well, uh, as you can see it goes through all these formats, they work. this means that they are in demand and our allies, our partners want to work in such formats, nothing changes in this sense, but naturally, uh, all uh, here we are paying attention to some uh events related to relations between azerbaijan and the e army on what is happening between uh, tajikistan and kyrgyzstan we all know this very well, of course partners. eh, i am interested and worried about the future development of relations in the russian-ukrainian direction. but this is the subject of discussion. it's true. nothing like that here. yes, there is no surprise, and i am their m-m partners of ours and in detail about this, informing me i tell our point of view. but this does not affect the character, quality, or depth of russia's relations with these countries. please, i will ask you. good afternoon, tass agency yulia

bubnova, yesterday you held a meeting with the leaders of kyrgyzstan and tajikistan. tell me how it went and what you managed to achieve as a result. thank you was constructive. naturally, when a sufficiently hot phase is found, then finding some common ground is not easy, but nonetheless. uh, it seems to me that we managed to do this, in any case, agree that all measures will be taken to prevent the resumption of hostilities. action. first, second, which is very important hand. here are the necessary steps for the return of refugees to and the third is also an essential important element, an essential important element. it lies in the fact that we do not pretend to any intermediary role. although frankly speaking, we were asked about this, we must talk about that both sides will give us the relevant documents and their vision of solving

this problem. and we will not only try to evaluate these proposals on our part, but also use hmm to find a solution, uh, and the documents at our disposal that could form the basis of possible agreements. i mean , why in moscow there is sometimes even more reliable information about the borders between the union republics than in the union republics themselves. we'll raise these papers, we'll raise these cards let's take a look and together with colleagues, then look for solutions. so, in general, this meeting was very useful. give it please. good evening, pavel zarubin, russia tv channel, i have a question that, it seems to me, many people in russia are now thinking about, in my opinion, the role of germany in the ukrainian conflict has not been discussed, if merkel took a concert, well, such a fairly restrained position, then scholz, as they say, let himself go in all seriousness

and with some amazing ease, germany suddenly forgot everything that russia did to unite the german people with ease, as it seems, he turned over the very difficult pages of reconciliation of peoples, and now we see it is unimaginable. just early stuff. how german guns are killing russian people again, you are a specialist in germany, how can you explain everything that is happening and how it will affect the future of our russian german relations by the choice of those people who, uh, legitimately came to power in a particular country. in this case in germany, uh, they have to decide for themselves what is more important to them. the opinion of some kind of allied obligations, as they see it, or, uh, ensuring the interests of their own people of their national interests, judging by what you said, e is the head of the chapters in this case, apparently some kind of allied obligations . uh in this

case the federal republic within the uh north atlantic alliance is that correct or not? i believe this is a mistake. uh, this mistake is paying the price. uh, business economy citizens in the federal republic, because it has negative economic consequences for both aerozones in general and for the federal republic in particular, but with its interests, apparently not enough. who is considered otherwise would not undermine the northern stream one and nord stream-2. although they didn’t work, it was like, well, it was such an element of reliability that in an extreme case they could be turned on. well, now there is no such possibility, although there is one kind of branch, as i said in moscow, after all, apparently in working order, but uh and the decision is not made, judging by everything is unlikely to be accepted, but this is no longer our business, it is the business of our partners. that's what

guides the head of one state or another, but that's their business. i have presented my version. it seems to me that this is precisely the crux of the problem . but not all at once, please. yes , who please, good evening, preferably vladimirovich before the trip to kazakhstan we met with the president of the monkey of the arab emirates here the uprising with the president of turkey in what vein during these pavilions the situation in ukraine was discussed perhaps the leaders of these countries shared with you some exclusive position of kiev, which is known only to them and also turkish, the press writes that he is now trying to organize negotiations between the battle and the western countries of the united states in britain france germany in istanbul how real this meeting is today, how much it, if it takes place will be effective if kiev does not take part and how prudent you think to include china and india in these negotiations. thank you means, well, uh,

