due to the most important events in the federation council see you in a week in the senate program new project one day with the general with the head of the main directorate for road safety of the ministry of internal affairs of russia mikhail chernikov today we are driving along the route, moscow tula orelkursk. behind the wheel it helps to work. we passed with you, we see the city of tula after the traffic police. well, they don’t expect to think at all, such why and how. pancakes that the head of the main directorate arrived, is that right? we didn't enter.

hello this is the news alexander kireevsky summing up the information results of friday and the whole week. on monday, november 14,

the un general assembly adopted a resolution in which russia is recognized as responsible for paying monetary compensation to ukraine. the current resolution, in fact, means the payment of reparations by the un general assembly does not have the legal authority to force this or that country to pay these same reparations, in fact, we are talking about an attempt by western countries or to hygienize their actions by freezing our foreign exchange reserves and assets of individuals, by the way, today came the news that european countries have frozen the assets of russian individuals for 68 billion euros, so far. this does not mean that our citizens have lost their funds forever. the process in this direction will move forward in a purely political plane. in terms of our future relations with the west, the only chance. get back your money and other home assets of the pitchfork. well, that's all, the rest is to emerge victorious in this fight,

for example, the decision of the stockholm arbitration on the controversial issue of paying for russian gas in finland, which was also this week, the court ordered the finnish gazun to pay gazprom export 300 million euros for gas already supplied and recognize the change in the form of payment to rubles as force majeure , in fact. this releases our country from responsibility. true, other lawyers believe that this is not so, but nevertheless. why did the judges in stockholm suddenly become so objective? the answer to finland will soon be threatened with the onset of cold weather, rolling blackouts about this were brought by the finnish authorities themselves. this example suggests that if we find ways for our development without western markets, only then this very west will talk to us on an equal footing, return all property and still pay penalty interest. for the inconvenience, in the meantime, western politicians are dreaming of using our funds to close holes in

their own budgets, the huge funds that they spend on the war in ukraine can no longer be reimbursed only through emission. well, this is a separate topic for conversation. in the meantime, the result to me so our owners of foreign assets in europe and america should not lose hope. so the first resolution of the un general assembly condemning the actions of russia in ukraine, i remind you, was adopted back in the spring, then scored 144 votes for well, now it’s only a little more than the nineties. is it possible to say that some states are beginning to realize the real state of affairs about this, we asked dmitry polyansky, first deputy permanent representative of the russian federation to the un it seems to me that there is every reason for such a conclusion, because i feel here, uh, with all the clarity that there is, a certain weariness in a significant part of the international community in connection with the attempts of the western state to force them, uh,

to take a side on ukraine a. more precisely , their side, that is, to condemn russia, not all countries support such black and white, but the perception of the ukrainian crisis. they understand that it has a lot of different layers that must be taken into account in order to develop a national position. westerners but they want to forgive everything and just force them to vote for those anti-russian initiatives that they put forward, if at the beginning it worked out, but now this machine is clearly starting to falter. and here is the latest resolution, which in itself is extremely doubtful, to say mild, actually very healthy point of view is absurd. this resolution was indeed supported by less than half of, uh, in fact the members of the un and western countries cannot be satisfied with such a result. you can see it in their reactions, and because they are not particularly not very, so to speak

, actively promoting the results of this vote, as they did, this is in previous cases. therefore, i think that yes, there is a tendency to understand what is really behind this conflict. e comes to a significant part of the world community. so the decision of the general assembly, it has no legal force, moreover, in fact, the adoption of such a decision is a violation of existing international law. we gave our assessments . we said it's absolutely non-legal document, er, it covers the desire of western states at the national level, er, to advance the issue of confiscation of russian frozen assets. it's obvious to everyone to do. this, uh, without violating international law, they can not, so they need this fig leaf to hide behind so far , as far as i know, no one has taken practical steps, but it cannot be ruled out that somewhere someone will appeal to this and try to imagine. this is a

resolution not its non-legal consistency as the position of the international community, allegedly in favor. here, uh, such reparations or some other compensation. e with russia but it's absolute. uh, any lawyer. a self-respecting person will tell you that this has no basis. and, of course, it is very sad that our western former partners are going into such non-legal planes and are trying to politicize, among other things. international law we have already said many times that the american authorities are not shy in their actions in relation to other countries. they often run. well, to put it mildly , to them in a diplomatic way of persuading private conversations. representatives of various states spoke of undisguised pressure on their voting positions. yes, in general, the americans use the fact that the headquarters. it is located near new york and they simply physically do not let people who are objectionable to them attend the meeting. is it possible, under these conditions, to speak of

