according to the account, the configuration of the world gas market can be seriously affected by vladimir putin's unexpected proposal to the turkish leadership to create a large gas hub for the country, turkey can become the largest player in the gas market without having large reserves of its own in this paradox. the turkish leadership can explain it very simply. so far, in any case, it is pursuing a balanced policy regarding the preservation of its national interests. confirmation of this is very quickly the reaction of turkish president recep taip and erdogan to the proposal of our president. i remember, and a couple of days ago, russian president vladimir putin put forward the idea of ​​​​transferring russian gas export volumes to the black sea region and creating the largest gas hub in turkey, the

country's president supported and announced that an international gas hub would be created in the european part of the country in the kra can be transferred to the black sea, this route is safer and more reliable than the baltic one, so the turkish flood gas pipeline passes only through two economic zones and through the territorial waters of two countries. well russia respectively, and turkey yes, and the depth of the sea there is much greater than on the baltic highway. meanwhile, the turkish project has an unexpected competitor , meanwhile poland, a country that also has no gas reserves, has long been trying to pull the gas blanket over itself , the country's authorities, pursuing an ultra russophobic policy , are pursuing the goal of tearing the countries of central europe and all of europe from russian energy carriers

strange accidental explosions on gas pipelines nord stream coincided with the start of gas pumping through the baltic pipe pipeline let me remind you that it is laid from norway to poland and passes through the building in transit. the volume of pumping is 62 million cubic meters. this is about 10 billion cubic meters per day per year. the poles have repeatedly stated that with the help of this gas pipeline they will replace russian gas, while warsaw is going not only to meet its own needs, but also to sell the surplus. true, so far it works only at a quarter of its capacity due to a lack of free gas. in norway this project has a long history, originally it is about a future gas pipeline they started talking back in 2001, but 20 years ago the project was considered unprofitable from an economic point of view and the project was curtailed, but in warsaw they now hope to increase pumping through the baltic a pipe and subsequently

become a little more than a few new hubs in eastern europe . the company plans to use 80% of the gas pipeline's capacity and supply six and a half billion cubic meters of gas from norway, but in 2024 to increase pumping by another billion cubic meters. and while it will be the only company using the gas pipeline, the question is, what about any energy packages that the european authorities accepted, according to which, let me remind you, but there cannot be a single supplier through the gas pipeline. well, this is a rhetorical question, despite the fact that the maximum capacity of the baltic pipe is six times lower than the nord stream, one cannot fail to notice that warsaw prepared for the energy crisis better than other eu countries before the buyers of norwegian gas in lagermania. and poland is a new promising client of the donkey, while being a

scandinavian country. uh, no new volumes extracts. in addition, the source of the baltic pipe, not a field, but the main pipelines europipe, 2, through which gas has been supplied for a long time, but the germans, in this way, warsaw begins to take what was originally intended. back and so, poland is a competitor to turkey or some other issues. uh, she decides. we will discuss this with a member of the scientific council of the russian academy of sciences for system research in the energy industry, advisor to the general director of gazprom export andrey konoplyanik andrey alexandrovich hello what are our neighbors, poland they want to become a hub instead of germany, or they walk big. do you know, uh, the question has been posed? absolutely correct. only i would clarify whether poland wants it or some

other countries want it together with poland. well, i thought a little about how to formulate my answer. and i have six theses. yes, yes, curious, and here, because it is important to still see the underwater part of the iceberg. and now, it seems to me, it is much deeper than just the baltic pite. the baltic is understandable. there's a capacity here of billions of cubic meters. this is approximately equivalent to our pipeline gas deliveries to poland, which are more often refused, so this is, as it were, a substitute for the domestic market. but you are really right that the united states of america wants to become more and wants to do this together with poland, or they want to make it a big hub for eastern europe, and it’s very interesting here. there are such bifurcations, about which i would like to talk now, that means the third from the first. i contend that more is one of the tools of struggle and united states of america and above. the composition of the european union of great britain against a united continental europe, that is, the question here is not only in gas and not so much in gas,

