leonid eduardovich good afternoon well, let's start with the most important thing. how would you comment on the adoption of this resolution? just a robbery of russia, formalized at the level of a special session of the un general assembly, for almost the first time in history, the general assembly, the main international organization on the planet, the united nations formalized the basis for the reparation of the international register, damage, to which

all member countries of the united nations are called upon to create, which must be created together with ukraine here is this international register of damage and then develop a compensation mechanism. we will understand this. let's be aware of how the mechanism of forced appropriation of the property of the russian federation abroad. that is, this property will be confiscated , appropriated, taken away from russia as a sign of the damage brought to russia by ukraine, and this completely dislocated predatory mechanism is formalized by a majority vote of

the participants in the special session of the general assembly o this proves, unfortunately, that these institutions of the united nations have been hacked by the us state department and, accordingly, those countries that are in line with the united states and its foreign policy line towards a unipolar world order. where the united states will dictate to the whole world its often absolutely dislocated, as in this case, point of view, and such documents can be accepted and become documents of the united nations organization, which in this case is used as a tool by the us state department, we still, well, of course, we do not we categorically oppose this resolution and others like it, but we still stand for a multipolar world. with respect for the sovereignty of tradition and so on, each country, but at the same time, a

multipolar world implies an e world, headed by the united nations and the security council as it was after the second world war. naturally adjusted for e, modern realities and from such a multipolar world with main. the un is hard to say when it's de facto hacked the us state department at the same time. eh, many countries. i think that they are able to come to common sense, you just need to work. the more of us among them our opponents, the less of them among us we will still actively work on the platform of the general assembly. he spoke about this as a member as well. e of the russian delegation at the current session of the general assembly, approved by the president of russia although the only member of our delegation who did not receive an american visa, the

united nations is nevertheless important to us. well and with regard specifically to this resolution, which formalizes, fixes the possibility of reparation for the robbery of russia, appropriation of our own, our buildings, ours and various other objects. e in different countries of the world. this is very, very of course, it is unreasonably twisted and therefore we thank those countries that opposed it. well , the countries that abstained, they also did not want to quarrel with washington, but, uh, de facto. uh, that's 73 countries. e, which we understand object to this resolution to the great regret. we you must learn to live with you in real life when such rubbish. forgive me for a non-parliamentary expression, uh, it can be taken at the site of the united nations, therefore

, our systematic work, including in the plane of our parliamentary diplomacy, will hopefully, uh, behind the elephant so that fewer decisions of this kind are made on the main platform on the planet international organization of our relations, when on the resolution, of course, everything is negative. ah, as i understand it, the most important thing is still needed, probably, to emphasize that this decision of the un general assembly is not legally binding , i understand correctly. uh, it's not legally binding - it's a special session. this is, uh, a un document that, uh, strictly speaking, in the system of coordinates of international law, what it should be, because now we see that it is going to great regret, again, the destruction of the traditional system of international law, but

legally binding. e. this is a solution in a coordinate system. he is not at the same time, but our strategic friends, as i call them, really. let's call these things by their proper names, enemies, sworn opponents. they, uh, want to inflict on us the most serious, and reputational damage, if such a mechanism is somehow formalized and the damage is calculated. as you remember , estonia, latvia, calculated the damage under the so -called soviet occupation, if there is some international committee and another working body joint with ukraine, which, at the suggestion of kiev and washington, will calculate the allegedly inflicted russia caused damage to ukraine in the course of a special operation and so on before this inflicted in the years. when , uh, ukraine waged genocide, uh, donbass, when shells with inscriptions were flying. eh, for the children of donbass, all

this will be a mechanism. uh, damage definitions. it will be somehow calculated and formalized, suppose a similar resolution. and after that it will be created. as the text of this document says, a certain mechanism. e compensation of this tutorial, well understandable. they want to create some mechanism. which , in fact, it is not clear what will be have a legal basis. but the un security council will, in your opinion, consider this issue or not? let us imagine theoretically that yes it will be, despite the exclamations of some of our opponents. uh, russia, as a permanent member of the un security council, has the right to wind. of course , russia in the person of our successor alekseevich nebenzi. uh, similar draft resolutions are flying around on the platform of the un security council. i want, by the way, for our spectators once again. uh, to say this is not only about various real estate objects