full-fledged work on these issues, they give the americans here the descent, because they have obligations under the agreement on the presence of un bodies in new york of the central bodies. uh, they are required to issue visas for all activities related to the work of the organization. they try to act selectively, they try, so to speak, to impose on other countries and, first of all, russia and their opinion, who they want to let in, who they want to let in, sometimes there are recommendations that the level that you have chosen is very strange, so maybe you should lower level. well, we absolutely do not react to this, we believe that the americans must fully fulfill all their obligations . secretary, he and the organization's service. they, too, are forced to wait for our rightness, the correctness of our position that the americans should allow everyone to attend an event within the framework of the un. and even so, the americans can

refuse to give it away without any reason. we have our money for a long time and even use it on our own, but in essence. it doesn't change anything. in that case. this will be the use of someone else's property for personal interests. well, to put it simply, stealing, so we don't care what they do with our money at this stage, but on at the next stage, they will return everything, and even with interest. after all, russians always come for their money. vladimir putin spoke on the phone with recep taip erdogan, they discussed the so -called grain deal, taking into account its extension, and, as the kremlin press service reports, they emphasized that this package agreement should be fully implemented. let me remind you that the deal includes not only the export of ukrainian grain from the black sea ports . well, the export of russian fertilizers and agricultural products to the world markets is another topic

the conversation was the implementation of the initiative to create a gas hub in turkey today, vladimir putin held a very format operational meeting with members of the security council, the head of state opens the meeting. designated his theme as the improvement of civilian equipment. today we have a planned question to the ministry of emergency situations. the ministry of emergency situations proposes to discuss the issues of improving civil defense. let's get started the office of the united nations high commissioner for human rights is studying video of the massacre of russian servicemen earlier, footage appeared on the network in which ukrainians kill russian servicemen who had already surrendered presumably. this happened in makeyevka, the dpr authorities appealed to the un and the international red cross with a demand to somehow respond to such a

blatant war crime. the russian ministry of defense previously stated that this is a common practice of the armed forces, which is supported in kiev and stubbornly ignored in the west, the military department added that the ukrainian authorities. have to to answer for all such crimes with the details of anastasia efimova. the first to get into the network were these shots taken from a copter on the ground of the bodies of russian servicemen and an explanation of the ukrainian media supposedly the consequences of an artillery strike. . here the freeze-frames can be seen quite clearly, those taken prisoner do not pose a threat. and then the shooting. come out. come on, what exactly happened in the ukrainian segment of social networks. tried to explain one of

those who came out, allegedly began to shoot back fire , the quote was all liquidated, however. the excuse does not stand up to scrutiny. especially if you watch the published video from the very beginning. back scream behind the scenes, apparently belongs to one of the victims of these so-called creators of history , one of them, as follows from the video, nazariy, this is believed to be nazar mikhailovsky with a phone in his hands, his old friend artur bortnichuk, both graduates of the kharkov university of the ministry of internal affairs, both played kvn with some porn ukraine is precisely this pledge a brilliant political future, but not screening. you have been long gone. no, it’s been knocking recently where this student video was published on nazar mikhailovsky’s vkontakte page of the social network in modern ukraine. moreover, among the

videos that future soldiers in isa at one time managed to share a lot of what was for the neo-nazi kiev regime. may in itself be considered a crime before the maidan, even the victory parade on may 9 in kherson by. with arsen vakov of the sample of 2015, what can be justified for such a couple with the russian language, which at the dawn until recently considered native only and remains. what to shoot at the unarmed. here is his friend, a flight attendant, another thing, as expected, - he says, only at sea, discipline seemed, and, as it were, to people. i hope the perpetrators will be held accountable for the sudden revelations of the famous russophobe from the german edition of bild yuri andryupka even noted under the video of the ukrainian minister of defense reznikov that he would put things in order, but after a few minutes this tweet was deleted, the traces were erased, as if there were no military crimes, which, as recalled in the russian

defense department. this is not the first time that kiev has committed a deliberate and methodical murder by geeks with direct shots in the head of more than ten immobilized russian servicemen, no one will be able to imagine. as a tragic exception against the background of the allegedly universal observance of the rights of the kiev regime, the ukrainian military personnel who surrendered this week are being held in accordance with all the requirements of the geneva convention on the treatment of prisoners of war. the killing of russian war prisoners is not the first and not the only war crime - this is a common practice in the armed forces. actively supported by the kiev regime point-blank, not noticed by its western patrons. judging by ours, the participants in the massacre of russian soldiers have nothing to do with the nationalist battalions, the fighters of the armed forces, however, this hardly matters, the so

