and obstacles breathed out our fertilizers and agricultural products to world markets. we will take this into account when considering the advisability of extending the grain deal. and i would like to actually uh and pre-uh, the many questions that we get. and what will be the deal? hmm, what will happen to the russian part of this deal will be a deal. now, in principle, before the end of the term for which she was imprisoned, there is not much time left, literally a few days. and we once again state that the russian part is a transaction, and is carried out with such with fights that this performance cannot be considered full-fledged. we would like to remind once again about the application of our country to transfer about 300,000 tons of russian fertilizers to needy countries free of charge and supply them free of charge with up to a

hmm five hundred thousand tons of grain. , certainly. uh, the tragic events of ninety years ago. many historians see clear parallels in this, and i i can't stop talking about them now. e hmm, precisely based on the opinions of a large number of publicists of people who dealt with these issues based on documents. it was then that in the thirties of the last century, in the conditions of many years of crop failures and famine in the soviet union, western countries, hoping that the soviet union would abandon plans for industrialization, did not accept anything from soviet russia as payment for machine tools and equipment. besides grain. thus, they

became largely responsible for the fact that they received the name, which generally led to hunger, but in general a number of republics are now sovereign countries, but it is called a holodomor and in fact, the famine was e in a significant part of the territory of the soviet union, including e ukrainian ussr ural north caucasus volga kazakh ussr western siberia e, for political purposes this is now forgotten and, of course, is endowed only one side, and here is the right. and so to speak, consider yourself a victim of intentional, but malicious destruction of your own population by starvation or artificial famine. and for some reason the west also considered, perhaps, with such a side to appoint ukraine without thinking at all about where people died from, but throughout the soviet union

due to a number of complex reasons, which i mentioned, but not least, and in connection with the position of the west itself, you just need to know history , you need to be able to, but to overpower oneself in the sense that the political conjuncture is not always, but must prevail over historical memory. i mean , the west, we are still historical reality, but we adhere to m-m definitely and do it consciously today. west not hesitates to use food again as an instrument of pressure. isn't it. well, look, i will remind you again what we spoke about openly in public, but by providing not only our argumentation, but also the facts, after all. it was the british experts who were behind the training of those, and

the ukrainian forces, who committed the terrorist act, and just within the framework of this humanitarian project, which is carried out for the supply of chamois, and at the end of november, another anniversary will be celebrated in ukraine. what do they call the holodomor? which is trying to level the genocide. hmm, we sincerely recommend that kiev propagandists carefully study the history. documents to be convinced of the impartial role of uh in what was going on by their today's western curators continue the historical theme. i would like to draw attention. uh, besides, i just think it blew up public opinion. uh, how the kiev regime continues to be worn, and our monuments are ours i do not know our common history. yes, it's a story. uh, almost all the monuments of the soviet era, by the way, including the monuments to lenin

to which ukraine owes its statehood, on november 7 in odessa they got to the monument to empress catherine the great. well, what can i say more balls for mankurts. and how else to call people who demolish, by the way, saying they do. this is not the first time in its history. i am not kidding. for the first time they are demolishing a monument to catherine well, in the sense of monuments to the one who founded and laid this city, so to call it. and by the way, it is surprising that when conducting, that realizing a demolitions other monuments, in particular the soviet period, they do this hmm, as if declaring, rather, a commitment to decommunization. when they demolish the monument to catherine the great, they completely

repeat, and those steps, these actions that were taken by the communists they hated more than 100 years ago, must be revered. eh, bunin cursed days. he vividly describes the events of those years and what was happening around this monument. if you read this passage you will get the impression that you are now watching a report from odessa it is just so identical. by the way, there constant desecration, but the nazis exposed the monument to field marshal alexander vasilyevich suvorov. e. i wonder what it is for. e, it seems , does not fall under decommunization. am never been an emperor. uh, you need at least some kind of platform, so

to speak, to bring an ideological platform under your actions. well, they will probably come up with something for the nationalist regime in kiev , the facts confirming that the history of these places, in general, and the whole history of ukraine are inseparable from the russian one, and any attempts to rewrite it are doomed to failure. ah, well, another very important topic in the context of the situation around ukraine is a gross violation of international humanitarian law, and in fact, terrorism is the ongoing shelling by the armed forces of ukraine of the territory of russia from the rocket system of the hall on fire and the use of prohibited antipedic mines against the civilian population petal the very ones that he showed. i mean the wreckage from them. hmm, the permanent representative demonstrated, and russia , with the organization of exchange nations, the lord is not a pension. uh, thousands of these dangerous devices are scattered using cluster munitions through the streets

