yes, don't go for the stone. no, it will not. belongs to me i will kill them all. scary

this is a big war, and it really requires a very serious concentration of the nation, of course, it requires very bold and bold decisions, of course, it is clear that it requires a different, apparently, organization and army, because after all, everything that we today we hear a lot about our army about this, he says, this is the question. not only armament is a question not only not not only uh, hmm not only not only lack of personnel, so to speak, it is, well apparently worth it. in my opinion. these are both

organizational and discipline issues. i don't really understand how it is possible, in the conditions of hostilities , to have medical discipline without having military tribunals. to be honest , i don't understand it. well, that's how life works, that's how the army works. i'm not saying that we have to shoot, and they propose to introduce decimations, as in ancient rome, this time is understandably gone, but i mean that certain ones should. i don't know how this exists in the russian army. i didn't hear. i heard that the russian army does not there is a watch, for example, as it was in the soviet army that they were canceled, you understand? i don't hear it. i don't really understand, but that's how it works, warfare. that's how the army works. it inevitably requires a certain rigidity and severity in this sense, by the way, with regard to this terrible case with the execution of our

prisoners of war, it probably makes sense to recall the experience that the soviet union had. i think the satisfied part, which in which responsibility which ukrainian in the area of ​​​​responsibility that this food occurred cases, and she, probably, should suffer the fate of the same regiment in which zoya kosmodemyansky was executed, if you remember there was an order that the officers and soldiers of the regiment in which kosmodemyanskaya was responsible for the execution were not taken prisoner. and this, by the way, had a serious impact on the health of our soviet prisoners of war to a certain extent. although she treated them terribly, nevertheless, the brains of others began to work, because it ’s seriously better to be captured and not engage in crimes than they do this, but i seems to be something serious. in general , tough decisions in this sense, because we all

the time see some kind of no no no no no no no no some, relaxed. here in this case, we talk all the time about there were those who do not want to do anything. well guys, well, we have. so to speak, the mechanism of persuasion, we have the mechanisms of persuasion. well, there are mechanisms, but they are not applied. we have some we have power. power, i must say, the people have delegated quite serious power to our powerful e structure, but, in principle, it must be applied in some way. i have said many times. i love american cinema very much, but i cannot understand why it is broadcast on all channels, they will stop soon. this is just incomprehensible to me. well then then the question, apparently, apparently, in general, this is a common deep mood, we want to watch american cinema, i read it. eh, i don't know, it's true, it's not true, but just in general, it means

eighty percent. and the past. for example, i think that it is necessary to cancel the new year holidays in the form in which they are. that is, oh return, there thirty-first spent one day christmas everything, goodbye, because i i do not understand for me. in general, i am purely sick, i really relate to the fact that i understand that our soldier officers are constantly suffering. this terrible suffering is what they are experiencing. now winter is still winter, we who served in the army knows what what is service in winter, and what is war in winter and at this moment that we will ski in krasnaya polyana? well guys, well, some. well , some. well, i was surprised to see that in general eighty percent are against abolishing these issues on vciom issues. for me, this is some kind of such, to a certain extent, a blow, or what? i understand then that i understand that country. in general, she, as it were, seems to want to win, but it seems to be so to say that it doesn’t

cost anything, but it doesn’t happen, especially in this one, really in this conflict. and we must, it seems to me, determine this, and i guess it is this power that we need to say in some way , in general. it is strange that after kherson we didn't hear anything there, i don't know. i certainly ca n't not necessarily the president, he says, well, maybe the minister of defense should have spoken. you see , this is for me. somehow, this is very painfully perceived by many of the citizens with whom i communicate, so to speak, you understand, but there is not just some kind of appeal, there are no complaints against the general. he is a military man, so to speak, he laid out everything, well, there must have been some kind of position. uh, it seems to me voiced, so the reason to be on more of this. eh, it wasn't high. by the way, not speeches. there is state thinking. you don’t understand these things in any way, but