-called georgian legion published the massacre of prisoners near kiev last april, militants from a terrorist recognized in russia battalion. azov admitted that the soldiers were shot in the knees by an officer in the head and not a word of condemnation from the outside. western protests or even expressed concerns by their prisoners should always be treated humanely. any illegal act or omission on the part of the state holding captives is prohibited. this is the neva convention of 1949, however, in a world where international law has long been replaced by convenient ones, and most importantly, such political flexible rules for its observance in western countries. apparently they decided do not bother anastasia efimova to carry on. the narcissistic committee has already opened a criminal case, in fact, the mass murder of russian prisoners should now be restored to all the circumstances of what happened and all those involved. the military

investigative bodies of the investigative committee of russia have initiated a criminal case on the fact of the execution by representatives of the ukrainian armed forces of at least 11 captured russian servicemen on the territory of the lugansk people's republic under articles on murder and ill-treatment of prisoners of war by investigators at the moment measures are being taken to identify the perpetrators of the crime, as well as to identify those who filmed the brutal video of the massacre of unarmed russian soldiers. the russians demanded that international organizations condemn the execution of russian prisoners and conduct a thorough investigation, the department noted that the west left without attention, evidence of the crime of kiev and similar approval makes the american and european curators of ukraine with participants in the form stressed that the atrocity will not go unpunished and no one will leave from retribution.

bogata announced today that she found no traces of a dirty bomb in ukraine. who would doubt how objectively this investigation is difficult to say, one could hardly imagine that the ukrainian authorities would take inspectors to those enterprises where something forbidden could be found. yes, and the method of verification still leaves questions in general current conditions. the topic of the proliferation of nuclear materials rises, especially acutely. our side has always taken a clear position in this direction dangerous materials. well don't have to fall into the wrong ones hands, and renat ivanovich is in touch with us , writhing adviser to the general director of the concern rosenergo, there is the state corporation ross atom. pleasant ivanovich well, let's comment, please. uh, of course, the solution is mgt. although, i'm not at all

surprised. i think it would be difficult to expect something in these conditions. i am absolutely in solidarity with you and it’s good that you are not surprised, in fact, i have already managed to read a lot of various such emotional comments on this topic, but to fill up, er. well, i don't understand why gushing uh such emotions about a quite predictable indeed, but a document. well, firstly, uh, well, as if the moment is formal, and this is a revolution. she grossly violates the charter of the organization itself. and that's because there is. eh, in this statute. i will literally read the third article, which describes the functions of this organization is tired, which means that the function in the performance of its functions of the agency does not condition the provision of assistance by any

political economics. by military or other requirements incompatible with the provisions of this, this basic point is tired, which they grossly violated. in addition, it is necessary, what is to be understood, that a magata is an organization, and it is about the peaceful atom, and not about anything else, but it is about supporting research, e, some kind of research. it is pro-monitoring, it is about accounting, but it is not about the war. and this is two times, and as far as i know. the russian federation has never, through the mouths of any of them, but of representatives of the authorities, and has not brought charges, that is, the russian federation has shared information with the world community. about what they have with us information. uh hmm means regarding the preparation, uh and

pressure of the so-called uh dirty atomic side charges are filed in a very different way announcement is made following the results of the investigation. that's exactly the same as the circuit charges. you absolutely rightly noted that no investigation was carried out in this regard, moreover, it means that they write russia accused and , uh, they say uh, that means ukraine, a hmm, turned to them and allowed them to three locations at three points. well , first of all, yes, much more than three times, of course, much. of course, i am exaggerating a little, but i will say that the next dirty atomic bomb can be made in any equipped basement for this. it

is not necessary to use the room at all. the nuclear power plant is so for a minute, and therefore all the talk that they checked these three locations on this basis, they conclude that there are no signs, as they write here, but there are signs of declared, but nuclear activity there. well, uh, this wording really does not stand up to any criticism. here we must keep in mind one more point by the skirmisher. this is the resolution spoke from canada, which is well known for its anti-russian russophobic and statements and positions in general, they invited finland, apparently, a to their bad company for quantity. and that's why, and as if this document was already from the very beginning, it could not be other than the one that turned out to be this tangentially, that means, a dirty bomb and

around it, uh, well, how would i say that i'm sorry, right? look here. here is how it works now. but what, but the iaea seems to be like a respected organization came to check there is no bomb, which means russian they lied about poor, fluffy , beautiful, democratic zelensky, and his assistants and all his accomplices, and now they will be waving and talking about this piece of paper. you see, no, there are no dirty bombs in ukraine and they cannot make one. and why did we agree to carry out this inspection, so, probably, it was necessary, probably, to say that this is complete nonsense. from us, uh, it means that it depended little to influence. we objectively could not. and let's acknowledge this fact alone. naturally, they staged a performance out of this. and here is such, in fact, the properties

