it is always interesting how it all begins now you will see everything. manufacturers of good things want and most importantly. but it's best to check. putin said the geopolitical tragedy that

was the collapse of the soviet union, but he just even admitted i have a simple stupid question about nationally saying that white people are criminals. we cancel the bialowieza agreements, well, cancel it. maybe someone who is there three people zelensky another, lukashenka who never admitted that they cannot cancel, because it was acknowledged by someone here. this is a purely legal question. yes, who is it, maybe even it was, in my opinion, at the very beginning, even completely yes , talk about the national intelligentsia. and who are you, i am the national institute of dirt. let's collect. well, you all have a lot of like-minded people who free you, that is. there is no there is another. now i'm talking about something else, see there was a

law of the soviet union democratically elected that when a republic leaves the ussr , referendums should be held in all territories. for everyone those who are not transnistria, a referendum has already been held that they do not want this exit and join russia according to the law of the soviet union transnistria would no longer be in moldova, uh, according to the law of the soviet union, if these referents were held in the donbass in the crimea and so on. all this butch, there would be no such thing as a greek agreement at all. this crime is a weapon in the neck, a legal course of events in the soviet union, which was recognized by the international community and helsinki , how do we treat this fact and the criminal, who did it. well, so to speak, this is logic, but the revolution of the october xviii years, which for me is the great october. the socialist revolution also does not have a sufficient number of legal grounds

against the tsar father, when they demanded, i simply understood that we should stop where, but we condemned it. let's forget about the tsar father, by that moment he was sitting in the shlisselburg fortress for me, if i change the october revolution about renunciation is not renunciation, there is a crime and the sovereign had no right. that is, if we have a crime for a crime a crime, then it is true in favor of mikhail, but in russian history no one was paul the first, when they came to him he said, you can kill me. what are you talking about? we are talking about where to find the initial mistake, the initial mistake is that never a single country in the world has the right to lead the transition to another socio-political information, eliminating the

higher productive force of the previous formation. well, yes, the transition that was carried out in the ninety-second year eliminated virtually all higher productive forces. now he again remembers about elbrus, i worked with these elbrus in the seventies, they remember again about these machines. and what was said, we don't need our own electronics what's next, well, that's not the point, but it was a million years ago. well, a million years ago, then it was rusna, it was now being judged there, but that was a million years ago, but even if we condemn everything now, even if we hold a trial, for example, by the dead, although everyone says so, something crime will not return anything to us. that yes, we will not return the soviet union canceled the belovezhskaya pushcha, the way we understand that this is a crime in this, everyone says there is not a single one now. if you look, it means that he is a politician who would not condemn this. the fact that we allowed a giant with this historical tragedy was

a catastrophe, the crime of the century is indisputable. this is recognized by everyone. well, as it were, firstly, the recognition is not up to the end. secondly, how would the centers of the name of traitors stand in the middle of sverdlovsk yes, as it were , thirdly and thirdly, finally, the question is that we are simply accused of being there strictly, if the still living territory of the donbass is the legal territory of the legal ukrainian state or not, ukraine will receive all its predictions for us. yes, we will fight this crime on the territory. we are accused, we do not care about their accusations. they will not accept any legislative base, which we will let down, as you never do. eh, as it were, that we are where the main thing is always against one word. we have lost the information war. we are losing the information war, but we have not lost it. no. yes, you can never say that someone will lose, we lose. where in what environment, and where we work we don’t have it, well, as it were, well, nevertheless, well, in

russia, of course, it’s complicated, if everything is so good, why does he say that why is it good with dan kherson, and if everything is so bad, why did we even allow ourselves to do something, if everything is so bad, then why did you do something on february 24, if it was so bad, why did crimea become russian back in the fourteenth year, if everything is so bad, why did we have super weapon that shouldn't be would be developed if we follow the logic of serdyukov. here in this logic we need to talk in 3 months in a month. that's the question the veterans do n't say like that, but they say it's just bad, that's why it's not so bad, as they lie, but it's not bad bad, and then that's because we will fix it radically. fix everything vertically. we can do what you say, we can't. at the same time, to destroy this system, which, like it or not, but works radically, the correction implies the destruction of the system, no one says about destruction. the whole system term radically

