uh 60% to about asia and uh, about 40% to african countries. and finally, on health care, a called for intensifying international cooperation to increase preparedness for infectious diseases, including those similar to the coronavirus pandemic, and supported the efforts of the world health organization, as the main international structures for coordinating the response of the world community to these challenges in the field of healthcare in the field. threats to the planet's population supported the idea of ​​creation. e between the world the health organization and the world bank fund, which should deal specifically with the needs of developing countries in this area, we said, and er, the need to implement the c decisions

that vaccination should be in the public domain. we have given e examples that characterize the discrepancy between the real picture and the declared goals. particularly because of the gap in vaccination levels. uh, its level due to gaps in vaccination approaches, its level in developed countries is 60%, while developing about five in the poorest countries about five percent. and one more of our proposals was to abandon the monopolization of the pharmaceutical market in its pharmaceutical markets. we recalled that the russian sputnik vaccine was not the first vaccine developed, and despite the fact that its registration both through the world health organization and the european commission was artificially hampered, it proved. efficiency

over 95% and successfully delivered in 70 states and the last topic that in the context of healthcare sounded we touched on the problem biological security, primarily in the context of the military biological activity that the united states has deployed in dozens of countries under pentagon programs. in all regions of the world, especially in eurasia along the perimeter of the borders of the russian federation and the people's republic of china, they noted that our attempts to figure it out after all. what are these military biologists doing there, they encounter resistance both within the framework of the convention on the prohibition of biological weapons, and within the framework of the un security website where we this issue was raised recently, but we will continue to strive for the creation of an effective transference control mechanism, and for such

programs. so, well, there were a lot of short conversations with participants from various countries on the sidelines, i can tell you more about this later, if you're interested. and did you manage to write these uh general conventions? yes, that was discussed at the summit, that 20 e and to agree on all its points, if here in this document there is a mention of ukraine a and an acceptable reformulation of this document. you perhaps you mean not the convention, but the final declaration. yes, work on it is almost completed. and this document will be approved following the results of tomorrow's meeting, which will consider the topic of digitalization. anton silanov, minister of finance, will participate from us, uh, the declaration in question covers all

the areas that were discussed and food and energy, healthcare and digitalization. yes, our western colleagues tried in every possible way to make this declaration politicized and tried to to push through wording that would imply a condemnation of the actions of the russian federation on behalf of the entire g20, that is, including ourselves, we insisted that if you really want to touch this topic, although it in no way concerns the agenda and competence of the g20, then let's be honest . and let's record that on this topic, we have a difference. yes, there is a war in ukraine, a hybrid war that the west unleashed and which it has been preparing for many years, starting, uh, from the moment when supported the coming to power as a result of a coup d'etat of openly racist neo-nazi forces, and since then nato has been actively developing the territory of

ukraine, conducting exercises, supplying weapons. well, you know, when events developed further, including the sabotage of the minsk agreements and including the beginning of preparations for a military operation against donbass , therefore, the draft declaration contains a reference to the fact that an exchange of views took place. on these issues, the parties reaffirmed their positions, which were repeatedly stated in the organization of the united nations, including in the security council at the general assembly. in particular, when the last resolution of the general assembly was adopted, which was voted on, it was not unanimous and clearly confirmed that everyone had their own, uh, assessments that were set out there. the west added the phrase that here we are, many delegations condemned russia . alternative points

of view. we believe that this is quite enough, because it is deeply rooted in this topic. this is not at all, uh, not the case of a group of twenty. and here it is necessary to deal with specific issues to bring it back to normal. the state of the kiev regime so that it ceased to engage in the movement of russofian russian politics. i asked in my speech. let's say our western counterparts have either french. just like ukraine banned russian in all areas without exception, or what the uk would do if ireland banned english. there were no answers. you understand, but i think that, uh, if the west was so obsessed with their idea, uh, and tried, probably use. e. this is this entry in

order to frustrate the twenty to frustrate the adoption of the declaration, and then blame us for this, he did not succeed. channel one continues the topic and as a result, the united states managed to turn the g20 into such an operation, including a platform for changing the agenda ourselves, and that is what we were just talking about behind closed doors. during these boxes of meetings , we studied the opinion of the voices and countries that came, but really to discuss important issues and problems, you know, well, all the main work on all important issues on the agenda of the g20. it has been held in recent days at the level of experts at the ministerial level. and this work is reflected in its results , which are reflected in the substantive parts of the declaration. as far as the ukrainian topic is concerned, the united states is also their allies. during the discussions. uh, today uh, they

