show me a byte that you can't figure out where it is, what it is. what is it, in general, about. first i'm heading to cairo for environmental efforts, then i'm going to colombia, just thinking. all as chairman of the osian, then he really got better too. although for some reason our video

hung up and said that after all, cambodia colombia cambodia starts on ko and something else how to spell cancer or iran yes, the truth is one on ko the other on k. i'm not surprised because i finished american school. i remember being the latin teacher at my school, who was considered the most educated person in the school because he had been in a europe of amazing education by their standards of a man. he once asked me to write the alphabet on the blackboard, and this is the twelfth grade of the school, the last of my classmates are 18-19-20 years old, and i wrote the russian alphabet on the blackboard and the class was shocked that there were other alphabets in the world. think about it, i'm not joking and not exaggerating, it didn't occur to them that there are other alphabets in the world, and they didn't change much. with the passage of life and college will not give anything. this does not surprise me. britain is still different. so

in this book he is so restrained, as always with the british, restrained, but still we hide it badly. disgust describes chinese babies. in several chapters. and there, his heroes deal with chinese babies. he describes this not with the words of the heroes, but with his own, that they looked so terrible. here they are, yellowish narrow-eyed, and he has such a phrase that killed me. i just read this at night and i'm shocked was. i think it’s imperative to tell the public who didn’t read this that they seemed not even very human. pomylsnot human he wrote verbatim, you know, and this, by the way, is the 20th century. by the way, everyone already understands this civilization. this is e book. he wrote in the twenty-fifth, or something, in the twenty-sixth year, but that's okay, let's say in the twenty-fifth year of the twenty-sixth year

, we already always proceed from the context, the context was different. yes, when there was slavery and tom and jefferson wrote to freedom for everyone and at the same time owned slaves. well, it seems like the context was different. they were not completely human to him. well, now in 2006, a film based on this book is released in 2006 based on this book. now imagine, if you weren’t talking about the chinese, but blacks, can you imagine that in 2006 a film based on this book was released, it’s impossible sommerset mine, it would be banned in all educational institutions, especially since no one would ever write a script for it books. no hollywood would ever agree to give money for this, not a single actress would go there to play. it would be a universal scandal. he would have been struck out for cancillin. as you can say from everywhere, but these are chinese, chinese babies are almost not people. nobody even noticed this and the screenwriter who read this book and remade it into a script, the director and producers. they do not see this, because they are chinese, because, as he wrote, they were torn off. all animals are equal, some animals are more equal than others

in this sense as well. every time i see such things, i am amazed at how much we ourselves do not even realize how historical. we are more open, oddly enough, you will show the rest of the world more tolerant, tolerant and devoid of prejudices than they all have been with us long before somers. it was my pleasure to be peter the great who had an incredible impact. i think so. this is my personal conviction. no one will dissuade me that he had an incredible impact on russian history and russian culture. why because, firstly, as we know, he was the great-grandfather of alexander pushkin who, in fact, created the great russian literature in the form in which it has existed since then and in in the form in which it did not exist before him, and, secondly, he dissuaded. eh, parents. suvorov not to let the boy into military service and persuaded them to let

him go there, that is, in a sense, he is the author of 40, that is, in a sense, he is the author of the greatest figure in our russian culture and the greatest figure in our russian. the statehood of military science and everything else is a black prisoner you can imagine it with them. when at the beginning of the 20th century, an intelligence officer and a great english writer, i love him very much. as the writer, by the way, looks with disgust at chinese babies, who seem to him, well, in fact, not people to imagine that the most ridiculous thing is impossible for himself. now i am discussing the law of lgbt yes. the funny thing is that in lgbt the situation is about the same, because the same pushkin describes his journey as what is now called transgenders. then it was called a hermaphrodite. he describes it. and no problems and no one is surprised that this happens. and i also want to remind you of such a girl, the hope of a fool,

who was born a girl, but no one read her as a girl, and above all, the girl did not consider herself she herself, because after all, it happens in life that they are now trying to impose on us and the whole world this artificial inflation of this problem, but this is not means problems. no. i always try to avoid extremes, people are indeed born who are yes yes ornate. yes, a cavalry girl, she is a prototype. all, probably, our viewers know the famous hussar ballad. remember so. well, she actually existed. she really is, because she had a very cruel mother, who generally threw her out of the carriage window as a baby and always raised her later in the sense that a woman is not worth living, because a woman will be born. this means slavery and so on and so forth, so she, apparently, somehow influenced her psyche, that she, like herself, then wrote all her life trying to get rid of the slavery of her sex and wanted to be a man.