you need to talk to people in some way today. it feels like somehow we get all sorts of ideas from here. and that there will be a truce all the same or that reconciliation will be non-measurement? how is it all to chaos in the soul is chaos, and it must definitely be extinguished. well, you need to put it out with the truth and the fact that you need to talk to people dmitry but really agree, koryan. georgievich needs to talk to people. and, unfortunately, we sat in previous world. yes, where it was not necessary to talk with people, but it was necessary to create some for them. but some elements of everyday comfort that well, yes , were created, and from this, in fact, the answer to your karen georgievich question, but many people want victory, but they want victory that is not

ah, that does not require any effort from them, all the more super efforts. this is what is called the previous world. this is the world of comfort, the world that michael themselves arrived, the world of ghana's efficiency and profit, as they said in my soviet past, and yes and no trouble. eh, capitalism in the form in which we observed it lies in the fact that there is even unclean and profit there, namely, confusion. let there be less money. well, you don't have to do anything. there, then, shift the papers. here i am as a person who worked in space in a large company. i can confirm this for you. it's just that someday i'll write an observation about open space, but i'll tell you this, if you send, could the great leonov go out into outer space to assume that many years later

open space will be understood in a completely different way organization of the office space, but actually we have one of uh one of our problems today. we were offered a struggle of systems. yes, as if we did not announce, we are some other capitalism. it’s as if we didn’t even announce that we are trying in every possible way to convince our western partners to go to the other west that we are our own bourgeois and let’s somehow come to an agreement. yes, but the system of more than 50 states is against us. i will add here under the hundreds of the largest multinational retail chain companies, which are more than we opposed the states to them. so far they have not even been able to oppose what we have always

succeeded in, but always in russia social mobilization has been achieved. well, it always has been. and somehow, this time we are facing very big problems. that is, like victories, then yes, and if not victories, but maneuvers, then very serious problems begin, and from this and from this i actually got three words. i even wrote them down. the first three are our priorities. the first is a forecast. we were horribly wrong in predicting the future peace. that is, what we predicted as the world of 2020 has nothing to do with the world in which we now live in war, win, lose. doesn’t have it, even now it’s not very decent to read. here are the gracious

comments. and this is very bad for you. this is very bad. this means that this forecast was influenced, and by and large, not a single, well, truly revolutionary trend. we have not seen now, well, that means this forecast, but the factors that lay outside also influenced it. professionalism of the people who made this prediction second second the word, in my opinion, is catastrophically important for us. this is will. probably, i will say unpleasant things, but the main thing is, why did these guys die prisoners. this is what they have broken the will to fight, you have to fight. we must fight, even if there is no chance, but it's scary. and we have exactly the same thing happening in

politics when? they folded their hands and are waiting for someone to offer us something now, well, if they didn’t offer us, they didn’t offer anything seven times already. does anyone really think that on the eighth they will offer us some more or less acceptable, and option, and the settlement of the situation in ukraine is in fact everything that the americans are doing. it's a classic. this is a classic, cold war. yes , there was a track. yes there was a track very strategy of two roads. so, on the one hand, this is a carrot in front of our noses, waving , and on the other hand, by force of pressure , we are supplying more and more destructive types of weapons, dangerous types of weapons. and they have no way out, they do not run out of dangerous ones. they will be forced to supply more long-range missiles. they will be forced to supply, including in so

called wet leasing, most likely, all aircraft, they will be forced to supply anti-personnel mines, including those prohibited by them, the west has no options for how to go up the escalation stairs, and in this sense, the main thing, on what we should have options, how to go, along the escalation line, they said no options no options go . don't horse, don't go up the escalation line. they have their way down. no, they ran out of everything they were on, and they could go down about nothing, they only had what was up. well , the last word, which seems to me very what matters to us is integrity. 80% of those fakes are those stuffing that have been carried out over the past month. and i'll tell you, i've been doing these things for about 20 years. i can tell you that the last

month is unique, probably, sometime the last october of the beginning of november will be written about in textbooks. so that's 80% of everything that was thrown at us and which, unfortunately, had a very negative impact. let's just say the negative impact on our public opinion for the first time in october. we managed to break through our defenses and we must not deny it, but think how it is correct thinking how hmm to talk to people honestly create a bet at least informational, about which we have been talking since february and which cannot be realized in any way. the problem is that no one even tries to explain why this is impossible. this is the worst thing, because it is impossible. everyone has already understood. well, now explain why this is impossible, and then further and silence in response. well, this is all because of the loss of integrity. i'll just give one example, lying on