implies that in order to radically add to this system other terms that will compensate for errors at a different speed. right now, at least now, do not bankrupt the factories producing buki and now today. today and here i dealt with this topic. there goes from the days of the legal form of the factory works the money gets the job. now everything is open more than a thousand new factories have paid for, uh, a millionth product. i also dealt with this no one nothing did not change in mind, what kind of shoes, well, you are now talking specifically about gold, which will be yes, well , so in this deck. uh, so to speak, this continues to be said and motivated by the new plants. no, the name is working, it’s working badly for security products, but you can’t do this during the war, which means that someone wanted to bankrupt these knives for a long time, no one wants anything, right? nobody wants to live anymore. yes, everything has changed, everything

has changed, and the way the system works now works nothing at all, phrases. everything is good as and no phrase. everything is bad. no no no no. but what about, wait, that is, you offer, that is, without semitones, that is, either everything, although either you never offered this at all. i've been here for the last nine months, so to speak. only they are engaged in what i say is completely different. so what i will explain to you, i say, so to speak, my position has always been very simple, when you admit mistakes, when you tell the masses the truth, when you really tell them everything is bad. you have the right to interpret. and this is the decisive right information war, but before you win the information war. it is necessary to win the conceptual one, that is, to admit the fundamental mistake, then we go into geological information, then political, and then everything else started exactly like this, perestroika, when the soviet intelligentsia. to tell the whole truth and everything bad, and then we lost a page from the fact that we

shut up those who say something for the soviet system, because they said you participated in the political self during perestroika i know perfectly well what happened during perestroika, when my articles were scattered, no, into sets. i was a ph.d. yes, and then i went to america to teach economics, yes, but i did not have time to destroy them. so we'll break through for a while, then we'll continue. jeffix is ​​a man who participated in shock therapy in russia in the nineties and suddenly he comes for us. i think that ukraine would have acted wiser if it had declared, we want neutrality is strange, but listen, in the current military conflict, nato wants to establish its own presence throughout the black sea region. i think

it's very dangerous. we say that we are saving ukraine, but we are not saving it, because ukraine is being destroyed as a result of this proxy war. they call it strategic dominance. in all parts of the world. i don't think a unipolar world is the place to be so an interview with an american economist jersey is an american method. before her, when you look, paraphrasing marx, you don’t even know from which side to approach this story. march is true, so talked about cost. but hmm uh, a very important question sergey ivanovich raised, of course, about mobilization widely, understood maybe the state of our sun of the mind about, uh, what was our

historical path, what happened there? but you know, at the same time, i would take it wider, that's because i believe that, of course, our demobilization , bringing us out of a capable, non-combat-ready state, began with nikita sergeevich khrushchev, who was the first to make a deal in exchange for his own personal power. e is against immunity for the party nomenklatura. well and, in principle, when this principle was implemented here, and then a lot of things happened next, the first shift in ideology, because it was about satisfying ever-growing needs. was talking. first he is here, but i will not go into details, but i can say for sure demobilization and transformation. us outside hmm outside the capable state began under khrushchev. so, under comrades brezhnev, it was completely fulfilled, because the soviet society of leonid

ilyich thought only about satisfying these very needs, which were even written down in the program of the communist party of the soviet union and in the main decisions, if i am not mistaken, already at the 22nd congress, if he is respected by the ardent estonian guys, and we will submit, yes to what is happening, yes, here. well, i don't mind. yes, i can go to today's needs. but just to indicate the depth of the problem. in fact, the need after the death of a comrade became i can put here, as it were, a point on and on yes and on. and continue to live other problems. yes, and do not deal with this further. here , uh, but at the same time, when we should now really uh, solve the problem and answer the question. what will be our new social organization, we must understand all this depth of the problem, at least there, at least up to this point. right

now. well, maybe you can go to uh. you can go to the current international situation there and everything and everything that happens there. oh well, the blockade failed, i liked it the most. here he was handsome, in general he said, well , yes, the isolation of russia did not take place. it turned out that there are other countries that have a different opinion, but their opinion we do not believe at all is actually, even truth in the top twenty, which is a strange way. well, i quoted the cupcake almost word for word. here, uh, which is a strange formation of twenty. but even on it, after all, the american camp proper, directly subordinate, was less than half of this twenty. and this is a very big nuisance, so to speak. well, yes, this is still considered to be traded. here is the organizer. uh, indonesia,