noted uh, quite aggressively, accusing russia uh, c. as they say, unprovoked aggression and against ukraine in general. you know, the more often they say unprovoked aggression, the more, probably, everyone is convinced that aggression is was provoked, just by them this is not aggression, but is an operation to protect the legitimate security interests of russia on the borders, which created a military threat to our country and is an operation to protect the russian population of donbass, you know what parallel came to mind. here we are before, when we gathered in the soviet union for party meetings. well, not even we are in the media, but let's say at some manufacturing

enterprise they are discussing the tasks of fulfilling the five-year plan , seemingly industrial topics, but it was a sign good manners before the start of the discussion be sure to stigmatize american imperialism. our western colleagues approach the agenda in approximately the same way. these planets, a, support, including those positions, and the construction of a multipolar world, which was voiced by vladimir putin at the valdai forum , it is clear that it is probably difficult to fight in the economic ebotomic connection as transnational corporations. yes, er cancel, so to speak, the global world, as support for the military, we can see in the framework of there joint exercises, like it happens diplomats that you are working here in the form of the g20 with someone to talk

and support and enlist here the information polemical field, and how it might look in the future? thank you well, actually, the answer is very simple . it is impossible not to touch on this topic, because the west makes it a priority, it is imperative that they throw in the ukrainian story in any discussion third world countries are calling for a peaceful settlement, but they are calling for an early agreement. well, they know perfectly well that ukraine is slowing down this process, and which, among other things, is legally indicated by zelensky, has banned negotiations with the russian federation, so these questions are not for us. and so, i actually said today during short conversations with president macron and with the chancellor. ah, your meeting, who was he

discussing, if there's a future grain deal, it's draining in a few days and hmm to what conditions russia is ready to renew the agreement on the export of grain? thank you, the conditions are very simple, they are all written in the original agreement, which had two parts, and both parts were approved in the package for the first export of ukrainian grain. it is carried out after the ukrainian armed forces used the humanitarian corridor to export grain for military purposes, we suspended the implementation of this operation, but then the ukrainians confirmed that they would not do it again. well , our turkish colleagues, yes, and western colleagues.

they have an understanding that they must keep ukraine from such unacceptable actions, the second part of the deal was the removal and obstacles to the export of russian grain. and here. uh, you have to give credit to the un secretariat personally to the secretary general. they try as best they can, but 5 months have passed. so far, by and large, practically no results have been achieved, but today at a meeting with the general sister, she spoke about the promises that, among other things, the united states and the european union conveyed to him on paper in they are, as it were, set out, but i would say, good intentions, if they are realized, then the obstacles on the way and the export of our grain fertilizers will be removed, but the whole point is not in the papers, but in how they will be carried out in practice, we are assured by the lips secretary general, and he refers back. eh

, my colleagues, that all economic operators that are involved in ensuring the supply chain of russian fertilizers and grains receive signals that reassure them. uh, in the sense that they will not be subject to sanctions if they become uh cooperate on the implementation of trade deals with our grain, including the entry of russian ships into european ports, including the seizure of strange ships in our ports, including ensuring the full operation of the russian agricultural bank and including, of course, ensuring normal insurance rates. eh, here are all the promises laid out. i hope that they will be fulfilled, at least the general station swore today that this is a priority issue for him. some type of

hospital, and as for my question, western partners, after all, there is a feeling that they have recently changed their rhetoric regarding relations with russia. but we are still beginning to hear such words as peace negotiations. now there are problems in the eu with the adoption of a new package of sanctions. eh, what caused such changes? and what can you expect thanks, you know, it's hard for me to judge. eh, alien soul darkness and especially the soul and the european union there are very thick about something, if they sometimes dispel, then not for long, therefore, as i said. today i had a brief conversation with president macron, who reaffirmed his intention to continue contacts with president putin in order to find some kind of agreements that would allow resolving the whole situation, as he put it, but i reminded him. about what i just told you, that all

the problems are on the ukrainian side, which categorically refuses any negotiations and puts forward conditions that are obviously not realistic and inadequate for this situation. good afternoon today jackal news agency satellite. ah, the european union has officially launched training mission for the russian military on its territory, this program provides for the training of 15,000 military personnel as a given solution. uh, you can affect the further development of the ukrainian crisis, and does the launch of this program make the european union finally thank the direct participants in the conflict in ukraine. well, i believe that the nato european union has long been a hybrid participant in the hybrid conflict of the hybrid war in ukraine, and this is the supply of weapons and training, the training of military personnel , this and uh, help in providing a huge

the amount of intelligence this involved in setting targets. as you know, the americans are doing this work of instructors on the ground, not to mention thousands of mercenaries, if you touch. the specific decision of the european union to launch this military training mission, then there is some kind of split consciousness going on, because in parallel with this, as i have already said president macron, chancellor schulz, other leaders of european countries are talking about the need to move to a peaceful settlement of such, you know, uh such political as i said split personality split or as president putin said eh? specific non-traditional forms of international relations, but we are getting used to it, uh, everything happens

