then there is no doubt, but a whole series of systemic errors. these are just those western authorities, about which i have already mentioned. and as we see now, uh, plus the destruction of pan-european gas pipelines. this is generally such transcendent things, but nevertheless we are witnessing these sad events, and the power over the world. uh, this is exactly what the so -called west has put on the line. uh in my game, but the game is definitely dangerous, well, bloody, and i would say dirty. it denies the sovereignty of countries and peoples, their originality and uniqueness do not put in any way that the interests of other states, in any case, if it is not directly said about denial, but in practice this is exactly what is carried out in life. eh, as if no one except those who formulate these very rules, about which i said have no right to original development, everyone else should. to be

combed under these very rules in this regard, let me remind you of russia's proposals to western partners to build confidence and build a system of collective security in december last year once again they were simply thrown aside, but in the modern world it is unlikely to sit out to sow the wind. as they say, the crisis will reap a storm, indeed, it has acquired a global character. it affects everyone. eh, there is no need to harbor any illusions in front of humanity now, in fact, there are two ways to either continue to accumulate a load of problems that will inevitably crush us all, or still try together. find a solution. though not ideal, but working capable of making our world more stable and safer. you know i always i believed and believe in this power of common sense, therefore i am convinced sooner or later by the center for a multipolar

world order and the west. we will have to start an equal conversation about our common future, and the sooner the better. of course, in this regard, i will outline some extremely important ones. ah, accents for all of us. today's events have relegated environmental problems to the background. oddly enough , i would like to start with this issue of climate change ceased to be, uh, in the first lines of the agenda, but these fundamental challenges. they haven't disappeared anywhere. don't share anywhere. they are only growing. one of the most dangerous consequences of the violation of the ecological balance is the reduction of biodiversity in nature. and now i ’m moving on to the main topic of the radio, which we all gathered, but is it important to think that another diversity is cultural, social, political , civilizational together. with that, simplification, the erasure

of all and any differences, have become almost the essence of the modern west. what is behind such simplification? first of all, it is the disappearance of creativity the potential of the west itself and the desire to contain blocking the free development of other civilizations. there is also a direct mercantile, of course. interest, imposing their values, consumer stereotypes unification and e unification hmm our opponents will call them so neatly, and hmm are trying to expand markets for their products. everything is very on the end on this track is primitive, and is it not by chance that the west claims what exactly? oh, culture and over worldview should be universal, but if it's straight and not it is said, although they also directly say to clean. eh, often, i mean, i don't directly say that's how they behave and behave. eh, and hmm insist that, in fact, as a matter

of fact, their politics insist that these very values ​​be unconditionally accepted by all other participants in international communication, quote from the famous harvard speech of alexander saviche solzhenitsyn back in 1978. he noted that the west is characterized by a continued quotation of a dazzling superiority. this is all happening so far, which the quote continues to support the notion that all vast areas on our planet should develop and evolve to the current western systems. seventy-eighth year yes, nothing has changed. over the past half century , this blindness, about which solzhenitsyn spoke frankly russian and not near-genial in nature, has already acquired simply ugly forms, especially after the so -called uh to the polar world arose, that i want to

say confidence in this uh in its infallibility. this is a very dangerous condition. one step away from her. before the desires of the infallible themselves are simply to destroy those whom they do not like, as they say to abolish. well , let's think about it, at least in the meaning of this word, even at the height of the cold war at the peak of the confrontation between the systems of ideology and military rivalry, it never even occurred to anyone to deny the very existence of the culture of the art of science of other peoples of their opponents. nobody even had to. yes , certain restrictions were imposed on educational scientific cultural and unfortunately, on sports connections, but nevertheless, both the soviet and american leaders of that time had enough understanding that the humanitarian sphere must be treated delicately. studying and respecting the opponent, sometimes something and borrowing from him, in order to