she always solved the problem, no matter how russia offend. well, as it were, so that the americans, well, in conflict with them, representatives, incomprehensible parties, no economy is no less than nothing. what is this all about? well, zelensky speaking at the g20 is a violation of the formats, he has nothing at all about what biden's grandfather listens to, the granddaughter came no, well, as if he was told to speak, and he speaks here. well, uh, the united states was very demanding that he speak. he spoke. what's next, the united states is now running the g20. no. see the question here starts from another. until 2008, the seven ruled everything and no one in the world, including china and everyone else in 2008, said that e. well,

like this, it was believed that the seven, er, seven, eight, lay there. it has already started there. it has already started there, you know, the g-7, but in principle, what the g-7 discussed was a certain plan of action for the whole world and somehow with it. everyone even agreed, and the twenty to produce an interesting thing, firstly, the seven lost the meaning of the appointment immediately after that, a secondly, the americans lost their monopoly right in this meeting. this monopoly is gone, it is no more. here, yes the world the world is now arranged. so , well, i think that the twenty will leave the twenty will leave the same way the seven left, because the future belongs to organizations such as the sco brix and others that we don’t know yet, but which will definitely uh, the most important thing will arise after all this stuff. well, not the most important, well surrender, but what the foreign minister said, china's war.

together with russia we will build a new multipolar world order. this is, in a certain sense, uh, well, a summary. uh, the whole event. that's interesting, yes, very important, by the way, the chinese position. uh, what they didn’t vote for, it’s interesting, yes, that our information from belarus on voting. well, there, among other things, is china, which, by the way, i don’t remember that it is so radically tough, but other countries so that they have different questions in relation to belarus yes, i just understand that every historical process has a very significant inertia. here. well, these are probably countries are very much afraid that america might do something to them, but they are not very much afraid of us. uh. we are in this sense, they are

green, they are rightly not afraid, because we have never forced anyone, therefore they are rightly not afraid. here the americans are afraid, but only the world is changing very much. you see, look, here's my chinese said, look at turkey when the minister of the interior. e comes out and says yesterday. uh, traces of a terrorist attack are underway, united states today a turkish newspaper comes out and writes that she was a terrorist instructed by american instructors, yes. well, well, here is the position and turkey is not afraid, because turkey understands that either it will remain as a sovereign state, or its territory will be turned into someone in bloody chaos. and this is a very simple alternative. that's where in turkey who don't want it to turn into bloody chaos. well, they will fight for it. well, probably in other territories, they still do not understand this. but

after all, putin also said this, without any illusions. and about being a multipolar world, well, there will be sovereign countries and not sovereign ones, and this will happen. well, russia has always left the opportunity for all countries to maintain their sovereignty and be and be sovereign countries. true, these countries with great speed sought to surrender their sovereignty here to our geopolitical enemies. yes, volodya, but at the same time, i will say this, while it was their historical problems that were corrected, this also brought the enemy infrastructure closer to our borders. yes, well, at the same time, we are, so to speak, like this, turning them into ourselves, we are in this sense act, would act against their own concept, if the concept that he is transferring foreign forces to their borders. why such a concept? eh? well, you understand how what it means is strange forces to their borders. yes, now

we will show that ukraine is absolutely sovereign. let your infrastructure enter. there, rocket in kharkov, time will give. ukraine, according to me, what i accept from him happened in practice, e. 90% in 2004 and finally in 2014, undoubtedly not by us, and since that moment since the fourteenth year ukraine absolutely 100% no, sovereign strangeness. well, again, we recognize then the right. whoever in the baltics of the same ukraine then spoils someone else to us, they say that, but this is the wife of their sovereign right to spoil us. no, wait. of course not, of course not, because his sovereignty is not sovereignty - this is not the question, when you, well , somehow refuse to do something, some kind of responsibility, completion, they decided that this is responsibility shits russia they responsibly,

they say that we hated you. we want with you output. and we have to show what are the costs, of course. well, that's what i'm talking about, so here we can't play this game of equal sovereignties. so we will lose ours, why didn't i talk about this? and we will answer it, yes, and we'll see. what will be the costs? no no look. now, if when we are talking about sovereignty, by the way, it was about this, by the way, he said, not only putin spoke about it, schultz already said about europe, we - he says - are for cooperation with europe if there is one problem europe is dependent on and subordinate to these countries. it was said directly. therefore, if someone is located, china therefore, if someone is dependent on these countries, then we should treat him accordingly in a third country, which is ok, in the nineties we

