here is such a cruel person that he has an alien life polushka yes, and his own galushka a penny. this is an almost exact quote from our alexander sergeevich pushkin. e most from a water-loving writer. vladyka , you pay much attention in the series to the traitors of nicholas ii who were in his inner circle, to whom he trusted the most secret, even traitors. as it seems to you, there are many traitors. for putin, it all shows life. you know, i would not draw an analogy, after all, nikolai alexandrovich with all my love and reverence for him a and e of the current situation and the current ruler of russia. these are still completely different people , completely different people. but the fact that in the anamnesis we

have revolutions, riots supported by the west is one hundred percent we need to prepare for such diseases. this is the most dangerous thing there is. as a matter of fact, the revolution in the february revolution in russia, uh, it was created by the british. there is no longer any doubt about it. we were supposed to get uh on the results. uh, the first world war sex guardianship agreement was concluded in 15-16. and we had to get all the north, the coast, turkey part of the islands of the aegean sea, together with england, were to receive a protectorate over the holy land and huge indemnities from germany and e.

austria a. since our british partners, as they like to say now, they set their tasks to weaken the two countries in the first place. this is germany and russia, so they put forward an ultimatum to russia in order to minimize its preferences as a result of this war, which actually happened when they forced the provisional government to gradually abandon the treaty from the speech about nicholas ii sex to and from many many many more. that is, they simply did what the british wanted from us. well, it seems to be better inside, if the russian empire, which flourished in the thirteenth year, came to the fact that the ambassador of england comes to nicholas with a humiliating offer.

yes, to appoint an entente commander means the top commander of the general of the russian empire with the right to a decisive vote and that russia does nothing. uh did not undertake military relations without the decision of the allies. there was another humiliating point that rotten it asked uh war alekseevich soloukhin. well, if everything bloomed in the thirteenth year, if we are still equal to it , if there was a grandiose industry, the fourth fifth fourth in fact, the fourth in the world. uh, well, and so on, the elites rotted, which betrayed the national interests of russia, i say, now, as you understand, from 1917, here and uh. yes, what made the state say treason and

cowardice and deceit all around, what can be said about today's elites, elites that are pleasant and safe to scold. now the elites do not scold, only the lazy. but we don't have other elites. i think they will change as a result. here's what's happening now. we will have grandiose changes, just grandiose ones, and many of the elites will always or almost always not be at the level of their high calling. you can’t say anything here, and there is one thing we don’t like, the second is the third, the fourth is the fifth, but a significant part of the people who are now managing the country, well, in general, they work. maximum responsibly, you understand what the

trouble is. this is the seventeenth year, right? all the elites wanted only good for russia only now there is no doubt about that. and guchkov, who was the engine of the february coup and prince lvov , who became the first chairman of the provisional government and kirensky, who became the next chairman of the provisional government, and the generals demanded that nicholas ii abdicate for the good of russia and then saw what they had done to the intelligentsia, which, without pronouncing the name of nikolai and professor a e of moscow university, still left only to the criticism of their own government, the

most severe criticism and the state duma, which , in fact, participated in this collapse , everyone had a colossal hand in this, and with all their endless love for russia, they finally did that step by step that they handed over their beloved russia into their hands? a man who once said, and that russia does not give a damn about russia, the lord does not give a damn vladimir member in a conversation with an old bolshevik, comrade sal, therefore it should be not only love should be wisdom should to be an endless responsibility loyalty and devotion not to one’s own interests, but to the interests of the country, how would you comment on the criticism that russia lost the information war even

long before its end, i will explain the main claims that the state can not formulate the goals of a special military operations. some say that we are protecting the russian-speaking population of the eastern territories of ukraine and the orthodox leaders. they say that we protect in general we cleanse from satan. participation of ukraine medvedev generally wrote here that we are fighting the idea there. why when was the great patriotic war? well, somehow the goals were clear, understandable and they were formulated there, we drive the enemy from our land. what is the problem? honestly and frankly. honest frankness, honestly frankly, i'll tell you in our memory. in our genes, we remember this phrase by heart on june 22 , 1941 at 4:00 in the morning without declaring war, and

so on. we all have it inside, even children have it. but here the situation was different. here was a situation that for those who made the decision more infinitely more complex, you know, was such german. the genius of strategy of military strategy and the teacher of all modern war chiefs karl front-floor he was called, by the way, for some time a russian officer, he fought in 1812 in the thirteenth year in the russian army. well, i didn’t even know the russian language practically. so this is, well, like newton for, uh, physicists. yes, up to the military.