maintain, at least for the future, the basis for healthy fruitful relations . and now what is happening? at one time, the nazis reached the burning of books, and now western parents have slipped into the prohibitions of dostoevsky and tchaikovsky, the so-called culture of abolition of liberalism and progress, but in fact we have already talked about this many times, a real abolition of culture. uh, it mows down all living creative things and does not allow free thoughts to develop in any of the areas, either in the economy, or in politics , or in culture. the very liberal ideology. today has changed unrecognizable if originally classical liberalism. i understood the freedom of every person. how is the freedom to speak? whatever you want to do, whatever you want, then already in the twentieth century, and the liberals began to declare that the so-called open society. there are enemies, it turns out,

of an open society, there are enemies and the freedom of such enemies, can and should be limited, if not abolished. now they have reached the point of absurdity, when any alternative point of view is declared subversive propaganda and a threat to democracy. that's what does not come from russia. these are all the machinations of the kremlin, but look at yourself like that. really, we are so almighty that any criticism addressed to our opponents is perceived as the hand of the kremlin intrigues of the kremlin. well, this is some kind of nonsense. yes, what did they roll down? well, at least move your brains somehow more interesting to state your point vision. state it somehow, uh, conceptually, you can’t blame everything on uh, the kremlin’s nakosnik all this was prophetically predicted back in the 19th century by fyodor mikhailovich dastoevsky, one of the characters in his novel demons

, the nihilist shegalyov, and this is how he described the bright future he invented, a quote coming out of boundless freedom i conclude with boundless indifference. by the way, this is what our western opponents came to in his toilet, another character in the novel. peter verkhovensky, arguing, what is the need for widespread betrayal? evidence of espionage, that society does not need talents and higher abilities, and further cicero's tongue is cut off, copernicus' eyes are gouged out shakespeare is beaten by kaminii. well, this is what our western opponents come to, that this is not modern western culture. cancel. there were great thinkers, and uh. i am grateful, to be honest with my assistant who found these

quotes, what can you, what can you say? the history of putting everything will certainly put everything in its place and cancel, not the greatest, universally recognized works of universally recognized genius in world culture from those who today for some reason decided that it is in the right of this world culture to dispose of it at their own discretion. the self-conceit of such figures, what is called off scale? that's just their names in a few years, no one even remembers. and dostoevsky will live and tchaikovsky and pushkin no matter how anyone would like it, it was precisely on the unification of financial and technological monopolism, the rubbing of all and all sorts of differences , that the western model of globalization was not built. colonial in nature. the task was understandable to strengthen the unconditional dominance of the west in the world economy and politics. and for this, to put at the service of natural and financial

resources, intellectual personnel and economic opportunities of the entire planet to do this under the sauce of the so-called new global interdependence. here i would like to recall another russian philosopher alexander alexandrovich zino, whose centenary is on hmm centenary of his birth, whom we will celebrate just the other day 29 october, more than 20 years ago. he said that for the survival of western civilization at the level it has reached, it is necessary. there is also a quote, the whole planet is necessary as an environment of existence, all the resources of mankind are necessary, and they do not claim this one, it is. everything is just like that. and in this system. the west initially laid itself a huge head start, as he himself developed its principles and mechanisms. how are these very principles now, which are constantly repeated and hmm, which are an

incomprehensible black hole, what is it? none knows, but as soon as they began to benefit from globalization , not western countries, but other states, and above all, we are talking about the large states of asia, the west immediately changed or completely canceled many rules and illuminated so -called sacred principles. freedom of trade economic openness equal competition, even the right of ownership. all of a sudden, they completely forgot about it. how did something become profitable for yourself so immediately on the go, in the course of the game they change the rules or another example of the substitution of western concepts and meanings ideologists and politicians for many years have been saying and repeating to the whole world of democracy, there is no alternative. true speech. they were talking about the western liberal so -called model of democracy. everything else is all

other options and forms of democracy. they scornfully and i want to emphasize this through the lip, arrogantly rejected. this manner has been established for a long time since colonial times, everyone is considered second-class people, and they continue to be exceptional for centuries to this day. but today the absolute majority of the world community, as once and requires democracy in international affairs does not accept any form of authoritarian dictate of individual countries of a group of states, what is it? how do i directly apply the principles of democracy at the level of international relations, and what is the position of the civilized in quotation marks? the west if you are a democrat, you would seem to welcome such a natural desire for freedom of billions of people, but no, the west call it undermining the liberal order is based on the rules of gravity starts here economic trade wars sanctions