as we know, uh, president. erdogan has already played a rather prominent role in turkey addressing a number of issues, including, let's say, it is connected with exchange. he was really personally involved in this work and, uh, there is a well-known result, so we are also grateful to him for this, because we got uh of our military officers on, among other things. this is the first. secondly, he was an active participant in organizing the export of grain from ukraine . true. unfortunately, this grain does not go or in a minimal amount goes to the poorest countries of the world along the line. he is one and the same. another question, we also discussed this with him, and during our negotiations he yesterday he spoke in favor of somehow structuring the flow of this grain and, above all, sending it to the poorest countries, uh. well, uh, the general secretary should, uh

, work on this. i know that he works, but he also succeeds in everything, which means that the united arab emirates, of course, is also ready for an intermediary role and, uh, and i must say that the president of the united harov emperors. he is doing this, including dealing with issues of the humanitarian nature of the exchange, and so on in the sky without success, because we also grateful in india, china always talks about the need to establish dialogue and solve everything peacefully , we know their position. these are our close allies partners, uh, and uh, we respect the position, but we also know the position. they kept talking about the fact that they want negotiations and kind of asked for it, and now they have made an official decision that prohibits these negotiations. well, what can we talk about here? uh, i'm in turn, how do you know, that's speaking in the kremlin m-m when uh on the decision on uh? with

as an object of the federation, he said that we are open. we have always said that we are open to us. we even , uh, reached certain agreements in istanbul. i told you the agreements were actually almost all initialed, as soon as the troops departed from kiev, the desire to conduct negotiations, the kiev authorities. it disappeared right there. that's all. e. well, if they are ripe for this, please, then, probably, the mediation efforts of everyone who is interested in this will also be in demand. yes, please. we continue the international theme. ya yezhov vesti fm and mayak is there any certainty about your trip to the g20 summit in indonesia, and if so, and if you go there, are you ready to negotiate with the president of the united states jabaiden there? well, i need to ask him if he is ready to hold such negotiations with me or not, i don’t see the need, to be honest, by and large

, as long as there is no platform for any negotiations , e has not been finally resolved, there are still questions. mm. ah, my trip there, well, russia will certainly take part in this work. e in e. in what format we will think about some kind of direct negotiations, with whomever it may be among the participants. twenties, while there is no speech , some of them we are in constant contact. as you know, they just talked about the position, er. turkey's turkish president of turkey also walk in the top twenty. he and i are in constant contact with some colleagues, too. but we have not discussed such issues with the president of the united states. good, yes, good, good afternoon konstantin paimushkin. channel one federal the security service recently reported that the explosive device that went off on the crimean bridge

was originally sent by sea on an apparently cargo ship from odessa, this fact, how will it affect russia's position regarding cargo shipping and sports in ukraine e. can we be an obstacle now, and most importantly, with regard to the grain deal, because after all, the agreement was grain, not an explosive device, will this terrorist attack destroy the grain made by the federal security services stated that, most likely, this so -called cargo, to be more precise. e explosive explosives were sent by sea from odessa. but it has not been definitely established. uh, is this done with grain trucks or not? this is a question of answering it not yet, but if humanitarian corridors for the supply of grain to the poorest countries although it does not go there, well, it was organized under this pretext. if this work turns out that

humanitarian corridors are being used to carry out terrorist acts, then, of course, this will be called into question. uh, further functioning this corridor. well well, we don't have such data yet. uh, something about civilians, it’s possible to work out the answer from russia, but first you know that, well, the answer is simple, we’ll close a simple case with an end, but uh, well, you first need to establish this information reliably, no. recently, a man was fined in moscow for listening to ukrainian music. well , it seems like a clear overkill, because so soon the film only old men go to battle can be banned, there are ukrainian motives and gogol but if the nazis listen to folk songs, sami songs about fascist do not become, as you think , and how you should treat ukrainian culture in general. i think that we all the time resent attempts to close russian culture to cancel it.

