what in order to reduce the nuclear potential of other nuclear state, except the united states to zero? but all the time the arguments were different. we have heard the iranian nuclear threat. so i said in my speech, we have always proceeded from the fact that there is no threat, and now not only we, the entire international community believes that there is no, no, the iranian nuclear problem. why create a missile defense system? stop it no, not only is it not stopped, on the contrary, new tests are being conducted, the teachings are being carried out no, the philosophy itself is not changing international security. if one side believes that it has created a missile umbrella over itself and can protect itself from a retaliatory or response to a counter strike. well then, her hands are untied to the use of any type of weapon. this is the violation of the strategic balance. we do not have a

preventive strike in our concept of using nuclear weapons. hmm, our concept is a response to a counter strike, yes in this situation. we seem to be waiting for someone to use nuclear weapons against us, they themselves do nothing, as it were. well yes, but then the aggressor, he still needs to know that retribution is inevitable, that he will be destroyed, and we are victims of aggression and we, as martyrs, will go to heaven, and they will simply die. because they, because they will not even repent in time, and you are one of the three who are responsible for the world as a whole. and what's not scary? no, but you know. we still have when , after university, the security agencies came to work, and then always in intelligence, uh, educate them accordingly. if you took up

some business for some work. need in advance to understand what it is connected with or you take it, and then you must act carefully, not recklessly, not irresponsibly, assessing all the risks you need to act. well, maybe you shouldn't think about it, but self-preservation in russia's position is limiting, yasnaya is understandable. if something else is not clear, then the answers to questions on thursday on the air of the russia 24 tv channel. we will look forward to it and based on this, the obvious question is, what awaits us next week? well, yes, we are waiting for a new meeting of the club. valdai and attentive people could notice that in putin's instructions on the creation of a new coordinating council say that mishustin's treasure must be submitted by october 25, and this is the day after tomorrow. thank you, pavel, on this i say goodbye to the audience, no, after a short pause, i

'll see you in the studio on sunday evening. let's translate from clerical, but understandable, everything is not so scary if there is an instruction.

every sunday i have to go out to broadcast. i think about how this week went and what it shows, but on the one hand, like broadcasts. i have a lot of time like this. what's not a vacation? not time off, even the theory of sick leave, seems to be meaningless on the 24th, we are all, well, in the same position we are all on the march. well , is there really any doubt for someone else, with whom we are fighting? does anyone still doubt something, but when an article is published in the new york times, which directly describes how the americans plan operations, moreover, those people who then pick up the phone and talk with our minister of defense? well, don’t we really understand that the entire military-industrial complex of the

country serves ukraine even now in the past parts. well, there our guys returned from captivity. they tell who took them prisoner people who speak polish and english. nato is fighting against us this war is the main goal that the destruction of russia is well chosen until the territory of ukraine well, let's understand that when they say that the west cannot allow russia to win no, they are talking about something else. the west craves the defeat of russia the west craves the destruction of russia and belarus , the dismemberment of humiliation orthodoxy until today, if there is no clear understanding in russia of what i am

facing, what is opposing us, if there is still laxity and theft, which should be punished in the most severe way, an attempt to silence the problems is an attempt. bleach those who cannot be separated. misunderstanding that all this is an existential war? if you like, we are moving into the category of people's war. this is not the category where you can drive into a draw, and let's agree with us, no one will agree. once they will feel if they feel, and suddenly they will feel our slack. they will drop everything they have, from tanks to planes. never mind. how many ukrainian men will remain alive, they fill these ranks, de facto military personnel of nato countries or mercenaries from those countries that, for some reason, have

not joined nato, dressed in ukrainian military uniforms, their task is obvious. and we see what is happening now on the border, when the de facto belgorod province is the front zone. and now on this issue is very simple. here is michal vladimirovich mishustin heads the coordinating council. so you need a bull, you need ammunition. if the capabilities of the military-industrial complex are insufficient, then it is necessary to reorient those enterprises that, relatively speaking, are nearby, then we must say allies. if we have all like-minded people, which we definitely have. so it is necessary to appeal to the people, if it’s not enough to talk with volunteers, now many people who once served are already at a decent age, they got up, but must be understood. we have declared a war of annihilation.

and they are ready to seek our defeat at any cost. in europe, he is trying to figure out how to finally steal the frozen russian assets. don't worry, they will steal. there is no need to have any illusions, the austrian caster hinted that this requires at least a decision of some court? well, what court? well, what are we talking about, and by what court all these sanctions were adopted, these are absolutely not judicial procedures. the west has already stopped even playing, that is, they figured out a leaf of democracy, like the classics wrote marxism or leninism has long flied off the need to support ukraine , these selfish interests have been added. the poles are already proposing to use russian money to stabilize european energy prices. the west raises the stakes nato military confrontation forms four new tactical groups on the eastern flank. this is about 30,000 people the united states

has already sent the screaming eagles commander of the paratrooper division to romania, who did not inadvertently say that he was ready to enter the territory of ukraine. although the white house has repeatedly dismissed such plans growing out of the tree around the nuclear threat. as a nato exercise, the head of the us central command defiantly inspected one of the american nuclear submarines to show russia and iran the combat readiness of washington, while they still accuse us of intimidating the world with nuclear weapons and continue to come up with answers, while delivering, but an absolutely finished drug addict. i just want to show you a series of videos, but see how you can assess the state of this cretin. vlada wanted early hissed something with a snake tongue, true, some

believe that this is polish. but here's how you got so badly hurt. but, for example, what this same cretin says about how a world war should be unleashed, which will end in absolutely armageddon. we are now sitting and hearing constant calls that russia should take the blow at the center of decision-making to the center. make a decision which world should respond no matter ukraine is a nato country or not, this is happening today in europe no one is allowed, just blackmail, like a terrorist, just a lively santa, i repeat it sounds that there will be a blow to the center to make a decision, then there will be a blow where you are. who

is who this task is to kill people, so i will make that in a second, regardless of the result of your strike, there will be a blow to the decision you have in your state. here you can see how directly a person is afraid, while he switched to personal insults. he still has bad memory. apparently, citizen zelensky does not remember what he promised. hear what he has to say about our president although on the other hand. it seems to me that he does not mean our president. we will forever stop the opportunity to speak here very much as a president, because i believe that i violated not only

international law, i violated all the agreements that were before, starting with the normandy format, when they said that they did not want to talk about crimea, only there was some then the referendum of russia is going to go into a full-scale war, there is nothing to stop russia, and in the donbass this is the decision of the people, there are no russian troops. everything is blah blah blah. blah-blah-blah is the second of an old man who no longer remembers what he said, where he gave his word, where he didn’t give it, that’s what’s happening. what is the point of the president of an independent state speaking to me with a person who says something, and tomorrow changes his position.

well, let's show a really old man who forgets what he says, how he says it. god bless you and our troops. thank you for looking at the working features that are present here. hello void saluted in the void. no, nobody. understood, i searched. maybe there is someone here . yes? i’ll just run here, but there was, at least a prompter to read, but what a person says when the prompter stutters. re-elected, in my opinion, wrong. no, i already did 16 here in 4 years and i still have 20 more, or even more so that i will leave, right? but these are clowns.

and people are much more serious. that's what they say. for example, it is obvious that petrius voices the plans that the americans really have. the hypothesis that nato will use all sorts of social weapon on the battlefield. this does not necessarily mean a symmetrical nuclear strike. everything i do this provided one option that goes into a range of solutions that is undeniable. were developed for political washington in other capitals of close allies. it will not necessarily be a multinational led operation. the us is not about a country. nato is not applicable here, fifth article collective self-revolution. this may be in response to the russian leader's horrific decision to use nuclear weapon. the answer can be catastrophic

so you can easily imagine the invasion of collection troops, but in my opinion there should be one answer to this, that is, a nuclear strike on the capitals of nato countries and we must immediately warn that we perceive. this is clearly a worrying situation. it's time. already somehow realize the level of threats to the citizens of our country and understand that they are seriously fighting with us and it’s not ukraine at all, it’s there, well, it’s impossible to discuss this person. yes, as you can see, i understand, i understand that he nervous. i understand that he revels in his possibilities at the same time. he is in the center of attention, he does not care about all this such a naron, which is already chiming, to read poetry and everything

else. this is understandable, quite a serious question that i immediately have a simple one. and what 25 years ago was incomprehensible. it was not clear that they were destroying us that the socialist camp. this is the first security train, the soviet union itself the second security train and the third search for final destruction from the core. russian federation why did these people last so long, who needed them? why the same sacrifices were made on the altar of these illusions. and most importantly, what is irreversible, what is difficult to reverse, what is simply reversible, what is easily reversible. how to calculate it? yes? this is the main thing now, and will it turn out like this? so i suppose i fully support the words that the war should be popular, but do you know there is such an anecdote that they sent there? owl to consult, what to do with these bunnies? he says straight into hedgehogs to turn he speaks. and how how to turn? he says, you know , i'm a strategist, so this is not a question for me, it's a

particular tactical question. how to turn, so i also ask the owl. and how to create a people's war? since yes, first you need to create a people. yes a said that this is a disciplined such a tomized society and so on. secondly, it is necessary in some way to make sure that these people do not declare that there is an anti-people government. yes, and so on and so forth, a rather difficult question, how will it turn from bunnies into hedgehogs, when you when i was still doing mathematical modeling, it will be such a period, this is a candidate of science and so on. in particular, we were engaged in modeling the general shevchenko operation of others from the point of view of optimality in the mathematical sense of the operations being carried out. well. in particular, one general there, who looked at these models and compared them with modern situations, said, that's according to the current situation. this is where it is clearly necessary to conduct an experiment and somehow it became bad, because it was clear that the soviet period was it's about a nuclear hospital. so there is a

monstrous tragedy taking place, and this tragedy is a disgrace. it can only be justified by a very big tragedy, a huge war, and so on, but in a sense, even our responsibility to the fallen. yes, and also before the future lies in the fact that, in particular, this should be considered as an experiment, yes, which showed the following, our army did not order the war that is now being waged. i was at, as it were, high meetings, where for some reason one of them was like that. e, who became serdyukov chief adviser, and a former expert in cultural economics, argued that we would not have a big conventional war. we will either have a nuclear one right away, or these small ones in hot spots for this business. yes, as if serdyukov and others, as it were, they did what we needed to gradually begin to disappear, in general, the idea