because the states are fighting against the strengthening of the european union, eliminating the strong european union as a competitor in the world economy of their competitor, because the euro is strong. yes, this is a threat to the dollar, well, for one pound yes, new york, london, as the two main world financial centers. yes, in conditions when the initialization of the world economy occur at an accelerating pace, so the actual expansion of the euro area from one year. yes, when the euro appeared it was a partial de-donation of the world economy. this is a threat to the state, so you need to take competitors. and by the way, this partly from my point of view answers the question. why the united states of america immediately with the arrival of biden? on the very first day of his presidency , they returned to the paris agreement and began a race to the fore in the development of green energy with the eu. one of the tasks, as i see it, is to prevent the european union has moved forward by developing euro-based green energy markets. and such a goal to develop hydrogen markets, in particular on the basis of the euro, was explicitly formulated, for example, hydrogen for russia yes, therefore eliminate competitors

european hydrogen strategies. yes, the european hydrogen strategy in this you mean, the european people of russia, of course, are not ours, right? lo comotive means also sauna to the family there is such an understanding, because i have been talking about this for a very long time that the economic rise of germany is a with it, the economic rise of europe took place on the basis of abundant, cheap, reliable, uninterrupted supplies of soviet or russian energy resources. and starting, er, 50 years ago, with the deal of the soviet union, germany, gazprom in the eighties, and then jointly overcoming reagan 's chances in the early eighties. together i mean the soviet west germany of the west european, because there from the side of western europe were the federal republic of germany and france italy when religious sanctions were introduced against the gas pipeline of the soviet european union, for example, and this joint work, yes, joint soviet-west european cooperation created a long-term mutually beneficial

interdependence of the soviet union and russia on the one hand and the european union on the other, based on the export of cheap soviet and then russian energy resources, and this created a competitive advantage for the eu countries in the world market for finished products . and it is now even acknowledged. here, from my point of view, it is completely incompetent, but in this case it is absolutely correct that the leadership of germany says there and scholtsy. khabib tam and so on. and i will explain when we say cheap? yes, when i say cheap, it's not because you were sold at a loss, but because the consumer in the european union, the so-called cut-off price, yes, that is , production and delivery with an acceptable profit for the supplier. that is, for us, in relation to russian pipeline gas, initially, and after the commissioning of nord stream 1 and the proposed commissioning of nord stream-2 and the transfer of our main export flows of russian pipeline gas. it would be the lowest compared to alternative supplies. that is, it was the lowest and would become even lower. well, perhaps only with the

exception of, so to speak, tatar residential natural gas. yes, because it can generally be sold at negative prices. yes, the third point means that if there is such a locomotive and the united states is struggling with e, it means that e competitive positions in the world economy from the criminal europe means that this locomotive must be undermined leader. so, to weaken germany as much as possible, and for this it is necessary to tear it away from russia, then the economic power of the european union will crumble, but it must be done by proxy. in general, without hiding, they say that the americans themselves. well, i 'll say this as a specialist, yes, well, people who know their stuff. there, i most often cite the example of george friedman, yes, the so-called stratfor company, which knowledgeable people call shady shit. yes poland for this. by the way, how the tool fits perfectly, firstly, virtual fears are phantom pain in connection with russia from germany, this is necessary in order to break this link between russia and germany, plus pragmatic emphasis on pragmatic polish interests in the united states, it was necessary to

interest poland in this way yes, and they offered her to replace germany's role in europe's energy supply, after all more all the time promotedtension. yes, that germany is increasing gas supplies from russia through nord stream one, and then through nord stream 2, and these supplies come to the territory. that germany thereby turns into a gas hub or a distribution center of europe and thus becomes an instrument in the hands of moscow, that is, playing together with moscow, the request of an interestingly united europe is poor, and she played this card for a long time, and so to speak plays it constantly. at the same time, she herself wanted to become the main transit corridor. uh, that means, uh, russian gas for germany. that is, she has these inventory ambitions somewhere. she wanted to play the role herself, in which she accuses germany today, but i let me remind you that when the idea of ​​nord stream 2 was discussed now, maybe few people remember, or maybe few people know, but at that time poland and the baltic countries, all three were promoting their alternative proposal. the so-called amber project it was a transit gas pipeline,

