russian channels and all series of movies and cartoons educational programs and documentaries for free without registration you can applications or on the site occupied a position. she actually takes such a strange position towards us. the east asian summit was also held there before that. that's who didn't let us in in 2005, who didn't let us become a member in 2005, two countries. this is understandable, but the second one was indonesia, so indonesia has its own position in terms of the fact that they, well, bend under the united states very well that they performed there, because most consider it considers. it's like an insult to the united

states. to put it mildly, disruption of family photos. this is a spit in the direction of the host, actually the indonesians. by and large, very seriously, but the americans bent them, as they bend, very many others must be reckoned with for this. here we need to create a system of the same dependence, which will allow us to recruit our union, which we will create, and now in china. for example, with china, along with others. why will we create it, we have the same strength, i agree with colleagues about about what we say about what morality is not, no, no. well, just now vladimir vladimirovich said that there is a traditional center there. have we done this somewhere? we are promoting this, we are talking about it, there are not 150 million on each. the total population is only 150 million. so 6,000 will be heads

and these 6,000 warheads. something i didn’t see with my head when i need to take them. we say you will be able to apply, you leave to box. only with hands. don't hit. those, and they create the stage, they create the backgrounds, if we had 6.000, no, it wasn't, i think with we did a little differently and much earlier than now, so we'll see how it does. no, not cuts, so they are trying to mock us and talk about us. nothing, but. we have nuclear weapons, which we must in no case no, which provides us with the possibility of pursuing our own independent policy. where, like her grandfather, we are conducting special operations everywhere now. it is clear we have us, if not for 6,000 combat. dexterity would not have been taken from us in crimea and not in donbass . i've been talking about this for a long time they are now doing it so that it is

time for us to be gone. this is understood on the territory of the russian told. how many sabotage reconnaissance groups acted on the territory of russia deep in russia today they took two scum who went to bury this kursk at these power plants, which means that scum demand to ban the russian language, russian culture, russian, but we have warheads and thanks to this we are not yet bombed. yes, it is constantly cut because of this, we did not turn into yugoslavia, for example, which we dismembered did not turn into, among other things, of course, we'll wait now, when they will blow us up from the inside, we'll wait, when they will impose aliens on us and why, because listen to the 24th. we are completely different. everything, of course, everything. after that, we saw political changes. sorry we saw. came to full height, we catch snat. you like to talk with america no, we are not at war, what component does

america and nato not participate in the war, they can participate in ukraine, we often fight, but we are not against them. and no, well then, no, then, of course, not well then great, now the fps is good the fsb has published data such that for the last quarter from july to september inclusive ukraine is not lc. dpr where 700,000 left, and 100,000 of our citizens visited ukraine, and 66,000 said that they were 32,000 for personal reasons. these are the people who serve the transport structures. the transport company is the question of what we are transporting there, the second problem. we pump regularly every day we send 42 million cubic meters through the gas transmission system of ukraine where in the european union? i am a scientist, i ask him a question. and i i know what to explain to me, but we’ll take it off, but i’m

asking you america is fighting with us, they are by whom america does not participate in the war by other means, as if through their own, well, like any great power during the cold war, fought on someone else’s too by proxy, supplying your women with their own names already with their own, therefore the coffins are already going there 300 people, coordinating logistics are sticking out in germany already groups are sticking out in poland groups are sticking out vova already miles in a straight line are coordinating how the offensive will go already and the satellite constellation is already all the possibilities of their intelligence already and good crews. what else do we need to fuck up nuclear weapons during the vietnam war? we didn't do the same. we pride ourselves on being temporary. we didn't exist then. yes, there was the soviet union. i’m just comparing the granddaughters who would have been executed, on the contrary, and

marshal’s akhivs. no, they’re fighters under the tricolor flag, lord, they were directly opposed to russia, so now there’s no, no, american vietnam war, what whether, there should be no, no logic. it's just that we we have been fighting now just against ukraine for 7 months now and we have been fighting against us we are something, vietnam, that is, here, in general, the situation is completely different from the word completely ukraine yes, there was no russian federation on the territory. vietnam well, what are we talking about, i don’t understand why experience helps us and us from the war to

analyze this particular situation, how he helps us by the fact that we cannot start a war. if we're crit like you say we're at war against nato at this time we're trading with nato let's trade like usual this is so strikes against nato countries and when these armies will really be there. so what can you change 6,000 warheads. stop having a hardware conversation, what are they giving you about what? i say yes, then you have to use it right away in almost an hour. they give you what, if they still fight with you, and now they give us everything, they say just don't touch the troops on the territory of ukraine no, of course. no, how not? well, show me what american units, there are a minute of ropes, 1600,