that it is possible, a conventional big war with the interaction of branches, troops, corresponding regroupings. quite different, more and more began to turn, but not electives, but in private discipline of interaction between military branches, and everything else, all this began to appear on the agenda . yes, because it is, either nuclear, or a small traditional expeditionary force move, and so on. yes, some kind of pension building, when you have a border at all, it's good to go to south africa but , damn it, the british burovs suppress expression buildings here like this whole concept turned out to be deeply embedded in serdyukov for a long time. and all this creeped up to our border continuously. what , after all, we suddenly realized that the task of disintegration soviet union and everything else. i was born of the destruction of russia of the russian people. the union of the indestructible republics of the free rallied forever great russia . this is the russian core of all this of this system. it is , as it were, subject to destruction, it has no place in the

mega trends that exist, there is no such country on p-countries before their promising maps. i don't know 2040 is no more. that's it, it was a long time ago, so it was necessary to prepare for this. as you say, people's war. and i suddenly heard some strange things. well, how about for me how for of an ordinary citizen of russia, a slightly strange statement that we will send some alimens and all sorts of other categories to the war there. sorry, i'm not very inspired by what's going on in the last decades, but what happened in the 60s and 70s was very convincing. and who, uh, became the political elite of the future, those who did military service in the most. eh, like the manly parts. why was there such a huge competition? uh, the pre-war service was the cost of this, for example, to call, could not

to become the head of state in this situation. yes, but there were huge acquisitions. and the main thing was said. it's just that we are a country in which the army, and in this case, the people who serve in the military with their achievement is the elite. elite them. they move along the channel of vertical mobility, while other channels are closed. your child did not serve in special forces. come on, he's your kid. he's got a lot of money. excuse me. let him be in the restaurant business. well, let him not climb into politics. i don't want to say that this is how things happen. uh, wonderful and now we are still, well, she understood that in a sense she is a besieged camp, that around the little one, who loves her, yes, but at the same time she was under the patronage of the united states and everything else. here we found ourselves forty-150 million. in what situation we found ourselves for sure and forever forever the main enemy,

which must be destroyed by mishka in order to disappear. i'm not a man, but who is? mom, trouble will come, do not go behind the stone. no , it won't, i'll kill them all. and you play dashing, the one

who will protect her.

a small country still needs to be understood so far not 300 million and not 500 began a simple question this country. of course, one must live, but in order for her to live , what should she become? what she needs to become and how slowly, but accurately step by step to carry out this transformation. i think that it’s not with the help of

talking about the need to attract alimony to the army, it’s true, yes, you should go to the army in order to serve the people, then there will be some talk about nationality otherwise i declare responsible for the processes which are now running and not stopped. we can get a continuation of this conflict, so to speak, in a year. class army. the processes are negative here in this direction. well, there are wonderful things where training is bad. and there is a wonderful time spent here. and not only when putin arrives. here i have quite modest ones there. eh, guys called, so to speak. in the pskov division , training is going on remarkably well and there is no show in it, because why show it to the guys and not only there and in other places. in our country, divergent directions are flowing , the question arises only in this ideology. what

the ideology is that we will not disturb these philistine populations. now, let them still live in a social contract where it doesn't concern them. and this must be clearly said, and if we are talking about the fact that we are renegotiating the social contract that underlies the constitution, then let's renegotiate it with clarification of all basic issues. why understood too late? that the west is doing exactly what to do? why were they called partners first seriously, then ironically? why did nato enter yes, if it's all e satanism, what they wanted in satanism, or what? or later they discovered that it was satanism, and finally, i will explain right away. what is a practice. yes? yes, so no. uh, this is the weight of the porthos from the three musketeers. yes, it’s still a well-known work, when it is rushed with gold here. and on the other side there, uh, it's all canvas. so you can't

create structures in such conditions, how to practice, damn it. and we see, we conducted an experiment and we see that there is a lot of this practice of brism and now we need to quickly remove this situation, russia very lively country. this may be the last truly, alive, people, the white race. yes, maybe i'm not racist at all. i'm just saying, it's such a beauty that there are always a lot of great guys in it, there are not always good generals and officers. just a question. now arises in what will move upward from what speed. and that we will crawl down on the military rails, cross over, or jump over, which means we must jump over. and we crawl, because we are held by the past reality, it has not been canceled. for each the clause has not been canceled, the social contract, according to

which there moms and their dads should walk and eat in restaurants. and so to speak, some professionals should not plow. it turned out that this is a practice, yes, so we are now moving to a different format. so we must move to this format from the city with its head up on new grounds again as an ideology with a new concept. otherwise, i 'm afraid that a wonderful thesis, and the transformation of the war into a people's war will turn out to be the same rhetoric as much else. that is, we move on to practice and the enemy is absolutely merciless and there is no need to reduce his capabilities. do not expect that he will agree on nothing to agree on. who has not yet heard of nothing to agree on, after quite rightly annexed the territories there is nothing to agree on and all sorts of attempts to optimize again in the next front line, and everything else, these attempts will only end in trouble here. because this enemy

answers in one way i will tell you to the end. now, if they surrender, they will sign acts of unconditional surrender of something, then that's fucked up nuclear weapons, because this is such an enemy, he revels in weakness and finishes off the weak. this, by the way, is the philosophy of evolution. natural selection. if you are weak, they will finish you off, which means any manifestation of weakness, any retreat, anything under any rhetoric about optimizations, and so on, means only one thing, they will finish off faster , raise all the bastard here, and it is enough to connect what is happening there with that one with what going on here push push and push and everyone who says they drop. they are not fractional. here, and they will build up a pleasure in this industrial complex, and here they will kill ukrainians in an endless number, to whom this idiot

is talking some nonsense about independent ukraine. in this sense, our possibilities are one from now on and forever. forever become something bigger and more serious than the israel of the sixties. when you say the enemy, you just need to explain to people that this is by no means ukraine has its power, that the enemy that opposes us is much more systemic , firstly, what is happening in ukraine is an abomination cleaner than fascist and everyone who sits there knows it. they know this, secondly, the enemy of mankind - this was the word that both in the west and here was called the nazi regime. uh -huh thirdly, everything that is being done now by belittling russia and raising new trends will inevitably be the

rise of nazism, inevitably this is the law of communicating vessels. you lower it, it rises, and we we see in europe and everywhere we see these people and in the fourth. they pulled nazism to their side immediately after the forty-fifth year, and they pulled it over all the concepts that exist - these are essentially hitler's remakes, improved and so on, therefore, the enemy of humanity. now in many respects, including all those mentioned by the president. there, handel mender and everything else is an enemy of this full-fledged humanity and who declared that he is such a west here. this particular west that sentenced russia which pulled her into this collision. this is the classic concept of an average conventional war, in which you need to check what they can, they

do not want to immediately translate. it's in mode. uh, nuclear collision. yes, it is they who impose this concept on us all the time. clear. yes, what is being done. so we have a sufficient number of weapons, where the gentleman from zelensky is non-nuclear, in which all his bunkers will burn down. that, in my opinion , it is not necessary to use nuclear weapons in modern conditions, and for this idiot to understand conventional charges already have the same power as nuclear ones, so there is absolutely no need to do this. this needs to be done by others and it was necessary to do it for a long time. i am not a military man. that's why i called on the twenty-fourth of february to strike. decision-making goals and infrastructure. how many weapons are there and what can be done? you just need to understand that this is for your soul to the end, trouble has come, the russian people know how to collect in these conditions to do what they need to know how,

according to the server. andrey passed sergey ivanovich raised a lot of questions. and i'll try to translate this into two specific questions. just the number one rather offensive in our politics. not only in the internal, but also in the external. i see how, at the same time, a whole wave of propaganda of lies and everything else is rolling over us. i don't see our foreign policy bodies being mobilized to bring the truth to the rest of the world as well. i do not see. the policy remains cautious. she remains neutral. she remains an acquittor. she stays reactive this way longer it is forbidden. i read some indian sites that

have 100 million subscribers, they bring our position much better than our foreign sources. this must stop. you can not do it this way. and here, when we talk about offensiveness, we have to think about offensiveness in the economy. i absolutely agree that if this continues. this is the toothlessness of domestic politics. well, what we have been talking about here for a long time will happen. the russian people are the russian people, does it really exist? and i see how these pictures with a bear appear, which is very good. reflect the internal state of the people, that is why they appear, that is why they collect this audience, because they are the inner truth of the russian people and their attitude to everything that happens. and if suddenly this people does not

find a partner in power. he will find a partner in the strategic missile forces of the russian strategic troops , who certainly will not just sit around waiting for a nuclear strike on them, this is my personal opinion. therefore, i propose here in this audience to declare a moratorium of 223 fz on everything the duration of the special operation, in my opinion, it is necessary, if 23 has already been announced think, don’t think canceled don’t think, well, damn it, alexander mikhailovich will tell you to subordinate the central bank by the decision of the coordinating committee for the duration of the special operation is it right or is it one thing this is the first

question the second question a little different here, looking at what seemed to us from the very beginning. i'm left with very, very little doubt that our enemy is. will stop at nothing. sorry and first of all, you wrote a brilliant article back in in the fourteenth year almost exactly predicted everything that happened next. you just said about industry. i am again a side view. yes, as accepted. well listen, we have some of the best truck manufacturing in the world. well, objectively. yes, kamaz is all these things, what prevents them from being hung in a crow and sent to the front in the amount that is simply needed as much as possible. yes, these are not the armored vehicles that are there for the fifth tenth military experience. i see how many young guys are now remaking our there pickups turn them into armored

vehicles question. that is, now it must be done urgently. it will just be business. our metallurgy will be the business of our metallurgy will be the business of our automotive industry. that is, now everything that has at least some relation can be used for the front for the victory should be used for the front and for the victory, you never know , 300,000. yes, at least a few million guys said, guys, the fatherland is in danger. it decides the army there, how much is needed, but when they tell me we don't have enough strength. take some more people . a call, when they tell me we don’t have enough, something i have a different approach. well, let's gather those who can and tell the guys you have rock, they say, a week two weeks three four. what can be done in a week 2 3 4 convert find determine, that is, initially in a different way, you need to set the task one task to win. all that is

