the agreement on russia the european union does not meet the interests of poland, the polish leadership allowed itself even such scenes, and all because warsaw was outraged russia banned the waxing of low- quality polish meat, when we hear very belligerent statements from our polish colleagues, i assure you this does not help addressing issues and problems facing the polish industrial sectors of the economy. you must have heard that just a few days ago a party was arrested in berlin. uh, meat from poland and we'll see you soon my colleague ms. angela mercury and i certainly won't tell her. you don't want to. this place exists. and if you want to feed him to me, i won’t say it, but the very fact of the detention of polish meat products in berlin suggests that there is a quality problem. there is a difficulty for one of the eu members. it is a difficulty for everything. it is based

on the principle of solidarity and the problem of poland is a common european problem. the number of eu members has increased and within the eu, of course, it has become more difficult to decide. e questions that used to solved more easily. we understand this and we sympathize with the leadership of the european union. it is completely forgotten what the polish leadership proclaimed just a few years before joining the european union. in no case do we want to turn our backs on our eastern ones. to neighbors, no citizen of russia, ukraine or belarus should feel that poland has turned its back on them, because the sanctions must be very strong, which, for example, will block travel opportunities for russian citizens duda called for the dismantling of nord stream. and when it was blown up in poland, they almost rejoiced?

we decided to build a gas pipeline along the bottom of the baltic sea. well, how we offended this more, i don’t understand. this is our gas product. we want to sell it to our main consumers in europe we laid one gas transmission system across the territory of poland and did it together we regularly pay money for transit we supply poland with all the necessary energy resources, without any restrictions there was not a single failure, but we proceed from what we need to diversify. supply of energy resources to the main consumers of what is bad here what is anti-polish here? why such a reaction? how do you know we have, uh, such a children's children's riddle, a and b were sitting on the pipe, a

fell b was gone, what was left on the pipe. so it sounds like a poem. i will try to translate it literally into german, it will not sound like in russian, and he is a villain. i want to say by this that we are not squeezing anyone out of our e-energy affairs in europe, we are we have great respect for the economic interests of our partner trans-country countries and their geopolitical position, believing that they have played and will play a significant role in the energy dialogue in europe, but we also reserve

the right to protect our interests. of course, you can swear with each other without ceasing, or you can sit down at the negotiating table and sort out the problem. to understand the motives of behavior of each of the parties . to take into account the interests of each other, someone wants to present it as some kind of anti-polish decision. there is no anti-polish overtones here. we have built one pipeline system through the territory of poland. but this is a normal thing when we, together with the main consumers in europe, want to diversify these transport systems. what is here, uh, unusual. this is a normal practice all over the world, we are counting on understanding the slippery side, but warsaw interfered with the project in every possible way and no longer gave the appropriate permission there, but despite this, all the participants in the project remained. everyone wants to work. well, when is the nord stream at all blew up then what was the reaction?

thanks to the united states and this writes a little a lot of the former minister of foreign affairs of poland, who also played one of the key roles in the ukrainian tragedy, guaranteeing a peaceful resolution of the crisis on the maidan 3 of foreign affairs. the european countries of poland , france and germany signed this agreement as guarantors of the observance of this document. at the same moment, our american partners turned to us. they asked us to do it. all i now say almost verbatim request, so that yanukovych does not use the army, so that the opposition vacates the area of ​​the administrative building and does not proceed to the implementation of the agreements reached. e about normalization. we said okay. a day later, a coup d'état took place. well , at least they would call, at least they would do something, or the minister of foreign affairs, and the european countries of

germany-poland and france did not have to put their signatures as guarantors of compliance with the agreement between the government and the opposition, or, if they did, it was necessary to achieve their implementation, not get rid of it. yes, that's all. during the maidan, it was polish politicians who were one of its main driving forces , the twin brother of the deceased president. yaroslav kachinsky held a rally on the side of the opposition ukraine has long haunted poland from the sea home the sea before the second world war is not enough. they said it was an idea to fix the baltic sea to the black sea now we see, but she lived there with uh leaders in poland and ukraine. the idea of ​​the absorption of ukraine it has not gone away just like the idea of ​​returning those territories that were after the second world war, large areas of large areas from romania were torn away from poland