after her mother threw her out of the window, her father handed her over to his batman for education, he, accordingly, brought her up with checkers there with horses and other, she went to serve in the army. there she was forced to hide at her place; the daughter of some general fell in love there. and gene was indignant. why does he not propose to his daughter this cavalryman. and he was her, in general, all this surfaced. and what did our tsar alexander i, he imbued and allowed her to continue to serve and she served well, she said call herself alexander alexandrov and not what kind of nadezhda durova, when even when she got married, he gave her away. then the truth left her husband. naturally, when the already grown son wrote to her letters and contacted her. she told him, if you will write to me, well, she is in the feminine sense mom mom, as if resting relatively speaking, she said that i simply will not answer you. well, this is not tolerance, so from the beginning of the 19th century for a second for a second, when we have konstantin constanter romanov, our great poet is also. eh, the grandson of nicholas i was. well, gay, he was like

tchaikovsky e, when our poet mikhail kuzmin wrote e, a story or a novel of wings? well, absolutely such an absolutely gay novel, what else can you say? read it, i read it. he absolutely absolutely game will be banned. i don't know it's forbidden. this is part of russian culture from mikhail kuzmin this is a great russian poet poet of the silver age. understood, so this novel was published in 1905 openly by issner, about the same time that they planted their great oscar wilde, for the same thing, without any novel. just for his private personal hidden from all lives. he did not have sex in trafalgar square anywhere else, and unlike our mikhail kuzmin, he did not described. it is never detailed in his novels, however. he was imprisoned and they teach us tolerance. why is all this happening, because

at the basis of their attitude towards us towards themselves towards the rest of the world of the same colonialism and everything that is happening now is their indestructible hypocrite. and this is the main reason. why do they all infuriate me with hypocrisy like this. we, if we do something, we go out and talk. yes, we do this because we are fighting, but for the fifth or tenth, we really fight for him exactly for what we say that we are we fight, but they always name other values, other goals, other ideals, which they themselves do not correspond to at all. hypocrisy is very annoying and we will fight them to the last projectile, which i hope we will never run out of advertising.

who is here? i know exactly morozov's toilet, do you understand what exactly? i say, i mean, ninety-three. and now we have completely met each other. yes, yes, on the eve or immediately after it doesn’t matter, then the meaning is that there, but there were his ears with bulatov whose advisor. i would be like, well, all sorts of very nice people who there behind him managed affairs there or there, and the secretary there or the administration. well, there was a big machine. so people were

good at some point, they blocked the ears, there was water, as if sewerage and electricity and barbed wire was around this white house. here, well, all the candles went. uh, it's kind of cold, and the toilets are in such an unappetizing state, of course, yes, at that time very good people told me about their relationship with the goat. i won such and such it was two hardware employees, because i would have you boss for 3 hours and 50 minutes, and such and such it was 2 hours. that is, the inertia of the existence of the hardware that existed in the previous era, and it ignored all reality. it was an absolutely inertial running program that exists in consciousness. and within this program, those processes that worked in the

previous life continued to work. they can't stop right away. yes, i agree this process was important. how long was the chief in the office. yes? uh, as if reality was throwing it out completely. the toilets don't work. uh, it's cold in the coat. e, in short, they do not have this reality, but there are bosses, the hardware game is stable, although at this moment. it would have to cancel yes. so, sometimes it seems to me that of course, none of these comparisons have a direct meaning, but the inertia of a certain perception of the existing, which has been formed over a long time and the inertia of life. eh, like a genre of style. uh, like the agenda and everything , it is saved at this moment, when like reality would change. come on, here we are, this very regrettable episode of kherson yes, we will

equate it there, i don’t know, to turning off the sewerage system or to something, but the inertia is such that we continue to do it all the way it was, well, my grandfathers shot me. since the thirty-seventh year. he was an officer in the first world war, but this also says that there, well, someone comes to the inspection, the next one says. well, what kind of soldiers are here? well, what are you, the heroes of the suvorov bogatyrs and everything else is no longer nearby, the supply of ammunition. there is nothing else. why not? what is this bogatyrs miracle bogatyrs of course. the question is not, uh, what kind of wonderful people we have and how many of them. yes, of course, there are many of them, of course they are wonderful. of course, we consider them the best in the world, but this does not mean that the whole reality that exists is able to do something. this is the reality that has been built. it does not withstand the loads that exist, it