we are also talking about our gold and foreign exchange reserves, deposits of securities, which, uh, are stored in uh, banks in other countries, credit institutions. you and i understand that all this can be frozen and confiscated. that is, in fact, with the help of the united nations, they are trying to allegedly legally rob our country and uh, it's very simple, if we have uh, he will u accept this kind of, uh, resolutions, then, of course, uh, you can to say that e in the coordinate system of the international e authority it will mean significantly less we see the voices are divided yes 94 countries for but uh 73. uh, abstained 13, if i'm not mistaken, uh, 14 14 uh against uh, a small

margin, and the united nations and the world community are split and. uh, i think that, uh , some sound work to reverse this split. eh, without utopia, perhaps the very fact that such a resolution, and a possible uno on the platform of the organization, of course, is depressing in the un security council, if such a story goes , it will, of course, be vetoed. and not only russia will impose a veto, i think that it will be against. eh, how at least, china well, as for the fact that these resolutions were adopted and unfortunately , similar ones can be accepted, e yes legal e, the force strictly speaking, legally binding this document is not a reputational blow, but a basis for those who can try to rob us. uh, our deposits are our gold and foreign exchange

reserves, and abroad and somehow real estate objects to try to forcefully appropriate such cases in the same united states have already been. but uh, what to do? these are the realities of today. today you need to work on the site united nations and continue our only correct one. line uh, denounce nazism. uh, proving his case and then more and more countries on the site. the un think it will support our approach and based on that. uh, let's work no big deal in this resolution. no, she 's annoying, she's weird. uh, because nothing like it has ever been accepted before, but no more will continue to work. and this is darchi. but you know, yes, you probably need to work with public opinion, because the same zelensky today video message at g20 well, this thing that he said is, well, jarring, i don’t know how it’s like that, and the sun rises back and, well,

it’s true for him when he said that the fracture, but in world war ii, and this is the normandy landing at 44. but this is how to understand it in general, i will put it simply, well, it’s so necessary to lay down. let us be aware that a monstrous crime is committed by ukromnots in the fields. probably everything, operations and the monstrous lie from the mouth of zelensky is not world, public opinion. this is precisely the monstrous lie from the mouth of zelensky, and it should be noted that, to our great regret. uh, this is not the first time. unfortunately, i can’t find another epithet, except as a monstrous terrible distortion of the history of the second world war. let's remember at the same time that in a number of textbooks and for the secondary school for the higher school history textbooks are already, to our great regret. the truth about the victory in world war ii is falsified. let's

remember that in poland the textbooks say something completely different, that 600.000 e, soldiers officers the red armies who gave their lives to our fathers and grandfathers for the liberation of poland from the brown plague, and not only the monuments have been dismantled, but their holy burial places are hard to even talk about, but let's e, let's tell the truth. uh, mostly in all voivodeships, destroyed in the central uh, military cemetery. warsaw is not left and our military graves and after these monstrous actions of the polish leadership. uh, these politicians were born in poland . only thanks to those soldiers and officers of the red army who then saved poland from fascism. ah, a monstrous lie. uh, zelensky, we are such a fabrication falsifying the history of the second world war. we hear not for the first time, unfortunately a number of countries. e, embarked on the path of falsifying the history of falsifying the results of the most

terrible bloody war in the history of mankind and on his shoulders. excuse the element of pathos of our generation of politicians in general dreams of figures, and learned historians are, uh, responsible for making this falsification, this , uh, collapse. uh, the story turn five. uh, can't talk about, uh, what uh, now all countries we embarked on this path, but to our great regret, the united states and the united kingdom and the baltic countries. eh, the textbooks contain precisely the monsters completely e, the opposite of the real events that led to the victory, e of the soviet people. here are the allies, of course, but the soviet people in the first place, and in the second world war, what zelensky said and today, uh, via video conference communications at the opening.

e jitvente, and the big twenty i must say that a significant part, and that same twenty , understand perfectly well that this is a lie and, uh, saudi arabia and many others. uh, the countries continue to really understand, only they are silent, and no one laid siege to him and no. we haven't seen any comments so far. thank you very much leonid eduardovich

in january of the ninety-first year, he was able to decipher the newspaper in his office, over which the british and americans fought for a whole century.

well, he, in fact, this triangle of belyaev and onin in uruguay and, of course, the knorrez of guatemala. it’s really warmer outside, we go out to warm during recess. they all blackmail gazprom like this thus, the russian leadership is well aware that russia cares about the interests of transnistria. the same

applies to damage to the economy. stopped working install open. we watch russian channels and all movie series and cartoons, educational programs and documentaries for free without registration, we watch in the application or on the website.

