that is, the situation that has developed today is now the issue of regulating the peace treaty. our position is that this peace treaty is, of course, needed. and we support this uh peace settlement as well as the delimitation. uh, something border and complete regulation of the border issue. we are for this question. eh, what uh such an option to choose this case. eh, armenia of the armenian people and the armenian leadership. in any case, whichever option is chosen. uh, if it comes to the world, we're all for it, but we're not going to impose anything. we cannot, uh, armenia and we are not going to dictate to armenia what is this? if the armenian people

today's armenian leadership believes that, well, you need to choose some specific option. this is a peace treaty in the so-called washington, as far as i understand, it provides for the recognition of azerbaijan's sovereignty over karabakh as a whole, but if armenia thinks so, please. we will support any choice of the armenian people, if uh the armenian people, and hmm armenia believe uh, the armenian leadership believes that uh does karabakh have its own peculiarities? so it is necessary to take into account the peculiarities and somehow this needs to be discussed in the future in the contract. this is also possible, but definitely. uh, we need to negotiate with azerbaijan, these agreements must be acceptable for, uh, the other side for azerbaijan. this is a very complex and frankly difficult question. well , uh, armenia is our strategic

partner and ally, and we, of course, to a large extent, meaning interests. uh, azerbaijan we will focus on what will offer herself, armenia well, 2 years ago. uh, at our conversations, the president erdogan spoke very highly of the fact that he doesn’t wag his tail even a real man. uh, in those 2 years a lot of things happened too. eh, your score remains the same. well, yes, he is a strong strong leader, who is guided primarily, or maybe exclusively by the interests of turkey of the turkish people and the interests of the turkish economy, to a large extent , this explains his position on energy issues in construction issues. say we proposed to the turkish stream, and now, uh, hmm, and

the turkish side also agreed to create a gas hub in turkey for consumers in europe, of course, primarily based on its own interests. eh means e. in the field of tourism there is a lot of interesting sector, there are a lot of interests in agriculture. we have a lot of matching vectors. e mutual interests. and therefore, yes, and president erdogan never allows himself to sit on his neck and uh and uh. to be guided by the interests of third parties, but he, of course, protects their dialogues with us, before interests and in this sense, turkey in general and president erdogan in particular are not easy partners. many decisions. mm are born in such long and difficult disputes, negotiations, but there is a

desire on both sides to reach these agreements. and we generally have these arrangements of these negotiated. in this sense, we achieve erdogan, of course, a consistent and reliable partner. here is the old one. this is probably the most important feature. he is a reliable partner. and he himself does not try to sit on your neck, for example, you know, i said that the president of turkey is a partner, and he always defends his interests, well, not personal, but the country is interesting. well, it's not like he's trying. here ours he just fights for what his government thinks his adviser thinks is optimal . we fight to make decisions that are uh optimal for us. well, as a rule, i repeat, we find these uh, these solutions even on very sensitive issues. let's say in syria, yes,

security issues. uh, well, the economy, including in terms of infrastructure, we have managed to do all this so far. i repeat once again. this is extremely important. uh, well, we understand that if we went through the hard way, uh it was difficult to finish, but we agreed on something you can be sure that it will be done. this is the most important reliability and stability in this relationship. thank you. my name is sri lanka. mr. president, they say that now russia is facing a proxy war that the west, the collective west and nato are waging with you by proxy. if this is so, perhaps the most serious threat that russia

has faced since 1941, then the great patriotic war began and the communist then leader of the ussr decided to establish a dialogue with the roc in order to create a broad front to defend russia could you say that in a similar way you could so to speak, to return to this heritage, for example, to the heritage of the seventeenth year in order to use the old one. which could be useful, for example, the legacy of the red army could , for example, use the help communist elements, no matter how few they may be in order for them to enter this broad patriotic front. thanks, my position is. my position is that, uh, i think it's necessary, uh, to use