so i think that this is the expression of the st. petersburg underlings that if you know that a fight is inevitable, you must be the first. yes he has her expressed. eh, it’s different from the point of view of the military commander. the ruler who sees that an attack on his country is inevitable and does not dare to attack first is guilty against his country and his people. we remember the history of the composition, when we had a very fairly large grouping and it was clear that the war would begin. and here he is on the other side. ah, this is also an absolute axiom. i'm just thinking yes, but in 1812 it seems that bagration demanded that the state be the first to attack the french troops,

600 thousandth army of napoleon stood in prussia alexander refused. how did he explain it? very interesting. he said. yes, we can suffer a severe defeat, but if we come and we know that napoleon has gathered here in order to, uh, deal with russia, so to speak, and make her his political. but, if we attack us first in the eyes of europe, we will be the aggressors, they are the victims. and i don’t want to lose the status of a victim, and secondly, we will fight on the territory of prussia, which, even though it is an ally of the french, we will burn them fields, we will destroy their houses and so on, and we will also be aggressors towards them. and

if we go on the offensive after we were attacked, we will be liberators. there are different situations, you understand, you can’t solve everything under one tracing paper. this is a great terrible with nothing, incomparable responsibility of a person who makes a decision, and now critics of their own say so, we had to wait until they attack, then we would answer stalin the same to him in force. clear reason. they didn't say that, they didn't dare even the new bosses say the same, and the military is just a competent military. of course, listen, yes, how many millions of people have lost, but millions of people have not lost. due to the fact that, well, they didn't prevent it. you understand this attack, you and i are thinking about it. well, here are examples from history. well, you and i are not military men, and

we cannot have the right to vote here. it 's a prerogative. people who are professionally engaged in this, of course, they can all be wrong too. i'm not talking now, time will tell who was right who was wrong? what were the mistakes, how did these mistakes end? look, you've already mentioned this idea a couple of times. do you have to compare two rulers or leaders is a thankless task ; comparing wars is also a thankless task, because they all of them all operate here and now . you see, this is the very situation that has developed here and now. this is a completely different situation that has developed there 200 or 300. i have a question. what do you think, and in state pr to the parallel special war operations and the wars of the forty-first and forty fifth year. why, for example, was the

st. george ribbon chosen for the letter z, which is associated with or to the patriotic war? well, they would have chosen another or a tape, is this story correct? history is what reminds of the great patriotic war, well, of course, and stalin e in his time. ah, founded the order. nakhimov order kutuzov order. suvorov said his seminary words, brothers and sisters. no no. this is an epilation to the historical memory of the people here. it seems to me that this is not the case. here is your docu-series hmm fall of an empire russian lesson. in short, what is the stage and our country, our people learned it or not, what can be said today, there are many lessons, there are many lessons and that i am deeply convinced of all our misfortunes, this is orthodox. absolutely

as a constant position in our troubles, we ourselves are to blame for the situation, by the way, to say the president, whom we spoke today, he said that our fault is that we did not keep ukraine in all relations with russia that would be correct, good, constructive, good mutual respect, as i understand it, it seemed to you that the insane amounts that are sent to ukraine almost free of charge. well, that 's enough arrogance. here is our arrogance. there are certain spiritual laws; any arrogance ends in a fall. if you see this, some kind of misfortune, misfortune, fall. this is a sign that there would be problems in the world, the armor is strong and our tanks are fast. uh, let's not let anyone cross our borders.