. please tell me personally, do you see the west's signals to kiev about the resumption of peace negotiations with ukraine and, in my opinion, what should happen for them to finally stand, thank you. well, i can't walk in circles. we have repeatedly confirmed through the lips of the president that we do not refuse negotiations. and if anyone refuses, it's ukraine and the longer it will refuse, the more difficult it will be. here, in the end, to agree on signals to zelensky from the west, we consider various messages citing some anonymous sources. uh, rumors are circulating that the american administration seems to be telling zelensky to be talkative, then it is immediately clarified that this is not so that he really, uh, sits down constructively in order to remove uh objection uh from that part western world, which is beginning to doubt

the need to supply him with additional weapons from zelensky's speech, which was very interesting today at the meeting. uh, the chairman of the uh, the twenty decided to let him speak, the speech was recorded and lasted 20 minutes. although each participant was given e about 3 minutes so that everyone had time to speak, and zelensky spoke for 20 minutes. it was impossible to interrupt him, because it was a recording, apparently they did not want to turn off the recording, but from his speech. and i brought you not so much one conclusion that he is not listening to any, uh, western soviets yet. well, they won't relocate either. everything he said was russophobic military territory. aggressive, but best of all, the content of this speech and

the state of this man is characterized by his phrased, but pronounced, he said that the landing of the allies in normandy in 1944. became a turning point in world war ii draw your own conclusions. everyone answered my question, i would add today, somewhere, politics reported that the guests were preparing the ground for possible negotiations between russia and ukraine, and with the entry of winter cold weather. ah, working out some contacts in practical terms is already completely, please, please, a conversation with chavushogu, but no details. nobody on the other side was brought up. could you tell us what was discussed and whether a very close contact is being prepared with your shalom

. thank you for the message that supposedly the americans are preparing some kind of negotiations, these rumors constantly pop up, this is also with the same success, then they disappear. we are no longer responding to this. we want to see concrete evidence that the west is serious is interested in disciplining zelensky and explaining to him that this cannot continue, that this is not in the interests of the ukrainian people and themselves . regarding the conversation, where did we discuss the preparation of the final declaration of the g20, including the section on the grain deal. well, uh, about the exact contact with him, we do not plan it, because it just took place today. thank you thank you sergey lavrova in the fields

themselves there big twenty. hello, this is my kindergarten . here i have many friends and girlfriends. i don't four years. i know she has autism. i heard that she used to not know how to make friends. she didn't speak at all. she could not be left alone for a minute, she is learning to play with us and she is cool diana my friend naked hearts is creating a free system of services for special children and their families. you can support the work. help us help more. the un general assembly adopted a resolution on the creation of an international register of damage that was allegedly caused to ukraine, the resolution involves the creation of some mechanism for damages, but it is only

advisory in this topic. now we will discuss with us directly, because the speaker of the federation council konstantin kosachev konstantin iosifovich hello so you have already commented. this is the solution. ah. what do you think, how will you comment? the adoption of this resolution, whether it contradicts the charter and the norms of international law. there are legal situations when two lawyers have three opinions, but in this case it is a completely different story here . maybe only one sponsors initiator the authors of this resolution, but then its co-authors, that is, those countries that voted for a radical way by their actions violated both international law in general and the charter of the united nations in particular, which i mean, and paphos himself speaks of this resolution that it regulates. uh, issues related to peace and

security chapter seven of the charter of the united nations explicitly states that issues of peace and security are within the exclusive competence of the un security council, they are not belong to the competence of the general assembly of the general assembly when something seems important to it. in such cases, the right to draw the attention of the security councils to the relevant situations, but not decide not to take aside in certain disputes. moreover , uh, to develop some recommendations on the creation of mechanisms. this is the first. ah, moreover , in the same charter it is said that when the security council deals with the relevant issue. uh, then the general assembly, in principle, cannot discuss it, which, in fact, we observe right in the opposite genre there, because in security, of course, these issues are discussed almost daily, but, uh, the general nevertheless