that we have today is elementation. you see, unfortunately, the iaea is not the only international institute that imitates a flurry of activity. uh, it means against for everything good against everything bad, this is pure imitation, because this kind of facts, they are being investigated and, uh, bogatyr is not about that. they are not an investigation, therefore, to declare so unambiguously that there are signs, but not a declared nuclear activities. and that means it was not found, well, the least in the world is incompetence. this also indicates that the documents had, first of all, a political purpose. eh, and nothing else. this is what i'm repeating. here's a pro about a dirty bomb answering your question. well, a number of baths. i'm

answering my own question that i asked you, because if we immediately, e, opposed the iaea inspection, we would be immediately accused of obstructing the international objective investigation, probably, it could have been so no i i think i don't. well, in principle, in theory, probably, but most likely, they would just ignore it and that's it, as they, but in general, ah often do. they would just remain silent and pretend not to hear. uh. in my opinion. this is the most likely. well, there would be a scenario in such a case, they say meeting from the camera to the side is not so good for you. you see, oh, that's so beautiful. ah. let's discuss here's another topic . this is a question of their requirements, of course. e to release e, zaporizhia npp, e, this one the demand that is put forward to us as a guarantee

of the safety of this station, what will be said here on this subject. well, yes, the guarantee of all those things, of course, is already difficult. he is not smiling. don’t take it, well, firstly, but the topic, well, at the beginning of the resolution, they stated that, and not actually , uh, this one, but they do not recognize any changed status of any part of ukraine, and it’s not like an organization that can convert. yes, yes or not to recognize the changed state statuses of certain territories, this is one and two, which means, uh, these, to put it mildly, uh, statements related to how do they write? e, here e about e. let's just say

unreasonable. here is something on the actual, yes, unfounded claims to the ownership of the station, but again, the iaea, it is an organization not about establishing property rights. uh, other institutions do that, but definitely not magats. and now, and now the last moment, which is connected. but with them well, not the last. yes, such an important point is also connected with the appeal of the russian federation of the russian federation immediately withdraw its military and other personnel from the zaporozhye nuclear power plant so that the competent authorities of ukraine restore full control. but uh, first of all, this is a requirement, a is from the area. e. well , of course, i'm not very fond of using such strong expressions. this is more like a semantic nonsense. and

why because e means, huh? station e, i. uh, those representatives of those servicemen of the national guard who are there, they guard this station, but as a nuclear facility from any attempts of external influence. this is very important, that is, in fact with one hand, they, uh, means, or with one part of their language, they talk about the need to observe nuclear safety, and on the other hand, they call for the withdrawal, which means the military, that means representatives of the national guard, who now provide this same security about other personnel. what other staff? well, then let's clarify the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant. uh, that means that the personnel that a from the russian federation is again present there, but helps, and the ukrainian

personnel, uh, provide simple conditions tu nuclear safety itself, which is so important in the first place, and for people for humanity for society and for the rich. and here, too, absolutely well, as if one does not fit with the other, and finally, the last moment. e associated with e pressure on staff. here they write here in their resolution of the detention of ukrainian operational personnel at the zaporozhye nuclear power plant, there was not a single case of detention of representatives and operational personnel and others. uh, employees of the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant, otherwise, as a about the fact that we have already begun to call everyday life gunners.

yes, as if by tips, but which, in fact , were carried out. and thanks to which targeted, oh, very dangerous strikes were inflicted, let it be on the auxiliary, but critically important infrastructure of the director, but the stations were released, by the way, which, in theory, i would probably tell you. yes, i see. it must be admitted that our, uh, uh, uh, secret services, which they sometimes criticize for excessive harshness in relation to the ukrainian personnel of the nuclear power plant even quite obviously, those who committed a crime against the russian federation showed well , quite for me, rather amazing humanism, rather delicacy and correctness. a and. this, in general, is, as it were, proved by facts. they know the line. unfortunately, it’s still no one in the west and

rich e didn’t appreciate all our correctness and courtesy thank you very much and let me remind you that renat ivanovich was in touch with us, writhing adviser to the general director of the rosenergo concern there of the state corporation ross atom after the screen, we will continue. i decided to kill her. he said that instead of the incident he dreamed, including circumstantial evidence indicating his involvement, there was no specific material.