we are implementing mine together with the americans. we have claims against them, because as they perform we believe that they perform it in bad faith, nevertheless. we continue to interact with them, but there is very little time left before the expiration of this agreement, well, 3 years is almost a question for these 3 years. can we work out something? and in general, by the way, under these conditions, should we work out or not? is it necessary to restore the conversation on strategic stability or not ? this is a very serious question. you are right when they said that even during the years of the cold war, a conversation on this topic took place between our two countries. but if the americans, we are clearly enrolled in the list not of rivals, but of enemies. and, if they press us from all sides , they try to press, and not to destroy, they try to crush russia to put it. knee then the

question arises. and on what basis are we going to hold or restore uh a strategic stability talk, uh, we have the answers, if you would ask me just one only on an equal footing, if you ask what russia has russia's well-known position. uh, good. i think it ’s a good formula for the security equation when we suggested to the americans earlier to consider strategic systems, uh, that get territory to each other, and which we should discuss and, uh, at least think about confidence building measures, apparently, this is necessary start, while the americans believe that other problems need to be discussed. well, all americans think so. this is the administration. now, too, the trend is now, they say the word trend of the last two or three weeks has become very active elon musk man, probably not alien to us at least,

because he is one of those few people who still help us cooperate in practice. i was just driving, watching how the ship was launched with our anna kikina, by the way, telling us the offer to attend this was not confirmed. what do you mean, what did you want? yes, i would very much like to see, i would very much like to participate and talk. well, here you are, please, to the russian embassy. here picks up these signals, how do you explain them and trump is already talking about the need for negotiations and elon musk offers. e subscribers. uh, a survey where people could decide there in their attitude to how much territory. uh, where do people live, russian speakers in ukraine are free to determine their future, how do you explain this a little wider, i will answer your questions. you know

and we are offered negotiations, uh, official washington the first condition is to stop the special war operation the second is to withdraw all troops from the territory of ukraine read, including crimea lugansk donbass two zaporozhye kherson region and the third start thinking about how we will pay reparations. well, is it really possible to agree on something on this basis, in general, it is powerful even to voice such ideas, that is, they still speak to us from a position of strength, they try to speak to us through the lips. how do you feel this is just news. there for a few days. yes , the turkish initiative to hold negotiations with the participation of western countries with the participation of russia but without ukraine, ukraine is not mentioned there. how viable is this initiative and the view from washington the view from washington, for this, in order to make a correct analysis, you need to know the details of this proposal, what is supposed, but i want to

tell you one thing, that the idea that the future of prope is the future of the world needs to be discussed. 10-12 countries it is not a new idea, and in some and i would call them progressive circles of the united states of america that we should think about a new international order. i want to emphasize once again that everything cannot be reduced to ukraine, yes, we are not fighting from ukraine, we are fighting on ukrainian territory on this territory. she was chosen to solve the problem between the two civilizations, and in this respect she agrees with dugin. and the well-known political figures as a philosopher that two civilizations collided here and uh, the result of a conversation with us is only one and uh, everything depends on us. can we

withstand this pressure? will we be able to, uh, firmly stand on our feet, and most importantly, will we be able to restore our economy very quickly, uh, and get that economic military potential that will force them to speak with us on an equal footing. us we need a new yalta, depending on what we mean by a new yalta. i firmly believe that we need negotiations in which we must define the contours of the international order. well, for example, if in the field of military-political, for example, this is clear to me, but with regard to the economic problems that exist, and here are the big questions, by the way, the solution of guardianships. plus, it just goes in line with those thoughts that i spoke about, but about what is being considered here as a serious slap in the face of the administration, when a country that seems to be militarily dependent

on the united states of america allowed itself, i 'm talking about saudi arabia, allowed itself actions that are contrary to the interests of the united states of america and, uh, it was amazing to see when american politicians began to talk about saudi arabia together with russia restores high. prices here at gas stations. you come across here, uh, russophobia a lot. it is very sad that we are witnessing the desecration of our consulate general in new york. we see here with speeches vandal actions vandal actions our embassy's relations, and we are constantly on a daily basis instructing our diplomats to be extremely careful. you know, i want to take this opportunity to say a few words about the found diplomats. hey, great team. well, today, literally, we were going

to a meeting. i said that we are beaten here all the time. uh, there are fewer of us, we are being kicked out, various kinds of discriminatory measures are being taken against us, nevertheless, we have very wonderful, but a good team, which, as i want to believe, gives and does the right things to protect the national interests of our country, our diplomats did not stand aside from a special military operation. we, like in previous years, took off our hats. and now we are collecting funds in order to send them to the donbass when you see what is happening today in the donbass it is impossible to remain indifferent to this for many russian citizens of the embassy here our

russian embassy is the last hope and, probably, to a greater extent than everyone else , these are people who are in captivity due to various circumstances. someone completely unjust, like victor will be convicted and simply bypassing any norms, in general, not only legal, but also ethical, how the work is built here and, of course, we want to know everything. it’s worth waiting there, after all, it’s closer to find some good news since 2008, we recorded 58 cases when russians were captured. in fact, they staged a hunt for them in third countries. they were deported brought here and located in american prisons. the question of the exchange of prisoners is a very delicate sensitive issue, this issue is being dealt with by special departments of the russian federation and the united states of america. by the way, this problem is being discussed through the channels

that vladimir vladimirovich putin and joe biden identified back in geneva, so i would consider it necessary to distance myself from this conversation. having given the opportunity, our departments and the american department to calmly work professionally in this direction to deliver. the main thing is that our russians should be free. and how it will be done, what is suitable, what is not suitable. i think these are technical details. we will leave it to the court to decide our departments. let's just hope, but it's better to unequivocally dissuade me or confirm that there are still two parties in america, a party of peace, a party of war. or is it our absolutely speculative view of things. and those who really make the decision of the deep state here are the party of war, this is the party that will go to the end with russia, two parties the republican democratic will now have midterm congressional elections. we don’t

know and don’t want to say who will win, i can only say that there are a lot of problems in the united states of america that need to be solved even today by an ordinary citizen. they think that you will agree with me that they are more interested in what is in your pocket. how much money is in your pocket? what is the price of gasoline at gas stations? how much does bread cost? if, uh, work, is it paid, is inflation high, and i think that they are less interested in a ukraine another important thing is that between republicans and democrats. in my opinion. there is a consensus that russia is the adversary. and it is this negative attitude that we russian diplomats have to try to sharpen and change the attitude. and to

russia, you know, maybe we are now with you at a time when we need to think together with those people who exist, who think about the need for russian american relations. we need to think about how to open america for russia and open russia to the americans. he anatolyevich you told us about two games who is better? to win the answer is very simple. uh, repeatedly on him. we gave the answer that this is the business of the americans, who will not be elected, and these are their problems, how they will solve them. eh, my problems. what kind of foreign policy they will build, we will try to build pragmatic equal relations with any people who will be in the white house on the capitol or in the state department of the good.