boycotts, color revolutions are preparing and carrying out various kinds of coups. here is one of them led to tragic consequences in ukraine in 2014. they even supported them. they said how much money this coup was selectively, in general, the hameles simply did not hesitate to take anything. here suleiman killed uh iranian. uh, you can relate to the sumani as you like, well, as you like, but this is an official of another state. killed on the territory of a third country to look for. yes, we killed what it is in general we where we live. and washington habit continues to call the current measures the order in american liberals, but in fact, every day this notorious order multiplies the chaos and i will add becomes more and more intolerant even in relation to the western countries themselves to their attempts to

show any independence. everything is suppressed in the bud directly and they impose more sanctions against their own allies without any hesitation, although they completely agree, we lower our heads. well , for example, the july proposals of the hungarian parliamentarians should be fixed in the eu treaty commitment to european christian values ​​and culture were perceived not even as a front. but as a direct hostile sabotage. what is this? well , how to understand it? well, some people might like it, some might not. in russia, for a thousand years, a unique culture of interaction between all world religions has developed. there is no need to cancel anything, not christian values, nor islamic non-jewish values, other world religions. at us are present it is necessary simply with respect to treat each other. and we have in e in a number of regions of the country. i just know it's not

hearsay. people go together to celebrate both christian islamic and buddhist jewish holidays and do it with pleasure, congratulate each other and rejoice from each other. but not here. why not? right? well, at least we discussed it. yes , all this without exaggeration, not even systemic from the doctrinal crisis of the neoliberal model of the american world order, they have no ideas of creating positive development. they simply have nothing to offer the world, except to save their dominance convinced real democracy in a multipolar world. first of all, it implies the possibility of any people. i want to emphasize this for any society of any civilization to choose its own path, its own socio-political system, if the united states has such a right, the eu countries, then the countries of asia certainly have it, the islamic states of the monarchy of the persian gulf, the states of other

continents, if, of course, and our country has russia and no one will ever be able to dictate to our people. what kind of society and on what principles do we must build a direct threat to the political economic ideological monopoly, the west in what the world may arise. creative public models are more effective, i want to emphasize this, more effective in today's day , brighter, more attractive than you are, but such models will definitely develop, this is inevitable. by the way, everyone should, by the way, and american political scientists are specialists. they write about it directly, although their authorities, those in power, do not really listen. although they cannot fail to see these ideas that are expressed on the pages, e political science magazines and in

discussions, it is necessary to develop development should go precisely in the dialogue of civilization, that is, reliance on spiritual and moral values, and different civilizations have a different understanding of human nature. it is only honest on the surface, only different, everyone recognizes the highest dignity and spiritual essence of man. and this is an extremely important common common foundation on which we can certainly build and must build our future, that here i want to emphasize traditional values ​​- this is not some kind of fixed set of postulates that everyone must adhere to. of course not, their difference from the so-called neoliberal values ​​is that in each case they are not repeatable, because they follow from the tradition of a particular

society, its culture and historical experience. therefore, traditional values ​​cannot be imposed on anyone; they must simply be respected with care for what each nation has chosen, uh, for centuries. chosen for centuries. every nation. this is our understanding of traditional values, and this approach shared and accepted by the majority of mankind. this is natural, because it is traditional societies. east latin america africa eurasia form the basis of world civilization, respect for the peculiarities of peoples and civilization in the interests of everyone in fact this interest and the so -called west losing supremacy. he is quickly becoming a minority on world time. uh, and of course the right of this western minority to their own cultural identity, i certainly want

to emphasize this, should be ensured relatively need to this to be sure. with respect, but i emphasize on an equal footing with the rights of everyone else, if the western elites believe that they can instill strange things into the minds of their people of their societies. in my opinion. well, newfangled trends, like dozens of genders and gay parades. so be it, assuming what they want, but uh, what they definitely have no right to. so it is to require others to follow in the same direction. we see that complex demographic political social processes are taking place in western countries. undoubtedly. this is their internal business. russia does not interfere in these issues and is not going to do so, unlike the west. we do not interfere in someone else's yard , but we hope that pragmatism will triumph and russia's dialogue with the genuine traditional west, as well as with other