this is complete nonsense. uh, as one of our musicians said, fools mean uh, but we shouldn't. well, how to behave in the same way. uh, so, uh. hmm first second. the ukrainian language is one of the state languages ​​in the crimea in one of the constituent entities of the russian federation in the crimea. the ukrainian state language along with the tatar russian, so in itself it is illegal. uh, the third thing we have in russia, in my opinion, is somewhere around 3 million. e citizens of the russian federation living permanently with us. hmm, ukrainians. well, how can we ban their language and cultures? yes, we don’t have this in our heads, so i understand what it is connected with. it's emotional uh, emotionally in the background.

today's emotions are all happening, but i think that in many of our families they know, hear and love, uh, ukrainian and ukrainian songs, ukrainian culture. uh, everything in the soviet union was very popular. hits in ukrainian and i think that we should not be like those, but which, as i have already begun, answering your question on cancel. whatever culture you are, culture has nothing to do with it at all, if uh, if today's, uh, today's leadership in kiev considers it possible to support neo-nazis, it is possible to support torch six in the center of their large cities, uh, and uh people who walk around with nazi symbols, then this has nothing to do with ukrainian

culture, please good afternoon newspaper. izvestia love wanted to ask about mobilization. you have already mentioned that during mobilization. there are many problems and now many companies do not understand which employees will hire which not, and which ones to ask. uh, should we expect a new wave of mobilization? will there be total monetization and the 300,000 people that the head of the ministry of defense spoke about is still a relevant figure or not, and 300,000 people, yes, about whom the head of the ministry of defense spoke, is this still a relevant figure or not? yes, firstly, the ministry of defense at the beginning assumed smaller number. not 300,000 people first, second. uh, nothing extra is planned. i have not yet

received any proposals from the ministry of defense for this. and in the foreseeable future. i don't see any need for something. here, as for the stupidity, which i said is connected, it is with old forms of accounting that have not been updated for decades. and so, when they began to carry out these activities in the implementation, it was only then that it became clear what quality they were? uh, this is uh, the infobase is currently being updated on on on modern base on a modern basis, and it will be as reliable as possible, therefore, i think that the quality should also be increased, although i must say that it is work. eh, it's already over. and now e troops are 22,000 people mobilized. out of 300,000 , i think that within, well, within about two weeks, all mobilization activities will be completed. please, russia news in continuation, by the

way, the topic is here we are in kazakhstan now , as we know a lot of people who a certain number of them left after the announcement of the partial mobilization of them, and in other neighboring countries in russia, different people say someone calls a traitor in the state duma they even offered to seize their cars. and here, how do you personally feel about those who, a, left the country after september 21, would prefer to give not emotional, but legal assessments, it is necessary to give a legal assessment of the actions of a particular citizen in each specific case. someone left because something is afraid, someone left because he wants to. uh, mean to evade someone else's mobilization for some reason. in each specific case, it is necessary to give a legal connotation and act in relation to a specific person. only on this basis. well, it seems to me that there is

no other way to do it. so, please, i beg you , here is a young man in a white shirt. thank you very much gleb ivanov arguments and facts uh, again, let's take ilyich in the continuation of the topic of mobilization that several mobilized people died, and they are burying them in moscow today. uh, mobilized on september 23rd. he did not have an employee of the moscow government; he did not have military training . actually a question. how does it happen, well, when declaring partial monetization. we said that all mobilized people will undergo mandatory military training. how is it that people end up at the front even three weeks have passed since the announcement of mobilization. and in general, it dies. yes, and what do you think, now it's coming

the process of mobilization. and one more question, if i may , about the crimean bridge. uh, after the terrorist attack on the crimean bridge from your point of view , this is how security measures are now provided at strategic infrastructure facilities at railway stations at airports, and at the gas pipeline. at the power plants , uh, can we protect them thank you means, with regard to mobilization, i can say again what i said before u line of contact 1.100 km, so u keep it exclusively u with troops formed with contra formed with contractors. especially since they take an active part in offensive operations, it is practically impossible. this has to do with mobilization. first. the second all e, citizens called up as part of the mobilization must undergo training, a and she e, is as follows. so, i said 22,000 now

