it's good that now they have sort of been assigned to the army. we are all in the budget this time the budget has just formed, but uh, who forms this application? it's not for nothing that you ask this question. and why didn’t the ministry of defense give you an application for the creation of a satellite? no, he says, in fact, trying not to offend. well, the customer, well, there had to be industry. i understand now on the line of battle. contact was not something he was not allowed to do when he was a state. and now you are putting these accents correctly, even it’s not about whether these people are in demand there now or not, they will definitely be in demand like that, but the point is that we need to quickly change all this now, because america also functions according to certain bureaucratic laws. you say they give, they give. they quickly make rifles or there that no one else has. well, you're right rammstein, what's going on there, uh, 50 50 different states, which each will give

two by three each conventional weapons. well, it's just physically ahead in this regard. and why do they move on themselves in conventional weapons? because that's how it happened. uh no, where can there be a conventional arms treaty? i'm not in it now, what's stopping us. now. i know that mishustin's team is there. sobyanin does. everything possible to work as it should. we must produce many times more shells there. but a few fields are correct, but they are not made quickly the same reason why they make everything alive. that is, he said, russia needs 10 years for re-equipment. here in this speech. yes, he said, they do not want to give us these actions of the communists. we need to run then. do you remember his famous expression to run in 10 years, in which we will leave 100 years. we're falling behind, we're falling behind. well, not in a year to run in a day, yes, and we need some time there. it is not necessary

to act for several months at times it requires concentration, efforts, of course, will, but for you you must clearly understand what the front needs. well, how much information should come in not distorted, exactly, of course, and in this regard, i return to the agenda, about which you asked me a question, i visited the urals, the great city of yekaterinburg said that the industrialists there, well, the men there are amazing, that is, well, this is real. here are those who are engaged in business, they go around the yeltsin center. this is such a pride of the nation, a large plant with its own money, because the state did not allocate an order with its own money. people are engaged in developments that are needed with might and main in front of their director says. let me agree there. this is half my life invested his. well, what was from the citizenship of the sector went to the military, and there are many such people. i, unfortunately. how many times have we given an example. here i am in tolyatti as businessmen. well, why does he say i have to find an optical sight, well , it won't be now. i want to go back to the

ones you asked. yes, this week was very, uh, seriously uh dangerous for that slide of the second world war. it's not that the provocations that the ukrainians staged there or with the poles or separately the poles or there, the west as far as it was immersed the fact is that in fact this is a great danger and the first and second world wars began banal just ordinary banal. provocations yes, the banality is that he shot there, besides the prince, there are serbian nationalists, or it means, uh, in polish uniforms, the germans changed clothes, and there they entered the radio station and blew up the second one, that is, a banal reason is needed in order to explode then, as it were this this occasion, but now i’m not even talking about who then what, which means that the west proved everything there, the ukrainians of the ukrainian missiles, but about how we behaved in russia in this situation on the one hand. we say, yes, not ours. yes, well, well, while every politician tried to declare. no, no, no, definitely not ours with 300. well, definitely

not. it was we who saw it with a sboing, how it was like the dpr means, and i would like a different reaction, here is the turkish one, about which you are talking now, tell me , what is already exploding in belgorod, already in orel and in kursk, not european ammunition. are they not european 155 and above millimeters, which means they are whose and the hammers are whose and today three sevens whose they are already exploding in our territory. i should say i would be in place, lavrov is there peskov to say listen, yes, we have been carried away now, but generally speaking, listen. well, we crossed there at one time, we created red laziness, which means they brought us closer, but then you must understand that we are carrying these rockets across the polish border. we will have to, uh, once again they say that we must cross it out, well, the rocket can fly away and not there anymore, what we have with

