with intolerably uncomfortable and politically correct, but as is customary in the american media mainstream, thomas is a man who won because he competed with women who are biologically disadvantaged correctly, but for some reason our media celebrates cheating, who can replace her? who is capable of this is there another person in the country who is as superficial and prejudiced as the jentsaks. what is her name carine jean-pierre since joe biden became president, the price of gasoline has doubled as well as the price of others goods necessary for americans to live is one of his favorites, so to walk through the anti-russian policy of washington, without hesitation in expressions , opponents called carlson the cheerleader of russia because of such remarks. he spoiled relations even with the happiness of the stable republican party. so wait. why is it considered not loyal to take the side of russia and loyal if you are for ukraine

vladimir do you sympathize with the russians? well, yes, it corresponds to the russian one. propaganda while our economy is degrading, and there are practically no borders, this guy is lecturing us giving us a list of tanks for christmas i want this and that and send me a bike. yes, quickly, he tells us that we must launch a nuclear strike against russia in involvement in sabotage. on nord stream, the ether was shaken by nosax, and the well-known retired colonel richard black, he fought in vietnam from the series, later was a senator and ended his army career as head of the criminal law department, so he was used to working with evidence due to energy problems and was almost ready to abandon the sanctions quite logically. that one of the goals of the united states

was to destroy the pipeline, then the europeans can tear and throw as much as they want, but if they say turn on the nord stream and restore it is already impossible to do and the protest fizzles a little, and even earlier in an interview with representatives of the schiller institute, colonel black criticized the white house policy in relation to russia. on the approach of officials in the united states to solving some world problems, machiavellian states and nato do not care about ukrainians women will die civilians. children soldiers , we still have it turned into some kind of football game. we don't care. how many private players playing for our money will be crippled on the field. the main thing is that we win now we supply a fantastic amount of weapons. and this led to the fact that the rating, which produces missiles and nord roth ground, which creates rocket aircraft, all these defense companies began to receive super profits and swell from the dollar. among those who tried in the

early nineties to bring russia closer to the united states was eduard lausanne soviet dissident nuclear physicist over the years of his life in america has become. there, those who are called the back channel people's diplomat since the eighty- eighth year, eduard dmitrievich helped organize the visits of the delegation. the us later brought in insiders from washington, the founder of the herritos foundation, half a varia, who directly contacted bush sr. and urged the white house to develop a plan for integration with russia that the soviet union and the other he went to the white house. i was waiting for him there cafe nearby. here i had to tell you that you know. well, uh, i have a mixed feeling about the mixservice, because when i started hmm you'll talk, uh huh, he listened very carefully and it was interesting, maybe before that even to talk to them. if the senators, that is, not only for here, but then the calendar went out of it was his. there

, on soviet affairs, she was very skeptical about her. i didn't really like it. he brings delegations holds conferences in congress in washington every year the world russian forum takes place in the ninety-third year, we invited a delegation from e russia from home and from ukraine and there was a meeting in the way that representatives of the pentagon and even the cia spoke in congress and before us, i remember it very well then and it was a question of how america can help to ensure that relations between russia and ukraine develop in a positive direction. and that in general there are three countries russia and america, uh, here they were ukraine, some of them, but a cluster, or something, uh, and set an example for other republics. well, all suggestions. as a result, promises not to expand nato and create an arc will be ignored.

security will remain so. blank is a congressman from a speechwriter, and he was also. they , like him, were one of those who promoted the idea of ​​cooperation, all those congressmen who talked about this, all these are all putin's agents and i gradually squeezed out one by one. legs of politics in the us among them is democratic senator daniel moy in the 98th debate, where jubaiden also participated. he assured that this would open the way to nuclear war, then the principle of not using force first, which saved humanity in the 20th century, would end once. and they have this weapon, then ironically. after the end of the cold war. we may face nuclear armageddon. the topic of nuclear

war has occupied peter kuznek all his adult life as a professor of history at the american university in washington and director of the institute for nuclear research, always combining political activity and a scientific career and shouting about the nuclear danger. if we take, for example, a local nuclear war between india and pakistan, we will talk about 100 bombings equal to hiroshima the stratosphere will go from five to ten million tons of smog and debris in 2 weeks. they block sunlight. it will start to get cold. most of the agriculture will be destroyed and this will lead to 2 billion victims. coming out in a family of left-wing new york intellectuals and the descendant of lacoste victims today is known for its sharp criticism of america's foreign policy in 2012 with director oliver stone published a book untold

history of the united states at the same time a series of the same name was released in them an alternative vision of many events american and world history. we were undoubtedly allies during world war ii. it was an outstanding alliance that fought against fascism and japanese militarism, but as recent polls have shown, the role of the ussr has not received due recognition according to the latest polls, only 17% of europeans recognize it as a decisive role in the defeat of nazism and only 7% of the french, what is happening now considers the most dangerous point at which the world has ever been shown, eisenhower said we better equip ourselves with the right weapons. how do we succumb to communism, and kennedy said during the cuban crisis let it be better. my children will be red dead. we had leaders who at least had some sanity and decency and a different vision of the world. joe biden is not a bad person, but he has