more precisely, it should be a transit gas pipeline. by land through a third of the baltic countries. to germany, uh, and through the big one. naturally, a new bypass of ukraine, we then preferred the option without transit at all. yes , andrey alexandrovich, let's clarify this again russian gas associated project yes, russian, yes, that is, instead of nord stream 1, we were offered to transport our gas from the area, respectively, the gulf of finland through the territory of the baltic states, through the territory of poland only by land. to germany, that is, the starting point is the same, we are the area of ​​​​st. estonia latvia lithuania further entrance, respectively, to poland further, accordingly, it enters germany, that is, they themselves wanted to become a transit party on the path of our deliveries, that is, it plays the role that they accuse germany of today because they wanted to regulate these russian deliveries themselves and , of course, receive transit payments. that

is, they offered themselves as an alternative. e ukraine this is in addition to the fact that europe's yamal pipeline which started in the nineties was built when we were considering expanding additional supplies. that is, they offered it as an alternative nord stream, 1, but we sometimes preferred the option. completely without transit yes, because in addition to the sad ukrainian experience. we already had a sad baltic experience there, there by wildme sports. ventsvilis there in liepaja there, well, and so on and so forth. therefore, my fourth thesis to the united states suggested that poland stand up, or let's put it differently, they decided to make poland yes in the northern distribution center for liquefied natural gas of the united states in eastern central europe in the south as such a center it is proposed to become bulgaria yes. now, too, it has already become a common place. but now, when in the seventeenth year they also spoke about putin medvedev at the same time there, well, with an interval of a month, they advanced that thesis , that thesis. well, they said, uh, so it's actually an attempt to push, uh, the united states of america into their more expensive lng against

our cheaper pipeline gas in europe. this explains the policy, respectively, of the united states of america to try to eliminate us, uh, from the energy supply. i'm lying. yes i ask forgiveness. we have 2 minutes left. you have two more points. it turns out that a minute on the way then in the fourteenth year, the us atlantic council is the think tank of the state department, came out with a report. where is he? the need to create a vertical infrastructure corridor in the east of the european union then, in the sixteenth year, the president of poland , the president of croatia, that is, the idea put forward. now there are 12 countries called the three seas initiative de facto - this is a reincarnation in the pilsun plan of the twenties of the last century to tear off russia from europe, and as part of this three seas initiative, such an infrastructure corridor is being created to link lng receiving terminals in the baltic in the aegean and in the north and south of the yeisk sea, there, and so on. yes, uh, vertical pipeline corridor from the north of the distributor center, this bundle of poland lithuania

slovakia is therefore making interconnectors now. lithuania poland it was introduced in may enter connector, respectively poland slovakia - this is very important it is completed in august, and it crashes into our transit corridor for russian gas in the region the slovak ukrainian border in the pushana area in order for the regenerated american lng brain of the north, through poland, to enter here and further along this one. otherwise, along our transit corridor already. and slovakia goes further through the czech republic, respectively, to germany, that is, so that the liquid for natural gas from the united states can enter europe from the east through poland and that's it. this is necessary in order to tear russia away from europe so that europe gets more expensive, and american lng - this leads to what goes for the industrialization of europe because productions are closed, and these productions are brought to the united states of america, this goal has been weakened, respectively, europe and i am finishing, probably, 30 seconds. i see the last sixth thesis that, by weakening the ties of russia to germany, it is into the hands of poland in its real policy to replace germany

in the role of a gas hub in central eastern europe, but there is more, so to speak, a deeper move. this is the same toolkit that the states used in their time. during the marshal's plan, when they helped, as if after the war restoration of europe and received, accordingly, a double harvest from this, therefore, the united states of america supplies its expensive, e. . and that’s why there is a double-stranding of europe, which, from my point of view, is de facto, well, the implementation or reincarnation of such a well-known, at least by a historian, plan, which was called the margenthau plan 1944 after the industrialization of germany, when churchill or roosevel in canada in 1944 , they agreed that in order to prevent the outbreak of a third world war, i must prevent it. yes, the industrialization of germany it was extremely interesting to ask, please, i interrupt you, because we are