of russian cities in the donbass. more than 80 civilians, including four children, were injured in the dpr alone, and, as it were, to emphasize the use. these very petals are a violation of the ratified ukraine in 2005 from the 1997 tsarist convention. on the prohibition of anti-personnel mines, as well as the second protocol to the geneva convention on conventional weapons, which prohibits mines without self-destructors. and of course, they are outraged that the numerous appeals of the dpr leadership to the international criminal court on these facts remain unanswered. the assistance of westerners to the international criminal court in the ukrainian direction is an example of selective politicized justice or lack of justice, in principle. the refusal of the prosecutor of the court to consider in detail the numerous evidence of

kia war crimes in the donbass transferred to his office by the authorities of the dpr , as well as by the affected persons and human rights activists organizations. but this is generally one more thing, and there the evidence is 8 long years. we waited absolutely in vain, when the struggle of impunity will begin in ukraine, and unfortunately, it is not necessary to count on justice from the international criminal court of other politicized international institutions. ah, and one more topic. and also in the context of the situation, uh, about which i spoke, we consider the decision of the national assembly of the republic of bulgaria to provide military and military-technical support to ukraine as another an unfriendly attack on our country, which will lead to further degradation without being in a deplorable state of bilateral relations. now the responsibility for delaying the escalation of the conflict. there are thousands

of victims in ukraine. among the civilian population, the destruction of civilian infrastructure and the couple's safety in europe falls to the fullest. and on sofia, we are convinced that bulgarian lawmakers are aware of the facts of illegal trafficking in weapons, including those coming from abroad in ukraine-controlled territories and cannot but be aware of the threat of it falling into the hands of tourist groups and the formation bank in numerous hot spots around the world. well, the situation in europe i hope, but sofia knows from european sources, unfortunately. that this fact factor also remained unaccounted for? well, i would also like to say about the attempts of a number of countries that are not friendly countries to create a qualified legal mechanism for the use of ukraine and the so-called frozen russian assets as resources for receiving reparations from our country. and here is a row countries has been trying to create for a long time, a similar kind of

tool. in order to get their hands on what they call frozen assets, in fact , it is practically stolen from them at the moment . the west is actively trying to promote this initiative on the platform of the united nations, having developed the relevant resolutions of the general assembly, and we are removing it as they plan on november 14, the goal is to hold russia accountable for the alleged violation of international law in ukraine, including human rights. norms. well, i would like to immediately disappoint and put the authors of these initiatives in their place. firstly, their only task is to get from the general assembly. a political blessing on circumventing the norms of international and national law, in particular, aimed at protecting the property of foreign states and spending illegally frozen non-playing countries of russian foreign exchange assets, the latter must be clearly understood, this will become a gross violation of state immunity and the principles of

sovereign equality of the state speech in essence goes. according to a banal robbery, as i was once told, and illegally, the seized russian financial resources will be used for a very specific purpose, financing the american military-industrial complex. and this, by and large , no one hides another matter, which, perhaps, is convenient to turn away or pretend that hmm, as i was recently told by one representative of a european state. you ca n’t even imagine what a hmm degree of politicization is around, so don’t think that we are voting against russia, we are voting just to ourselves secure. well, with such a position, the international community or a separate one persecuted cannot secure itself. they can only contribute to more politicization. uh,

secondly, i would like to remind you that the resolution of the general assembly is purely advisory in nature, so let's return to the first point. this is for political cover. uh, the resolution of the general assembly imposes any legal obligations on the member states of the un and in fact. in principle, it is not entitled to establish the responsibility of states and third. we have repeatedly warned the international community and we repeat it again. if such a precedent with the robbery of russian assets is created tomorrow in our place. it could be anyone else. unsuitable for the state of washington, there were a huge number of examples to freeze funds ; and uh, also on the mentioned topic, the official

representative of the government of the frg recently spoke here first deputy spokesperson for the government of the frg a christiane hoffman a. but her performance is quite indicative, i pay attention to it, because we hear a lot of such statements, but here she did. uh, similar remarks on the seventh of november, which we would like to categorically, a reject and refute so. there she is. uh, hmm, during a government press conference, she shared her thoughts on the subject of absence. how did she formulate the readiness of the russian side for negotiations with the kiev regime, which, uh, this readiness from her point of view and supposedly demonstrates. well, it's about time anyway. i feel like i'm coming back to reality. you have repeatedly explained at various levels the topic of who, probably, does not have access, but to the internet. well, then we will continue to explain our position, in general