all of our historical legacy. i don't think you can give up on anything. no, there is nothing positive that was connected with the tsarist empire in the history of russia; eh, they were overcome in different ways and had different consequences. as regards the relationship of e, it means with the left e part of our political spectrum, e and e with other political currents. you know, because the peculiarity of today's russia is that we have almost complete concentration on the fight against external threats. yes, there are people with absolutely pro-western orientations, uh, who live like this, mostly mentally there are families, their children

study there. uh, so, well, yes, there is such a small part, well, it has always been and always is in everyone countries, nothing special here, but overall uh, very big. uh, well, the consolidation is very big , regardless of the political coloring and views on the way of development of russia itself. well, people of communist convictions believe that basically everything needs to be nationalized. again, everything is from the state. you need to stand and so on. yes, how effective it is. eh, well, it's hard to say e in something e in something and somewhere in some in some particular historical situation. we don't give up on this either. there is a law on nationalization, but we do not. no need. we do not proceed from the fact that it is necessary to

use the most effective tools for the development of the country - market principles, but under the control of the state of state power under the control of the people on and. e, and. using these benefits to direct them to the main goals of improving the welfare of the country to combat poverty in e, expanding our efforts and achieving better results in the field of housing education health care solutions other extremely important issues for people. uh, so, uh, so uh, we're working. with respect, we treat those people who adhere to the left view, including communist beliefs. eh, the soviet union, as it were rightly said, they themselves mentioned lived a long time. well, under control under the leadership of the communist party , i will not go into details there, where there,

what was good, what was bad you mentioned religious organizations, but uh, we have them all uh, we have four traditional religions. uh, everyone, uh, extremely patriotic . concerns the russian orthodox church. she has always been with her pasta with her people throughout history, the same thing is happening today, huh? the key difference may be today in relations with confessions with our traditional confessions is that we not only outwardly, but essentially we do not interfere in the life of religious organizations. we may have them in a much more free position than in many countries that are considered democratic. we never we exert no pressure, we believe that they are indebted to them, because during the soviet era their property was squandered. find out abroad

sold out, there and so on and so forth. that is , uh, cause great damage to a religious organization, including the russian orthodox church, but we try to support all our confessions. hmm well, we do not interfere in their work. and, probably, this has never happened before, so that on the one hand there was e there was such a general patriotic mood. developmental countries and within our state and related to the maintenance of our interests outside, at the same time, we provide complete freedom, e to their activities. hmm. and such a relationship is such a situation. it seems to me that it brings the desired result.

well, remove rakhimov kubatrakhinov, kyrgyz republic dear vladimir vladimirovich russia is indeed definitely the leader of the new anti-colonial movement, also around the world, a wide response is received by russia's adherence to traditional conservative prices, but over time work of our valdai club. we saw a very serious request for social justice at the fair organization of public relations. how do you see it? how could the experts of the valdai club be useful? this is my first question and second question. and how do you assess the prospects for moving the capital of the russian federation to the center of the country, in fact, in the center of the eurasian continent in order to be closer to the countries of the shanghai

cooperation organization. thank you for a fairer arrangement social. social the device in russia, then according to the constitution of russia, we have a social state. and, of course, everything we do, all our national development goals, are dedicated specifically to solving social problems. here. eh, here we can say that e time even today will not be enough, everything that we do is aimed precisely at solving the social problems that the russian state faces. and we have a lot of them, including many unsolved problems. i already spoke about it. i repeat once again, so we need to, uh, develop economy, and on this basis to solve the issues of healthcare, education, technological development, change the structure of our economy, structural changes, the most important thing is that the labor market will change, and in this regard, of course, we must think about those people who

will be released from their old jobs. uh, one here, uh, experts of the most diverse sort out. e, the most different at the expert level we will be prompted by development trends in key areas. we would certainly be grateful, er, for in order to keep your opinion in mind when building our plans, considering. e, it means your position on these trends, about which i have just mentioned, because, understanding what will happen tomorrow, we can and should build a policy today e regarding the transfer. e capitals, yes such conversations, we have hmm we brought once in the capital means repeatedly. it was in russian history.