needed for the winners they are. oh, we are here now, we are there now. but let's see, the reverse should be an offensive aggressive tough approach, by the way, for those who understand. the battle of stalingrad was won and the city was held without any bridges that were around there, but it’s so the t-90 tanks sold a wonderful, so to speak, sale abroad. everything is fine. how many of these tanks do we have in the army and how many in the theater of operations? of course, it is possible and necessary to convert these same trucks? yes, i don't mind at all in every possible way for i ask. how many of the last tanks are now in the theater of operations. how much is the expression of the army? and how many of them were sold 1.100 to india 500 volgiers and so on more than 2.000. yes well wonderful in a normal situation, we trade in

weapons. now what kind of defense zatas. how many of these tanks will go to the troops along with armored trucks and everything else, well, absolutely the second question. well, a little disclaimer. as far as i remember, 15 years ago and 20 years ago there was the same feeling that there would not be a big conventional war everywhere. so, here it’s already necessary to say not with them and they don’t have, and i read their work. i was there. and i, and i was not there read. i 'll return to the question, which one way or another or got up already at full height or will stand up to full height , it is completely clear that our enemy will not stop at anything , than this becomes more and more obvious, because the way they behave, and they

will not listen, nor the allies who babble there something not worldly the public, which does not play any role at the moment. the question is how much ukraine is decommissioned land for them? and they all understand that ukraine and russia are one piece of territory - this is not their piece of territory. for them he is absolutely alien i think that they will stop at no provocation with flooding if they destroy the dam below with the provocation of a dirty nuclear bomb or with the provocation of some terrible chemical catastrophe. and i think there are many chemical enterprises in ukraine. and that's what we will do in this version. we

must answer must. this is our territory and will carry it all to us. and if we liberate this territory, we will rake it. and zelensky will run away, all this, of course, but the people have already been written off. here's how we should behave in this situation, what can we do now make them sneak in. somewhere in the cerebellum. i suggest. write down quite clearly and doctrinally how we will react to such things, so that they know perfectly well, so that the flaw in the decision is obvious and announced. i see no other option, because how do we react now if this happens, and again they feel weak. then there may already be

a direct nuclear strike on our troops. okay, i'll stop here. i raised the issue. i understood two questions, how they got frostbitten, you can wait for everything, whatever the teaching is done. as a matter of fact, and the strike on the russian troops works, they will shout. well, for some reason they are there, i think, screaming eagles in order not to run away. uh, inherent ducks are romanians so romanians. usually every war was fought on two sides. and if they started on one, they will end on the other. i think it will be the same. if we are strong. if and when interesting, alexander mikhailovich when we are here today, i would support andrey and say that, of course, the goal must be identified, and it is there

america and her allies are not the goal of this means and the mobilization of the consciousness of the economy. everything else is no longer empty words. for this , two events took place this week, there were many, but i would like to highlight two, which, among other things, have already been said by this statement of the central bank in the person of one of the deputies, who considered it possible to publicly declare that it is not possible to buy gold it is necessary, because our country may face an increase in the money supply to provide for the economy. and it will be a threat. including inflation, second. this is what the maintenance of certain sectors of the economy in uh, the mandate. the central bank is not included. you know, i consider this statement as positive. this suggests that, well, the liberals have nothing. they cannot hide their confusion, but some change their shoes in the air. this is exactly what i wanted to say, why i consider this as a

positive moment, worse if they are tempted to adapt, and they continue to persist in defending those ideas that are no longer just dangerous for the country, they are harmful if we are talking with you about that e events are the second actually. well, it cannot be said that it was necessary to reflect this, but it put an end to this kind of statement - the creation of a special correlation council. indeed , it is actually. uh, i agree here, or it means that the central bank should be subordinated to the government and the support of individual centers of the economy should be included in the central bank's mandate. but it's difficult, there are a lot of them. they are many different specialists. the good ones should be left at work in the constitution it is written that the function of the central the bank is maintaining the ruble exchange rate perfectly. let him do it, but in the law on the central. for some reason, this concept has expanded a little and led to the fact that it is written there that they can also engage in financial and economic policy. in fact, this can be done, only

the government needs to show that today, in the person of this committee, to transfer these functions and in fact make sure that the government has separate functions, including those related to the mission and filling our economy money supply is necessary for the implementation of not only military-technical tasks for solving military-technical tasks, but also for the development of the economy as a whole, because this is now an inseparable process; moreover, they are so interconnected that the fate of our country depends on it and talk about it. i would like to read to ask for anything i understand, there education is not enough. i'm just a soviet candidate. i'm just really misunderstanding something. 1941 is the great patriotic war. from the central bank of the soviet union at this moment, he generally rosbank existed to whom it obeyed, how it acted, it made alternative statements. no it's something you have there, and we have it we see it is

written here. here is written the independence of the central bank, by the way, only the capital is yes, that is, they said that gold. well , i'm just wondering about gold. this is me like this forty- first year i had the opportunity that here we are all together. but there is, you know, here we have a group of the nkvd comes in and all the possibilities end. just why does the state bank have a machine gun. possible with legs but without gold something is impossible. you understand, i don’t even want to spread it for a long time, but it’s very strange for me to hear from people who are busy with such an important matter - that’s all in principle, i’m again educating that well, at least it’s much better in plain language than buying currency already a friendly state. i keep urging that, well, we enter into a discussion. let them oppose, because in fact, i would like to see a group of people who are responsible for what is not only in an unfriendly currency. and

suddenly that people also have an inflationary process. i'm talking about the liquidity of this currency. well, someone is personally responsible for the fact that the resources accumulated in these currency units depreciate every day. why not gold? who can then? and you are a simple textbook. i'm telling you, there are classics of the actualization and prices of gold. listen, yes, but it is written there in these textbooks, although such a simple phrase that you can argue, but let's bet that the money is withdrawn from circulation, they turn treasures were written there 150 years ago, but they are pieces of paper any military conflicts, crises show that only gold can be the real treasure. well, this was written for those who, perhaps, did not plan to connect their lives with the economy. well, at least so that you do not understand what it is, and today he is trying to impose the yuan on us once again. well, what kind of yuan? we should have our own economy, and it’s amazing to me, because what i said longer, of ​​course, we should not demand economic literacy from the entire population, this is absurd, and therefore there is always room for certain

speculation. now the budget has been submitted to the state duma, and i can already hear certain restrictions today. we begin to plant an absolutely budget and we argue with the fact that, well, what is the mission of inflation. well listen, let's then already uh, divided. let the experts talk about what they should talk about, and once in the house it is the protection of the budget and protection, according to what the government offers. and where there are no specialists. he talks about anything, well, more calmly, so i repeat the mission, this is not , if we are talking about emissions, which fills the day with an economy of money supply out of control. well, of course, inflation. well, who will argue, but if we say, well, let's have a task before us. we have no other choice. all of us alone today oppose everyone. i have to move mikhalych glukov himself . said you were experimenting. we increased the money supply by almost 10% inflation, deflation went right without a blink of an eye and more than once four new giant territories were connected. what does it mean not to saturate the money supply,

but this greed must even be translated into simple language. well, let's stop limiting the development of the economy. well, how can we ensure that we talk about tanks? yes, anything, but this, these are costs, moreover, we actually receive unlimited powers today, but a moneyless mass without the ability to fill the economy live massy well, what kind of economy alexander mikhailovich i have a feeling that if this continues for some more time people will go to the central bank come on, stop it. we are now the center, by the way, is now excellent. he works there from the government. he understands that there is no need to look for enemies like that now, this will not lead to anything good. moreover, the people are different, they can walk in different ways, that is, the belief that the people will go in the right direction, everyone who wants to go picked up a machine gun and went to recruiting centers for training. this is what will be used the most now. if it was so easy to designate, of course not. no, the central bank is dealing with a serious matter

course support. i'm saying that we don't have time, we need to look for new mechanisms. today, we just need to ensure even the fulfillment of what is written in the constitution of the central bank - this is the maintenance of the ruble exchange rate, and the government. let him develop the economy, including through development institutions, which he has expensive drinks there, and so on, and provide. just the powers to expand don't say something to anyone opposing. they must solve their problems. well, in this case, we do not have time to build up and to discuss this issue, develop it, and the central bank of its functions, by the way, today they are clearly visible, because we see the stability of the ruble exchange rate, it can be assigned, which, in principle, we receive every day a forecast for the next week for the glory of god but the government. i am talking about something else, that a lot is being done in the government today, and all that remains for us is to cross this line of filling the money supply and not be afraid of it. why shouldn't you be afraid? yes, because the scale of industrial production in our country boundless and we have the enemy that we have.

he must see that our movement here is already irreversible. here, then he will not sit down at the negotiating table. he will think about how you will be then the conditions, perhaps some kind of reaction. i am not talking about the treaty, i am not talking about capitulation on our part in relation to it, because this can happen only when our economy allows it to develop. and only the military industry, but also to guarantee here the sovereignty that the president is talking about. strong does russia war and pestilence and rebellion and external storms push her in the spring? russia cannot be understood with the mind with a common yardstick. she has a special place in russia, you can

only believe. yes, they are russian characters , it seems, a simple person, but a severe misfortune will come in big or small and great strength, human beauty rises in him. the highest and sharpest characteristic feature of our people is a sense of justice and a thirst for it without a sense of their own country, especially a very special, dear and sweet one. in every little thing there is no real human character. this feeling is disinterested and fills us with great interest in everything. spiritual life in russia is more noble i am poisoned by russia i miss it

only russia and i think. let's translate from clerical to understandable, everything is not so scary if there is an instruction. i understand that it is a great temptation to constantly compare the situations of 41 years, but certainly the economy is a vivid

indicator that, well, in the soviet union sergeevich, the correct mobilization economy was created before the 1941st year. that's why there were no questions about either the state bank or why a in russia the task is to create a mobilization economy and, probably, most likely, society is already in conditions. not just a confrontation of war. and in order to answer many of the questions that were raised here, it is still necessary to make a retrospective, but not in distant history there and not in yeltsin’s, but in recent years, because russia, having entered into this confrontation with the west, went through several stages of parting with illusions of creating illusions and a certain evolution 2000 putin accepting this weak yeltsin russia, he also has leadership russia’s foreign policy

was about 4 years of illusion when they tried to build russia into the system of western values ​​​​the famous ljubljana meeting of bush putin which was withdrawn by the withdrawal of troops from kosovo and a lot of other things, counting on the response of partners in the classical diplomacy. they were already acting then, not according to any classical diplomacy. uh, i'm counting on concessions you know, it was somewhere at one such funny meeting, a german grant distributor for the belarusian position arrived, and the state sent me to look at this spectacle. there it was something like this. one of these ultra e, opposition writers began to say e ti can give food to the pan. oh, fuck fuck, uh, they will give out pennies by a writer. i write about chernobyl, but he shakes the chairs, he said so

nein. this is about the same behavior. here. we went like this, but our friend nikolai vasilyevich zlobin he outlined the policy of russia and the united states of the west during this period with the words really it was the policy of no, so no matter what you do, no interests of russia were taken into account. the turning point here was the revolution, the so -called growth of the third year in georgia, the expansion of nato with the exclusion of the baltic states in the fourth year and, of course, the maidan here. after that, it seems to me that in russia they began to part with these illusions and such a first offensive began. uh, putin’s geopolitical foreign policy, when an information platform began to be created, brushes, there and many other sources, and very, by the way, successfully that scared the west