you yes, i will say more. right now there on at the turn of the match, the criminal ukrainian speech is not audible, continuous prologues of polish english things. yes, and where is the guarantee that russian territories are being shelled, you know, not polish mercenaries, go for it, yes, once again you don’t have to. i hope that for many years already after the death of ilyukhin i have been returning to poland. i even spoke in the polish sejm on the subject of why you have become attached to us with this shack with these four thousand polish officers allegedly tortured there by stalin, when you didn’t say a word or a word talk about sixty thousand prisoners of war prisoners of war red army soldiers who came to you in the twenties of the last century and you simply tortured them out of sixty thousand returned 1,500 people returned. all the rest died. you are talking about these guys who were shot from the same story. they shot them, tortured them, mocked them. well, only when they didn’t shoot on video, because there wasn’t a video, so

i passed in polish about ours and was captured, of course, now shoot and then i speak to everyone said, what are you talking about, here i am, as a communist, i tell you. and where and how to answer? or are you for this while i was a delegation and so on, which, well, i will not now remember the names of very high-ranking people, which you know. there's a document, while you're not on you documents on controversial issues of history, more of us attacked, they attacked, they took the prosecutors, our prosecutor's group, which investigated this case , invited us to join us. moreover, the poles are not publicly worried, because i am now looking to volodya. no, i will explain now, because i i see something at the coronazit, who is shouting, there are all bandera slogans, the poles joyfully help, betraying in memory of the victims of the volyn massacre. yes, that is, here they somehow add up. well, i remember, this is not because i once again want to say about our long-term position, yes, in the house, but because with

them there can be a different language, only that israel and its leaders of the early leaders preached a different language, not ukrainians not poles. not that the more europeans do not accept. you, we are with these terrorists, so i look another statement. we will punish everyone. we're all on koda yes, we'll be tweaking. let's run, we will contain no or no official statement should be from unofficial. this is how private organizations mean that we will destroy you all, we will destroy you, like those terrorists who shot the olympians there, for example, which means that i say the performers will be afraid of them too. will you be afraid? well, yes, we draw red lines in green. well, put them on twenty here, returning to the second story on twenty, not

embarrassed already, zelensky says, from his twenty-minute speech, that no minsks can count on friction for two, and at this time poroshenko says, yes, we just deceived the russians. and why russian places are doing well. why is zelensky behaving like this? because he is allowed to, because on the front line we, of course, have an overwhelming advantage. well, you see, the fact is that they persuaded a decisive defeat at the coronation with the army. they will be rude to us, and in order for this victory to be ours, we need to look at ourselves carefully. yes, for i must answer this. to do this, you need to give the army. everything. we are ready to once again declare our position there, a statement, which means the dkb. i decided not to let lavrov in. wait, this is what i want to tell you. katya means, even lavrov lived there and so on, but i say, why were created, for example, mgt. and what it gives us to russia, this is what it gives russia. in addition to the fact that they exercise control over us,

this organization does not give us anything else, just like the uzkho, which was discussed here yes, before that, they forced us to destroy all chemical weapons then they didn’t destroy my question to uh, miidu to our structures to the president. let's at least suspend our participation. i agree there, we’ll stop and say we won’t work according to your rules, you make most of the decisions that are for us, then they will definitely rage in the right way, these actions are all right, all the entrepreneurs, wine, stop playing and the last russia will not wake up and the last volodya i want you to often watch the program at your place all the time , and look for some means, search for some philosophy of the new religion. it's for the elite, maybe it's interesting, right? martists, huh? yes, i want to say the state is arranged. there is no other cryptomatic one. i respect you for that means, uh,

not only for that, of course, uh, but the world hasn't come up with anything else. there is capitalism, there was socialism without capitalism, now there is socialism with elements of capitalism in china. well, there is also capitalism with elements of socialism, for example, norway, sweden, so they just didn’t come up with anything else, and we have to decide. here we are in we should bring russia where we are going all the time, china, and how we ourselves remained in this deep dense capitalism and sit in it. how many times have i told you? well, they don’t take revenge from us and cut down the gas tariff, although within the country within the country, she no longer forces anyone to get out of this, or rather. suspend, but do not do it this is a task, about whom you are talking about, i realized that it is a problem, because there are no these guys cheers at which you traveled, they will produce products for a penny or they are not in this problem is that it is you said me, and you had to speak to the government. i say i'm glad to applaud you too, understand. yes,