surrounded himself with war hawks. he has 18 advisers from the center of the new american security. they are more opposed to china, russia, but russia mixed up his plans for the invasion of ukraine, he drove in the series across america, debunking the myths about nuclear deterrence. the atomic bomb dropped on japan accelerated the end of world war ii nato expansion, we understood from the very beginning that it would be a curse in russia in the ninetieth gorbachev. promised no expansion. not only bushy-baker. and leader after leader, but since the nineties , the alliance has increased by 14 countries, and now there are 16 more of them, ambassador burns wrote in a secret memorandum. no, then no, don't cross the red line america and canon and nice warned about this and it's not the pacifists apologists for the cold war abiden trump

sent more weapons. more instructors. russia was provoked, but still it was her monstrous mistake to invade. and now she pays a big price, he is convinced that miro's ignorance of the history of history in particular by the americans allows politicians to manipulate the name, i compare what is happening now with 1979, when on christmas the ussr in toxins, afghanistan, carter's adviser brzezinski, then shed crocodile tears in public, they say . what terrible aggression, but behind the scenes, he and carter opened champagne to mark the occasion back in a july memo to the president. he said that as soon as we begin to provide military assistance to the mujahideen of the ussr will have to start the invasion putin wants to make russia again great

modi wants to make india again great xi china baidan america but no one talks about the planet. i know gorbachev is not as popular in russia as stalin was. but he was the one who spoke about humanity and the elimination of nuclear weapons. a political scientist, a diplomat of the eighties, worked at the mexican embassy, ​​then in the soviet department of the foreign ministry, and later on the english hill in the leadership of the republican party in the senate, finding this positions all stages of the collapse of the soviet union i was among the few people then in the state department, and in the senate, who really believed that the end of the ussr was possible. i had such a set of american and russian flags on my desktop and they asked me what kind of white blue-red flag. i say the russian

flag no, no, they say russian. this is a red sickle and a hammer is not. here is russian. he will be back again his father was a military pilot and an ardent anti-communist the 21st century has changed the attitude of both of them to what is happening you know russian for many years for years i've been asked what we did wrong, how we should have done differently, to avoid what happened. i answer nothing you could do the problem is not you about us not in russia china iran north korea venezuela and in the usa the ideological imperative with which they are armed. when the ussr disappeared, i was relieved? i thought we'd be back to normal , like it was before world war i before 1914, when the powers weren't ideologically colored yes , protecting their interests, but for the sake of world

stability, but i didn't expect the us to start project of global domination, as outlined in william crystal and robert kagan's article on the project for a new american century. kagan, by the way, it is no coincidence that the husband of victoria lund, the architect of our policy in ukraine, all his people finally dispersed after the bombing of yugoslavia, i was wrong, because i did not understand what kind of people stood at the head of my country for them, the main problem was neither communism nor the soviet regime, but that the united states should always rule the world, that we need our own kind communism, which we will impose on the rest instead of the world, progress-socialism will be a democracy of human rights, a free market in our interpretation. in august, junjatra s raima govert, several more

american politicians and activists were blacklisted by the ukrainian disinformation counteraction center, they were accused of russian propaganda and declared information terrorists, the list was compiled by an organization within the ukrainian government, funded by the united states, although, as far as i understand, the entire government financed by the usa so there is not much difference, but the question arises. to what extent did american intelligence help? when compiling the list, this six means that our own government is persecuting people like me this is a very worrying sign ukraine could be a successful independent state, having good relations with russia like canada usa austrians germany but this was unacceptable to washington no matter. how many times has russia been looking for a modus winde verdict

agreement, like the minsk agreements, which western countries and ukraine refused to comply so we ended up where we were. in a sense, i even hope that the ukrainian crisis, the situation in the world will lead to the collapse of the so-called western mainstream on the rules of the world order. if this happens, the us will go through something similar to the experience of the ussr in 1991. i hope that after this, a normal healthy america will appear, which can have friendly relations with russia, but how the grip of this ideological madness will not weaken. i'm afraid nothing good may happen. do you think

that we have always been doomed to be enemies and especially rivals. here, looking from today, when the relationship, well, below zero - this is too strong a word, just like the word is doomed. i would say that it was always not our destiny to become allies, but there is healthy competition and unhealthy, unfortunately, relations today belong to the second category estimates. causes of the crisis, among us there is at least one very respected analyst of lorealism. political scientist john wersheimer in 2014. he published an article in the most authoritative magazine explaining to her why the west is to blame for the crisis in ukraine and then he also gave an open lecture on

youtube, it was watched by 12 million people, mostly the united states is a lot. on the same topic in 2022, it again became a hit with almost 28 million views where he expressed a lack of understanding of the us foreign policy strategy are you ready to risk a nuclear war because of a plot of real estate in ukraine, which is not a strategic interest of the united states, but at the same time we are talking about its accession to nato, that is, you would think that we give a guarantee of protection in the event of an attack under the fifth amendment to a country that is not our interest. this only speaks of how discredited foreign policy is. is this one of the many riots we made? it