. politics in the post-soviet space began to advance more, but even then they were laid down. and its shortcomings, because they did not rely on effective and popular ones. if if they weren't, official representatives, but they relied on the pleasant and understandable. here i am pleased and understandable to communicate with you. i will support you. and what do you really decide, what do you reflect it to do 12. well, plus some financial issues that overlap. well, in any case, russia went along of course, putin's munich speech was the peak of this path. it was very important that, no matter how we say, he became westernized. further, despite the five-day war. and by the way, this is the war in south ossetia - that was the answer. west here is the unwinding. i remember that the militarization of georgia proceeded at an enormous pace, up to a billion dollars a year. this exceeded the general military budgets of many countries. here is a beggar, georgia, a billion dollars a year for the military budget. it was also an answer to the munich speech, and then from the eighth year to the 14th, somewhere

there was such pressure. you have drains that built such projects of a liberal empire, you know, being built in the west, these are all theories j2, but he refused to offer china. but maybe we're the junior partner of an older friend. it all collapsed and uh run through, because in the middle of uh there was an attempted winter coup of the eleventh year. and this almost led to bolotnaya. we all remember very well that it was that, by the way, for 2 years, in fact, before the maidan , it was very important for russia. why did the maidan happen in many ways as a distraction? they quickly decided against this background that the maidan happened, but i say it many times, so they couldn’t act harshly destructively in the fourteenth year, of course, and solve the problems that we are solving now, because inside the country there was so much liberal conditional opposition that was ready to shoot back.

this is the period and for which the vilnius themselves of the thirteenth year thought about how the public humiliation of russia is not just the signing of an agreement on association of ukraine and as a public humiliation of russia, this was done on purpose the fourteenth year after the sochi olympics crimean spring unexpectedly. by the way, it must be said directly for the west, a period of gradual escalation begins, but with the possibility of an agreement, a classic cold war begins with tension in certain regions, belarus is opposed. even in ukraine, the south caucasus, we also add africa, which was the fourteenth year. so you think donbass was bombed. no, i just want to show you one the bastard is over, so that you understand how systemic liberals think. and what narrative is now being dispersed back and look at this someone bombed for 8 years, donbass well, who is this? maybe it's their

methodology. this is the same as a normal person. she is not a stupid person. this is normal man. it just can't. pronounce it because no one has bombed you there for 8 years. but this is the official position of kiev with this arrest officer, listen, we are 14 years old, this is a creature that i raised my grandmother on gray schemes due to the fact that he was protected at one time, not less corrupt men in uniform as he dragged his telephones past customs. this is a creature that forgiveness fell out of the tall kremlin offices, which later showed that he realized everything, recorded videos in support of the authorities, who were allowed to leave for england by buying his business. and now he brings it all. an abomination, a bastard, a traitor, a complete, worthless bastard would send you to donetsk in the fifteenth or sixteenth seventeenth year. that's just so you can see how

no one beat. donbass you bastard to the left take away the angels, the scum is over and you are going bald on business, it’s ugly. by the way, who is the author of the term liberal empire anatoly borisovich chubais who is this? yes, he, too, bam, that person left somewhere, who, in theory, should be tried for crazy debts, because how else can ruslan's debts be written off. he said we have a lot of money. we have good news. we have a lot of money. that is, here, where is this, where is this, where is this , despite the trump presidency and the escalation did not come in the twenty-second year. and with the election of biden in the twentieth year. there were no options from this couple to avoid a direct collision,

because all this, uh, the situation entered into its final decision, but correctly the final decision on the issue of russian statehood and the russian question. basically, as such. well, because vadim asks, he interrupts, because such important things. say that they are forcing from the fourteenth year nato has been preparing ukraine to war with russia as a nato outpost of the fourteenth year. no, there is no longer a direct court in the donbass, their variations of the line are being built. we are digging in their wife in the fourteenth year and special forces are being prepared specifically for a physical war with russia and at this moment we are talking about a different type of war, what sergey ivanovich spoke about in the fourteenth year, hiding behind the minsk agreements, they are pumping weapons, driving through the line of contact under half a million people nato instructors work with them i repeat, again the most powerful fortifications

were built from that time absolutely correctly. and you pretended that maybe, we are now talking about whether russia could have done otherwise in these years, generally undertook all methods of interaction with the west. what kind of concession agreements can be reached , for example, that several times in the sixth year in the tenth, and even in the twentieth, the west proposed in moscow to negotiate at the expense of belarus lukashenka . you kind of know, and we’ll tell you something no matter what comes about the russian leader and some of these lucky ones. they offered such options to themselves, and just for a second, think about it if they were sitting in belarus, the war would be completely different, it would have been in smolensk in the twentieth year. this is what we are talking about, so that it happens without an idea of ​​​​the development over the years over these almost a quarter of a century. this relationship situation is unimaginable. what is happening now is to work out some next steps, because

let's be realists quickly create a new ideology people's war will not happen quickly, because everything is without problems. hmm, without problems, ideology does not arise so quickly. still, remember, we discussed the people, as they say, andrei needs the people to hear the people. it’s not absolutely correct that people need to be heard, but it’s important that people hear different sections of society, it’s important that there is this trust, and some of these steps from the enumeration of these trusts, unfortunately, are often undermined, because there was no different class society in the forty- first year, and when there was a multi-class society in 1916, and these are two different scenarios, there was a mono society, if you like to say in the forty-first and there was a completely different society, then in the tenth years. that's what i'm talking about, you remember discussing that if the ideology is artificially created artificially. like some kind of poison that can undermine if you misunderstand

these moods of the people, but in any case, uh, from these negative conclusions. all the same, you need to quickly rebuild what is called on the march, and we talk a lot about this here, but there are two key theses, two key output. it seems to me that they are absolutely axioms now, if anyone doubts, they have been proven by life. the first russia can win this war only by carrying out a revolution in a revolutionary way in the good sense of the word, both international and domestic, because so many steps are declared. here one should not be directly afraid of this word - this is a revolution, that is, the rejection of the method of forms of existence of the former, which existed earlier, the second revolution in russia, you just need to understand this now, inevitably. there is only a conclusion. she's an option options, as our partners say, it will be either a

revolution from above or a revolution from below. interests of belarus to make it happen as you say, somehow easier. this is called a deep, evolutionary restructuring, from above the word rebuild is bad, deep. an evolutionary change from above, so to speak. this is some kind of chinese version of such a political language, the past twentieth congress, and storms and winds and great transformations from mountain to mountain. yes yes. here he stands, which opposes a dirty stream, if anything, we can understand the slavic one. yes, i have all our slavic style is good. well, if we started like this from china then. i'm just to let our audience understand what we're implying. let's show you. well, at least i

've never seen anything like it. aleksey, can i ask you to comment on who these people are and what is happening in the center? inspection of the ccp ryan from him just, on the left, we sit pin, on the right, the oath, vsmp, and now his red daddy, who made notes, is taken from him and they try to draw attention to what he does not understand at first. what is it about and now he will try to remove the leaflet from daddy. it's just that now the cut piece is shortened, and it is teamed with a sizenpin and he does not enter into a dialogue. that is, everything is fine. that’s all, yes, it’s either swinging about on the shoulder and he is taken away by two zafal. well, one of these references. yes, therefore, please pay attention to everyone uh, iron-faced, looking ahead like nothing happened. yes, this is how you should behave. uh, really, what happened with us is colossally interesting, because nothing

would happen in china, by chance it was completely symbolic absolutely and e khuzintalov symbolized the policy of 2003-2013 , a policy that, on the one hand, allowed china to develop double-digit. there were just two-digit numbers, 11 were sorted out and 12% to 12%, just gdp on the one hand, and on the other hand, corruption developed, it turned out to be a clan news, regional groupings have intensified. and in general, it was all very cool, so far. all this did not lead to consequences that collapsed on the shoulders. e sinzina, that is, much that is happening in china now, it has not today's origin, yesterday's, the day before yesterday. but when they began to take him out, he managed to say something, he told him something sidimpin. e can be seen, but entered into a dialogue with the only one. this is when they took him , and why did they suddenly approach him and begin to lead him out. so there's just a piece of why starts? he sits quietly at the table and writes something. here on a piece of paper in this red daddy. and

apparently. he was about to give this leaflet to one of the e, members of the poliro, who had eaten next to him. and that's when it comes to him. and who gave the command to bring him out, these are the most interesting ones. well, of course, there they are sitting next to each other, that is, a collective decision. i think uh no. everything, it was thought out in advance from uh, the next step was to draw up lists for the new composition of the permanent committee, the politburo and there was such a danger that he would speak out and, in fact, he wrote something, as if his new main proposal and it was very interesting that the oath of the snp who was sitting next to him. here in the frame. it didn't come in. he takes me a red daddy and hand it over to the two people who take him away and, uh, even though he tried to pull this piece of paper out of the folder to eat. well, it is not known, but on health it didn’t allow a and it was done, everything was in public. come on, biden's age. uh. yes, but in general he really

sick. it's true, it's not uh a figure of speech and uh, i think there was some drama in that situation. everyone is talking about him being arrested. i would not like to arrest alexander be. quietly it is done differently. i'll remind you when the gang of four was arrested. remember this story was at 7:00 , a group of four. they just uh it was october 4th, at least to say, as i remember now, until october 4th they were invited to a meeting in the entire chinese people's congress. they came here to the hall. they're right through the guards. well, those who cut off, the whole crowd they are told, you know, in such and such, pass now there water for us. well, new clothes and under white hands and quietly arrested them. that is, it has been worked out. here the question is different. it seems to me that what we have just seen is not important, what was e behind the scenes, what is important is that the era in china has symbolically ended