equal centers of development, will become an important contribution to the construction multipolar world. i would like to add that multipolarity is a real, and in fact the only chance for the same europe to restore its political and economic subjectivity. well, what's wrong with hiding? we we all understand and also speak to europe about this directly. today, this is the legal personality of europe, to put it mildly, in order not to offend anyone, it is not very limited, by its nature. diverse, no attempt. the west to drive everyone under one template objectively, and the reasons nothing will come of it. an arrogant desire for world leadership, and, in fact, to dictate or maintain leadership through dictates. in fact, it turns into a decrease in international prestige or the leader of the western world, including the united states a

the growth of distrust of such agreements, the ability in general today they say one thing, tomorrow another documents are signed tomorrow they are refused. well , they do what they want, well, some kind of stability there is nothing at all, how do documents sign what to talk about? what can be hoped for completely incomprehensible? if earlier only a few countries allowed themselves to argue with the same america. it looked almost like a sensation, but now it is already commonplace when a variety of states deny washington his baseless requirements, despite the fact that he is still trying to put pressure on everyone. absolutely erroneous policy well, even if this is also their choice, i am convinced the peoples of the world will not turn a blind eye to the policy of

coercion, which has discredited itself and every time i forget for trying to maintain my hegemony, i will have to pay and pay more and more prices in the place of these elites, the west would seriously think about such a prospect just as they think about it, as i have already said, some political scientists, and politicians in the united states themselves states in the current conditions of a tough conflict, i will say directly to some things russia, being independent and original civilizations, has never considered and does not consider itself an enemy of the west americano phobia anglophobia francophobia germanophobia are the same forms of racism as russophobia and anti-semitism, however, like any manifestations of xenophobia . you just need to clearly understand that there are, as i said before, two west, at least two, and maybe more, but at least two west traditional, primarily christian

the values ​​of freedom of patriotism of the richest culture, but now islamic values, too, a significant part of the population of many western countries profess islam, this, the west is close to us in some ways, we have in many respects common even more ancient roots , but if the other west is aggressive , cosmopolitan, not near-animal, speakers, as an instrument of liberal lines , russia, of course, will never put up with the dictates of this west . well, here it is in 2000. after being elected president, i always faced something. and i will always remember this. remember what price we paid to destroy the terrorist nest in the north caucasus, which the west then almost openly supported here all adults most of you present in this hall understand what i'm talking about. we know that this is exactly

what happened in practice. financial political information support, well, we all survived it, moreover, not only actively supported the terrorists on the territory of russia, but also in many ways nurtured this threat. we know this and yet, after the stabilization of the situation, when the main gangs of terrorists were defeated, and thanks to the courage of the chechen people, we made the decision not to look back. do not build yourself offended to go ahead to build relationships even with those who actually worked against us to establish and develop relationships with everyone who wants it on the basis of mutual benefit and respect for each other, i thought these were common interests. russia, thank god, survived all the difficulties of that time, withstood, strengthened with

internal terrorism, the economy coped preserved began to develop defense capability. started to rise. we have tried to build relationships with both the leading parties in the west and nato. there is one message. let's stop being enemies. let's live together. let's have a dialogue to build trust, and hence the world. we were absolutely sincere, i want to emphasize this, we clearly understood the complexity of such a rapprochement, but we went for it. and what did we get? did you get a short answer? there is no possible cooperation in almost all main areas. got a steady growing pressure on us and the creation of hotbeds of tension within our borders and the purpose of allowing to ask this

pressure is what? well, what kind of training is so easy or what? well, of course not. the goal is to make russia more vulnerable, the goal is to turn russia into a tool to achieve their own geopolitical goals. strictly speaking, everyone is trying to turn this universal rule into a tool in order to use these tools for their own purposes. and those who do not submit to this pressure do not want to be like that sanctions against them are found as an instrument against them or all sorts of, uh, economic restrictions are carried out in the relationship. uh, it means that a coup is being prepared or where it is possible to carry out it. and so on and so on. and in the end, if nothing can be done at all, absolutely destroy it. it