and hungary were torn away from us. it was no coincidence that i said in valdai that the only real true guarantor of ukrainian statehood and sovereignty could be russia, which also gave ukraine its historical territory, but voluntarily in order to create a single common cultural humanitarian space and historical father of the territory, about which i just said above they were forcibly traded from hungary to romania and poland are completely different situations about it. some people should think , including in ukraine. but this bandera leadership thinks, probably, only, uh, mostly money that is hidden in western banks. without thinking about the possible consequences of what is happening today. we are relatives, between us there

should be no border or barriers of the border of russia without stopping. now, in a stream through poland to ukraine, western weapons are coming here to numerous polish mercenaries. poland has actually become almost the main center of the natopai, good luck thank you for your incredible leadership for your strong leadership for such a strong voice of the united states that leads us ukraine continues to sink in blood and the point of reference, of course, the coup d'état at the g20 summit lavrov recalled and told how everything was under the united states and their allies during the discussions were noted, er, rather aggressively, accusing russia of what they say is unprovoked aggression against ukraine in general. you know, the more often they say

unprovoked aggression, the more. everybody they are convinced that it is provoked just by aggression, but is a protection operation. the legitimate security interests of russia on the borders of which military threats were created for our country and is an operation to protect the russian population of donbass, what would the uk do if ireland banned the english language, there were no answers. as you understand, many g20 leaders know all the answers in advance, this summit set a record. how often was the word russia and poland again ahead of everyone officially offers to replace russia in the top twenty, warsaw, of course, supported the recent resolution of the general assembly. he is on reparations to ukraine and understandably. with what money they would like to make it out of

the reserves stolen from russia, the resolution has no legal force, therefore we regard it honestly as a political statement that will not be continued. many participants of the twenty and did not support closely. western countries blame russia for everything but this is how president erdogan reacted when he saw the microphone of the russia tv channel, he stopped listening to english, he waited for the translation from english into turkish and that's what answered only our program to the question of attempts to isolate russia , pray. the price will be endless, and this price is being paid more and more by europe, and along with it, by poland. pavel , is there a real eventful marathon on the agenda of the president next week? in cuba, he has scheduled talks with the russian leader and the opening of a monument to fidel in moscow. also this week,

putin flies to yerevan for a csto summit meeting of the leaders of the organization in conditions of extreme international tension and is extremely important. so i want to emphasize this for many years, painstaking work gives results, in addition to this, next week sberbank is holding another forum on artificial intelligence putin in it. in recent years. always involved the influence of new technologies is already felt by every person whoever becomes a leader in this area will be the ruler of the world new technologies are the strong point of the russian tax service, which is considered one of the best in the world the president will congratulate its employees on the day of tax authorities and this is only a partial list of events that are in the president's plan for 7 days, the most complete and interesting story is only in our sunday program. thank you appeared, yes next week, and with the audience, well see you after a short break in the studio on sunday evening.

the hypocrisy of the west has crossed all conceivable boundaries this week. first, russia was accused of the fall of a ukrainian missile on the territory of poland, now it is trying to hush up this to legalize the mockery of russian prisoners of war, so it answers dryly. what is studying videotape, and some western media openly take the side of the coronazis and come up with an excuse for them. let me just show you so you can understand what i'm talking about, look here. what , for example, did he say? i don't want to show a shot

of the murder of our guys. i think you know this, it's probably even somewhat immoral. well, it's just for loved ones to see the death of their loved ones. these are tough tests. i want to show you what the bbc russian writes and here is the text that they issue they ask questions. this is a war crime and explains that no, that he really is, because it was a feigned issue of captivity. that is why it is not a war crime, however, a false task of capturing is also contrary to the rules of war, writes the bbc russian service is not accidentally banned in russia because by and large. this abomination is comparable. eh, let's say what was the name of e. bio-bakhter, as it was initially the same, that is, the air force is an absolutely nazi

propaganda leaflet, and considering that now england is sending e as assistance to ukraine lighters on which glory to ukraine was won by the hero of glory well, send the remaining stock of the thirties you lit with haylik. here is everything else. you always loved the nazis, british scum. here is what ivan yakuvina writes, an imitation of surrender to lure the enemy into open areas. this war crime is forbidden. let's hope that this story will become a different science, but at the same time, it's interesting how the ukrainian narrative, which would pick up the conversation , picked up, of course, the bild. so bill which is an absolute goebbels leaflet and which should be banned in russia as a bright mouthpiece of german nazism, so that no one has