. uh, just recently today i was talking to a major chinese figure, and he he says to me, listen, you know that there is in china so uh in the usa there is such a concept as global harvards, global management. oh how can this be global control? that's what they control us, or what? we don't have anything. i say, well , you see, this is such a political concept. it exists as a concept. there is liberalism. eh, in control. he says, no, no, you understand, but we are not in this administration, someone wants to control us and someone wants to control you , but uh, look, and here it is very important moment. look how much we have learned from russia since february. that's all that's happening in china right now. i think that a lot of what happened at our congress is, among other things, not revealed and not

voiced, but, nevertheless, the reaction to what is happening in russia, including, again, yes, what sergey leontyevich spoke about many colleagues. eh that the country was psychologically not ready for a tough clash? and everything that denpin spoke with, and all the materials of the congress, they are filled with two words. everything else is a trifle. this is development, and here comes the block the concepts of rejuvenation of new cadres and the second national security. sidimping for the first time here or comparability with the 19th congress, as he spoke with the previous ones, for the first time he begins to say harshly that china is in the face of danger before it was dangerous internally they were talking about corruption. it has always been a conversation. now that there will be winds of a storm of danger, and that is, china recognizes that the world has changed very drastically and a new reaction is needed. where did the concept come from? well, in the army, after all , and also, in general, there was an army reform, and that’s all was calculated it would seem, but it turns out that the problem is not only in technology, not only in the

volume of armaments, the problems of the spirit of people who will one day manage this equipment. i think they just saw how nato is fighting under the guise of ukraine and understood something the same with taiwan, they will not fight taiwan at all. but this is still absolutely correct one question, because they perfectly understand that taiwan is the funnel in which all of asia should collapse. and why are they here it would seem why? well so there is a concept that taiwan is a territory. china why it was necessary to bring the boost in the party . i know for sure, because i believe that the telegram channel is absolutely. thank you so much. oh, well, because now this party task. so to every party member, because now the army reform and er, the return of taiwan is the duty of every party official. this means that there will be discussions in all places, from nesting organizations to higher ones, so that people understand, because the situation is very ambiguous with taiwan on the one hand.

this is almost an independent territory, but on the other hand, in fact, seeding, he says - these are our compatriots. and someone will not even have a question that we are attacking our already province and our compatriots. and people. it is necessary to explain otherwise it will turn out the same situation as in russia when everything is right, only many do not understand this and chinese propaganda after all, we believe that it is brilliant, it is not quite brilliant. i thought about how to become chinese. continue, please, and realized that i do not own. so good chinese like german. so i continue. yes. uh, chinese propaganda and chinese political people. he is far from brilliant, because for a long time, uh, the chinese. eh, inside they reassured me that everything was fine, that everything was under control. in china , not everything turned out to be under the control of china and uh, including, for example, the taiwan problem is a very

serious problem for the internal chinese society. and one moment. uh, the fall of the economy inside china is not a collapse, but still the slowdown is underway and it was necessary to explain, what happens and here for the first time, finally. uh, china started its reality in a completely different way. look at all past years. chief should what china has been open reform. that is, we are reforming, we are open to the world. welcome, but this time it was necessary to say that they want to support their own forces literally, it was not said so, but they began to say the national economy excluded the national e, electronic resources new it-technologies. they learn from us, that is, we have been blown up by a certain mine and now the chinese are looking where these mines are laid out against them, that is, they have looked. what sanctions are being imposed against us and understood what awaits them. the same. i think they also looked at internal russia at internal russian mistakes. including in ideology, after all, in china, this problem may be

at the beginning more than in our country and, uh, there are a million tens of millions of chinese youth. than who work as bloggers from, as we know, they earn millions there. uh dollars, it's fine just a matter of what they are psychologically divorced from educational reality and the chinese a year ago, began to reform it, who now we have basically, roughly speaking, broke down and ran young guys who just lived their own reality, and whom we did not educate. that's what they said that we need a revolution. everyone to the fronts, after all, the whale talked about the same thing. well, let's face it, but we have a huge generational gap in our society. so he's here, well, of course, but we can see who studied at the soviet school. and who studied later than the guys now, who basically pulls out everything on himself the hardships of the war, well, these are people who still found the soviet school. by the way, in this regard, i really liked the proposal that was made by sergei vladimirovichi, that the heroes of russia to

say, this was my teacher to him automatically. let's honored teacher of russia for the education of the hero. and you know that there is a similar thing in china, in my opinion, even in indonesia that is, when a person achieves high great heights in a teacher and in science by his teachers, in the teachers of his school. also highlight some premiums. it's right because we need to support it. we have the same thing, in my opinion. now one of the global problems. we have the whole structure that we have not worked out in recent years, but it did not work, a critical situation, what kind of activity was the academy of sciences working on? i'm just an invention of scientists who are helping now. uh, the universities worked, well, they didn't work, because they were stuck between that's it, there's a scheme and this scheme, and going back to china, china understands very well what the main problem is. and that's how he evaluates, what is happening with russia is not a blow to russia, this is an indirect blow to china, because china

extrapolates everything to itself. only china has very serious real leverage and today to oppose the usa in terms of e-it technology of artificial intelligence, that is, modern technologies, but china psychologically cannot restart, and sitimpin, apparently, wants to restart, so such an update as they have is called a non-politberu, but a standing commission. there's just a crazy update happened crazy update. at the same time, unexpected, but for not so for us, for external observers, the chinese probably understand well, but look here, if you don’t count by last name, that’s who left the people who were behind hmm smooth regulation of relations by the us west what should we continue the dialogue? right now, apparently. eh, there are convictions that, yes, the dialogue should continue. only it will end in the same way as the dialogue with russia ended. uh, china it thought the world. positive in relation to china

and we, the world, it turns out, may very well be cruel everything that was needed was pulled out of china, and now it is being blocked, that is, dentin said that the world depends on two countries from china and did not remember the united states for russia. well, that is, there are two rational explanations and the first is that, of course, china considers itself as an alternative player, but at the same time, china e does not talk about a bipolar world, but the second point. and we ourselves are good at explaining our role to china. where does china get the vision of chinese bloggers from now, by the way, many are very pro-russian in this case. they are trying for us do our job. well, it's coming back. maybe you said, andrei yes, of course, and not only in china and indonesia, the same story in india, the same story. i mean, uh, so we put it on the plane. for some reason, from the west, we all the time tried to explain our position, and from the east we explain where we are sitting, although the western

study of the world, just divided us much more, the east of latin america supports from the south, but, because they understand that everything. maybe the list is transferred to them and after all, all the same here, the main thing that is still being discussed is no prefixes in the polish. e communist party of china will there still be an armed military operation against taiwan, because then all this will bring down the entire configuration of asia simply from beginning to end, i would like and he just has fun at both ends, yes, even about three if desired. well, just let it be so, but it burns everything, that is, such an approach. oh well, then grief will turn out, but that's all, because we don't know how funny guys from north korea will come who can amuse everyone in general. eh, how they can drive as the chinese big brother says, and they will drive. independently independently exactly matches the instructions of chinese friends

korean rocket will fly exactly with the chinese instructions. yes, that is, they will stop playing. here will be the sea. yes, and we don't give flight a big question, uh, missiles deployed. e on the territory of korea and japan in which direction will they not fly? uh, that is, it will be, of course, the situation is not the best among them; worse than now in europe, yes, it is very different from europe. well, and accordingly there will be a war on two fronts.

used to watching videos stopped working , install, open, watch russian channels, and all movie series and cartoons, educational programs and documentaries for free without registration, watch in the application or on the website. roots will take

my gifts. if i don't come for him, he will come for me. i promise the flame belongs to me woman.

i understand why the chinese set such a task for taiwan, they studied. we totally agree, if not give, surrender does not show force against china everything else will be organized instantly in 5 years. asia already now that's for sure, because it explains, very aukus already. well, here, only he has not yet been mobilized. you know, that explains the question you've been asking yourself. why did it all come together so somehow softly, that is, nothing happened to you, but because there was probably a serious group in the leadership of china that the guys are not the time to do this now. but because they heard from her at least a word about the bite, but there will be johnson. this idea dragged vasya apart from ukraine. theory, maybe she hadn't learned the word yet, i

think yes, and it was difficult. she is such a girl, after all, the salad overpowered her, but she didn’t fit in, you put it out, which she put. here's just summarizing. it seems to me that now we will see a completely different china in terms of ideology once military policy two and the rigidity of our decisions three. this soft ended. it is interesting that since america is with us it is important to observe, what happens in america when leaving, that is, that's why, for example, it seems to me very important. yes, you can not give ukraine at least until the eighth of november no victories, not even close. because it is clear that the americans will now push with all their might so that until november 8, before the previous elections, there is something that can be said. well, you see, our investments are justified, and this is not only a monetary investment, but when it turns out that austin is miles in a straight line, they were engaged in planning operations themselves . laid there is nothing to say. just the same artificial overthinking

the character is a pr project, like the same zelensky, but it is important to look, what is happening in america, they want 50 billion. yes, now accept, how, at least with the help of ukraine? well, you understand that they can lose the midterm elections. well, if we, of course, do not make mistakes and do not play into their hands, which would be great in my opinion. big miss, i 'll say it so politely. let's look at a man who is donald trump, who, by the way, very rightly says that if he were, then the war might not have happened, because he is good understood putin. i think he would have heard putin's concerns, given his extremely negative relations, as zelensky, since the ukraine project, let's listen to trump. now we have a war in ukraine which may last for hundreds of thousands of people, it would never have happened even in a million years. stay i am the president, besides the price of oil. it would be