has not been possible to brush off the political map and will never be able to deploy and implement such a scenario in relation to russia. what else i would like to add russia does not challenge or is there the west russia simply defends its right to exist free development, while we ourselves are not going to stop as a new hegemon. russia is not proposing to replace unipolarity with bipolarity of three, polarity and so on dominance. west dominance east north or south. this is inevitable, would lead to a new impasse. i want to quote here the words of the great russian philosopher nikolai yakovlevich danilevsky, who believed that progress does not consist in going in the same direction for everyone, as we are being pushed by a cute girl who is our opponent, and in this case progress would soon cease, says da nevsky, but in

proceeding more and more constituting the field of the historical activity of mankind in all directions, and he adds that not a single civilization. it cannot be proud that it represents the highest point of development. i am convinced that dictatorship can be countered only by the freedom of development of the country of peoples. degradation of personality love for a person as a creator primitive simplification by prohibition flourishing complexity of cultures and traditions civilizations, states and their integration associations really open up opportunities for their original democratic path of development, and above all, we believe that the new order should be based on the law and correctly be free, original and fair, so the

world economy and trade should become more fair and open russia considers it inevitable formation of new international financial platforms, including for the purposes of international settlements such platforms should be outside of national jurisdictions be safe to be politicized, but automated and not dependent on either a single control center, is it possible to do this or not? of course yes. it will take a lot of effort to unite the efforts of many countries, and to do this, it will eliminate the possibility of abuse. in the area of ​​the new global financial infrastructure. it will make it possible to efficiently and safely manage international transactions without the dollar and other so -called reserve currencies. especially since using the dollar as a weapon. uh, united states yes, and the west as a whole has discredited the institute of

international financial reserves. first, they were devalued due to inflation in the dollar and euro zones, and then tsap-tsarap pocketed all of our gold and foreign exchange reserves. the transition to settlements in national currencies will inevitably gain momentum. this, of course, depends on the level of wealth of the issuers of these currencies. the state of their economies. well, they will be strengthened and such calculations will certainly be, uh, such logic will gradually begin to dominate in a timely sovereign economic financial policy of the multipolar world further. today, the new centers of world development already have unique technologies and scientific developments in various fields. and in many areas they can successfully compete with western multinational companies, it is obvious that we, uh, have a common, quite pragmatic interest in an honest and open

scientific and technological exchange; together, everyone will benefit more than they should benefit individually . majority, not individual super-rich corporations and what is the situation today, if the west sells medicines to other countries, or hmm? uh, the seeds of food crops, they are ordered to kill the national pharmaceuticals and breeding. well, in fact, because in practice it all comes down to this, leaving machine tools and equipment ruining local engineering. you know, it’s worth it, but i’m still being the chairman of the government. i realized this is only hmm and open the market. for a specific for a specific product group, all local producers lay down and it is almost impossible to raise head to build a relationship in this way , the capture of markets and resources of the country is

deprived of its technological scientific potential. this is not progress, but enslavement reducing economies to a primitive level, technological development should not increase world inequality, but reduce it, this is how russia traditionally implements its foreign and technological policy well, for example, uh, by building nuclear power plants in other states. we create at the same time. there centers of competence train national personnel. we we are creating industries, we are not just building an enterprise, but we are creating an entire industry. in fact, we give other countries the opportunity to make a real breakthrough in their scientific and technological development, reduce inequality, bring their energy industry to a new level of efficiency and environmental friendliness, i will again emphasize sovereignty, original development in no way means isolation, e, authors, but, on

the contrary, involves active interaction and mutually beneficial cooperation us fair and equitable principles, if the liberal globalization, if liberal globalization is the depersonalization of the imposition of the western model on the whole world, then integration, on the contrary, is the disclosure of the potential of each civilization in the interests of the whole for the common benefit. if globalism is a dictate and this is what it all comes down to in the end, then integration is the joint development of common strategies that are beneficial to everyone. in this regard, russia considers it important to more actively launch mechanisms for creating large spaces built on cooperation with neighboring countries. whose economy social system resource base infrastructure complement each other such large spaces, in fact, is the basis of a multipolar world order. the economic basis of their dialogue