any illusions, bills should be declared, like the bbc and the russian service, as nazi accomplices of rubra, nazism, our opposition here tried to prove themselves like normal people. it was difficult for them, but they tried navalny, his team wrote an absolute monstrous video. the ukrainian soldiers shot 12 russian soldiers further down the lena. immediately received in the face from the ukrainians and removed your view. because who pays the money to the reserves there is no navalny from his crowdfunding, 5 absolutely obvious work of western intelligence services and that's it. this is scum that has to do with the structure. for some reason, navalny, who is still sitting, is not at all according to those for which he should be convicted; he should be convicted of treason . a month with all its shoy. well, they immediately

received an order from their curators and deleted the text. this is for all those of our guys who probably think that delicious ukrainian borscht is waiting for someone in captivity, as some citizen in the comments the only chance for a russian soldier to survive is to surrender to the ukrainians zelensky called for this delicious borscht. a russian soldier is captured only when seriously wounded or shell- shocked unconscious. this is what you can understand. and if you have a weapon with ammunition, if you give up, damn it, doubts are soldiers? big doubts waiting for you execution should not be illusions. there were no such atrocities

. back the only type of torture they claim about. don't wait for the west to condemn. crime against our soldiers no, the west is expanding all war crimes terrorist attacks of the kiev regime. on wednesday, the european parliament will vote on a draft resolution on the recognition of russia as a tourist state based on this i do not understand at all. why do people suddenly appear in the structure of the ministry of foreign affairs who declare. no, this is not the purpose of declaring ukraine a tourist state. maybe he will take care of his own affairs, which is not very good, it turns out it is not included, if i understand correctly, it is within the competence of the foreign ministry to

declare or not to declare someone a terrorist kingdom leonid i'm telling the truth, of course, this is simply not their area of ​​​​competence, so maybe they will leave official comments to maria vladimirovna zakharova and the rest before they declare something, but they will think a little. there is the minister of foreign affairs, deeply, dear brilliant russian diplomat and service, who make official comments, the rest can do their work. ai it is clear that the west wants us to not be clear what they are preparing, the rupture of depot relations, the withdrawal of frozen russian assets. no, there is no fire of non-freezing europe in europe while it is not even close to cold, they have now accumulated too much gas back. yes, we should not care much about what is happening inside europe, we should be much more concerned about what is happening on our side, what we do, how we do the american will help in europe to the end,

more precisely, not in europe, ukraine why is this a dream for them and the main geopolitical enemy. who fights with brothers, on whose blood they turned their heads with the ukrainian nazis. how many will they you want to substitute money, because even the total package of assistance to ukraine, which is now over 50 billion, is still destroyed, compared to the general budget . so we need to draw more. but he also headed our roskosmos. and now we have a bunch of questions. well, where are the satellite constellations? why is there a whelan, a starling mask, yes, who are actively working in the interests of? ukrainian nazis

i asked a question and got a very specific answer. listen in 2015 in the month of december, and a few months before the implementation ten-year federal space program. it e cost as a result of all reductions from two trillion 800 billion rubles. it eventually reached the level of 1 trillion 46 billion rubles. and then the president told me that yes, we understand that it is impossible to go lower, because the degradation of the industry will begin, nevertheless. here from this amount from one trillion 400 six billion rubles, and emphasized for a ten-year period. and this is 20 times less than nasa received every 20 times. yes, and that is, from this period. for these even the first years slaughtered immediately 350 million rubles. to whom is the question? fuck well, we connect with shit and sticks will make a spacecraft. this is despite the fact that even under the conditions of e-e sanctions, when e spacecraft

consists of components from 95%, this is a radiation-resistant electronic component base emphasized by a gravitational rack electronics is the most expensive category industrial space and unfortunately, in our country, well microelectronic industry, let's say soft position, so we do not produce, and all deliveries are blocked; moreover , all channels through which they were still mined before the fourteenth year. they are all under the most severe control of the special services, and therefore there were no components from the west. you understand how to create an orbital constellation under these conditions, so that's a plus. as they say, there is no e here, the apparatus is to blame for the development of speech. you said two reasons , the first one is not financed. not only the next, but the second absence of an order, that is, the military did not formulate or place an order for the creation of such