so low that they would not be able to finance the war. although it wouldn't be required. putin would never go for it. i know him well, the elections were rigged. and now our the country is destroyed twice. i won twice for the second time, i did much better than in 2020, i received several million votes more than 16 and in the same way received more votes than any action of the president in the entire history of our country. now that our country is once again a successful safe great i will probably have to do it again. but this is actually very serious. look now they are gathering national traitors in poland, obviously. they

want to create this type of parliament, well, as usual america does it. as it was not in due time with iran, there is such a representative body abroad, which is in exile, which will be given the authority to recognize it to talk with it. they will choose there. and why did she tell me that we do not consider this healthy person to be the illegal president of the united states? and we, for example, still thought just now, we looked at trump, we consider the law to be the president of the united states, for example, trump, well, if americans want to talk with fugitives, bastards why don't we talk to a person, for whom the vast majority of americans voted, as they themselves believe? a bold assumption for two reasons. the first of which is that we always think that our yes is secondary to them. this one, we

can scold them like an offended wife and even more harshly than the ever-hooligan gan everything. we can only, we cannot get rid of this addiction. i can yes free us from this addiction and the second reason is that they will immediately say that trump is an agent of russia exactly. well, they say it so well too that they will say that the first reason is the main one. oh, you know, and trump is also an agent of russia, because we have a principle. and by the way, schultz is also an agent of russia. we can not interfere like that, because we have principles. there is no interference, but internal affairs in relation to ourselves and to others, therefore, maybe, maybe, but for now they are these principles. if you put them forward, so to speak, by the way, perhaps, it is precisely this that attracts her to us because we have them. and they have them

no, who is attracted to us by the strange south, east, and so on. yes, that's right, because it's different to buy differently. we can’t do it anymore, alas, it’s being done, the united states can’t really scare mine either, it can also do it, the united states, which can drive anyone at its general assembly, there are 144 countries, but this, unfortunately, no matter how it is, unfortunately or not unfortunately, but in any case, we can not do this. but on the other hand, we constantly emphasize our fairly firm position. here. the question, which, by the way, in which we are reproached for violating the un charter and the like, so this is one side of the question, the second side of the question is that well, we have principles, i'm sorry, but it starts principles led to that only five countries voted for us on the resolution you, because we have nothing to unite unite. and maybe let's

be happy we don't now have an explainer activity. this one is different. if we didn't have them, we wouldn't have these five states. with another sides. i just wanted to say support. i'm very interested. here is such a position, of course, something, well, i understand marty, he will become the head of state. yes, and they will confirm his status, as heads of state, i mean the empire. but then it will be necessary to carry out the task to carry out the task. and if he will not complete the task, then the master plend fight with uh with s. china on the part of the united states consists in gradually ousting them from the e-e countries of the third world there on the fourth, fifth, tenth, that is, from africa latin america from asia but these take off the chinese business gradually and actively carry out modernization, because what the siv report said that they are accelerating the modernization of their

armed forces by 3 years before the congress believed that they ended in the thirties. he said he would finish 27th. the americans also accelerated the b-21, which was supposed to take off in the middle. last year's track should seem to be, as they promise. at least the company that it will rise in december of this year. this means that nowhere by the age of 25, but not by the twenty-seventh year, they will have squadrons and b-21 ryder a will be already 25 years old. that is, so that he will rise. this means that he will be armed with completely different things. possibly the first flight ever since. i'm talking about the fact that they accelerated this program actively accelerated, moreover, as you know, women of 9 months. you can't 5 months. and if she is a member of the party so far, that in the program less than a five-year-old passes the program of the entire triad, they actively accelerated this program. i'm not saying that they will or won't

, but the acceleration has clearly happened, i don't know whether it will fly in december or not, i don't know, but anyway, they have announced that they will have. here is a test flight of this super plane, right? uh, this suggests that, in principle, the american establishment is also preparing to ensure that the clash with china, tying us up, really mine turned out to be not just in a war, which, from their point of view, should not have been very long, but even more protracted. and now, if they now have time, approximately, how do they evaluate? it's within six months to defeat russia, then now they will do all the talk about nuclear weapons. well, in my opinion. understand no deployment. basically it doesn't happen. this we marks our military respond. this is noted by the us military, who talks to politicians all the time. but what stands out there is horse mackerel with

petreus. e clark and the like. this is a broader task. this is a task of 5-6% of gdp. uh gdp for military purposes by the end of this decade. this is the main task, that is, to do. the american permanent war economy, that is component to return to what it was during the cold war and is needed for this. this nuclear hysteria is needed to position an adversary that can cause unacceptable damage in the united states, which the russian is already ready to use. this weapon is very. it is possible that under this noise there. uh, zelensky is really not a very adequate person. can they carry out some kind of operation there with a goal, even if they don’t detonate a dirty nuclear bomb, we can say that they did it, that is, on their own territory. yes, naturally territory. so they said that they are making a drone there, if they drop dirty nuclear bombs on our territory, how should

we react to this? well, i think we're already reacting to the plant being blown up to something that, well, much more difficult. i hope that soviet engineers built these stations with this in mind. the nuclear factor, too, although three assassination attempts on the kurdish have already been blown up from the inside. this is already expensive, another problem is a little more inside. this is a different issue when we are now talking about in order to increase, so to speak, the scale of our military preparations, it is not thought that, in principle, at present our government, including the commander in chief. well, they are trying to adapt society to the military situation. you understand when we compare here in the forty- first year in the forty-first year, in fact, the country turned out to be not ready, but it had been preparing for 20 years, but psychologically people were ready that this war would begin and they sang songs and films were shot and prepared for this war . he we are 30 years old. rather, for 20

years until 2007, they believed that there was no war will. we will fit into that, yes, that is, he said, yes, then who is the western community, which is supposedly a part of. therefore, uh, now, so to speak , to plump over the head about the fact that we are now entering the war, this war will be nuclear. and the entire population should be ready for this. no , i think it's war. of course, there won't be a nuclear one, and it's unlikely that all these talks are aimed precisely at instilling fear among the population. although in the west, there really is such a task to support this the population of our population our population is afraid of our population, in my opinion, so especially nuclear war. somehow not afraid. that's how much i didn't talk to the students, either they don't know what it is. here's how to say them. this is not particularly worrisome, because indeed in our country

such a stir around and such fear that causes a nuclear collision does not exist, because, in principle, we rely on what is in the west. when zelensky says that here is his bunker, why do you need nuclear weapons to destroy your future is generally nonsense. listen, there are others. methods. zelensky zelensky can say whatever zelensky wants when he now sees the center. he did not accidentally agree. he was told this to speak, banking decision-making center. well , what is the banking decision-making center that really positions itself this way? apparently , this is for him. yes, most likely, andrey, we should explain what the consequences will be so that they understand. well, for starters, there is no own people people, and then to his people. uh, putin has already been back several times already, the explanation is different things. now they are saying, if there is a strike, there will be a

tactical nuclear weapon on the territory of ukraine and what the west says, well, i explain the west says we will inflict a colossal blow on russian forces in ukraine we will sink the black sea fleet. they say it, they say it, retired people, but close to power. no one speaks with us, and what will then be our move in response, we don’t hear from anyone anywhere at all. but this it's good that our retired people are even retired people. in general, they are holding pretty reasonably sober positions so that if it were to be hit, if our answers were to be hit, then what would be the answer of the problem here in the answer does not exist, because if you say that there will be a hit, in- first, what is the quality of what kind of strike there is a nuclear tactical weapon. this is us right there, if we strike at one of the nato countries, then,

most likely, this can be immediately switched to strategic. of course, so the question is, that is, they are now doing a provocation. that's what he was talking about today, the minister of defense and the minister of defense of a number of nato countries warned them that ukraine was preparing. to conduct a nuclear provocation on the territory is yes. they are carrying out a provocation accusing russia of nato troops striking at our armed forces located on the territory plus destroying our black sea fleet. how we are hinted and stuff, you know? what will be the next answer? well, listen, well, firstly, there are our laws, there is a presidential decree, everything is written there, and there this situation is not written at all. no, if a strike on our armed forces, with any weapon anywhere, that is, any, then we answer how the concept of nuclear deterrence ends, this is a problem, if nato strikes under its own banner, well, it’s good to know under the

american flag it's different if a romanian bunch of americans go there unusually, because it's also nato troops. the united states is also nato. i mean, a common big nato. yes, american troops. this is what we do then shock part? well, here we are then what they will inflict under their own, of course, they will not under their own or under the flag of nato, they will now act in the way they have acted so far. and there is she did not use their supply of the use of the minister of finance. the same. i'm telling you, they will arrest all our finances abroad, they say, it can't be like this financially, there was terrorism a few years ago. i say, it's still not well, it's impossible, so it is here. well it's impossible, they don't take a hit no, because if they will put there, it's wrong. what would they, they are well aware that they do not understand this major nuclear treatment. they didn't understand. this is at the beginning, when they read that we will quickly finish all

this and therefore did not want to give weapons so as not to embarrass. now hand over all weapons. they are directly involved in this war, they directly give all the data involved in the development of operations now nato instructors at any level, including the battalion yes, if they are lower yes, there, maybe not even an instructor is needed, but there may be representatives of the countries above i lead the citizens. and what are we going to do next? we didn't say no. no no no, you can't destroy infrastructure bridges. we must let them accumulate weapons, and then they alone cannot enter. how much did this studio tell him? pee hard, he lived for 10 days, we destroy everything. here we are for the long haul. so not everything yet, yet. we are engaged in energy infrastructure. and what about

a little 750, what do you say about how i act, we de- decisively or not decisively, here we strike or we don’t strike, and i say about what is there when conflicts develop into a direct one with nato, then this conflict. yes, we are not sure that we do not recognize. this is an overgrowth and we will swallow another one. how can we recognize it, if this is an overgrowth, if there is one, they directly recognize that tanks are already a good designation for you today. they say that they gave moscow goals, they pointed the americans at moscow. on the moscow cruiser they gave officially they declared. well, not officially, not officially announced and their weapons are unofficial. they are the designers of it served. we can't now, but we can't. why not? no? why can't we do something all the time what do you say, why can't they lie all the time?