it will be the honest detective.

good afternoon the american method is on the air. at the end of the 18th century, the russian empress catherine ii saved the united states of america, which was then born in the fight against england, from defeat . by the british, the english king george iii

turned to the empress with a request to sell and 20,000 soldiers of officers to fight on the gray-american continent catherine refused george washington he highly appreciated this act of catherine ii and bequeathed to be grateful to the russian state for supporting the struggle for the independence of the american colonists almost 100 years have passed the middle of the 19th century the civil war between the north and the south began in the united states the southern slave-owning states supported england and france were ready to send labor troops and their own navy. and this time, the russian empire supported the northern states in new york came from the frame under the command of admiral lesovsky and stood on the outer roadstead of san francisco, another came from the frame under the leadership of admiral popov and stood on the roadstead of this city england and france

refused to participate in the conflict in this way russia's influence has preserved american statehood. and today the americans are our strategic adversary and consider us enemy number one. even china they put in second place before you will see an interview with the american economist jeffrey sachs, who is called one of the insertive people in the world. we'll show you something. elections were held in america and from the blue-blue country of the state they are gradually turning into red, this is the color of the

party affiliation of the republicans. they took a majority in the us congress, but this does not change the essence of international policy towards russia. the americans consider us an enemy; they need to give us here as a gift, this is their blue dream, and whoever is washington's leader. everything will stay the same and it was. kind uterine dopechenok does not love us. i put it mildly, he is a notorious russophobe and he is also a defender of sodomites and believes that russian values ​​and the religion of our country prevent him from living and the americans too, so we need to destroy his

anti-values ​​against our traditional values. about what a u-turn now you will see an excerpt from the fox news tv program i its leading tucker carlson, which talks about what he said in the relations of russia, these are orthodox christian countries with traditional social values. and therefore it must be destroyed. whatever it costs us. so it's not just a war. it 's jihad jamie russkin has said it loudly, but many in washington agree with him. why is this happening? and, because america is not the same, there are other values, everything is different there, you can kick the bible in the streets. look

at this, it's just disrespectful. this is a hate crime . you guys understand that you're committing a hate crime right now. if it was considered a crime, would you did not do. no she won't, what you see is a hate crime. there at the beauty contest wins something. remember how in pushkin's tale of tsar saltan, the queen gave birth on the night of either a son or a daughter, not a mouse, not a

frog, but an unknown little animal, you can’t say better than our great poet alexander pushkin what is happening now in the usa his reflections on russophobia every day the us government calls russia an enemy american media of course absolutely anti-russian towards russia today is very bad the attitude in the us and in europe the term enemy is used all the time and there is almost no dialogue between us and russian officials the relationship is such that we are essentially at

war. we are enemies. and this is how it is deposited in the public consciousness. in recent years , a lot of questions have arisen where it is necessary to negotiate president putin called for negotiations in 2021, and i really wanted them to take place, then, after all, the conflict between the two nuclear, superpowers is incredibly dangerous, this war, which is now going on very dangerously the united states committed genocide against the indians in the xix century, when america expanded from the atlantic coast to the pacific, all this territory was inhabited by indian tribes. they were expelled and genocide and this part of american history, if we talk about our time, america is a

very militaristic country for several decades, the united states has participated in many. warriors, and since my early childhood, these wars just go on without stopping. this is vietnam camboorge laos nicaragua and cancer, syria afghanistan libya is more, than enough. we obviously need a different approach. both of our parties are a heterogeneous structure, and both of them are quite numerous. as for foreign policy issues, there are always different opinions on them in both parties; two of them, i would call neoconservative, and the second peaceful. the so-called neo-conservative approach is that america should use its military power to assert

world dominance. they call it strategic dominance in every part of the world, but in every party, there is another country that says that we should be much more restrained and pursue a less aggressive foreign policy. so both of these parties are separated, but not in a conservative approach is dominant. it has been for the last 20 years, starting with the administration of george w. bush, then obama and trump. he has. true, it manifested itself in a rather unusual way. now the biden administration is taking the same approach. when it comes to economic social policy, nothing fundamentally republicans and democrats do not differ. this is very confusing for everyone, but the democratic party, for example, is characterized by a broader representation of the various.