's like being touched by the kings of dasa, only in reverse, and none of them ended. okay? iraq afghanistan libya now, ukraine in america at different times there were many organizations that advocated rapprochement with moscow. one of these american committees, for reaching an agreement between the united states and russia, it united american politicians and journalists. and because of what, thoughts are not yet the most popular in the media space. ng in search of the roots of current events, one must look back to the beginning of the 2000s, when the nato expansion project was launched and the ongoing demonization, not only of putin, but of everything related to russia, of our cold war tree-cropping policy. like, for example, withdrawing from the pro treaty, of course, russia is to blame for the situation. today. it was putin's decision to invade. although i understand

that this is done for security reasons, i think it would be difficult to say that all means have been exhausted. among the most prominent leaders of this committee was stephen cowin. a historian, he did not become a major specialist in the ussr in 2020 who fought all his life against the demonization of russia and searched for the roots of the ukrainian conflict; the unification of the two germany the alliance will not move east, and it also represents to the russians the hypocrisy of the usa and double standards since the mid-nineties there has been an incredible expansion of the american sphere of influence right to the borders of russia every administration, including the obama, told you there can be no sphere of influence, because it is old thinking. russians may be cruel, but not stupid. committee members will meet on october 27.

this day, exactly 60 years ago, went down in history as black saturday, when the caribbean crisis reached its apogee and it is important. remind the real danger of a nuclear conflict today. especially since biden's politics is a journalist. cardin calls it much more maximalist than the leaders of the past. the biden administration's maximalism is manifested at every step and in words and literally by virtue of the fact that i am more than many billions of dollars. he supports these outrageous goals that the president, zelensky, for example, the ridiculous idea of ​​\u200b\u200btaking back crimea, but the ukrainian government has many powerful friends here and they suggest giving zelensky everything he needs. he must be supported by his every statement. the biden administration voluntarily fell into the thrall of these voices, which for decades remained ardent opponents of putin's russia

. eduard is fond of storytelling and wrote this waltz this year gradually . since we are now trying in conditions where relations are, frankly , complex, and complex is too soft, some believe that in general we are sliding into the third world war here too. uh, maybe remember some historical moments. there is such a meeting on the elbe, and we have such a movement of the whole spirit of the elbe. he is sure a few years ago there was a new chance of rapprochement during the presidency of donald, trump, but he sincerely believes that friendship

with russia is good, and it’s not bad that trump understood the deep state that we were talking about, right? either there or uh, there are different uh, energy terms. hmm and they didn't let them do it and his mistake is that he didn't manage to surround himself as a team personally. you, uh, find some explanation. why every time all these rapprochement attempts ended in failure. i can answer very briefly with quotes from the famous american diplomat, former ambassador to moscow , jordan. far from being a friend of the ussr or russia. it was one of the cold war opposers of containment. in soviet times, i understand that he comes and said such a phrase. if suddenly we wake up in the morning and find out that the soviet union, we will urgently have to find a new enemy, because without this enemy our economy will collapse. that is, he

justified it, purely economically, that this one the huge military industrial complex that hmm exists it inflicts. well, first of all , taxes are the motor of one of the advertising motors of the american economy, think tanks, which are said in different ways, cover only 10% of the us population. they determine foreign policy. the remaining 90. it seems that they do not decide anything on the issue carried out by the institute. quincy. almost 60% of voters are in favor of the fact that the united states seeks a solution to the conflict in ukraine at the negotiating table, they are on the battlefield and within america, skepticism is growing regards to the militaristic approach that washington has chosen when the risk of nuclear war is so high, it's clear why sane experts have been

calling for détente between the us and russia for years as tensions escalate steadily. tele2 presents the content of the subscriptions is an illusion of an offer. it does not take into account individual preference. welcome to the real world. we at tele2 give you the opportunity to collect a subscription by yourself. this unique offer pays only for the selected content and there are no analogues to this. and also a subscription mix, maybe acquire not even our subscriber. only selected services in the subscription, the mix, even where the cold reigns, there is one who is stronger. you understand an international brand with many years of expertise in the development of engine oils for harsh climates

where quality standards are paramount . buy teboil dimons cold hardened oil at zte boil. unpleasantly surprised prices for osago osago in the world with a benefit of up to 60% here i bought goods for the whole family. everything in the house cosmetics and topic brought. i wanted outrageous. i took the instrument of my dream with, moreover, in order to pay later, buy on yandex.market with discounts of up to 70% at speed

. the kravchuks from the kursk region lived in perfect harmony for many years, went by the hand, went to meet him, until a woman was found on the internet by her school love, he lived in the distant siberian village of

shushenskoye andrey kravchuk built a crossbow in the passenger seat. i cut it off and each one separately, i pulled the lever here and the device worked. he failed to cope with the razluchnikov, and then he asked for help brother. it is very difficult for such people to refuse. here uh sense of rightness agreed this case and conducted their own investigation.

we watch to explore the world of educational programs and documentaries we watch for free without registration.

this is how the response to a possible nuclear attack of the enemy looks like all the details, how the exercises of the strategic forces of nuclear deterrence took place in russia sovereignty and is directly controlled from the united states, which uses it as against russia ukraine, having lost independence, became the source of the main threats to the fight with