running out of air time. i really hope that we will meet again on the air and discuss these very important topics, and she remembers that andrey konoplyanik was in touch with us, a member of the scientific council of the wound systematic research in the energy sector, advisor to the general director of gazprom export. the prices for osago osago in sberbank are unpleasantly surprised with a benefit of up to 60 percent. such a low rate has not yet been a loan in the alpha bank from four and a half percent. get money today alpha-bank is the best mobile bank. i bought new winter shoes for

my baby on avito. see how he goes. a large selection of new tenoten tires means not to get annoyed in any situation, not to raise your voice and be calm tenoten we are the masters of our lives. covered here management and created this forbid yourself to dream point bank for entrepreneurs and enterprises, native friend from childhood russian lotto time-tested reliability. open a free business account with alpha bank. and get money for any actions on the account. the movement of freight transport

on the crimean bridge is planned to be launched by saturday evening. about this marat khusnullin, trucks will not miss an important moment without inspection, the deputy prime minister also spoke about the timing of the restoration of the destroyed span. to date 250 people, 30 pieces of equipment, two floating cranes have already been mobilized. within two weeks, the number of people will be increased to 500 people as soon as the work appears, that is, the technology found, as well as the existing support pillars of the bridge, have been destroyed. now they are to be removed, cut, dismantled, and i can say that the first supports of the new bridge have already been

manufactured at factories and are already on their way to the crimean bridge. we believe that we have already completed the main work on the crimean bridge by the end of the year. well, the deputy prime minister also told how the removal of people begins from the kherson region. the decision was made in the government on the eve of the constant shelling of the region by the apu. today there are constant shelling of kherson. yes, it is not safe, so it was first suggested to children. this means that we have several thousand children already today in russia, who are resting in chimneys in children's camps. proposed today. this idea was addressed by the head of kherson to the government in order to help those who want to leave , so everyone who wants to today, we really have this opportunity. we give a day - this is about 500 people, so far, but we are dealing with these people . and who wants my organize departure.

for now, it means places of rest, somewhere in the base and intermediate places with the next. if they do not want to live and work that russia, we will represent it to them . russia to build a new ski resort in the polar urals a sports school, a hotel and a restaurant on the slopes will be able to ride more than 4,000 skiers at a time. work within the framework of the project has already begun, their cost is estimated at more than 13 billion rubles. and the experience of gazprombank within the framework of the mega player infrastructure project will make it possible to create a world-class technological resort in a unique place, while preserving nature in its original form. despite the fact that there are indeed

many similar projects, yamal is a pioneer. uh, in fact, he has now agreed and is implementing the first concession in a country of this magnitude precisely e resort type with ski infrastructure, and indeed these solutions are definitely becoming stereotyped. uh, we have, uh, in the consortium there are specialists from the hotel industry, there are ski experts. uh resorts and construction design. gazprombank always. e finances those projects that bring, including positive emotions for people. we are very pleased that, in partnership with key players, gazprombank is certainly a leading russian bank and very experienced. uh, members of the ends, catfish, experienced hotel chain. we, as a region, take over infrastructure commitments. these roads of the network are a very big impulse in

economic development, but what is important is new jobs for a decade ahead and the development of a fundamentally new e-sector of the economy of our region. ukraine runs the risk of being left without satellite communications billionaire elon musk refused to pay for work, starling for maintenance. he has already spent $ 80 million. the founder of uh, spacex has offered the pentagon to take over the costs. well, the war department are going to find alternatives . partners with details usa our own correspondent. denis davydov politicians are accustomed to zelensky’s green t-shirt wardrobe, spitting on the dress code rules, and at a meeting with the leadership of the world bank and the international monetary fund to the west, he rolls out a multi-billion dollar bill for the restoration and heating of ukraine, the amount of support this year should be at least $ 5 billion . t-shirt foreigner demands money for