look, here's a reference to the moscow kremlin putin was the plot valentinovich mantra says that now 42%, this avtovaz is your favorite i hmm pavel say to my lead author. well, now the front needs a large number of armored vehicles, including small ones; people have colossal activities for avtovaz and the state market is difficult. i worked those small series was. the new version of the tanks of rostovites 30 years ago, i would like to warmly support this idea right now, if we are talking about what probably hinders us. today. i'll go back to, uh, last sunday's past broadcast and i want to say that the new economic ideology. here it

can be considered from two sides, and it is very relevant today. let's look at it from below at this new economic ideology. why are we missing today? so we need to take bureaucratic uh barriers, they are obvious today on the state budget on the order that the front is today orders need to be delivered urgently. how to do it? we just need to analyze what is there, and what is there, for example, uh, so that you participate in from uh, in the production of any product. you have to prove your competence in this production. well, if we understand today that we need to replace thousands of products today, and we have never done this before. so this is a position, so it immediately buries. they bury the possibility of attracting private capital, which is ready to do it, but does not have the competence to remove her when we talk about the fact that we need money, well, understandable. what collaterals are pledges eco future enterprise, do not be afraid of this e loan without collateral, because he pledges the future enterprise, which will check the state 2-3%, uh, the maximum discount rate. and now

let's see, we also once talked about this. we are worried that private capital is hired by the state. decided to steal money. well, i decided to steal. and why do we think about him like that, where do they come from guilt, and guilt and the absence of the presumption of innocence in this issue. why is it not enough that there is currency control and you can’t take money out, and secondly, even if they steal quickly, today there are a lot of regulatory authorities. and who forgets that today the government, in the head with mishustin, is already practically implementing the figures for the implementation of the economy, and, accordingly, the digitalization of the economy is a complete marking of the movement of money. and for to understand where we need first of all the state planning commission and, accordingly, what the front needs today this is what enterprises are doing right away , the prospect for several years is being determined, funding is being determined, and here you just need to return to a very understandable topic. that's all that we understand from below, that we need to remove the bureaucracy,

the second i will finish with the topic of theft again. eh, so we must understand with you that people are not born. for this they are born for another. and even if we assume that with you some money is sent to the economy, it will not be effectively used. this is not a problem for the state, because it is impossible to 100% guarantee the result only those who want to save themselves insist on this. sometimes people are told to cover up something. why, because 100% results are impossible. we do not know what kind of product is guaranteed. more will be done, i will not give an example to put it simply. i lost we need we need. we need to manufacture several types of products. run three enterprises for one type of product for what, so that we can competitively choose the most efficient and not be afraid of losses. let's see what we need. first in 10 trillion rubles a year will be spent on investments many people are talking about this and the government. uh, provides for the appointment of the economy. these are 7-8 trillion. it seemed that, probably, the economy would be able to digest this amount. but, if we assume

that 20% of this amount was inefficiently used, it melted like the wind, but let's compare the gold and foreign exchange reserves, which today are equivalent to 20 or 25 trillion. well, is it really 20% of 10,000,000, that is, two trillion comparable to the figure that is already frozen today, so any investment directed to the economy should not be afraid of this. she must uh, she must work for the economy itself. now let's look at the top. here we go to the central bank in the state duma reported some financial policy. let's start with the fact that today the central bank, according to the constitution, is not an author who has to report any. all policy. this should be done by the government, if the central bank does it, it does this by virtue of what it has. in addition to the functions written in the constitution, there is also a law on the central bank. this is dual power. it is necessary to remove, of course, the most vivid desire there to subordinate the central bank to the government. but it’s probably difficult, but let’s then look at and write down the function of the central bank, the task of the socio-economic development of

the country, and then, perhaps, it will influence the banking system, based on the fact that there will no longer be a profit for the purpose of banking activity. system, and the achievement of certain results in socio-economic development countries, and then politics will play itself differently. if it is impossible to completely involve the central bank, liquidate or limit its independence. let's give some of the functions of the central bank, that is, we will transfer the mission to the government through those state-owned banks that can directly manage the government or through development institutions that are already formed within the government today, thus we will ensure the functioning of the economy, saturation with money and remove this duality that interferes. and it is possible to saturate the front products and thereby not so, after all, in than today the lack of saturation of the front, that we have a huge number of enterprises being mortgaged or can be mortgaged, but today, well , in the sense that something is being built in the bank, they are starting to build something, but there are not enough funds, which are limited to the need to go through a huge number of approvals.