polyakov is operating there. there is quite specific parts of the british designer, the structure of american intelligence is located there . american military units. they don't hide. that's it. they are fighting there under the flag of moving under their own flags. they are flags. they stick out. they have a strong-willed center with flags. they are sitting american instructors when miles in a straight line declare that they are together, right? it's like this whole madman from ukraine, the minister of defense. together we dared our headquarters to develop. and how did he go to kharkov ? why, what else do you need to pay taxes and the vietnam war were, until we uh no, they announced a special operation after that by the americans, they are handsome. they just don't care at all. while the united states is expressing concern and nuclear rattling

on the russian side, we do not believe that a nuclear explosion in europe will have any direct consequences for the health of the population of the country, traditional traditional nuclear, on the contrary, the united states remains low , and the probability of a large-scale rational attack. it's very low in the homeland and this hub speech of the secretary of homeland security, usa mallorca what? therefore, we can calmly go to europe. they, they cover europe with a nuclear umbrella, they said, they don’t care about us, they don’t care, but because if he strikes anything at us, if we introduce britain to the formats, they are just now very delaying this question because they want to place those forces not strategic strategic forces, but not nuclear -equipped countries in europe correctly because they know the sound, of course, for them, so we play by

their rules to say conventional weapons. they they want us to play the fact is that according to their rules we will not play anyway, because we have 150.000 before 150 million. we played, we had to sit and be silent in a rag on december 15, no one presents the citizens. we would continue to play by their rules. probably a weapon. what do you understand, there is no ukraine, the ukrainian army has long been destroyed to use. i have some good ideas for this. i can offer you a few options, for example, chinese comrades from chinese, they are preparing their quietly nuclear triad, i’m talking. in fact, it is already ready to be connected, that we are ready, that it is really used, and why not? well then, i’ll probably use it on us, but i don’t want to lie, but so,

so you want to verse without blood, to continue quietly, to continue to bring in ground forces, so that we can already hear the polish and the english speech of ukrainian is less and less, that we have seen everything more equipment is needed here, and we will do it when we reach ukraine, yes, we will hear the ukrainian border of the western border, the larger nato will be and everything will be easier. now we see, while another now, how do you say yourself ah? an industrial complex that will ensure our security, promote the conditionality of solving the problems of reaching the western border. we thought that we had 6,000 warheads that they did not deter, they are now deterring the fact that the united states is not fighting there. yes of course they fight. we have already decided 15 minutes. i was told that, of course, the us is fighting the us intelligence force is fighting in space people are having fun sockets of space

sheep, all possible options are working there, that they have their space group, provides coordination of troops, the americans give e targets to strike the americans give means americans for strikes - these are the crews for the maintenance of strikes, the americans provide and look further. oh, they are not only not only americans, they provide it europeans, but there are no forces there, how not, if we say listen man. how many people exactly, that these forces are there, then we really need to strike this, we don’t want to do it. so this is what you don't want to do. and i'm sure i am, well, i really want to, so it means that we already have opposing opinions. you're very i'm not very i would i would like msu i apologized. we have a big question about democracy. why do we have a trade turnover with european countries in the first six months and this pay is 35% higher

than the comparisons between the salary period for people, because if there is a war or a business from the south a we do n't have business from the south because those to whom we are supplied now basically and who basically replenishes it india said about europe from europe we also we have a higher than in elusive pen period, of course because they would be bulky. among the suppliers of europe, the first is china , the second is the united states, because the price of hydrocarbons is the server, which is our brother, who in the european union does not want to pay these types of sanctions well, as regards the fact that nuclear traces before the united states will not reach either, let's say

, migrants on boats who sail from those countries that are americans do not reach there. they just directly destroy the government there, unless, of course, they are not interested in how they will fight it later, the italians, the spaniards and the citizens of europe, and therefore we are every time someone from the european union declares something to our relations, and we start deep analysis. and how will this affect it, maybe some position has changed, it is necessary to understand that these people serve the interests of only one states. this is the united states of america , they don’t give a damn about their own interests. they just have nothing to do with them. they are not elected by their own citizens. there are no accountability mechanisms for them to think about it at all, so this topic. it seems to me that there is a limit here. as for the e general assembly. i was just expressing my subjective point of view. we have discussed here many times what the americans have been doing during this time. led by the west we are all western civilization in turn destroyed all the pillars of all the foundations of this

civilization in terms of those myths and mythologemes that have come down to us and in which every citizen of russia has been for the last 30 years. very holy believed that at least. uh, the right of private property is so sacred that no one before him would ever dare to do anything with it, the rule of law is the separation of powers. we have seen all this time that all decisions can be made by the executive branch without any sanctions from the judiciary. although such powers concern, we saw that property can be taken away not even by the fact of a person’s citizenship, but by the fact of his belonging to an ethnic group, because he may have long ceased to be a citizen of russia, but the very fact that he is a native of russia is enough reason to take away his private property, but in the way it is now apparently planned. to pick up the amount is already so huge, that is, before that it was possible to write off, before this is one businessman. someone did not agree, someone