there are troops. more precisely, the so-called parts of the shapers. here there is primary training from 5 to 10 days, then they enter directly, depending on the military registration specialty. in the same combat units and training there from 5 to 15 days, then the next stage is already directly in the troops taking part in hostilities and there is additional coordination, but if you look from the beginning of mobilization for today, in principle, if you look at the minimum values, then in general . eh, it's possible and not only will it be impossible. so i said 22.000 22.000. we have in the troops to form them, which means 33.000.

uh, the man is mobilized already in the subdivisions. and 16.000 are in units involved in the performance of combat tasks. but if such questions arise, which are now formulated for you, i will additionally. uh, i'll give instructions to the security council. there are, uh, military people with these security features who previously served in the ministry of defense with good experience, who know their business, and are high-level and class specialists. e lady of instructions, that they conduct an inspection of how the preparation of mobilized citizens is carried out. colleagues, let's make the final one already. the issue is also a lot of time, so as not to abuse. secured, of course, after

terrorist attack on the crimean bridge, of course, the relevant services were given the task of strengthening control in order to ensure the safety of all critical infrastructure facilities and at all. appropriate measures should also be taken at them at energy facilities, at different levels of different classes at transport facilities. well, the country is big. let's hope that the work in this direction will be effective. so far, we have been able to do this, we have been able to do this, please, kommersant e. what do you think after all ukraine will be able to exist as the state of russia and the second question. eh, vladimir vladimirovich, you don't regret anything. uh, here, uh, i want to be

clear. uh, what's going on today is unpleasant to say the least, but it's still the same. we would have received a little later only in worse conditions for us. that's all. so that the action is correct and timely. will ukraine exist? hmm will ukraine be able to exist as a state ? will russia be able? no, of course, they took at one time 2.5 million people live in crimea, but i took 400 and i will cut it off. well, the troops had to go in and open the water to the crimea. here, as a simple example, the e logic of our actions would not have done this e action, there would have been no opposition in others. the bridge has been blown up. now we need to think 10 times, and

how important is the provision of communication with crimea across the territory? this is for the russian federation . you see, yes, yes, evaluate the effectiveness. how do you rate their effectiveness and what the likelihood that it is precisely such massive strikes that will still have to be delivered. well now there is no need for massive strikes. now there are other tasks, because, uh, from my point of view. in my opinion, there are seven 29 objects there, which means that they were not hit, as it was planned by the ministry of defense, but they are getting these objects gradually and there is no need for massive strikes, but in any case, for now, but it will be seen there. thank you very much everything. thank you. well, let's, the final one is good, the final one. yes, thank you very much news.

ah, nato says directly that the defeat of ukraine will be a defeat for the alliance. what do you think? eh? is it possible that nato is leading troops to the territory of ukraine if the state of affairs on the battlefield for kiev becomes catastrophic, you know, right? this is a question of concepts, a question of legal technique. what is the defeat of ukraine, everyone can understand it differently. that's what, uh, crimea became, uh, a subject of the russian federation in 2000 there in the fourteenth year this defeat or what, what is it? here you need to understand what it is such, but in any case, the introduction of some troops into direct contact in direct e in direct clash with the russian army. this is a very dangerous step that could lead to a global catastrophe. i hope that those who speak about this have enough sense of reason

not to take such dangerous steps. thank you so much. best wishes. the task of destroying ukraine is not set now, it is acting correctly and in a timely manner, vladimir putin said today at a press conference following the results of his visits, kazakhstan to a direct question. you are nothing do not regret, there was no less unambiguous answer. this is what i want to be clear. uh, what's happening today is unpleasant to say the least, but it's all the same. we would have received a little later only in the worst conditions for us. that's all.