no, if there are honest companies that are ready to work, they must be accredited, as i understand it, in certain structures, that we are allowed to work with what has arms relations. we now have guys dragging everything from china that's what was said, what karen georgievich said, they are slowed down there, and they say, you're like, that we drag the plates . transfer the functions of control to this central committee for body armor to decide this on its own and saturate it with money and give permission. and most importantly, make a decision on your own and respond to the necessary front, that's all, but this is possible only when the new economic idea plays in all its colors. and when we talk about what today the central bank reports and that's it. the rest we are talking about is discussing the same things that happened before, well, we resisted, well, we stood there, well, this is not enough. the problem is that so far. in my opinion, some believe that all the costs are for the military-industrial complex and for the army. this is money thrown away. that is, for them it is all the honor of lost

money. and why? and it turned out that if you do not allocate here, you will not have a country, because there is an idea that what is the effectiveness of the development of our state. it's not profit profits, and the development of the country. and it is possible only when you saturate the resources. here i am , for example, today we pay quite a lot of money to the mobilized. we pay a lot of social benefits. we are developing new territories - this is the saturation of the money supply, but we need to produce goods for them. well, why is it not enough to be embarrassed in our budget, but there is no need to let out a military commissar for this, but the military commissar is food, and on what does it revise it correctly, the military commissar meets those civilian enterprises that will work for all this and for this it is necessary to simplify the procedure as much as possible; there is no need to be afraid nothing will happen, in addition to the fact that we are on the market with a huge number of goods. here i said i was making a story with me now thanks to denis, there solovyov

is doing a mantra there on a regular basis. well, because well, russian industrialist well, this is the feeling in the city. indeed, as long as the young guy or what to say, here he is doing fantastic. there helmets yes, well, this is an armor helmet from this is correct to say, the atlas is called the company. i say, listen here people were not taken away from you when the mobilization began, because the main thing is that it limits them. this is the quality of the workers. he says, well, we fought very hard asking to at least our staff. no, they didn’t pick them up right away according to the police list, because, well, how it works, but the way his company is not included in the list of companies, although they do what is terribly in demand, then, therefore, they had to be there, well, thanks to mishustin, because they more or less, these issues began to be resolved, but we need to react in a completely different way. it is necessary to quickly clearly oppose us 50% world economy, so all our

bureaucratic chickens. you have to be polite, they say, the communists will help a lot, as always, they demand to replace everything with their own, you ruined us in one more direction. yes, yes, the bolsheviks, yes, they saved the country. so what, but don’t pay attention, you didn’t save in moscow in the nineties, i wasn’t in moscow, here are people who half weren’t in moscow, didn’t come out in moscow at that moment. in america, he was with you in the central committee then why not ask or not? he yes and he favors help printed. help gennady andreevich and there were few of them, which were few in general. yes, the rest of me are all compromisers. your documents are your yakovlev member polish. well, yes, yeltsin candidate members of the finger,

bureau, you were a candidate, but not in the politburo. well, there were members of the central committee of the cpsu, but there was a central committee by age. the cpsu was trying to change you was not given a place. i'm just as sporty you are a little bit in the nineties, like zyuganov well, i'm sorry, the responsibility for the collapse of the soviet union lies entirely with the communist party of the soviet union with you on those same yeltsins, they once again ask the communist party of the russian federation is the successor to the cause of the cpsu , the successor to the cause of the communists, yes, the cpsu is the successor or not, the bolsheviks are the successor. once again i ask you this party of the cpsu, but the bolsheviks. i can get a simple answer from russian railways