well, you can't do it every time. i can't eat a tear, so you can't. yes, maybe, maybe, and it was not necessary, only the fact is that we have called 300,000 now, right? 300 in total, we believe that this is limited, that's enough for us to hold chrome we thought that we would have enough of another front hold before that. we don't even go further than we don't set goals, for example, i really didn’t want to discuss the capture of the whole ukraine, but that’s all, i’ll say it all the same, you know what’s the matter. i was most interested in that, well, i thought, like every citizen of russia, so that i don’t have radiation dust here, and so on and so forth. whoever wants, i want to tell you, they now treat us like a rebellious colony. until the paragraph treats us this way, they do not consider us as a subject and the task is to

break this stereotype within two or three months. he deadly. it will turn into a nuclear war, but is not seen as a rebellious province of some western world by no means. and why are you distorting me in the western world colony? i said the colony of the colony whose western dachas, for god's sake it makes no sense that dangerous is that image was not considered. whole new year. take wolfas' memorandum. they treated us as how good enough the meaning is that as long as the stereotype is not broken by concrete actions. we are in mortal danger person, because if you interrupt, you change. you interrupt with you interrupted i bring. sorry then. you beat me, please, further and tell us how everything is fine. no, andrey, don't

say that everything is fine. i'm not saying how good it is. i just don’t think i don’t think, so to speak, in the right way. or rather, consider it necessary to pay attention to the fact that by 150 million we changed our position on december 15, when we issued a challenge. uh, half a billion. you know, him. maybe in economics, i don’t understand this economic power. we differ very seriously and each of our each of our shots must hit the target. they can pour sanctions. how can they throw weapons into the furnace from a watering can. as many as you like, because their industry is much stronger. we need to aim every shot at the target. he must hit. that's what i'm talking about, as long as there are problems for russia, not the soviet union nothing to offer the world now for one simple reason, we have integrated into this world, and he is an american here. you are

absolutely therefore talking about the fact that it should already be break those ties. they don't tear. all of us for the first time seriously declared in january 21 that we do not want this presence of will. it tears everything at once, so what does the possibility mean, i will tell you so, an attempt. find the opportunity will come to what will be the lack of will, yes. because, as always in a fight, the most spirited one wins regardless of size, if he waits for an opportunity, he will always lose an opportunity of a very conditional category, because if we count mathematically , we have no opportunity, because we have less than 3%, if we consider, according to the system that is most beneficial for us , the world gdp calculations, they have 50, if we consider the country’s mobilization resource of 150 million, or a combined billion, there is simply no chance. based on this, we must serve time and be quiet, but we decided that it is not our way that we

have. yes? it was impossible for us to sit, because we have the will. and if we have the will, then everything else should not go according to plan. and that we will never have sufficient opportunities to take into account the existing economic and numerical possibilities. volodya, i also spoke about the calculation of the calculation of what to wave to wave for a very long time with fists you can strike one blow, this is strategic. this one hit. yes, there is, so admire. yes, and we will admire how you apply it does not happen. this never happens. listen to this. it must be clearly understood. the will determines the setting of the task is dictated by the will, the translation of everything. now, when everything is set for the solution of the formulated will, the task of the will serves the goal, and this goal of the existence of the great state of russia is already more than russia showed on december 15th. and now it was an announcement

to make. it was an announcement. the will must be long, because the will builds everything around. will subjugates the manifestation of the most diverse and economic ideological formulation. we have nothing to offer the world. diametrically opposite. vasya the same wording that december 15 we challenged those who are much. yes , because there is something to say to the world. and the south hears this, in principle, the south hears what it means to have something to say, russia does not want to be american-centric. they they didn’t say, it means that the world has something to say and the challenge is thrown. what kind of ideology? so it is necessary to formulate to the end and go with it, in particular , what putin said in the st. george hall that we oppose satanism is very strong. and very powerful very clearly, showing the direction

of movement, therefore, ideologically, by the way, a lot. and what was said sounds for the first time and very clearly and harshly. now it is necessary to build everything for the victory in accordance with the will and the formulated tasks . do not look for an explanation why it is not now and not so. get settled and eat. there is gradualness. and this gradualness from such a huge ship happens immediately. there is no gradualness in such a course when there is a war with nato. this is what sergei ern ivanovich spoke about. if we rebuild it is necessary, if not by jump, then everything will be lost. i understand everything, it’s better to start immediately with the armata as an end point. for me, this is also a great option, but it’s possible for the audience anyway, no one called for this. i offer always so little of it.

i generally have a very rigid wording better death than disgrace. in general, i believe that real courage begins only from the moment when you stop thinking, you know how the japanese samurai talked about the consequences of their actions. uh-huh, there is a need to understand here, we have chosen and we are moving towards the goal. and if you read oh, but to us for this, then we are all for it. we did not find we are moving towards the goal normally, in my opinion, normally. no, of course, the pace should be completely different. it's always interesting how it all starts. now you will see everything manufacturers of good things want and most importantly, but

best to check.

china has never been able to tell north korea about its

policy; it influences the north korea, but there was already a case when north korea dragged both china and the soviet union into the war against their will, by its own decision, the korean war. started by the decision of the businessman can not. it was the beginning of the korean war that did not allow, they say, jedun to land santa ivan, which was planned then so that one should not exaggerate the importance of food with stalin where stalin writes, let the korean family decide their own fate and after which the war began. first stalin had plans for berlin and the korean war. he was prevented from washing his face by plans for taiwan, the korean war and ushala, but the north koreans, in general, they understand that if they start

a war with the soviet union and so on, neither russia today will have no choice but to support them. that's all. even if they agree, because china will not allow it. north korea become a victim of the americans what the north koreans did not do. but what they want to do is something else. uh, a little about israel, a lot idealization. israel, the israeli army, everything yes, we respect the military, we respect the military, who differ in the military simpler and the special forces did not have success with the military in the leadership of the state and only two former military men stood at the head of the country from the guard. and here is the bar and aleksha.

called successful in varying degrees can only work? it is unlikely that his friend and commander vorokh and his political career were far from successful. and their coming to power was against the backdrop of denunciation of the political elite. and then who do they turn to? here look this is the political elite, and we also have a former lawyer journalist. party bureaucrats, what they have done in life, only involuntarily turn, well, at least they did something to the military, and the experience with them is very, very unsuccessful, none of them achieved anything, except that he lost all his military authority to a political relic. who for six months? who in a year, who in two and until today ? and with the heads of special services there was nothing at all.

the only one who was the head of the government was iskhakshemir, who was one of the leaders, musat. he never advertised it. a habit, and others did not even get to it so that military success in the military field and certain fighting qualities do not say anything about a person's ability to be a good leader and statesman. yes, he served the state to manage the state and to serve the state are two different things. so this is israel, this is in other countries of the united states, there was one successful military man, the most unsuccessful president of the united states but we didn’t, although there was a prime minister you have a person who has never served in the army,

at least for the whole generation of servicemen tire fitting. never served in the army. but he was the prime minister, but to get to the point that the deserter from the army was the president. it was only in the united states damn it. deserted and then the united states they even have a deserter. and today the current president, what he said recently. does my wife think i'm doing the right thing? think president, great power, who cares what his wife thinks. what does it matter what she thinks of her husband? he says, and since she is so

thinks, then i must do. well, before this insanity, only one person reached your president with russia. he also threw out such things, well, then you all planned it. here is what andrew said, it is very correct. in the foreign political arena you are super modest you don't call a spade a spade not only is there a foreign policy concept behind it. but after all, it will be necessary to negotiate. so now let's act as if we are starting to negotiate. that's when the fight is over, then you will agree. and during a fight, they fight during the war, they fight and do not lead it. so, and what will happen

after the results will be after and your country, your people were not ready for the situation in which he said. most of you do not understand that the threat of a war for russia was real. part of the population does not believe in this, but who threatened russia? what are you saying? yes, it led to this. and the by-products of this. why did the t-90 do so much ? the fact that tanks were sold to someone is not a player of such an attitude, they were supplied to the army. only tanks. how much the army asked, the army asked for so many tanks, why, because they gave her money only for this amount, and who distributes the money? they said, here you will receive money for

such and such a number of aircraft, such a number of tanks. you can tamrate, but we won't give you a ruble more. and why? but because they did not prepare for the war that is now going on? we thought we could get by with less. and therefore, they did not prepare the army for the fact that the army might need a good organization to mobilize reserves. it turned out that you don’t have reservists, but you don’t have a system. for some reason, they decided that military service should be one year. they didn’t calculate in 1 year what can be prepared and what will be the combat capability of such an army, if a

soldier served in the army of conscripts for one year, what can they do, that is, if the soldiers of the urgent army are not ready to fight, and there are only 300,000 contract soldiers. there is no reserve, so what the army was counting on in a war not against ukraine. now you are right to say war against nato. but this is not at war yet, it participates in the war, and if there was a war with nato, 300,000 contract soldiers were enough for you for a year of service. are you a soldier they make a fighter no? do you have any reserves? and you don't have a system of reservists. this is the situation today, so why should the people understand that the country is under threat if there is none of this? create anew or maybe you need

to return and still there is no solution for cropped divisions, so if you had cropped divisions here and a mobilization system, then everything looked different. by the way, i don't think 300.000 were taken in order to hold positions no this is a mistake. it is completely different to keep with what is. they took it for another purpose, but we will see this in mid-november, and then one more thing surprises me. here, yes, you approve of those who donate to the army, buy something that is different, this is savagery. everything that the soldiers need must be bought by the ministry of defense. all there are no private donations, you want honest donations. or maybe you will announce if there is not enough money? and let the oligarchs lay out their

money. which i spend on what and let those who want to buy. something for the army let them buy, and then the ministry of defense will decide if he does not have enough money. i have something in an ideal world, you are right, but you bought something that the ministry of defense had not seen for a long time, for example, a large number of quadrocopters at the moment when a person goes to the store. there can also apply, but the matter of procurement of the ministry of defense. in theory, it may not be a theory; there is no practice of practice. sorry or there is a ministry defense or not? the ministry of defense has a procurement department of the ministry of defense cannot apply, so it needs to be dispersed and the west is not built, because it operates within the prescribed laws and because according to our laws it cannot just go and buy it, especially in

an erotic machine that established and statutory acts that are tied hand and foot complicate the process so much that they need to know the next fiscal year. why was it correctly said by andrei that a number of laws need now just hard. and now, yesterday , the day before yesterday, i was at the ministry of defense. there are two functions. the first is to provide the army with all the necessary functions. if for this it exists not to command the chief of the general staff to provide the army with everything necessary - this is the first function of the second minister of defense. he pursues with the help of the army the policy of the state in the field of defense formulates and procurement is more other than the army, and who formulates the ministry of defense, what the army needs, well, who formulates the ministry of defense

formulates what the army needs from under how, based on the needs of the army, how are we discussing it together with the army? uh-huh it 's just perfectly aware of the department of defense, who's to say? we need something to stand, steadfastly the general staff of the idea of ​​​​defense. with the army and together with the ministry of finance, it determines what the army will ask for from the army nomenclature. the same is formulated by the military, that is, the general staff needs so much , of course, about which the military formulate its requirements. the ministry of the interior is transforming purchases in accordance with the budget that it receives. if the budget is for a certain number of tanks, then they cannot buy more. isn’t it the other way around, it turns out to be a compromise.