did not decide, but now we are talking about hundreds of billions, it is necessary to give some formal reason. apparently, at least the opportunity to refer. like how someone writes an article and is not very sure of their own position. you can always find some scientist, whom no one well, at least refer to him. here is the general assembly, which does not have such authority that these decisions cannot be of any binding nature, no mechanisms that will be developed there of any mandatory nature for russia to have i will not, but if there is such a solution, then at least for the sake of appearances for future generations in order to convince subsequent generations of elites in various countries that you keep this money. no one will touch them with us. it will be possible to say that it was not we who decided it was the whole civilized world of the un general assembly that they came there, they did not come, they abstained in fact by a majority vote of the general assembly. he we made such a decision, therefore we did not violate our own legislation, but in the way we are there for international law and so on

things here, please, especially since this is already wrong. and the rules that in this regard what question arises. here we are every time at the official level severely criticizing the position of the united states of america, which is that the world should now be based on international rules. this is a very understandable position. they clearly explain what we mean by this, that they define these rules, that they have mechanisms that must implement these rules , that they have the resources that allow them to implement these rules in life, that they they have ways to punish anyone who goes against it. these rights, moreover, they have a set of pocket states that, no matter what, they don’t know where ukraine is located, they don’t know what is happening there, but they vote, as they say, the united states of america, now the question arises. and when we criticize their approaches. we are in favor of preserving the un in the form in which it exists. when we say

that the only basis and the only basis for our relationship should be international law in the form in which it exists, it suits us completely from beginning to end. this is a big question for me, because this is international law, it is the un and a large number of international organizations that were created during the cold war. created completely different conditions. they were created when those countries that today vote against us were either in our composition, or were in our blocs, which we headed and there was a completely different balance of power, and today these organizations, which used to be a real field for diplomatic battles to sort things out, ways to somehow agree, and so on today, in fact, are, if not a pocket organization in the hands of the united states of america, then at least it is under the huge influence of the united states of america, which was not in that there was definitely no period on such a scale, so

here the question arises of what we want first on the outer perimeter. look at the different statements on the margins of the g20 made by two very loved ones. now it’s strange for us from china and from india, india harshly criticized the united nations and said that it had not coped with its tasks, and after that it had not coped with these tasks, and now it could not cope with these tasks and put forward on the first tablet. 20 says. for the past 20 years, we have great hopes with her, she should become such a platform for us, china has expressed a different position in general. china expressed the most globalist position. i'm not saying you don't criticize, i'm not saying that it's bad or good in fact, china said that the central role should be played by the fact that the world should have maximum liberalization, maximum opening and acceleration of trade. there everything else between the strange no barriers nothing. this position differs both from our current position and from the position of india, which is also a close

state for us now, but they also articulate their positions. they are very understandable. what do they require. what do they want in our case? we need and this is an external position, which is very important for us, but it is very difficult to deal with the outside world. being the second third player of this world. every time we criticize um. here they are with their system with all this, we are still part of this system, and we are not the leaders of this system. we are the ones to whom the system was imposed, those who are trailing somewhere in the tail, those who are trying very hard to be like them, we do not succeed, because the rules of the game themselves have been developed. so as soon as we get close even, even if we want to be the first and in this system we will be kicked in the head i'll take everything away, throw it back again, so until then. eh, it's not just a wish there, so that we have an ideology for something else until the internal system is reformatted. the world around us will be very difficult, and in conclusion, what i would like to say, you asked several times why zelensky spoke there, firstly, i get

the impression that he is being turned into a liberal horseback horse of this globalist world. there, transgender people are brought to some events to other events, there 14-year-olds fighters for ecology and preservation of the environment. here he is now on a par with them and it does not matter. that makes sense, doesn't he have to come forward. well, i want to touch on what he said there, we didn’t see the recording, so i’m guided by the fact that sergeyevich lavrov he said that during his speech zelensky said that the turning point in world war ii came at forty the fourth year with the landing in normandy, you know, in the forty-fourth year there was another event, zelensky's grandfather was awarded the order of the red star, only he considers the turning point not the feat of his grandfather, not the feat of our grandfathers' fathers, that's my grandfather's brother, who died in latvia at least by birth. whose north of armenia is from a very small city, these people didn’t accomplish feats for him there

in normandy there is a turning point there, because a person is a traitor, he betrayed the memory of his family, he betrayed the memory of his nation, which he represents ethnically, he betrayed the memory of his nation, to whom he represents a civil sense and think, he generally betrayed the voters who are for they voted for him, because he promised them to bring peace to the dombas and think that a person who is capable of such a betrayal of his own memory of his own family that he will not betray his own country at the very first moment when it comes to this. i think it would be very stupid advertising. the united states strongly condemns the latest