is the birth of the true unity of mankind , much more complex, original and multidimensional than in the simplified ideas of western ideologists well, some western regions. the only humanity is not built on command. do as i do , be as i do; in principle, long-term cooperation in a multipolar world can develop. in this regard. perhaps it is worth considering that the structure of the united nations, including its security councils, to a greater extent reflects precisely the diversity of world regions, because much more will depend on asia africa latin america in the world of tomorrow than is commonly believed today and such an increase in their influence definitely

a positive reminder that western civilization is not the only one even in our common in the eurasian space, moreover, the majority of the population is concentrated precisely in the east, where the centers of the most ancient civilizations of mankind , the value of eurasia is that this continent is a self-sufficient complex with gigantic resources of any kind and huge opportunities, and the harder we work to increase the connectivity of eurasia creation of new ways of forms of cooperation, especially impressive successes. we will strive for the successful operation of the eurasian economic union of the rapid growth of the authority and influence of the shanghai cooperation organization, large-scale initiatives within the framework of the one belt one road plans for multilateral cooperation to implement north-south transport corridors and many

other projects in this part of the world. sure. this is the beginning era of a new stage in development. integration projects here do not contradict, but mutually complement each other. of course, if they are carried out by neighboring countries in their own interests, and are not introduced by external forces in order to split the eurasian space and turn it into the zone of bloc confrontation , its western ending europe could also be a natural part of greater eurasia. but many of its leaders are hindered by the conviction that europeans are better than others, that it is not fitting for them to participate in some undertakings on an equal footing behind such arrogance. they somehow do not notice that they themselves have already become, in a foreign periphery, turned, in fact, into vassals. often without the right to vote dear colleagues the collapse

of the soviet union also destroyed the balance of geopolitical forces. the west felt like a winner and proclaimed unipolar minutes world order in which only his will, his culture, his interests had the right to exist. now this historical period of undivided domination. west in world affairs. ends up going back in time to polar world. we are at a historical frontier. ahead is probably the most dangerous unpredictable and at the same time important decade since the times. e the end of world war ii. the west is not able to single-handedly manage humanity, but is desperately trying to do it, and most of the peoples of the world no longer want to put up with this. this is the main contradiction of the new era, in the words of a classic , the situation, to a certain extent, the revolutionary top

cannot. they do not want to live like this, in the words of a classic. this state of affairs is fraught with global conflicts or a whole chain of conflict. e, what is a threat to humanity, including the west itself, to constructively and creatively resolve such a contradiction? this is the main thing today, today's historical task, the change of age is a painful, but natural and the inevitable future world order is being formed before our very eyes. and in this world order. we must listen to everyone and take into account every point of view. each people of the society culture each system of worldviews and gaia and religious ideas, without imposing a single truth on anyone, and only on this basis, understanding their responsibility for the fate of the fate of the peoples of the planet , build a symphony of human civilization. this is

where i would like to end with words of gratitude for the patience that you showed while listening to my message. thank you so much. transneft is not only the transportation of oil, it is a significant contribution to the development of the industrial potential of the country. factory electric motors develop and produce high-tech energy-efficient electric motors, unique design solutions and innovative approaches guarantee reliability and durability brother innovation of the future.

hello, this is my kindergarten. here i have many

friends and girlfriends diana is 4 years old. i know she has autism. i heard that she used to not know how to make friends. she didn't speak at all. she could not be put alone for a minute, but now everything is different obviously to receive a special program. she is learning to play with us. i'm on the cool diana my friend bare hearts create a free system of services for special children of their families. you can support the work of the foundation. help us help more.

we met exactly a year ago at that time . the atmosphere and the international situation were already quite tense. but of course, when we look at that october, from this it seems that there is simply the idyll has changed a lot in a year, literally the world has turned upside down, as some say. here for you personally, what has changed inside this year, i don’t know in your perception of the world of the country what has happened recently and is happening now , including, say, in the same ukrainian direction. this is not a change that is happening now or after.