, we are the successor, of course, we are also the attitude towards god, in principle, the successor to the successors of the ussr is, and sir, it was called differently at different times, for example, the russian federation in 18, you can answer just the question of the kpr is whether this is the case the decision is including the responsibility of your man is a muscovite? i knew all of moscow for how long, he became a muscovite, when feeder became the head of the cpsu of the city of moscow, i will participate in the final part of your dispute in general, it seems to me that we should stop referring to the past all the time, this has also become with us. it’s everyone around us who is to blame, then lenin, so to speak, didn’t do something in his time, didn’t

divide it in such a way. it’s not that stalin did it wrong, then nicholas ii, then peter i in short, uh, then even gorbachev yeltsin is to blame. come on guys, it's been 30 years . everything is enough, enough for everything that happens, we answer. we are the current current political system. and the people who work in it today and they are different for this they make mistakes. they overcome mistakes. when they can overcome, but it is not necessary to be responsible for it. all the time to refer to the fact that there was once something because of this, everything happened. yes, it is clear in this world he is one time is infinite and all events cling to one for the other, this is all clear, but this is philosophy. this is true metaphysics geopolitics there, i don't know, but today there is today and specifically what is happening today in our lives we are already responsible for this. we are carried by the current generation of

politicians and that's all, yes, in order for me to think in this sense, we must already stop blaming everything on the previous ones all the time. as if they were not unpleasant. this is another question. but he must understand, so to speak, that the current situation is a situation for which the current political figures and russian foreign ones are responsible, and as they say, it seems to me here it is necessary to reconcile on this, and then eh. accordingly, it means solving problems. here i read an interesting one, i read it sometimes, but you can’t forget the origins either. let's not forget the historians. we will never forget. although sometimes such problems are sometimes useful to cut off. everything is useful sometimes. i do this all the time in my personal life . you know it works. sometimes you

cut once you start. that's it. so okay, it's like my personal experience, and i do not impose on anyone. simply expresses. in short, i read it here. it is interested in military affairs, i read a lot about it. well, now i also read an interesting one, so napoleon remember his famous campaign in egypt. yes , in principle, considered unsuccessful, since the expeditionary force. although he defeated the local there, the ottoman egyptian army. everything, but the british cut him off from france, he then fled, by the way, without blinking an eye, he left this expeditionary force, but this is not the point of anything else interesting. the statement intrigued me. he's writing. he speaks an arab warrior. he dealt with arabs. says the arab warrior is far

superior to the french soldier. he is much better at it. riding an evil beautiful rider perfectly owns the weapon of the arab troops is worth two french soldiers. and then he writes 10 arab arabs worth 10 french soldiers. then he writes 100 french, wait, 1,000 developers. 1,000 french is worth 10,000 arabs 10,000 french, well, soldiers. and why do i say all this to that, whatever it is, whatever the quantity , organization and discipline are of great importance. without it there can be no military success and the actual organization - this concerns, er, in the conditions of modern warfare. by the way, this is starting a

little who writes about it. although there is a very interesting study. uh, napoleon was not just a really outstanding commander, whom we are proud of. we defeated russia. well, nevertheless, he was an outstanding organizer; his strength was in the extraordinary organization of his army. somehow i happened to read this somehow. it's amazing how everything was, he delved into every stage, because the army is the most complex mechanism from the army was no less complex than we are now, because these are horses. this is fodder, these are carts. this is communication, this is everything, he brought everything, and this whole machine was also a state machine, because napoleon was also an outstanding organizer of the state. her francs in his during his period, as they say, uh, she was unusually organized. the entire bureaucratic system was extraordinarily

organized and tuned to a given military footing. that was the guarantee that he was 15 years. in general, it must be said that he nightmareted europe until i stumbled upon, uh, our beautiful homeland, which, in general, broke this this this this car. what i'm talking about is that, uh, it's impossible to succeed. we lived without this organization without this organization. here you are talking here and we are constantly. i hear this all the time. i understand from this that there is no iron organization in the country. she she is not she is not created. well, at the same time, it’s quite difficult to keep the victory, given the real enemy that we are fighting today, still, there is a feeling that a we want to create some kind of illusion that, in general, this is, as it were, a real operation, but this is not an operation. it 's really a big war.

perm was a capable person

heart of parma