his immediate economic needs. we also have a friend. who the hell are you? get lost our economy is degrading borders, in fact, no, and this guy lectures us and shows us a list of gifts for christmas. i want this and that. send a bike. hurry, seriously. happily, my friend, did not hesitate in requests and the commander of the whole zaluzhnoy in june. he sent a letter directly to businessman elon musk from the billionaire. the general hoped to get 8,000 starling terminals for satellite internet. then in the summer, the mask company suggested that ukrainians send a request to the pentagon. and in september , the producers of starlinks themselves wrote a letter to us department of defense. we are unable to further donate terminals to ukraine or fund existing terminals for an indefinite period. for a period of time,

not just correspondence fell into the hands of cnn journalists. and also reporting, judging by the documents. since spring, ukraine has received an excuse for 20,000 terminals. they work at maximum speed and kiev does not pay for them, not a penny. 85% of the expenses were covered by the us budgets of poland and other countries. the rest was paid for by the businessman himself, more than 100 million dollars ran up spacex does not ask for reimbursement of past expenses, but also can not endlessly fund the existing system and send thousands of new terminals to ukraine that use 100 times more data than a typical household. this is irrational ivan elon musk's spacex company claims that it is running out of money to ensure the operation of the most important group, satellites, on which ukrainian troops depend daily on the battlefield. this comes amid reports that musk recently spoke to vladimir putin about the war. this post

denies the mask was associated with the kremlin after last week he, the richest man on the planet, published his plan to resolve the crisis, for example, he proposed to recognize crimea as russian, and for ukraine to secure a non-aligned status for such proposals, ambassador melnyk sent an american out of the literary direction and today on twitter , one of the users recalled this, and the businessman even answered him starlink company ilona mask declares that he can no longer afford to provide free services to ukraine and asks pentagon pay for them. this happened a few days after the ambassador of ukraine andriy melnyk said the mask. we just follow his recommendations as soon as it became known about the refusal of the mask to pay for the ukrainian internet, his name appeared on the ukrainian website peacemaker, however, musk disappeared from this hit list 15 minutes after the publication. but in the states, it seems that he will not descend right now, information is emerging that the authorities are studying the behavior of a billionaire in a deal

to buy twitter. he then announced the acquisition, then paused. musk is under investigation, but not said. what is the exact focus of these investigations and what federal authorities are conducting them twitter, which in july sued the mask to force him to close the deal, said that the businessman's lawyers refused to hand over the documents that they were asked for by another of his own donald trump, he refuses to cooperate with the commission congress, which still once again follows the circumstances of the storming of the capitol, a year and a half ago at the next hearing showed that was going on in the building at the time of the attack by the speakers. the axes lead underground tunnels to a safe place while trump supporters break down the doors to the temple of democracy, she says in her heart that she will make the forty-fifth president of the united states. i hope he comes here. i'll hit him. yes, i'll go to jail, but almost all democrats will be happy on the commission, and

those few republicans who are all trump haters, therefore, unanimously vote to call the former president for questioning under oath. why did they wait until the very end before the last moments of its last meeting, because this committee suffered a complete collapse and was intended to serve only to further split our country, which, by the way, is already doing very badly in 3 weeks, the midterm congressional elections, after which the composition of the house of representatives will change, the democrats may lose control over it, and the majority will be from bird to trump republicans and then they will simply dissolve the commission investigating on january 6 as unnecessary, where not with davydov and anna lvova lead.

about the main events of this minute in our news release, partial mobilization in russia will be completed within two weeks. members of the security council will follow its course, vladimir putin said. answering questions from journalists in kazakhstan , the president did not rule out that, following the results of the investigation into the terrorist attack on the crimean bridge, moscow would refuse the grain deal. and i also said what will happen if nato sends its troops to ukraine about the most important statements by alexander khristenko , a significant part of the questions was addressed to vladimir putin, exactly.