russian missile strikes against ukraine, said the situation, when twenty such medical groups are taking place on the indonesian island of bali or bali itself passes, dary will only deepen concerned among the 20 participants about the destabilizing impact of the russian special operation in ukraine united states our staff partners will continue to supply ukraine with what it needs to protect itself, including air defense equipment systems. we will support ukraine as needed. absolutely. what are you wearing? well, firstly, these were not the last missile strikes, and there will be more later. you have already installed air defense, something didn’t work, it worked. why are they at home today, yes, another goal they were there for 50 wheelbarrows of their own. and they were even forced to admit that it was they who screwed it up. yes, your air defense systems are salty. what are you puffing? what are you puffing on? what for? or do you

think that your boorish behavior towards russia? this will change our plans. in our country, the supreme commander-in-chief vladimir vladimirovich putin has set a task. and they will perform for sure, you understand? well, ask them to translate, you have guys there who speak russian, only vika, well, lung, don’t ask, she has everything through the mat, it turns out in one frenchevich. as a historian, you cannot leave aside your epic dispute about uncle vova and uncle yoshu, because here we are somehow idealizing the stalin era, i say, look. here's how it was. here's the rate here on the eve of the war alexander nevsky prokofiev shostakovich and the most popular comedy was frivolous american jazz, by the way, merry guys, the most popular song burnt by the sun translated polish was and forgot yuryev vadim kozin and, according to a very common legend in the kremlin stalin asked the cliffs to sing you. from odessa

kichman. two orkans ran. two urkas fled to taiwan, so everything was not so there. e, everything is so tough and the movie she fled, yes. and so the film was shot to the melody. yes, yes, i had a different melody. listen, i used to host a program. sorry, where respected authoritative people came and sang thieves' songs. and i can also give many such examples and there was a hat to throw kefir, if tomorrow there is a war and after the war there were trophy films, including german and soviet horror for boys they showed not only the feat of a scout, but also tarzan, so here all this polyphony was different. we sometimes simplify the past life, which we have not seen, and try to say, here is a sample that was different. i'm in a different story. i thought, is it worth talking about this from the high levels of the twenty. it ’s like, but here the abomination is disgusting. uh, mouse fuss,

but i think it's very important to say, because the kind of people i'm going to talk about want to blow up both belarus and russia from the inside. remember there was such a tikhanovskaya, cutlet fairy. yes, they have now scandal upon scandal. well, it's important that nga appeared there. this is not some kind of democratic national institution. this is a non- disclosure agreement. so, it turns out that everyone who goes there to work, they call them volunteers. those who want to undermine from within, belarus and at the same time from russia are forced to sign an eight- page document, which means that among other things, the first thing is written there that it cannot be disclosed for any disclosure. you repeatedly. he how many times will you divulge or do something, not like that like the owners. you have to pay 30,000 euros. the agreement is drawn up in russian, by the way, not in belarusian, in russian and in lithuanian, this all public type of structure has a board of directors. there are

also foreigners in this board of directors, and there is an interesting record there, which is very indicative of the mood of the fugitives in general for what is happening in the western camp for these pocket states. does it matter who these volunteers are tikhonovskaya, or are they some kind of state? here are the voters usa it says that, uh, the one who concludes the tenant agreement, can transfer his rights to another owner without notice, more precisely, of his own free will, notified 5 days in advance. this is the type of volunteer. these people with such agreements are in complete political cabala, they are working against us, and it is on such politicians that they stake. i can’t rule out at all that when there, at the dawn of my career, i was scholtz. macron signed some kind of similar agreement. it’s just that we don’t know about it yet, because it says that the very fact of its disclosure is already the subject of violations of the attention of the deal.

jeffrey sachs is a man who participated in shock therapy in the nineties in russia suddenly he comes for us. i think that ukraine would have acted wiser if it had declared, we want neutrality strange, but listen, in the current military conflict, nato wants to establish its presence in the entire black sea region. i think it's very dangerous. we say that we are saving ukraine, but we are not saving it, because ukraine is being destroyed as a result of this proxy war. they call it strategic dominance. in all parts of the world. i don't think a unipolar world is the place to be so an interview with an american economist jersey is an american method.

and it smelled amazing too. gray i can see directly, like a carnation, and now i'll throw it in. do you know what they call svetlana tikhonovskaya's office for short, svetlana tikhanovskaya's office. ost here for the belarusian. it just sounds like a spit masterplan ost ostlant. here are all these sharp biters, when our grandfathers, uh, grandmothers were stolen by great-grandfathers, great-grandmothers, but i i work in germany. they call their svetka post her office among themselves, and above them