the surface. ok then. we are here in a number of propaganda tribunes declare that ukraine is a terrorist state supported by the west. well, yes, it carries out terrorist acts, because there is no other name for what was done on the crimean bridge. well, right there right there, as they say on the same day we are talking about we are ready to lead with them. uh, dialogue without preconditions. well, fir-trees-sticks. well, if they are terrorists, how are you going to have a dialogue with them without a prerequisite mustache, the preconditions for this dialogue should be destruction terrorist infra? ktury, which is in ukraine and cured. for a fair judgment of those people who were involved in this. well , the latest is mikhail gosplan himself. yes, but in the conditions when we are clamped down by sanctions, we still need a

state supply agency, which will e find out what, where, what someone has and how to get something. here in this case, it will be another state supply. but this is a couple of the state planning system and really your lending scheme. so it seems to us that this is a very working option. first, i'm with you i completely agree that until we have success there will be no real victories. well, i even just repeat once again to carry out the minimum program, that is, to completely liberate the territories of the four subjects. e, newly adopted e, four subjects of the russian federation within their administrative boundaries. until then, it won't. that reached the west would be insolent the barrel would be there to threaten. e. europeans, by the way, they are americans

, uh, i especially like the mile, uh, he is not burdened, uh, political, so to speak obligations to the biden administration, and uh, that's why he directly says that the achievement of the ukrainians there. he is true and says about us that the achievement of the victory is, uh, unrealistic, but at least he, uh, does not yell that the russians need to be defeated on the battlefield . yes, the american american policy, so to speak, is to wear out russia, wear out the economic, wear out the military. i do not agree. by the way, with e. with this, uh, well, constant and in the european press in statements that the russian armed forces are degrading, they are all, so to speak, on the contrary, everything ends. i you, well just one example. here are the americans with their characteristic scorpio. they count everything. so they calculated that from 24. february 5 to e, the present day, russia has

spent 3.500. uh, high-precision missiles , i mean caliber and x-101. aviation rocket. i think that they do not consider the iskanders as a high-precision weapon with a long range, because it is of a short range. it's comparable. this figure is comparable to those figures, for example, that the americans used in the yugoslav companies. well, there is a period. it was a little shorter, but nevertheless, nevertheless, that is, to say that russia ends something there, i would not have eaten more than that. uh, all, uh, signs that ours yes, unfortunately we have a lot of bureaucracy, a lot of bureaucracy, and in the government, the ministry of defense. also, probably enough bureaucracy. you are very, uh, we swing for a long time. but i think that when we swing completely. i think our industry. here leonid ivanovich here

mentioned the treaty on conventional armed forces in europe, i just dealt with these issues. we had such a period when we started to reduce. here, the ural factories produced tanks and immediately disposed of them. this is how the conveyor worked, they released it, they disposed of it, it was released and it was disposed of, because it was necessary to reduce, and stop production, which was still so to speak. well, on the soviet model, so to speak , it was probably impossible to stop the work. that is, we can, and it’s another matter that yes, there is a lack of qualified personnel, and there is a shortage in the army police personnel market, so to speak, well, in the consequences of what we have experienced. this is the reform of the system of military military education, when dozens, if not hundreds of military schools of the academy were reduced there, of course.

as for, by the way, about the watch group, uh, we experienced at one time, the so-called period of humanization of military service. one year of military service. here you are talking conscripts. and what should conscripts do at the front now for a year - this is the development of a military specialty. here is the year of the soldiers is learning to be a driver mechanic, to be, uh, a crew commander, and the second year, when we had 2 years, he served. yes, he already served as a specialist, so now send conscripts to the front. but it is valid in six months. this is cannon fodder. well , you can, but it will still work. we are now taking conscripts who finish the year and then become contract soldiers. yes, then here is a conscript , and now we are calling on those who served, those who