were dependent on a third country. now we were talking about the nineties. of course, we were, of course, we were, but we did everything and moreover, well, quite competently. i spoke about this in the program today. now, if no one 1999 said that there in 20 years the russian federation uh will conduct a special military operation against it uh, there will be 55 nator countries led by the united states of america and the russian federation well will fight them uh in many respects on an equal footing and uh, very productive business in the tenth year. if someone said, i would never have believed it, because i am in business in the ninth year, together with the whole country and together with our leadership. i think we all thought as one about one thing, what tomorrow will be like and how we survived this year, the second chechen serpent, and how would we survive with difficulty, it was possible to recruit

50,000 to solve local problems. out of a million 150,000, exactly, and we didn't know if breakfast would come for us, yes, countries of the nation, and so on and most of them are of us. uh, they thought that, in principle, well, it was already impossible to revive russia. this was the state of society in the ninety-ninth year, the majority, not all yes, e i'm talking about it, yes, therefore, of course, all this is historical time. who can lose sovereignty somehow then return it, but clean praise, although it does. this is incredibly difficult, because most of the problems that we are dealing with now are the result of the loss of sovereignty as a result of the geopolitical catastrophe and the nineties. so, well, everything happened quickly, they lost it rapidly, and

it takes a long time to return and painfully , there is no other way to do this. we must be ready. what to return always. it's harder than losing. well, it’s difficult, of course, it’s difficult, of course, the issue of sovereignty, because in the modern world any a country that is a member of an international organization. she inevitably delegates part of her sovereignty, obeying the rules of this organization, therefore, from this point of view. it is better, of course, to create your own brightonizations, to create them, but i don't think that, for example, we need to take he is already skeptical about this structure. you can't rent it, because then the americans will just take it. they'll just eat it. there will be no need to build any alliances. democracy, nothing can be taken, by the way, speaking, the term was also invented, the american used it for the first time. yes, the united nations is here, so he is he must relate to this. in

general, it seems to me that we treat it the way it is now , that we understand that he is not the organization that will decide, but at the copper stage there is no other replacement yet , and we probably do not have enough strength and there are not enough of our supporters in the world in the world community so that we can create our own. yes, brix is ​​a germ, i say again that it is a germ. it can be said more embryo. maybe the future world organization, maybe this world order will be formed on its basis, but so far it is not taking shape. i agree absolutely that the twenty in general it was created for a different purpose. this is the reform of the financial system. and the first one you yourself went through two or two summits a year really started with reforming the international monetary fund. well, in 2010 it all ended and the twenty turned into exactly what the eight did,

then it was no longer the seven-eight. yes we played with limited did. zelensky now i’ll get there, when the fairies yes, no now i’ll get to zelensky, this is what i did there from 20 to twenty, i say, this is a format that is not regulated by any rules, that is, no, there is no charter, no agreement lies. there is no procedure. even here comes the custom of custom family photographs. by the way, he was now thwarted by the decision about who will perform there, in fact, takes. uh, the country that in this case is presiding over this themselves. that is, to put it mildly, this question. we can address condonesia.

maybe i'm not human? and who can really yama what else is behind you the witching sea of ​​surnin and in human form in suitors, you see, what a beauty?

let's translate from clerical to understandable, everything is not so scary if there is an instruction.

heart of parma hi this is my kindergarten here i have many friends and girlfriends diana is 4 years old. i know she has autism. i heard that she used to not know how to make friends. she didn't speak at all. she could not be put alone for a minute, but now everything is different. yana receives a special program. she is

learns to play with us. yana is cool diana my friend naked hearts create a free system of services for special children of their families. can you support the work? help us help more. to let us go out more often. on the other hand, we are used to watching the video stopped working, we open, we watch

russian channels, and all the series of movies and cartoons, educational programs and documentaries for free without registration, we watch, we watch in the application or on the site took a position. she is generally like that towards us. occupies a strange position. in the same place before it was a member in 2005 of the two countries. they, well, flex into the united states very well.