interferes in this way in the work of the security council. this is the first side, so to speak, purely statutory legal second. when it comes to compensation. uh, some damage. perhaps this is the topic. uh, strictly, legally purely, if you want financial property compensation. anything else which means they must be involved, but quite obvious legal mechanisms for in order to establish the fact of damage, the amount of damage caused, the extent of compensation. well , of course, uh, the responsibility of the parties to the conflict is to compensate for this damage, and for this, the charters provide for it, an appropriate mechanism for clarifying interstate disputes. this is the international court of justice, as it is, it is recognized by all state members of the united nations and, of course, appropriate appeals should go to it. i remind you that let's say, uh, there was a consideration of esca nicaragua v. usa and

by the way, the americans lost this risk. well, the lawsuit was considered by an international court. it is with the consent of both parties. that is, here, uh, the competence of the international court should be involved - this is the first and there should be the consent of the parties that are involved in the dispute to ensure that the international court is considered in accordance. until now, the un general assembly has not even mentioned this mechanism. well, and finally, the third. it is clear why this is done. this is done in order to bring at least some e, at least such illusory, but, nevertheless, a reference legal basis for the subsequent actions of the collective west, it is clear that it will not be about africa, abaza and latin america - this is the western hemisphere. this is the western contingent. this nato space is for those states that are going not just to block, but to confiscate russian assets in this part of the world. and then to turn them in favor of ukraine, we are talking about

directly affecting the immunities of our immunities as a state, because we are talking about state assets. i will remind you and everyone viewers that there is a united nations convention on the jurisdictional immunities of the state and their property, which such actions do not allow. well, of course, there are a huge number of international legal acts already outside the charter of the united nations that say the same thing that, without the consent of the state, its assets, whether it be dip property, whether it is financial holdings. whether then any other assets to be seized. moreover, they cannot be removed. that's all this is by the authors and with the authors of the resolution general assembly he er in the most radical way was yesterday. eh, violated not respected. uh, collapsed even i would say, and therefore from the point of view of uh legal technique and from the point of view of political

meaning, the significance of this resolution, alas, is negligible. well, or uh, fortunately for the united nations, not alas. probably because, after all, the united nations must maintain its authority. even in these difficult circumstances, when she is openly framed by konstantinosiks, even considering what you said authors. this is a resolution. they may try to use some other mechanisms in the future, which will nevertheless have legal force, and it is possible to lie that they will, after all, want to give russian assets to ukraine in some other way . the collective west has been using appropriate mechanisms that have nothing to do with the charter, it has been using international law since march 2014, this and uh, unilateral sanctions taken bypassing the security councils, arrest. the assets of imposing sanctions are no longer economic, but

political already not only on individuals, but also on institutions. well, let's say councils without the federation council in which i have the honor to work, and before that the state duma was under the corresponding american sanctions, but that has not the slightest precedent in the modern world, therefore, everything that the countries of the collective west have done so far already out of bounds. uh, international law has already gone beyond. well, if you like, the ethics of interstate relations. well, in the end, common sense and political decency and without a doubt. the line will continue. and further on , the corresponding legal decisions are being adjusted to this line. you and i remember that one of the fundamental principles of law, e, says that no decisions can be retroactive. now they are trying to create. uh, such a legal space that will extend to the entire time e of the current conflict, but if we take

the point of its report in february march 2014, therefore, so that it does not happen beyond any doubt that the action of the west is directed here, but in order not to happen, these actions will continue to be outside the legal field, and i am sure that when i do not say, if when we all the whole world will return to the legal field and to the regime of compliance , the charter of the united nations, those who are now creating this legal chaos will have to answer for their actions, but what is called and the word we deeds konstantin iosifovich and what do you think in general at the end? he's from the western camp about the use of russian assets, it generally exists. well, look at yesterday's vote in the united nations, this is such a mirror of the world that, uh, in theory, could become unipolar, but fortunately, it didn't. here are 94 countries that either forge, this is a unipolar world, or surrender under his pressure. uh,

less than half of the member states of the united nations, if we count not by the votes won, but by the population, then here the difference is even more significant, it may be a quarter of the world's population, maybe 1/5 no more in addition, uh, yes, uh, there is a fight for the world, uh, to taxi to some unipolar positions, and we see what it will be like now, if it becomes unipolar, then there is space for all other states, and now there are more of them half, thank you. god will have even less space for them. and, perhaps, it will not exist, in principle, what is the danger of a unipolar world? and that's why russia , together with its like-minded people, opposes him and the second one already answers your question. of course , within the adherents of the unipolar world. uh, it starts reversals of reeling. i would not like to give out wish.