in the sbermarket - this is a benefit in each order. products are cheaper than in the store. discounts up to 60 percent of purchases for bonuses from sber. thank you and that's it. this is with delivery from your favorite stores order profitably. we can help you find a job that will become part of your life search for you. he is a job, he always requires emotional strength. and here it is important for a person to support this situation. it seems to me that the profession is very important and the desire to be in demand in your search for a job a person needs a person. employment center russia's work is yours work our work the republics of the

cold war again gather 141 states, he in the general assembly united in order to make russia pay. this is our message to russia, an unambiguous message. no, lifted rockets ready. this decision is more about reaching parity to balance things out. what if the americans reveal this ahead of time, really? i didn’t know what a nuclear explosion was, the dog saw it, you have to show your teeth.

look who's fighting with us. we are waiting for help qualified not to run, run, but to get ready and come here again. earlier, the mobilization has already come to us and is already pouring into our ranks. unload your weapon one for all all for one, this is first of all helping each other. the question arises, we will go there already. i tell them guys. everything has its time. finish the

initial preparation further into the ranks of our children, our torment awaits the fate that we will draw for them now. the walls of the battle, then the america program will continue on air, our colleague valentin bogdanov took a long interview with the russian ambassador to the usa anatoly antonov, the country program, which is hard to understand hello 60 years of the cuban missile crisis, or as it is called in the united states of the cuban missile crisis, the world has never been

so close to a nuclear war, relations between the two superpowers are so tense . how to find a way out about this with the russian ambassador in washington and anatoly antonov, we talked at the very place where we could find a way out in october 1962, a unique in every sense excursion recaptured his house of the residence of the american presidents at a stone's throw from the embassy of the soviet union that got the building here is now the residence the russian ambassador, where he made an appointment for us. anatoly fedorovich dobrynin's office was located here, night meetings with american representatives were held here, just as she is not visible here in his apartment. it's somewhere, uh, on the third floor. e! the living room is where they drank tea. uh, coffee, who are they, they are the president's brother, uh, kennedy robert kennedy and also

anatoly fedorovich dobrynin uh, it is very important that in those years 60 years ago, but there was this trust channel, you know, uh, honestly, i a little bit even envy him, because he had such a channel he had to say, even his entrance to the state department. he, uh, even his elevator, uh, says that he could easily get into the white house. uh, alas, alas, alas, uh, i don't have such an opportunity, in order to instantly get through to the white house or the state department. and this is a top view from the roof of the residence. where the tv cameras did n’t go up to us at all, take a closer look, to the left of the russian tricolor, if you look in the same direction towards the lofavets of the white house square, you can see something on the asphalt yellow is in yard letters for the protest summer of 2020. right on mostovaya, they wrote the slogan black lives matter, black lives matter. yes, in the united states of the democrat biden era,

compared to the democrat era. kennedy, a lot of things have changed, but now the relationship with moscow is at zero again. uh these days. we are celebrating the sixtieth anniversary of the caribbean crisis, it is believed that during the days of the caribbean crisis, the so-called doomsday clock, as they are called uh, the time left before a nuclear war, it was minimal, that is, the world really stood on the brink of this war. there will be a third world war, there will be armageddon, you ask me a question not about my salary, only the russian president, vladimir vladimirovich putin, can answer such questions, but i will answer you firmly. at least what we do russian diplomats are what they do. uh, russian politicians. uh, they are doing everything to ensure that this does not happen, and we are committed to the position.

e, approved by our presidents, and not only the russian federation of russia, but also the nuclear five that a nuclear war cannot happen and there will be no winner in it. there will simply be nothing, there will be no one. and therefore, uh, i believe that everything must be done to ensure that this does not happen, and many compare the period e sixty years ago to today. uh, of course, according to biden, for example, compares, of course, it's hard to say uh is that situation really comparable to the current one? i think. moreover , i think that we must abandon this unnecessary empty crackling, which is so a lot in various publications and on various political science shows, when people speak who do not even understand what they are talking about, what it

is, how dangerous it is, how scary it is. but this is a nuclear tragedy that can break out. i think professionals should do this. and you pay attention. how careful is the russian president in calibrating every word he gives us as a guideline in order to work in this direction. you often in my comments i am very i follow them closely, especially recently you have noted that the united states is not the only one doing this. it does and the kremlin becomes de facto. this was not a party to the conflict during the caribbean crisis, we did not fight the united states with cuba at that time there was a failed operation in the bay of pigs. how to be here you

really think that the americans are at war with us you know, uh, i'm smiling at you because you provoke me into a discussion with you, i don't want to do this. what does it mean from the side conflict? and the fact that ships were lined up that blocked the passage of russian ships. is this not participation, this is unpreparation, a military case, when the american naval commanders were ready to breathe, uh, on buttons and missiles, russian ships would fly. wouldn't that be a war. and what is happening today? well, let's take a look together. uh, we argue whether the americans is natusty uh conflict. and what is it to be a conflict? this is what to send, you definitely need military units to ukraine and which would put their foreheads or face to face with russian units, the americans have been training ukrainian military personnel for a long time. about how to wage war or

the skill of nato soldiers, the americans supply very serious weapons, from which they hit russian cities, children, people, innocent citizens die. eh, that 's it, it's been going on for a long time. it's a very dangerous position - it's, uh, a very dangerous policy. exactly, that's why i kept saying, the old one saved the signal and the white house and the state department want to believe that they are watching what the russian diplomat is talking about the need to stop, where anatoly ivanovich is now the red line. let's decide on the red lines, for which our red lines are for a military clash between russia. for them. they crossed those red lines a long time ago. you know, well, so that someone does not explain about the nord stream blew up. you remember history. we know they blew it up. i don’t know in our country, today

