is aggression against russia with the use of conventional weapons, but this is aggression threaten their very existence.