remember the song of the soviet years before the military with little bloodshed in foreign territory. this was our slogan. small can repeat, small blood. i always listen to these things with horror, because it breeds pride, and pride breeds a fall. these are the spiritual laws taught by the church. but we won't learn it. unfortunately, these spiritual laws are also immutable, just like the law of universal gravitation , jump out of the window and you will see what will happen. believe, you or not believe in the law of universal gravitation. so any pride, any exaltation ends with this. we are now seeing an uplift. uh, that's the same for the unfortunate ukrainian people will receive and the wisest people, there are church people, and there are a lot of church people, they cannot help

but understand this. but even if they say this, i 'm sure that this is the same cheers for patriotism and a cap of denunciation, but they just don't let you hear it again. these voices about spiritual laws. unfortunately, in this sense, no one learns anything. as you think. what role did the church excavation play in current events in ukraine? if there was no church one can assume. right now, especially all these years, all all 30 years, of course, the forces that they tried to divide ukraine and russia on trifles or in a circle or in a not quite principled manner. they were doing it. we, unfortunately, looked at it lightly. they didn't support. everything that is creatively correct, which could be done

in hindsight, you understand the russian peasant, and where do they go, well, here in ukraine, what is there with him, we already have problems with uh, with some european strange ones. there is something else and so on, the economy is still the main thing right there. what was the significance of the schism? well, of course, had he shared divided divided and divided. our united russian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate, into which absolutely, naturally, harmoniously. on this, the ukrainian part was inseparably included. here they have achieved this separation. now the division is generally based on nationalities hatred of russia hatred of russian everything i now look at, uh, this is the same thing, maybe today, uh, they threw down a monument to alexander sergeyevich pushkin and is he, now

one of me asks man and what, uh, and potemkin were taken out taken out of kherson, of course, because it is clear what to do with the remains of darkness. it's not power. just his grave with the remains. and they moved it. that is, it is already, of course, scary, a painful abnormal pathological history with a pathological language. here we saw the typology, you understand, but they did not work properly, if they worked in the proper world, i don’t know how i have no answer. that was all good. you understand with the language the same these minsk agreements. well listen, well, what did you ask? we weren’t explaining anything, we’re the minsk agreements, which for 8 years have not been signed to ukraine also performed how to become during the russian-turkish war. what was the whole horror there, and the ottoman

empire signed the turks together with the european ones in paris, there was a conference signed after the crimean war , they signed an agreement that the slavs were equal in rights with the turks, they wrote something, well, it does nothing the same as on e, donetsk and luhansk signed that it will be an autonomous administration within ukraine and well, an autonomous direction. what is autonomy or merit? in e. canada is in such there are plenty of precedents that there will be a second official language russian, that they will not appoint western ukraine and directors to the school, but will choose from their own, russian-speaking and russian people, who they teach a lot of their own to sign, they generally signed. well, they didn't do anything. i understand that

they are not. they were forced. they were not free, but firstly, it’s rather hard to admit it, and secondly, the forces were painfully powerful, which raped them all this time in a private conversation. here are the members the drafters of the minsk agreements told me that , generally speaking, vladimir putin considered the text of these minsk agreements to be a severe defeat. tell me we've made terrible compromises. we are the regions that said, we are ready to go to you. we want to be with russia for the sake of peace, he says, okay, guys, but we will ensure your safety there today, but be in ukraine . well, now you can do it, we will communicate anyway, do everything and so on, of course, this is a defeat. of course, this is a terrible concession, but go on

there was nowhere else, what else if and and the worst thing is that the territory of ukraine remains and they ask for the same thing as in european countries from razlutoring and in canada well, nothing more, this is ordinary. eh, not at all terrible habitual. uh, international practice and domestic states. well, what to say? well , the tragedy is a disaster, you understand how it ends, and in any case there will be a tragedy. you said, because there will be a great tragedy, and then a loss, so that a victory will be a great tragedy, because he was killed by his own and still cannot come to his senses. here civil war. defeat is a defeat , you understand, because, as i understand it. we are not against the independence of ukraine at all. we are not opposed to them joining the eu, it is unpleasant for us,

but we cannot compete with the eu on the level of a disgusting word that has become just something to say with us. we cannot compare our comfort level with the european union. so, what is the difference between today's russia and today's ukraine? i don't think that one hundred percent of ukrainians support bandera's ideology, although many unfortunately, and this is a fascist ideology. i know many ukrainians who say that this is disgusting to us, but it is present and present officially and this, of course, is what is happening in relation to russians to russia to the russian language. this, of course, nazism here. no doubt. no, second. does ukraine, unlike us, have an ideology?