, everything that happens, russia's readiness for negotiations remains unchanged. we see that for many, in particular in germany, our words, apparently, somehow do not reach. they do not perceive them, maybe, uh, this problem of the german media, which is very selective, always manages with information instead of using its influence on just the kiev regime, the german side, contrary to its own laws on the rules prohibiting the export of lethal weapons and to crisis regions and zones of armed conflicts, continues to pump the kiev regime with various weapons systems. actually, thereby, encouraging him to continue hostilities at any cost. what steps indicate that berlin is acting in line with the instructions of the high representative of the eu for foreign affairs of the security policy of the barrel, and search for a solution to the conflict, as he said on the battlefield, as well as

the consensus that has developed in euro-atlantic circles to drag it out by all means. moreover, the consensus is so-so, in general, they achieve such consensus. by force, the anglo-saxon hmm elder brothers, would also like to note that the withdrawal of e ukraine with the supply of western partners was carried out in the spring. e, in general, the progressive mode of the negotiation process, as well as introduced by the kiev regime at the legislative level. probably in berlin they should still be aware of this information, e ban to dialogue with russia and also, voiced by the ukrainians, but by the leaders and completely out of touch with life conditions. as they said, the resumption of negotiations confirms the loss by the kiev regime and, accordingly, its curators in the west of an elementary sense of reality. therefore, all this must be somehow connected in germany with the

german representatives. well, maybe read something and stop making, uh, misleading statements. let me emphasize once again that this should happen once again, somehow, probably, well, at least, we hope consciously partners, of course, now i put this word in quotation marks, and we are still open to negotiations. we never gave up on them. we are ready to conduct them, of course , taking into account the realities that are emerging at the moment. we are coming to another topical international agenda, but i cannot but say again the philosophies of the united states of america despite the approval by the first committee of the general assembly and in early november of the american draft resolution on testing destructive direct ascension anti-satellite missiles our relations this initiative has not undergone any changes

, we consider the moratoriums announced by the white house in april on testing a dented type of anti-satellite weapons as a purely declarative step, as we have already emphasized earlier, some statements and a draft resolution of the general assembly are clearly not enough to prevent an arms race in space, especially for a country that has been since 2008, but hmm has experience in destroying space objects with means, but with anti-satellite weapons. the fact is that washington is so slyly silent, worth answering the question. whether they are ready to forever exclude the combat use of this type of weapon is a simple question. the texts of the resolution, by the way , do not say a word about this. no, there are no obligations regarding the development and production of such systems, the prospects for destroying the pentagon’s already accumulated, and moreover, anti-satellite potential, moreover, the

possibility of deploying funds, and anti-satellite weapons on the american reusable unmanned space shuttle x37b, which is capable of being on orbit and perform maneuvers, as well as carry a certain load. by the way, our multiple requests, but addressed to the united states of america regarding the clarification of the goals of the tasks that are being worked out on the x37b platform. e, remains unanswered very indicative in terms of understanding the true aspirations. e washington is clearly fixed in the doctrinal documents of the united states installations for military dominance and superiority in space. we have repeatedly commented on these documents and the perception of outer space. like arenas of confrontation also plans for their implementation, this is precisely the reason why the american delegation at the geneva disarmament conference is using all its might to

prevent the launch of negotiations on a multilateral instrument containing reliable hmm international legal guarantees against the deployment in space, weapons of any kind of renunciation of the use of force or threat of force against space objects under pretexts, the americans are evading work on the russian chinese project e-treaty aimed at solving e, the relevant tasks, namely the prevention arms race in outer space. well , actually, basically just trying to replace diplomatic efforts with unconvincing gestures to the public. well, so to speak, to sell another half-measure to the international community, the presentation of a moratorium on testing pso and no future initiatives as a us contribution to the development of a multilateral one looks especially cynical.