does not withstand them, if at first an expeditionary force was created, and then they began to say so e to carry out partial mobilization, that means, at the moment when this expressive corps was planned and, as it were, sent to ukraine, it was considered true. otherwise, this mobilization would have been announced immediately, if after 2 weeks or a month they read that he was no longer coping, yes, then all the infrastructures for preparing people for modern warfare would not have been in separately taken places, where separately taken wonderful people work, but everywhere. everywhere, but it was not prepared for this, right? well, that's for sure fact, yes, in general, the question begins to the media. well, let's say we're discussing something now. after all, this discussion will be

perceived differently, though everywhere. we cannot understand. eh, as if the laws of perception of what is happening. so, as if in the conditions of which, so to speak, something extremely pernicious happened. yes , what, well, strange information, as it were. well, yes, if we do not discuss it, then who will discuss it. this will discuss our enemies correctly and then all assessments of what is happening will be are given. here is the most basic way. how do you say yes? everything is over, there zelensky will bathe in the crimea there and so on and so forth is true, but in order for it to be not so different, such as the discussion must recognize this gorky truth. he must uncover its anatomy, he must understand what exactly is going on, he must find its sources. and after that, this situation should be corrected in the way that can be corrected, really, if everything is so wonderful, why

the hell are we retreating from the territory that is already part of the russian federation, so everything is not so wonderful. this does not mean that everything is as monstrous as the ukrainian enemy wants to impose on foreign media hysterics, idiots who here howl like dogs from every episode. it doesn't mean that it is. well , this does not mean that it is wonderful, though, and every time it will be said how wonderful it is. this will play along with the safe. bastards and all the wickedness that will howl. how terrible it is, because everyone understands that this is not great. yes, they accept, but they cannot but understand. so, then a lot of questions arise in connection with this situation, you understand, these are very deep questions, because these questions are about

how russia can live in the situation that has arisen and to what extent this situation is historically repeated. we are not a prosperous country. we are simply territorially disadvantaged , this is not called comfortable placement of the territory. we can keep this state , our beloved for us, infinitely dear, only at the cost of extraordinary efforts. it is like that with us there are people around who are neighbors, so to speak, who look with your appetite at our territory, everything that we have. we have a low population density, and so on and so forth, damn it, there are not so many of us now, we are all the time used to having so many of us, as it was in the russian empire or in the soviet union, but this does not mean, is there a situation such as this has already arisen means the effort and way of life that exists

must be extraordinary. we won’t be able to stand the whole thing otherwise , which is hindered, firstly, by inertia. we we still live the same, yes, we live under ourselves without smelling war. he spoke countries and disasters. but she turns around. this is the first second, these same people, about whom he speaks, showed their wrong side. yes, they didn’t show who they are, they removed this hypocrisy for a while, and we saw this hating grin. what is the nature of this rock besides the fact that everything was always bad. it's racial theories, that's all. the rest is what it is. uh, the invention of the anglo-saxons. they are hitler. what else existed? and the fact that after the war in order to fight us it was not the inversion that they

proposed, yes, between the soviet union and the united states, but the convergence of the remnants of the nazi reich and the united states of america, the real operator of this convergence, of course, was wernher von braun, but there was someone to carry it out and a colossal role within it all played, of course, the ukrainians. here is the ukrainian diaspora. she created all these laws about enslaved peoples, yes, which to which people there was no place in russian, because he, as a people the enslaver correctly created this entire league of anti-communism and everything else that only existed, and inside it all, real nazism was already nurtured . really. hello i came this is the fourth reich. it exists, it has not yet

been finalized, there are a lot of hedonisms from all sorts of whims and everything else and all these things. well, rome was also completely corrupt god knows what, but that does not mean hating this depraved rome, mithridates could not, nevertheless, figure it out so as not to become this mithridates. and why was mithridates especially hated for rome. he was hated because he was his own. he was not a barbarian. it wasn't the germans or anything else, it was the greeks, for whom they hated much more the romans than any barbarian peoples. so they treat us like the greeks and there is every reason for this in russian history with orthodoxy content and everything else means in order to understand this rome and see. him. one must see its duality, its pity, capriciousness, perversity, and in its

merciless strength. and he must be truly hated the way, for example, a cuban is hated. they know what he is they he showed them his face, not like he was hypocritical here all the time. how long have you loved otrim? how long did you sing? oh-oh-oh-oh-oh american dear , how long did they try before him, how long have i seen our largest oligarchs, who were talking like a loafer when the canopy was sitting in the hall? what how much was all this? how many years has this been going on? how it stuck into the blood and up to a certain part of the elite of a significant part and reduce everything here to the fifth colony is impossible, everything is worse, much worse, what was done. what is the place within this society, about which they said so we love them, we stroke them under them. we