groupings. you understand what's the matter. here, see the same enterprises produced spacecraft , as for roscosmos itself. well, in the interests of the civilian component, so for our established customer of the ministry of defense. probably it was necessary in the conditions that developed after the fourteenth year under the sanctions. i say it again, i constantly talked about it, so it was necessary to give. uh, the question of creating space vehicles at the mercy of. as a matter of fact, an industry, because then it i would suggest, but some options are based on availability. e those, e opportunities. yes, the same electronics that are available, which could be. strictly speaking, e form to form carbidium groupings. well, we made people both for volodya's customers and for customers, we made devices that are comparable in their characteristics. pick up the devices. it was just necessary to replicate these civilian developments and not share the order for

civilian military in wartime conditions depended. well, this is a common problem. in fact, in general, the problem of planning. well, here is the question, of course, to the customer, including, first of all, well, the third problem. i have already said that this is the availability of microelectronics, which is also a huge problem for creating a spacecraft. so what are our problems now? they stayed. look at what austin says catches. remind you, he is not the secretary of defense , he is the secretary of defense, the united states can determine the course of global security in this new table? no opportunity to transfer this time. what is at stake is stability and prosperity on both sides of the atlantic ladies and gentlemen. nato will defend it against the alliance. he is not looking for confrontation russia is not a threat to russia

i'm on a picolat vacation offensive grim new early instability of chaos and war. that the russian invasion is an opportunity to appreciate the possible world of the tyranny of upheaval, in which none of us wants to live slowly, says he is interesting. he is interesting because he says, we will give ukraine what it wants, what is rammstein gathered before ukraine give out their wishlist, everyone says to get, and we have and we have a front. you can say directly quickly as long as you need. or he gets into the most complex bureaucratic mechanisms. evaluation is underway. looks at how much

it costs. applies there. applies here from one. well, i talked there with people who know how to relate to this, so that the microwave is a new sniper rifle, but it went into service to replace the svd which i'm sorry my age is a couple of months older than me. and still they are not enough just one type of weaponry, this is normal. especially in the conditions of hostilities, when it is necessary here and now, it is no coincidence that the president said. that the needs of the front must be met directly instantly is to hear what people need at the front. but we are with you as i understand it. this week could be the last in the history of mankind. we were practically on the brink of a world nuclear war, and this is absolutely a small stretch, but i now want to

this plot to return rogozin. why because we don’t just say, but the anti -satellite e-e of the satellite, or rather the orbital constellation, because here you can add glory to allah ambiguously and the fact that today they are doing the american stalinink, which we helped there together, including some aspects they were also given to create ukrainians at the service of their military operations.

we'll take care of this. it will be the honest

detective. i am a skomorov before rogozin, who headed

roskosmos before that avtovaz headed. yes we are spoke then. so he came to us thinking, and that's about the same thing, why do i come back to this? here he speaks, dmitry rogozin from the fifteenth year, and until the fifteenth he came to our house and speaks. you know, well, the ministry of finance is forcing me, and then he discounts everyone's program by 30 percent. well, i can’t remove something with a rocket by 30%, this is saying, this is now being said by the scientific representative of the president. why do i remember this to the fact that, unfortunately, this approach, it is preserved now, because an accountant. come on, i say this without humiliation, he is an accountant, like an accountant at any enterprise, he wants to do all this. it's good that now the army,

as it were, was singled out. we are all in the budget this time the budget has just formed, but uh, who forms this application? it's not for nothing that you ask this question. and why didn’t the ministry of defense give you an application for the creation of a satellite? no, he says, in fact, trying not to offend. well, the customer, well, there had to be industry. i understand that now it was not what he was not allowed to do when he was a state. and now you are putting these accents correctly, not even whether these people are in demand there now or not. they will certainly be in demand such as they say, but the fact is that now we need to quickly change all this, because america also functions according to certain bureaucratic laws. you say they give, they give. they're making rifles fast or whatever. they are. well, you are right. what's there? is being done eh? 50 at once different, which each time two by three by five there.