what was said, when the discussion ends with the ministry of defense of the financial state, they say that you have such a budget and then the ministry of defense, based on the budget that it received after all its own. then look how many planes they can buy with this budget, but everything is decided by the budget. it distributes the budget of the ministry of defense, it does not determine its own budget. and the one who determined that the ministry defense is such a budget, they are larger and it determined how many tanks you will have. how many planes will you have? how many of these weapons that you saw at the parade today are used at the front of the

coalition. i have not seen an excellent gun, the best in the world. heard about her prokalitsa, of course, saw her at the front. we saw her above, we saw her results. and why is a good question expensive money worth money? i think that there is still no main problem, it doesn't matter, but the important thing is that the country and the last thing i wanted to say? your president correctly assesses the situation that neither from ukraine nor from europe objectively no russia has contradictions there is no conflict between russia and europe there is no conflict

between russia and ukraine in europe, not in ukraine, the main reason is in the united states, but based on the fact that in the united states it is necessary to talk about it out loud, victoria says and all accusations aside nato they are useless. this is not nato, this is the united states, embarrassed to call a spade a spade. andrey says something and the infection of the usa the united states behaves like an enemy of russia russia is trying to speak with them in a polite language and the latter cannot be recognized as power for propaganda purposes, as someone who does not own power in the united states who would not want to control that power , which is it makes laws. she holds and

says that we do not recognize this power. it's just as stupid. like american propaganda for propaganda is an action, a decision is taken by subtle political trolling, but in vain i, i don’t really like these trollings, specific things, the head of the united states is the president who gives the order. this, by the way, is a big question, but it's worth exactly it ends in full agreement, what does it say? i say that he is considered to be israel. yes , successfully there, unsuccessfully traced is that there were no traitors at all, and at the same time there are too many ordinary people who are in this political clearing, like cows on ice. everything right, but there are other examples. well, for example, here is the nobility. yes, it had to fight. at least before catherine, yes, it means that all political power was formed from him. yes, here is such an example from the russian empire. well , in the end there is an example of comrade stalin. what

happened there, therefore? so i agree that there, israel, why should we trifle? we have other examples right? i just want to say all the time that even in relatively democratic countries, you can still increase the prestige armed forces. and this was done. this, but this is not the main thing at all, the main thing is the following. now, when i listen to all this, i have some kind of feeling, only one thing, that time flows here in one way somewhere in the state duma in another kherson third and so on. well, the main question is that there is a certain reality inside the reality in which we found ourselves, in which we got stuck. inside this reality, all our actions are caught, they all turn out to be, and, as it were, paralyzed by the counter -actions of the enemy, the conclusion is the conclusion. is in that it is necessary to change the reality and it is necessary to act, not proceeding from what has programmed the reality here and everywhere, but

contrary to this, in another way there is the concept of a figure, and a player and masters in um. the master of the game, if now we give them the role of this master of the game, then any actions, pieces and players of the most brilliant ones are still lost, because they are not only the masters of the game. they are still changing the rules of the game. so you need to start doing it yourself, that is, to do the only thing that they do not expect. i got lost quickly and carefully because if start changing so that we blow up the existence. that is , the army system is a giant elephant. he still has an impulse from head to tail. there will be so much time. there are so many wheels spinning that there is nowhere else to go, and finally, look. what kind of war was needed? what kind of army, well, damn it, not

the budget, it is determined not by the minister of finance and not by the central bank, it is determined by the political will of the strategic head of state. and it does not define anything else. tell me what kind of war will be and order to allocate the budget that is needed for victory in this war. this means that within what existed, there was a reality that existed, but we must admit this, within it, this war did not exist, this war did not have a budget, there was such an army, what kind, and so on. now we need to understand, yes, yes, they made a mistake, they made a mistake, it’s okay, as it were, i remember that there i said a long time ago that as long as the government exists, it makes mistakes and corrects them. she's lost when she can't fix her mistakes, yes, do you think i'm now saying citizens were such such and such mistakes, yes, we repent, what will happen to the rating the rating will jump

right? yeah right away, so the question now is to start by changing the entire strategy, the entire concept, all reality, slowly, carefully and persistently, focusing on the fact that there will be no more peace in this territory. there will only be war. and this is not as bad as it seems at the beginning, if you prepare for it correctly. now advertising. we have been trying for many years, by and large, to let people live. well, of course, that was the challenge. well, what's the budget, which is, yes to people, so that i can now watch, for some reason a large number of german bloggers went. they compare the standard of living of russians. eh, there in 2000 there were 2,000 there, that is, the growth, of course, is colossal, but the time comes when it is necessary to do tough and not by bread alone. now that time has come. this does not mean that we

will live worse, but in order to simply live, we must win, otherwise we will live, otherwise we must win the war against, as we say, it is no longer necessary. so we have speak usa beauty is increasing. not even i know that here this rat king, or something, shows his interview, but i showed part , moreover, he was so frank, not so long ago in the ninety-fifth quarter. that's just how he felt his fate. here's how he explained what would happen to the money. 40 billion dollars is quite enough, perhaps we will settle accounts with the european union, but for now we will sit. what deputies will spend 40 billion on a beautiful chevrolet yes, prophetically, but at

the same time it is in the language that is now impossible to speak. that's what the russian-speaking character is cattle, who even betrayed his mother at one time by the name of danilov as he talks about the russian language. the russian language must disappear from our territory, in general, as an element of hostile propaganda about vanya's brains for the beginning of the population, english is a must, our native language, of course, it is a must, and this has been repeatedly said to besiege here. these are russian narratives. very very dangerous things. look, you don't need anything. let them fathers from us of their swamp and croak in their russian language. well, beautifully melodious ukrainian language. i will show you again zelensky showed uh uh, special hissing hissing whistling sounds. the government wanted iran.

well, what to do zelensky’s dear, she says not very illiterate, but nothing konstantinovich, if danilov didn’t exist, then it would be necessary to invent him because he is the best propagandist and agitator by explanation. to all the russian people, if this whole russian people hears what he says to the russian population of ukraine for what and in the name of what we are fighting now in the special operation zone, simply no one can give a better explanation. he most intelligibly and clearly explained why we do this? as for the current moment, it is obvious that

this whole week is filled with concern for the outcome of the struggle , or rather the beginning and continuation of the outcome of the struggle for kherson, not only because it must be defended and in this way the obligations assumed to protect the subjects that became part of the russian federation must be fulfilled. and because this is the direction of the main blow. for the future this is a springboard from which it is possible to develop success, if it is reached and thus deprive ukraine of supplies from the sea, deprive her of the status of a maritime power. she has already lost the sea of ​​azov, if she loses the black sea, if we succeed. to reach the border with pridnestrovie in the future, then this will actually be, this is the very victory that will allow us

to speak in a completely different way and demand to take into account everything that we have achieved. i paid attention to this from the very beginning of this military operation. despite the importance of all other areas. this direction is not only us. this direction benefactors and sponsors of ukraine are considered as the most important from here such a country of the moment. i believe that we are doing this evacuation so that there are fewer civilian deaths, because there is a very serious battle ahead, and it is actually going on, but apparently. she hasn't reached her peak yet. a civilian, of course, should not interfere with the military correctly if they leave the safe zone, marat fell asleep, he already said today. and that housing certificates have already begun to be issued. so he

'll be fine that he promised what he promised including speaking to us this week, explaining with the finance minister. how will the people who leave be wealthy? eh, today their dwellings on the right bank? well , it has already been in history. the civilian population of the city of stalingrad that which could not participate directly in the defense, it, of course, was evacuated from stalingrad at the moment when we defended it, the zaporizhzhya and kherson battalions are being formed . in my opinion the solution. let it not yet the end is clear. from the point of view of practice, which should change, this is the decision to create a coordinating council, which was headed by

the prime minister, in fact. this may not be in full, but some kind of answer to the request for the creation of a state defense committee. or, more precisely, the answer to the question. how can we provide for the needs? fronts to the rear so that we all do not worry about quadrocopters, body armor, warm underwear and everything else. we love an old friend. we will be told so not by this little thing. this is a small piece of side bc high-precision. tanks new trunks 152 everything you need everything for the front. here's what you need in crazy quantities. i have no doubt about it. i have no doubt about it, the public sees this side of the matter. she is primarily involved in this. she doesn't buy tanks and she doesn't buy planes. although this was during the war years,

individual masters of culture were formed at the expense of the population of the russian orthodox church. they were all planes. they bought with their mountains, and you don’t have to renounce this either, and this in itself is also can be assessed as positive, but only if it is in fact basic. and the efforts of the state are able to use in order to ensure victory with everything necessary. teddy bear between fu christian is now a favorite. trouble will come,

do not go behind the stone. no, it won't, i'll kill them all.

as for the plans that were before february 24, the scale of what we had to do here, there may very well have been miscalculations and mistakes. here, as always, it happens in history, and in this case it is bitter. but it was an army that was being built.