, there are no proven facts of the participation of this or that state, but i am firmly convinced that behind this sabotage is no one person, not some grouping, but the state is a state that has technological, and capabilities that are specially trained, as i say people. here gazprom said today that there were videos shown in 2015, of a nato, underwater drone installed between a dead body stream. this was the first stream. so they have this video. they are now showing it to us, an infrastructure war has been declared. yes, the americans always spoke. vs to ensure that between the soviet union and europe between russia and europe there would be reliable and mutually beneficial relations. remember the soviet period, when there was a

famous pipe project in exchange for oil. and do you remember, how much was done in america to prevent this project from happening, remember that there was an ssp, uh, one. the same thing happened with respect to p2d here, finally, it was possible to drop the masks and hit our pipeline systems. among such facts of a strike on the russian federation, i, of course, i am also considering a blow to the crimean bridge. let's take a look at the train schedule of civilian trains. which would have to pass over the railway bridge. i have a feeling that at that time, the famous tavria belt that transports vacationers should pass, and so that you could imagine if this truck exploded, and if the train that carries the children of women, and even men, crashed

there is no difference, and they would have died after a vacation in the crimea or the moment when they went there, it's terrible. i believe that it is clear that this is an act of terrorism. may be our impact. i think that retribution, first of all, was strikes on key targets in ukraine today. i think that these actions will be determined by the supreme commander of the president of the russian federation. here, we hardly need to speculate with you or invent something there. today, cnn and fox news are in rare unity in one voice saying that attacks on ukraine's critical infrastructure were caused by a terrorist attack. ah, who produced ukrainian special services in relation to the crimean bridge. in your opinion, how should these somewhat divergent signals emanating from the

american side be perceived? i would call them contradictory, but it is very important for me what the white house says about this, what the state department says, and what it says, but i have to admit that there are no changes in the history of the white house guests at their desks. this is in the first place, of course, and the pentagon did not happen, as before, the only task is to put pressure on russia to introduce new sanctions to destroy russia, so i understand, uh, the desire of russian people to see at least something. good something positive some kind of light at the end of the tunnel, but uh, we here, uh, working in the embassy must assess the situation very objectively and soberly. i see and foresee that the pressure on us will continue, and i have to say that i think that relations will worsen, no matter how

you personally evaluate russian-american relations. has it ever been worse in history for us, and if so bad. should we improve these relations at all, or can we just bury them, but why do we need relationships with those? who? thinking about how we can decapitate russian-american relations in an extremely bad state in practice, if you ask me, and what is left of them today, i will tell you i will name the strategic offensive arms treaty that it operates, and i will tell you the interaction in space and i am very glad that roskosmos is able to cooperate, and the so-called deconflicting word is not incomprehensible russian, but we use it this communication between the russian and american military, and at the theater

military operations in syria, we are trying, but somewhere to find common ground on the non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. but it practically does not work, and yet. um, i firmly believe that russia the united states of america is doomed to thieves, at least on issues of strategic security strategic stability we are relentless. this, i repeat, being all permanent members of the security council, we are the largest nuclear powers and on what climate in relations between russia and the united states. america depends on the world depends on our future is such a question. so i've been working here for almost 10 years, and during all this time it happened to coincide. i observe a consistent degradation of russian american relations. i

have already seen the administration. obama i have seen the trump administration. now the biden administration is getting worse and worse with every administration. god would be with russian american relations. well , we'll survive, but such a period is the architecture of world international security with this question. especially arms control. you are an expert in this, and yet it has always been such an island of rationality of the mind that you understood that no matter what happens. that's what local climatic storms would not arise there. this is the course to follow. what is now left of the world security architecture? and what else can be saved? and is there any work in this direction? i will call it first of all the treaty, but the reduction of strategic offensive arms. we, uh, are in the legal field of this agreement. we him

we implement together with the americans. we have claims against them, because as they perform we believe that they perform it in bad faith, nevertheless. we continue to interact with them, but there is very little time left, that is, the course of this agreement, well, 3 years is almost a question for these 3 years. can we work out something? and in general, by the way, under these conditions, should we work out or not? is it necessary to restore the conversation on strategic stability or not ? this is a very serious question. you are right when they talked about the fact that even during the years of the cold war there was a conversation on this topic. walked between our two countries, but if the americans, we are clearly enrolled in the list not of rivals, but of enemies. and if they press us from all sides, they try to press , but they try not to overthrow russia, to split it up.