focus on them. we are constantly learning from them. what place did the army occupy in this society? her place was in the backyard. because those who didn’t get there went there, i don’t know how pr bandits bureaucrats into something else, like businessmen. yes , further, what processes took place there, they took place in the process of obvious negative selection, as in the whole society. they may have been slower, but they were exactly the same. what was in this situation that margarita rightly condemns, they say that these are these victorious reports. this is the norm. this is the norm. this is a way of being. anyone preparing for a very big war? since 91 aha 98 years. yes,

the very doctrine of the possibility of a large conventional war was definitely cancelled. serdyukov put an end to this doctrine, finally his advisers. it was directly said at the security council that we would either exist in local conflicts, or there would immediately be a big nuclear war. i didn't hear it. i didn't hear it with my own ears. this had profound consequences. one of these consequences was that our science, our managerial military potential , was flawless in everything that concerned, for example, the interaction of military branches. this discipline has suddenly found itself in the margins, because it is the decisive cast of a major war. and

here it is, as it were, such a condensed usual big conventional war imposed on us, which for decades was excluded from the post-soviet military philosophy. it was not supposed to exist what is happening. now this is not that war, then the question arises of what happened to the technology. and i know what happened from the technique of the whole book happened. a wonderful thing, separate copies. the warrior is three plus, and the new ones are even more serious types of weapons, the exoskeleton is to sho the fifth tenth. this existed for small units that had to master it all. and, as it were, individual drones and tablets, where they were fighting and everything else existed. this was shown to him at all

sorts of, so to speak, military glamorous events, but this did not happen and it was not assumed that it would exist in large numbers and, by the way , it is not so easy to train a soldier of a three-plus ratio. not at all like that, it’s just that everything that followed from this kind of things would not be great confidential war. well, okay, we have an expeditionary force, our expeditionary force , so to speak, with his right hand with his left hand , he will scatter everyone, and what we got, what really you are talking about a certain hair dye in everything, but the bearing factories destroyed us, you hear me. thanks to belarus for keeping them, and we have no problems with that. i sincerely say, thank you, but it was necessary to be able to do this now . the soviet legacy of the military and the next generation.

i understand perfectly and do not want to absolutize this question is somewhere out there, someone takes some kind of ak-47, but already, when i was in the military training process with a specialty of 0.01, a motorized rifleman of the taman division received lieutenant shoulder straps in the seventy-second year, there was already km. and you remember that, there was no ak-47 ak-47 had to be armed. even then, after that, several types of weapons appeared. yes, there is an ak-74 and so on, then finally this whole ak-12 appeared, which became in service with the army. so it can't stand anything, it turned out not to be the right one. it is not enough in terms of production quantity, what is happening? you look there, what kind of helmets are there, far from all the helmets belong to the warrior, yes, which i see, these are other helmets. now these are all

private petty questions. what do they mean that the army was on the fence. you understand this society in which the army could not help but be on the backs and every time. and these are my friends whom i know, who and here again from the south of russia, yes and very poor families, they came through the sports company of the gru special forces and then from this gru special forces a graduated from the frunze academy of the general staff. went to study at the faculty of philosophy. wrote books of protection. these friends were thrown out of the army. and i saw how they lived before that. and i know how many staff officers live now, who also graduated from the academy of the general staff and everything else for a long time. it is possible, and why is it possible, but because the society has remained the one in which the army should be on the fence. so it is necessary to change society, to withdraw the army, to do colossal work about changing in russia and all

its components and through this work to win, because you can not lose absolutely agree. sergey ivanovich should note that fortunately your brilliant speech is heard and much is changing. we are probably not telling enough about this, but fortunately, a lot is changing and changing. so, that is, mikhalycha often hears in matters, by the way, both economics and management and what a special commission under the control of mishustin is doing, just now these systemic errors are being corrected, which you are talking about, but, when you talk about changing society, i subscribe undeniably. information needed alexander mikhailovich here. i would like to continue your thought, indeed, not only listen, not only hear, but also do. this means that i did not pay attention to the fact that recently the financial and economic bloc has finally entered into a discussion with those. who talks about the need for change during this time we listened to the minister of

finance, the central bank. and even the accounts chamber spoke out on issues related to economic processes. i personally have several moments, i'll tell you. just recently, the head of the central bank came to the state duma. we are waiting for her again. so she voiced such important words that you could not even imagine before that they would be voiced. well , the need to transform the economy, the need to return state guarantees, which were canceled by them, but now they assume their vision, right, because it is necessary to support. this reduces the amount of collateral when obtaining credit funds. all in all. words many correct things have been said.

dear friends, i want to offer you a mini-series of very small films that we made almost 30 years ago, i thought that