served. here he served, received a specialty there, and then he is subject to it, so to speak. uh. we are say the same duma said invisible expediency in increasing the deadlines. well, there's a war going on somewhere. where is it appropriate? you just thought you said you must mean 450 people in the house. and who said you're talking, who said minutes, what he said now. tell me, do you really think that people care about this, no, you didn’t stop and didn’t leave. no, hello, so the journalist said, i'll tell you. yes, journalists do not make decisions there. i thought he accepts, but at home he decides the salary. go just what you led now president of russia i think we have who united russia i led excuse me, the majority elected her. in the duma there are four think, listen, get out of here, the information policy of the state. you just

said, let's bet information. well, they leave then, if i do it, you know, i'm afraid where to go to fight politics, listen, the state took elected you say to the people. you have the state to the journalist of the state company wait a minute, i have the product or the journalist of the state company buys funds. we don't advertise earn more extraordinary empowered people. well done. this is an effective person, become a journalist and leave as you voted the easiest thing to cry more to cry. that's all. get up go to the fruit bad power to reform russia is reforming the hard question was well done. and yushchenko is there. yes, of course there were a lot, guys. by

the way, all of france go to war. if you can't do anything at home, now you hear about the third world war. you know, i'm not inclined. still, of course, these are examples. there are no serfs looking. everything this is the first world war. the second world war. well now is the time. another now is not that already a world war. i think, i'm sure the americans and my conversations with me so to speak. many of my exes. familiar or current acquaintances of americans and europeans, they all understand this very well. nobody wants to fight with russia because the war with russia is direct - zelensky is trying to destroy each other. yes, zelensky is trying this rocket. you know, it's very uh, so to speak, well, on the surface, lying uh, version that it's a provocation purposeful provocation. i admit this, but i also admit other versions that, firstly, this may be substandard, because the missiles that are in ukrainian, so to speak, are for the s-300. they are all

old. they are all already there. there are dozens of years or e, non-qualification of the calculation of the s-300 yes s300 e pt, which are in service with the 540 zenith of the ukrainian missile regiment. yes, they used e to shoot at ground bodies. goals. all this is yes, but i because you understand, that's what everyone says. fifth article fifth article immediately and immediately world war. well, i can even here, well, they will not save time by quoting, but there is no automatism. there is no collectivism. each participating state evaluates, so to speak, that's what happened there, an attack on one or several, and an independent decision is made, how should it act, including? armed means of struggle, that is, this fifth article was used only once.

that's for the latest it's the twin towers. and what, after that, yes, an operation was launched in afghanistan, but first they launched their operation there the americans entered there americans help from their allies. they got mostly help that they didn't get it from us. i remember that period it was in general. well, it’s incomparable when such information was transmitted to the americans, and in real-time mode they asked in the evening to get a map of minefields and asked the north or to jump back and the north alliance lived, that is, such help from outside. e of the russian federation , what am i, for example? well, i'm not thanked. they us, then launched their nato operation, but you are operation. well, who's there? germany great britain and the rest? all there is one tank, one helicopter, there is one squad, that is, the fifth article has shown

its complete failure. and now e about, well, i don’t even want to talk about these atrocities when e-e shoots our prisoners, but i think we need to answer. yes, you can answer as our israelis answer here. colleagues, that is , a decision is simply being made to destroy the physical destruction of those people who are guilty of shooting the olympic team in munich israel was then all destroyed for a year or two or three. i don't remember. how many it took for this, but all were destroyed. here, too, but more efficient then you need. uh, here it is being applied, this morning i heard that again an air raid alert had been declared throughout ukraine. so it continues. here we must continue to strike at the infrastructure at the military infrastructure -energy military enterprise e military-industrial he, through the dnieper,

you understand, destroy the grouping and bridges, there are two tunnels to destroy them all, and everything will stop movement. i'll tell you more, but there are questions that. well, zelensky, he is visited by the holy raisins, he is visited by the holy kherson, so to speak, among the poor. well, why not at least scare him? well , why at least a blow? well, if not, but here, so here you can continue to strike sensitive blows. and then suddenly the sunka gets scared, then e to come to the black widow to respect the pen. here , all western leaders travel in comfort, so to speak, on the same railway. here, therefore, therefore, to say that we do not have e some answer options. they are, they just need to be

used to be used yes advertising.

an unpleasant question about the murder of russian prisoners of war, the first case was not killed before. and why were they silent? a