it's simple as a moo. but it works, ukraine europe so they looked, they visited and worked with one another in different ways in the european union and they said, we want to go there, we want to go there. we are no real alternatives. in addition to fraternal ties, they offered me, but over the past 8 years, these brother bonds have been torn more and more and more, and they say, we want integration into europe. they are not fools. they understand that a ukrainian will not become the first generation, uh, a very successful person, but they see that the turks have arrived. here come the pakistanis and in the third fourth generation. they become doctors successful

people, not all, but some of it is clear. so they say, but we, moreover, we are europeans, we are, uh, so to put it more mentally, they are connected with them and for them it has become an ideology. we like it or we don’t like it, they introduced entry into the european union into their constitution and the military doctrine, which means that they also included entry into nato into the constitution, and they introduced opposition to russia into the military doctrine, as they write, the liberation of the military liberation by any means, including the military and the re-annexation of the donbass and the crimea and we understand what it is these are military doctrines. this , too, must not be forgotten. here's what they did to us. you you understand, this is what these terrible overworld forces have done to us. you understand what is happening here, by the

way, about the ideology of the patriarch recently, and he raised it again. the topic that the thirteenth article of the constitution on the abolition of ideology needs to be abolished ideology in the country needs a question for you. and what it could be, you probably thought about it. i don’t know, you can’t suck ideology out of your finger and you can’t write it in offices. here they have this ideology ukraine c. europe, it has developed, people went to rallies and chanted it, you understand, we want to be like that. and as it began, it is an average stronghold of christian values. well, you know, it 's beautiful, in general it's beautiful. what feelings do you evoke feelings of pride in your fatherland and why does pride precede the fall, we do not need

a stronghold in our souls of christian values. here you are a stronghold of christian values ​​in your soul. yes, oh, you are also humble. you see how it is, and i am also humble. i'll also say no. so, that it is unworthy to say this, we must talk about ourselves. yes, today russia is doing a great job. it opposes the state scale, including the lgbt and the destruction of the family, and many many many other destructive brooms that come from the west to unite the people. it must include something completely different. it should include the future most attractive beautiful and in general real life. that's how much ukraine is europe. with the attitude towards ukrainians that i know, now before this military operation there were now and so

on. there are doubts. now, as he says, uh, one of the rediologists of today's ukraine, uh, ukrainians are greeted as gods. well, yes, insofar as. no, it was true in the early days. but that's all. eh, it all goes away. it all goes away and any normal person. he understands this very well, and from love, especially such an exalted one, to real hatred is one step. well, that's all, everything, this, so to speak, will be understood from their own personal experience over time. but let's remember the ideology of the bolsheviks that worked in our country, workers sit in the dark, wet, chew bread, lips turn blue from the cold, but lips whisper, vlad in 4 years there will be a garden city. remember mayakovsky, such a poem about novokuznetsk, that was, you understand, people

built a wonderful wonderful future for all , equality and so on. this idea captivates the future of ukraine in europe, which will help us, which will protect us, which will make us rich, which will make us french germans, there and so on and so on and so on, well, they are ukrainians, by the way, for their people very and rightly very good because of its national identity holding on. but in our country it should be born in the people to appear. when well, like the lord, but without it in any way. that will be the victory. what are those germs of nazism? germs of hatred, which we still objectively see, and sometimes trees, and sometimes just overgrown with a nightmare. they will be destroyed,

this will be victory destroyed by evil, and people understand evil in their souls, and this is a common cause for both russia and ukraine absolutely. you know what amazes me. and what i see now in our pskov division, many come from the theater of operations. i don't i saw not a single blazing hatred for ukrainians. well, sometimes it happens there that ukrainians will say something else , but the hatred of disabled people is disabled. for the rest of their lives they don't have any no, eat. this just amazes me when you look, huh? some reports and statements from the other side and you know

us very often now scold the russian orthodox church, that and where are the fruits of this spiritual revival? temples, but it's just a building yes departments, there and so on and so forth. this is a superficial view, but here are the real fruits of it. spiritual rebirth. here are the guys. without any hatred and with grief with sadness, speaking of the military labor that they happened to carry. no hate. here i testify to this with my priestly conscience i have never seen it. maybe there is, of course, somewhere, maybe there is someone. well, i've never seen it. this is what just inspires me, just inspires me, and this is it.